Dennis Wagner X:
Imtiaz Mahmood: "Let me tell you why a Muslim would drive his car into a crowd of innocent people. I was raised Muslim, and I know exactly why this happens. It’s not poverty. It’s not oppression. It’s not even radicalization. It’s the logical outcome of Islamic doctrine itself.
It doesn’t matter if you’re a Muslim or not; we, as human beings, carry guilt deep inside us. We know we are not good enough and spend our lives trying to redeem ourselves through good deeds, thinking it will make the guilt disappear.
Christianity, for example, offers a way out of guilt, a solution not based on your works but on Christ’s. Salvation isn’t earned; it’s given. You accept that you can’t redeem yourself because Christ did everything on your behalf. That means you’re free. Free to live, free to build, free to serve, free to love.
When Christians feel lost, broken, and needing forgiveness, they can go to church, talk to a pastor or priest, and leave knowing they have been forgiven.
Islam, on the other hand, doesn’t offer redemption; it weaponizes guilt. Instead of providing salvation, Allah exposes you, holds your sins over your head, and threatens you with hellfire and torture in the grave.
The Quran isn’t a book of peace; it’s a book of threats. It bullies Muslims into obedience through fear, humiliation, and punishment.
So, what happens when a Muslim seeks redemption? They try to be better Muslims. They pray, fast, give to charity, go on Hajj, and do everything Allah commands. But it never works. I know. I did it.
And no matter how much you pray, no matter how much you try, the guilt never goes away. Because deep down, every Muslim knows it’s not enough. Allah always demands more.
Allah loves those who die fighting against the infidels. That’s not an opinion, it’s in the Quran, Hadith, and every lesson taught to children.
This is why Muslims, even the so-called "moderates," always hesitate to condemn terrorism. Because they know Allah requires jihad. They might not be willing to commit it themselves, but they cannot say it’s wrong.
So when a Muslim fails to reach peace through religious rituals, they have two choices:
Give up, stop being devout, and learn to live with the guilt, or commit to jihad because that’s the only way to be true to yourself.
The Quran spells it out clearly: “Kill those who do not worship Allah or obey the Prophet” (9:29).
So when a Muslim embraces this identity fully, killing infidels isn’t just justified; it’s joyful. It’s an act of:
✔ Saving yourself ✔ Obeying Allah ✔ Securing your eternity ✔ Finally escaping the crushing weight of guilt
This is why a Muslim can drive his car into a crowd of innocent people and feel nothing but satisfaction. Because for the first time in his life, he finally believes he has done something worthy of redemption."
Let me tell you why a liberal would torch the Tesla of innocent people. It’s not oppression. It’s not even radicalization. It’s the logical outcome of liberalism itself. It doesn’t matter who you are, we, as human beings, carry guilt deep inside us. We know we are not good enough and spend our lives trying to redeem ourselves through deeds, thinking it will make the guilt disappear.
Christianity, for example, offers a way out of guilt, a solution not based on your works but on Christ’s. Salvation isn’t earned; it’s given. You accept that you can’t redeem yourself because Christ did everything on your behalf. That means you’re free. Free to live, free to build, free to serve, free to love.
When Christians feel lost, broken, and needing forgiveness, they can go to church, talk to a pastor or priest, and leave knowing they have been forgiven.
Liberalism on the other hand, doesn’t offer redemption; it weaponizes guilt. Instead of providing salvation, the ideology exposes you, holds your “sins” over your head
I've been saying it for years: Liberals are more dogmatic than the Christians they claim to hate.
As an ex-lefty, I agree with you.
Liberalism is a secular religion. Which is why there are so many liberal fanatics.
How did you become an 'ex-lefty'. Leaving that religion is a crime... ;-)
Yes, it is a crime in the eyes of those who remain. You get severely punished for it by some of your friends and family.
It's similar to what happens if you become openly anti-vax.
So Liberalism = Islam and antidote is Christianity ?
I think we need to lean on our born set of morals. Some have had them beat or threatened out of them I get that. Some of us not. Some chose not to follow and some will follow no matter what.
Is this not the essence of a spiritual battle ?
