Not that it is missing, just paid out to blatantly known criminals and fraudulent accounts.
Think of it this way (super over simplified), they are a checkbook, and he makes sure the checks get written. Millions a day. Medicare, welfare, military, congress, judicial, grants, all federal spending goes through this checkbook. They aren't even the accountants, they just write the checks, and make sure they get written for every approved expenditure, whatever it is. Its not their job to look for fraud, that is upstream of them. All check requests they receive have already been approved elsewhere. So these guys seem to think anything that gets to them is already past any kind of fraud check, they just keep the payments rolling.
I would hazard to guess this includes money for dark ops, investigations, and other stuff that looks questionable, and no one wants to accidentally stop an investigation, or whatever, no matter how dirty it looks. That is probably the justification they use so they can sleep at night.
It sounds like, though, Reality is no one wants to be the one to rock the boat. When the funds are already approved, there are severe penalties for preventing payments going out to pay for something congress has approved. Long time anons should be familliar with that concept as we've seen trump threatened in his first term multiple times, the executive branch can't really stop the money flow when congress has already passed/forced/jammed through new legislation, it was approved, and all that's left is to write the checks.
Though I don't know how the blatant fraud will play into it, I do know this is getting into constitutional territory.
The way he left sounds very suspicious to me. I agree totally with you. I posted on another topic, these people need to be punished for their crimes or otherwise, it is "rinse and repeat".
30 min docu series each night highlights a Government Employee that has wronged the Tax Payer. Studio Audience gets to Tar and Feather them after listening to their transgressions.
I came here right before bedtime here in Malta to post this and found it it was already posted. I fell asleep. But I wanted to say, holy shit, the frogs have stepped up since I issued my challenge last week. Right now almost every time I see something on PDW that I think belongs on g a w I find it already posted
The highest-ranking career official at the Treasury Department left the agency after a clash with allies of billionaire Elon Musk over access to sensitive payment systems, according to three people with knowledge of the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe private talks.
David A. Lebryk, who served in nonpolitical roles at Treasury for several decades, announced his retirement Friday in an email to colleagues that was obtained by The Washington Post. President Donald Trump named Lebryk acting secretary upon taking office last week. Lebryk had a dispute with Musk’s surrogates over access to the payment system the U.S. government uses to disburse trillions of dollars every year, the people said. The exact nature of the disagreement was not immediately clear, they said.
Officials affiliated with Musk’s “Department of Government Efficiency” have been asking since after the election for access to the system, the people said — requests that were reiterated more recently, including after Trump’s inauguration. Tom Krause, a Silicon Valley executive who has now been detailed to Treasury, is among those involved, the people said. Krause did not respond to requests for comment.
Advertisement
A spokeswoman for DOGE declined to comment. Lebryk could not be reached for comment.
When Scott Bessent was confirmed as treasury secretary on Monday, Lebryk ceased to be the acting agency head. Trump administration officials placed Lebryk on administrative leave before he announced he would step down, two of the people said.
Typically only a small number of career officials control Treasury’s payment systems. Run by the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, the sensitive systems control the flow of more than $6 trillion annually to households, businesses and more nationwide. Tens, if not hundreds, of millions of people across the country rely on the systems, which are responsible for distributing Social Security and Medicare benefits, salaries for federal personnel, payments to government contractors and grant recipients, and tax refunds, among tens of thousands of other functions.
The clash reflects an intensifying battle between Musk and the federal bureaucracy as the Trump administration nears the conclusion of its second week. Musk has sought to exert sweeping control over the inner workings of the U.S. government, installing longtime surrogates at several agencies, including the Office of Personnel Management, which essentially handles federal human resources, and the General Services Administration, which manages real estate. (Musk was seen on Thursday visiting the GSA, according to two other people familiar with his whereabouts, who also spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe internal matters. That visit was first reported by the New York Times.) His Department of Government Efficiency, originally conceived as a nongovernmental panel, has since replaced the U.S. Digital Service.
