So petty. You know what drop they were referring to.
These kinds of responses remind me of the mightier than thou types of christians who embarrass newcomers while they're still learning. I'm a Christian and recognize how this makes us look bad.
Then be helpful. I've been doing this since 2018 so I understand the the making fools of us. But I still try to be helpful, not critical of exact verbiage.
You knew exactly which drop the op was referencing.
You also hurt us by the tone of your response which turns off newcomers.
I was helpful. I posted the exact drop, and encouraged you to use critical thinking skills rather than emotion to interpret the drops or the tone of my response. Also, you only speak for yourself, not "us." Have a good evening.
I do now see you did below. I'm not offended when I'm corrected. I just often feel bad for the friends I've brought to this board who get blasted when they slip up a little or see it happen to others. It's embarrassing to bring people here to see how others get treated. It makes us look bad.
Thank you for posting the screenshot of the correct drop. You have a good evening too friend!
All that was stated as the fact. It wasn't belligerent, it wasn't abusive, and its wasn't aggressive in any way.
If it stings a little to some highly sensitive person, then its worth it, because in fact, accuracy IS important.
I'm glad you voiced your view, but I wonder how much of it is projection. You accused the commenter who did nothing but make a simple statement "petty".
Some folks are not newcomers, and we shouldn't patronizing, either. IMO.
I had the question yesterday evening after sodding my yard two days straight. So sorry I couldn’t exactly remember how the phrase went, which is why I didn’t put quotes around that part, but only the part I could remember. If it bothered you so much you could’ve kept on scrolling.
I knew exactly what you meant. You weren't quoting Q directly. You were simply referring to the post about first arrests.
I do understand how people make us look bad because they quote things Q never said. But it's ridiculous how overboard some go here.
WTF are you talking about? Language and meaning are very important especially as the leftist pedo death cult twists and tortures our language to fit their agenda. This isnt some simple spelling nazi on a message board. Language matters and in this war it matters a lot.
Normally I'd agree but it's an important distinction. A lot of truthers got people hooked on the first arrest being shocking and that totally alters expectations.
PapaPatriot is right. A lot of overbearing Bible Thumpers have basically commendered many of the good patriot boards to constantly push their narrative at the expense of other POV, and seem to trash anyone that does not agree with their barage of messaging. As much as they want this site to be 'all about Q and their Trump worship' its not. There are great articles about climate, medicine, world events that good researchers post. So attacking someone because they do not quote 'Q' correctly, and instead paraphrase him, is ridiculous. I have actually seen his quote numerous times to the point where people quoted it and believed it to be a Q message. Here is the actual quote involving the first arrest:
First indictment [unseal] will trigger mass pop awakening. FIRST ARREST will verify action and confirm future direction. They will fight but you are ready. Marker [9]. Q
Are you ready to see ARRESTs? Are you ready to see PAIN? Are you ready to be part of history? Q
So, the 1st indictment of trump did trigger a lot of people and get them going...
and He was "Arrested" on June 13th according to CNN..... so does this fit the post.....???? or are we looking for something else...
I don’t think it was Trump’s indictment. It did not trigger a mass awakening. The normies are still normies. The arrest/indictment should be one that essentially opens closed eyes.
I would say first arrest showing direction would not be trump cause if that’s the direction they are going it’s coming after us. The direction we want it to go is all these corrupt people being arrested and in handcuffs carted off to prison to await hanging. Trump was not what we consider arrested
Notice I didn’t put quotes around “shocks the world”… because I could remember for certain what that part was. But EVERYONE here knows what I was referring to. Lighten up.
Q 3717
First indictment [unseal] will trigger mass pop awakening.
FIRST ARREST will verify action and confirm future direction.
They will fight but you are ready.
Marker [9].
Q
When q says it will verify action and confirm future direction: literally Q’s first post was HRC will be arrested. That not only would confirm action but we will know the future direction. Nothing can stop what is coming.
Watch the 9/11 video from 2016. Pay close attention to her feet. Pay attention to the cameraman purposefully moving in the way of the camera to block the view. Pay attention to where her hands are.
It very much looks like she was put in that van very much against her will.
Was she arrested that day? Right then and there? I have no proof of it other than that video, but i believe it to be so.
Do you have proof of this? Or is it your word against mine? Remember, great movies require great actors, or something to that effect. Body doubles exist, and tweets aren't confirmation that she's free, either. And if she really did win the 'popular vote' for 2016, then why didn't she run again for 2020? Surely she would have been a better candidate than Biden.
I choose to believe that she was arrested that day. She looks cuffed and she was definitely resisting. You can choose to believe otherwise. Neither of us truly know.
