I'm fairly sure that Jesus could shoot beams of the power cosmic out of His eyes or fight Thanos with the Infinity Gauntlet if He wanted to but He's just kinda TBN and chill, except for that turning water into wine trick. Definitely showing off.
The Jewish Messiah is a judge who convinces people to stop going to war.
And he will judge between the nations, and he will convince many multitudes; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. - Isaiah 2:4
No mention of a Messiah with super powers anywhere in the Old Testament.
Your welcome
Being considered trash before a nazi is very much an honor
We are American Patriots
Consider joining us
Or continuing hating
Your choice, but not BOTH
Nice to see that your vocabulary includes words that do not actually exist. Do you speak English, or is that a "Jewish language"? How many times have you watched the "Hills Have Eyes" series? Did you memorize lines? Could you relate to the characters as real people? Did the cast seem like a family reunion?
Just curious.
How would you know if I'm a white Christian or not? Maybe I'm neither and I just think you're an idiot?
My dude, please go back to your echo chamber and keep licking the boots of your government overlords.
Being compared to a nazi is not an insult to me because I know I'm not one and so it doesn't faze me. YOU on the other hand, oh boy, you HATE being compared to anything you dislike so how about this: YOU are the nazi fascist white supremacist. There. I'd love to see you rRrEEeeeEeeE at this.
"anti-semite" is a weaponized word invented to shield bad people from criticism
"racist" and "sexist" are also weaponized words. "conspiracy theorist" as well.
one should disregard anyone who uses these types of weaponized words.
language is far more important than you may think. we need to start utilizing language in more effective ways. never say "covid" or "pandemic", it gives those concepts legitimacy.
They were not Jews. They were thrown out for their violent ways..they are Kazarians..they were forced to adopt a religion and they chose to be Jews and join them.
They even go on to say in the article that believing in Jesus and that the Jewish peoples crucified him is not just antisemitic but also satanic hahaha!
Show me the text that says that ..isn't that the synagogue of satan you refer to..not Jews? Don't forget the man you are professing to worship Jesus was born and died a Jew. He did not come to start a religion ..
it's people like you that the word racist was meant for.
Show me where it says he wasn't. He was born and died a Jew. According to a messed up bible. He was arguing against how Jews and rabbis had not been following jewish law not setting up a new religion... Constantine a satanic ruler did that and changed one name for their pagan God MIthras ..left everything else the same..MIthras died for our sins rose again.blah blah. Lah..same holy days were left..all the books in the Bible discussing reincarnation were removed at council of Nicea. Look it up do some research people..you are being used,. When you know you return then priests have no hold over you..if they order you to kill someone you know you will receive karma in your next life to learn that do no harm is a universal law.
The devil has done a good job infiltrating the major religious establishments, and many others he doesn't even need to get involved. Many mega churches are no church at all (think Joel Osteen), the Vatican, need I say more, Jerusalem. Many evil deeds have happened by many events, the devil has done his best work there/ those types of places. So many "Christians" believe in a Health/Wealth belief structure, SAD. "God wants you to be happy, God wants you to be rich, God wants you to be smart." What sauce do the preachers provide who proclaim this? Look at me, what God has done for this church, he wants you to have this same thing for yourself. I don't actually listen to foolish preaching like his, so I don't actually know what he preaches will give you these things, or what sauce they claim to bring to the table. But I've met many people in very reformed circles poisoned by this very same type of belief. For those who need to hear this truth. God wants you to share in an eternal reward in heaven, as joint heirs with Christ, he does NOT promise you wealth on earth, nor is wealth a status in God's eyes. For it is harder for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven than a camel to enter the eye of a needle. To the rich young man who kept all of these commandments since his youth. Go therefore, and sell all of your possessions, give to the poor, and follow me. The man went away sad, for he had many possessions. God wants you to be cleansed from all sin, and never have diseases, when you arrive in heaven, but consider my servant Job, Satan then inflicts him with serious disease, so that everyone around him tells him to curse God, yet he does not. God wants you to be smart/wise. God calls us to be wise, he does not promise college education, good grades in school, or even favor from our employers. In fact, should you suffer for the name of Christ, and not because you are a bad worker, your reward will be all the greater in heaven. There are so many lies spread in every religion to cause us to stumble, and rest assured, God's promises / threats to people who provide stumbling blocks... just know, that they have gotten [or will get] theirs [in due time]. No sin will go unpunished (very frightful if you truly consider the meaning). Let us then be workers of light and not of darkness.
The meaning of a rich man is a man rich in personality...ego...the kingdom of heaven is within you supposedly said the prince of peace...wasted on people who judge condemn others without examining the mote in their own eyes but say they are followers of a Jew they know never stopped being a Jew.
"The word βChrist,β which to modern readers seems like a family name, just means βanointed oneβ and is the Greek version of the Hebrew word βMashiahβ or βanointed.β
The word 'Christ' is not based on the neo-Hebrew 'Mashiah'. Let the truth be told about the modern written Hebrew of today. The modern Hebrew (neo-Hebrew) word 'Mashiah' was actually translated from the Greek 'chrΔ«stos' in 900 AD. So, it is the opposite of what is being claimed here. The original Hebrew (paleo-Hebrew) was already lost to antiquity for over a thousand years.
Look up "Hebrew" and even Wikipedia tells us that the written Hebrew of modern times (neo-Hebrew) is not paleo-Hebrew. Paleo-Hebrew is the original writings of the books of the Old Testament (OT). As I said, paleo-Hebrew was lost to antiquity.
Modern written Hebrew is based on the work by the Masoretes in 900 AD. Who are the Masoretes? They are Pharisaic Jews (Pharisees), who recreated a new written 'Hebrew' from Arabic and other existing Canaanitish languages because the original Hebrew was lost in antiquity. The Masoretes used the Greek Septuagint Old Testament to create a new written 'Hebrew' that had vowel points.
