Bingo! Been saying it for years. Asking the question, actually. Why are they dumbing kids down? Well, if the last three years haven't answered that question for you, you're a dumbed down idiot yourself. This was EXACTLY their plan. Dumb people down so much they can't possibly grasp the concept of numbers not adding up. I clearly remember them saying math was subjective, and if a student thought 1+1=3, well, that's the correct number for that student. Well, here we are. We have a generation of adults who don't understand how 81 million votes is impossible if the other candidate got 76 million votes.
This election saw the highest turnout of any federal general election recorded by EAVS to date with 67.7% of the citizen voting age population casting ballots that were counted.
More than 209 million people were active registered voters for the 2020 general election and more than 161 million voters cast ballots that were counted for this election.
Check the previous 3 presidential election got counts. Narrow margin in total votes. Averaged 128,500,000 those 3 years less the 81,000,000 votes Trump received, Biden received the difference. How much is that? 49,500,000
In other words they cheated harder after their miscalculation of the "Anybody but Hillary crowd" as well as Trump's appeal to those who actually heard what he said. After watching him live up to the words in just about every possible way, it is inconceivable to me that he could lose unless they cheated harder. They cheat every single time. To what degree is the only thing that changes. If we have an election in 2024 at all, they will have to cheat all the way from 2022 through January 21, 2025. It sure appears they are going to try to do just that. Inquiring minds watch with great interest. I hope the movie(s) end happily for us. I trust in my creator and myself. My country is floundering on a heavy sea in a craft taking on water at a startling pace. The world as I have known it hangs in the balance.
I think if Dems didn’t fight to the bitter end to block voter ID the argument that correlation is not causation is valid. But, when you have multiple points of correlation like no voter ID, refusing to release voter registration data, etc. the plausibility they are using illegal immigration as part of election rigging is plausible.
Do you think people can receive Government assistance without identification? Or file their tax refunds to receive tax credits without identification? I think it is virtually impossible to exist in society without identification. And, if poor people somehow do struggle to get ID why in the world would it not be part of poverty relief to provide them with identification?
So, to answer your question no, I think the vast majority have identification, but the myth is perpetuated that they do not because it is a necessary part in rigging elections. It has been for a very long time.
Hargie Randall, 72, was born in his family’s home in Huntsville, Tex., and
has lived in the state his entire life. Randall, now living in Houston’s low-income Fifth Ward neighborhood, has several health problems and such poor eyesight that he is legally blind. He can’t drive and has to ask others for rides.
After Texas implemented its new law, Randall went to the Department of Public Safety (the Texas agency that handles driver’s licenses and identification cards) three times to try to get a photo ID to vote. Each time Randall was told he needed different items. First, he was told he needed three forms of identification. He came back and brought his Medicaid card, bills and a current voter registration card from voting in past elections.
So how to fix? If they just shut everything down and add however many votes they need to win, with media and legal system saying nyah nyah, is it even possible for the will of the people to elect their choice?
We have really taken to our conditioning. Delayed gratification to achieve a larger goal and a bigger prize just isnt in our programming any longer. I want that 15 cents right now, Im not waiting 2 years for 100 million dollars.
This. If white hats prevented the steal in 2016…. And then took control for the past 7 years, dismantling deep state cabal power, launching the space force… etc. Imagine how easy they can stop the steal in 2024!
If the election is stolen again it’s because white hats are allowing it in order to push people to the precipice. At the rate things are going I expect WHs to allow it to be stolen again.
I asked my husband this morning just how many millions of votes they had to fabricate to steal the 2020 election. Trump draws crowds of 50k plus to his rallies even now, Biden had empty circles and hid in the basement before the election. I bet it was a monumental feat of fudging away our freedom.
Well they literally had the hut the count down in the dead of night to print more ballots, extended election day into election week and a half on a few states and then banned you from social media when trying to question any of it!
39 mil for Potato Joe just about makes sense. A lot of Bernie bros got screwed (again) in the primary by the DNC. A big number of them likely sat it out. Shrillary would tick enough boxes for them to vote for her, but getting Gropey Joe as the nom would have been like us getting Jeb or Romney.
The only real voting bloc for Gropey would be hardcore dems who vote in every election, plus the firm dem base who wanted Trump out no matter what. Gropey was underperforming even Shrillary among minority voters says a lot too. Blacks (especially) and Hispanics are a big part of the dem base. Dems have long lost working class white union voters. There wasn't a huge war or recession, no real reason for the normies to want Trump gone.
