Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

245
Why Is The U.S. So Openly Advertising A Ship Carrying Tanks To Ukraine? Can anyone sense a False Flag? (mobile.twitter.com) 🏳️ FALSE FLAG 👮
posted 3 years ago by Sadness 3 years ago by Sadness +245 / -0
71 comments share
71 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (71)
sorted by:
▲ 22 ▼
– ObviousStatementMan 22 points 3 years ago +22 / -0

The Lusitania Part II - Watch the Water

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– LongTimeListener 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Remember the Maine!!

Lusitania

Gulf of Tonkin

USS Cole

Tried and true deep state method to trick the Patriotic masses onto the war path.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– ObviousStatementMan 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Aquatic FF's = No witnesses.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– deleted 19 points 3 years ago +19 / -0
▲ 26 ▼
– Sadness [S] 26 points 3 years ago +26 / -0

Yes, but what is to stop a smooth DS operator to blow up the ship, and CLAIM it was the Russians à la Nordstream? There won't be an investigation, just some hotheads yelling Ruski murder.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– deleted 15 points 3 years ago +15 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Sadness [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

This is why I think it is implausible that Russia will blow that ship out of the water, and if it does blow up it is the DS. The Russians just have to wait until the vehicles show up at the front line, where they have all their guns, rockets and planes ready and waiting. Why waste effort on an Atlantic operation?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– fazzman23 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

right, we know the CIA has subs....

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SoMuchWinning45 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

It would take a long time to train them to operate a tank.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Sadness [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

And prolly, the tanks will be operated by Westerners, sheepdipped to look like Ukrainians. The problem with that tactic, is that they won't be able to admit it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 8 ▼
– kish-kumen 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

Normies: they want the Ruskies to know, and be afraid of what it means.

Cabal: they want Normies to be afraid of what it means.

White hats: they want the cabal to know, that we know, that they want everyone to be afraid of what it means.

Patriots: it means, let's go already

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– solarsavior 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Anons: it means we need to make more popcorn

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TheGreatPumpkin 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Moar 🍿

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– kish-kumen 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Ha!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Plebbitimmigrant 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Hope the crew was smart enough to demand Hazard Pay

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– VonErich 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

the lusitania - the titanic - the maine (spanish-american war) - all FF's to facilitate yet another war

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– LongTimeListener 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

USS Cole, USS Maddox of Gulf of Tonkin fame

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Sadness [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

My point exactly.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– solarsavior 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Watch the water. Playbook is known.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– GodBlessAmerica58 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

FF is a posability, or they are just trying to egg Russia on. They probably sent at least some defectives like they did with the Patriot Missiles as well.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Sadness [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Yes, I had not considered that- of course. When they are making a big Hollywood song and dance about sending the vehicles, they are probably just props.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Rotor 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

So the Russians can take it out and “draw’ us into direct conflict. That’s a big duh!

Biden will cover up Ukraine by destroying Ukraine and us as well if need be.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Mr_A 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

"Russians"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Sadness [S] 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

zigackly.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– LongTimeListener 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Their goal is the destruction of the United States of America. The pedo death cult can not win without this. They will do so by making the American People distrust every institution through biological warfare, through kinetic warfare, through financial warfare, through psychological warfare, through internecine warfare, through race warfare, through class warfare. Their lies and subterfuge are all designed to send the biggest threat against them into chaos.

It is through this chaos, when the People are begging for relief, they will provide their "solutions".

But we know their playbook. "Never let a crises go to waste."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– CHEFF10BRS 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

( CAN SOMEONE TELL ME THIS ??? ) - Exactly "What Port" ? in exactly "What Country" are US Military Cargo Ships going to pull up to , to drop off all these tanks and military equipment ??? ( Plus US Service Men ) I looked at a world map, and i can not see one logical tactically safe place to unload that bulk of equipment. ( and personnel. ) NEXT - the closest "Open Ocean" port is either Northern Germany , or Turkey in the Mediterranean. THEN - it would be a 1500 mile journey from Germany ( through mountainous terrain ) or a 1000 mile journey from Turkey ( through mountainous terrain ) just to get to the very western / or , southern side of the Ukraine. " THAT SHIT AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN". LASTLY - ??? What happened to that "The MILITARY is the Only Way" rhetoric ??? I'm kinda questioning weather or not ??? if the US Military is gonna be available to have the back of the US Citizen - to raise the middle finger to the Cabal / Black Hats / NWO - when they are busy over in Eastern Europe shuffling boat loads of all that was mentioned above. ??? Am I Missing Something ???

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– DeathRayDesigner 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

I don't follow. Any ship can unload at Gdansk in Poland, and the tanks can go by railway to Ukraine. No mountains involved, as far as I know.

