Great post, the snarky tone of those types of articles are huge giveaways. Classic liberal media holier than thou bs much of the time

"The Authority" is in the "exposing Tim Ballard" camp. He's pretty notorious for being right in the middle of various anon controversies....

Edit: And if THIS doesn't convince people Lin Wood is a total asshole fraud, I don't know what will.

Lin Wood is attacking the film and Tim?

Acts 5:38 So in the present case I tell you, keep away from these men and let them alone, for if this plan or this undertaking is of man, it will fail; 39 but if it is of God, you will not be able to overthrow them. You might even be found opposing God!" So they took his advice,

This is the same thought I have with the relentless attacks on Trump. They invest so much time and energy attacking, but they will not be victorious. There is obviously a greater power involved, one that they cannot fight and win.

Isaiah 54:17 no weapon forged against you will prevail, and you will refute every tongue that accuses you. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and this is their vindication from me,” declares the LORD.

God wins!

Information Warfare

Well said. Also when you have Q saying Ballard isn’t just some vigilante, what are the most likely facts then about him and his operations given the success?

I look forward to the Documentary series by Mel Gibson about child trafficking, I hope and pray that will go much further into this to wake more normies to this foul reality.

I like this post because it points to how to develop discernment of Truth by identifying tactics used. Another tactic used often in articles or tweets or truth social posts? Labels or nicknames. Whether th label is false or true, this technique is purposed to influence.

I also like to dig into the origin of a story. Often it exposes a "huge" story as just an opinion that was recirculated and embellished a lot. In this case, the origins might be people with something to cover up. If there is a stylistic relationship, say to anti-Trump stories, it points to a common origin. The anti-SOF apologies have a familiar ring too.

I would think if Ballard did have any experience with the Mormons, it could be a plus for him; certainly the FLDS has a history of sexual oppression and underage abuse, although they wouldn't seem to require trafficked victims. But the main church has the international connections. Is it a slam on Ballard, or the LDS church? Is he a whistleblower or a red herring in this aspect?

re: the WHAT and mormons

Mormons are full of Freemasons and CRAP

That is all

This post is as timely as it is well-written.

Newcomers brought here by the Sound of Freedom may benefit from this case-study on information warfare.

I'm just going to say this, because I've been seeing this stuff all day, all over the place, and I'm exhausted trying to reply and argue with so many different people.

When it come to Tim Ballard, I don't give a toss whether he's a Mormon, Jew, Muslim, atheist or scientologist. I couldn't give a shit whether he's a 33rd degree freemason or a Satanist, honestly. If he does the work he claims to do, and has done the things he's apparently done, he's a god damn hero, regardless of any flaws he may or may not have.

Jim Caviezel, Tim Ballard, Mel Gibson, Jordan Peterson, Trump. They are all clearly attaching themselves to this movie. Either there is a nefarious plot for Tim Ballard to grift everyone's sympathy and money, and he's managed to fool all these people (including Trump!?!?) and we're being psyoped by this grifting mastermind black hat agent of the Cabal, or it's exactly what it looks like and feels like - Something real and genuine. Something that is on our side and likely part of 'the plan' or at least a plan.

Trump supports this movie, it's clear from recent events at the UFC. He will likely talk about it further as it gains traction. If we're getting played, GEOTUS is as well, and then where are we? The entire Q thing would fall apart completely. So get a grip people. It's good to question things, but being so cynical and paranoid is quite frankly, retarded.

This is how I see. IF someone has screwed up in the past, not saying Ballard did but IF, and that person turns their life around works to save children from trafficking, what's more important? Look at how H'weird has beat up on Mel Gibson. That whole "car accident" was a setup. He knows what they are and they know he knows what they are and they hate him for it.

This, to me, is the crux of this particular information warfare:

'false statistics' = Child sex trafficking is not really that big a problem; "Claims to be called by God" = "how dare you say that God has called you to this work?!?!?!"; "legitimate charities" = red cross, oxfam, and all the establishment charities under Cabal control; "False conspiracy theories like qanon" = self-explanatory

Thank you for the post.

Edit: I would like to acknowledge u/smartbaum for their more detailed response to these particulars. The points are fair. Psyops can work in a lot of ways, and research and discernment should always be used, despite these pretty clear "red flags" pointed out by OP.

