"If Elon buys Twitter, he'd own EVERY piece of intellectual property that goes with it. Including the Data Servers. What happens if Twitter's mainframe servers are located at the CIA HQ in Langley? Interwoven into those servers would be EVERY piece of intelligence from every CIA / FBI / DoD... "
(media.greatawakening.win)
📱 DEEP STATE PANIC 🖧
It would seem that Elon Musk has the Deep State by their deep balls.
NCSWIC!
u/#lightning
Interesting theory and the moab of all moabs. I hope we learn the truth.
"Military World Court"
I wonder if the BRICS Nations could set this up outside of the Rothschild/UN corrupt framework?
Good theory.
If true... no way they will give it to Elon. At some point.
The white hats would have to hold them at gun point.
No way in hell they would let this out. They would not comply even if the supreme court tells them to.
Elon is not going to get ownership if this is true.
Will this be the event that goads the DS try to flip over the chessboard?
If not this event, I can think of several others looming on the horizon.
Could be. Good thinking!
Could all the delays and court battles just be a way to delay the purchase to give them time to wipe the evidence clean? Been thinking this was a possibility. If I were "them" thats what I would be doing. Start creating a clean version for the transition. Put dead switch in place. When the day of acquisition comes pull the plug and walk away.
Agreed.. I was thinking the same thing here.
This is extremely far-fetched and very likely technically inaccurate.
Thank you. It is ridiculous, in fact.
Is it actually? Lifelog ring any bells?
The irony is that most official government systems are like 20 years behind what you find in the private sector.
Maybe the ones you know about. The good ones are always kept close to the chest.
The government has two goals with their infrastructure.
Price and Security.
Older physical systems are used because there is little to no threat of zero-day attacks, or hardware attacks.
Price ultimately comes down to contracting these days. Everything is contracted.
In the end, most systems are hosted on AWS (Amazon Web Services) these days.
CIA, DOD, and many other entities host their data on AWS.
I keep telling people that the government isn't the big evil baddie most think it is. It's incompetent and impotent, sure. It's also captive.
If these corporations were to terminate every government contract, or refuse to fulfill their end of the deal, the US would be completely destroyed in a day.
From wetwork to motherboards, the US Government operates at the behest of corporations.
Most of the military is not combat arms. Less than 1%. Of that less than 1%, less than 1% of those persons see real combat.
Comparatively, contractors see far more combat. They have better gear. They have better comms. They're paid better. Most veterans who are willing to continue in the warfare industry go to contractors. They have the brain trust, the experience, the expertise, the funding.
Congress doesn't write it's own bills, the military doesn't run it's own intel platforms, or comms platforms, or C&C platforms.
At the end of the day my 2c is that the government is heading toward disaster and will be out on the street begging the American citizen to save them from the prison they built for themselves.
If social media were running on CIA servers, I would think the CIA would transfer the applications and data to virtual servers that could be moved to any physical server around the world. Then they could separate and hide the data they want to keep secret. This is my rough assumption based on limited info.
CIA uses AWS for their server storage. At worst they would have given Twitter access to some contractor that had proprietary security, but that would be insulated from the CIA.
It's like they're both running a separate license of the same software, not hardware. The hardware is based on AWS.
They don't need to be 'running on' to be 'in bed with'. Seems more likely to me... In that case just need to disconnect/bury etc their tracks as EM's takeover gets close.
The sides involved already know it all.
This is being "fought" in public for a very specific reason.
Really really fucking doubt it. You think IC controlled data is going to come with the Twitter purchase? Never going to happen.
No, that’s not how IT works.
If Twitter is on C_A servers then C_A can read/delete Elon’s data, not the opposite.
Lol, thank you. This post is just so wrong.
Twitter uses AWS (Amazon Web Services). They used to use MySQL.
Basically, everything is on the cloud and under Amazon servers.
This post makes zero sense unless there is some other database that is not known, or needed to operate.
Nothing against the GAW OP, but whomever the OP is of this screenshot is assuredly smoking crack.
No way they would put ownership of all the servers under a single publicly traded company.
Like AWS? They do. Literally everyone does. Every corporation and government agency.
DOD, FBI, CIA, Congress, you name it.
Maybe. I don’t have any knowledge on this, but it would make more sense for Twitters traffic to run through some blackop servers wholly owned by a deep state entity than it would fit all of the shady deep state hardware (for multiple tech companies) to be sitting within Twitter.
I will toss a bone.