Yes, I have proof. Look at extraordinary attention given to arrest of Trump in NY and the arrest of Trump in FL have generated. You think an arrest of Hillary would have stayed secret? Secret arrests and secret trials are also illegal.
Biden won the "popular vote" by a greater margin that Hillary got.
Ask yourself a dumb question? Why would something as eye opening and inert important suggest something like that if there were nothing to it? There are no coincidences frog!
That’s good ! Not saying he is the first arrest , none of us no that for sure , but one thing is for certain ,,, future direction ,, all presidents are eligible for arrest ! Wow that definitly makes sense ! Good call , again not saying that’s what it is , but atleast it makes sense , unlike all the ripping apart patriots on here , we need to stay strong and together , correction is one thing… Some comments border on humiliation , being talked to like you’re an uninformed idiot over somewhat miss quoting part of a drop is a bit much . Anon didn’t speak to the press for Gods sake, he tried to bring something up for communication! Cheers Fren !
"Despite Carroll’s claims that Trump had raped her, they noted, the jury stopped short of saying he committed that particular offense. Instead, jurors opted for a second option: sexual abuse.
“This was a rape claim, this was a rape case all along, and the jury rejected that — made other findings,” his lawyer, Joe Tacopina, said outside the courthouse."
But I wonder who is supposed to awaken? Maybe it's the mass awakening of those worried about being exposed. And they realize the direction this is going and there's no way out for them?
Wouldn't it be funny if Q was referring to Hunter being arrested, leading to the arrest of "Pop" thereby awakening all the normies to the Biden crimes and the Deep State?
4566
Jul 02, 2020 5:18:30 PM EDT
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6
https://twitter.com/rn__deplorable/status/1278778177574318086
Impressive, most impressive.
Argument: "Maxwell is not a big enough name to trigger a mass awakening." [example]
Counter-argument: Do not make statements based on assumption of 'worth' and/or 'value'. Do not think 'today' but rather 'after' today.
ONE LEADS TO ANOTHER TO ANOTHER TO ANOTHER.
ONE LEADS TO MANY.
Crimes against Children = common denominator [no matter political affiliation][MASS POP awakening].
Have faith in Humanity.
Q
No where did Q say “first arrest shocks the world”
👆
So petty. You know what drop they were referring to. These kinds of responses remind me of the mightier than thou types of christians who embarrass newcomers while they're still learning. I'm a Christian and recognize how this makes us look bad.
Words and context matter. This is a Q research board. Post the drop and discuss it as written, not something made up.
Then be helpful. I've been doing this since 2018 so I understand the the making fools of us. But I still try to be helpful, not critical of exact verbiage. You knew exactly which drop the op was referencing. You also hurt us by the tone of your response which turns off newcomers.
I was helpful. I posted the exact drop, and encouraged you to use critical thinking skills rather than emotion to interpret the drops or the tone of my response. Also, you only speak for yourself, not "us." Have a good evening.
I do now see you did below. I'm not offended when I'm corrected. I just often feel bad for the friends I've brought to this board who get blasted when they slip up a little or see it happen to others. It's embarrassing to bring people here to see how others get treated. It makes us look bad. Thank you for posting the screenshot of the correct drop. You have a good evening too friend!
Buttercups gotta buckle up. Q and the digital war is not for sissies.
You sort of jumped the gun yourself, Papa. No?
All that was stated as the fact. It wasn't belligerent, it wasn't abusive, and its wasn't aggressive in any way.
If it stings a little to some highly sensitive person, then its worth it, because in fact, accuracy IS important.
I'm glad you voiced your view, but I wonder how much of it is projection. You accused the commenter who did nothing but make a simple statement "petty".
Some folks are not newcomers, and we shouldn't patronizing, either. IMO.
OP truthloveliberty joined GAW two years ago.
If anyone is turning off new comers it’s you.
I had the question yesterday evening after sodding my yard two days straight. So sorry I couldn’t exactly remember how the phrase went, which is why I didn’t put quotes around that part, but only the part I could remember. If it bothered you so much you could’ve kept on scrolling.
I knew exactly what you meant. You weren't quoting Q directly. You were simply referring to the post about first arrests. I do understand how people make us look bad because they quote things Q never said. But it's ridiculous how overboard some go here.
Still crying this morning, eh?
The side bar calls for high quality posts only, anon. "I couldn't remember bc I was tired from sodding" is a poor excuse.
Hey guess what? You don’t have to click on a post you perceive as low quality. You certainly don’t have to comment.
And if you wanted to actually discuss the question, the discussion could be high quality, but you prevent that because you want to be a nit picker.
