FLAT EARTH DEBATE THREAD
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
Comments (113)
sorted by:
FE is a CIA/NASA psy-op. Change my mind
The RECENT Globe Theory is a CIA/NASA psy-op. CHANGE MY MIND...
It isn't coincidence that NASA, WWII and the Globe all started around the same time... I recall my grandmother telling me she learnt the earth was flat in elementary school (early 90s) and the globe was one of the first things taught to my children via TV shows, School, etc.... I was still asleep turning that time due to the fact we ARE indoctrinated with "knowledge" at an early age.
What FACTS do you have the disproves the FE Theory?
The idea (reality, I say) far predates the CIA. The PSYOP is getting us to believe in space and all the fuckery that they can sell along with it (like an alien invasion to, as Reagen kept saying, get all the nations to join up...NWO).
Plus if it is flat it proves there must be a God
Well it certainly would eliminate big bang as a possibly of being our origin story.
Which is why I believe they created the lie. Bible mentions the firmament many times.
I would, but i largely agree with you. The heavily advertised (i.e. funded) flat earth psyop is quite real, though i don’t speculate on which agencies/parties are involved.
What most people misunderstand, likely including yourself, is the primary purpose of the flat earth psyop. It is really to make flat earth research seem so offensively stupid that no one ever bothers studying the important subject. It is most assuredly NOT to spread interest in the subject, contrary to popular (and heavily encouraged/advertised) misconception.
If you are interested in learning more about the subject, why it is so important, and/or exchanging our views on it - please join us on flatearthresearch to do just that!
It’s going to take a while to tear down the Masonic Veil hanging over this world. The Earth is Flat. Outer space is not what you are seeing when you look up and it does not exist. Dinosaurs are a hoax, along with evolution, and gravity. Our timeline is a lie. Our past is a lie. Giants are real. Fallen angels are real. And it goes on and on and on. We live in the little season.
So what exist beyond this flat earth of yours genius. Some of you seriously lack critical thinking skills.
God's spiritual realm.
If the earth were flat, cats would have already knocked everything off the edge by now. :)
Kek
"The sun doesn't set, what you are seeing is a trick played on our eyes helped by the limits of our own sight."
aka Perspective. The same thing that makes rows of telephone polls get smaller and smaller the farther away they get from you - until you can't see them anymore.
u/#cmon
Call me crazy, but I think it is a spheroid more akin to a Torus.
https://www.horntorus.com/atom-model/Lissajous12-11.gif
The Magnetic Poles line up with that theory.
Hollow Earth Theories line up with it as well:
https://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/boe/img/pl46.jpg
https://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/boe/boe33.htm
Why is the northern ice cap so much thinner than the southern?
Because one is set to suck and the other to blow.
What happens if there's a magnetic shift?
They swap, and one goes from suck to blow and the other from blow to suck?
Would great floods and devastating earthquakes ensue?
Atlantis going under?
Is it possible Atlantis was located at the North Pole (then the South Pole) and under our current Antarctica there is an immense ice shelf harboring archipelagos from the solar radiation?
Did the NAZI's build bases there?
Why?
Because there is a massive mound of core Earth metals and materials spewing out every second? Tons of gold and precious metals?
All speculation, mind you.
But fun to think about.
No, the world is not flat.
But I don't think it's perfectly round, either.
It's a squishy thing, more like an egg on its side, pointing towards the moon.
With a big-ass hole in the middle, covered over by ice caps.
That's my theory, but I'm open to it being wrong. It would explain a lot, however.
I like the idea of it being a squishy egg and since you're right about this kind of stuff being fun to look into, I will check out your links. I feel like theres too much FE stuff to overcome but I'll keep an open mind.
The Inner Earth theory is believable and can actually fit the FE theory... what if Byrd assumed he was entering an inner-earth once past the ice wall because he was required to descend miles below the other side of the ice wall before he seen land. Could the wall be 10x higher on the other side making it seem like you're entering the core of the earth but in-fact you are just entering the next ring of Atlantis!
I have read this theory as well but why then is everyone aloud to go to the north pole including planes flying over it?
Because from the surface, it looks completely covered in ice.
Go under the ice and what do you find?
Well, ask Russia. They're the only ones who've ever bothered planting a flag down there.
https://www.reuters.com/article/idINIndia-28784420070802
So me a flight path the goes directly over the "North Pole"... I think you're are mistaken and flights do not fly over the north or south poles..... Also if you are correct then why cant we fly over the south pole as well?
