Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

429
President Trump retruthed a post using Government data to show 2020 election results are impossible and Biden could have only received 39 million votes. We’ve seen similar analyses before, but POTUS doesn’t do random posts, there’s always a target. Hope it’s a sign the truth will be revealed soon! (media.greatawakening.win)
posted 2 years ago by TSearch 2 years ago by TSearch +429 / -0
88 comments download share
88 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (88)
sorted by:
▲ 51 ▼
– QandAistheWay 51 points 2 years ago +51 / -0

This is why their educational agenda includes dumbing down in mathematics as much as possible.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– BigJilm01 15 points 2 years ago +15 / -0

Idiocracy

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– TheTroof 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

Bingo! Been saying it for years. Asking the question, actually. Why are they dumbing kids down? Well, if the last three years haven't answered that question for you, you're a dumbed down idiot yourself. This was EXACTLY their plan. Dumb people down so much they can't possibly grasp the concept of numbers not adding up. I clearly remember them saying math was subjective, and if a student thought 1+1=3, well, that's the correct number for that student. Well, here we are. We have a generation of adults who don't understand how 81 million votes is impossible if the other candidate got 76 million votes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Buttery 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

With what math did you confirm the 115 million value?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– QandAistheWay 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

You know, I didn't confirm anything, but I will now. I'm glad you asked!

The US Census reported 168,300,000 registered voters in 2020. If you take 69% of those registered voters, you get 116,000,000 votes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Buttery 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

69% of registered voters or 69% of eligible voters turned out?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– PhDinNY 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

Only registered voters are allowed to vote (at least legally vote).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Buttery 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

And voter turnout uses eligibility (by age, NOT registration) to calculate percentage.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– TomPaineSentMe 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

The US Election Commission has these numbers

209 million registered 161 million votes.

Some highlights from the 2020 EAVS:

This election saw the highest turnout of any federal general election recorded by EAVS to date with 67.7% of the citizen voting age population casting ballots that were counted.   More than 209 million people were active registered voters for the 2020 general election and more than 161 million voters cast ballots that were counted for this election. 

https://www.eac.gov/news/2021/08/16/us-election-assistance-commission-releases-2020-election-administration-and-voting

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– RabidRed 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Check the previous 3 presidential election got counts. Narrow margin in total votes. Averaged 128,500,000 those 3 years less the 81,000,000 votes Trump received, Biden received the difference. How much is that? 49,500,000

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Buttery 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

So.. making an estimated guess based on values you accepted previously to come up with a value to replace the one you now don't accept?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– HELLOGITMO 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Math is hard. -Barbi

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 31 ▼
– AngelCole 31 points 2 years ago +31 / -0

Only the Lord knows how many of our elections have been fraudulent.😤

permalink save report block reply
▲ 29 ▼
– Nitrojunkie72 29 points 2 years ago +29 / -0

All of them

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– InmatesRunTheAsylum 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

That was my guess too.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– tchouk 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

No, just the ones where there was a risk of someone anti-swamp winning

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– TSearch [S] 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

Truth! Using the same data there is no way the 2016 totals are correct either.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TomPaineSentMe 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

https://www.eac.gov/news/2021/08/16/us-election-assistance-commission-releases-2020-election-administration-and-voting

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– catipillar 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

Trump winning was the only thing that made the think MAYBE the elections aren’t bullshit.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– tchouk 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

You have to prepare fraud in advance if you want to make it look believable.

They misjudged just how popular Trump would be, so they didn't prepare enough fraud in 2016.

Same thing in 2020, but this time they didn't care about making it believable

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– XlntOldBowler 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

In other words they cheated harder after their miscalculation of the "Anybody but Hillary crowd" as well as Trump's appeal to those who actually heard what he said. After watching him live up to the words in just about every possible way, it is inconceivable to me that he could lose unless they cheated harder. They cheat every single time. To what degree is the only thing that changes. If we have an election in 2024 at all, they will have to cheat all the way from 2022 through January 21, 2025. It sure appears they are going to try to do just that. Inquiring minds watch with great interest. I hope the movie(s) end happily for us. I trust in my creator and myself. My country is floundering on a heavy sea in a craft taking on water at a startling pace. The world as I have known it hangs in the balance.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– faxandu 20 points 2 years ago +20 / -0