The executive order Trump signed creating DOGE also instructed all agencies to ensure it has “full and prompt access to all unclassified agency records, software systems, and IT systems,” which would appear to include the Treasury payment systems.
It is unclear precisely why Musk’s team sought access to those systems. But both Musk and the Trump administration more broadly have sought to control spending in ways that far exceed efforts by their predecessors and have alarmed legal experts.
On Monday, the White House Office of Management and Budget ordered a freeze on all federal grant spending — an order it rescinded two days later amid intense political backlash and lawsuits over the consequences of that decision.
Musk has characterized the rising national debt as an existential threat to the country and has proved willing to break norms in service of sweeping change.
Still, the possibility that government officials might try to use the federal payments system — which essentially functions as the nation’s checkbook — to enact a political agenda is unprecedented, said Mark Mazur, who served in senior Treasury Department roles during the Obama and Biden administrations.
“This is a mechanical job — they pay Social Security benefits, they pay vendors, whatever. It’s not one where there’s a role for nonmechanical things, at least from the career standpoint. Your whole job is to pay the bills as they’re due,” Mazur said. “It’s never been used in a way to execute a partisan agenda. … You have to really put bad intentions in place for that to be the case.”
In the 2023 fiscal year, the payment systems processed nearly 1.3 billion payments, accounting for about $5.4 trillion, nearly 97 percent made electronically, according to the Treasury Department. Every payment was made on time.
Lebryk’s departure is expected to be a shock to Treasury personnel, among whom he enjoys a sterling reputation. The lifelong bureaucrat joined the department as an intern in 1989 and spent three decades at the agency under 11 treasury secretaries, serving as acting director of the U.S. Mint and commissioner of the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, among other roles.
In his email announcing his retirement, Lebryk praised the department’s staff.
“Please know that your work makes a difference and is so very important to the country. It has been an honor to work alongside you,” he wrote. “Our work may be unknown to most of the public, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t exceptionally important.”
Michael Faulkender, whom Trump nominated as deputy treasury secretary in December, praised Lebryk’s work in 2023.
“I could not, to this day, tell you his politics,” Faulkender, who served as an assistant secretary at Treasury during Trump’s first term, told The Washington Post at the time. “He always seemed to be relaxed and under control.”
“Nonpartisan” “bipartisan” “nonpolitical” do not mean “constitutional” “lawful” “righteous” “nonfraudulent”.
If “reviewing what’s actually paid” is “political”, “partisan”, “bad intentioned” - I.e. if BEING FUCKING AUDITED indicates “bad intentions”, the speaker is in on the crime.
David Lebryk, need his home computer, cell phones, family friends, family, co workers and do an audit on all of them, even their off shore and Swiss accounts
If their's more than 1,000 dollers missing,charge him with a felony.
Not that it is missing, just paid out to blatantly known criminals and fraudulent accounts.
Think of it this way (super over simplified), they are a checkbook, and he makes sure the checks get written. Millions a day. Medicare, welfare, military, congress, judicial, grants, all federal spending goes through this checkbook. They aren't even the accountants, they just write the checks, and make sure they get written for every approved expenditure, whatever it is. Its not their job to look for fraud, that is upstream of them. All check requests they receive have already been approved elsewhere. So these guys seem to think anything that gets to them is already past any kind of fraud check, they just keep the payments rolling.
I would hazard to guess this includes money for dark ops, investigations, and other stuff that looks questionable, and no one wants to accidentally stop an investigation, or whatever, no matter how dirty it looks. That is probably the justification they use so they can sleep at night.
It sounds like, though, Reality is no one wants to be the one to rock the boat. When the funds are already approved, there are severe penalties for preventing payments going out to pay for something congress has approved. Long time anons should be familliar with that concept as we've seen trump threatened in his first term multiple times, the executive branch can't really stop the money flow when congress has already passed/forced/jammed through new legislation, it was approved, and all that's left is to write the checks.