I do not know if they go "directly" over the north pole but close enough to see it from the air. Nobody is aloud anywhere near the Sole pole.
"Speed" is a relative thing. Compared to the surface of the Earth, we are, at least in general, travelling at 0 MPH.
The way you feel rotation is by the Coriolis effect, or the Coriolis force. This force is easily seen on any rotating device (like a merry go round). When you model the behavior of this force in the language of math (what we call "physics") it works out to:
F = m dw/dt
where "w" is really omega. This omega stands for the angular (rotational) velocity. In this framework, we aren't moving at "1000 MPH," we are moving at 1 rotation per day, or 1 rotation per 86,400 seconds, which is actually REALLY slow. Thus the coriolis force is very small, because dw/dt is very small..
If you were to create a merry go round that was 8000 miles wide and set it spinning at one rotation per day, you would feel the exact same force as if you made one 10 feet wide and set it spinning at one rotation per day, which is to say, you wouldn't feel a thing. We have to set up fairly sensitive experiments to measure this force on earth.
The best experiment to measure our rotating planet is a Foucault's pendulum experiment. This experiment not only shows that we are spinning, but because it always comes up with a different result depending on your latitude, you can tell, with this experiment, exactly what latitude you are at.
The results of any such Foucault's pendulum experiment match with the mathematical model of what the behavior of a pendulum would look like if one were to put one on a sphere. This model has nothing specifically to do with earth. It's just the model behavior of a pendulum on a rotating sphere. It just so happens to work out perfectly when one measures the precession of a large pendulum anywhere on the surface of the earth.
This similarly completely disregards all physics. I'm not suggesting physics is some perfect thing, or that there is no fuckery contained in physics, science, or any other area of our "knowledge;" however, it isn't all fuckery. When we make models of behaviour, and our models match experiment/experience, our models prove themselves useful. That doesn't make them "truth," but if you are going to present arguments against the conclusions, you must at least address the experiments that show strong evidence against your arguments.
Your "common sense" does not match experience, except by misapplying experience to larger phenomenon. For example, if you take your experience on a merry go round and apply it to the earth, all sorts of reasonable protests arise. But if you appreciate that a merry go round isn't about "speed" but about angular speed, which is something anyone with two different sized merry go rounds can corroborate, then you will realize that your small scale of experience is not sufficient to make predictions of larger scale events, and thus should not be applied to that task.
REMOVAL REASON: SEND TO conspiracies.win
This type of stuff makes everything else here on this Board lose credibility.
Where are your counter arguments then since it is such a non-nonsensical theory?
Really, this is the line? Lol.
That's the plan! This is bait to lump the people here with flat earthers so the entire movement is easily dismissed.
Science is Babylonian Magick reincarnated, making mysterious out of simple.
<Buckles seatbelt>
<Puts on peril-sensitive sunglasses and grabs towel>
When you're on an airplane hurtling through the sky at 500mph, and you walk down the aisle to the lavatory, do you feel like you're traveling 500mph? No. This is basic relativity.
If you're on an airplane going 500mph, and you stand in the aisle and jump straight up, do you smash into the back of the airplane? No. Because when you lifted off, you were already going 500mph. Same with airplanes that take off and travel - they are already traveling at the same relative speed as the Earth.
There are quite a few more factors to account for the temperature of a certain place on Earth than just how many or how few photons hit it.
The curvature is so gradual as to be rounded off. If you measure something, and it's exactly 18.000000002 meters long, you can safely drop the .000000002.
Not sure what you're talking about here but yes, molecules of hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, etc floating around in a vacuum will attract one another and make a "bubble". We refer to this phenomenon as "gravity".
Even if it were, that doesn't prove or disprove a flat earth.
This is not evidence of a flat or otherwise earth.
Globalists don't want to offend those in the southern hemisphere. How would you propose displaying a 3D projection onto a 2D surface?
Opinion, not evidence.
Proof?
And when I was a child, I thought chocolate milk came from brown cows. Your point?
Yep,parts of clouds closer to the sun get hotter.
You flat earthers always start off with seemingly reasonable points, then you devolve into using opinions as facts. Stop doing that.
How does this imply a flat earth?
Because it's tidally locked.
This is called gravitational lensing. It's pretty simple science.
And if the Earth's axis was pointed at Betelgeuse, then Betelgeuse would be the North Star. What's your point?
But I'm inside of a plane, not hanging onto it on the outside like an Afghan.