I'm upping my prediction for 2024. Biden gets 1 billion votes.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– rayw_wwg1wga 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

What I want to see: Biden found guilty of treason, disqualified from the race entirely. Retroactively removed from both 2020 and 2024.

if they can expunge the false impeachments, they can expunge a false candidate / foreign dignitary resident

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– O9er 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

After he and hunter use that pound and half of cocaine that was found at the white house.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– TSearch [S] 18 points 2 years ago +18 / -0

u/#q2479

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Buttery 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

That meme. Illegal immigrants flock to large urban areas, and large urban areas vote democrat. Can't those two facts coexist without being connected?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– TSearch [S] 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

I think if Dems didn’t fight to the bitter end to block voter ID the argument that correlation is not causation is valid. But, when you have multiple points of correlation like no voter ID, refusing to release voter registration data, etc. the plausibility they are using illegal immigration as part of election rigging is plausible.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– rayw_wwg1wga 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

2000 Mules, Mike Lindell, Sidney Powell revealed to us, they did all of the above.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Buttery 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Would you agree that poor people are less likely to have voter id and poor people tend to vote democrat?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– TSearch [S] 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

Do you think people can receive Government assistance without identification? Or file their tax refunds to receive tax credits without identification? I think it is virtually impossible to exist in society without identification. And, if poor people somehow do struggle to get ID why in the world would it not be part of poverty relief to provide them with identification?

So, to answer your question no, I think the vast majority have identification, but the myth is perpetuated that they do not because it is a necessary part in rigging elections. It has been for a very long time.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Buttery 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Well, apparently you can get assistance without,

Hargie Randall, 72, was born in his family’s home in Huntsville, Tex., and has lived in the state his entire life. Randall, now living in Houston’s low-income Fifth Ward neighborhood, has several health problems and such poor eyesight that he is legally blind. He can’t drive and has to ask others for rides.

After Texas implemented its new law, Randall went to the Department of Public Safety (the Texas agency that handles driver’s licenses and identification cards) three times to try to get a photo ID to vote. Each time Randall was told he needed different items. First, he was told he needed three forms of identification. He came back and brought his Medicaid card, bills and a current voter registration card from voting in past elections.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/getting-a-photo-id-so-you-can-vote-is-easy-unless-youre-poor-black-latino-or-elderly/2016/05/23/8d5474ec-20f0-11e6-8690-f14ca9de2972_story.html

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ILoveIvermectin 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Flock? Or lured?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Buttery 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Lured because otherwise they would... move to rural areas?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AReckoningIsComing 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

why is front door capitalised like it's an agency or organisation??

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– XlntOldBowler 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Ahhhhh, the blue blister map. I live in one of those and I think it is about to burst.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– repeatoffender 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

They don’t need illegals to vote. They just need the voter registrations to grow so they can print more fraudulent ballots at 3am.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– russiah 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

Only Abrams sisters can handle that kind of loads

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– dty6 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 that's funny

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– CommiesGetTheRope 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Stacey can hold thousands between her front teeth alone.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Oh_Well_ian 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

In the 2008 DNC Primary, FJB DROPPED OUT after receiving less than 1% support in Iowa.

https://www.politico.com/story/2008/01/dodd-biden-drop-out-after-iowa-defeat-007705

FJB got less than 20 Million legit votes in 2020.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– yuppa 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

So how to fix? If they just shut everything down and add however many votes they need to win, with media and legal system saying nyah nyah, is it even possible for the will of the people to elect their choice?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– TSearch [S] 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

It seems like post 2479 is saying the proof exists. So the question is why the delay in revealing it?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Thwok 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

Why jail just the grunts?

It takes time to trace out and quietly force out the heads of the operation.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– LongTimeListener 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

We have really taken to our conditioning. Delayed gratification to achieve a larger goal and a bigger prize just isnt in our programming any longer. I want that 15 cents right now, Im not waiting 2 years for 100 million dollars.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– yuppa 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

I think anyone with s brain should know 2020 was stolen, my fear is what's gonna stop it from happening again.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– LongTimeListener 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

Same thing that did in 2016.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– queue-anon 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

This. If white hats prevented the steal in 2016…. And then took control for the past 7 years, dismantling deep state cabal power, launching the space force… etc. Imagine how easy they can stop the steal in 2024!

If the election is stolen again it’s because white hats are allowing it in order to push people to the precipice. At the rate things are going I expect WHs to allow it to be stolen again.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– GreatNipples 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

I asked my husband this morning just how many millions of votes they had to fabricate to steal the 2020 election. Trump draws crowds of 50k plus to his rallies even now, Biden had empty circles and hid in the basement before the election. I bet it was a monumental feat of fudging away our freedom.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– AReckoningIsComing 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Well they literally had the hut the count down in the dead of night to print more ballots, extended election day into election week and a half on a few states and then banned you from social media when trying to question any of it!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– TSearch [S] 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/110654364794580875

https://truthsocial.com/@Bill_Looman/110646369411292891

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Deplorable_in_PA 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

39 mil for Potato Joe just about makes sense. A lot of Bernie bros got screwed (again) in the primary by the DNC. A big number of them likely sat it out. Shrillary would tick enough boxes for them to vote for her, but getting Gropey Joe as the nom would have been like us getting Jeb or Romney.

The only real voting bloc for Gropey would be hardcore dems who vote in every election, plus the firm dem base who wanted Trump out no matter what. Gropey was underperforming even Shrillary among minority voters says a lot too. Blacks (especially) and Hispanics are a big part of the dem base. Dems have long lost working class white union voters. There wasn't a huge war or recession, no real reason for the normies to want Trump gone.

Add to it that Potato Joe is just about the worst candidate the dems ever put up. Obvious mental capacity issues, but he was never that exciting in his prime. Especially with indies and moderates. I could see if the Dems put up RFK or Bernie, it would have been different.

So yeah, 39 mil would just about make sense when you take everything into context.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Magpi 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

lol "Gropey" - from the movie Snow White and the Seven Groomers

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– nakedjay 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Truth user got the number wrong. 66.8% is the percentage of the population that voted, not the percentage of registered voters that voted. 168 million reported as registered in 2020. 155 million vote total for Trump and Biden. That would be 92% voter turnout, which is absurdly high and shady AF.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– TSearch [S] 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

I think your right. The rigging was based on using the votes of anyone eligible to vote whether they were registered or not. Saying 91.7% of registered voters turned out is highly implausible, but 66.8% of eligible voters turn out sounds more plausible.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TomPaineSentMe 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

https://www.eac.gov/news/2021/08/16/us-election-assistance-commission-releases-2020-election-administration-and-voting

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– nakedjay 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Thanks for sharing this data.

More than 209 million people were active registered voters for the 2020 general election and more than 161 million voters cast ballots that were counted for this election. 

According to this, the turnout would be roughly 77%. That's still a very high and suspicious turnout number. Considering past elections the turnout was in the 50-60% range.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– swampwarrior67 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Not all who voted fall into the registered group, and some millions registered day-of or did not report registration status.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– anonymooser 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

I think this is misunderstanding that federal figure as being percentage of registered voters, when it seems to actually be percentage of citizens 18 and older.

The 2020 presidential election had the highest voter turnout of the 21st century, with 66.8% of citizens 18 years and older voting in the election

https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2021/2020-presidential-election-voting-and-registration-tables-now-available.html

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– TSearch [S] 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

I think your right on point. The rigging was based on using the votes of anyone eligible to vote whether they were registered or not.
Saying 91.7% of registered voters turned out is hard to believe, but 66.8% of eligible voters turn out sounds more plausible.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– swampwarrior67 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Calculating this as a percentage of registered voters is not accurate because many people register on election day and would not be included in that count. For example, large percentages of 18, 19, and 20-year-olds who voted for the first time.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TSearch [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

My understanding is this data is based on the Census Bureau asking people if they voted and if they were registered to vote. That would capture day of registration.

These data come from the 2020 Current Population Survey Voting and Registration Supplement for the November 2020 presidential election, which surveyed the civilian noninstitutionalized population in the United States.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– TomPaineSentMe 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

https://www.eac.gov/news/2021/08/16/us-election-assistance-commission-releases-2020-election-administration-and-voting

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– swampwarrior67 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Citizen population 18+ was 231k. This times 66.8 (the real official turnout number) produces around 155 million. The math is sound and this post is stupid.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TomPaineSentMe 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

https://www.eac.gov/news/2021/08/16/us-election-assistance-commission-releases-2020-election-administration-and-voting

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– djmarcone 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

math is racist tho so, nvm

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– NoApologyTour 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

That’s assuming that Trumps true total was 81 million… they suppressed his vote and flipped a ton as well.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– swampwarrior67 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

This is using the wrong numbers.

