Thank you Chief Zeldin, for confirming the mysterious contrails, were sulfur dioxide, a potent respiratory irritant affecting the lungs. Never smoked, but years ago, would walk everyday, continuously see chemtrails. Will always need a nebulizer, but praise God, it hasn't developed into cancer.
Probably not. The natural composition of a chemical, occuring in natural amounts, on a natural frequency of release IS NOT the same as an artificially recomposited, distributed, and concentrated release.
I don't see how you can prove that. Elsewhere on this page I went through the numbers, and there is far more SO2 in the atmosphere than any human means can deposit in a "concentrated" form. Gases immediately dissipate by dilution into the surrounding atmosphere, and SO2 does nothing of interest (as I witnessed from living in the neighborhood of a large local source). But you are breathing it right now, at 15 parts per billion concentration, completely harmless and unnoticeable.
But what you need is an AB test and we don't have an AV test meaning what are the levels in existence pre World War II or the start of you engineering. And what naturally occurred in the atmosphere. Secondly it does not automatically dissipate in the atmosphere or the trails wouldn't be lasting for hours upon hours upon hours which they do. And you cannot actually say it's completely harmless and unnoticeable. You would have to compare it to the rise of any other disease and affliction that has happened since the start of you engineering to correlate the data. That is like saying Plastics are perfectly harmless as Plastics are on their surface perfectly harmless however microplastics are not using that as an example. There was no crossing of the blood-brain barrier for microplastics before an accumulation of data. So you're taking a hey you're breathing it in right now and it's harmless as if that's the result of whether it is harmless or not there are things called cumulative effects and cumulative diseases.
Contrails are ice crystals and are a form of high altitude cloud. If the relative humidity is high, they will persist, just like the clouds. They are not sulfur dioxide, which is a gas, which dissipates rapidly by diffusion into the atmosphere. It is a common feature of volcanic eruptions and emissions, which we have known about for centuries.
Yes, I can say it is completely harmless and unnoticeable at a concentration of 15 parts per billion, which is the average composition of the atmosphere. (You obviously don't notice it.) I have lived in an environment of high concentration and, while it is unpleasant, there were no lasting effects on anyone or anything living. What I am saying is backed up by a lifetime of experience, and the lifetimes of others also living in the same world. It is pretty clear you have not researched the subject. It is the old story: ignorance => paranoia.
Plastics and inorganic natural compounds are far different from each other, and no proper analogy can be drawn. The devil is in the details.
Look, relax. We survive in the midst of plenty of volcanic emissions. Human production is about 4 times that, and still no problem. The bogeyman of acid rain was dispelled by proper research. Whole industries are built around the production of sulfuric acid, for which this is a precursor product. We understand it thoroughly. Every lit match produces sulfur dioxide, and we don't freak out about lighting matches.
Why does it rain usually within. 24 hours after these planes finish hashtagging the sky? Why don't I have crickets or fireflies and a huge reduction of birds in my forest? What effect does turning sunny blue skies into gray skies have on the human psyche?
Memorial day is tomorrow. I turned on the heat yesterday. This rainy, cold spring is affecting crops.
The FAA needs to get involved. Those airplanes need flight clearances.
AND WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS EXPERIMENT? (caps intended)
These things appear when a more humid air mass has moved into the vicinity at high altitude. Such an air mass is a leading edge of a rain system that is moving in.
I have no idea what you are talking about regarding common animals. It makes no difference to us.
It does nothing to the human psyche. I live where we have constant clouds, contrails, and what-have-you. People are normal here.
Too bad you have a cold spring. Such things happen. I am having a nice, sunny, warm afternoon, but that is not necessarily the way to bet in my locality.
The airplanes have flight clearances. They are airliners. There is no experiment. These are commercial air flight operations. Their purpose is to get from point A to point B.
Ten years ago I theorized that our sun looks white now instead of the warm orange I remember in my youth because they were spraying something that scattered orange light waves. Turns out Sulfur dioxide scatters ALL color wavelengths when aerosolized in the atmosphere.
Yes, people. Our sun used to look like a bright orange ball of fire in the sky. Now it looks like an LED lamp
Ive noticed everyone’s grass is looking different this year. I mean we’re almost in June. I was mowing almost twice a week last year at this time it was so thick and green. People will say drought as I’m in Tennessee. But there are no signs of a drought. Ponds are full, gardens are rich and green, trees and bushes blooming and growing like crazy, as usual. We get rain at least once a week. But the grass is 50% of what it was last year. Weird.