Air bubbles in space is the phenomenon that happens when liars are caught filimg their shit underwater. Also look into the cables they use to fool people into thinking they're floating around and doing backflips.
They could use literally anything else but a FE map if they wanted to, but they have to continue to put all of their trickery right in our faces.
How is that silly? Its perspective.
It implies FE because they're lying about the size and distance of the sun and moon, two objects which are important to the discussion at hand.
I know about tidal lock and the idea is way more ridiculous than FE.
Gravity is pretty much a hoax and Newton the perpetrator. Dont tell me you believe that bullshit about an apple falling on his head. He was a grown man, he'd never seen anything fall before that point in time? Lol.
My point is it wouldnt be perfect circle patterns if we're really flying around at 66,600 MPH while expanding at a rate of 500,000 MPH on top of the spinning. Jesus, even typing these numbers is like "wtf" lol. Come on.
As they say, you can lead an idiot to water but you can’t make them think. Enjoy your Mac and chesse.
Members of this forum with brains are a good sight to see. Thank you for aiding in putting the crazies in their place.
Sit on a merry go round spinning one revolution in 24 hrs and tell me if you feel it moving. Also i know a great flat earth debate discord server where globers will debate you objectively.
Moving at 1000mph?
In a relatively straight line. I once flew on a plane at 600mph and comfortably drank water and ate food. Can you tell me why my can of soda didn't crash into my face at 600mph while i was holding it?
"If you don't understand temperature from the sun affecting poles differently on a spinning globe...flat Earth will not help you explain that."
A Flat Earth (if true) would still be Electromagnetic.
While we fly around at 66,600 MPH and while the galaxy expands at some even crazier number that I cant remember (I think it's literally like 500,000 MPH or so).
"When I visit the other side of the world it is dark there when it is day here, how do you even attempt to explain that in flat Earth world?"
The Sun emits directional light and moves around the face of the earth like watch hands. Therefore, only certain areas of the earth are in light and the other areas in darkness. Think of a "flashlight shining down" for a sun
That makes no sense unless you're saying the Sun and moon are tiny in comparison to Earth.
Correct. They are small. Smaller than the Earth. In fact, the Moon and the Sun are roughly the same size. Unless we want to say that the proportion and distance the Moon and the Sun are from the earth are just so as to make them only appear to be the same size?
You've got to figure out in your model why the moon ever goes dark then among other problems.
Can aircraft reach the sun and moon?
Why don't either of them get visibly much larger when you approach them in a plane?
How do seasons work in a FE model?
First of all, I'm not 100% bought into a FE model - although I am leaning that way. It's always wise to have a little bit of skepticism with any model one adheres to. You can call me a Spheroid Agnostic. Second, I'll readily admit that there are some conundrums in the FE model, but there are actually issues in both Spheroid Earth and Flat Earth models that can't be explained or seem counterintuitive. A current lack of explanation doesn't negate the entire model.
Whether Man has been to the moon has been discussed at length in this forum. Nothing new can be added here. Search.
They just might. The highest altitude a plane has flown is 123,523 feet. That's 23 miles up. In the Flat Earth model it is surmised that the Sun and Moon are roughly 3000(+-) miles up. So in that plane, those heavenly bodies may have appeared larger. A passenger plane, however, flies at only41,000 feet. That's a dismal 7 miles up. To the naked eye, the Sun and the Moon may not appear to be much larger at that hight.
Simple.
According to flat earthers the earth is a disk and the sun (which is actually a lot smaller and a lot closer to us than what scientists would have you believe) hovers and moves around over this disk.
Seasons happen because the sun doesn't stick to the same path. When it's summer in the northern half of the disk (you can't call it the northern hemisphere, a hemisphere is a half of a SPHERE) that is because the sun is closer to that part of the disk, when it's winter in the north it is because the sun is hanging out over the southern half-disk.
Model of seasonal paths in Flat Earth: https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-2cec772233e8cfa4067f3b92a142d346-pjlq
Models showing day and night: https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=https://arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/Q6JIZKE2GZEBXIV4ENMHWVNY4E.gif&w=540
Round Earth far better explains many issues, including moon phases.
I didn't say "whether man has been to the moon" I said can aircraft get there in FE model since the sun and moon are so close to the Earth?
Even at 10% increase in distance would show a drastic increase in size.
The sun and moon just oscillate in area of orbit season to season because...?
Modern Mechanics describes how on a Flat Earth the sun can be computed to 3,000 miles via triangulation, whereas on a globe earth those same angles can calculate the sun to nearly 93 million miles away:
Image: https://wiki.tfes.org/images/thumb/e/ea/Xlg_globe_3.jpg/500px-Xlg_globe_3.jpg
Round earthers cant explain why, with all the massive amount of movement the Earth is experiencing (1000mph rotation, 55,000mph around the Sun, and our solar system moving 500,000mph through our galaxy and our galaxy is moving too) why we see the same constellations in the sky and Polaris never moves. That's a problem for Round Earthers.
Ive given the altitudes that our best planes can reach, and mentioned the supposed height the Sun is located at in the FE model. Your answer lies therein.
I'm not sure exactly what your asking here? If I follow your question, then I would answer, "Because that's what they were created to do."
Find a spot where lots of air traffic happens. Look at plane flying towards your direction while it is far away. The plane will appear to be flying almost straight up. When the plane is directly overhead it will appear flying normally straight. When the plane is leaving you it will start to appear as if it was flying nose down. The further the plane the more extreme the angle appears. As far as motion it is simple based on relativity and perspective. When you stir the water in the Atlantic in Florida do people in Europe or africa feel it? Of course not
Do you know how relativity works? Especially when enclosed within a pressurised system (atmosphere).
When you fly on a plane you don't feel like you are moving hundreds of miles an hour...same concept.
Airplanes move within the confines of that pressurized system. Like if I were to walk on a train.
When I visit the other side of the world it is dark there when it is day here, how do you even attempt to explain that in flat Earth world?
If you don't understand temperature from the sun affecting poles differently on a spinning globe...flat Earth will not help you explain that.
Roads, railroads, canals, etc like houses can easily accommodate curvature...which is so much less of an incline than normal hills. I live on the side of a hill in a hilly area...
The Bible says under the firmament (atmosphere) not dome. When you reach the Antarctic or even South America does the sky become closer? Is it farther away at the Artic?
I agree Antarctica is suspicious.
You can see the curvature of the Earth in videos of space, even from amateurs who launch weather balloons.
Sun's distance from us and relation to moon is more a matter of God's provision than FE.
You can't see through the moon...
It actually does say Dome - or def implies something solid. Take a look at a good number of other, accurate, translations, including the Jewish Bible translated directly from the Hebrew:
https://biblehub.com/genesis/1-6.htm
Also check out the word translated "Expanse/Firmament/Dome" - Raqia
https://biblehub.com/hebrew/7549.htm "רָקִיעַ noun masculineGenesis 1:6 extended surface, (solid) expanse (as if beaten out; compare Job 37:18)"
Almost all photos showing a curvature are using a fish eye lens
Yeah I'm not saying we understand everything about the firmament, especially at the time of the Earth's creation, but it doesn't imply dome afaik.
The firmament may have been much more "solid" (perhaps pre fall). Who know what kind of effect that had on climate, magnetic field, gamma rays, etc? I trust scripture above our current understandings, I just don't think it implies FE.
But when you're flying in a plane you're inside of it, not on top of it. It's not the same as walking on a train.
It's dark on the other side because of the suns journey just above us. Explain the localized hot spots in the clouds.
They dont have to account for curvature, because its flat. There was even a Nobel study done that proved that some US states are literally flatter than IHOP pancakes.
Those pictures are taken with fish eye lens or otherwise faked. Everything NASA does is fake. See moon landing and space bubbles, and the picture of freemasons posing in front of the lunar lander. Also see all the wildly different pictures of Earth they have given us throughout the years.
You speak of God but it is Flat Earth which is God country. Space is a freemasonic hoax.
The atmosphere is the enclosing train in this metaphor. You are within the atmosphere when flying.
What do you mean by "the sun's journey" ? Where does it go? Does the Sun revolve around the Earth in FE theory?
Localized hot spots can be for any number of reasons...same when you find a localized hot spot in a lake.
The hill my house and road are on are not flat....You acknowledge curvature would be far, far less of an incline right?
I said amateurs not NASA.
You mean dome.
Think of the Earth like a flat plate, and then above it are the sun and moon going around in circles illuminating the surface.
What reasons? Have you seen the pictures?
I cant speak for your house on a hill but it sounds like a lovely place.
NASA are amateurs, except at deceiving the public. But in all seriousness, yes anyone launching shit "into space" is a faker.
In your model of the Earth, what causes "night" then? The sun would always be visible to the entire plane.
how can an enclosed pressurized system be next to the vacuum of "space"?
As far as we know, gravity, which isn't well understood but is theorized to be a force caused by a huge mass moving through spacetime.
The layers and layers of air create higher pressure the closer to the surface you get. Similarly to how when you dive deeper underwater you get higher and higher pressure due to all the water above.
I'm suspicious of the entire concept of gravity, as we are taught it anyway. It COULD be a grift that sort of fills in the blanks of physics and mathematics that we don't fully understand. Then we apply it to astronomy and convince ourselves we know how the universe works.
Understandable...there is an argument for density between different matter causing "sinking" but that would only explain within our atmosphere, not space or why the planets revolve around the sun.
research..... density and buoyancy
https://rumble.com/search/video?q=density%20and%20buoyancy
Gravity. Gravity is king In space. Look at the gas giants. Balls of gas held together by what? Gravity.
research..... density and buoyancy
https://rumble.com/vwsk3f-flat-earth-density-and-buoyancy-.html
https://rumble.com/v1ecag3-buoyancy-and-density-not-gravity.html
I can't wrap my head around a couple questions
So, how does the ocean water not spill off the edge of the flat earth? And sailing vessels would just crash into the dome wall if thats what would keep the water in? C'mon, man!
Ice border (Antarctica) keeps everything in its place.
Sailing vessels have been photographed next to the ice shelf (Antarctica).
The blue dome wall cannot be penetrated by rockets. They have tried.
Amazing!! Where is the proof ?
Go on a sailing expedition to Antarctica with Jeff Bezos and the like. You will see all the proof you wish to know.
Great. Make the arrangements and I’ll go.
the "blue dome" in my opinion is Frozen Oxygen "Blue Ice"..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=38&v=_bebl31yOO0&feature=emb_title
https://projectyourself.com/blogs/news/sky-blue-stone
https://www.ancient-code.com/researcher-discovers-a-55-000-year-old-artifact-made-out-of-oxygen/
read Genesis - God separated the waters - Why is the sky water blue?
Why does it get foggy and yellow when there is pollution ? Why would pollution on earth change the color of sky water ? The answer is the color of the sky is reflection from earths oceans. This is why at night you don’t see blue up there. Instead the light comes in from the moon stars, and planets. What would happen if you shine a powerful light to the night sky. Would you see blue? No. Because most of the earth surface where you are is dark at night. So no blue reflections.
Water is made of Oxygen.. the Oxygen in the sky get colder as you ascend therefore the Oxygen freezes at a certain height. That is what they are trying to “break through” and what HRC mentioned we cracked. That “glass ceiling” is actually ‘Blue Stone’ or frozen pure oxygen. They are doing tests on it in Antarctica and it can only be tested there due to the extreme cold requirement
Genesis 1:7 “And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.”
The ice wall holds everything in and patrol vessels keep everyone away who's not supposed to be out there. And if you try to fly out there they will shoot you down if you dont comply with their orders to turn around.
So its really cold all the way around the edge? Explain please. And so since the early explorers sailed the seas, they have decided that nobody shall reveal this? Ever! Not one leak!?
Because it makes more sense that way if you accept that the sun is not some ungodly big powerhouse. It's small and close.
Edit: They didnt just lie or withhold the truth, as I said in the OP there were lots of different civilizations who knew about FE.
ice wall
Why does the ocean water not sit level if it is a ball?
Lol you can’t be that dumb. Waves, movement, and you guessed it! Gravity.
Why can you see clear across Lake Michigan (90 miles) with powerful lenses and see land when there should be 60 ft of curvature for 90 miles?
You can’t see ground level. You only see parts of higher ground due to atmospheric lensing. Two things that affect light, atmosphere and gravity.
https://hips.hearstapps.com/hmg-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/images/gettyimages-93221720-1519417409.jpg
https://cdn.britannica.com/44/123244-004-C679A7AE/Ross-Ice-Shelf.jpg?s=1500x700&q=85
Thank you for your contribution.
Zing! lol
Hey, look everyone. It's bait to lump you in with the flat earth people. This doesn't belong here.
Butt da maff, da maff proove it ball!
I'm not saying it's a FE or RE, but as much as we've been lied to it's probable either way. If they were to come up with such a massive lie, do you not think they'd have the math to "prove" it?
It's all a ploy to keep the disconnect growing between us and our Creator, our Heavenly Father, God. What better way than to insinuate we're infinitesimal beings floating on an infinitesimal planet in an enormous universe. Satan doesn't need us to believe in him, he just needs us not to believe in God...