Ftr, I'm with OP.

Nice post

I will say; watching The Sound of Freedom unleashed emotion that hit like a ton of bricks, more so than the mere sum of its parts. I believe this movie to have a touch of divinity in it, I wiped my eyes for two hours and fifteen minutes. Sometimes you have to trust your heart and leave it at that.

This is the reason I made this post a couple days ago. It’s an interview with Jordan Peterson, and Tim Ballard, and Jim Caviezel.

Basically… Jordan Peterson is asking Tim Ballard, all the questions regarding people making specific accusations against him.

I’m sure you will find plenty of the above, in this interview. Thanks for this post. Great! Well done!

A great post and timely too. Evil's favorite tactic is to use projection and it is essentially, 'bearing false witness'.... that Evil all too commonly utilizes. I believe by directly calling out the biblical transgression, it causes the enemy to falter.

It's interesting that so many of 'Q' posts uses the word 'projection'. So many times, it was difficult deciding on the best one.

u/#q3436

I’ve also noticed no sauce with the posts. Guilt by association tactics. Some people are flat out even saying the Clinton’s financed SoF, because Carlos Slim donated to the Clintons, ergo that’s the Clinton’s financed it. They also dig up old photos of Gibson next to Nygard and claim they’re best friends, no other proof. Very sensationalist. But the way of saying it is with an air of authority on the matter like they do have the sauce, so unfortunately a lot of people fall for it.

Would anyone associated with the black hats and their trafficking operations also be associated with a movie exposing child trafficking?

Hell no! Anyone buying their attacks is stupid. Anyone pushing their attacks, including those posting them here, is the fucking enemy.

A couple of comments while I'm still very cool and detached regarding Ballard...

Lin Wood and such ilk are heavily attacking Ballard and Caviezel, and Gibson. (apart from anyone or everyone associated with MAGA and Q, etc). I find that encouraging because if Lin wood is attacking it, that's pretty much like CNN attacking it in my book.

Maybe, maybe not. I think it's a weak point. Maybe it takes an accomplished huckster to recognize a competing huckster when their "attention" space overlaps?

"using excessive emotion and religion manipulation to lure donors by claims to be called by God and being protected by God..."

Substitute the words "nomenclature" for "manipulation" and "encourage" for "lure" and this is factually the case as far as I've seen. It's a common thread among a lot of personalities and orgs that have tie-ins to the topics of concern for the anon communities. Even the ones that go out of their way to claim no affinity to the anon communities.

One can take with that as one chooses. For myself and past experience, I will make this point: the moment an individual or org makes a direct, overt connection between their work and God's work in some special way, in context of putting out content that includes requests for financial assistance for them to continue, when the target audience is known to share convictions about both God and the purpose of the individual or organization's cause.... well, I turn around and go the other direction. I give no benefit of the doubt because that is the easiest way to fleece people, period. Does that mean Ballard and Caviezel are specifially doing that? Not necessarily, but its a bad look at least to anyone who pays attention to movements at this level.

Just set emotion aside and be wary, folks. Keep digging and don't be satisfied with someone else's "research" and conclusions if something doesn't sit right with you.

Post 1881 confirms op in place.

Thanks for taking the time to write this. Really good post. Sound of Freedom, and the subject of child trafficking, is dominating the internet in a way that I have never seen before. The movie is perfect for normies, because it shows child trafficking, but does not bring into play politicians as pedos, adrenochrome, organ harvesting, and the general Satanic thing. These elements would have had the normies dismissing the whole thing. It stuck to the particular story, one that is easily proven true.

Thank you🙏

Excellence. You have summed this up perfectly.

Good post and thanks for digging deeper and confirming what I already believed but had no sauce. Any narrative that is aligning with a pedo death cult assault is a pedo death cult narrative no matter whose mouth it is coming from.

First of all what is this "Mormon Stories"? Never heard of it, nothing they say carries any water with me. And Mel and Jim and Tim have all been in the news for years calling out trafficking. So why would "Mormon Stories" decide to start attacking now? They can have no other reason than narrative building and the narrative they are working on aligns precisely with the pedo death cult.

The fact that Devin Nunes re-Truthed something someone posted about this group or this guy is a WHO that bothers me though. Someone posted it here earlier today I will try to find it.