Mine too. I always have to mow my grass twice a week. Not this year. My pond is full and the soil is rich and damp. I mentioned this to my coworkers and they said they are hardly mowing.
I recently got some night driving glasses that make the wptld look very yellow. As soon as I put them on during the day my eyes completely relaxed and I became calm inside. Like some un seen stress was released. They became so therapeutic I put them in for awhile now every day. I remember when the natural sunlight ight was more yellow than white. At least it seems to me n it was and now its this silvery light we live under. I may be just imagining it, but those glasses made me remember something more natural about the sun light than what we now seem to have. Im not kidding when Insay i get some instant relief when I put them on.
I've been here for 75 years and you are quite wrong. It is always orange at sunset and sunrise, but that is due to long light propagation paths through the atmosphere and normal atmospheric scattering that more strongly affects the blue end of the spectrum. During the normal course of the day, it is bright white. If it is orange at midday, that is due to particulate matter than scatters in a different spectrum than the Rayleigh scattering that produces a blue sky. The sun has always radiated in a black-body spectrum corresponding to about 5,772 degrees Kelvin of color temperature (i.e., white light, effective average). The first measurements using the results of quantum physics took place toward the end of the 19th century. By comparison, "Daylight" LED light bulbs have color temperatures of 5,000 to 6,500 K.
I don't know if you recall this, but it has generally been the case that truly tremendous explosive volcanic eruptions, which inject huge amounts of ash into the upper atmosphere, can result in very colorful sunsets all over the world, for considerable periods of time.
Normal atmosphere scatters all color wavelengths, but more so at the blue end of the spectrum. All gaseous molecules scatter by the Rayleigh process, which gives the same result (some exceptions are the halogens, which can be visible by distinctive colors).
During the normal course of the day, it is bright white.
Yeah. It used to NOT be, is my point. In the 70s, the sun appeared to be warm yellow all day, not just at dawn and sunset. My observation is that the light from the sun has been harsh white for the last 10 years. Entirely unlike the first 40 years of my life.
The sun has always radiated in a black-body spectrum corresponding to about 5,772 degrees Kelvin
You're talking about extraterrestrial radiance. Atmospheric gases selectively absorb and scatter this light, turning it into terrestrial irradiance, whichbis what Im talking about. The light we see from.our sun AFTER it passes through our atmospere and us scattered in various ways.
You've never seen the extraterrestrial radiance of the sun. You've always seen it filtered through our atmosphere, just like most humans.
I'm talking about the way it appeared to me and everyone else in the 50s and onward. The radiance from the sun is only very slightly diminished by atmospheric scattering at midday. It looks the same at high altitude, where over half the atmosphere is beneath us.
Where do you live? What is the tendency for the local weather to carry windborne dust?
You attempted to "debunk" the info by telling us about the extraterrestrial radiance of the sun and how it hasn't changed, knowing full well that the atmosphere and the gases and particulates within it change that radiation profile constantly, changing the way we see light from the sun.
m talking about the way it appeared to me and everyone else in the 50s and onward.
No, you attempted a stawman argument which failed miserably.
I'm afraid you are trying to pick an argument, but you have nothing to say. I was referring to the actual sunlight shining from the daytime sky, not "extraterrestrial" sunlight. If you are going to trap me, please quote me correctly. And I have pointed out that the color of the sun depends on the path length of the sunlight through the atmosphere (sunrise and sunset), so you are omitting my explanation of that effect. Sorry that you don't like what I have explained, but I am under sentence of expulsion if I argue, so I will not argue. Please have a good day.
H2S has been heavily regulated for the oil and gas industry for decades. Emission limits have curtailed production from some reservoirs.
So what the fuck is this demanding answers shit? Go shut the MFs down. The laws are on the books enforce them. I am so damned sick of we're investigating, we're demanding answers, we're looking in to it. The POS in office are sitting on their damned thumbs thinking when Trump is done they can go right back to the corrupt controlled system they had in place.
It is coming up on the time to water the tree of liberty, and string up some evil bastards across this world.
Weather modification INC.