I wouldn't put it past the Russians to delegate an attack sub to tail the cargo ship and see if anyone else is also tagging. If there is an "allied" submarine (U.S. or U.K.) that torpedoes the ship for a False Flag attack, it would be a super consternation if the unsuspected Russian follower were to torpedo the assailant submarine. What would the assailant say? Couldn't say a word. Wasn't supposed to be there.

Or the Russian sub could go on active sonar all the while, announcing to everyone that it was there---and obtaining a solid track on any other follower. (I would also suspect that the U.S. Navy would detail a destroyer to follow the ship, if only to "verify" the False Flag and provide aid and assistance to a stricken ship. Tidy scripting.)

And, just gaming this in my head, the Russians should send along a surface ship to be an "impartial observer" of whatever happened. Capturing any sonar tracks by the way. Better yet, the Russian ship could conduct an anti-submarine attack on the assailant. How could any U.S. trailing ship object?

I think the best way to spoil a False Flag event is to add extra actors on stage, wearing brass knuckles, turn up the lights, and fill the auditorium with spectators and cameras.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– propertyofUniverse 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

I like your thinking here. I'm sure the Russians have gamed it through. They are likely to have more options than the west in some ways. It's their home area, they have good surveillance and electronic countermeasures. They have quiet subs and better missiles. Finally, I think they have better (sane) strategists.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– CHEFF10BRS 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Im no scholar when it comes to geography ( especially Europe ) but i don't see a path / open ocean route - that "Gigantic US Cargo Ships" can get any farther East - via shipping routs , than Germany. There is no access or major port in Poland ( as far as i can tell. ) The Baltic Sea - " Is Cut Off" and there is no access to Northern Poland.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– CoViDfRaUd2020 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

The Baltic Sea exits through the Denmark Straits into the North Sea,.Poland has a Port at Gdansk,.where the Tanks can be railroaded through Poland to Ukraine

three largest ports in Poland - Gdańsk, Gdynia, and Świnoujście

-which is most like the Route that the US Cargo ship with the Tanks will take,.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DeathRayDesigner 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Are we looking at the same map? From Wikipedia: "Seaports exist all along Poland's Baltic coast, with most freight operations using Świnoujście, Police, Szczecin, Kołobrzeg, Gdynia, Gdańsk and Elbląg as their base. The Port of Gdańsk is the only port in the Baltic Sea adapted to receive oceanic vessels." If you can get into the Baltic to ship goods to Germany, going a little farther to Poland is no problem at all. Why would they send cargo in a ship that could not make passage? That makes no sense.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CHEFF10BRS 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

" Makes no Sense" - ( your last statement. ) Once again - I asked ??? What " O P E N OCEAN P O R T " - not some land locked "SEA PORT" that ships have to navigate a rat maze for access into - and be left "VULNERABLE" and trapped in a box with no possible route for quick escape - in fear of attack. Secondly - all that US Military cargo has to be protected and transferred - via rail - for many many miles , on rail lines , and rail equipment that "ARE NOT DESIGNED" to transport massive US Military equipment. ??? What quantity of US Military "Equipment & Personnel" would be required for such an operation ??? and once again - ( Trust in the US Military / The Military is the only way ) This would mean that our military is in direct correlational in creating world tension and posturing in an act of aggression and act's of WAR directly squarely at Russia.
" ALL THIS" makes me contemplate and question "ALL" that is going on around us.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DeathRayDesigner 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

What are you talking about? Gdansk is a main seaport on the Baltic Sea, which is not a constrained passage. There is no "rat maze." If you are willing to accept sea transport to Germany, there is nothing else to worry about when traveling a few more miles to Gdansk (the former German Danzig). After that, conventional rail transport is more than adequate to convey military equipment. I don't understand your capitalization and exclamation points. Consult a map, for heaven's sake.

As for "vulnerable," there is no other word for cargo ships, which has been a known fact for hundreds of years. There is no such thing as "quick escape," as cargo ships are not "quick."

How old are you? I guess you have no idea how much military materiel and personnel were transported exclusively by ship in World War II. Often as closely as possible to where combat was taking place. No railroads across the Atlantic Ocean to North Africa. No railroads to Sicily and mainland Italy. No railroads across the Mediterranean Sea, Red Sea, Persian Gulf, or Indian Ocean. No railroads to the beaches at Normandy. No railroads to Brussels, after the beachhead was established. Not to mention no railroads across the Pacific Ocean. My father was in the Navy Armed Guard manning the convoys, all through the war. They went everywhere. What you are talking about would be dismissed as nonsense.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BumbleHill 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

lol, what? Why do you think there are 10k US troops around the port in Gdansk? It's the largest port in the area and one Putin would LOVE to own. They ship 50 TRILLION tons of crap every year. We also drop tons of stuff into huge German ports and rail it into Ukraine very easily.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CHEFF10BRS 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Responding to your " L O L " - Once again - I asked ??? What " O P E N OCEAN P O R T " - not some land locked "SEA PORT" that ships have to navigate a rat maze for access into - and be left "VULNERABLE" and trapped in a box with no possible route for quick escape - in fear of attack. Secondly - all that US Military cargo has to be protected and transferred - via rail - for many many miles , on rail lines , and rail equipment that "ARE NOT DESIGNED" to transport massive US Military equipment. ??? What quantity of US Military "Equipment & Personnel" would be required for such an operation ??? and once again - ( Trust in the US Military / The Military is the only way ) This would mean that our military is in direct correlational in creating world tension and posturing in an act of aggression and act's of WAR directly squarely at Russia. " ALL THIS" makes me contemplate and question "ALL" that is going on around us.

permalink report delete edit reply

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BumbleHill 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

are you ok?