The oldest Bible OT there is the Septuagint, which was transliterated from the original paleo-Hebrew in circa 285 BC. The original Hebrew written language was by that time becoming extinct.
According to tradition, it was Ptolemy Philadelphus, who purchased the freedom of Israelites in his territories, arranged for 6 scholars from each of the 12 tribes to translate the first 5 books of the Old Testament from paleo-Hebrew into Greek around 285 BC. By this time a practical knowledge of the Hebrew written language was all but lost.
The original written Hebrew consisted only of consonants and relied on an oral knowledge to decipher the consonant only words. Think of the 'cat' and remove the vowel. It becomes 'ct'. Without the vowel, the word 'ct' could be cat, cot, cut, cute, acute, coat, etc. An individual of knowledge would be required to orally teach others what the word 'ct' was. This is how the priestly class taught and passed on the writings of the bible. The paleo-Hebrew writings were designed for the bible deciphering. This is how the Hebrew written language was passed down generation after generation. It was central to understanding the bible.
With the written Hebrew language being greatly eclipsed and dominated by the very popular Greek language, which was the international language of the day, Hebrew was in danger of being lost. Ptolemy gathered together 72 scholars and in a short period of time they completed the Pentateuch. The Pentateuch is from Greek pentΓ‘teuchos and is the first five books of the Old Testament. The Latin name 'Septuagint' means 70, and was later applied to the translation in circa 1555 AD, for there was approximately 70 translators. This is also the reason why the abbreviation 'LXX' is used for this reason. After the first 5 books were finished, the translators set out to work on the rest of the OT. The exact date this was accomplished is not known, but it is certain the complete OT was finished within 100 years and it is likely it was completed within a few years by the same translators.
Did you know that all Protestant bibles are based on the Pharisaic Masoretic Text that was given to the Catholic Church in 900 AD? Does anyone know why the Masoretes re-engineered the OT in a made-up written language? Could it be that in their own writings they believed the bible shouldn't be understood by the public and should remain strictly in the confines of understanding to the rabbis? In other words, they were attempting to undue what Ptolemy did in 285 BC.
In regards, to the bible, if you want to discern the truth, it is best to use old versions of the protestant bible (1636 KJV, Geneva Bible) the Catholic pre-1964 Jerusalem bible, LXX, and a good English-Greek Lexicon (Strong's, Thayers, and especially Liddell-Scott-Jones) to verify and understand the translations. Relying on only the English fails to adequately 'paint' the complete picture of meaning as does the Greek.
Are you bleeping high?! That is a broad brush, like many broad brushes, not a true statement. Have you looked into different translations fren? The dead sea scrolls (either the oldest, or nearly the oldest document) confirm the best translations. ESV is a word for word translation with grammatical changes made to fit English because English, as a language, blows chunks. Both ESV and NIV, not to mention other translations like HCSB have all derived from the oldest transcripts, being translated by Christians of different denominations, all agreeing on the different definitions of words. These denominations are not picked at random, they are ones that hold firmly to the conception that the word of God is holy and perfect, that man inspired by God wrote what he desired. The Geneva Bible is a fine Bible, I have no known issues with it. It is however a couple hundred years old, so if you wanna bust out a thesaurus to read it, that's your choice. If you think that people 500 years ago were un-corruptable, but we are ultra-corruptable, then I believe you've dug yourself in too deep mentally into realities that don't exist. There is a danger of saying everyone and everything that disagrees with me is wrong, and is Deep State meant to confuse us. Some people are genuinely mistaken, they do things to the best of their abilities to the best of their knowledge, but it is fraught with sin, and has the likelihood to be errant. When it comes to translations, you have to look at those who translated it, what were their intentions in the translation, and how does it pan out? What effective changes did they make? Reading the NIV, which is a phrase for phrase translation, compared to the ESV, which is more word for word, you notice the phrasing is different between the two. When you look at the effectual change, there really isn't any. A Christian who studied one over the other is not any better or worse off. Does this mean the two translations are equal? No, I think the concept of the ESV (much like a modern Geneva Bible) is a cleaner translation, because of its particular focus on things like word for word being more important than phrase for phrase based on who the translators are, it gives them [the translators] more authority to change things, even if barely slightly. I'd prefer the translators have as little responsibility as possible, much like the government should have the smallest responsibility as possible. To say that all protestant bibles etc. Do you realize how many people are under the umbrella of Protestant. Any non-Catholic Christian is considered a protestant, whether they claim the title or not. So I think you do wrong by your claim, in the future, please be more specific about who you say is blasphemous, or strike with a more appropriate strike. What you basically said is, all churches that are not catholic, are evil / retarded. This is not true, and I think most Catholics wouldn't agree with many directions taken by the catholic church, which many things in the catholic church is derived from the Vatican II flavor of Bible, which is now considered one of the worst translations (ditched by the catholic church for a while I'm pretty sure [I'm not catholic, so I don't really follow modern Catholicism]).
"Have you looked into different translations fren?"
Oh yea, I've been doing this for over 40 years.
" The dead sea scrolls (either the oldest, or nearly the oldest document) confirm the best translations."
Qumran scrolls are about the same age as the Septuagint (285 BC) and date from 300 BC to 100 AD. What's interesting is that the Qumran scrolls agree with the accuracy of the Septuagint more so than the Masoretic Texts.
"These denominations are not picked at random, they are ones that hold firmly to the conception that the word of God is holy and perfect, that man inspired by God wrote what he desired."
The inspiration that God provides is observable throughout Nature. It is foremost in daily life. The Bible is only witness to this. Yet, it is all too commonly ignored. Biblical inerrancy is the belief that Scripture is completely without error. This has has become a central belief of evangelicalism. Let's get this straight. The Bible is not the Son of God. It is a human book. As a human book, it is vulnerable to the errors of human and historical limitations. I could provide ample evidence of this, but these detailed examples are for another time. In addition, the many books of the Bible and not included in the Bible is a testament of human short comings and historical limitations. The Bible is not a divine oracle sent down from heaven either. It does however bears witness to the Word of God, and it is therefore an indirect form of the Word by the Holy Spirit [emphasis added]. In other words, the Bible points beyond itself to the Word of God; it does not contain within itself the Word. The Word of God is not bound to a book, nor should it be, yet this human book becomes Godβs Word in its witness [emphasis added]. We depend on the faithfulness of the Holy Spirit to lead us into all truth, not on the βperfectionβ of a book. The key word here is 'Holy Spirit' or from the Greek 'pneuma', who's Divine Order is observable throughout Nature and it's Laws.
"The Geneva Bible is a fine Bible, I have no known issues with it."
I have this 1599 version. Generally speaking protestant bibles are based on the corrupted Masoretic Texts.
"If you think that people 500 years ago were un-corruptable, but we are ultra-corruptable, then I believe you've dug yourself in too deep mentally into realities that don't exist."
You stated this, I didn't. I did say protestant Bibles are based on the Masoretic Texts and should be cross referenced with other Bibles including a good English-Greek Lexicon. I even check the Latin, as well.
" When it comes to translations, you have to look at those who translated it, what were their intentions in the translation, and how does it pan out? What effective changes did they make?"
I agree. You are making my point.
"Reading the NIV, which is a phrase for phrase translation, compared to the ESV, which is more word for word, you notice the phrasing is different between the two. When you look at the effectual change, there really isn't any."
True, but there's more. And you stated it yourself -- ..."because English, as a language, blows chunks." This is why a good English-Greek Lexicon adds additional light on word definitions. Again, I could provide examples that would take up pages.
"To say that all protestant bibles etc. Do you realize how many people are under the umbrella of Protestant. Any non-Catholic Christian is considered a protestant, whether they claim the title or not."
This does not eliminate the very Bible's categorized under these main branches of Christianity. Normally, the Pope isn't reading from the KJV. Or is a Baptist minister reading from the Catholic Jerusalem Bible. Nor is the Greek or Russian Orthodox reading anything other than the LXX.
"...many things in the catholic church is derived from the Vatican II flavor of Bible, which is now considered one of the worst translations..."
You stated this. I didn't. I spoke of the Catholic pre-1964 Jerusalem bible. This is Vatican I era. Again, there are important insights the Old Jerusalem Bible can provide. For example in the old Jerusalem bible, Isaiah 34:14 mentions "....there too will Lilith take cover seeking rest." The NKJV states -- "Also the night creature shall rest there, and find for herself a place of rest. The KJV states -- " the screech owl also shall rest there, and find for herself a place of rest." And the HCSB says the following -- "Indeed, the night birds will stay there and will find a resting place.
If anyone knows who 'Lilith' is and the widespread belief of the deity during Isaiah's time, they would certainly have a much better understanding of this verse than the English translation of "night birds". One has to question why the name of Lilith was taken out. The question is did the translators not want the people to know? In the Jewish Kabbalah a part of the Pharisaic Talmud, Lilith is the first wife of Adam, and was banished from Eden. She became a demon and her special delight was to murder young children. The Canaanites use to sacrifice their first born and bury it in the wall of their home to pay homage to Lilith.
This is great. I think we are paying for the fact that the general populous has forgotten our past, and I don't mean what happened 50 years ago. One thing can be said for cultures who pass down their knowledge verbally is that it seems that they include the entire history.
This is the kind of history that people need to know and understand in order to recognize what is happening in the current space. Before I was awakened, I looked at history as "something that happened back then". Not as something that has been building over the course of time and forming the current space.
Never more has the term "forget your history, you are doomed to repeat it" meant so much.
Have you read the translation of the bible by an Italian..name escapes me..written for pope who did not want such truth out there? I keep meaning to read it..will put an end to all religions
Tried googling it. NADA. Clif high has also spoken of him. I know proper translation vofvholy spirit is not at all what people think...lotscof stuff about aliens in the Bible.
God is a Spirit that now dwells in the body of Jesus Christ. But Hebrew means βone who has crossed over from death to lifeβ but Hebrew is a thought process first before itβs a language. Paul spoke with a Hebrew tongue many who spoke different languages understood him! Think about that for a minute!
Jehova was a spirit that now dwells in the immortal body of Jesus.
God is more than this, as God is the Father (the God to whom Jesus prayed), the Son (Jesus/Jehova), and also the Holy Ghost. God ("Elohim") is a plural word. Ponder on Genesis 1:26 for a bit!
Hebrew is the language Eber spoke. Tell me what language was that? Also, I am talking strictly of the written language, not the many Canaanite spoken languages.
Look up "Hebrew" and even Wikipedia tells us that the written Hebrew of modern times (neo-Hebrew) is not paleo-Hebrew. Paleo-Hebrew is the original writings of the books of the Old Testament (OT). As I said, paleo-Hebrew was lost to antiquity.
Hebrew letters have gone through several revisions. It's true the original letter versions of most of the books of the OT fell out of use. However we still have plenty of writings of such letters, and know how to read them.
Modern written Hebrew is based on the work by the Masoretes in 900 AD. Who are the Masoretes? They are Pharisaic Jews (Pharisees), who recreated a new written 'Hebrew' from Arabic and other existing Canaanitish languages because the original Hebrew was lost in antiquity. The Masoretes used the Greek Septuagint Old Testament to create a new written 'Hebrew' that had vowel points.
Ever heard of the Judean Desert Scrolls which predate the Masoretes by a thousand years? Those scrolls are still readable today. In fact they closely match what the Masoretes produced. Most of them use the more modern Hebrew letters, some of them use the older Hebrew. Some use both. An Aleph is still an Aleph whether the character for it is drawn like an X or drawn like an Ox's head.
All the Masoretes did was come up with a canonical text by deciding between variant spellings and synonymous wording, standardized chapters, and added vowels around the text and punctuation marks. From the text itself, the differences between that and texts a millennia earlier are minute.
The Masoretes were not Pharisaic Jews, they were Karaite Jews.
The oldest Bible OT there is the Septuagint, which was transliterated from the original paleo-Hebrew in circa 285 BC.
The original Septuagint was only on the first 5 books of the OT, and has been long lost, as it was replaced by many later updated Greek translations. The Judean Desert Scrolls though are from the time frame you mention, and are in old Hebrew lettering, new Hebrew lettering, and Greek.
After the first 5 books were finished, the translators set out to work on the rest of the OT. The exact date this was accomplished is not known, but it is certain the complete OT was finished within 100 years and it is likely it was completed within a few years by the same translators.
Nice wishful thinking.
We can say that many of the Greek in our hands today used translation techniques from those first translations. But no authoritative original Greek version exists.
If there was an original authoritative Greek version extant on everything, there would have been no reason for Aquila or various Church Fathers to do their own translations (or translation updates).
fact, most women should not wear yoga pants in public. the only advantage to a mask (which I don't wear) would be a good catch for when I throw up in my mouth and a little bit escapes.
There are many religions, and I don't think you are far off the mark. There is absolutely ONE truth. Our aim as mankind should be to find that ONE truth. That is why faith is so important. If God descended on mankind once every 10 years and said, X religion is correct, everyone believe X, then we like sheep could all believe X, there wouldn't be faith, there would be blind obedience. Instead, God gave man enough evidence to believe in him, and the deeper you dig, the more "anomalies" in the pagan beliefs, and more align with the Bible. Many who have set out to disprove the Bible, often become Christians themselves, and very fervent for it too. There is enough out there that you could come to a completely different conclusion as well. There's enough confusing things out there, that it's hard to know what is true and not true, and this doesn't even factor in the fake news media outlets confusing the confusion even more. So then, each man believes in something, the atheist, agnostic, the sheep, the devout, the thinker. They all have a belief, and most put themselves as God, with believing we know better than God. That's not to say we shouldn't question our churches, our Bible translations, or even ask God, "WHY!?" because these things in and of themselves aren't wrong, but many are led down pathways of evil because of it. They say, all churches are evil, or all translations except X are wrong and heretical, or I'm right, and everyone else, even God is wrong, I'm the master of my own life, you can easily become like the woman from Proverbs who says, "I am, and besides me, there is no other." Most sins we commit, we actually place ourselves above God, as you break down the sins. Take theft for example. You may steal something from a rich man, he won't notice, and you think he doesn't deserve it, and you've done so much good in your life, it shouldn't matter. So you steal. People said, ok, God says don't steal, and you stole, book closed, say X Hail Mary's and go about your business, not a big deal. I disagree, you steal, but what was the bigger sin, what God has given you isn't enough, you tell God that his gifts are insufficient for your needs, and you need to go around his back to get what you deserve. The sin is predominantly a sin against God, not against man, as the rich man could easily replace what you stole if he even noticed it was gone in the first place. This is the depths of sin that people even in the best of churches out there are still lacking. I ask, why do our fellow believers not know this, this OUGHT to be basic. in closing i've ranted too much. I don't think that is true of all religions, very broad brush, but i think you have validity to your claim.
So once again we're letting unbelievers tell us about our own faith and pretend to know the scripture more than people who have been studying it for literally decades and have devoted their whole lives to God and to a proper understanding of His word.
First of all, the Talmud is a massive, encyclopedic collection of rabbinic teachings and commentaries on the law, not to be confused with the actual Bible itself.
Second, the Koran was written by a pedophilic warlord who designed a unique new religion in order to gain power for himself and has resulted in the bloodiest and most violent movement to ever survive the modern era until Marxism came upon the scene to eclipse Islam as the most genocidal ideology on the planet. It has nothing to do with the Bible other than the fact that it tried to co-opt Jewish and Christian theological concepts and bend them to its own ends.
Third, I'm not sure what the name of God in the ancient Hebrew has to do with any of this discussion.
Fourth, the "bath salts" comment was purely ad-hominem attack and beneath the level of discussion one should demand in any context.
Don't want to debate...it's not allowed on this platform. If you are interested you will find answers for yourself. Start with. the pagan religion before Jesus. Look at astrotheology and Clif high has very good research contacts. This is what Q wanted. Research..don't blindly accept what you are told by vested interests. It's.not just big pharma that do it.
Soon every knee (even the jewish knees) will kneel and every tongue (even the jewish tongues) will confess aloud that Jesus Christ is indeed God Amighty! Oh the joy for those of us who already do! π
too bad, jews everywhere have been waking up to Jesus as The Messiah since the rock was moved and the tomb was revealed to be empty
I have a Jewish aquaintance that once lumped Jesus in with Superhero's like Batman and Superman...
I added:
He proceeded to lose his shit. lol
you subversive teacher, you. talk about superpowers
humpty dumpy sat on a wall,
humpty dumpty had a great fall.
all the kings horses, and all the kings men,
couldn't put humpty dumpty back together again
wow! that's visceral, isn't it?!
Kvetching to 11.
I'm fairly sure that Jesus could shoot beams of the power cosmic out of His eyes or fight Thanos with the Infinity Gauntlet if He wanted to but He's just kinda TBN and chill, except for that turning water into wine trick. Definitely showing off.
He is exactly what they wished the messiah were.
The Jewish Messiah is a judge who convinces people to stop going to war.
And he will judge between the nations, and he will convince many multitudes; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. - Isaiah 2:4
No mention of a Messiah with super powers anywhere in the Old Testament.
Yes the art is creepy.
What is DIA in this context?
Especially now that he is out of the closet π
Well, Jesus was βKing of the Jews.β
Thatβs how he got crucified deep state told romans he declared himself king of the jews, soon after the money changers incident
And the ones who killed him inscribed that on the cross as the most disgusting "shitpost" of all time.
Amen! They are really grasping for straws now.