Though I don't know how the blatant fraud will play into it, I do know this is getting into constitutional territory.
If he never denied any payment -- literally -- then he could not have been overseeing anything.
He was engaging in fraud, so prospecute him and let him sing like a bird about who gave him his marching orders.
Agreed. I cannot accept that he would have absolutely no recourse to report onvious fraud.
That's their defense. We didn't know. We assumed. Someone else fid that.
If the knew something was wrong, that's the problem. Knowingly.
100% this
there's.
our’s
🤣
we’re’s
notthey's / notthem's
The way he left sounds very suspicious to me. I agree totally with you. I posted on another topic, these people need to be punished for their crimes or otherwise, it is "rinse and repeat".
TO MUCH GOVERNMENT
Arrest and waterboard.
Tar and Feather Show…bear with me.
30 min docu series each night highlights a Government Employee that has wronged the Tax Payer. Studio Audience gets to Tar and Feather them after listening to their transgressions.
Nothing says I AM GUILTY like quitting the job and running away!
(They going to be audited anyway!)
Time for a subpoena. Lack of cooperation will lead to jail time.
Just arrest and be done with it, don't waste time.
Exactly, let him rot in a jail somewhere waiting on charges/ trial. This is the message these treasonous civil servants need.
What am I missing here, so he retired, does that mean they don’t have access to the computer system?
Then if he fucked with a government computer system on the way out, that's a felony.
Retired to gitmo? 😏
Payments are on autopilot!!
This is our money. We the people have a right to look at our own bank account.
I came here right before bedtime here in Malta to post this and found it it was already posted. I fell asleep. But I wanted to say, holy shit, the frogs have stepped up since I issued my challenge last week. Right now almost every time I see something on PDW that I think belongs on g a w I find it already posted
...Am I reading this right?
A MOD got his comment removed?
They could have deleted it themselves.
Eh, fair enough, but still weird it would show up like this.
Does he get the 7 months severance?
Pedo or commie?
Can they access it now?
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/dIXvmSne0dY
Time to lock his ass up.
$6 Trillion a year in Taxc Payer money needs accountbilty. Why are you scare to let $6 Trillon a year be audited?
More here. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/01/31/elon-musk-treasury-department-payment-systems/
Can’t read it because of the dang pop up wanting me to pay. Grrr
Here:
The highest-ranking career official at the Treasury Department left the agency after a clash with allies of billionaire Elon Musk over access to sensitive payment systems, according to three people with knowledge of the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe private talks.
David A. Lebryk, who served in nonpolitical roles at Treasury for several decades, announced his retirement Friday in an email to colleagues that was obtained by The Washington Post. President Donald Trump named Lebryk acting secretary upon taking office last week. Lebryk had a dispute with Musk’s surrogates over access to the payment system the U.S. government uses to disburse trillions of dollars every year, the people said. The exact nature of the disagreement was not immediately clear, they said.
Officials affiliated with Musk’s “Department of Government Efficiency” have been asking since after the election for access to the system, the people said — requests that were reiterated more recently, including after Trump’s inauguration. Tom Krause, a Silicon Valley executive who has now been detailed to Treasury, is among those involved, the people said. Krause did not respond to requests for comment. Advertisement A spokeswoman for DOGE declined to comment. Lebryk could not be reached for comment.
When Scott Bessent was confirmed as treasury secretary on Monday, Lebryk ceased to be the acting agency head. Trump administration officials placed Lebryk on administrative leave before he announced he would step down, two of the people said.
Typically only a small number of career officials control Treasury’s payment systems. Run by the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, the sensitive systems control the flow of more than $6 trillion annually to households, businesses and more nationwide. Tens, if not hundreds, of millions of people across the country rely on the systems, which are responsible for distributing Social Security and Medicare benefits, salaries for federal personnel, payments to government contractors and grant recipients, and tax refunds, among tens of thousands of other functions.
