Trigger warning? Really? Just because instant death is more visceral than slow death by poison doesn't mean the two are different. It's good to let that kind of shock wash over you.
All this is, is dehumanization garbage that achieves nothing other than division. Not only is it untrue, but even if it were true, it benefits us preciously zero to acknowledge and is in fact a detriment to winning people back to reason.
I think ArtemisY was taking some hyperbolic licence with the “no longer technically human” part. The “artificially altering DNA” part, though, is very much still on the table.
DNA has been shown to be modified by Pfizer jabs in vitro in the now famous Swedish study.
Sure, Reuters debunked it. Nothing to do with the ex-Reuters CEO Jamie Dimon being on the Pfizer board, I’m sure, and various other nefarious connections.
Such as when the BioNTech CEO admitted on camera he hadn’t taken the jab yet, Reuters still torturously fact checked this to the point of blatant lies.
“According to Reuters fact checkers, Dr. Sahin of BioNTech did not admit that he is unjabbed. That’s right. Despite the fact you heard him say exactly that with your own ears, Reuters is claiming that you are wrong, and Sahin himself is wrong, and the BioNTech CEO is vaccinated with his own product, the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine. As per usual, the Reuters fact checking team provides precisely zero evidence to back up their wild claims. Despite this, Facebook and other social media platforms will not allow anybody to contradict what Reuters are saying about Sahin’s vaccination status.”
Thank you. I misremembered. It’s James C Smith. Wrong globalist elite scumbag James. While I hate blindly testing my memory privately then failing publicly, at least the thrust of my point wasn’t lost. But it is important to be thorough.
If it were, go ahead and spout it out as much as you want to no benefit if not detriment. Likely detriment. Notice I didn't say "not ok" or "you can't do this". The right time to tell particular truths is not always immediately when learned, unfortunately. In a perfect world it would be, but the world is not perfect.
Certain truths at the wrong time will just drive away the people you're trying to convince. You have to soften them up first with stuff that doesn't hit so hard before hitting them with the real hard shit.
To be clear, I'm talking about telling this kind of shit to other people. Hence, "and is in fact a detriment to winning people back to reason". If what is said is true, I don't give a shit if it's shared here in particular. That's why we're here.
Now while that's all well and good, none of it applies here to begin with because what he said isn't true. If it was true, I likely wouldn't have said anything as I assume it's a given that you don't lead a conversation with normies by saying "you're not a Human anymore, and therefore I'm genetically superior to you", even if true. Only mentioned it as a side note to my main point, which is that the claim is false.
Common sense. What does it mean to be human. Are people born retarded not human? Are people born outside the “average” or “normal” not human? What stupidity.
Our DNA was altered by the invaders ..clearly talked about in the Bible...a record of the fallen angels...aka elohim...translation..from the heavens...other planets ....
There is scientific evidence our DNA was altered. Also crops too...
Monsanto seem to successfully argue that golden corn is their property. Which would seem to suggest that there is a legal precedent that if you modify the DNA of a naturally occuring organism that it becomes your property. Ergo humans who got the beastly clotshots have had their DNA altered so you could argue that they are not humans they are property now. You know if it is evil enough that some of the corporations are going to try to claim it!
I get what you're saying here but God absolutely has his limits. Those who willingly take the mark are lost forever and while I don't think this specific instance was the mark of the beast, all of these people willingly took an experimental injection that may have altered their bodies in ways we don't fully understand just so they could buy and sell and engage in commerce. If this was a trial run for the mark they all failed miserably.
This is not true dammit!! People were told it was a vaccine...one of many they had been having since they were born...the only thing that could save them.
They were also told it was an experimental gene therapy, but they chose to believe the people who said that that was a conspiracy theory and to dismiss it.
No one was told it was experimental gene therapy...I have asked everyone I know who got the jab what did they think it was for and what were they told when they went for the jab....no one knew what was in the jab..I mean NHS nurses etc ..had no idea of ingredients never mind get informed consent
I think the point is that they are no longer LEGALLY fully human. Of course they are still human.
I don't know if that means that legally someone not "human" can sue for damages. Or if the damages can be greatly reduced.
12 standard deviations? If you know statistics, you would know this has to be intentional. There is no way you can get that kind of data unless it was made to happen.
Jesus fuck can we put a NSFL tag on this, I just watched a man get run over to death by a train what the hell. Others may be jaded to death but I am not, I really don't want to see shit like that.
I think those people possibly died suddenly before getting hit by the train, so technically those persons died and then got run over. 🤔
The reality is that a lot of people have been dying suddenly, and you might become apathetic to death/jaded/cynical soon if the globalist elites get their way and a good majority of the Earth’s population continues to die suddenly.
Unfortunately, I think all of us will become apathetic/cynical/jaded to some point—it’s going to be a hard pill to swallow when we start seeing all of the Covid jabbed children drop suddenly. God save the children. Hopefully this documentary will spread to and be viewed by the normies, and as a result, children will not be jabbed and be safe from harm.