RAS Weather INC
Consultants
These are companies in the USA that seed clouds, in the past few years these companies have been seeding storm clouds in Texas and Oklahoma, that were already thunderstorms, making them dangerous storms with large hail, damaging winds, and deadly tornadoes, Podcaster @Monkeywerx has the receipts of their flight history,
Hold on a second. Did he say sulfur dioxide? I am experiencing flashback trauma. Those who lived through the 1980s remember sulfur dioxide as environmental enemy number one, pounded into us by the mass media year after year. Because acid rain.
The idea was that SO2 combines with H2O to produce H2SO3, sulfurous acid. There was a huge study commissioned by Congress to find out the answer, and it turned out to be an artifact of groundwater sampling. Water steeping in fallen conifer needles was producing the apparent acidity.
Quite interesting. I did not know of that study result.
I have a firm memory from that time period of political brochures mailed by our local representative decrying the damage of acid rain. He demanded urgent political action of course. The front of the brochure was a photograph of a small shallow lake densely populated with dead trees. It turned out the lake was a beaver pond.
Yep. I don't know where to find the study document now. I know that after it appeared, the general reaction was "Oops! Never mind." So many hyped-up environmental crises were (and are) built on complete prevarication.
Close your eyes and it almost sounds like jessie waters - strange……
Anyway, cool to see!!! However, I hope this isn’t a limited hangout to expose some ‘bad shit’ and wash hands of said bad shit, but keep the really, really bad hidden & continuing.
My lilacs hardly bloomed at all in the last 3 years. Our Maples have few helicopter seeds anymore. I haven't seen a grasshopper in years. I haven't had a June bug in years. Seldom see a honey bee.
Wait a minute. He talked completely in generalities. He didn't say a word about sulfur dioxide. Which is outgassed copiously by volcanoes (sulfuric smell, anyone?), and is washed out of the air by rainfall.
Jet fuel, of necessity from its origin and refining process, contains trace amounts of sulfur in the form of mercaptans and other organic compounds. The Product Data Sheet (PDS) for ExxonMobil Jet A and Jet A-1 give weight limits on mercaptans as 0.003 %, and total sulfur as 0.03 %. Sulfur is present also as a component of antistatic agents that increase the fuel conductivity to prevent static discharge and unwanted fire. This component is dinonylnaphthylsulfonic acid (DINNSA, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinonylnaphthylsulfonic_acid). So, a kilogram of jet fuel (about 1200 cubic centimeters) will contain about 0.3 grams of sulfur in one form or another.
By comparison, the concentration of SO2 in the atmosphere is about 15 parts per billion (ppb). Taking this by weight to get a rough idea, where a cubic kilometer of atmosphere amounts to a billion cubic meters, at a kilogram/cubic meter density, there will be about 15 kilograms of SO2. The calculation of how much jet fuel is burned in the passage of a kilometer through the air is a bit tricky, but you can begin to see that the dilution factor is large and that anything added by airplane exhaust will be difficult to discern. I will give it a try. The 787-8 has a fuel load of 101,343 kilograms and an operating range of 13,530 kilometers. Assuming complete burnup (not expected), the fuel use would be 7.5 kg/km, for a sulfur deposition of about 2.5 grams per kilometer of travel, or approximately 0.0025 parts per billion if spread throughout a cubic kilometer. (I think I did the math correctly, but a thousand pardons if I missed a decimal point.)
Numbers are exhausting, but the point is that we already breathe SO2---and the levels are too small to have any importance. i grew up in a town that had a pulp & paper mill that made its own sulfuric acid to separate the lignin from the cellulose of the wood they used for pulp. There was some leakage from the chemical reactors and when a temperature inversion hit the town, one could smell the sulfur and feel the cough from the chest burn it created. It was annoying, but no one ever had any health effects. The aura of the SO2 around the plant was probably responsible for the yellowing and brittleness of old books in the used book shops nearby. I'm not recommending such levels as being healthy; they weren't. But when it is imperceptible (which it is, normally) it makes no difference. And what it would take to truly increase the sulfur dioxide levels would require perhaps an increase in sulfur mining of multiple times the present level. All these schemes of tinkering with the atmosphere come to the shoals of reality: the numbers are unfathomably huge.
So, very good for transparency, but don't be surprised if it turns out to be a nothingburger.
