No, The Constitution Does Not Allow Children Born Of Non-Citizens To Become President Of The United States
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
Comments (104)
sorted by:
Nikki Haley, the daughter of two non-citizens, is patently ineligible to serve as President or Vice President under Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution
The following analysis is a detailed response to critiques of an article I wrote earlier this month that garnered national attention, and was even Truthed by President Trump, shedding light on Nikki Haley’s ineligibility to serve as President or Vice President under the Constitution. My article was published originally on my Substack and American Greatness, and was titled “The Constitution Absolutely Prohibits Nikki Haley From Being President Or Vice President.”
Now do Kamala Harris.
And obama
Obama's mother was American though
Obama is kenyan
Doesn’t matter, his mom was American. Whether he was born overseas or not, he has American citizenship from birth. I have a friend whose dad was born in Saudi Arabia and has at least one American parent so he has American citizenship. Does not have Saudi citizenship, he’s a White American, not Arab.
Natural born vs native born. Not the same thing.
Related concept but Need to an amendment to clarify 14th amendment on anchor babies. Lots of misinterpretation of 14th which has allowed anchor baby issue
In that case, citizenship is NOT automatic from birth.
It must be applied for:
https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/travel-legal-considerations/us-citizenship/Acquisition-US-Citizenship-Child-Born-Abroad.html
However, this thread is about the consitutional requirements of POTUS, which has to be a "NATURAL BORN Citizen," not merely a "Citizen."
What does being white have to do with nationality? KEK.
I’m just saying he’s not an Arab despite being born in Saudi Arabia
Daddy was British (Kenya was a UK territory), assuming his story is remotely true, and Barry was probably born in Kenya.
Exactly.
Only if we followed the Constitution and not the corporate policy of rhe deep state insurgents.
Exactly. Law of the land and tell them to shove their Maritime laws.
And yet they make up crimes to remove Trump from the primary ballot while letting Nikki Haley stay on the same ballots.
Too bad Vivek never pointed this out in the “ debates”
Good observation. What question the follows?
Is he unaware? ( Nescience)
Let's presume he is, what then does that tell you about him and his adherence to the rule of law?
What other reason could there be for someone like him to ignore the constitutional provision?
Does he share the same disability?
If not, what would then cause him to outright ignore the constitutional requitement? To combat a competitor for high office, would that not be a legitimate matter to point out? Or has politics become so divorced from the constitution that constitutional requirements no longer hold sway? If so, what does that tell you?
Probably he is in the same boat.
Interdasting…..
Vivek, like Nimrata ("Nikki"), Kamala Harris, Ted Cruz, and Brak 0bummer... are all not "Natural Born Citizens" of the USA. And cannot be President, legally.
Her name is “Nimrata”?
This story sucks.
P.S. Haley is only barely her last name (it’s her married name, and she’s cheated on him at least twice, per affidavit). Her real surname is Randhawa.
Also, and strangely, she changed her husband’s first name. That was a new one on me. Didn’t like his first name, so got everyone to call him by his middle name, including he himself. Seriously gross cuck shit.
Not a Natural Born Citizen
A creature of the MIC
Lies about her name
Got into politics because Hillary Clinton was such an inspiration for her (not a joke)
Funded by Reid Hoffman and other people who are even worse
Betrayed Trump and MAGA.
Fuuuuuck Offfff Cunt. Keep walking.
Named for Nimrod.
Yep, that was my exact thought.
Friggin Semiramis and Tammuz everywhere.
Fall, Babylon. FALL!
Afraid of being called a “birther”? The liberal left have managed to censor our speech in many subtle and not so subtle ways. One of the worst things they have done to if you ask me. Watch “All In The Family” some time and count all the words we aren’t allowed to say now but were allowed back in the day.
While true, what are the odds that All in the Family - which starred [Rob Reiner] and [Bea Arthur], began being broadcast on CBS under [Fred Silverman], continued being broadcast under Steering Committee member of the Bilderburg Group Arthur R. Taylor, was developed by [Norman Lear], and also had a certain [pattern of writers https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_All_in_the_Family_episodes ] - was created to inflame passions among Hegelian targets from being spoken about hatefully for nigh a decade? How come the other auditions for Michael were [Harrison Ford] and [Richard Dreyfuss]?
Obviously the common denominator among those listed is that they’re all men, but more than that, free speech does not necessarily equate to wise speech or moral speech.
Good point, I didn’t know the back history.
It didn’t occur to me to look until the last few years. I never liked the show, though. Unnecessarily rude and not nearly as funny as say, Married with Children. Just heavily divisive - granted MwC was probably much more destructive to familial ideals.
Moving forward, we can’t let people who hate God, freedom, and our country program us again.
He is not eligible either....that's probably why.
That is their MO even in the past.
This will be addressed by SCOTUS in the near future. Thank you for sharing this information.
What about the finding that being born on American soil, within the national boundaries, makes one a natural born citizen? Any weight to that?
You have to go back to what the founders meant by "Natural Born Citizen."
It meant being born (a) on American soil (b) to two American citizen parents.
Remember, there was no such thing as a general US citizenship. Everyone was a citizen of the State where they were born, and therefor could be referred to as US citizen (until the 14th screwed it all up).
The only exception was for those who were living at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, because the USA and citizenship of the States did not exist until the British colonies broke away.
Why would they want ONLY a natural born citizen -- and not just any citizen?