Technically he didn’t get run “over” by a train. Was more run “next to” by the train. I know it’s no consolation, but was probably shredded before her reached the wheels
Well he comes off a bit like yellow journalism BUT why is it that the fricken Enquirer rag, half the time is covering things that 6 months later turn out to be true? I don't make any assumptions about Stu Peters. A lot of preposterous-sounding things are part of our current reality, it turns out.
Life is a big VR game where we cab play as a VR character within it that gets his head blown up after dying in a game inside a game. Perhaps inside of another simulation.
Please let me know when resources are needed to pull these motherfuckers off their bass in the late hours of night, when the world wakes up and officially hunts down all the criminals who benefitted from this scam. I will quit my job and give a helping hand bringing justice.
WARNING: brutal footage near the end of people collapsing and getting hit by trains.
Trigger warning? Really? Just because instant death is more visceral than slow death by poison doesn't mean the two are different. It's good to let that kind of shock wash over you.
Exactly, something needs to shake you out of it
not to mention a lot of blue and yellow color coding. no thanks.
This isn't even the worse of it. The survivors are being genetically altered. They are no longer human.
“No longer human” … That is just false.
If their DNA has been artificially altered, they are no longer technically human. It is a simple, scientific observation.
I see what you did there. Very nice.
No it isn't. This isn't how being Human works.
All this is, is dehumanization garbage that achieves nothing other than division. Not only is it untrue, but even if it were true, it benefits us preciously zero to acknowledge and is in fact a detriment to winning people back to reason.
I think ArtemisY was taking some hyperbolic licence with the “no longer technically human” part. The “artificially altering DNA” part, though, is very much still on the table.
DNA has been shown to be modified by Pfizer jabs in vitro in the now famous Swedish study.
https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73
Sure, Reuters debunked it. Nothing to do with the ex-Reuters CEO Jamie Dimon being on the Pfizer board, I’m sure, and various other nefarious connections.
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-pfizer-dna-idUSL2N2VQ2OU
Such as when the BioNTech CEO admitted on camera he hadn’t taken the jab yet, Reuters still torturously fact checked this to the point of blatant lies.
“According to Reuters fact checkers, Dr. Sahin of BioNTech did not admit that he is unjabbed. That’s right. Despite the fact you heard him say exactly that with your own ears, Reuters is claiming that you are wrong, and Sahin himself is wrong, and the BioNTech CEO is vaccinated with his own product, the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine. As per usual, the Reuters fact checking team provides precisely zero evidence to back up their wild claims. Despite this, Facebook and other social media platforms will not allow anybody to contradict what Reuters are saying about Sahin’s vaccination status.”
https://open.substack.com/pub/lionessofjudah/p/safe-and-effective-man-who-invented?r=pezuu&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
Even mainstream normie rag Spectator is touting DNA damage as a possible outcome from the Pfizer jabs on account of the weird shit in them.
https://www.spectator.com.au/2022/11/wots-in-the-shots/
Just a note: Jamie Dimon is the current CEO of JP Morgan Chase Bank and has been for over 30 years.
Thank you. I misremembered. It’s James C Smith. Wrong globalist elite scumbag James. While I hate blindly testing my memory privately then failing publicly, at least the thrust of my point wasn’t lost. But it is important to be thorough.
No worries! Jamie Dimon is a corrupt scumbag as well. Excellent point! Thank you
So the truth is only ok when it makes us feel good? Sounds like a perfect example of libtard logic to me…
Again, it's not true.
If it were, go ahead and spout it out as much as you want to no benefit if not detriment. Likely detriment. Notice I didn't say "not ok" or "you can't do this". The right time to tell particular truths is not always immediately when learned, unfortunately. In a perfect world it would be, but the world is not perfect.
Certain truths at the wrong time will just drive away the people you're trying to convince. You have to soften them up first with stuff that doesn't hit so hard before hitting them with the real hard shit.
To be clear, I'm talking about telling this kind of shit to other people. Hence, "and is in fact a detriment to winning people back to reason". If what is said is true, I don't give a shit if it's shared here in particular. That's why we're here.
Now while that's all well and good, none of it applies here to begin with because what he said isn't true. If it was true, I likely wouldn't have said anything as I assume it's a given that you don't lead a conversation with normies by saying "you're not a Human anymore, and therefore I'm genetically superior to you", even if true. Only mentioned it as a side note to my main point, which is that the claim is false.
Common sense. What does it mean to be human. Are people born retarded not human? Are people born outside the “average” or “normal” not human? What stupidity.
Homo Vaxiens?
Our DNA was altered by the invaders ..clearly talked about in the Bible...a record of the fallen angels...aka elohim...translation..from the heavens...other planets ....
There is scientific evidence our DNA was altered. Also crops too...