Why is this stickied?? Because, get fuct, 666.
F*%k (((them)))
π
Haha.
Yeah get rekt
I heard they had an aversion to Pineapple because is becomes King Of The Juice.
ππΈ
V
V
V
π€
π³π
AAAAA AAA A.... Choo
Just don't repeat it and make whistling noises at the same time. Can't end well...
Humble up dude.
Didn't they try this same tactic back when Jesus was around too? 2,000 years later and they STILL haven't learned.
Who are they? This was written by a prominent Christian. Attach Christians moron, not Jews
This sounds like pointy nose speak.
Your opinion is noted and thrown in the trash, thanks.
Your welcome Being considered trash before a nazi is very much an honor We are American Patriots Consider joining us Or continuing hating Your choice, but not BOTH
I'm a nazi because your opinion is trash? Okay my bro, back to the reddit echo chamber you go, the orange man can't hurt you there.
It's ok schlomo
Nice to see that your vocabulary includes words that do not actually exist. Do you speak English, or is that a "Jewish language"? How many times have you watched the "Hills Have Eyes" series? Did you memorize lines? Could you relate to the characters as real people? Did the cast seem like a family reunion? Just curious.
How would you know if I'm a white Christian or not? Maybe I'm neither and I just think you're an idiot?
My dude, please go back to your echo chamber and keep licking the boots of your government overlords.
Being compared to a nazi is not an insult to me because I know I'm not one and so it doesn't faze me. YOU on the other hand, oh boy, you HATE being compared to anything you dislike so how about this: YOU are the nazi fascist white supremacist. There. I'd love to see you rRrEEeeeEeeE at this.
I take that as a compliment Brother. Happy New Year!
"anti-semite" is a weaponized word invented to shield bad people from criticism
"racist" and "sexist" are also weaponized words. "conspiracy theorist" as well.
one should disregard anyone who uses these types of weaponized words.
language is far more important than you may think. we need to start utilizing language in more effective ways. never say "covid" or "pandemic", it gives those concepts legitimacy.
You are correct.
Also don't say 'immigrant' when referring to aliens. These folks rejected the immigration paradigm because they wanted to cut in line.
I challenge people all the time about the language they accept and parrot. They hate the resulting dissonance and consequently hate me. kek
That is a racist remark. I have Jewish friends that don't give a toss about money.
When you talk about know them by their fruit put yourself in there too.
Jesus was born and died a Jew .. according to your what you profess to believe
Your life. Not the Jewish people. How many do you know? Four?
And the author of that books knows god.thinks this...god told him did he? Please !!.
They were not Jews. They were thrown out for their violent ways..they are Kazarians..they were forced to adopt a religion and they chose to be Jews and join them.
Israelite. Big difference.
I see that all the time.
People say "George Soros is an evil businessman".
Shills, "You hate jews".
People say, "Obama was a traitor."
Shills, "You hate blacks."
People, "Hillary is evil."
Shills, "You hate women."
Me, "She's a woman?"
Those 3 are zionists. Maybe you just don't like zionism.
I. Don't. Care.
This is old news. Like, 2000 years old news. They didn't like Jesus then, they sure as hell don't like him now.
top kek
Oy vey. This pejorative is getting old.
They even go on to say in the article that believing in Jesus and that the Jewish peoples crucified him is not just antisemitic but also satanic hahaha!
I should do some research if I was you
What are you saying? And about what? Are you saying he wasnt?
"He's not the Messiah. He's a very naughty boy."
never gets old
Jews will never wake up to Jesus. As taught in the bible their father is the devil. A goat cannot become a sheep.
Sadly for their eternal souls, you are absolutely right. Some convert, I hope more do.
Show me the text that says that ..isn't that the synagogue of satan you refer to..not Jews? Don't forget the man you are professing to worship Jesus was born and died a Jew. He did not come to start a religion ..
it's people like you that the word racist was meant for.
Jesus was not a Jew. I don't mind being called a racist.
Denying obvious truth is a feature of a fixed mind..you can see that in people who deny the damage the vaxx is doing.
Show me where it says he wasn't. He was born and died a Jew. According to a messed up bible. He was arguing against how Jews and rabbis had not been following jewish law not setting up a new religion... Constantine a satanic ruler did that and changed one name for their pagan God MIthras ..left everything else the same..MIthras died for our sins rose again.blah blah. Lah..same holy days were left..all the books in the Bible discussing reincarnation were removed at council of Nicea. Look it up do some research people..you are being used,. When you know you return then priests have no hold over you..if they order you to kill someone you know you will receive karma in your next life to learn that do no harm is a universal law.
You are very welcomed
Not going to debate.
The devil has done a good job infiltrating the major religious establishments, and many others he doesn't even need to get involved. Many mega churches are no church at all (think Joel Osteen), the Vatican, need I say more, Jerusalem. Many evil deeds have happened by many events, the devil has done his best work there/ those types of places. So many "Christians" believe in a Health/Wealth belief structure, SAD. "God wants you to be happy, God wants you to be rich, God wants you to be smart." What sauce do the preachers provide who proclaim this? Look at me, what God has done for this church, he wants you to have this same thing for yourself. I don't actually listen to foolish preaching like his, so I don't actually know what he preaches will give you these things, or what sauce they claim to bring to the table. But I've met many people in very reformed circles poisoned by this very same type of belief. For those who need to hear this truth. God wants you to share in an eternal reward in heaven, as joint heirs with Christ, he does NOT promise you wealth on earth, nor is wealth a status in God's eyes. For it is harder for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven than a camel to enter the eye of a needle. To the rich young man who kept all of these commandments since his youth. Go therefore, and sell all of your possessions, give to the poor, and follow me. The man went away sad, for he had many possessions. God wants you to be cleansed from all sin, and never have diseases, when you arrive in heaven, but consider my servant Job, Satan then inflicts him with serious disease, so that everyone around him tells him to curse God, yet he does not. God wants you to be smart/wise. God calls us to be wise, he does not promise college education, good grades in school, or even favor from our employers. In fact, should you suffer for the name of Christ, and not because you are a bad worker, your reward will be all the greater in heaven. There are so many lies spread in every religion to cause us to stumble, and rest assured, God's promises / threats to people who provide stumbling blocks... just know, that they have gotten [or will get] theirs [in due time]. No sin will go unpunished (very frightful if you truly consider the meaning). Let us then be workers of light and not of darkness.
