I'm tech literate and nothing they said was complicated or hard to understand at all. I wonder if this is what the MSM is saying to keep people from watching it themselves.
Yep I noticed that and I sent them an email this morning stating the following:
I was unable to find one article related to yesterdays audit results presented to the AZ senate. That is viewed as a disservice to the American people. I am reconsidering my subscription due to absence of coverage of such an important subject. What is your reasoning to abstain from releasing any article of any type? Shameful at the least regardless. If I am in error and you have an article to point me to please let me know. Thank you for your time as I reconsider my subscription.
The audit's hearing did not produce anything newsworthy.
Newsworthyness being no conclusion, no conclusivity, no direction, no validation and no legit focus.
What can they report on exactly? That there were discrepancies, but it holds no formalized weight?
Or shall they report about how arrests won't be made because we have to "slow drip" stuff "for the normies"?
You cannot have it both ways. You can't expect media to report something that is nothing whilst at the same time justifying tangible inaction as needed.
You cannot say "It's ok if no arrests or follow ups are made, we have to slow drip it" whilst also moaning about inaction in the media.
The biggest conclusion from the audit is that if you add up all the suspect votes, the total is far and away higher than Biden's margin of victory! A second HUGE conclusion is that if you look at one of the categories of suspect votes, where it is almost certain that those votes shouldn't be counted, it is also almost certain that those votes were for Biden, and when you subtract those, Trump wins.
I do see your point. It's hugely newsworthy... to us, because we get it. But to many people who simply think it's about getting similar vote totals, they truly don't see that thousands of votes should not have been counted, and that is where the election flips. Since there was not some clear cut, spelled out showing of fraud, some reliable outlets didn't want to jump on board. But I believe we do need to slow drip this, however painful that speed is to us, to wake people up. But I appreciate your comment and stance and get your slow drip wanting it both ways.
Yup I got a notification from their app that said the Arizona Audit reaffirmed the 2020 election results that Biden won. I never got a notification that they retracted and apologized but I never checked their app again.
I noted on my calendar to call them Monday to cancel; I will give them until then. If they choose not to cover it by then. I will give my money to a company that supports we the Patriots.
MSG: We will see,but remember that hebrew shall be read from right to left,so what you have after doing it with "times" ? ;)
Also I remember those relations about COW-ID in China.Yes they were reporting that it is fault of the CCP and it is bioengineered virus but also earlier they were one of the sources related to those videos with people falling on the streets in China... I don't really know anons,I don't really know are they white or black hats.
UPDATE: Jennifer Zheng and Falun Gong - they were distributing those news at the beginning. From one side Falun is against CCP,but those cult seems quite nationalist one too (I found something about their doctrine looking like claiming children after mixing of races are "soulless" or something like that.I don't really know it is original doctrine or not...). As I stated - I cannot be sure white hats or black hats.
I think it’s smart to be skeptical. At the same time the Chinese video of people falling on the ground may have came from a Chinese official source. I feel it’s hard even for journalist to distinguish between true and false news. Sometimes they might mess up too. Having said that....they’ve had some weird AP articles on there.
Agree with the point about being skeptical. Really, nothing wrong with that.
That said, when someone uses the world "cult", a little flag goes off in my head, 1) because more often than not, the idea that someone else is a cult is usually based on doctrinal concepts, more than anything else, and 2) because I have done a log of digging on the "cult" thing (as you can see in my post about the "Qanon Cult") and I know that it has been used as a control concept, just as "Conspiracy Theory" has been.
That said, yes, good to be skeptical.
I agree with the sentiment that journalism can also be simply about journalism, without fear or favor. Which means reporting first, and editorializing second. ET reports about the reality of CCP and many other things, without actually spinning it, unlike so many other "media" (bwahahahah) outlets nowadays, which have become essentially propaganda mouths.
There is so much about ET that is good, to my mind, and I'm not exactly in favor of simply ascribing the white hat black hat label to every single entity, group or person under the sun.
This is a BIG DEAL. Top, most frequent comments on all their articles are about why the hell didn’t they cover it. They know. Yet they only updated the “Biden won” article. Nobody from there even listened to it.?!
Good Journalism requires time to investigate and report. There was a lot of information to digest. All the articles released quickly were written before Friday’s presentation.
I'd hold off on that judgement. Let's see what happens this week. There's a lot to digest and the next move has to be figured out.