You enjoy presentimg yourself as an "expert" in this type of science.
Have you figured out the difference between extraterrestrial radiance and terrestrial irradiance yet?
*IMO you do know the difference, you just PRETEND that you don't because you can use that ridiculous argument to confuse people concerning this subject.
**You've used that EXACT strawman argument with me before, about a year ago, like its some sort of strange HABIT for you to confuse extraterrestrial radiance and terrestrial irradiance, despite your lnowledge.
The solar constant is about 1368 watts/square meter. The albedo of the Earth is about 30%, so what comes through to the Earth surface is about 1000 w/m2, provided the sun is directly overhead. The spectrum is essentially identical, so far as human sight and photovoltaics are concerned. (Hint: I work in aeronautics and astronautics, so this is Old Hat for me. The astronomers will tell you the same thing.)
The main difference between the two (aside from intensity) is that the atmosphere filters out most of the ultraviolet radiation, which is a good thing.
If you have some actual knowledge to impart, I would be glad to know it, but so far all you have demonstrated is a stumbling block over the solar spectrum. It turns out that I am an expert in this type of science. What more do you want?
Now, all this is educational. I am glad to share knowledge. But I don't think we are arguing over facts, so please relax.
It turns out that I am an expert in this type of science
The folks that told us the covid19 injections were "safe and effective" consider themselves to be experts. You talk out both sides of your mouth just like they do. Maybe thats why I'm so disgusted by you.
Who is paying for it? Who is behind it? Vitamin D levels of those in the northern U.S. are already very low without blocking out the sun further. This will also effect cattle and crops. There has to be a government agency that approved this. More depopulation efforts?
This was an absolute nothing urger from about a year ago and did not mention sulphur dioxide, and even if it did, sulphur dioxide is publicly disclosed already by the companies doing it. And he made no mention of going after any companies. What the hell is with this post??
SO2 does not easily become SO3. That requires high temperature combustion with oxygen. SO2 can react with H2O to become H2SO3, sulfurous acid, but a big study established that there were no "acid rains." Just an acidic buildup in groundwater soaking in conifer needles.
The way I remember it acid rain was the environmentalist's rallying cry of the 1980s. In the 90s they moved onto the Ozone Hole scare. I'd have to do some historical research to locate the exact transition time.
I think you’re right. I was born in 83 so I remember both but might have then mixed up. I remember an avid rain reference in Bill Murray’s “Christmas Carol” comedic remake “Scrooged” with people literally screaming as their faces burned from acid rain landing on them 😂
The sprayers and the funders should be fined hundreds of billions of dollars.
And executed in public for crimes against humanity.
Perhaps sentenced to a gas chamber of sulfur dioxide?
T’would be poetic
Just like witches...
I guess Lee Zeldin is now banned from GAW and is having his hands amputated.
https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASZVhOwES/official-gaw-banned-topic-update/
I was suspended for 2 days for a comment on CT. Whoever suspended said I embarrassed the board. I can take a wild guess who it was.
I was suspended too and called a “chemtard” funny you don’t see THAT MOD addressing they have been the retard
That mod freezes comments to his own post then expects anyone to read the drivel.
A mod that moonlights as a fag? The mods being against free speech is why I left this place. Cats five is a fag.
What is CT ?
Chemtrails.
u/#disgonbgud
Gulp. I guess I’ll say my good byes now. Thank’s for all the good times great info and sharing & caring everyone. ❤️❤️❤️❤️
🤭
:)
u/#seriouspopcorn
Perfectly placed. 👍
u/#FactChecked
Kek
Yes.
That is/was a disappointing stance.
Thank you Chief Zeldin, for confirming the mysterious contrails, were sulfur dioxide, a potent respiratory irritant affecting the lungs. Never smoked, but years ago, would walk everyday, continuously see chemtrails. Will always need a nebulizer, but praise God, it hasn't developed into cancer.
He didn't, and you are breathing it right now. As natural as volcanoes.
Probably not. The natural composition of a chemical, occuring in natural amounts, on a natural frequency of release IS NOT the same as an artificially recomposited, distributed, and concentrated release.