This is why the antidote to liberalism is a conservative, Christian upbringing. Christianity is not just a religion, it's a moral code. This is the reason why the liberals seek to debase and corrupt Christianity by using ad campaigns that preach radical acceptance of everyone, regardless of what they may do, say, or believe in. They misconstrue "love they enemy as you would love yourself" into being the basis for that radical acceptance.
You are not born with a set of morals. You have a God-given conscience. It tells you whether you are sinning or not. The idea of morals is a human construct. But no, it is a gift from God so that men can live in society and in peace.
100% the God's honest truth.
anti-dote is freedom.
That should be the essence of Christianity.
These are description of one single item: love God above all else (live, freedom) and your neighbor as yourself ( pursuit of happiness).
Interesting analogy and explanation, and quite possibly true in essence. But I think there may be an additional factor involved, and it boils down to this. There are two types of people (and cultures) in the world.
There are high-IQ creators who can conceptualize a new idea or invention, make it come into being, and give the world something of value. Think across the span of history of people like Edison, Musk, Gutenberg, Shakespeare, et al. These and people like them are the creators.
Then there are people who, through low-IQ or laziness or outright stupidity, who cannot create anything of value, so they instead become destroyers of anything new or novel, anything beautiful, preferring the world to conform to the ugliness and chaos of their own lives.
The last thing Islamic 'culture' created was the ancient concept of zero (0) in mathematics... and that's where they stopped. Islam today has some of the best minds the 3rd Century AD ever created.
I would submit, also, that there are two types of people in the world:
Normal human beings with empathy and conscience. Whether high or low IQ, they all value love, building, and creating on whatever level they are capable of. They are the ones who value civilization and (actual) equal opportunity.
Sociopaths with no empathy and no conscience. They value power, control, food, and sex. They honestly believe that the strong have every right to rule over the weak and to use others people any way they choose. They are the ones who end up running everything because they are so ruthless. They are why the world largely sucks, because the normals don't recognize them for what they are and they just keep right on going.
Sociopaths are notoriously uncreative. That's because all art is just emotion given form; and when your only emotions come from cruelty and a determination to control others, you end up with sick and twisted art or no art at all. But, no worries; they just force the normals to build and create for them.
You will see this in every place in the world and at every time period in history. The time and place we're in now is no different in that the sociopaths, once again, are trying their best to control everything and use the normals solely for labor and taxes.
No, your thesis is incorrect, and very elitist, as if those with lower IQ do not have the same exact conscience as the "creatives". More elititsm. Everyone is creative in many ways, from the way they arrange themselves, their homes, their garden and how they raise their children and in myriad other ways. Yes, some people have talents and greater gifts of intellect, but this fact does not divide the world population in two. We are all the same, but God's gifts are not spread across the people equally. That would have made for a boring world. This is another reason why communism can never work: people are never all equal in anything except, perhaps, their God-given rights. This reminds me of the earliest attempts, when I was in school, to create "team projects". How I hated that! Some would be doing all the creative work, and in fact, most of all the work, and the others would follow along, contributing little. Then, all would receive the same grade. It seemed so unfair to me then, and NOW. Let each do their own work and be judged. No piggy-backing off the work of others!!
I hear your argument, and admit that once I sort of held the same opinion. I outgrew it, though. But your post above appears to refute your own thesis, saying that people are not equal in gifts... take that to its logical extreme, there are those with no 'gifts' at all except for the propensity to break, tear down, and destroy the creations of others.
Our prisons, mental hospitals, and our own government is full of people who cannot create, but only destroy. That much is obvious to me.
I agree. I also used to think that everyone was the same - but we are not all the same. Please see my other post on this thread about the two different kinds of humans in the world.
Who told you life was fair ?
The one doing most of the work will always be doing it where ever they go. So they are just getting stronger and use to it.
Groups ,committees & meetings are about finding someone with an idea , solution, answer or idea that the rest will get behind.
It’s almost as if being born again and being a Christian is different than any other religion 🧐
Nothing like pointing at the origin of the problem in order to effect a solution. While at the same time showing the path.
