re: Ballard and accusations now being brought forth....
Hmmm... Doing a bit of a dive on this. Lots of fodder there for speculation. However....
You can often ascertain the direction that certain information and messages are coming from by deconstructing the techniques and methods they use to impress, direct and /or manipulate (aka psyop) the audience's response.
So, for me, rather than digging on all the accusations and claims, my first port of call is to look at what is being said, by who, and in what manner.
Sometimes you can just get a sense of the spirit behind things. (If I was unable to do that, i would never have listened to Q or pursued Q in the first place.)
Is it a mean spirit? is it intended to be divisive, to inspire mistrust as opposed to trust? When it inspires trust, is intended to inspire trust that is reactive and emotional, rather than trust through discernment and independence rather than by appealing to authority?
Yes, there are things that can be questioned.
However, a few things I find encouraging, because they are great targets for deconstruction of (psyop) effectiveness:
WHO
Lin Wood and such ilk are heavily attacking Ballard and Caviezel, and Gibson. (apart from anyone or everyone associated with MAGA and Q, etc). I find that encouraging because if Lin wood is attacking it, that's pretty much like CNN attacking it in my book.
HOW
A LOT of people are attacking Ballard, etc. Some of the questioning is valid, but they ALSO rely heavily on set prejudices, association, etc., that trigger (in certain people's minds) reactive and negative responses. Religious prejudice, guilt by association, innuendo, etc.
WHAT
That's another point in the favor of Ballard etc, because the psyop technique of attacking in order to cast doubt by triggering 'bogeymen' and prejudices is well established and by now, hacky.
I found another "investigative" Mormon Stories piece 'raising concerns' about Ballard, OUR, etc, which in the same breath as certain concerns, also cites
"using false statistic to over-state the prevalence of sex trafficking worldwide to lure donors"
"using excessive emotion and religion manipulation to lure donors by claims to be called by God and being protected by God..."
"Drawing money away from legitimate charities who are meaningfully providing solutions...."
Plus the kicker:
"Associating with and taking advantage of known false conspiracy theories like QAnon."
All those things tell me something about where the 'investigator' is coming from.
aka
'false statistics' = Child sex trafficking is not really that big a problem; "Claims to be called by God" = "how dare you say that God has called you to this work?!?!?!"; "legitimate charities" = red cross, oxfam, and all the establishment charities under Cabal control; "False conspiracy theories like qanon" = self-explanatory
This is just s small sample. Only a few data points in a big lake, but for my purposes, they are enough to quickly lead me personally to conclusions about what is going on here. (Maybe my training with Q for 5 years has paid off?)
I don't wish to spend much time on this, but at this juncture, it seems clear to me that the disinfo machine and agents (aka the infiltrators on 'our side' whose mission is to sow discord, confusion, blackpills and division) have been activated to attack Ballard, Caviezel, Sound of Freedom, and Mel.
I see the same spirit that attacks Trump (when they can) because he's evil, he's one of the 'elite', he had a photo with Epstein, he's deep state mobilized to keep us all asleep, etc.
Sound of Freedom is a massive red pill for the wider public. Unless of course we have more than 50 million anons in the USA (I guess that's possible, but where are they all?). As such, the DS Cabal will pull out ALL the stops to cast doubt, dismay, discord, distrust, etc.
It will mobilize the 'LEFT' aka the neo marxist propaganda arm of the media world. It will mobilize the 'RIGHT' aka the infiltrators and disinfo agents and provocateurs within the Q movement and the Great Awakening sphere. All attacking the same thing.
If that isn't a tell, I don't know what is.
PS. I'm not posting links etc here. If you spend even a short time digging on Ballard, OUR, i.e. "timothy blain ballard" or Carlos Slim Ballard, etc iv afreespoke or google you'll find the muck. And, it's mucky. So if you want to dive in, do so. What I'm reporting here is simply my own findings and my own conclusions.
One anon's opinion. Research for yourself. But be prepared for the muck, and ask yourself "what is the spirit active here?" The masters of deceit are masters for a reason. Learn to identify their tactics and their ... vibe. What feelings do they inspire?
Great post, the snarky tone of those types of articles are huge giveaways. Classic liberal media holier than thou bs much of the time
Saul Alinskis Rules for Radicles rule #4: ridicule is the most powerful weapon. Pelosis “wrap-up smear” tactic is relatively the same. Thats what they do. It is really their only weapon that works. Anyone who has EVER had a direct debate with a leftard has experienced this first hand. Anytime you ask them to back up ANYTHING the state as fact, they whip out this tactic. “If you haven't figured it out by now, you never will”. Ive heard that several times. Every time I turn THAT around, they get literally loud and emotional. Lefties done think. They regurgitate talking points. Thats it. When you give SOLID provable facts they use derision tactics to disqualify the facts as “conspiracy-theory”. PERFECT RESPONSE TO THAT: “ Intellectual Lethargy is a serious issue with the well intentioned uninformed”.
Re: Wood. If true, yes. And I was a huge supporter of him early on.
Yep, "The Authority" was where I started my adventures, due to the post on GAW.
It's a wild ride, and very mucky. Sigh. Reminds me of the good old days when anons would scramble and ramble and fling stuff at each other and get all worked up about some issue or person, trying to figure out "is this a black hat, white hat? Are we being deceived? Etc. Etc. Etc"
Good old fashioned mayhem and controversy.
Actually a good opportunity for them newbie anons to cut their teeth on some serious sleuthing and discernment building. Which is one reason I posted my report and approach, rather than facts themselves (hey, I don't have 3 days to dig through all of this).
I think you're about to. I think it will reach an audience of over 100 mil worldwide, maybe more. MAGA people are 90% of the way there, anyone that questioned the vax/covid response and supports Trump is most of the way there. I think you've got about 15-20 mil anons right now. More globally. Trumps about to go full Q tard and name drop all the major talking points in rallies, mark my words.
I agree, and given enough time doing this, you eventually do earn your right to wear the tin foil hat atop your frog avatar XD but seriously, yes, it can take years of this process. I started my journey in a about 2010ish, been down all the rabbit holes. When Q came along, I agreed with the general 'tenet's of what it proposed or suggested people research, but the people that became invested seemed like 'babies first conspiracy theory'....
Now actually, that's exactly what it was. And even though I was condescending towards it, no other 'conspiracy' movement has brought in so many people, and had them so focused and aligned. I've been an asshole towards and, but now I've gone full Q tard, and I say that as someone that once referred to Q invested anons as Q tards. It was spot on, all along. I was just arrogant. It was designed to redpill 'boomers' and 'normies' and it has.
I believe that over time, I have learned or gained 'discernment'. I can read between lines and suss things out, but I also know when to stop 'digging' and trust my heart on certain issues, certain people etc. This is where I get frustrated, when my heart and my discernment tells me to stop questioning and trust somebody, and people insist on digging and calling into question their character, are they a black hat etc. In my condescension, I believe I just 'know' and it gets frustrating. It's my own ego and arrogance.
Even though I'm pretty sure of what my gut, heart and discernment are telling me, people are at different stages of the awakening experience. We need to be kinder, but we also need to be able to express our opinions when people are wasting their time going down rabbit holes of questioning when they need to just shut up and go with their heart sometimes. I also want to be able to refer to myself and others as tards and whatever else, without people being offended. Chan culture was at the birth of all this, whether people know it or not. Hope that makes sense
If this movie, the people behind it and the movement it's inspiring are a sinister plot to deceive us, steal our spiritual energy and generally have some evil effect, well blow me down. We're completely screwed in that case. I don't feel that in my heart and I don't want to believe that. That's where my questioning ends. I think it's genuine and the reaction from people is genuine. I think this is what we've all been waiting for, and if it's not then blow us all down and damn us to hell
Lin Wood is attacking the film and Tim?