Official turnout numbers were reported as 66.8% of citizens, which is around 155 million. This post seems to be taking 69% (a number I cannot find on any official counts) of the number of registered voters, 168 million, which gets to the 115 million count.

So this person is an idiot or trying to mislead you intentionally.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TSearch [S] 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

The guy definitely makes an erroneous calculation, one that President Trump and his team would easily catch. So why retruth it? Is it because the Census Bureau data is claiming 91.7% of registered voters turned out? That doesn’t seem plausible at all, and the only turnout percentage that matters is registered voters.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TomPaineSentMe 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

https://www.eac.gov/news/2021/08/16/us-election-assistance-commission-releases-2020-election-administration-and-voting

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TSearch [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Caught these two statements in the Crnsus Bureau report:

Despite COVID-19 concerns, 155 million people turned out for the 2020 presidential election. However, 4% (552,500) of registered nonvoters reported not voting due to their concerns about the COVID-19 pandemic.

The most common reason for not voting among registered nonvoters was they were not interested in the election (17.6%). Other reasons included not liking the candidates or campaign issues, being too busy and forgetting to vote.

This means at least 21.6% of registered voters did not vote. I say at least because we are not given a value for the other reasons listed in the second statement. So 78.4% or 131,955 million registered voters voted. Deducting President Trump’s 74 million leaves Biden with 57,955 million registered voters.

So the OP on Truth is wrong in the numbers he used, but if we dig deeper into the Census Bureau report, it still supports the conclusion Joe Biden did not receive 81 million registered, legal votes. He received roughly 58 million.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– leemoz 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

As long as I have voted the numbers never seem to match up after an election. But until now no president has ever questioned it, because they are a part of it. That is why we need Trump in 2024. Scorched earth cleaning of the deep swamp!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Tralfaz 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

I think that’s because because women’s voter are only counted as 70% of a vote. Checkmate conspiracy theorists!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Dumbass101 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

And... We knew this three years ago.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 4chanfanclub 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

So when are the mass arrests going to happen? How many people are involved? 10,000 people? Poll workers, ballot handlers, councilmen ignoring basic math, politicians turning the eye, state and federal prosecutors, news outlets and the list goes on. Is it really in the 100,000 of thousands that should go to the gitmo? This level of corruption is beyond imagination. How many people go along to get along. Were they afraid to stand up and lose their livelihood. Now they can wonder if their financial gains is worth their life in prison or execution.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– LukyNumbrSlevinteen 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Caught the swamp. I caught them ALL. Add the medical field to it, Governors, judges, police, anyone playing the constitution breaking game.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– JackieDaytona74 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

A large part of my job is research and analysis, including statistical research. Now, please take my words with a pinch of salt as there are people far more experienced in performing statistical analysis on elections than I. My analysis projects are typically not focused on election data.

However, my work was the result of many hours of analyzing numerous data points and I was able to get a couple of apolitical & educated analysts to look over my work and verify that my methodology was sound.

As best I can tell, the only states that President Trump might have lost are: Hawaii Vermont New York Massachusetts Rhode Island Maryland

That's it. He won every other state and the vast majority he won comfortably. He even won California. Not by a blowout, but he won it.

As to the states I listed that President Trump might have lost, New York & Rhode Island are really close. Close enough that he might have actually won them.

Hawaii, Vermont, Mass & Maryland were close but a slight edge to Mashed Potato Brains.

This was a popular vote blowout that exceeded even the 1984 election.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TomPaineSentMe 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

https://www.eac.gov/news/2021/08/16/us-election-assistance-commission-releases-2020-election-administration-and-voting

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– JackieDaytona74 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Not sure what you want me to take from this, TPSM?

Although as an aside, I did use that link for some of the data in my analysis, specifically the majority of Americans supposedly voting by mail instead of in person.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– dty6 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

I'm ready now! Let's go! Today is a good day!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy