For many years the World has wondered why Prescription Drugs and Pharmaceuticals in the United States States of America were SO MUCH HIGHER IN PRICE THAN THEY WERE IN ANY OTHER NATION, SOMETIMES BEING FIVE TO TEN TIMES MORE EXPENSIVE THAN THE SAME DRUG, MANUFACTURED IN THE EXACT SAME LABORATORY OR PLANT, BY THE SAME COMPANY??? It was always difficult to explain and very embarrassing because, in fact, there was no correct or rightful answer. The Pharmaceutical/Drug Companies would say, for years, that it was Research and Development Costs, and that all of these costs were, and would be, for no reason whatsoever, borne by the βsuckersβ of America, ALONE. Campaign Contributions can do wonders, but not with me, and not with the Republican Party. We are going to do the right thing, something that the Democrats have fought for many years. Therefore, I am pleased to announce that Tomorrow morning, in the White House, at 9:00 A.M., I will be signing one of the most consequential Executive Orders in our Countryβs history. Prescription Drug and Pharmaceutical prices will be REDUCED, almost immediately, by 30% to 80%. They will rise throughout the World in order to equalize and, for the first time in many years, bring FAIRNESS TO AMERICA! I will be instituting a MOST FAVORED NATIONβS POLICY whereby the United States will pay the same price as the Nation that pays the lowest price anywhere in the World. Our Country will finally be treated fairly, and our citizens Healthcare Costs will be reduced by numbers never even thought of before. Additionally, on top of everything else, the United States will save TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS. Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
Don't overinterpret this. It's hype. The President has no authority whatsoever to control prices of any product sold in the private sector. Full stop. We're a free market economy, not a communist country.
What he's likely referring to is the price HHS will pay for drugs via Medicare/Medicaid. He doesn't have statutory authority to control those prices either. In fact, the law specifically says he can't negotiate prices because that act in and of itself is a form of government price control, so Congress forbade it.
This is going to be in front of a judge quickly and it should be. The last thing we want is the precedent set where the President can just wave his pen around and determine what the price for a product or service must be in this country. That would destroy the economy and quickly, just like it does in every Marxist country that has ever existed.
And if he gets rid of the income tax (unlikely, we're too deep in debt), he still has to figure out how to fund the government. Tariffs aren't even a drop in the bucket compared to what we currently need. We're going to need a lot more DOGE and more importantly, a Congress to actually pass a law to mandate those changes permanently. Right now, our Congress is allergic to helping Trump do anything.
Don't overinterpret this. It's hype. The President has no authority whatsoever to control prices of any product sold in the private sector.
These companies literally killed millions, deliberately and knowingly, skirting all safety precautions for a massive profit grab and shaving decades off the lifespans of every American who got the jab.
Trump has enough kompromat on Pharm companies to make them give all medicine for free for the next 10 years if he wanted to.
How does that work with the idea that forcing tariffs on products from other countries will make manufacturers come back to the US and will make things cheaper for us?
I mean Iβm pretty sure the meds are already made in the US and shipped around the world but the IS customers have to pay a higher rate than the other countries. And we are not sure at what level all countries will negotiate with the US to lower the tariff.
Also, if it's true that pharmaceuticals manufactured in the United States is more expensive for US population...that kind of contradicts that whole issuing tariffs to get companies to move manufacturing back to the US in order for people in the US to pay lower prices.
If tariffs are to make manufacturers bring jobs back to America what good is it doing for that to agree to lower tariffs with all these countries. Seems like itβs not putting a huge hurting on any of those countries
Well, I can't say you're wrong about how this will play out, because that's exactly how it played out back in 2020 when he tried doing this same thing (even calling it the same), and it was shot down.
When liberals were saying the exact same thing back pre 2016, conservatives were saying it was anti-capatalist, thus anti-American.
Just curious, were you following all the ACA melodrama during the 2016 election? It was like 50% of what Trump was running under, the other 50% being the big beautiful wall that Mexico would pay for.
Why was it anti-American back then, but essential for life now?
No. European national health services are single payers. They negotiate prices directly with the drug manufacturers. Pharma has to deal because it's a question of either: gain access to the market and make some money, or reject the offer and lose out on access to the entire country's customer base. So, Pharma gives them a reduced price and uses the American market to offset the losses.
As for banning imports, FDA already mostly does that. Only a tiny handful of factories outside of the US are FDA-certified to make drugs legal to sell in the US. FDA rigidly controls their entire operations and if you try and bring in something they didn't authorize, they'll toss you in prison for drug smuggling.
Trump's very rapidly going to get an education on how the system works this week as the judges and soon-to-be medication-expert urinalists hang him out to dry in the press over this. Right goal. Totally wrong approach.
βThe four orders that Iβm signing today will completely restructure the prescription drug market, in terms of pricing and everything else, to make these medications affordable and accessible for all Americans,β President Trump said.