A year after Tim Ballard was promoted by Q (post 1881), President Trump appointed Ballard in 2019 to the White House Public-Private Partnership Advisory Council to End Human Trafficking...
Tim Ballard also met with Ivanka Trump and a group of Senators back in 2017 to promote legislation which aimed to prevent human trafficking...
Fucking Shame on those aligned with the Deep State Team Pedo's in attacking this film and Ballard...🤬🤬
I didn't know any of that Purk! And I agree!!
😎🙏🏻
I saw an interview with Kash Patel and he was singing high praises of Ballard and Caviezel
And Wood came out so strongly pro-Q, too. Even onstage in front of audiences. "Q is REAL!" he exclaimed.
They alwasy try to get out front and any opposition movement, and turn it to the direction they want it to go. They have used that tactic successfully for many years.
I've seen two telegram posts by woods that impugn Ballard. Another telegram channel that is heavily pro-woods and which attacks a lot of other Maga and anon people is attacking ballard, OUR, etc.
The assertion includes labeling Ballard as the new Gregg Phillips.
Acts 5:38 So in the present case I tell you, keep away from these men and let them alone, for if this plan or this undertaking is of man, it will fail; 39 but if it is of God, you will not be able to overthrow them. You might even be found opposing God!" So they took his advice,
This is the same thought I have with the relentless attacks on Trump. They invest so much time and energy attacking, but they will not be victorious. There is obviously a greater power involved, one that they cannot fight and win.
Isaiah 54:17 no weapon forged against you will prevail, and you will refute every tongue that accuses you. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and this is their vindication from me,” declares the LORD.
God wins!
Amen.
Information Warfare
Well said. Also when you have Q saying Ballard isn’t just some vigilante, what are the most likely facts then about him and his operations given the success?
I look forward to the Documentary series by Mel Gibson about child trafficking, I hope and pray that will go much further into this to wake more normies to this foul reality.
Based on Mel's "Passion of the Christ", I don't think his version of things will be anything less than R rated, and maybe NC-17.
Nobody with a brain would let their movie get the NC-17 rating. Kiss of death dollar-wise.
I was being somewhat sarcastic with the NC-17 comment, but I think Mel would not hold back in making a documentary about it pretty shocking and definitely R rated.
I like this post because it points to how to develop discernment of Truth by identifying tactics used. Another tactic used often in articles or tweets or truth social posts? Labels or nicknames. Whether th label is false or true, this technique is purposed to influence.
I also like to dig into the origin of a story. Often it exposes a "huge" story as just an opinion that was recirculated and embellished a lot. In this case, the origins might be people with something to cover up. If there is a stylistic relationship, say to anti-Trump stories, it points to a common origin. The anti-SOF apologies have a familiar ring too.
I would think if Ballard did have any experience with the Mormons, it could be a plus for him; certainly the FLDS has a history of sexual oppression and underage abuse, although they wouldn't seem to require trafficked victims. But the main church has the international connections. Is it a slam on Ballard, or the LDS church? Is he a whistleblower or a red herring in this aspect?
The FLDS is the actual representation of the original church. Do some digging at exmormon.org.
I believe you, but which is more likely to be involved in child trafficking and opposed to SOF? They used to have an adoption agency which went out of business in 2014 because birth mothers, presumably Mormons, were keeping their babies.
https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/church/news/lds-family-services-no-longer-operating-as-adoption-agency?lang=eng
So that might leave a baby vacuum. There was that baby mill with an attorney making money from it. Some people would call this a form of trafficking and a version of sex slavery.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/12/01/paul-petersen-sentenced-6-plu
Ballard appears to come from Mormon stock and have a mormon background. The investigation by "legendary Utah journalist and investigator Lynn Packer" states it is not asserting that any of the allegations are true, simply that the investigator has gathered evidence in support of the allegations. There seems to be about 12 allegations in all.
I see Mr. Packer is quite opposed to Ballard. https://americancrimejournal.com/acj-investigates/operation-underground-railroad-o-u-r/
I have to say, it tends to make me scoff when his articles talk about a MAGA porn flick. I saw the interview with the Utah AG who was praising Ballard for this film, the article Packer has titled °What is he smoking?" Methinks there is a lot of kink in Utah and I'm going to take Packer with a load of salt. If Ballard is the bad guy, his stories are like Balaam's curses, they have an opposite effect.
Pretty hard to see Ballard as a bad guy and the SOF to be a scam when DJT has just announced he'll be hosting a showing at his own (alt) residence!
Wow. Great dig. The sauce I found is very .... carefully worked .... in its attacks on ballard and OUR.
Here, Packer takes out his obvious sledge hammer.
Here's the thing. The crimes and sins of the so-called religious -whether Mormon, Catholic, Protestant, Pentecostal, Moslem, Hindu or What have you - are a super bonus to those who would destroy God's work (in whatever form).
The Enemy's greatest pleasures come when he can infiltrate and corrupt any effort, organized or whatever, to raise people's spirituality and bring them closer to God.
The sorts of attacks I've seen over the years, when people who are charlatans themselves pose as great exposure of corruption (by others)... they often have a similar ring to them.
He who shouts loudest.....
OUR has a YouTube channel with so many videos I didn't page through all, covering many aspects of their work, victim stories too. And Tim Ballard has a this one, "The Scripture that Saved My Life From Drug Traffickers" on LDS Living, so if this is really him (seems young) he is apparently a believing LDS. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJof2_59vbc
Which brings me back to what I was wondering before, is the official LDS church involved and if so, how?
re: the WHAT and mormons
Mormons are full of Freemasons and CRAP
That is all
Yeah Mormons make me sus. Not gonna lie.
Edit to add: However I’m Catholic so I’m sure there’s a lot who could say the same about me. Just because your institution is infiltrated doesn’t mean you are. We love America and it’s obviously run by evil. Doesn’t make us less American or evil. We can still love the founding principles and defend them.
Pretty much everyone is full of freemasons and crap. It's not exactly an exclusive club.
This post is as timely as it is well-written.
Newcomers brought here by the Sound of Freedom may benefit from this case-study on information warfare.
I'm just going to say this, because I've been seeing this stuff all day, all over the place, and I'm exhausted trying to reply and argue with so many different people.
When it come to Tim Ballard, I don't give a toss whether he's a Mormon, Jew, Muslim, atheist or scientologist. I couldn't give a shit whether he's a 33rd degree freemason or a Satanist, honestly. If he does the work he claims to do, and has done the things he's apparently done, he's a god damn hero, regardless of any flaws he may or may not have.
Jim Caviezel, Tim Ballard, Mel Gibson, Jordan Peterson, Trump. They are all clearly attaching themselves to this movie. Either there is a nefarious plot for Tim Ballard to grift everyone's sympathy and money, and he's managed to fool all these people (including Trump!?!?) and we're being psyoped by this grifting mastermind black hat agent of the Cabal, or it's exactly what it looks like and feels like - Something real and genuine. Something that is on our side and likely part of 'the plan' or at least a plan.
Trump supports this movie, it's clear from recent events at the UFC. He will likely talk about it further as it gains traction. If we're getting played, GEOTUS is as well, and then where are we? The entire Q thing would fall apart completely. So get a grip people. It's good to question things, but being so cynical and paranoid is quite frankly, retarded.
👏👏👏
I'm with you. Religious views need to keep their rightful place. I understand the perspective that many believers have towards other faiths, including the Mormons. But no religious institutions are without their corruptions, and no one doctrine has a monopoly on truth. In some instances, we need to be able to accept our personal theological differences and recognize that God works in mysterious ways.