WTF are you talking about? Language and meaning are very important especially as the leftist pedo death cult twists and tortures our language to fit their agenda. This isnt some simple spelling nazi on a message board. Language matters and in this war it matters a lot.
Pay attention: I didn’t use quotes around “shocks the world”
Such a leftist comment. Lol
Sigh. Such infighting.
I don't think we need it.
This post rings like a sorority house catfight.
Commenting here only because the comment has to come somewhere...
Normally I'd agree but it's an important distinction. A lot of truthers got people hooked on the first arrest being shocking and that totally alters expectations.
PapaPatriot is right. A lot of overbearing Bible Thumpers have basically commendered many of the good patriot boards to constantly push their narrative at the expense of other POV, and seem to trash anyone that does not agree with their barage of messaging. As much as they want this site to be 'all about Q and their Trump worship' its not. There are great articles about climate, medicine, world events that good researchers post. So attacking someone because they do not quote 'Q' correctly, and instead paraphrase him, is ridiculous. I have actually seen his quote numerous times to the point where people quoted it and believed it to be a Q message. Here is the actual quote involving the first arrest:
First indictment [unseal] will trigger mass pop awakening. FIRST ARREST will verify action and confirm future direction. They will fight but you are ready. Marker [9]. Q
Are you ready to see ARRESTs? Are you ready to see PAIN? Are you ready to be part of history? Q
Here is a search function for the word "shock" https://operationq.pub/?q=shock
Its easy to make mistakes in quotes. Give Patriots a break when it comes to posts
Amen!
u/#q3717
So, the 1st indictment of trump did trigger a lot of people and get them going... and He was "Arrested" on June 13th according to CNN..... so does this fit the post.....???? or are we looking for something else...
I don’t think it was Trump’s indictment. It did not trigger a mass awakening. The normies are still normies. The arrest/indictment should be one that essentially opens closed eyes.
OK. So are you making an assertion that the so-called 'first arrest' will trigger a mass awakening, or otherwise shock the world?
How does that assertion relate to the Q drops, given that the Q drops most certainly don't make that assertion?
Can you clarify your thought process here? Thanks.
My question was plain as day.
Arrest = indictment Shock = awaken
I would say first arrest showing direction would not be trump cause if that’s the direction they are going it’s coming after us. The direction we want it to go is all these corrupt people being arrested and in handcuffs carted off to prison to await hanging. Trump was not what we consider arrested
Hopefully BHO with his fake birthday certificate, fake social security number, fake citizenship, fake children, fake “wife”, and fake Presidency.
Notice I didn’t put quotes around “shocks the world”… because I could remember for certain what that part was. But EVERYONE here knows what I was referring to. Lighten up.
Q 3717 First indictment [unseal] will trigger mass pop awakening. FIRST ARREST will verify action and confirm future direction. They will fight but you are ready. Marker [9]. Q
First arrest will be HRC.
When q says it will verify action and confirm future direction: literally Q’s first post was HRC will be arrested. That not only would confirm action but we will know the future direction. Nothing can stop what is coming.
Wasn't she already?
real raw news of course! That's the source for the arrest, tribunal, and execution of the entire cabal. Marvelous fiction.
Kek. True. So true.
You are probably right. That's the real Joe Biden and we aren't watching a movie.. 🤫
When?
Watch the 9/11 video from 2016. Pay close attention to her feet. Pay attention to the cameraman purposefully moving in the way of the camera to block the view. Pay attention to where her hands are.
It very much looks like she was put in that van very much against her will.
Was she arrested that day? Right then and there? I have no proof of it other than that video, but i believe it to be so.
Video for reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hex7-Frttu8
She was not.
Do you have proof of this? Or is it your word against mine? Remember, great movies require great actors, or something to that effect. Body doubles exist, and tweets aren't confirmation that she's free, either. And if she really did win the 'popular vote' for 2016, then why didn't she run again for 2020? Surely she would have been a better candidate than Biden.
I choose to believe that she was arrested that day. She looks cuffed and she was definitely resisting. You can choose to believe otherwise. Neither of us truly know.
You have the burden of proof to show that all her appearances since this “arrest” are actually body doubles.
Yes, I have proof. Look at extraordinary attention given to arrest of Trump in NY and the arrest of Trump in FL have generated. You think an arrest of Hillary would have stayed secret? Secret arrests and secret trials are also illegal.
Biden won the "popular vote" by a greater margin that Hillary got.
First you ask when, then you write that it's not true when the answer is provided. Those two thoughts seem incompatible.
I thought the poster might have been confusing being investigated with being arrested.
Could be: but keep in mind if we’re watching a movie then things have already been done and we are witnessing actors acting a part.
Like your thinking... I forgot about that post.
If It hasn't happened already...
Q did tell us that Hunter purposely left that laptop at the repair store.
Q implied it. Didn't "tell" us.
Distinctions matter.
And why would it be that way? Because you can never let the enemy know what your plan is. It was implied for a reason. Everything has meaning.
um, ok. I just said that Q didn't tell us, Q implied it. No other comment.
Ask yourself a dumb question? Why would something as eye opening and inert important suggest something like that if there were nothing to it? There are no coincidences frog!
Wasn’t Trump the first arrest?
Does that confirm future direction?
Yes. All former Presidents are now eligible for arrest.
That’s good ! Not saying he is the first arrest , none of us no that for sure , but one thing is for certain ,,, future direction ,, all presidents are eligible for arrest ! Wow that definitly makes sense ! Good call , again not saying that’s what it is , but atleast it makes sense , unlike all the ripping apart patriots on here , we need to stay strong and together , correction is one thing… Some comments border on humiliation , being talked to like you’re an uninformed idiot over somewhat miss quoting part of a drop is a bit much . Anon didn’t speak to the press for Gods sake, he tried to bring something up for communication! Cheers Fren !
He’s the only one who has been arrested and jury found him guilty of being a rapist.
That was a civil case, not criminal. No indictment in that case. The judgement was "found liable", not "guilty". The distinction is important.
“The distinction is important “ 100 percent !
You should read the articles that you reference:
"Despite Carroll’s claims that Trump had raped her, they noted, the jury stopped short of saying he committed that particular offense. Instead, jurors opted for a second option: sexual abuse.
“This was a rape claim, this was a rape case all along, and the jury rejected that — made other findings,” his lawyer, Joe Tacopina, said outside the courthouse."
Ah a retarded handshake. Liable for sexual abuse, not guilty of rape. Take your leftist faggotry back to reddit.
Didn’t trigger a mass awakening though.
I agree
But I wonder who is supposed to awaken? Maybe it's the mass awakening of those worried about being exposed. And they realize the direction this is going and there's no way out for them?
u/#q3717
I don't know at this point. I used to think that might be the case.
But the more shocking thing right now is how he's not being arrested or impeached.
So if he gets arrested it won't really be much of a shock, more like psh, it's about fricking time
I don't want jojo, to get impeached. I want the awakening to continue full speed.
Impeaching jojo would be a disappointment.
Think Redford and McQueen. Sting operation.
Think pokemon. Gotta catch 'em all!
I guess we would all be shocked as it would mean the justice system is finally working !
Came here to say just this...
I always thought that was Epstein and Ghislaine, now more than ever.
Wouldn't it be funny if Q was referring to Hunter being arrested, leading to the arrest of "Pop" thereby awakening all the normies to the Biden crimes and the Deep State?
u/#what
According to Q it was GM
Correct
4566 Jul 02, 2020 5:18:30 PM EDT Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 https://twitter.com/rn__deplorable/status/1278778177574318086 Impressive, most impressive. Argument: "Maxwell is not a big enough name to trigger a mass awakening." [example] Counter-argument: Do not make statements based on assumption of 'worth' and/or 'value'. Do not think 'today' but rather 'after' today. ONE LEADS TO ANOTHER TO ANOTHER TO ANOTHER. ONE LEADS TO MANY. Crimes against Children = common denominator [no matter political affiliation][MASS POP awakening]. Have faith in Humanity. Q
Why is this pinned?
Because someone thought it would make a good discussion.
Looks like may be talking about the over 400,000 sealed indictments
I don't think that was ever legit.
Mike Pence is a pedophile
There is not enough ways to voice this through text except: Sigh.
If Only!
Trump has had 7 people arrested resulting from the first special council
So which arrest are we on?
Placeholder #2?
I love the speculations about "first arrest" every single time anyone of significance either gets arrested or looks like they might get arrested.
And, we know its the indictment that triggers mass awakening. The first arrest is not the thing that triggers shock, awakening or anything like that.
According to Q.
I'm 99% going with the first indictment already occurred, that it was perhaps Epstein, or Maxwell, but either way, it's way in the past.
We've had too many significant indictments and too many significant arrests for anything from this point onwards to be
"The FIRST....."
https://qanon.pub/?q=first%20arrest
https://qanon.pub/?q=shock%20the%20world
Humans, you do have a tendency to get things mixed up quite often....
TS?
Wouldn't that be nice!
I think perhaps this post is referring to Trump and the lawfare situation.
no personally i dont think it will come as much of a shock,.to most people,.Id be more shocked if he was even arrested at all,.!
No.