SO MUCH HIGHER IN PRICE THAN THEY WERE IN ANY OTHER NATION, SOMETIMES BEING FIVE TO TEN TIMES MORE EXPENSIVE THAN THE SAME DRUG, MANUFACTURED IN THE EXACT SAME LABORATORY OR PLANT, BY THE SAME COMPANY???
Tomorrow morning, in the White House, at 9:00 A.M., I will be signing one of the most consequential Executive Orders in our Countryβs history. Prescription Drug and Pharmaceutical prices will be REDUCED, almost immediately, by 30% to 80%.
Additionally, on top of everything else, the United States will save TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS.
Did he just cut off Big Pharma in his EO being signed tomorrow?
It's a big deal indeed. He is building up to something, with the way he's posting these. I'm curious to what the EO will say tomorrow, it could be bigger than we think, just not at the surface level.
Edit: Actually, depending on what this EO is all about, and if it is indeed a kill shot to Big Pharma...that's going to piss off the DS bigly, as it's a major cash cow/flow for them. I'd be expecting some type of response from them fairly quickly too.
Yep. Also I asked Grok about hedge funds and their exposure to Pharma stocks:
"Yes, hedge funds have significant investments in Big Pharma stocks, as these companies are often seen as stable, defensive investments with strong cash flows and dividends.
Defensive Investing: Hedge funds often turn to pharma stocks during economic uncertainty due to their non-cyclical nature and consistent consumer demand for healthcare products."
Maybe the short hedge funds are going to see some major pain next week
And you're right, perhaps the EO has some other stuff we don't know about yet.
Not a chance. Q said he'd be fully distanced from 'the storm' so even if/when he posts that tweet I bet it will be in reference to something else the normies can latch onto but we'll also have a win by smoshing Q's post all over the internet with his post matching it.
A buddy had cancer in one kidney. He wanted it taken out but they talked him into chemo. "A new procedure, put the chemo straight into the kidney!!!". My buddy went for it, once a week for six weeks at $26,000.00 a dose. 4 weeks after chemo, the cancer is back in the kidney and they did surgery removing the kidney. That's big pharma for you. I still want to ask the oncologist how much he got paid to sell that rip off.
"Cabal OWNS Big Pharma. Big Pharma needs buyers, distributors and markets. Poor people will not buy vaccines, medicines. Who can be the buyer? The 'aid' organizations. Who funds them? The tax payers. Did you ask the tax payers? Nope, but governments come in handy funding the 'aid' organizations, who buy the vaccines from Big Pharmaβ¦. So we have chain Tax Payers (stolen) money diverted to cabal. Double whammy when the government loan money from cabal and sends it back to cabal. Liability is left to tax payers.
Considering what is dictated in Rules for Radicals, control of healthcare is one of if not THE biggest factors to keeping a society under thumb at a base level. By going after the rot of Big Pharma and things like high-cost insurance rackets, tainted vaccines, cures withheld from the general public, this could serve as a huge first step in the Great Awakening. A healthy and hale populace would be that much harder for the cabal to control, which makes Pharma a priority target of the swamp drain. "
I think some of you aren't seeing the big picture. How many fake news organizations will go out of business when they stop getting the millions of dollars in "advertising" from big pharma? "Brought to you by Pfizer!"
Even bigger... How many members of CONgress will decide to not run for reelection when they stop getting their contributions and kickbacks?
For those who complain, "But, this news isn't big enough!", please consider it from the perspective of the pharma industry. For them, it is BIG. And sobering. That little whistling sound is the contraction of a whole lot of sphincters.
I'm on blood thinners, specifically Pradaxa. It was expensive, about $300 a bottle, but my insurance cut it down to about $35. Then it went generic and now it is nominal, about $5 a bottle, but my insurance doesn't have to cover it. Nothing wrong with cost avoidance in matters of health.
Also, health is not reliance on pharmaceuticals. Pharmaceuticals are just what people do instead of things like lifestyle changes. Eating better. Stop smoking. Exercise.
I would stake my life on saying that if people just did those three things, there wouldn't even be a need for pharmaceutical companies.
And I'm sure that you believe that your case is all unique and stuff and that there is nothing you can do other than swallowing whatever the pharmaceutical company gives you that will make a difference.
Let's just save the time and effort and go ahead to agree to disagree on the matter.
What are you talking about? I haven't seen any effects on my prescription costs except for the price reduction on generic Pradaxa. There are no "lifestyle" corrections for blood coagulation tendencies. I have a repaired mitral valve and any clotting would be highly dangerous. During surgery, I had heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, which resulted in three clots and anemia, and had to stay in hospital for 19 days. "Staking your life" is cheap rhetoric. I was staking my life for real. And it was up and down with warfarin, and another alternative, and finally Pradaxa. So, if you think you know better how to deal with my case, become a cardiovascular doctor and set up a practice. You sure as hell would not have known how to conduct the surgery.
The subject was the cost of pharmaceuticals, not your vest pocket second opinion of my situation.