Kash Patel has given an interview backing Ballard 100%, and states that Caviezel is a personal friend.
https://twitter.com/patri0tcontr0l/status/1679138932884226056
Stand by to see disinfo agents attack Kash.....
thankyou fren
I think a lot of the overly conspiratorial stuff comes from people listening to too many literal nobodies on tiktok or twitter, taking it as gospel and trying to fit it into an increasingly complex mega conspiracy that becomes so complex and and ridiculous you lose sight of things. I'm a 'conspiracy theorist' as much as the next person, but I try to use some discernment. We have, for lack of a better word, 'verified' patriots, people that get the Trump tick of approval. If he's in on it too and everything is manipulated to that extend, we may as well give up honestly because it implies a level of control, psyops and complexity that it's completely overwhelming. Sorry for the frustration.
It's good frustration. See my comment reply to Pepesee:
https://greatawakening.win/p/16birCsWS1/x/c/4TvATbzZ3Fi
This is how I see. IF someone has screwed up in the past, not saying Ballard did but IF, and that person turns their life around works to save children from trafficking, what's more important? Look at how H'weird has beat up on Mel Gibson. That whole "car accident" was a setup. He knows what they are and they know he knows what they are and they hate him for it.
This, to me, is the crux of this particular information warfare:
'false statistics' = Child sex trafficking is not really that big a problem; "Claims to be called by God" = "how dare you say that God has called you to this work?!?!?!"; "legitimate charities" = red cross, oxfam, and all the establishment charities under Cabal control; "False conspiracy theories like qanon" = self-explanatory
Thank you for the post.
Edit: I would like to acknowledge u/smartbaum for their more detailed response to these particulars. The points are fair. Psyops can work in a lot of ways, and research and discernment should always be used, despite these pretty clear "red flags" pointed out by OP.
Ftr, I'm with OP.
Nice post
I will say; watching The Sound of Freedom unleashed emotion that hit like a ton of bricks, more so than the mere sum of its parts. I believe this movie to have a touch of divinity in it, I wiped my eyes for two hours and fifteen minutes. Sometimes you have to trust your heart and leave it at that.
amen
This is the reason I made this post a couple days ago. It’s an interview with Jordan Peterson, and Tim Ballard, and Jim Caviezel.
Basically… Jordan Peterson is asking Tim Ballard, all the questions regarding people making specific accusations against him.
I’m sure you will find plenty of the above, in this interview. Thanks for this post. Great! Well done!
I saw the post, opened in a tab, but didn't follow through. Thanks for raising this again. I'll make time to watch it.
PS. Kash Patel did a talk with American Sunrise (Real America's Voice) (not sure of date) backing Ballard and Caviezel, and stating how Ballard worked with him at the White House to reduce human trafficking by "50%".
https://twitter.com/patri0tcontr0l/status/1679138932884226056
A great post and timely too. Evil's favorite tactic is to use projection and it is essentially, 'bearing false witness'.... that Evil all too commonly utilizes. I believe by directly calling out the biblical transgression, it causes the enemy to falter.
It's interesting that so many of 'Q' posts uses the word 'projection'. So many times, it was difficult deciding on the best one.
u/#q3436
I’ve also noticed no sauce with the posts. Guilt by association tactics. Some people are flat out even saying the Clinton’s financed SoF, because Carlos Slim donated to the Clintons, ergo that’s the Clinton’s financed it. They also dig up old photos of Gibson next to Nygard and claim they’re best friends, no other proof. Very sensationalist. But the way of saying it is with an air of authority on the matter like they do have the sauce, so unfortunately a lot of people fall for it.
unfortunately, not all anons are intelligent enough to discern truth from retardation
Would anyone associated with the black hats and their trafficking operations also be associated with a movie exposing child trafficking?
Hell no! Anyone buying their attacks is stupid. Anyone pushing their attacks, including those posting them here, is the fucking enemy.
A couple of comments while I'm still very cool and detached regarding Ballard...
Maybe, maybe not. I think it's a weak point. Maybe it takes an accomplished huckster to recognize a competing huckster when their "attention" space overlaps?
Substitute the words "nomenclature" for "manipulation" and "encourage" for "lure" and this is factually the case as far as I've seen. It's a common thread among a lot of personalities and orgs that have tie-ins to the topics of concern for the anon communities. Even the ones that go out of their way to claim no affinity to the anon communities.
One can take with that as one chooses. For myself and past experience, I will make this point: the moment an individual or org makes a direct, overt connection between their work and God's work in some special way, in context of putting out content that includes requests for financial assistance for them to continue, when the target audience is known to share convictions about both God and the purpose of the individual or organization's cause.... well, I turn around and go the other direction. I give no benefit of the doubt because that is the easiest way to fleece people, period. Does that mean Ballard and Caviezel are specifially doing that? Not necessarily, but its a bad look at least to anyone who pays attention to movements at this level.
Just set emotion aside and be wary, folks. Keep digging and don't be satisfied with someone else's "research" and conclusions if something doesn't sit right with you.
I definitely understand what you're saying here. However, I'd point out the the reason Tim B did what he ultimately did was because of his, and his wife's particularly, religious convictions. I don't think you can tell this story without mentioning God, and God's children. That was almost the point of the movie.
Did you see it?
No, I don't really go to the movies anymore. Admittedly I prefer to stick to non-fiction or at least non-dramatized sources for getting up to speed on issues.
Also keep in mind, for me at least, to highlight the authentic motives of the people involved based on their religious convictions doesn't really soften my skeptical stance. So if I look at their religious affiliations (Ballard and Caveizel), I note those are the LDS institution and the Roman Catholic institution.
Off the top of my head, historically these institutions have both been involved with their own versions of:
fraud
unethical levels of control of their members
hypocrisy of all sorts among leadership
financial corruption
violent bloodshed by divine mandate (through an appointed authority figure issuing decrees)
large numbers of cases of sexual abuse accompanied by highly managed coverups
delusional, outlandish man-made teachings that are justified by claiming direct apostolic authority
Any given individual affiliated with either of these organizations are obviously not necessarily involved with or approving of any of those above practices. They can be the nicest most genuine people in the world. But yet. In context of this topic. For these two figureheads of sex trafficking/abuse and all else that goes with that, to simultaneously be enthusiastic card carrying members of their respective religious institutions, with several points listed above being in direct moral contradiction to their current cause of which they are figureheads, well does it at least raise questions? Has Ballard or Caviezel gone on record to criticize their own institutions for the above criminal and unethical practices? If not, how do we assess their genuine ability to experience and interpret reality and experiences, to investigate, to question authority when it goes against a moral fabric, to not be vulnerable to pressure from higher up authorities, to do and speak what is right and true despite consequences, to not package a message to garner publicity and protect others, etc.
I definitely see the harm that has been perpetrated through religions (religion being organized/controlled spiritual beliefs).
However, in this case it would seem to be throwing the baby out with the bathwater to say because the actor is a Catholic or Tim is Mormon that this film should be discredited.
I could tell from your post that you had not seen the movie. If you had seen it you would probably have posted a way different opinion. Just saying.
I don't think you can have a good read on the movie or what it's about, then, to be completely honest. I see your point about religious institutions and motives, but I suspect you're being overly cynical. I am no fan of churches or institutions. Religious talk CAN put me off, depending on the context. I am cutting Jim and Tim some slack in this regard, considering the subject matter, and considering that I believe them to be genuine in their faith.
Let's put it this way. It was suspicious/odd to me that Jim Caviezel in particular went full Q anon mode before the release of the film, yes. But I am convinced there is a reason for that. He is clearly effected from what he's seen and looked into in the time since filming. I think it's a genuine thing, and I also think it's part of the marketing strategy, along with everything else. If you look honestly at this movie, everything behind it, connected to it and involved in it's release are deliberate, strategic choices. It is no coincidence, nor is it coincidence what follows. This is the big awakening moment for the masses and I think you should be slightly less critical of the personal faith of some of the individuals involved, in this instance. Do yourself a favour and WATCH the film
Fair, constructive insights.
Agreed.
Agreed. It's a weak point. What I really offer in the post is by no means conclusive. However, personally, my view is that Woods is not just a huckster but a serious DS asset, so in combination with a number of other factors, I find this element 'encouraging' in terms of a pro-Ballard view. That's all.
I cannot speak to the claim, as I haven't investigated Ballard's actual 'donation soliciting behavior'. I agree with you that the combination of solicitation for financial (or other) support with religious or spiritual claims are an area fraught with exploitability.
On the other hand, if the man and organization have a genuine belief and faith that God called him and is protecting him, what then should he do?
Your stated choice to "turn around and go in the other direction", giving no benefit of the doubt is a personal choice (well stated), but I'm inclined to think that [it's (sic) a bad look] only to people with your particular angle of skepticism and choice. I don't know that it is a bad look in all cases. Then again, as I said, I haven't review Ballards soliciting methods or rhetoric, so that's really simply opinion on my part.
All in all, you make good arguments for your chosen view on the topics.
Post 1881 confirms op in place.
Thanks for taking the time to write this. Really good post. Sound of Freedom, and the subject of child trafficking, is dominating the internet in a way that I have never seen before. The movie is perfect for normies, because it shows child trafficking, but does not bring into play politicians as pedos, adrenochrome, organ harvesting, and the general Satanic thing. These elements would have had the normies dismissing the whole thing. It stuck to the particular story, one that is easily proven true.
Thank you🙏
Excellence. You have summed this up perfectly.
Good post and thanks for digging deeper and confirming what I already believed but had no sauce. Any narrative that is aligning with a pedo death cult assault is a pedo death cult narrative no matter whose mouth it is coming from.
First of all what is this "Mormon Stories"? Never heard of it, nothing they say carries any water with me. And Mel and Jim and Tim have all been in the news for years calling out trafficking. So why would "Mormon Stories" decide to start attacking now? They can have no other reason than narrative building and the narrative they are working on aligns precisely with the pedo death cult.
You can look it up. Shouldn't be too hard to find with a few choice terms in your preferred search engine.
The investigation (the summary page links to a video on youtube, btw) was published in December 2020. It's angle is not Sound of Freedom related, from what I can see, but rather, is Mormon focused, because Ballard has connections with the Mormon community. In other words, the investigation's primary audience is the Mormon community itself, and it is 'raising concerns' about Ballard and OUR.
Aka that OUR is not genuine, and that Ballard is scamming people.
My point was that a source is feeding the beast from an angle unknown by the general public until now. The fact they are using Mormonism as cover to ride the cabal assault on Ballard, Gibson and Caviziel seems pretty suspicious, doesnt it?
aha.
The fact that Devin Nunes re-Truthed something someone posted about this group or this guy is a WHO that bothers me though. Someone posted it here earlier today I will try to find it.
I believe this is the TS Truth you are referring to, which apparently Nunes "liked", according to @KAGdrogo at twitter. However, I cannot see Nunes anywhere among the "likes" for this truth.
https://truthsocial.com/@therealtoriabrooke/posts/110691658288517316
187 retruths, 283 likes but no nunes.
The particular controversy here is not Ballard or Caviezel, but that apparently Carlos Slim contributed to the funding for the film.
However, as one person points out under this point on truth:
Someone else mentioned that big players like Carlos play both sides of the table, to keep up appearances.
FWIW,
https://twitter.com/KAGdrogo/status/1679213259663245313