The clash reflects an intensifying battle between Musk and the federal bureaucracy as the Trump administration nears the conclusion of its second week. Musk has sought to exert sweeping control over the inner workings of the U.S. government, installing longtime surrogates at several agencies, including the Office of Personnel Management, which essentially handles federal human resources, and the General Services Administration, which manages real estate. (Musk was seen on Thursday visiting the GSA, according to two other people familiar with his whereabouts, who also spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe internal matters. That visit was first reported by the New York Times.) His Department of Government Efficiency, originally conceived as a nongovernmental panel, has since replaced the U.S. Digital Service.
The executive order Trump signed creating DOGE also instructed all agencies to ensure it has “full and prompt access to all unclassified agency records, software systems, and IT systems,” which would appear to include the Treasury payment systems.
It is unclear precisely why Musk’s team sought access to those systems. But both Musk and the Trump administration more broadly have sought to control spending in ways that far exceed efforts by their predecessors and have alarmed legal experts.
On Monday, the White House Office of Management and Budget ordered a freeze on all federal grant spending — an order it rescinded two days later amid intense political backlash and lawsuits over the consequences of that decision. Musk has characterized the rising national debt as an existential threat to the country and has proved willing to break norms in service of sweeping change. Still, the possibility that government officials might try to use the federal payments system — which essentially functions as the nation’s checkbook — to enact a political agenda is unprecedented, said Mark Mazur, who served in senior Treasury Department roles during the Obama and Biden administrations.
“This is a mechanical job — they pay Social Security benefits, they pay vendors, whatever. It’s not one where there’s a role for nonmechanical things, at least from the career standpoint. Your whole job is to pay the bills as they’re due,” Mazur said. “It’s never been used in a way to execute a partisan agenda. … You have to really put bad intentions in place for that to be the case.”
In the 2023 fiscal year, the payment systems processed nearly 1.3 billion payments, accounting for about $5.4 trillion, nearly 97 percent made electronically, according to the Treasury Department. Every payment was made on time. Lebryk’s departure is expected to be a shock to Treasury personnel, among whom he enjoys a sterling reputation. The lifelong bureaucrat joined the department as an intern in 1989 and spent three decades at the agency under 11 treasury secretaries, serving as acting director of the U.S. Mint and commissioner of the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, among other roles.
In his email announcing his retirement, Lebryk praised the department’s staff. “Please know that your work makes a difference and is so very important to the country. It has been an honor to work alongside you,” he wrote. “Our work may be unknown to most of the public, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t exceptionally important.”
Michael Faulkender, whom Trump nominated as deputy treasury secretary in December, praised Lebryk’s work in 2023. “I could not, to this day, tell you his politics,” Faulkender, who served as an assistant secretary at Treasury during Trump’s first term, told The Washington Post at the time. “He always seemed to be relaxed and under control.”
Ty, 👍👍
“Nonpartisan” “bipartisan” “nonpolitical” do not mean “constitutional” “lawful” “righteous” “nonfraudulent”.
If “reviewing what’s actually paid” is “political”, “partisan”, “bad intentioned” - I.e. if BEING FUCKING AUDITED indicates “bad intentions”, the speaker is in on the crime.
Whenever they site three anonymous sources, they’re always lying
He weighted his options! White Hats may give him jail time; the Deep State would send him to early retirement in Satan's lair!
Probably SES. Rat is running. Bye!
The bottom of the photo says Accuracy: Low. Has this been confirmed any where else? Edit it is true. https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5119996-david-lebryk-retirement-treasury-doge-musk/
David Lebryk, need his home computer, cell phones, family friends, family, co workers and do an audit on all of them, even their off shore and Swiss accounts
Totally not suspicious
Criminal negligence. Retiring won't save him.
Why do these demonrat white-collar criminals think that retiiring will absolve them of any responsibility?
TO MUCH GOVERNMENT
Follow the money.
HANG THIS MUTHA FUCKIN’ TRAITOR!
Boil em, mash em, put em in a stew