Very sorry to hear about your problems, but the fact of the matter is that most health problems can be prevented or helped by having a healthy life style.
Eating a healthy diet, not smoking, exercising regularly, controlling stress.
These are all proven to drastically reduce the chances of developing severe health problems like you describe.
Like I said before, and like you reinforced in your last post, I'm sure that you believe that your case is unique and you had no choice but to have to take medication.
There's no need for you to get all hyperdefensive about why you have so many health problems.
It's amazing how often I see conversations about how personal responsibility is dying off and that if people just did what they were supposed to do and not be fat slobs sitting on a computer all day, chain smoking and gobbling down junk food, then people wouldn't need all these pills they take.
But whenever I point out to someone talking about their health problems that it's better to prevent health issues rather than just perpetually treat them, I get stuff like this with people acting like they had no choice in life but to have to take pharmaceuticals all the time.
It's a definite case of "Rules for thee, not rules for me!", I think.
I'm sorry it seems to be too late for you, personally, but it's still a valid point for life, in general.
I'm a mature person and am taking care of my health, but you are out in space if you think that living habits control blood coagulation chemistry. A flailing mitral valve appears, in my family, to be a hereditary condition, announced prior to the failure by an onset of heart murmur. It all went very fast and had no relationship to my health, which was in good shape at the time. NOTHING is predictive of the tendency to HIT, nor can it be affected by diet.
There was one problem. Please don't magnify it for the sake of polemics. And unless you can stipulate a specific alternative to blood thinners, you are talking through your hat. I have thrown off a number of prescribed medications for different problems because they treated the symptom, not the problem, and I have gone outside of conventional medicine to get results. (E.g., krill oil for peripheral edema, chiropractic, acupuncture, endocrinological monitoring.) I have been in good health with a good diet for most of my life. I was a horseman and a walker. You have a nerve to insinuate I am somehow a layabout with reckless disconcern for how I live.
And you are full of it to think "it is too late" for me. I don't think that way at all. It will be my pleasure to outlive you, as much as it is a sorrow for me to have outlived others.
What has "design" to do with anything? Obviously, a healthy life leads to a healthy life. That is a trivial truism. I try my best to do that. But you come down with some debilitating problems that baffle your doctors and interfere with your own mental acuity and energy, and then see how that works out. I'm not saying that drugs are any cure, because they haven't been and probably won't be. But I am looking into supplements for brain, liver, and gut. Also, have fun with atrial fibrillation and flutter if they intrude on your life. Surgery is about the only way to eliminate them. Good luck on living a healthy life. It is not always under your control. I've attended funerals of too many friends who lived healthy lives (which is no argument against a healthy life---just that it does not make you invulnerable).
Which "it" are you thinking of? You mentioned 4+. I don't have time to wander through the literature on every approach. I am thankful to receive references to specific information on ivermectin. And some have been kindly provided by now.
Am I the only one that remembers he tried to do the exact same thing during his first term and there were so many lawsuits against it, it was never implemented?
My BP meds are cheaper here by a few bucks, but not when you have to go through the Medical Industrial Complex of paying the Dr. So while I was in the Philippines I stocked up on them, more than a year's supply of both... They are ultra cheap to begin with so they do indeed cost more in The Philippines than here, but you can get almost all meds over the counter without a prescription there except any meds that get you high.
I can't remember what I paid, possibly 200, but would have been a hundred here AND another several hundred for the Dr visits, and that's twice a year.
While I hoped for the Message My Fellow Americans, or one of the other's people postulated, I'm not disappointed. My wife works for a hospital and has Diabetes and High BP, and all the other problems associated, she has 7 meds, one of which is 1,000 a month. She is lucky in that the hospital put her on a program where all her meds are free, but many people don't have that luxury.
She had Spinal Encephalitis which is about 40% fatal last year. Her hospital bill was 72,000 but just recently her account showed that the insurance paid 100%. However I think part of it was written off by the hospital, but it wasn't stated as such, since the Insurance doesn't pay 100% Normally according to their policy.
However don't think how nice too much, because Spinal Encephalitis is a possible side-effect of the jab. When we returned to the USA from the Philippines with a couple of suitcases each and unofficially separated to boot, she took the 2 mandatory to keep your job jabs, and there was nothing I could do to stop her. She supports a lot of Filipino family and that's a tough choice. Some people have to make sacrifices for their family. She also took a booster because the Philippines required it still when she went home on vacation. So that's on her.
If she has further issues and dies, I will pursue a law suit if that becomes possible...
Filipinas are raised up to be all about family, thats why they make the most caring Nurses in the world. The Dongs (Men) are less so. Like South and Central America they spoil the boys and make the girls the responsible ones. One Expat put it aptly, they raise the girls to be boys and the boys to be girls, but not in a sexual way. My wife NEVER had a birthday party as a child, her brothers did.