All I have to say to this.....is Amen.
The meaning of a rich man is a man rich in personality...ego...the kingdom of heaven is within you supposedly said the prince of peace...wasted on people who judge condemn others without examining the mote in their own eyes but say they are followers of a Jew they know never stopped being a Jew.
The word 'Christ' is not based on the neo-Hebrew 'Mashiah'. Let the truth be told about the modern written Hebrew of today. The modern Hebrew (neo-Hebrew) word 'Mashiah' was actually translated from the Greek 'chrΔ«stos' in 900 AD. So, it is the opposite of what is being claimed here. The original Hebrew (paleo-Hebrew) was already lost to antiquity for over a thousand years.
Look up "Hebrew" and even Wikipedia tells us that the written Hebrew of modern times (neo-Hebrew) is not paleo-Hebrew. Paleo-Hebrew is the original writings of the books of the Old Testament (OT). As I said, paleo-Hebrew was lost to antiquity.
Modern written Hebrew is based on the work by the Masoretes in 900 AD. Who are the Masoretes? They are Pharisaic Jews (Pharisees), who recreated a new written 'Hebrew' from Arabic and other existing Canaanitish languages because the original Hebrew was lost in antiquity. The Masoretes used the Greek Septuagint Old Testament to create a new written 'Hebrew' that had vowel points.
The oldest Bible OT there is the Septuagint, which was transliterated from the original paleo-Hebrew in circa 285 BC. The original Hebrew written language was by that time becoming extinct.
According to tradition, it was Ptolemy Philadelphus, who purchased the freedom of Israelites in his territories, arranged for 6 scholars from each of the 12 tribes to translate the first 5 books of the Old Testament from paleo-Hebrew into Greek around 285 BC. By this time a practical knowledge of the Hebrew written language was all but lost.
The original written Hebrew consisted only of consonants and relied on an oral knowledge to decipher the consonant only words. Think of the 'cat' and remove the vowel. It becomes 'ct'. Without the vowel, the word 'ct' could be cat, cot, cut, cute, acute, coat, etc. An individual of knowledge would be required to orally teach others what the word 'ct' was. This is how the priestly class taught and passed on the writings of the bible. The paleo-Hebrew writings were designed for the bible deciphering. This is how the Hebrew written language was passed down generation after generation. It was central to understanding the bible.
With the written Hebrew language being greatly eclipsed and dominated by the very popular Greek language, which was the international language of the day, Hebrew was in danger of being lost. Ptolemy gathered together 72 scholars and in a short period of time they completed the Pentateuch. The Pentateuch is from Greek pentΓ‘teuchos and is the first five books of the Old Testament. The Latin name 'Septuagint' means 70, and was later applied to the translation in circa 1555 AD, for there was approximately 70 translators. This is also the reason why the abbreviation 'LXX' is used for this reason. After the first 5 books were finished, the translators set out to work on the rest of the OT. The exact date this was accomplished is not known, but it is certain the complete OT was finished within 100 years and it is likely it was completed within a few years by the same translators.
Did you know that all Protestant bibles are based on the Pharisaic Masoretic Text that was given to the Catholic Church in 900 AD? Does anyone know why the Masoretes re-engineered the OT in a made-up written language? Could it be that in their own writings they believed the bible shouldn't be understood by the public and should remain strictly in the confines of understanding to the rabbis? In other words, they were attempting to undue what Ptolemy did in 285 BC.
In regards, to the bible, if you want to discern the truth, it is best to use old versions of the protestant bible (1636 KJV, Geneva Bible) the Catholic pre-1964 Jerusalem bible, LXX, and a good English-Greek Lexicon (Strong's, Thayers, and especially Liddell-Scott-Jones) to verify and understand the translations. Relying on only the English fails to adequately 'paint' the complete picture of meaning as does the Greek.
Are you bleeping high?! That is a broad brush, like many broad brushes, not a true statement. Have you looked into different translations fren? The dead sea scrolls (either the oldest, or nearly the oldest document) confirm the best translations. ESV is a word for word translation with grammatical changes made to fit English because English, as a language, blows chunks. Both ESV and NIV, not to mention other translations like HCSB have all derived from the oldest transcripts, being translated by Christians of different denominations, all agreeing on the different definitions of words. These denominations are not picked at random, they are ones that hold firmly to the conception that the word of God is holy and perfect, that man inspired by God wrote what he desired. The Geneva Bible is a fine Bible, I have no known issues with it. It is however a couple hundred years old, so if you wanna bust out a thesaurus to read it, that's your choice. If you think that people 500 years ago were un-corruptable, but we are ultra-corruptable, then I believe you've dug yourself in too deep mentally into realities that don't exist. There is a danger of saying everyone and everything that disagrees with me is wrong, and is Deep State meant to confuse us. Some people are genuinely mistaken, they do things to the best of their abilities to the best of their knowledge, but it is fraught with sin, and has the likelihood to be errant. When it comes to translations, you have to look at those who translated it, what were their intentions in the translation, and how does it pan out? What effective changes did they make? Reading the NIV, which is a phrase for phrase translation, compared to the ESV, which is more word for word, you notice the phrasing is different between the two. When you look at the effectual change, there really isn't any. A Christian who studied one over the other is not any better or worse off. Does this mean the two translations are equal? No, I think the concept of the ESV (much like a modern Geneva Bible) is a cleaner translation, because of its particular focus on things like word for word being more important than phrase for phrase based on who the translators are, it gives them [the translators] more authority to change things, even if barely slightly. I'd prefer the translators have as little responsibility as possible, much like the government should have the smallest responsibility as possible. To say that all protestant bibles etc. Do you realize how many people are under the umbrella of Protestant. Any non-Catholic Christian is considered a protestant, whether they claim the title or not. So I think you do wrong by your claim, in the future, please be more specific about who you say is blasphemous, or strike with a more appropriate strike. What you basically said is, all churches that are not catholic, are evil / retarded. This is not true, and I think most Catholics wouldn't agree with many directions taken by the catholic church, which many things in the catholic church is derived from the Vatican II flavor of Bible, which is now considered one of the worst translations (ditched by the catholic church for a while I'm pretty sure [I'm not catholic, so I don't really follow modern Catholicism]).
Oh yea, I've been doing this for over 40 years.
Qumran scrolls are about the same age as the Septuagint (285 BC) and date from 300 BC to 100 AD. What's interesting is that the Qumran scrolls agree with the accuracy of the Septuagint more so than the Masoretic Texts.
The inspiration that God provides is observable throughout Nature. It is foremost in daily life. The Bible is only witness to this. Yet, it is all too commonly ignored. Biblical inerrancy is the belief that Scripture is completely without error. This has has become a central belief of evangelicalism. Let's get this straight. The Bible is not the Son of God. It is a human book. As a human book, it is vulnerable to the errors of human and historical limitations. I could provide ample evidence of this, but these detailed examples are for another time. In addition, the many books of the Bible and not included in the Bible is a testament of human short comings and historical limitations. The Bible is not a divine oracle sent down from heaven either. It does however bears witness to the Word of God, and it is therefore an indirect form of the Word by the Holy Spirit [emphasis added]. In other words, the Bible points beyond itself to the Word of God; it does not contain within itself the Word. The Word of God is not bound to a book, nor should it be, yet this human book becomes Godβs Word in its witness [emphasis added]. We depend on the faithfulness of the Holy Spirit to lead us into all truth, not on the βperfectionβ of a book. The key word here is 'Holy Spirit' or from the Greek 'pneuma', who's Divine Order is observable throughout Nature and it's Laws.
I have this 1599 version. Generally speaking protestant bibles are based on the corrupted Masoretic Texts.
You stated this, I didn't. I did say protestant Bibles are based on the Masoretic Texts and should be cross referenced with other Bibles including a good English-Greek Lexicon. I even check the Latin, as well.
I agree. You are making my point.
True, but there's more. And you stated it yourself -- ..."because English, as a language, blows chunks." This is why a good English-Greek Lexicon adds additional light on word definitions. Again, I could provide examples that would take up pages.
This does not eliminate the very Bible's categorized under these main branches of Christianity. Normally, the Pope isn't reading from the KJV. Or is a Baptist minister reading from the Catholic Jerusalem Bible. Nor is the Greek or Russian Orthodox reading anything other than the LXX.
You stated this. I didn't. I spoke of the Catholic pre-1964 Jerusalem bible. This is Vatican I era. Again, there are important insights the Old Jerusalem Bible can provide. For example in the old Jerusalem bible, Isaiah 34:14 mentions "....there too will Lilith take cover seeking rest." The NKJV states -- "Also the night creature shall rest there, and find for herself a place of rest. The KJV states -- " the screech owl also shall rest there, and find for herself a place of rest." And the HCSB says the following -- "Indeed, the night birds will stay there and will find a resting place.
If anyone knows who 'Lilith' is and the widespread belief of the deity during Isaiah's time, they would certainly have a much better understanding of this verse than the English translation of "night birds". One has to question why the name of Lilith was taken out. The question is did the translators not want the people to know? In the Jewish Kabbalah a part of the Pharisaic Talmud, Lilith is the first wife of Adam, and was banished from Eden. She became a demon and her special delight was to murder young children. The Canaanites use to sacrifice their first born and bury it in the wall of their home to pay homage to Lilith.
This is great. I think we are paying for the fact that the general populous has forgotten our past, and I don't mean what happened 50 years ago. One thing can be said for cultures who pass down their knowledge verbally is that it seems that they include the entire history.
This is the kind of history that people need to know and understand in order to recognize what is happening in the current space. Before I was awakened, I looked at history as "something that happened back then". Not as something that has been building over the course of time and forming the current space.
Never more has the term "forget your history, you are doomed to repeat it" meant so much.
Have you read the translation of the bible by an Italian..name escapes me..written for pope who did not want such truth out there? I keep meaning to read it..will put an end to all religions
Tried googling it. NADA. Clif high has also spoken of him. I know proper translation vofvholy spirit is not at all what people think...lotscof stuff about aliens in the Bible.
Give me the name of this Italian and more details so I can identify.
God is a Spirit that now dwells in the body of Jesus Christ. But Hebrew means βone who has crossed over from death to lifeβ but Hebrew is a thought process first before itβs a language. Paul spoke with a Hebrew tongue many who spoke different languages understood him! Think about that for a minute!
Jehova was a spirit that now dwells in the immortal body of Jesus.
God is more than this, as God is the Father (the God to whom Jesus prayed), the Son (Jesus/Jehova), and also the Holy Ghost. God ("Elohim") is a plural word. Ponder on Genesis 1:26 for a bit!
Hebrew is the language Eber spoke. Tell me what language was that? Also, I am talking strictly of the written language, not the many Canaanite spoken languages.
Hebrew letters have gone through several revisions. It's true the original letter versions of most of the books of the OT fell out of use. However we still have plenty of writings of such letters, and know how to read them.
Ever heard of the Judean Desert Scrolls which predate the Masoretes by a thousand years? Those scrolls are still readable today. In fact they closely match what the Masoretes produced. Most of them use the more modern Hebrew letters, some of them use the older Hebrew. Some use both. An Aleph is still an Aleph whether the character for it is drawn like an X or drawn like an Ox's head.