Add to it that Potato Joe is just about the worst candidate the dems ever put up. Obvious mental capacity issues, but he was never that exciting in his prime. Especially with indies and moderates. I could see if the Dems put up RFK or Bernie, it would have been different.
So yeah, 39 mil would just about make sense when you take everything into context.
Truth user got the number wrong. 66.8% is the percentage of the population that voted, not the percentage of registered voters that voted. 168 million reported as registered in 2020. 155 million vote total for Trump and Biden. That would be 92% voter turnout, which is absurdly high and shady AF.
I think your right. The rigging was based on using the votes of anyone eligible to vote whether they were registered or not.
Saying 91.7% of registered voters turned out is highly implausible, but 66.8% of eligible voters turn out sounds more plausible.
More than 209 million people were active registered voters for the 2020 general election and more than 161 million voters cast ballots that were counted for this election.
According to this, the turnout would be roughly 77%. That's still a very high and suspicious turnout number. Considering past elections the turnout was in the 50-60% range.
I think this is misunderstanding that federal figure as being percentage of registered voters, when it seems to actually be percentage of citizens 18 and older.
The 2020 presidential election had the highest voter turnout of the 21st century, with 66.8% of citizens 18 years and older voting in the election
I think your right on point. The rigging was based on using the votes of anyone eligible to vote whether they were registered or not.
Saying 91.7% of registered voters turned out is hard to believe, but 66.8% of eligible voters turn out sounds more plausible.
Calculating this as a percentage of registered voters is not accurate because many people register on election day and would not be included in that count. For example, large percentages of 18, 19, and 20-year-olds who voted for the first time.
My understanding is this data is based on the Census Bureau asking people if they voted and if they were registered to vote. That would capture day of registration.
These data come from the 2020 Current Population Survey Voting and Registration Supplement for the November 2020 presidential election, which surveyed the civilian noninstitutionalized population in the United States.
Citizen population 18+ was 231k. This times 66.8 (the real official turnout number) produces around 155 million. The math is sound and this post is stupid.
As long as I have voted the numbers never seem to match up after an election. But until now no president has ever questioned it, because they are a part of it. That is why we need Trump in 2024. Scorched earth cleaning of the deep swamp!
So when are the mass arrests going to happen? How many people are involved? 10,000 people? Poll workers, ballot handlers, councilmen ignoring basic math, politicians turning the eye, state and federal prosecutors, news outlets and the list goes on. Is it really in the 100,000 of thousands that should go to the gitmo? This level of corruption is beyond imagination. How many people go along to get along. Were they afraid to stand up and lose their livelihood. Now they can wonder if their financial gains is worth their life in prison or execution.
A large part of my job is research and analysis, including statistical research. Now, please take my words with a pinch of salt as there are people far more experienced in performing statistical analysis on elections than I. My analysis projects are typically not focused on election data.
However, my work was the result of many hours of analyzing numerous data points and I was able to get a couple of apolitical & educated analysts to look over my work and verify that my methodology was sound.
As best I can tell, the only states that President Trump might have lost are:
Hawaii
Vermont
New York
Massachusetts
Rhode Island
Maryland
That's it. He won every other state and the vast majority he won comfortably. He even won California. Not by a blowout, but he won it.
As to the states I listed that President Trump might have lost, New York & Rhode Island are really close. Close enough that he might have actually won them.
Hawaii, Vermont, Mass & Maryland were close but a slight edge to Mashed Potato Brains.
This was a popular vote blowout that exceeded even the 1984 election.
Not sure what you want me to take from this, TPSM?
Although as an aside, I did use that link for some of the data in my analysis, specifically the majority of Americans supposedly voting by mail instead of in person.
Official turnout numbers were reported as 66.8% of citizens, which is around 155 million. This post seems to be taking 69% (a number I cannot find on any official counts) of the number of registered voters, 168 million, which gets to the 115 million count.
So this person is an idiot or trying to mislead you intentionally.
The guy definitely makes an erroneous calculation, one that President Trump and his team would easily catch. So why retruth it? Is it because the Census Bureau data is claiming 91.7% of registered voters turned out? That doesn’t seem plausible at all, and the only turnout percentage that matters is registered voters.
Caught these two statements in the Crnsus Bureau report:
Despite COVID-19 concerns, 155 million people turned out for the 2020 presidential election. However, 4% (552,500) of registered nonvoters reported not voting due to their concerns about the COVID-19 pandemic.