Here is the life of many OFW (Offshore Foreign Worker) many of which work at low wages in domestic positions. You of coarse have to send money home to Nanay (Mother), and possibly to send siblings or other family to school. You are expected to send Balikbayan boxes home, its cheap to ship relatively, but they go on freight ships and it takes months to arrive. It is a special privledge that bypasses Customs (Many Expats cheat since enforcement of Filipino to Family laws) So then when you return home for vacation, often a month or so, you are expected to bring gifts for everyone with the more distant the relation or friendships getting a very small gift. You are also expected to wine and dine everyone, and then they look at you funny when you are finally broke. Note: Often the money sent home isn't put to the use you sent it for.... That is except for Nanay money, she has the discretion to spend as she sees fit, but most Nanay will use it for the food budget.
Thanks for reading all this info. It took my mind off the world situation while I wrote it, and I'm often verbose.
Sounds like everyone else's prices will be going up. Probably a net gain for big pharma. Not a complaint. Just an opinion. I hate to see the hardships that these costs bring to the people who need them. Although, I believe the cures are in nature and the ailments are often avoidable via truth and nutrition.
I understand but I'm grateful that MANY people will now be able to afford their live saving medicines, rather choosing between food and their medicine until other natural healing protocols are revealed.
I still believe that most of pharma is designed to kill and not benefit health and wellness. My deep prayer is that the day when medicine is no longer needed is coming soon. π
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/114491534347862682
For many years the World has wondered why Prescription Drugs and Pharmaceuticals in the United States States of America were SO MUCH HIGHER IN PRICE THAN THEY WERE IN ANY OTHER NATION, SOMETIMES BEING FIVE TO TEN TIMES MORE EXPENSIVE THAN THE SAME DRUG, MANUFACTURED IN THE EXACT SAME LABORATORY OR PLANT, BY THE SAME COMPANY??? It was always difficult to explain and very embarrassing because, in fact, there was no correct or rightful answer. The Pharmaceutical/Drug Companies would say, for years, that it was Research and Development Costs, and that all of these costs were, and would be, for no reason whatsoever, borne by the βsuckersβ of America, ALONE. Campaign Contributions can do wonders, but not with me, and not with the Republican Party. We are going to do the right thing, something that the Democrats have fought for many years. Therefore, I am pleased to announce that Tomorrow morning, in the White House, at 9:00 A.M., I will be signing one of the most consequential Executive Orders in our Countryβs history. Prescription Drug and Pharmaceutical prices will be REDUCED, almost immediately, by 30% to 80%. They will rise throughout the World in order to equalize and, for the first time in many years, bring FAIRNESS TO AMERICA! I will be instituting a MOST FAVORED NATIONβS POLICY whereby the United States will pay the same price as the Nation that pays the lowest price anywhere in the World. Our Country will finally be treated fairly, and our citizens Healthcare Costs will be reduced by numbers never even thought of before. Additionally, on top of everything else, the United States will save TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS. Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
Hot dog. This is the shit we need done before midterms. That and abolishment of income tax should do it
I agree! Dems heads will be exploding! π€―πΉ
Their ritalin and adderall is going to be super cheap! They might even consider adding a couple extra prescriptions, just for funsies!
π§¨π§¨π§¨π§¨π§¨π§¨π§¨π§¨π§¨π§¨π§¨π§¨π§¨π§¨π§¨π§¨π§¨π§¨π§¨π§¨π§¨π§¨π§¨
πππππ€£π€£π€£
Don't overinterpret this. It's hype. The President has no authority whatsoever to control prices of any product sold in the private sector. Full stop. We're a free market economy, not a communist country.
What he's likely referring to is the price HHS will pay for drugs via Medicare/Medicaid. He doesn't have statutory authority to control those prices either. In fact, the law specifically says he can't negotiate prices because that act in and of itself is a form of government price control, so Congress forbade it.
This is going to be in front of a judge quickly and it should be. The last thing we want is the precedent set where the President can just wave his pen around and determine what the price for a product or service must be in this country. That would destroy the economy and quickly, just like it does in every Marxist country that has ever existed.
And if he gets rid of the income tax (unlikely, we're too deep in debt), he still has to figure out how to fund the government. Tariffs aren't even a drop in the bucket compared to what we currently need. We're going to need a lot more DOGE and more importantly, a Congress to actually pass a law to mandate those changes permanently. Right now, our Congress is allergic to helping Trump do anything.
These companies literally killed millions, deliberately and knowingly, skirting all safety precautions for a massive profit grab and shaving decades off the lifespans of every American who got the jab.
Trump has enough kompromat on Pharm companies to make them give all medicine for free for the next 10 years if he wanted to.
Ok so is he going to allow people to buy said medicines from the cheapest source cause even with tariffs it might be cheaper to ship around the world
How does that work with the idea that forcing tariffs on products from other countries will make manufacturers come back to the US and will make things cheaper for us?
I mean Iβm pretty sure the meds are already made in the US and shipped around the world but the IS customers have to pay a higher rate than the other countries. And we are not sure at what level all countries will negotiate with the US to lower the tariff.
Really? Pretty sure?
Last I checked, about 80% of our generic drugs come from China or India or some other country.
I donβt usually buy generic drugs myself and hardly ever buy pharmaceutical meds of any kind
Also, if it's true that pharmaceuticals manufactured in the United States is more expensive for US population...that kind of contradicts that whole issuing tariffs to get companies to move manufacturing back to the US in order for people in the US to pay lower prices.
Right?
Can't have it both ways.
If tariffs are to make manufacturers bring jobs back to America what good is it doing for that to agree to lower tariffs with all these countries. Seems like itβs not putting a huge hurting on any of those countries
Only after he raised it. Trump lowered it in his first term.
Well, I can't say you're wrong about how this will play out, because that's exactly how it played out back in 2020 when he tried doing this same thing (even calling it the same), and it was shot down.
https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/trump-administration-announces-prescription-drug-payment-model-put-american-patients-first
I'm not sure what is so different this time around.
Am I really the only one that remembers this stuff?
When liberals were saying the exact same thing back pre 2016, conservatives were saying it was anti-capatalist, thus anti-American.
Just curious, were you following all the ACA melodrama during the 2016 election? It was like 50% of what Trump was running under, the other 50% being the big beautiful wall that Mexico would pay for.
Why was it anti-American back then, but essential for life now?
What authority does he have to do it though?
It's why Europe pays so little, they just make it illegal to charge more. He can't set the price but he can ban the import.
No. European national health services are single payers. They negotiate prices directly with the drug manufacturers. Pharma has to deal because it's a question of either: gain access to the market and make some money, or reject the offer and lose out on access to the entire country's customer base. So, Pharma gives them a reduced price and uses the American market to offset the losses.
As for banning imports, FDA already mostly does that. Only a tiny handful of factories outside of the US are FDA-certified to make drugs legal to sell in the US. FDA rigidly controls their entire operations and if you try and bring in something they didn't authorize, they'll toss you in prison for drug smuggling.
Trump's very rapidly going to get an education on how the system works this week as the judges and soon-to-be medication-expert urinalists hang him out to dry in the press over this. Right goal. Totally wrong approach.
He already did it. More than 5 years ago.
https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/articles/congress-didnt-act-on-prescription-drug-prices-so-president-trump-did/
Why would this time be any different?
Wow, someone else that remembers that!
Sometimes I wonder if I'm secretly a super hero and my super power is being able to remember stuff.
Because I don't know why other people don't remember things from even one day to the next.
Vax in many cases.
What about vax?
Prescription Drug and Pharmaceutical prices will be REDUCED, almost immediately, by 30% to 80%. Potentially a huge win!
Did he just cut off Big Pharma in his EO being signed tomorrow?
Sounds like it. Not what I expected but I like it. Anything that destroys Big Pharma $ is a win.
Next Truth, announce the release of cures, thank you for your attention to this matter.
It's a big deal indeed. He is building up to something, with the way he's posting these. I'm curious to what the EO will say tomorrow, it could be bigger than we think, just not at the surface level.
Edit: Actually, depending on what this EO is all about, and if it is indeed a kill shot to Big Pharma...that's going to piss off the DS bigly, as it's a major cash cow/flow for them. I'd be expecting some type of response from them fairly quickly too.
We are all getting spoiled, expecting bigger, sooner, MOAR! LOL. President Trump is setting an amazing pace.
It's like Christmas morning everyday under the greatest American president in History, President Donald John Trump! πΊπ²
Yep. Also I asked Grok about hedge funds and their exposure to Pharma stocks:
"Yes, hedge funds have significant investments in Big Pharma stocks, as these companies are often seen as stable, defensive investments with strong cash flows and dividends.
Defensive Investing: Hedge funds often turn to pharma stocks during economic uncertainty due to their non-cyclical nature and consistent consumer demand for healthcare products."
Maybe the short hedge funds are going to see some major pain next week
And you're right, perhaps the EO has some other stuff we don't know about yet.
That's very possible, and if "BP" stocks tank tomorrow, it could trigger something that cannot be stopped. Hedgies are fucked
Citadel's exposure to BP stocks isn't very significant according to Grok. Idk, let's see what happens.
GmE to the π
ππ
Hedge funds do not 'invest'. They trade and use synthetics etc.
Mutual funds invest somewhat long term.
Some hedge funds may blow up of they are geared into health care stocks. If they are short they will win, that is what makes a market.
Yeah basically they do nothing that contributes any value to society.
Moon tommorow.
So, like, "tomorrow" tomorrow? Or like, "two weeks" tomorrow?
Always tomorrow.
Finally! Tomorrow!
Not what we were all expecting, but as you say qa anything that describing pharma is a win...on to the next win!
Yep. They are one of the top corrupt evil organizations on the planet.
yesssssss!
u/#yesss
next I want to learn how to post that, nice you got it!
