True... idiocy upon idiocy. What we don't know, though, is how sick (with whatever) any of these people were such that they felt the need to get tested.
I have the same question. It would be interesting to see the incidence of ALL diseases based on vaccine status. I suspect the jabbed are experiencing antibody-dependent enhancement(ADE) and are increasingly susceptible to all diseases. I think the DMED report leaked a couple months back shows this.
Link: https://greatawakening.win/p/141YDyNIEb/dmed-report/c/
That’s what I thought, but Walgreens breaks out the tests given by vax status as well and 27% were unvaxxed so I suspect the unvaxxed are over-represented in this data.
Besides, this is “rates of positivity” so it’s automatically adjusted for differing numbers of people per cohort.
You might argue that vaxxed are more likely to get tested when feeling sick, but then you have to wonder why did 90% of the unvaxxed go get tested?
I think this data is pretty clear: the vaxxed are getting sick more readily than the unvaxxed. This is ADE or negative efficacy (same thing).
Yes, you understand that correctly; however, it is a limited window, representing only Walgreen customers and not the general population. Still, though, it's quite an amazing picture of that limited data subset.
Unvaccinated are also less likely to get tested. I tested once sadly last year. My digestive tract has been messed up since then. Developed GERD and IBS. Just now getting better.
I suspected the unvaccinated were less likely to get tested as well. Then I went to the source report (page 3) and clicked on "proportion of tests". If you do this you will see that the unvaccinated accounted for 26.8% of the tests. All others tested had received at least one jab(73.2%). There is a US coronavirus vaccine tracker that reports 77% of US population has received at least one jab.
Link: https://usafacts.org/visualizations/covid-vaccine-tracker-states/
Holy shit - over 3/4 of the US (they’re trying to say) succumbed to this? I really have a hard time believing that. It was so easy just to say no, I’m not doing it, my body my choice.
So true. I have two new neighbors on either side of me. We met outside in the yard one day and each of them brought up some dumbass show they watch and think is important. I replied"we don't really watch TV so not familiar with this show, tell me more" to which both families' immediate response was something like, "oh, we don't watch either" - like some sort of defense to the embarrassment of watching TV. Well, during the evenings, we can see their TVs and the lights at night, especially. Their TVs are on literally all day long. People in America are addicts.
It’s 95% of adults here in Ireland. They did close pubs, businesses & have travel restrictions hard (2km then 10km) until the vax came along though & pushed it hard as the “way out”.
I hear you, I’m in Massachusetts and it’s pretty bad here overall with regards to friends and family who felt like they had no choice but to take it. I really felt like it was a 50% of people kind of thing, which is still an amazingly large number.
I just kept saying to my family and friends that this was all being rushed with too much coercive pressure from all angles, too much for me to feel comfortable. I’m a scientist and for everyone to in unison be saying to trust the science just made me sick to hear, so I’d rather take the wait and see approach/be a part of the control group
I thought the same thing, but the data shows that the unvaccinated are the only group to have a higher proportion of tests than positivity, so even when the unvaccinated get tested, they are less likely to have Covid.
Oh the flip side if you had the shot in less than 5 mth, couldn’t you argue the vaccine is at full potential ie your body hasn’t had time to clear out the stuff inside the vax?
But I think if your body could actually 'clear out the stuff inside the vax', you could argue that the vax is only a 'short-term threat'.
We certainly don't know all of the things the vasxx does, but one that is confirmed is some sort of 'excess clotting'. That seems like an (insidious) long-term threat.
If it doesn't kill you (in the short term), then it weakens (strangles) your body from the inside - leaving you more susceptible to any number of ailments.
I don't think we will truly know what's going on until after a 'purge' of the medical industry. Just too many lies right now.
It’s also interesting that you test positive at a higher rate after the vaxx has been in for more than 5 months.
The ones that have a more recent booster have a slightly lower positivity rate. Almost closer to the unvaccinated but not quite. Interesting. Sure makes the VAIDS or ADE idea more plausible.
If I trusted the data (and I don't), I could argue that there seems to be (at least) two aspects of the vax - (1) something that lowers C-19 susceptibility in the short term (but wears off), and (2) something else that harms you 'generally' in the long term.
In reality, I think there are far more than two aspects of the vax.
I'm just staying unvaxxed, and waiting (somewhat patiently) for the medical industry to be purged.
Our hospital quietly and unceremoniously removed our weekly stats of ICU inpatients because our number were relatively low throughout the entire pandemic and a few months before they removed it entire it was constant that our inpatient and vaccinated were well over 70%. I think the most even I saw was 50%/50% but the vaccinated were ALWAYS higher.
The thing that pisses me off is there were Doctors out there saying this exact scenario was likely to happen. But were silenced. I wish I could find those reports now.
Clearly indicates that after minimal protection wears off people are more likely to be infected. Possibly due to a weakened immune system. Long live the purebloods.
They can't identify variants, been saying this from the onset of delta bullshit. I code medical records and the test only says covid19, never says anything about a variant. That's totally made up just like all the bullshit surrounding covid19.🙄
Soooo... Im not vaccinated. If i get the sniffles i dont run out and get tested. I think people who are vaxed run out to get tested everytime they get sick, or take a poison home test.
If I understand it correctly, the unvaccinated group has the lowest positivity rate.
If the vaccine was just saline, we'd expect all the bars to be the same height, right?
So it appears from this that the vaccine makes you more likely to test positive?
Or more likely to take a faulty test.
Showing its a mental illness...
True... idiocy upon idiocy. What we don't know, though, is how sick (with whatever) any of these people were such that they felt the need to get tested.
I have the same question. It would be interesting to see the incidence of ALL diseases based on vaccine status. I suspect the jabbed are experiencing antibody-dependent enhancement(ADE) and are increasingly susceptible to all diseases. I think the DMED report leaked a couple months back shows this. Link: https://greatawakening.win/p/141YDyNIEb/dmed-report/c/
Great insight. And thanks for the link!
Now check the timeline for the increases in cases compared to when the FDA approved a fourth booster for the old and chronically ill.
You’ll see it started about two weeks after the announcement.
They are prolonging this shit with the boosters.
That’s what I thought, but Walgreens breaks out the tests given by vax status as well and 27% were unvaxxed so I suspect the unvaxxed are over-represented in this data.
Besides, this is “rates of positivity” so it’s automatically adjusted for differing numbers of people per cohort.
You might argue that vaxxed are more likely to get tested when feeling sick, but then you have to wonder why did 90% of the unvaxxed go get tested?
I think this data is pretty clear: the vaxxed are getting sick more readily than the unvaxxed. This is ADE or negative efficacy (same thing).
Perhaps the vaccine was designed to also prolong the pandemic by having people who took it test positive?
Now we're conspiracying! Good thought.
They are producing the spike proteins of the virus
Yes, you understand that correctly; however, it is a limited window, representing only Walgreen customers and not the general population. Still, though, it's quite an amazing picture of that limited data subset.
If DC politicians and Hollywood types hadn't been isolated from this list, it would've been so much worse.
This graphic also shows that over time, the positive results become more likely for those with more jabs.
3 doses more than 5 months ago being the worst at 21.6%.
Troubling is that we are still in the early days. What will this graphic look like in a year or 5 years?
there'd probably be some minor discrepancy, nothing's ever 1:1, but they'd all be about level, yes...
Source for report: https://www.walgreens.com/businesssolutions/covid-19-index.jsp
11.8% positivity rate increasing to 16.4% is a 38% increase in positive tests (4.5/11.8).
I think the other graph is more telling, the proportion of tests. 26.8% of the total tests, only 16.7% of the total positives.
Thank you for the source! I wonder how long they will leave it up...
Unvaccinated are also less likely to get tested. I tested once sadly last year. My digestive tract has been messed up since then. Developed GERD and IBS. Just now getting better.
and a liver cleanse - intense but worth it
Thanks
I suspected the unvaccinated were less likely to get tested as well. Then I went to the source report (page 3) and clicked on "proportion of tests". If you do this you will see that the unvaccinated accounted for 26.8% of the tests. All others tested had received at least one jab(73.2%). There is a US coronavirus vaccine tracker that reports 77% of US population has received at least one jab. Link: https://usafacts.org/visualizations/covid-vaccine-tracker-states/
Holy shit - over 3/4 of the US (they’re trying to say) succumbed to this? I really have a hard time believing that. It was so easy just to say no, I’m not doing it, my body my choice.
So true. I have two new neighbors on either side of me. We met outside in the yard one day and each of them brought up some dumbass show they watch and think is important. I replied"we don't really watch TV so not familiar with this show, tell me more" to which both families' immediate response was something like, "oh, we don't watch either" - like some sort of defense to the embarrassment of watching TV. Well, during the evenings, we can see their TVs and the lights at night, especially. Their TVs are on literally all day long. People in America are addicts.
I had to quit my job and take half the wage elsewhere to avoid the jab
You had to save your like. WGAF about money when you're struggling to survive, or dead.
Very sorry to hear, but hugely respect your dedication to avoiding it
It’s 95% of adults here in Ireland. They did close pubs, businesses & have travel restrictions hard (2km then 10km) until the vax came along though & pushed it hard as the “way out”.
I hear you, I’m in Massachusetts and it’s pretty bad here overall with regards to friends and family who felt like they had no choice but to take it. I really felt like it was a 50% of people kind of thing, which is still an amazingly large number. I just kept saying to my family and friends that this was all being rushed with too much coercive pressure from all angles, too much for me to feel comfortable. I’m a scientist and for everyone to in unison be saying to trust the science just made me sick to hear, so I’d rather take the wait and see approach/be a part of the control group
Thanks! I love your way to explain being unvaxxed.. I'm part of the control group. Sounds so official and science like. 😁
I thought the same thing, but the data shows that the unvaccinated are the only group to have a higher proportion of tests than positivity, so even when the unvaccinated get tested, they are less likely to have Covid.
Wow
Very misleading graph. (Is it intentional?)
The columns are out of chronological order. The '2 doses greater than 5 months' should be to the right of the more 'less than 5 months'.
The proper order should be:
If the columns are rearranged, it is far easier to see the pattern: The longer you are vaxxed, the more susceptible you are.
Oh the flip side if you had the shot in less than 5 mth, couldn’t you argue the vaccine is at full potential ie your body hasn’t had time to clear out the stuff inside the vax?
Fair comment.
But I think if your body could actually 'clear out the stuff inside the vax', you could argue that the vax is only a 'short-term threat'.
We certainly don't know all of the things the vasxx does, but one that is confirmed is some sort of 'excess clotting'. That seems like an (insidious) long-term threat.
If it doesn't kill you (in the short term), then it weakens (strangles) your body from the inside - leaving you more susceptible to any number of ailments.
I don't think we will truly know what's going on until after a 'purge' of the medical industry. Just too many lies right now.
It’s also interesting that you test positive at a higher rate after the vaxx has been in for more than 5 months.
The ones that have a more recent booster have a slightly lower positivity rate. Almost closer to the unvaccinated but not quite. Interesting. Sure makes the VAIDS or ADE idea more plausible.
If I trusted the data (and I don't), I could argue that there seems to be (at least) two aspects of the vax - (1) something that lowers C-19 susceptibility in the short term (but wears off), and (2) something else that harms you 'generally' in the long term.
In reality, I think there are far more than two aspects of the vax.
I'm just staying unvaxxed, and waiting (somewhat patiently) for the medical industry to be purged.
It’s also interesting that the only group that tested positive at a lower rate compared to the proportion of tests done is the unvaxxed group.
For a while I was struggling to understand why there were so many unvaxxed (i.e., NON-brainwashed) were getting tested.
Then I remembered the (job-related) mandatory weekly testing.
So many variables to take into consideration. Too little transparency on the data.
Our hospital quietly and unceremoniously removed our weekly stats of ICU inpatients because our number were relatively low throughout the entire pandemic and a few months before they removed it entire it was constant that our inpatient and vaccinated were well over 70%. I think the most even I saw was 50%/50% but the vaccinated were ALWAYS higher.
The thing that pisses me off is there were Doctors out there saying this exact scenario was likely to happen. But were silenced. I wish I could find those reports now.
Kinda looks like omicron killed all the strains.
funny how evolution works...
With each jab increasing ones odds of testing positive, I suspect this report will be taken down soon.
Clearly indicates that after minimal protection wears off people are more likely to be infected. Possibly due to a weakened immune system. Long live the purebloods.
This chart is useful in the information war, for sure.
I am still confused, though: is there a foolproof test for covid-19, yet? And how are they able to identify the variants?
They can't identify variants, been saying this from the onset of delta bullshit. I code medical records and the test only says covid19, never says anything about a variant. That's totally made up just like all the bullshit surrounding covid19.🙄
Thanks for the insight. That's what I have figured... but why would they put this out? White Hats, possibly?
Looks like your immune system is able to recover the farther away from vaccination you get
Meanwhile Rhode Island Dems want to fine the unvaxxed on a monthly basis! https://patriotnewsfeed.com/rhode-island-lawmakers-bell/
Soooo... Im not vaccinated. If i get the sniffles i dont run out and get tested. I think people who are vaxed run out to get tested everytime they get sick, or take a poison home test.
Me thinks many thinks like me.
I see i misunderstood the chart.