4
tchouk 4 points ago +4 / -0

The point was that it's not 187k.

Every single month this year has been downgraded after the fact. They tell you "200k jump" and then two months later it turns out it was like 100k in reality

2
tchouk 2 points ago +4 / -2

The greatest thing about Trump is how he is destroying the system by just existing.

He's gonna be killed, IMHO, which is going to be the final thing that smashes the thing to pieces

2
tchouk 2 points ago +2 / -0

The point is that you don't create the wave, because, again, that assumes entirely too much skill and competence.

We've all seen the very best of the best effort the establishment can do in terms of psyop, and that's Covid and it's been an absolute disaster for them as a psyop. Again, decrepit child rapists aren't some genius Machiavellian masterminds.

The point is that you see a wave and throw money at it to take complete control.

This is a different process entirely even if the result is the same.

2
tchouk 2 points ago +3 / -1

This is completely retarded.

If anyone could control what goes viral and plan an actual successful psyop this way on demand, they would do it all the time. That's not how it works, because they are way too decrepit, incompetent and retarded to actual plan this.

What you do is wait for something real to happen and then you buy it out. All that takes is money, which is what they have in abandon

2
tchouk 2 points ago +2 / -0

The idea is that it would reduce child mortality which would reduce the number of children a woman chooses to have. This idea is pushed because civilized countries with low child mortality have way lower fertility rates.

Of course, there is no actual proof that it is specifically child mortality that is the biggest factor of women deciding not to have 10 children and have 3-4 of them die.

5
tchouk 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's about competition of resources amongst our descendants which is about control over resources in the future

No one in the West is having children, but everyone in the West consumes way more resources than the people who are having children. And the oligarchs running the West take the cream off the top by controlling the resources used by the West.

That's not a viable long-term situation for control of resources.

3
tchouk 3 points ago +6 / -3

Because Lincoln was the original fedboy.

I can't say this was bad necessarily, because the nation Lincoln created is stronger geopolitically than the Union he inherited, but the two are nothing alike.

Lincoln literally destroyed the nation created by the Founding Fathers and then turned the ruins into a federal state with an uncompromising all-powerful central government.

The very existence of the DS is possible only because of this.

On the other hand, you don't defeat the likes of the Imperial Japan or the Soviet Union without a strong and authoritarian federal center

Good or bad just isn't nuanced enough to describe America's first dictator

5
tchouk 5 points ago +6 / -1

Lincoln literally destroyed the spirit of the Union. The nation went from States United voluntarily to some sort of proto-empire controlled from Washington.

It's not clear that a voluntary union of states could have survived the tumultuous times that followed anyway, and the empire Lincoln built obviously has way more geopolitical power. The union before Lincoln would have never become the world's hegemon in the same way and the world would be very different. Perhaps much worse.

Anyway, it's strange that the guy, siting on his throne in Washington, isn't a more controversial figure.

1
tchouk 1 point ago +1 / -0

We're obviously using oil way quicker than it can be renewed, but that whole idea that we'd be swimming in oil is bullshit.

Obviously the process can only happen under very specific conditions. It's not the continental shelf sweating it out.

Think about a hot spring. You can pump out the smelly sulfurous water, make a pool or drink of it or whatever, and it will come back and rather quickly. But not all water everywhere is smelly sulfur hot spring water.

And fwiw, places like Saudi Arabia were practically swimming in oil, with pools of it found on the surface

1
tchouk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right, and he didn't get a bullet to the head and spill his brains all over his wife.

5
tchouk 5 points ago +6 / -1

Aquifers are also a renewable resource, doesn't mean they don't run dry if you pump more than the rate of renewal.

There is no question at all that the EROI of oil has fallen drastically and it's not going to go up unless we stop pumping XXX years and then restart.

And EROI is all that matters. Oil was super cheap in terms of energy required to get more oil. This cheapness this is the source of 100% of our abundance for the last 100 years. And the more we pump, the lower the EROI, the lower the abundance even if it comes back all the time

That said, sun or wind energy has even lower EROI, so that obviously isn't any sort of solution.

5
tchouk 5 points ago +5 / -0

Kennedy was a big nuisance to the various powerful, unelected, heads of powerful government forces. So they had a get-together and had him removed.

The next guy wasn't stupid and worked together with the various powerful people and not against them. This is the reason for the escalation in Vietnam like a month after Kennedy was killed, among other things.

The rest of the details don't really matter. It's literally a tale as old as time.

1
tchouk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Duh.

I mean, yeah, the fact that its said out loud is a big deal, but we all know they did it, and have always known.

We just don't want to know that the whole system is completely illegitimate and has been for decades.

1
tchouk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or the degradation of society causes degenerates to grow like mushrooms after a summer rainstorm

7
tchouk 7 points ago +7 / -0

You have to prepare fraud in advance if you want to make it look believable.

They misjudged just how popular Trump would be, so they didn't prepare enough fraud in 2016.

Same thing in 2020, but this time they didn't care about making it believable

3
tchouk 3 points ago +3 / -0

People join the military voluntarily, but not for nothing and not just to protect the country. Most join because it offers a step up in life.

Once those people get deployed by shitstain politicians for their evil shitstained goals, it is correct to do your duty and follow orders.

But doing your duty and following shitstain orders, or any orders, doesn't make someone a hero.

Soldiers deserve all the empathy in the world for doing the hard and supremely dangerous job they do. And the government should do much more to support them, especially after they are damages and no longer as useful.

But calling this whole sordid affair 'heroism' and blindly supporting the system with a loud hurrah because the individuals in the system deserve to be supported is just enabling the system to be more evil and corrupt

1
tchouk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Science-schmience

This is a bunch of corrupt evil asshats giving themselves and their banker buddies literally trillions of dollars at the expense of everyone else.

What is she going to do, admit the truth? "Yeah, we fucked you raw, but see, I get my own jet and yacht that I use to get to the sex island where I have orgies with underaged sex-slaves, so fuck you, I really don't care"

It's so easy to pretend to be stupid when people accept stupidity as a valid argument for malice.

1
tchouk 1 point ago +1 / -0

From the storming of the defensive lines without air superiority

3
tchouk 3 points ago +3 / -0

It wasn't actually an error. They were counting today's replacement cost because they planned to replace the stuff they sent to Ukraine. This wasn't a mistake.

Now that it's turning out to be way more expensive than planned, they're pulling a budgeting trick.

The stuff will still have to be replaced, but now the replacement cost will be taken from taxpayers through a different additional "this isn't for Ukraine" budget.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›