I don't see how you can prove that. Elsewhere on this page I went through the numbers, and there is far more SO2 in the atmosphere than any human means can deposit in a "concentrated" form. Gases immediately dissipate by dilution into the surrounding atmosphere, and SO2 does nothing of interest (as I witnessed from living in the neighborhood of a large local source). But you are breathing it right now, at 15 parts per billion concentration, completely harmless and unnoticeable.
But what you need is an AB test and we don't have an AV test meaning what are the levels in existence pre World War II or the start of you engineering. And what naturally occurred in the atmosphere. Secondly it does not automatically dissipate in the atmosphere or the trails wouldn't be lasting for hours upon hours upon hours which they do. And you cannot actually say it's completely harmless and unnoticeable. You would have to compare it to the rise of any other disease and affliction that has happened since the start of you engineering to correlate the data. That is like saying Plastics are perfectly harmless as Plastics are on their surface perfectly harmless however microplastics are not using that as an example. There was no crossing of the blood-brain barrier for microplastics before an accumulation of data. So you're taking a hey you're breathing it in right now and it's harmless as if that's the result of whether it is harmless or not there are things called cumulative effects and cumulative diseases.
Contrails are ice crystals and are a form of high altitude cloud. If the relative humidity is high, they will persist, just like the clouds. They are not sulfur dioxide, which is a gas, which dissipates rapidly by diffusion into the atmosphere. It is a common feature of volcanic eruptions and emissions, which we have known about for centuries.
Yes, I can say it is completely harmless and unnoticeable at a concentration of 15 parts per billion, which is the average composition of the atmosphere. (You obviously don't notice it.) I have lived in an environment of high concentration and, while it is unpleasant, there were no lasting effects on anyone or anything living. What I am saying is backed up by a lifetime of experience, and the lifetimes of others also living in the same world. It is pretty clear you have not researched the subject. It is the old story: ignorance => paranoia.
Plastics and inorganic natural compounds are far different from each other, and no proper analogy can be drawn. The devil is in the details.
Look, relax. We survive in the midst of plenty of volcanic emissions. Human production is about 4 times that, and still no problem. The bogeyman of acid rain was dispelled by proper research. Whole industries are built around the production of sulfuric acid, for which this is a precursor product. We understand it thoroughly. Every lit match produces sulfur dioxide, and we don't freak out about lighting matches.
https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASsdr7P0O/end-darpa/c/
More confusion and ignorance about contrails. It goes better if you can articulate what you want to say.
Why does it rain usually within. 24 hours after these planes finish hashtagging the sky? Why don't I have crickets or fireflies and a huge reduction of birds in my forest? What effect does turning sunny blue skies into gray skies have on the human psyche?
Memorial day is tomorrow. I turned on the heat yesterday. This rainy, cold spring is affecting crops.
The FAA needs to get involved. Those airplanes need flight clearances.
AND WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS EXPERIMENT? (caps intended)
These things appear when a more humid air mass has moved into the vicinity at high altitude. Such an air mass is a leading edge of a rain system that is moving in.
I have no idea what you are talking about regarding common animals. It makes no difference to us.
It does nothing to the human psyche. I live where we have constant clouds, contrails, and what-have-you. People are normal here.
Too bad you have a cold spring. Such things happen. I am having a nice, sunny, warm afternoon, but that is not necessarily the way to bet in my locality.
The airplanes have flight clearances. They are airliners. There is no experiment. These are commercial air flight operations. Their purpose is to get from point A to point B.
THIS IS WHY OUR SUN LOOK WHITE NOW!
Ten years ago I theorized that our sun looks white now instead of the warm orange I remember in my youth because they were spraying something that scattered orange light waves. Turns out Sulfur dioxide scatters ALL color wavelengths when aerosolized in the atmosphere.
Yes, people. Our sun used to look like a bright orange ball of fire in the sky. Now it looks like an LED lamp
Ive noticed everyone’s grass is looking different this year. I mean we’re almost in June. I was mowing almost twice a week last year at this time it was so thick and green. People will say drought as I’m in Tennessee. But there are no signs of a drought. Ponds are full, gardens are rich and green, trees and bushes blooming and growing like crazy, as usual. We get rain at least once a week. But the grass is 50% of what it was last year. Weird.
Mine too. I always have to mow my grass twice a week. Not this year. My pond is full and the soil is rich and damp. I mentioned this to my coworkers and they said they are hardly mowing.
