1
BadMamaJama 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not out of US pocket but I suggest give them a bus pass. Otherwise these people will turn to theft to survive.

2
BadMamaJama 2 points ago +2 / -0

Geneva Convention - medical facilities off limits? 'Protection of hospitals. Civilian hospitals organized to give care to the wounded and sick, the infirm and maternity cases, may in no circumstances be the object of attack, but shall at all times be respected and protected by the Parties to the conflict.'

2
BadMamaJama 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gayle King is the taller black woman. The remaining 3 are a filmmaker, biologist and astronaut.

3
BadMamaJama 3 points ago +3 / -0

Very nice to see Vance involved in everything as much as he seems to be If Pres Trump is incapacitated for any reason, there shouldn't be even a blip to continue this agenda. Good, strong cabinet members all with marching orders in place. Contrast with Harris and Biden administration. I don't think Biden & Harris liked each other from the get go, and she certainly wasn't groomed to step in to Biden's role.

0
BadMamaJama 0 points ago +1 / -1

What is he asking people to do? Families on welfare are given incentives to have larger families in order to apply for 'ssi' checks or greater benefits. Women are given incentives by the welfare program to stay unmarried (benefits/support from govt vs no benefits). Breakdown via slow erosion of the family unit is a large part of the cause, as has been pointed out for decades. And this behavior is not limited by race (the free benefits game, I mean.) Family erosion and the glorification of thug culture, neither of which were/are organic are the cause.

2
BadMamaJama 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ok - regular routine, contact the kid's psychiatrist, see what meds he's been taking for years.

1
BadMamaJama 1 point ago +1 / -0

Him being an integral part of 'the plan' is the only reason I can see that he's not part of the formal Trump administration, at the very least as an advisor. ( True, he probably couldn't be confirmed thru congress as any of the 'higher' positions.) Else, he would be going about on cable sniping about "decisions not made', etc., and throwing out double-edged compliments as Newt did his first go-round when his relationship with Trump didn't work out for being in the administration.

2
BadMamaJama 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree with this for 'recordkeeping' purposes, however, the opportunities for scholarships, advancements, etc. are lost forever.

1
BadMamaJama 1 point ago +1 / -0

Please refresh me on what we suspect he has done? The only things that come to mind are (1) possible paperwork issues with adopting his now grown kids from Ireland and (2) being in some 'secret' judge club along with 2 other SC justices (both libs) which is not illegal. Worst case, the 'club' might seem to make him and the others impartial, which would be an ethics violation. Sure, we don't like the way he has fallen in several of his last decisions but I cannot see them reaching the level of a successful impeachment or removal. I think we just have bad luck on that member with regards to our causes.

3
BadMamaJama 3 points ago +3 / -0

Something would have to happen to Roberts. He has it for life or until he steps down from the bench from what I understand. Chief J is not just a designation, it's an actual job-titled-position that is not transferable to another Justice 'slot'. (that's really poorly worded but hope it makes some sense)

5
BadMamaJama 5 points ago +5 / -0

Tucker Carlson interviewed Scott Bessent (Treas Secy) last week and Tucker asked him if DOGE's work and tariffs are going to be enough to remove the income tax and Bessent's answer was that it could relieve a lot of the burden from the individual taxpayer. I listened closely, 'eliminate' wasn't on the table, at least in this interview anyway. video 1 hour long approx. TC and Bessent intv

Would also make sense, though, to dangle the IRS relief or elimination of income tax closer to midterm elections and gain the bigger bang for the buck. Not only would that get the less-motivated voters to the polls for a midterm election but also might get voters to examine exactly who they would be putting into office or 'showing the door' with the midterm elections.

1
BadMamaJama 1 point ago +1 / -0

Haha - and Easter worshippers. Thanks, H... (not) a future president.

3
BadMamaJama 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think Trump will want to require them to lift the ban on our beef and some other things that they ban. I can understand their issue not wanting to bring in items they have already banned due to health concerns (several of our processed food items with certain dyes and fake sweeteners, etc). Their beef ban is because we had a few instances (Idk exact numbers) of mad cow and they have had none, so they want to take no chances.

2
BadMamaJama 2 points ago +2 / -0

...and, just like that, all of those tariff protestors whining about Trump's tariffs raising prices will have to go back to Soros for new marching orders.

2
BadMamaJama 2 points ago +2 / -0

Should have been Canadian Parliament Locked Up.

3
BadMamaJama 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think the self-deport group will greatly increase once the SSA stops the free benefits for the illegal SSN holders. There might be a lull for a couple of months while the people look for alternatives but if Trump enforces things correctly (I-9 reviews, E Verify usage, etc) there will be greener pastures elsewhere for these people. And... if they self-deport, they are eligible to apply for return to US under legal immigration work authorizations,etc., if/when the employment demand is increased under increased manufacturing, etc. Anyway, that's how the plan is supposed to play out.

view more: Next ›