All the Masoretes did was come up with a canonical text by deciding between variant spellings and synonymous wording, standardized chapters, and added vowels around the text and punctuation marks. From the text itself, the differences between that and texts a millennia earlier are minute.
The Masoretes were not Pharisaic Jews, they were Karaite Jews.
The original Septuagint was only on the first 5 books of the OT, and has been long lost, as it was replaced by many later updated Greek translations. The Judean Desert Scrolls though are from the time frame you mention, and are in old Hebrew lettering, new Hebrew lettering, and Greek.
Nice wishful thinking.
We can say that many of the Greek in our hands today used translation techniques from those first translations. But no authoritative original Greek version exists.
If there was an original authoritative Greek version extant on everything, there would have been no reason for Aquila or various Church Fathers to do their own translations (or translation updates).
Anything New Testament is "antisemitic"
Use this, guys!
Now we can say that referring to him as the Prophet Mohammad is both anti-Christian AND anti-Semitic!
Experts are saying Christmas lights make certain groups feel uncomfortable. Itβs time to end bigotry.
fact, most women should not wear yoga pants in public. the only advantage to a mask (which I don't wear) would be a good catch for when I throw up in my mouth and a little bit escapes.
Are those experts experts at Christmas lights or experts at knowing when people feel uncomfortable?
The Daily Beast is the sorriest excuse of 'journalism '. 1000 monkeys could write better than they do.
KEK
MSN. Jews. Hell awaits. But itβs a dry heatβ¦
πππthe Khazarian Mafias πππ they make this shit label up, ignore it. It's not antisemitism, I just hate evil people! Period.
Pretty sure Jesus was a semite.
Yes. All the people descendant of Shem, Noah's son, are "Semite". This is a regional genealogy that includes peoples of Arabic and Ethopian origin.
So then Jews are technically anti-semitic. Haha.
Yep
Anyone who feels that way can smd
Sounds like man made up a bunch of different religions to keep you all from getting along so they can control you.
There are many religions, and I don't think you are far off the mark. There is absolutely ONE truth. Our aim as mankind should be to find that ONE truth. That is why faith is so important. If God descended on mankind once every 10 years and said, X religion is correct, everyone believe X, then we like sheep could all believe X, there wouldn't be faith, there would be blind obedience. Instead, God gave man enough evidence to believe in him, and the deeper you dig, the more "anomalies" in the pagan beliefs, and more align with the Bible. Many who have set out to disprove the Bible, often become Christians themselves, and very fervent for it too. There is enough out there that you could come to a completely different conclusion as well. There's enough confusing things out there, that it's hard to know what is true and not true, and this doesn't even factor in the fake news media outlets confusing the confusion even more. So then, each man believes in something, the atheist, agnostic, the sheep, the devout, the thinker. They all have a belief, and most put themselves as God, with believing we know better than God. That's not to say we shouldn't question our churches, our Bible translations, or even ask God, "WHY!?" because these things in and of themselves aren't wrong, but many are led down pathways of evil because of it. They say, all churches are evil, or all translations except X are wrong and heretical, or I'm right, and everyone else, even God is wrong, I'm the master of my own life, you can easily become like the woman from Proverbs who says, "I am, and besides me, there is no other." Most sins we commit, we actually place ourselves above God, as you break down the sins. Take theft for example. You may steal something from a rich man, he won't notice, and you think he doesn't deserve it, and you've done so much good in your life, it shouldn't matter. So you steal. People said, ok, God says don't steal, and you stole, book closed, say X Hail Mary's and go about your business, not a big deal. I disagree, you steal, but what was the bigger sin, what God has given you isn't enough, you tell God that his gifts are insufficient for your needs, and you need to go around his back to get what you deserve. The sin is predominantly a sin against God, not against man, as the rich man could easily replace what you stole if he even noticed it was gone in the first place. This is the depths of sin that people even in the best of churches out there are still lacking. I ask, why do our fellow believers not know this, this OUGHT to be basic. in closing i've ranted too much. I don't think that is true of all religions, very broad brush, but i think you have validity to your claim.
So once again we're letting unbelievers tell us about our own faith and pretend to know the scripture more than people who have been studying it for literally decades and have devoted their whole lives to God and to a proper understanding of His word.
First of all, the Talmud is a massive, encyclopedic collection of rabbinic teachings and commentaries on the law, not to be confused with the actual Bible itself.
Second, the Koran was written by a pedophilic warlord who designed a unique new religion in order to gain power for himself and has resulted in the bloodiest and most violent movement to ever survive the modern era until Marxism came upon the scene to eclipse Islam as the most genocidal ideology on the planet. It has nothing to do with the Bible other than the fact that it tried to co-opt Jewish and Christian theological concepts and bend them to its own ends.
Third, I'm not sure what the name of God in the ancient Hebrew has to do with any of this discussion.
Fourth, the "bath salts" comment was purely ad-hominem attack and beneath the level of discussion one should demand in any context.
Why is this stickied?? Because, get fuct, 666.
Hahahahahahaha. This actually makes me laugh.
This is satire, right? Please tell me this is satire.
Sounds like their team is losing.
Title updoot.
Only descended from King David using human law. He is God in the flesh.
Both Joseph AND Mary.
Don't want to debate...it's not allowed on this platform. If you are interested you will find answers for yourself. Start with. the pagan religion before Jesus. Look at astrotheology and Clif high has very good research contacts. This is what Q wanted. Research..don't blindly accept what you are told by vested interests. It's.not just big pharma that do it.
Just listen to what Sarah Silverman thinks of Jesus: https://www.bitchute.com/video/JuDrjmZN5Inc/
And just like that, antisemite is meaningless.
Soon every knee (even the jewish knees) will kneel and every tongue (even the jewish tongues) will confess aloud that Jesus Christ is indeed God Amighty! Oh the joy for those of us who already do! π