Start here: https://greatawakening.win/p/19AdSMWGYK/the-new-and-improved-gifs-and-q-/
That's the newest page...there are 6 pages.
Have fun!
u/#catdance
got it thanks, it took me a moment to figure, each gif has a header or title, remove the space when copying
Right on
u/#WaaahCat
Why do I get an error code when I click on the u/# gifs?
Great I could pay less for Pharma products I REFUSE to purchase. But it will help some I'm sure
Insulin, epinepherin, poison antidotes, ... lots of others that don't have natural alternatives or for which cures are not known
Exactly. Many diabetics were amazed when their prices were slashed by Trump's first round with the favored nation policy in his first term.
I am hoping Republicans can make this a permanent law.
Or not disclosed
Indeed. I'm looking forward to those disclosures.
Correct Rardog! βοΈ
I would rather he said we're moving away from harma drugs and toward more effective natural alternatives
Why would he say what the plan was? This will significantly weaken these pharma companies bringing them to the table.
Yay poison products are now just cheaper.
Not gonna lie- I was hoping for the biggest announcement π. My fellow Americansβ¦
He hasn't made the BHs mad or scared enough.
Me too
Not a chance. Q said he'd be fully distanced from 'the storm' so even if/when he posts that tweet I bet it will be in reference to something else the normies can latch onto but we'll also have a win by smoshing Q's post all over the internet with his post matching it.
Celgene charges $1,000 for cancer drug that costs 25 cents to make posted 25 minutes ago by aslan_is_0n_the_m0ve
A buddy had cancer in one kidney. He wanted it taken out but they talked him into chemo. "A new procedure, put the chemo straight into the kidney!!!". My buddy went for it, once a week for six weeks at $26,000.00 a dose. 4 weeks after chemo, the cancer is back in the kidney and they did surgery removing the kidney. That's big pharma for you. I still want to ask the oncologist how much he got paid to sell that rip off.
Paid for a new Porsche?
A lot of them are criminals & there will repercussions.
Yes goodbye pharma cartel profits
All Q posts with "Pharma" in them
https://qagg.news/?q=pharma&q2=
I was seeing comms about Rothschilds today.
Example, this post by The White House account had a timestamp of 2:52 PM EST. So they called it early. https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/1921639444240535833
Sounds like this will be a big blow to the roths
u/#q252
u/#q1220
"Cabal OWNS Big Pharma. Big Pharma needs buyers, distributors and markets. Poor people will not buy vaccines, medicines. Who can be the buyer? The 'aid' organizations. Who funds them? The tax payers. Did you ask the tax payers? Nope, but governments come in handy funding the 'aid' organizations, who buy the vaccines from Big Pharmaβ¦. So we have chain Tax Payers (stolen) money diverted to cabal. Double whammy when the government loan money from cabal and sends it back to cabal. Liability is left to tax payers.
Considering what is dictated in Rules for Radicals, control of healthcare is one of if not THE biggest factors to keeping a society under thumb at a base level. By going after the rot of Big Pharma and things like high-cost insurance rackets, tainted vaccines, cures withheld from the general public, this could serve as a huge first step in the Great Awakening. A healthy and hale populace would be that much harder for the cabal to control, which makes Pharma a priority target of the swamp drain. "
Tippy Top dig qa! π
I don't care if they give it away, I'm never buying any pharmaceutical product made by Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca, or Moderna.
What if they are forced to start releasing cures
this βnextβ TruthSoc. came fast!
Meh, good news for millions but I'm not on any meds currently and will stay that way as long as I have any say in the matter.
But good though, maybe this will be another facet to medical reform.
Cabal controls Big Pharma, a big source of their income. This is a big win for EVERYONE.
I think some of you aren't seeing the big picture. How many fake news organizations will go out of business when they stop getting the millions of dollars in "advertising" from big pharma? "Brought to you by Pfizer!"
Even bigger... How many members of CONgress will decide to not run for reelection when they stop getting their contributions and kickbacks?
Jeez... Not the big announcement I was expecting... but, we're still winning peeps ...
I'm not getting tired yet ...
Are YOU?
YOU gonna beg POTUS to stop???
NOT TIRED...πΈ
Going to be fun to watch the stock market tomorrow!!!
You said it wolfe!
Howls!!!!
This was on my short list for the announcement, but the βEnjoyβ threw me.
For those who complain, "But, this news isn't big enough!", please consider it from the perspective of the pharma industry. For them, it is BIG. And sobering. That little whistling sound is the contraction of a whole lot of sphincters.
I'm on blood thinners, specifically Pradaxa. It was expensive, about $300 a bottle, but my insurance cut it down to about $35. Then it went generic and now it is nominal, about $5 a bottle, but my insurance doesn't have to cover it. Nothing wrong with cost avoidance in matters of health.
Well, he did the same exact thing back in 2020.
How did that work out for you? What is different this time? https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/trump-administration-announces-prescription-drug-payment-model-put-american-patients-first
Also, health is not reliance on pharmaceuticals. Pharmaceuticals are just what people do instead of things like lifestyle changes. Eating better. Stop smoking. Exercise.
I would stake my life on saying that if people just did those three things, there wouldn't even be a need for pharmaceutical companies.
And I'm sure that you believe that your case is all unique and stuff and that there is nothing you can do other than swallowing whatever the pharmaceutical company gives you that will make a difference.
Let's just save the time and effort and go ahead to agree to disagree on the matter.
What are you talking about? I haven't seen any effects on my prescription costs except for the price reduction on generic Pradaxa. There are no "lifestyle" corrections for blood coagulation tendencies. I have a repaired mitral valve and any clotting would be highly dangerous. During surgery, I had heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, which resulted in three clots and anemia, and had to stay in hospital for 19 days. "Staking your life" is cheap rhetoric. I was staking my life for real. And it was up and down with warfarin, and another alternative, and finally Pradaxa. So, if you think you know better how to deal with my case, become a cardiovascular doctor and set up a practice. You sure as hell would not have known how to conduct the surgery.
The subject was the cost of pharmaceuticals, not your vest pocket second opinion of my situation.
Very sorry to hear about your problems, but the fact of the matter is that most health problems can be prevented or helped by having a healthy life style.
Eating a healthy diet, not smoking, exercising regularly, controlling stress.
These are all proven to drastically reduce the chances of developing severe health problems like you describe.
Like I said before, and like you reinforced in your last post, I'm sure that you believe that your case is unique and you had no choice but to have to take medication.
There's no need for you to get all hyperdefensive about why you have so many health problems.
It's amazing how often I see conversations about how personal responsibility is dying off and that if people just did what they were supposed to do and not be fat slobs sitting on a computer all day, chain smoking and gobbling down junk food, then people wouldn't need all these pills they take.
But whenever I point out to someone talking about their health problems that it's better to prevent health issues rather than just perpetually treat them, I get stuff like this with people acting like they had no choice in life but to have to take pharmaceuticals all the time.
It's a definite case of "Rules for thee, not rules for me!", I think.
I'm sorry it seems to be too late for you, personally, but it's still a valid point for life, in general.
I'm a mature person and am taking care of my health, but you are out in space if you think that living habits control blood coagulation chemistry. A flailing mitral valve appears, in my family, to be a hereditary condition, announced prior to the failure by an onset of heart murmur. It all went very fast and had no relationship to my health, which was in good shape at the time. NOTHING is predictive of the tendency to HIT, nor can it be affected by diet.
There was one problem. Please don't magnify it for the sake of polemics. And unless you can stipulate a specific alternative to blood thinners, you are talking through your hat. I have thrown off a number of prescribed medications for different problems because they treated the symptom, not the problem, and I have gone outside of conventional medicine to get results. (E.g., krill oil for peripheral edema, chiropractic, acupuncture, endocrinological monitoring.) I have been in good health with a good diet for most of my life. I was a horseman and a walker. You have a nerve to insinuate I am somehow a layabout with reckless disconcern for how I live.
And you are full of it to think "it is too late" for me. I don't think that way at all. It will be my pleasure to outlive you, as much as it is a sorrow for me to have outlived others.
Again, you are missing the point. I'm not sure if it's by design or not.
Either way, good luck on all that.
What has "design" to do with anything? Obviously, a healthy life leads to a healthy life. That is a trivial truism. I try my best to do that. But you come down with some debilitating problems that baffle your doctors and interfere with your own mental acuity and energy, and then see how that works out. I'm not saying that drugs are any cure, because they haven't been and probably won't be. But I am looking into supplements for brain, liver, and gut. Also, have fun with atrial fibrillation and flutter if they intrude on your life. Surgery is about the only way to eliminate them. Good luck on living a healthy life. It is not always under your control. I've attended funerals of too many friends who lived healthy lives (which is no argument against a healthy life---just that it does not make you invulnerable).
I've seen a lot of wonderful claims being made for ivermectin, laetrile, hydrogen peroxide, colloidal silver, etc...
Maybe you could read some of the many, many posts around here discussing how it cures every thing from cold sores to colon cancer.
Just a thought. π
Which "it" are you thinking of? You mentioned 4+. I don't have time to wander through the literature on every approach. I am thankful to receive references to specific information on ivermectin. And some have been kindly provided by now.
Well, if your health isn't worth your time to look at those options, why would it be worth my time?
Last I checked, I wasn't your personal assistant. Maybe go hire one to look for you, if you don't have the time to do so yourself.
But then again, you have the time to do all the pointless back and forth in this conversation...
Maybe you just really don't care that much about your health. π€·ββοΈ
It's easier to just take a pill, right?
Yes...this is YUGE and a blessing for so many! π
Yeah, just like it was a YUGE blessing for everyone back in 2020 when he did it the first time.
Someone call Charlie Brown! Lucy has promised she won't yank the football away this time!