"Neither shall men say, Lo here, or lo there: for behold, the kingdom of God is within you." --- Luke 17:21 --- 1599 Geneva
Yup. There's a real good reason for the fear of Islam. Sometimes phobias are justified and reasonable.
https://illinoisfamily.org/islam-sharia/knowing-four-arabic-words-may-save-our-civilization-from-islamic-takeover/
This is a top 10 post of all time at GAW. It explains much.
This is a fantastic post. Thanks for the sticky mods.
Jesus said…
“Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.” John 14:6 NKJV https://bible.com/bible/114/jhn.14.6.NKJV
Islam is a death cult.
It’s almost as if Islam was created by Satan 🧐
This post is great insight for everyone, and something we all need to guard against.
It’s not just a Muslim situation, it’s all of us.
Those who call it Islam instead of Mohammedanism are new speak programmed. Those who convert to Mohammedanism, have no brain. Those who practice their version based on he said she said stuff not only have no brain, but have no heart. Those who allowed these people to come in, committed crimes against humanity.
Explain the naming significance and why people should use the 13 letters instead of 5
Good Question!
It depends on its meaning and the energy in motion pronounced by words or thought. It is an egregoire.
The more the 5-letter word is used, the more it gains in strength. The 13-letter word was used extensively years ago. Somewhere along the line we changed it, by recognizing it, we accepted defeat: i.e. subjection.
Look around.
The word play is being perpetrated on all kinds of matters. When you would dive deeper into the cavern of Freemason thought/ magic thought, you will find this type of thinking.
From a Christian perspective, using the 5 letter word, violates the idea of thinking that which is wholesome, kind, loving, etc. This expresses the same idea. Or as Christ would have: not what comes into the man spoils him, but what he excretes.
Or popularly said: Be mindful of your thoughts, young Paduan.
That didn't actually answer the question as to WHY the shorter word is worse or the longer one better, but it's OK.
Bottom line: Without a compelling reason not to, people (especially in the US) will always tend to gravitate away from a 13-letter, 5-syllable word to a 5-letter, 2-syllable one when they perceive it to be a synonym or a reasonable facsimile thereof.
That said, two terms I often use, islamofascist and islamonazi, do have 5 syllables while mooselimb has only 2. ;p
In that case, please, research: chants, invocation, speak, frequency, vibration, creation. Unfortunately, English is a mix and bastardation of quite a number of languages, or better said: ways to use the tongue, as langue means tongue. This is quite confusing at times.
islamofascist actually is a reinforcement of the negative (subject doer coupled to the emotion or energy that is contained in the programmed thought: fascist). Same for islamonazi or mooselimb. It all starts with thought and the quality of the emotion i.e. energy related to it. That creates what is.
In English this is called reality, which is purely that what is material ( from mater/ mother) In Germanic languages, WIRKLICHKEIT, or that what seems to be working is wider in meaning, as it leaves room for that which on a meta-physical level has a additional power.
You are posing the question: WHY. In essence you are asking: WHO, as the word why, means for which man? The reason for the season, so to speak.
The people who are at a level of influencing the outcomes, create egregores, or energy umbrellas where they harvest the energy induced by emotion. There are several Freemason groups who only focus on words and meaning. What do you think is the reason for that? Because it is fancy?
Look at communism. In essence, the words drive it. It is ideology. Thought and emotion is aligned to bring about something destructive on the aggregate level. Words are given new meaning and appeal to the lower vibrational state of being.
Compare that to a contemporary class mate of Marx, Max Stirner. The book: the one and his property (Der Einzige und sein Eigentum, of course in English mistranslated: The Unique and Its Property; as if there is talk of a matter, instead of man; see how that works?) focuses on the individual and his rights from the perspective of man being the embodiment of rights.
Conventional analysis tries to frame his ideas in commie vernacular, subverting its power. see how that works?
As far as compelling reason, there is only one compelling argument: personal cognition of facts, meaning, knowing thyself. And this lies at the heart of moral decay, as weak people tend to subordinate their own authority to those considered to be authority, and are being lead by what is fancy, fictitious.
Yes, correct. That is exactly what happens. Perception and misguided reason. Unless, one sees the mirage for what it is: a trick on the mind.
This is the only part that isn't
Excellent piece. And as it pointed out, the parallels hold up with our current leftists, too.
This is why Islam is ultimately a death cult. Because death - either the deaths of others whose lives your take, or your own - is the only way you can feel any peace. There is no path to forgiveness for any wrongdoing, either your own or anyone else's. Only death gives you peace. It reminds me a lot of Japanese samurai culture, which still influences their people today.
Christianity does offer a path to forgiveness. You still must understand what you might have done wrong and then vow to stop doing it ("Go, and sin no more.") And others who have done you wrong must do the same; they must also understand what they did wrong and vow to stop doing it.
But it is this concept of forgiveness that makes all the difference. That's why Christianity is not a death cult; it is a way of forgiveness and life.
Are there any other religions who have this? Buddhism, maybe? I don't know that much about it.
Islam is incompatible with the West. Unfortunately, liberals have deluded themselves to think that somehow it will work this time. Our forefathers had more sense and saw the reality for what it was and pushed them back.
Those in places of power know this to be true. Flooding the West with the Muslim hoard is deliberate. Since we are incompatible, this will eventually lead to total societal unrest - just what they want. People will demand for something to be done. Enter more control and loss of freedom. They want total domination.
Islam can not offer redemption without acknowledging the redeemer. Christ came for all of us. God loved man enough to do that fortis.
"The Quran spells it out clearly: 'Kill those who do not worship Allah or obey the Prophet' (9:29)."
Islam is a death cult incompatible with American liberty. We should not allow any immigration from practicing Muslims, and we should not tolerate the practice of Islam here.
I respect religious freedom. In a free country, we are allowed to believe what we want and practice our religion to the extent that we don't harm others. But when your "religion" is teaching you to kill and subjugate non-believers, it's not a religion. It's a dangerous, self-perpetuating criminal cult.
Our leftist politicians, media, professors preach tolerance and admiration for Islam, and leave out that in addition to its poetic and peaceful passages, at heart, practitioners are being indoctrinated and pressured to kill and subjugate us.
Muslims can be wonderful people, but only to the extent that they reject the core teachings of Islam.
Please don't ever delete this post. I bookmarked it because it is so well written and clearly explained the psychology behind Muslims. I will show it to everyone I know and their cousins.
Thank you OP.
When I read the post last night, it made so much sense why moderates are silent. It is a death cult. How horrible that the only “peace” they have is in killing or dying
Best explanation I've heard regarding the difference in psychology of these two religious beliefs! The third monotheistic has been hijacked by the Zionist and they just claim superiority based on the false doctrine of Gods chosen people! They are right just because they are chosen by God, period! What God would entertain killing innocent civilians? Romans adopted Christianity because they had to! They corrupted it! Zionist adopted Jewry because they had to! They corrupted it! No one enters the Gate that does not know and believe in Jesus, no matter how rich and important you are in this material world! Greed has led men to decieve other men for personal material gain! Gain the world and lose your soul comes to mind!
Makes sense.
Yes it does. Now deport every single one back to the Stone Age lands they worship and desire.
The origins of Islam are very likely Satanic. Muslims never question whether the entity that encountered Muhammed was good or evil. They lack discernment and just blindly believe it was good.
I want to remind others that good entities can actually perform miracles that benefit people. They are a creative force. Evil entities can only manipulate. They "whisper" suggestions to others to do their bidding.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1k9Y1U0c46I
I liked the plot twist at the end
Islam and political Zionism are going to destroy each other.
I know this because I am a student of history, a close study of 'between the lines' fact patterns and an avid 'noticer'.
No Time Machine necessary.
The following is an excerpt from a 1871 letter by General Albert Pike:
"The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the 'agents' of the 'Illuminati' between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other."
Many aha moments for anyone that can reconcile that 👆🏽 with where we are right now.
Interesting you left the rest out;
"We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.4
Exactly u/Standingoak... exactly!
The reason I left it out is because it distracts the reader from first fully considering the part I quoted.
It does this because the proper conclusion on the first part is unlikely to be arrived at once they get to the part you quoted, which is not well understandable on the face of itself.
99 out of 100 people that read the full letter, through our current belief system/paradigm, do not understand the significance of what they are reading as it relates to what's going on in the world right now.
Reasonable explanation.