NSA brass revolving door leads to Amazon Board of Directors.
'Dastin AF.
Everyone traffics their data through AWS. Amazon Web Service hosts the data on their servers. You can find the government contracts regarding this from the CIA to DOD to FBI to anyone else.
Almost every major corporation does the same, and not just in America. Most western nations use AWS.
Twitter uses AWS.
You might be considering the back end software, but not the physical data storage.
I would not agree that the software is some CIA software either. It is Deep State software, however.
It's called Salesforce, Clearforce, Palantir, and whatever other name / companies are out there.
The basic premise is using AI algorithms tailored to your mission to sift data and produce results. Whether that's targeting terrorists, Americans, or tweets.
While it's the most dangerous threat to freedom we are facing, it's actually out in the open. Twitter openly works with Salesforce and allows integration.
Intelligence already collects all data directly from the ISP network switches - see Snowden AT&T leaks. They don't need Twitter's cooperation to collect anything, though I'm sure Twitter provides them a backdoor like nearly every tech company does.
More importantly, anyone that has the delusion that Musk is benevolent needs to wake up. He's a free mason that's playing his role as an opposition billionaire while he is developing the technologies that will allow the ruling class to enslave humanity - StarLink, Neuralink, Tesla cars, probably dozens of others. The guy was pictured with Maxwell, he wears a jacket that says "new world order" in Latin. His mother posed for dozens of photos with masonic symbolism. He runs in the same circles as the rest of our rulers. Musk isn't for the common man and this Q messiah nonsense is a psyop that was perfected by the communists a century ago.
If true, I'm sure Elon could not unilaterally be able to expose this truth. These bits of info would be highly classified. Even if he just says it, the MSM propaganda machine would be turned on Elon in ways similar to what Trump experienced.
Until the MSM propaganda machine is turned off our battle to awaken the Sheeple will continue as it has.
And that proves the censorship was illegal, since it was funded by taxpayers and NOT a private company
What happens to Elon's new manufacturing in China if Elon doesn't give the Chinese Communist Party what they want out of Twitter?
https://electrek.co/2022/08/01/tesla-secures-battery-material-supply-deals-chinese-companies/
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-06-23/tesla-said-readying-its-china-factory-for-even-greater-volumes
The Deep-State is laying the foundation for a declaration of national security interests to keep Twitter away from Elon Musk.
Slight tweak to OPs assertion. It's more likely that Twitter's data centers permit backdoor access to alphabet agencies. But yes, if Musk purchases Twiiter, he would own the backdoors.
He wouldn’t own that stuff; its a dark partnership
If, they were there, if, they're moving them or finding his replacement. A good indicator will be if Grimes survives, without duress.
Lol. This is unlikely but entertaining.
Twitter, unless it has its own on prem servers, probably runs on AWS or something similar.
Feds would just have easy access through them. They’re not going to be running a secret mainframe in their basement lol
This isn’t Hillary Clinton with her private illegal unsecured email server (no raids!)
Youtube, Amazon,...
Remember the Amazon shutdown in February-March 2017? If I recall correctly, that was related to the Snowden leaks.
You guys do not understand.
When old Warhawks from the Bush Cabal start talking about NATIONALIZING STARLINK what your seeing is threats and coercion.
Just like how they put Elon on the Ukraine kill list for a minute.
Point is that they USA Government under Biden will treat Musk like an enemy. Like a terrorist.
Musk has picked a fight with the current USA Government.
He did this by being a billionaire who wants to take over the town square and make it more honest and opened. To leftists that is Treasonous.
Delightful speculation.
YAY.
…which is why I still say Elon is a Spook and is buying Twitter to ‘slap and seal’ it just like the DOJ does when they want to bury the greater evil.
Time will tell…
Not true. Even if they were hosted in the same location - even in the same racks - the information would be segregated on different physical servers and firewalled
If these are the servers i think they are, then they are located somewhere in the middle of the country. There was news about the building some years ago being a massive power draw.
The serious intel network servers are not connected to the internet.
Alright so buy more dwac
Julie Green says all the social media platforms are coming down. We'll see. I hope she's right.
Wow........just.......wow !!!
That certainly could explain how Twitter could command such a high stock price with zero profit, but I don't see CIA, or any other government entity allowing a private citizen to have access to whatever they have, even if Musk technically owns it. The citizens of the U.S. own the U.S. Capital, and look what happened when the owners simply went inside to take a look :)