The most common reason for not voting among registered nonvoters was they were not interested in the election (17.6%). Other reasons included not liking the candidates or campaign issues, being too busy and forgetting to vote.
This means at least 21.6% of registered voters did not vote. I say at least because we are not given a value for the other reasons listed in the second statement. So 78.4% or 131,955 million registered voters voted. Deducting President Trump’s 74 million leaves Biden with 57,955 million registered voters.
So the OP on Truth is wrong in the numbers he used, but if we dig deeper into the Census Bureau report, it still supports the conclusion Joe Biden did not receive 81 million registered, legal votes. He received roughly 58 million.
This is why their educational agenda includes dumbing down in mathematics as much as possible.
Idiocracy
Bingo! Been saying it for years. Asking the question, actually. Why are they dumbing kids down? Well, if the last three years haven't answered that question for you, you're a dumbed down idiot yourself. This was EXACTLY their plan. Dumb people down so much they can't possibly grasp the concept of numbers not adding up. I clearly remember them saying math was subjective, and if a student thought 1+1=3, well, that's the correct number for that student. Well, here we are. We have a generation of adults who don't understand how 81 million votes is impossible if the other candidate got 76 million votes.
With what math did you confirm the 115 million value?
You know, I didn't confirm anything, but I will now. I'm glad you asked!
The US Census reported 168,300,000 registered voters in 2020. If you take 69% of those registered voters, you get 116,000,000 votes.
69% of registered voters or 69% of eligible voters turned out?
Only registered voters are allowed to vote (at least legally vote).
And voter turnout uses eligibility (by age, NOT registration) to calculate percentage.
The US Election Commission has these numbers
209 million registered 161 million votes.
https://www.eac.gov/news/2021/08/16/us-election-assistance-commission-releases-2020-election-administration-and-voting
Check the previous 3 presidential election got counts. Narrow margin in total votes. Averaged 128,500,000 those 3 years less the 81,000,000 votes Trump received, Biden received the difference. How much is that? 49,500,000
So.. making an estimated guess based on values you accepted previously to come up with a value to replace the one you now don't accept?
Math is hard. -Barbi
Only the Lord knows how many of our elections have been fraudulent.😤
All of them
That was my guess too.
No, just the ones where there was a risk of someone anti-swamp winning
Truth! Using the same data there is no way the 2016 totals are correct either.
https://www.eac.gov/news/2021/08/16/us-election-assistance-commission-releases-2020-election-administration-and-voting
Trump winning was the only thing that made the think MAYBE the elections aren’t bullshit.
You have to prepare fraud in advance if you want to make it look believable.
They misjudged just how popular Trump would be, so they didn't prepare enough fraud in 2016.
Same thing in 2020, but this time they didn't care about making it believable
In other words they cheated harder after their miscalculation of the "Anybody but Hillary crowd" as well as Trump's appeal to those who actually heard what he said. After watching him live up to the words in just about every possible way, it is inconceivable to me that he could lose unless they cheated harder. They cheat every single time. To what degree is the only thing that changes. If we have an election in 2024 at all, they will have to cheat all the way from 2022 through January 21, 2025. It sure appears they are going to try to do just that. Inquiring minds watch with great interest. I hope the movie(s) end happily for us. I trust in my creator and myself. My country is floundering on a heavy sea in a craft taking on water at a startling pace. The world as I have known it hangs in the balance.
I'm upping my prediction for 2024. Biden gets 1 billion votes.
What I want to see: Biden found guilty of treason, disqualified from the race entirely. Retroactively removed from both 2020 and 2024.
if they can expunge the false impeachments, they can expunge a false candidate / foreign dignitary resident
After he and hunter use that pound and half of cocaine that was found at the white house.
u/#q2479
That meme. Illegal immigrants flock to large urban areas, and large urban areas vote democrat. Can't those two facts coexist without being connected?
I think if Dems didn’t fight to the bitter end to block voter ID the argument that correlation is not causation is valid. But, when you have multiple points of correlation like no voter ID, refusing to release voter registration data, etc. the plausibility they are using illegal immigration as part of election rigging is plausible.
2000 Mules, Mike Lindell, Sidney Powell revealed to us, they did all of the above.
Would you agree that poor people are less likely to have voter id and poor people tend to vote democrat?