Cover the audit! It’s very simple. It’s an important story. It matters. Cover it when it happens as it happens.
I cancelled my print sub not too long ago. They were on point there for a while, and one of the last to call the race for biden.
Cover it as they want to cover it. I just wanrt to see a substantial mention of it
https://www.theepochtimes.com/arizona-senate-president-releases-audit-results_4015286.html
It is the biggest news on the planet, if they didn't cover it there is a motive.
Especially since no one else was covering it they could have had the lions share of the market.
I'm tech literate and nothing they said was complicated or hard to understand at all. I wonder if this is what the MSM is saying to keep people from watching it themselves.
Uh, you're not paying attention handshake - he said he was tech LITERATE, not illiterate. Go shill somewhere else.
Yep I noticed that and I sent them an email this morning stating the following:
I was unable to find one article related to yesterdays audit results presented to the AZ senate. That is viewed as a disservice to the American people. I am reconsidering my subscription due to absence of coverage of such an important subject. What is your reasoning to abstain from releasing any article of any type? Shameful at the least regardless. If I am in error and you have an article to point me to please let me know. Thank you for your time as I reconsider my subscription.
I sent a similar email to them... waiting for a reply.
I got a reply from them today with links to their various stories. It basically said they wanted to take time to get their facts straight.
REAL journalism takes additional time to report truthfully and objectively.
This is strange, I will hold my judgement for a little bit.
Wonder what days they publish? I know it isn't every day
I will wait and see, it was late on a Friday - my bet is they have several in depth articles tomorrow.
I guess that OAN is the only one left that I know of. They covered the audit.
I thought they hadn't, so that's good to know. I watched RSBN cover it live.
Wow! The comments section shows that their omission/spin of the audit story is going to cost them MANY, MANY, paid subscribers!
"Arizona Democrats, meanwhile, pounced on the auditors’ report."
Meh
To me, this appears to be an attempt at impugning the reputation of an otherwise worthwhile outlet.
Mike Adams and Natural News covered.
Infowars covered a bit, looks like:
https://www.infowars.com/posts/bombshell-az-audit-team-caught-maricopa-county-deleting-election-files/
Epoch Times failed a big litmus test. This happened months ago with Newsmax as well.
Friday evening was not the best strategic time to drop the audit. Wait and see.
Friday evenings are where news stories go to die.
It just came out. Let journalist's do what they do. Less click bait, more research.
Go to the Epoch story linked here, and you will see why so many people are ending their subscription. They have been compromised.
The audit's hearing did not produce anything newsworthy. Newsworthyness being no conclusion, no conclusivity, no direction, no validation and no legit focus.
What can they report on exactly? That there were discrepancies, but it holds no formalized weight?
Or shall they report about how arrests won't be made because we have to "slow drip" stuff "for the normies"?
You cannot have it both ways. You can't expect media to report something that is nothing whilst at the same time justifying tangible inaction as needed.
You cannot say "It's ok if no arrests or follow ups are made, we have to slow drip it" whilst also moaning about inaction in the media.
You can't have it both ways.
The biggest conclusion from the audit is that if you add up all the suspect votes, the total is far and away higher than Biden's margin of victory! A second HUGE conclusion is that if you look at one of the categories of suspect votes, where it is almost certain that those votes shouldn't be counted, it is also almost certain that those votes were for Biden, and when you subtract those, Trump wins.
I do see your point. It's hugely newsworthy... to us, because we get it. But to many people who simply think it's about getting similar vote totals, they truly don't see that thousands of votes should not have been counted, and that is where the election flips. Since there was not some clear cut, spelled out showing of fraud, some reliable outlets didn't want to jump on board. But I believe we do need to slow drip this, however painful that speed is to us, to wake people up. But I appreciate your comment and stance and get your slow drip wanting it both ways.
A bit presumptive, yes? I received my weekly edition in the mail.yesterday, 9/24. The paper is dated 9/22. You are completely off target here.
It's beyond being "with us" or against us...it's about the truth. How in the heck did they think this wasn't a story?!?
I think it indicates they have received threats. Aren't their headquarters in Taiwan?
I thought they did cover it, and said that Joe Biden won. Then they retracted that, and apologized. I read that somewhere on here or PDW
Yup I got a notification from their app that said the Arizona Audit reaffirmed the 2020 election results that Biden won. I never got a notification that they retracted and apologized but I never checked their app again.
Same with the Blaze.
You really jumped the gun on this post huh?
Maybe OP works for CNN or some other fake news agency quick to report fake news with no due diligence
I saw the same headline from them about the recount, and no coverage of the actual audit.
Thought they were different. I was wrong.
Had recently signed up for online trial. Cancelled
I noted on my calendar to call them Monday to cancel; I will give them until then. If they choose not to cover it by then. I will give my money to a company that supports we the Patriots.
We cancelled our subscription also.
Epoch Times has ways been quiet on weekends...
Wow. So sad to see so many turn on one of the best, most balanced REAL journalism organizations out there.
From what I can see, they published an article on the 24th, and then updated it on the 26th.
I guess people just love to bitch about something. I really don't think mob mentality is the way. So quick to judge.....
I am surprised. They always seemed based.
For: u/AtomicBlonde , u/Supremeclientele31 u/WeAreNotForgotten u/WeAreNotForgotten u/FractalizingIron u/KickingPugilist u/MAGAftwftp u/Rubieroo u/Cpleb u/Mister_Winston u/Mister_Winston u/WeAreNotForgotten u/JizmJunky u/Anandamide u/bubble_bursts u/Rubieroo u/quila62 u/pnwhomebrewer u/SpaceForceTribunals u/PhDinNY u/DotA-Life3 u/GoGoOptomistic u/FractalizingIron u/KickingPugilist & others...
MSG: We will see,but remember that hebrew shall be read from right to left,so what you have after doing it with "times" ? ;)
Also I remember those relations about COW-ID in China.Yes they were reporting that it is fault of the CCP and it is bioengineered virus but also earlier they were one of the sources related to those videos with people falling on the streets in China... I don't really know anons,I don't really know are they white or black hats.
UPDATE: Jennifer Zheng and Falun Gong - they were distributing those news at the beginning. From one side Falun is against CCP,but those cult seems quite nationalist one too (I found something about their doctrine looking like claiming children after mixing of races are "soulless" or something like that.I don't really know it is original doctrine or not...). As I stated - I cannot be sure white hats or black hats.
I think it’s smart to be skeptical. At the same time the Chinese video of people falling on the ground may have came from a Chinese official source. I feel it’s hard even for journalist to distinguish between true and false news. Sometimes they might mess up too. Having said that....they’ve had some weird AP articles on there.
Agree with the point about being skeptical. Really, nothing wrong with that.
That said, when someone uses the world "cult", a little flag goes off in my head, 1) because more often than not, the idea that someone else is a cult is usually based on doctrinal concepts, more than anything else, and 2) because I have done a log of digging on the "cult" thing (as you can see in my post about the "Qanon Cult") and I know that it has been used as a control concept, just as "Conspiracy Theory" has been.
That said, yes, good to be skeptical.
I agree with the sentiment that journalism can also be simply about journalism, without fear or favor. Which means reporting first, and editorializing second. ET reports about the reality of CCP and many other things, without actually spinning it, unlike so many other "media" (bwahahahah) outlets nowadays, which have become essentially propaganda mouths.
There is so much about ET that is good, to my mind, and I'm not exactly in favor of simply ascribing the white hat black hat label to every single entity, group or person under the sun.
Overall, enjoyed the comment, @cee8hooz
Thanks for reaching out! Gonna dig
no excuse for not instantly coming out with a story. massive news. fuck these faggots
I agree.
The Friday excuse doesn't fly.
This is a BIG DEAL. Top, most frequent comments on all their articles are about why the hell didn’t they cover it. They know. Yet they only updated the “Biden won” article. Nobody from there even listened to it.?!
The Epoc Times did cover the audit. Quit shilling for the enemy.
Good Journalism requires time to investigate and report. There was a lot of information to digest. All the articles released quickly were written before Friday’s presentation.
Just google this:
Look at the title in google.
They've renamed the article after a day but google still has the old version of the title.
Yea, they’ve turned into PAYtriots.
Love that term "Pay-triots
No smoking gun? What news are you watching?
Neo nazi cum rags don't benefit from a united front.
they believe in a false religion though
They're an anti-china organization. There is no money to be made of China is beat back into submission.
I want a huge f-ing apology by Monday or I’m done.
From OP?