π
Am I the only one that remembers he tried to do the exact same thing during his first term and there were so many lawsuits against it, it was never implemented?
He's even calling it the same name as he did back in 2020. "Favored Nation Pricing". https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/trump-administration-announces-prescription-drug-payment-model-put-american-patients-first
What has changed since then and now that it will make this time different?
https://www.whitecase.com/insight-alert/uncertainty-drug-pricing-remains-following-trump-administration-executive-orders
Not what many were hoping for, but pretty darned Good nonetheless!
Absolutely! But I believe this is more than about Pharma and am checking now...
Yes, I'm quite happy.
My BP meds are cheaper here by a few bucks, but not when you have to go through the Medical Industrial Complex of paying the Dr. So while I was in the Philippines I stocked up on them, more than a year's supply of both... They are ultra cheap to begin with so they do indeed cost more in The Philippines than here, but you can get almost all meds over the counter without a prescription there except any meds that get you high.
I can't remember what I paid, possibly 200, but would have been a hundred here AND another several hundred for the Dr visits, and that's twice a year.
While I hoped for the Message My Fellow Americans, or one of the other's people postulated, I'm not disappointed. My wife works for a hospital and has Diabetes and High BP, and all the other problems associated, she has 7 meds, one of which is 1,000 a month. She is lucky in that the hospital put her on a program where all her meds are free, but many people don't have that luxury.
She had Spinal Encephalitis which is about 40% fatal last year. Her hospital bill was 72,000 but just recently her account showed that the insurance paid 100%. However I think part of it was written off by the hospital, but it wasn't stated as such, since the Insurance doesn't pay 100% Normally according to their policy.
However don't think how nice too much, because Spinal Encephalitis is a possible side-effect of the jab. When we returned to the USA from the Philippines with a couple of suitcases each and unofficially separated to boot, she took the 2 mandatory to keep your job jabs, and there was nothing I could do to stop her. She supports a lot of Filipino family and that's a tough choice. Some people have to make sacrifices for their family. She also took a booster because the Philippines required it still when she went home on vacation. So that's on her.
If she has further issues and dies, I will pursue a law suit if that becomes possible...
Filipinas are raised up to be all about family, thats why they make the most caring Nurses in the world. The Dongs (Men) are less so. Like South and Central America they spoil the boys and make the girls the responsible ones. One Expat put it aptly, they raise the girls to be boys and the boys to be girls, but not in a sexual way. My wife NEVER had a birthday party as a child, her brothers did.
Here is the life of many OFW (Offshore Foreign Worker) many of which work at low wages in domestic positions. You of coarse have to send money home to Nanay (Mother), and possibly to send siblings or other family to school. You are expected to send Balikbayan boxes home, its cheap to ship relatively, but they go on freight ships and it takes months to arrive. It is a special privledge that bypasses Customs (Many Expats cheat since enforcement of Filipino to Family laws) So then when you return home for vacation, often a month or so, you are expected to bring gifts for everyone with the more distant the relation or friendships getting a very small gift. You are also expected to wine and dine everyone, and then they look at you funny when you are finally broke. Note: Often the money sent home isn't put to the use you sent it for.... That is except for Nanay money, she has the discretion to spend as she sees fit, but most Nanay will use it for the food budget.
Thanks for reading all this info. It took my mind off the world situation while I wrote it, and I'm often verbose.
Sounds like everyone else's prices will be going up. Probably a net gain for big pharma. Not a complaint. Just an opinion. I hate to see the hardships that these costs bring to the people who need them. Although, I believe the cures are in nature and the ailments are often avoidable via truth and nutrition.
Ivermectin is dirt cheap in Mexico---at least it was---and Africa. Let's see what the price change happens on it!
Tractor supply too
I also want to point out the HUGE discrepancy in attitudes concerning pharmaceuticals here.
Any other time it would be BIG PHARMA IS EVIL AND SHOULD BE SHUT DOWN AND ALL THE EXECUTIVES PUBLICLY EXECUTED!!!"
Vs now,
PHARMACEUTICALS ARE NECESSARY FOR LIFE FOR AMERICANS AND WE NEED TO MAKE THEM CHEAPER SO WE CAN TAKE MORE OF THEM!!
Honestly, does no one else see this?
WTF, people. Pick a lane.
I understand but I'm grateful that MANY people will now be able to afford their live saving medicines, rather choosing between food and their medicine until other natural healing protocols are revealed.
I still believe that most of pharma is designed to kill and not benefit health and wellness. My deep prayer is that the day when medicine is no longer needed is coming soon. π
You don't get the fundamental dichotomy there?
Pharmaceuticals are evil, and you're glad people are able to afford them?
What happened to all that "President Trump is going to shut down Big Pharma!!" cheerleading at the beginning of his term?
Am I, yet again, the only one remembering how often that was discussed?
Why has he not just revealed all the natural cures that have been repressed, while we're on the topic?
Why not just sign an EO doing that?
Now that I think about it, where are our MedBeds?
What happened with all that?