Also, I prefer the term "dome-icile" ;)
I was thinking earlier about the origin of the word planets. We live on a planet surrounded by other planets. PLA-N-et. Flat plane contained under a control net? I don't care either way, but if the science and media pushes it- I believe the opposite. It's worked well for me these last several years.
FE is a CIA psyop meant to derail threads that get close to exposing truth.
I think you are right. If you look at the Illuminati card game about the flat earth. It mentions that they know a secret. I think the secret is none other than earth being a prison of some sort. But the flat earth part of it is complete nonsense.
Flights in the southern hemisphere to a different continent in the southern hemisphere have to go through northern hemisphere cities and take days.... Why?
If you look at a flat earth map, such as UN, you might be able to figure it out.
I know why - trying to make them think
Quantas Airlines flight 28.
Santiago, Chile to Sydney, Australia. Direct, non-stop, twice per week. 13 hours travel time.
So, you're wrong. However, this does not prove or disprove earth being flat or spherical. It simply proves that you're wrong about intercontinental, southern hemisphere flights "have to go through northern hemisphere cities and take days".
Direct flights in the southern hemisphere are indeed rare, but that's primarily because the southern hemisphere has significantly less land mass and population than the northern hemisphere. There just isn't the demand for flights down there like there is between North America, Europe, and Asia.
What the f? Lol what do you mean. If you fly from Argentina to South Africa you stay in the Southern Hemisphere, at what point do you fly over the northern?
Try and book a flight from Buenos Aires to Johannesburg - fastest I saw was almost 28 hrs. It's only 5,000 globe miles
That flight went through Istanbul. Some Newark or Europe.
LA to Tokyo is 5,400 globe miles and you can do it in under 11 hrs
Do your own research
Out of Every comment on here, I’m pretty sure not one of these peeps have been in “outer space” to see a big planet floating in a dark space to confirm the globe. We’ve all been programmed by a program on some device.. tell-the-vision tv, movie theater, computers, cgi , photos.. How many astronauts are there ? Not many, why is that? Have an open mind, like a child... Gotta unwind the strong held beliefs we’ve been forced to believe for generations.. waking up is freeing!
lol... this is a whole big list of stupid..... yes... the outside diameter of the earth is moving around 25,000 miles in a day.... the air/atmosphere travels with the earth.... thus the planes can easily fly against the rotation of the earth... if the atmosphere's surface wind was travelling at 1000 mph.... my beer would spill every time set it down. take your silly list and head on over to the Onion....
I read your comment with sarcasm. Imagine my surprise when it turned out you actually believe all of that lol.
HEY MODS!
What do we do with shill sh*t-posts that are designed to make the entire board look stupid?
A. Sticky them, so that other idiots can post stuff about ships falling off the edge of the Earth?
or....
B. Sh*t-can them?
I vote for "B".
I see free speech is alive and well on a forum where people complain about all the social media giants censoring us lol.
Free speech protects you from GOVERNMENT, not from forum rules. There's a conspiracy.win for you.
Any entity can choose to also allow for free speech if they agree with the values set forth in the constitution. It is my hope that a place such as this would be one such entity.
The First Amendment doesn’t absolve you of ridicule when you use it to make asinine statements.
And there are tards believing everything said by Juan osavin and Charlie ward. Whatever happened to Roseanne Barr? She was a big leader getting people to follow the tard grifters. Is she related to Bill Barr? When is Michael Jackson flying down in his ufo? Of all the dumb shit on the internet to get annoyed about, flat earth is harmless fun. Why get so butthurt over something you don't agree with?
There's plenty of other shit that makes the board look stupid...
Lizard people
Looking Glass
Aliens
Alternate Dimensions
Etc, etc
I find it rather amusing the shit that gets spewed on here yet by the same that strike down our brothers that believe in FE.
Add Biden being a clone to that list.
Debate is a silly game, and across purposes to learning and communication of any kind.
To anyone with an earnest interest in exploring/discussing the subject (rather than mindless and fruitless “debate”) and/or exchanging perspectives on it - please join us on flatearthresearch to discuss it!
The most fundamental scientific reason why the earth cannot be spherical the way we are taught is that the laws of hydrostatics, which have stood largely unchanged for 3 centuries, i.e. the natural behavior of liquid water at rest do not allow it. There is SO much to discuss about this subject, and this is only one potential place to begin exploring it.