Since cancer is the replication of damaged DNA (iirc) then technically anyone with Cancer is no longer human?
That doesn't sound right. There must be a better definition.
GMO Human
Monsanto seem to successfully argue that golden corn is their property. Which would seem to suggest that there is a legal precedent that if you modify the DNA of a naturally occuring organism that it becomes your property. Ergo humans who got the beastly clotshots have had their DNA altered so you could argue that they are not humans they are property now. You know if it is evil enough that some of the corporations are going to try to claim it!
Good they can come pick their corn our of our turds.
No weapon formed against the shall prosper.
Amen
I get what you're saying here but God absolutely has his limits. Those who willingly take the mark are lost forever and while I don't think this specific instance was the mark of the beast, all of these people willingly took an experimental injection that may have altered their bodies in ways we don't fully understand just so they could buy and sell and engage in commerce. If this was a trial run for the mark they all failed miserably.
God has no limits.
"God absolutely has limits"
Yup, he is limited to YOUR believing.
So if you say He can't help you you are right. You are also right if you say he can.
"but if you believe, ALL things are possible to he that believes."
You gotta believe God's promises to receive them. You reject them out right so for you they will not come to pass.
Recommedation, study the Word sp you can build your believing. Il tell you right now God CAN and will do everything He promises IF you believe.
This is not true dammit!! People were told it was a vaccine...one of many they had been having since they were born...the only thing that could save them.
They were also told it was an experimental gene therapy, but they chose to believe the people who said that that was a conspiracy theory and to dismiss it.
No one was told it was experimental gene therapy...I have asked everyone I know who got the jab what did they think it was for and what were they told when they went for the jab....no one knew what was in the jab..I mean NHS nurses etc ..had no idea of ingredients never mind get informed consent
I think the point is that they are no longer LEGALLY fully human. Of course they are still human. I don't know if that means that legally someone not "human" can sue for damages. Or if the damages can be greatly reduced.
12 standard deviations? If you know statistics, you would know this has to be intentional. There is no way you can get that kind of data unless it was made to happen.
When losing your audience can't be fixed in editing.
Dear God, help us! Here’s another: Soaring Cases of Sudden Death - The Only Smoking Gun is the Jab
Dr Peter McCullough is such a hero!
I wonder if a trailer like this could be shown on Elons Twitter.
Try
I posted it on twitter. Hope it gets seen.
Jesus fuck can we put a NSFL tag on this, I just watched a man get run over to death by a train what the hell. Others may be jaded to death but I am not, I really don't want to see shit like that.
I think those people possibly died suddenly before getting hit by the train, so technically those persons died and then got run over. 🤔
The reality is that a lot of people have been dying suddenly, and you might become apathetic to death/jaded/cynical soon if the globalist elites get their way and a good majority of the Earth’s population continues to die suddenly.
Unfortunately, I think all of us will become apathetic/cynical/jaded to some point—it’s going to be a hard pill to swallow when we start seeing all of the Covid jabbed children drop suddenly. God save the children. Hopefully this documentary will spread to and be viewed by the normies, and as a result, children will not be jabbed and be safe from harm.
I'm assuming you don't know what jaded means?
Technically he didn’t get run “over” by a train. Was more run “next to” by the train. I know it’s no consolation, but was probably shredded before her reached the wheels
Someone has obviously never been on Reddit.
Underrated comment.
Oh my goodness! 🫢😨
Is this by the same people who made the snake venom Watch The Water documentary?
How has that aged and were there any mistakes to learn from?
I believe the shots are to kill us, but to me Stew Peters seems shady af.
Well he comes off a bit like yellow journalism BUT why is it that the fricken Enquirer rag, half the time is covering things that 6 months later turn out to be true? I don't make any assumptions about Stu Peters. A lot of preposterous-sounding things are part of our current reality, it turns out.
Watch the Water…. The only water I’m watching right now is Kari LAKE!
But why did Trump to tell us to take the vaccine?
Just a guess: those things on the blue glove are parasites pulled out of a vaxxed body, correct?
They are blood clots that are not composed of blood. They are more synthetic and tougher than real blood clots and are composed of the graphene oxide.
Some kids had to undergo leg amputations because of these.
So sad!
Some live patients were lucky enough to get them removed surgically before they caused death or necrosis.
When you're 2 years ahead on this info, these documentaries are old news.
Backup Video Link:
https://files.catbox.moe/mpev2x.mp4
May God have mercy on us all. 🙏
Life is a big VR game where we cab play as a VR character within it that gets his head blown up after dying in a game inside a game. Perhaps inside of another simulation.
Ugh. So terrible. People are just so blind to realize.
Please let me know when resources are needed to pull these motherfuckers off their bass in the late hours of night, when the world wakes up and officially hunts down all the criminals who benefitted from this scam. I will quit my job and give a helping hand bringing justice.