Do you think people can receive Government assistance without identification? Or file their tax refunds to receive tax credits without identification? I think it is virtually impossible to exist in society without identification. And, if poor people somehow do struggle to get ID why in the world would it not be part of poverty relief to provide them with identification?
So, to answer your question no, I think the vast majority have identification, but the myth is perpetuated that they do not because it is a necessary part in rigging elections. It has been for a very long time.
Well, apparently you can get assistance without,
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/getting-a-photo-id-so-you-can-vote-is-easy-unless-youre-poor-black-latino-or-elderly/2016/05/23/8d5474ec-20f0-11e6-8690-f14ca9de2972_story.html
Flock? Or lured?
Lured because otherwise they would... move to rural areas?
why is front door capitalised like it's an agency or organisation??
Ahhhhh, the blue blister map. I live in one of those and I think it is about to burst.
They don’t need illegals to vote. They just need the voter registrations to grow so they can print more fraudulent ballots at 3am.
Only Abrams sisters can handle that kind of loads
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 that's funny
Stacey can hold thousands between her front teeth alone.
In the 2008 DNC Primary, FJB DROPPED OUT after receiving less than 1% support in Iowa.
https://www.politico.com/story/2008/01/dodd-biden-drop-out-after-iowa-defeat-007705
FJB got less than 20 Million legit votes in 2020.
So how to fix? If they just shut everything down and add however many votes they need to win, with media and legal system saying nyah nyah, is it even possible for the will of the people to elect their choice?
It seems like post 2479 is saying the proof exists. So the question is why the delay in revealing it?
Why jail just the grunts?
It takes time to trace out and quietly force out the heads of the operation.
We have really taken to our conditioning. Delayed gratification to achieve a larger goal and a bigger prize just isnt in our programming any longer. I want that 15 cents right now, Im not waiting 2 years for 100 million dollars.
I think anyone with s brain should know 2020 was stolen, my fear is what's gonna stop it from happening again.
Same thing that did in 2016.
This. If white hats prevented the steal in 2016…. And then took control for the past 7 years, dismantling deep state cabal power, launching the space force… etc. Imagine how easy they can stop the steal in 2024!
If the election is stolen again it’s because white hats are allowing it in order to push people to the precipice. At the rate things are going I expect WHs to allow it to be stolen again.
I asked my husband this morning just how many millions of votes they had to fabricate to steal the 2020 election. Trump draws crowds of 50k plus to his rallies even now, Biden had empty circles and hid in the basement before the election. I bet it was a monumental feat of fudging away our freedom.
Well they literally had the hut the count down in the dead of night to print more ballots, extended election day into election week and a half on a few states and then banned you from social media when trying to question any of it!
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/110654364794580875
https://truthsocial.com/@Bill_Looman/110646369411292891
39 mil for Potato Joe just about makes sense. A lot of Bernie bros got screwed (again) in the primary by the DNC. A big number of them likely sat it out. Shrillary would tick enough boxes for them to vote for her, but getting Gropey Joe as the nom would have been like us getting Jeb or Romney.
The only real voting bloc for Gropey would be hardcore dems who vote in every election, plus the firm dem base who wanted Trump out no matter what. Gropey was underperforming even Shrillary among minority voters says a lot too. Blacks (especially) and Hispanics are a big part of the dem base. Dems have long lost working class white union voters. There wasn't a huge war or recession, no real reason for the normies to want Trump gone.
Add to it that Potato Joe is just about the worst candidate the dems ever put up. Obvious mental capacity issues, but he was never that exciting in his prime. Especially with indies and moderates. I could see if the Dems put up RFK or Bernie, it would have been different.
So yeah, 39 mil would just about make sense when you take everything into context.
lol "Gropey" - from the movie Snow White and the Seven Groomers
Truth user got the number wrong. 66.8% is the percentage of the population that voted, not the percentage of registered voters that voted. 168 million reported as registered in 2020. 155 million vote total for Trump and Biden. That would be 92% voter turnout, which is absurdly high and shady AF.
I think your right. The rigging was based on using the votes of anyone eligible to vote whether they were registered or not. Saying 91.7% of registered voters turned out is highly implausible, but 66.8% of eligible voters turn out sounds more plausible.
https://www.eac.gov/news/2021/08/16/us-election-assistance-commission-releases-2020-election-administration-and-voting
Thanks for sharing this data.
According to this, the turnout would be roughly 77%. That's still a very high and suspicious turnout number. Considering past elections the turnout was in the 50-60% range.
Not all who voted fall into the registered group, and some millions registered day-of or did not report registration status.
I think this is misunderstanding that federal figure as being percentage of registered voters, when it seems to actually be percentage of citizens 18 and older.
https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2021/2020-presidential-election-voting-and-registration-tables-now-available.html
I think your right on point. The rigging was based on using the votes of anyone eligible to vote whether they were registered or not.
Saying 91.7% of registered voters turned out is hard to believe, but 66.8% of eligible voters turn out sounds more plausible.
Calculating this as a percentage of registered voters is not accurate because many people register on election day and would not be included in that count. For example, large percentages of 18, 19, and 20-year-olds who voted for the first time.
My understanding is this data is based on the Census Bureau asking people if they voted and if they were registered to vote. That would capture day of registration.
https://www.eac.gov/news/2021/08/16/us-election-assistance-commission-releases-2020-election-administration-and-voting
Citizen population 18+ was 231k. This times 66.8 (the real official turnout number) produces around 155 million. The math is sound and this post is stupid.
https://www.eac.gov/news/2021/08/16/us-election-assistance-commission-releases-2020-election-administration-and-voting
math is racist tho so, nvm
That’s assuming that Trumps true total was 81 million… they suppressed his vote and flipped a ton as well.
As long as I have voted the numbers never seem to match up after an election. But until now no president has ever questioned it, because they are a part of it. That is why we need Trump in 2024. Scorched earth cleaning of the deep swamp!
I think that’s because because women’s voter are only counted as 70% of a vote. Checkmate conspiracy theorists!
And... We knew this three years ago.
So when are the mass arrests going to happen? How many people are involved? 10,000 people? Poll workers, ballot handlers, councilmen ignoring basic math, politicians turning the eye, state and federal prosecutors, news outlets and the list goes on. Is it really in the 100,000 of thousands that should go to the gitmo? This level of corruption is beyond imagination. How many people go along to get along. Were they afraid to stand up and lose their livelihood. Now they can wonder if their financial gains is worth their life in prison or execution.
Caught the swamp. I caught them ALL. Add the medical field to it, Governors, judges, police, anyone playing the constitution breaking game.
A large part of my job is research and analysis, including statistical research. Now, please take my words with a pinch of salt as there are people far more experienced in performing statistical analysis on elections than I. My analysis projects are typically not focused on election data.
However, my work was the result of many hours of analyzing numerous data points and I was able to get a couple of apolitical & educated analysts to look over my work and verify that my methodology was sound.
As best I can tell, the only states that President Trump might have lost are: Hawaii Vermont New York Massachusetts Rhode Island Maryland
That's it. He won every other state and the vast majority he won comfortably. He even won California. Not by a blowout, but he won it.
As to the states I listed that President Trump might have lost, New York & Rhode Island are really close. Close enough that he might have actually won them.
Hawaii, Vermont, Mass & Maryland were close but a slight edge to Mashed Potato Brains.
This was a popular vote blowout that exceeded even the 1984 election.
https://www.eac.gov/news/2021/08/16/us-election-assistance-commission-releases-2020-election-administration-and-voting
Not sure what you want me to take from this, TPSM?
Although as an aside, I did use that link for some of the data in my analysis, specifically the majority of Americans supposedly voting by mail instead of in person.
I'm ready now! Let's go! Today is a good day!
This is using the wrong numbers.
Official turnout numbers were reported as 66.8% of citizens, which is around 155 million. This post seems to be taking 69% (a number I cannot find on any official counts) of the number of registered voters, 168 million, which gets to the 115 million count.
So this person is an idiot or trying to mislead you intentionally.
The guy definitely makes an erroneous calculation, one that President Trump and his team would easily catch. So why retruth it? Is it because the Census Bureau data is claiming 91.7% of registered voters turned out? That doesn’t seem plausible at all, and the only turnout percentage that matters is registered voters.
https://www.eac.gov/news/2021/08/16/us-election-assistance-commission-releases-2020-election-administration-and-voting
Caught these two statements in the Crnsus Bureau report:
This means at least 21.6% of registered voters did not vote. I say at least because we are not given a value for the other reasons listed in the second statement. So 78.4% or 131,955 million registered voters voted. Deducting President Trump’s 74 million leaves Biden with 57,955 million registered voters.
So the OP on Truth is wrong in the numbers he used, but if we dig deeper into the Census Bureau report, it still supports the conclusion Joe Biden did not receive 81 million registered, legal votes. He received roughly 58 million.