You do realize that "some land locked sea port" is actually the deepest water port in the area and way deeper than anything else on the open ocean side of the EU.

You clearly know nothing about shipping or the military.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CHEFF10BRS 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

You are 100% correct. ( i am clueless. ) That is the entire premise of my response to this post. ( I was asking ??? ) On my IGNORANT side of the street - your response seems to justify my question. Germany seems to be the only viable option. ??? Why would our military engage in such actions . ( and vulnerabilities ? )

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BumbleHill 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

No, they landed in Gdansk already and used railcars to get them to the Ukraine border. This is very, very normal and happened all through WW1 and WW2.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Sadness [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

The most convenient port would be Odessa, except that I doubt that Erdogan would let that ship through the Dardanelles. So yeah, there is the issue of transport overland (and mountain ranges, on transporters), which makes the convoy a flaming target - not comfy. Furthermore, there is the FF issue, to provide NATO with a reason to put official boots on the ground.

I believe this 'moving' military vehicles thingie is too visible - everyone is now looking. What are they really doing? As another anon just pointed out: Why move them from USA when those vehicles are all over Europe? But then many of the European tanks/APCs are in a shocking state of disrepair - and supplying those to Ukraine would mean depleting stocks in the rest of Europe, only to have them blown up in the first week. The donor countries then would be 'defenseless against Russian aggression' even though they already were defenseless with that rotting equipment, and Russia does not intend anything of the sort.

Why is the US military not putting its foot down, with this nonsense of foreign entanglements? In the end, what they are doing is covering Biden's ass, who was meddling with large amounts of money in Ukraine. Why is the military putting up with it?

It's a head scratcher all right.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– HighCountryAZ 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

I'd like to know what exactly makes expired-uranium exterior construction a desirable feature on an Abrams tank

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– deleted 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– papagiorgio-g 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

It's a very dense material. Hard to penetrate. It's also layered with ceramic layers to defeat HEAT rounds.

Search Chobham armor.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– LongTimeListener 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I thought they werent going to send Abrams with the depleted uranium armor and all the latest bells and whistles. Ive read that they were building "stock" Abrams from scratch specifically for shipment to Ukraine.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– farpointpatriot 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

That is correct. They will not be sending tanks with the same kind of armor. Probably solid steel.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– CQVFEFE 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

DeSantis needs a haircut here

Oh wait

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– SoMuchWinning45 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

False flag to claim someone sank it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Sadness [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Someone

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– CoViDfRaUd2020 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

" it almost seems to me as if theyre inviting Russia to sink it ,I mean they showing the number af IFVs,.the name of the ship,even showing them onboard not being really Secretive about it , very strange,...btw it wouldnt be much of a problem for Russia to sink it,.but highly unlikely,.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– photobuf 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Wouldn't you love to be a sacrificial sailor on that boat?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Sadness [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I dunno, maybe they have an orchestra on board, to play while it goes down? Heroic stuff.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– HumblePede 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Holy cow! OPSEC much?!

There is no excuse for this. None. It has to be deliberate.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– FullDisQlosure 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Wasn’t there a Russian air craft carrier that went off course straight towards the US recently

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Sadness [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Yes, but notice that no-one knows where that nuclear Russian sub is.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Lyonessrising 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Scare event has to start somehow.
You sank my battleship!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TheGreatPumpkin 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

They have to cover their asses somehow and Russia knows way too much.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Sadness [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Seems a weird way to cover their asses - by openly advertising the name of the ship and showing its trajectory etc.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TheGreatPumpkin 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

It’s simple. Bomb the ship and claim Russia did it. Be sloppy and claim plausible deniability. Anything to shut Putin up because he knows too much.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– drakus 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Well, in fairness, Demtard leaders routinely tip our defensive hands to our adveraries. Black Jesus routinely did so.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BumbleHill 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

This person doesn't really understand what Osint is.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Fringe--dweller PRO 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

It is calling into the UK next week, before heading over to mainland Europe.

Probably fitting the detonators and remote triggers.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– xbonesny 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Why would the us send tanks via ship when we already have them in the European Theater?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SoMuchWinning45 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Someone on here mentioned that there's tech we need to remove before sending them to anybody, specifically the depleted uranium armor.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Sadness [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Those are not tanks, just saying.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy