Had this waiting for me this morning...
Sydney Powell led the charge in the 2020 election fraud issue by revealing that the US Military had solid evidence of the fraud in their supercomputer Kraken records.
Milley, the head of the Joint Chiefs at the time, was a solid Biden backer and refused to allow this information to be released. At that time the US Military was dealing with 5 fronts as the CCP was coming across the border from Canada and Soros and Antifa were creating riots.
Trump and his Junta decided the threat of civil war was too great and they would instead bide their time. Sydney wanted to go to SCOTUS but was told by Trump to stand down.
It is time for the Kraken evidence to be revealed, and what better way than via Sydney Powell defending herself. Media interviews await, her huge compilation of evidence
is available worldwide and to all. By pleading guilty to the charges, she speeds the case to the point where suppressing this evidence will not happen. Go Sydney!
The ones that put this out have a rather high perch(not the judges) and have access to info not even the judges have, they can be somewhat mercurial but they have also yet to be wrong so I thought I'd post it...
edit: first time EVER(decades...) that they have made any emotional exclamation or sign of enthusiasm so that ending.....
EDIT 2 : TBF the DS/Kazahrians are very much aware of these people and the operation is getting to a point where this might be a faint designed to get them to jump the gun, they have successfully done this before so.... In any case it is a sign of something being just around the corner as I have yet to see anything from them not be followed by something irl real worthy of serious note....
Honest question- How can Sidney defend herself when she entered guilty plea, removing necessity of trial? While it was stipulated Sidney would have to testify truthfully IF called, no prosecutor in their right mind would put her on the stand so there would not be any opportunity for her to testify. So, how does she defend herself?
You hit the nail on the head. There are other flaws in this story, but this point makes the whole thing moot.
But it's fun fanfiction
But what about the fire emojis?
But if this is all a show, then it's plausible. The prosecutors could be doing their part as directed. If the end is already known and NCSWIC then everything we are seeing is being directed.
Nobody has kept their mouth shut, we all know its a show, we were told so, so what's your point?
Sidney Powell is no longer under the restraints of the trial. It's dead in the water. She pleaded guilty to misdemeanors....nothing burgers. IMHO, the prosecution wanted Sidney Powell to appear in court to railroad her. The Kraken evidence appears as though it would not be germane to the charges weighed against her, anyway. Court rooms are a place of peril. This is why 95 percent of cases are plead outside of the court. Sydney Powell's attorneys recognized this court as being highly political and biased. This was a kangaroo court. Why do I say this?
It was clear for anyone watching the defense attorney argue for dismissal that the prosecution refused to acknowledge and respond to the exculpatory evidence sent to them. It was clear that the exculpatory evidence should have ended all the charges against Powell. It couldn't be any more clear than the evidence presented to them. As a result, the defense was forced to motion the court on this issue. In court, the prosecution argued before the judge that all of this should be heard in the trial. This argument is absurd and this evidence provided the judge should have been grounds for immediate dismissal and sanctions against the Fulton County for wasting the courts time when such evidence was already known. The prosecution's argument only confirmed as being true that the they refused to acknowledge and respond to the exonerating evidence. The legal precedent in any case is that the prosecution should acknowledge such evidence and when such exculpatory evidence is provided, agree to withdraw the case fro dismissal. However, the prosecutor's intent was to get Sidney Powell in court no matter what. The judge listened to the defense, but it was obvious he wasn't going to budge. This was a kangaroo court for political purposes.
I believe Sidney Powell is aware of the Kraken information and undoubtedly briefed on it, but doesn't possess it. There may be more reason why Trump recently posted in clear language that Sidney Powell was never Trump's attorney.
If, somehow, she does have the documents to prove the point, his statement would make it better "optics" for her to testify in Trump's case.
Think about this for a moment..... Sidney Powell may have had clearance to see or be briefed on this. I don't know. Where she got this information is not clear though. The unfortunate write-up of Wikipedia makes Sidney Powell, who having a stellar and highly respected career, appear as being a criminal. They even provide her Fulton County mugshot. The entire emphasis of it is the recent 'guilty plea' to mere misdemeanors, but making it appear as evidence of RICO. It's a shameful example of slander of an upright and innocent individual.
Powell was not part of Trump's legal team though. IMHO, she was brought in to provide Trump with her viewpoint on the massive election fraud and how to challenge it. What did she know then? It has been reported, they rejected her opinion.
The question in my mind is how and when did Powell learn about Kraken? IMHO, Powell could not possibly have this information in her possession. If anything, it is SCIF material. She was an assistant United States attorney for the Western and Northern Districts of Texas and the Eastern District of Virginia, but most recently had her on practice at law. In 2020, Powell established Legal Defense Fund for the American Republic, a 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization with stated purpose to collect funds to help prosecute fraud in U.S. elections.
She couldn’t talk about it before because of the bs charges hanging over her…. Now that those are gone she can bring it up without damaging a ongoing case/investigation into her..
The question is what does she actually know and what evidence can she provide? As you mentioned, this might be the reason she was ensnared in this ridiculous RICO case. The idea of presenting evidence in court is determined by the judge as to what is permitted. Many crimes are committed in those court rooms. Many judges are corrupt and there's not always justice that is served, but rather to these bad judges, it is 'just us' that's served. From there dark chambers nobody else will know.
effectively shutting her down preventing any releases? She wasn't even Trumps attorney. The 'proof' offered that she is team Trump is just a video of Guilliani saying as much? Meaningless. It's all rather desperate to keep the J6 alive
Who says a prosecutor must be the one to call her?
A defendant in a different trial could call her as a witness to support the election stolen viewpoint.
But ... why would she have info/data that the military has and won't release?
I think she's still a defendant in the defamation case brought by Dominion though, along with Giuliani and Mike Lindell. Those cases have been consolidated for purposes of discovery IIRC.
She is also an unindicted co-conspirator in the DC case against Trump.
Remember early kraken talk from powell was followed by a supposed rv explosion. Pepperidge farm remembers.
Nashville TN, Christmas eve
complete with weird loudspeaker warning beforehand
And do you remember the videos of some energy beam , the whole thing was strange
Christmas morning, 2020.
I remember that but did that explosion directly effect Powell somehow?
“How do you get evidence submitted legally?” She had to agree to be depose as part of her plea! You never put someone on the stand without understanding their testimony. I believe she reps military not DJT. She said she can’t represent DJT because of a conflict - I attended a speech she gave. I believe Sidney is going to produce the evidence to the prosecutor creating panic and dismissal of the criminal case! That is why she can withdraw plea by November 5. Think of the panic if this case is dismissed.
This makes a lot of sense SwampEagle83! Thank you. She was representing the military position of commander in chief but not Trump personally. Makes a lot of sense and allows her to be a necessary distance from Trump in the rest. I always thought she played a key role. Q's last comment for a good year once was just "Durham" and when John D's report seemed to be a nothing burger it makes me think he was just a necessary distraction & Powell, a Durham SC native, just might be who that was about. Her wanting to be tried separately & pleading guilty might look like her bailing but I don't think that's her style. IMHO, it's more likely to a some sort of strategy. You know, sacrifice a few pieces to checkmate the king / lose a few battles to win the war, sort of thing.
https://www.cbs17.com/news/national-news/sidney-powell-pleads-guilty-over-efforts-to-overturn-trump-loss-in-georgia/
I heard she can prosecute in a military trial….. I heard that a very long time ago, so I’m sorry I don’t have a link…
I've always loved that clip!
I am not military, so sow does one tell those Marines (been told they are, not sure) are JAG?
Thank you for clarifying that. I really wish I knew more about military protocols, it would help analysis so much more.
How can this be if she's never been in the military?
Yeah, but he was facing federal charges in civilian court. He wouldn't need a military lawyer.
and yes, I checked her bio. She has never been in the military.
Jolly rancher is a shill
Basically it probably means it didn't flip.
And some people are saying this might have been only about his grand jury testimony. So this could have happened months ago.
"They will finally release all the evidence once they are in court" is something I have been hearing for 3 years now and it never happened.
Seems like there's other ways to legally introduce evidence without getting yourself convicted.
Art of the rope-a-dope....
You don't want to telegraph anything that might indicate following the rope is anything other than 'we got them now', the rope-a-dope works by the impact being the first indication they get of being a dope....
"The ones that put this out..." Can you give us the source for this?
Unfortunately not yet, there is an order to things and before the right set of information is out there revealing them would not go down well, my mentioning of rfid tagged ballots that could be tracked by a simple smart-phone app didn't go down all that well before people had enough additional precursor info to be able to digest it, and this one is a LOT bigger and harder to swallow without additional preexisting info supporting it...
Hmm, OK for now I suppose we can tentatively accept that explanation; however, in the fullness of time, it would be most helpful (and convincing) if eventually the source could be identified. As it stands now, your post is compelling, but not 100% convincing.
BUT (!!!), having said that, the PDF document link does seem to support your post. Rather than get lost in the 'high weeds' of the document, I read the executive summary at the beginning and then skipped to pages 163-164 for the Conclusion and summary statements.
Very interesting stuff there. Now we have to wonder, when will this particular Kraken be released upon America? Soon I hope.
12 day old account say what?
Then maybe getting back to work would be a good idea & leaving the rest of us alone instead of calling us larpers when you have been on this site for 12 days. Some of us here have been on here from the inception. And we all KNOW the election was stolen.
They are no longer sending their best and brightest.
da fuck?
For those who were wondering:
Junta
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/junta
it's not the definition i'm questioning here.
Sorry fren, I didn't mean that 😳
I simply was curious about what that term was & figured it was some sort of slam against Trump & looked it up. I should have spelled that out more clearly.
Figured some other pedes could use some help too.
Certainly wondering why they would lob Trump in with a military coup style leadership. Though now that I think about it, deep state may see it exactly as that. How many decades have they been allowed to simply cheat as desired to install their people into positions they can control?
If the military stopped the cheat in 2016, as many have speculated, then deep state would certainly consider it a coup by the military.
The reality is that no military coup happened, simply those whom have been trained to believe the cheat is a normal part of the process would see it as such.
hey yeah we're trackin man, didn't mean to sound like it was you i was comin at.
No worries & I appreciate that. The bond of Anons is strong IMO
We might get frustrated with each other from time to time. Maybe even think some of the stuff each other believe is nuts given the other info we have decided is accurate (really accurate or not).
Ultimately we are all in this trench together & where we go one we really do go all. Lifting each other up & carrying your brother in armemes is just part of the job to help each of us to the glorious win at the end of it all.
Keep up the good work fren.
Junta isn't necessarily a negative just because that is the only way the 'media' has used it.....
Too much of peoples views on words, terms and notions have been shaped by their media, so much so that most don't even realize it.
Anarchy is another such word that they have twisted to be associated with what they want, the closest political direction to anarchy in a party form, is libertarians.....
Exactly, this looked like the language straight from the lefties.
Not a lawfag here, so help me out those who are. As long as her case was ongoing, wouldn't that also tie-up any evidence she had? But now that evidence may be available for other cases?
As per of her plea deal.
She has to "testify truthfully" in other trials as part of this case.
She's not done yet.
Hall and Chesebro also have to testify as part of their plea deals.
Oh no we can't release the Kraken, there is COVID. You remember COVID right?! When we wore the masks at concerts to protect us from COVID when we weren't rioting about Saint Floyd?
🤣🤣🤣
https://www.rawstory.com/trump-fraud-trial-delay/
At this point we have absolutely no idea who is on whose side, nor what information they have, nor what is happening - apart from occasional encouragement through deltas. We are up to our necks in fake news and psyops and at times have difficulty in telling what is true/false/relevant/disinfo etc.
BUT then we are watching several movies, and we have no idea what the scriptwriters have prepared with each twist and turn.
"Milley, the head of the Joint Chiefs at the time, was a solid Biden backer and refused to allow this information to be released. At that time the US Military was dealing with 5 fronts as the CCP was coming across the border from Canada and Soros and Antifa were creating riots."
Being Chief-of-Staff Milley has no authority of military operations. The chairman is prohibited by law from having operational command authority over the armed forces. CJS acts as the principal military advisor to the president, the National Security Council,[3] the Homeland Security Council,[3] and the secretary of defense The basic role of the CJS is being the official military advisor to the president.
Albeit, Milley has boasted about impersonating the president.... a treasonous act in his book, the authority of withholding solid evidence of fraud in the US Military's supercomputer Kraken records, would ultimately have come from the Biden Administration itself. Milley may have been the adviser to squelch this information.... or unlawfully commanded the military to not release it. The end result is the same. It was never released..... And failing to do so, is an act of treason.
Official power vs power wielded because 'that's how it's always been'...
In politics and power-struggle enough power in the right position can make all the difference, technically alive vs irl dead...
Is the kraken a blue octopus?
It's a blue haired octopussy hat!
It was Phil Waldron.
Octopuses camouflage to their surroundings in both color and texture. Fascinating creatures and a fun yewtu.be search.
I saw an interview with her years ago now, where she was asked what the kraken was. She said she didn't even know what a kraken was, but she'd heard it somewhere so it sounded good. How someone with her education could be ignorant of basic Greek mythology is beyond me.
Maybe she slept through the classics.
YES, it was an interview with Dinesh D'Souza from early 2021.
My biggest fear is that we talk about the secret evidence that will show the world it was stolen for years and nothing ever comes of it
"fear is the mind-killer", may be the most true and accurate sentence every used in literature/film.....
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F9DKsf8X0AErgBy?format=jpg&name=small
https://nypost.com/2023/10/22/trump-and-giuliani-never-fell-for-sidney-powells-crazy-s-t-but-the-left-sure-did/
Trump and Giuliani never fell for Sidney Powell’s 2020 election ‘Kraken’ — but the left sure did
This is great, thank you for the link …. I def plan on reading the whole thing
Powell, Wood, Flynn, etc. are pieces on the board ready to move when needed. We're watching the worlds greatest chess match. Some pieces have to be 'sacrificed' or conduct a feint from our perspective to stay ahead of the DS.
Enjoy your very short stint here on GAW Cody4517...
You newbie trolls stick out like sore thumbs!
KEK..
That was pretty quick!
u/#byebye
u/#glowie