My lawn isnt growing at all. But my neighbors who have shaded lawns all have nice lawns.
Upper E TN...i report the same. Although last 3 ish weeks have been sparce with rain
I recently got some night driving glasses that make the wptld look very yellow. As soon as I put them on during the day my eyes completely relaxed and I became calm inside. Like some un seen stress was released. They became so therapeutic I put them in for awhile now every day. I remember when the natural sunlight ight was more yellow than white. At least it seems to me n it was and now its this silvery light we live under. I may be just imagining it, but those glasses made me remember something more natural about the sun light than what we now seem to have. Im not kidding when Insay i get some instant relief when I put them on.
I've been here for 75 years and you are quite wrong. It is always orange at sunset and sunrise, but that is due to long light propagation paths through the atmosphere and normal atmospheric scattering that more strongly affects the blue end of the spectrum. During the normal course of the day, it is bright white. If it is orange at midday, that is due to particulate matter than scatters in a different spectrum than the Rayleigh scattering that produces a blue sky. The sun has always radiated in a black-body spectrum corresponding to about 5,772 degrees Kelvin of color temperature (i.e., white light, effective average). The first measurements using the results of quantum physics took place toward the end of the 19th century. By comparison, "Daylight" LED light bulbs have color temperatures of 5,000 to 6,500 K.
I don't know if you recall this, but it has generally been the case that truly tremendous explosive volcanic eruptions, which inject huge amounts of ash into the upper atmosphere, can result in very colorful sunsets all over the world, for considerable periods of time.
Normal atmosphere scatters all color wavelengths, but more so at the blue end of the spectrum. All gaseous molecules scatter by the Rayleigh process, which gives the same result (some exceptions are the halogens, which can be visible by distinctive colors).
Yeah. It used to NOT be, is my point. In the 70s, the sun appeared to be warm yellow all day, not just at dawn and sunset. My observation is that the light from the sun has been harsh white for the last 10 years. Entirely unlike the first 40 years of my life.
You're talking about extraterrestrial radiance. Atmospheric gases selectively absorb and scatter this light, turning it into terrestrial irradiance, whichbis what Im talking about. The light we see from.our sun AFTER it passes through our atmospere and us scattered in various ways.
You've never seen the extraterrestrial radiance of the sun. You've always seen it filtered through our atmosphere, just like most humans.
I'm talking about the way it appeared to me and everyone else in the 50s and onward. The radiance from the sun is only very slightly diminished by atmospheric scattering at midday. It looks the same at high altitude, where over half the atmosphere is beneath us.
Where do you live? What is the tendency for the local weather to carry windborne dust?
You attempted to "debunk" the info by telling us about the extraterrestrial radiance of the sun and how it hasn't changed, knowing full well that the atmosphere and the gases and particulates within it change that radiation profile constantly, changing the way we see light from the sun.
No, you attempted a stawman argument which failed miserably.
I'm afraid you are trying to pick an argument, but you have nothing to say. I was referring to the actual sunlight shining from the daytime sky, not "extraterrestrial" sunlight. If you are going to trap me, please quote me correctly. And I have pointed out that the color of the sun depends on the path length of the sunlight through the atmosphere (sunrise and sunset), so you are omitting my explanation of that effect. Sorry that you don't like what I have explained, but I am under sentence of expulsion if I argue, so I will not argue. Please have a good day.
You're entertaining.
H2S has been heavily regulated for the oil and gas industry for decades. Emission limits have curtailed production from some reservoirs.
So what the fuck is this demanding answers shit? Go shut the MFs down. The laws are on the books enforce them. I am so damned sick of we're investigating, we're demanding answers, we're looking in to it. The POS in office are sitting on their damned thumbs thinking when Trump is done they can go right back to the corrupt controlled system they had in place.
It is coming up on the time to water the tree of liberty, and string up some evil bastards across this world.
Ornaments! ... for the tree!!
...the ever growing "Pissed Off Parade"....
I’M MAD AS HELL…
Weather modification INC. RAS Weather INC Consultants
These are companies in the USA that seed clouds, in the past few years these companies have been seeding storm clouds in Texas and Oklahoma, that were already thunderstorms, making them dangerous storms with large hail, damaging winds, and deadly tornadoes, Podcaster @Monkeywerx has the receipts of their flight history,
So can it be considered official now? Are chemtrails back on the menu?
Shhhh…you are not allowed to spell it out!! kek
You’re only allowed to call it cloud seeding for some reason
Hold on a second. Did he say sulfur dioxide? I am experiencing flashback trauma. Those who lived through the 1980s remember sulfur dioxide as environmental enemy number one, pounded into us by the mass media year after year. Because acid rain.
The idea was that SO2 combines with H2O to produce H2SO3, sulfurous acid. There was a huge study commissioned by Congress to find out the answer, and it turned out to be an artifact of groundwater sampling. Water steeping in fallen conifer needles was producing the apparent acidity.
Quite interesting. I did not know of that study result.
I have a firm memory from that time period of political brochures mailed by our local representative decrying the damage of acid rain. He demanded urgent political action of course. The front of the brochure was a photograph of a small shallow lake densely populated with dead trees. It turned out the lake was a beaver pond.
Yep. I don't know where to find the study document now. I know that after it appeared, the general reaction was "Oops! Never mind." So many hyped-up environmental crises were (and are) built on complete prevarication.
Close your eyes and it almost sounds like jessie waters - strange……
Anyway, cool to see!!! However, I hope this isn’t a limited hangout to expose some ‘bad shit’ and wash hands of said bad shit, but keep the really, really bad hidden & continuing.
April 15th, 2026. Posted 5 weeks ago
My lilacs hardly bloomed at all in the last 3 years. Our Maples have few helicopter seeds anymore. I haven't seen a grasshopper in years. I haven't had a June bug in years. Seldom see a honey bee.
The spraying is killing our planet.
Wait a minute. He talked completely in generalities. He didn't say a word about sulfur dioxide. Which is outgassed copiously by volcanoes (sulfuric smell, anyone?), and is washed out of the air by rainfall.
Jet fuel, of necessity from its origin and refining process, contains trace amounts of sulfur in the form of mercaptans and other organic compounds. The Product Data Sheet (PDS) for ExxonMobil Jet A and Jet A-1 give weight limits on mercaptans as 0.003 %, and total sulfur as 0.03 %. Sulfur is present also as a component of antistatic agents that increase the fuel conductivity to prevent static discharge and unwanted fire. This component is dinonylnaphthylsulfonic acid (DINNSA, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinonylnaphthylsulfonic_acid). So, a kilogram of jet fuel (about 1200 cubic centimeters) will contain about 0.3 grams of sulfur in one form or another.
By comparison, the concentration of SO2 in the atmosphere is about 15 parts per billion (ppb). Taking this by weight to get a rough idea, where a cubic kilometer of atmosphere amounts to a billion cubic meters, at a kilogram/cubic meter density, there will be about 15 kilograms of SO2. The calculation of how much jet fuel is burned in the passage of a kilometer through the air is a bit tricky, but you can begin to see that the dilution factor is large and that anything added by airplane exhaust will be difficult to discern. I will give it a try. The 787-8 has a fuel load of 101,343 kilograms and an operating range of 13,530 kilometers. Assuming complete burnup (not expected), the fuel use would be 7.5 kg/km, for a sulfur deposition of about 2.5 grams per kilometer of travel, or approximately 0.0025 parts per billion if spread throughout a cubic kilometer. (I think I did the math correctly, but a thousand pardons if I missed a decimal point.)
Numbers are exhausting, but the point is that we already breathe SO2---and the levels are too small to have any importance. i grew up in a town that had a pulp & paper mill that made its own sulfuric acid to separate the lignin from the cellulose of the wood they used for pulp. There was some leakage from the chemical reactors and when a temperature inversion hit the town, one could smell the sulfur and feel the cough from the chest burn it created. It was annoying, but no one ever had any health effects. The aura of the SO2 around the plant was probably responsible for the yellowing and brittleness of old books in the used book shops nearby. I'm not recommending such levels as being healthy; they weren't. But when it is imperceptible (which it is, normally) it makes no difference. And what it would take to truly increase the sulfur dioxide levels would require perhaps an increase in sulfur mining of multiple times the present level. All these schemes of tinkering with the atmosphere come to the shoals of reality: the numbers are unfathomably huge.
So, very good for transparency, but don't be surprised if it turns out to be a nothingburger.
A favorite word of the Gas Lighters
I don't understand your reference. Can you please explain more particularly? I enjoy every word in the dictionary, don't you?
You enjoy presentimg yourself as an "expert" in this type of science.
Have you figured out the difference between extraterrestrial radiance and terrestrial irradiance yet?
*IMO you do know the difference, you just PRETEND that you don't because you can use that ridiculous argument to confuse people concerning this subject.
**You've used that EXACT strawman argument with me before, about a year ago, like its some sort of strange HABIT for you to confuse extraterrestrial radiance and terrestrial irradiance, despite your lnowledge.
I wasn't going to ignore it this time.
The solar constant is about 1368 watts/square meter. The albedo of the Earth is about 30%, so what comes through to the Earth surface is about 1000 w/m2, provided the sun is directly overhead. The spectrum is essentially identical, so far as human sight and photovoltaics are concerned. (Hint: I work in aeronautics and astronautics, so this is Old Hat for me. The astronomers will tell you the same thing.)
The main difference between the two (aside from intensity) is that the atmosphere filters out most of the ultraviolet radiation, which is a good thing.
If you have some actual knowledge to impart, I would be glad to know it, but so far all you have demonstrated is a stumbling block over the solar spectrum. It turns out that I am an expert in this type of science. What more do you want?
Now, all this is educational. I am glad to share knowledge. But I don't think we are arguing over facts, so please relax.
The folks that told us the covid19 injections were "safe and effective" consider themselves to be experts. You talk out both sides of your mouth just like they do. Maybe thats why I'm so disgusted by you.
You know what? My Apple spell check doesn't recognize 'geoengineering' as a real word.
Don't worry my ducking android is a piece of ship too.
Is this why there is a shortage of sulfur for fertilizer????
Is there? Since about 2000, the U.S. production of sulfur has been about 8-9 million metric tons per year. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sulfur_production_in_the_United_States There has been a slow decline during that period.
Who is paying for it? Who is behind it? Vitamin D levels of those in the northern U.S. are already very low without blocking out the sun further. This will also effect cattle and crops. There has to be a government agency that approved this. More depopulation efforts?
This was an absolute nothing urger from about a year ago and did not mention sulphur dioxide, and even if it did, sulphur dioxide is publicly disclosed already by the companies doing it. And he made no mention of going after any companies. What the hell is with this post??
How about you shut off the money. Seize the aircraft amd arrest the pilots and people involved.
Regulations are woke af. We don't need to be protected by the government like the left wants. Trump is anti regulation. MAGA is anti regulation.
Im as anti-regulation as they come, so I'm for an outright ban on atmospheric engineering.
You can't say 'hey, I own a plane and all the stuff to spread whatever I want and you can't stop me because anti-regulations.'
Thats how corpses turn up in the oddest places.
Rather than that extreme, I'd settle for a ban.
It would be nice. But corporations are making record profits and it's a golden age. I don't make the rules.
Are you saying Israel should be able to poison us because regulations are bad?
Trump protects us, its not like that.
So you want them to be allowed to turn the whole planet into a gas chamber?
The rich need to be able to get richer. I don't make the rules.
Speaking about sudden death. NASCAR Suoer Star Kyle Bush died suddenly just a few days before he was suppose to race.
Let me guess… Israel?
Dont forget sulphur dioxide S02 will then oxidise to suphuric acid H2SO4... so the added problem of acid rains.
SO2 does not easily become SO3. That requires high temperature combustion with oxygen. SO2 can react with H2O to become H2SO3, sulfurous acid, but a big study established that there were no "acid rains." Just an acidic buildup in groundwater soaking in conifer needles.
What is this, 1992? Who says “acid rain” anymore? 😆
Ok but seriously, maybe slightly more acidic PH but the term “acid rain” was SUCH a 90s liberal fearmongering term.
“Captain…..PLANET!!!”
The way I remember it acid rain was the environmentalist's rallying cry of the 1980s. In the 90s they moved onto the Ozone Hole scare. I'd have to do some historical research to locate the exact transition time.
I think you’re right. I was born in 83 so I remember both but might have then mixed up. I remember an avid rain reference in Bill Murray’s “Christmas Carol” comedic remake “Scrooged” with people literally screaming as their faces burned from acid rain landing on them 😂