Because of loyalty. Loyal to America, not the foreign country where they were born.
This is also why the 14th Amendment includes "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof." Any child whose parents were citizens of another country are subject to that foreign country.
Two Mexican citizens invade the USA and have a baby. That child is subject to the jurisdiction of Mexico, and therefore are Mexican citizens.
The idea of the anchor baby is not law. It is merely a regulation on how to interpret the law, and that can be reversed with an executive order by the POTUS.
THIS ⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️
Born on US soil = granting of citizenship automatically, although I consider that an incorrect decision and unConstitutional.
But not a "Natural Born" Citizen. Meaning born to two American citizens, on US soil.
If my parents are both American citizens why do I need to be born on US soil? People take vacations.
That would be a citizen (automatically), but not, as I understand it, a natural born citizen.
The distinction is meant to more or less equate to “didn’t need any paperwork to be recognized as American, and has no other citizenship “.
That is my read of it. But unfortunately unlike the Great and Powerful Brak 0bummer, I am not a Constitutional Scholar. So IANAL and YMMV.
The question comes when neither parent is a citizen. The Founding Fathers did not want to hand us back to the UK. Or any other foreign nation. This will definitely head to SCOTUS.
That's right, according to Article II, sec 1 of the Constitution, qualifications for President, Nikki Haley is not eligible to run for POTUS because she is NOT a NATURAL-BORN citizen, she is a NATURALIZED citizen which DISQUALIFIES her. The same thing goes for Kamala Harris, she NEVER was elligible to become Vice-President because she is also NOT a NATURAL-BORN citizen, she is a NATURALIZED citizen which automatically DISQUALIFIES her as well.
The Deep State has fooled most Americans once again, just like they got away with it when BHO became Fraud-In-Chief and all the corrupt Courts dismissed any challenge to his legitimacy as President because they no longer had standing.
The two most important questions here are; WHAT IS A NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN? AND WHAT IS A NATURALIZED CITIZEN? The DS and MSM have confused many Americans about the truth on this matter. This topic usually does not get much traction or interest from Patriots, so I will say it again. I commented on this topic earlier in the week, being that I am quite familiar with and did the extensive research 16 years ago and really wish to share it with as many Patriots as possible.
The Legal Definition of NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN found in Article II of the Constitution for qualifications for the Office of President was INVENTED by a famous International Lawyer, way back in 1758 whom is the undisputed authority on this matter.
A NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN is a person whom is born of TWO CITIZENS OF THE SAME NATION. It was a well respected International Lawyer by the name of Emer DeVattel who INVENTED the Legal term NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN which appears in his world renown Law Publication, known as Law Of Nations 1758.
Emer DeVattel's, 1758 LAW OF NATIONS was HEAVILY consulted by the Founding Fathers, the framers of our Constitution. In his writings, BENJAMIN FRANKLIN actually tells us that Law Of Nations was consulted regularly when framing the Constitution. The Framers of the Constitution used the Legal term NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN which has its origins from DeVattel's Law Of Nations 1758.
The 1758 LAW OF NATIONS plainly states what NATURAL- BORN CITIZEN is; here is an excerpt from Law Of Nations;
("§212. Citizens and natives. - The natives, or Natural-Born Citizens, are those born in the country, of PARENTS who are citizens.")
Emer DeVattel invented the Legal term NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN 266 years ago and this term was afterward adopted and incorporated into the Constitution by the Founding Fathers, there is NO mystery here. Even the Supreme Court has NO AUTHORITY to interpret the definition of Natural-Born Citizen, as it stands in the US Constitution, because the INVENTOR of the LEGAL term NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN has already DEFINED the definition and meaning of it before SCOTUS ever existed. As such, Emer DeVattel is the absolute authority on this subject and the term Natural-Born Citizen cannot be interpreted in any other way except by the plain meaning of it defined in the Law Publication, LAW OF NATIONS 1758.
SOME Socialist Liberals have challenged these facts by using the 14th Amendment which deals with NATURALIZATION of citizens which does NOT mean Natural-Born Citizen. The Subject Matter of the 14th Amendment is NATURALIZATION also referred to as Birthright Citizenship ONLY and has NOTHING TO DO with Natural-Born American Citizens. The Legal Term NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN is NOT interchangeable with the Legal Term NATURALIZED CITIZEN, they have two separate and distinct meanings.
The Founding Fathers did not misunderstand the Legal Definition of NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN, the inclusion of this Legal Term was to eliminate the DANGER to the United States of America, of the possibility that a NATURALIZED CITIZEN that was elected President, could have ALLEGIANCES TO ANOTHER NATION and thereby cause great harm to the United States.
As Nikky Haley and Kamala Harris are NOT NATURAL-BORN CITIZENS of the United States, but are ONLY NATURALIZED CITIZENS. Their ALLEGIANCES are proven not to be to the United States, but to the dangerous GLOBALIST AGENDA. Its amazing how the Founding Fathers foresaw the DANGERS of electing a Naturalized Citizen as President so many years ago.
The point here, is that both the President and Vice-President as per Article II of the Constitution, MUST BE NATURAL-BORN CITIZENS. It is the SUPREME LAW of the United States of America.
I was born to two US citizens, on what was technically US soil (a US Army post in Frankfurt, Germany).
And I have a Naturalization certificate.
I think I am natural born because both of my parents were lifelong US citizens prior to my birth. But my Naturalization cert seems to indicate I'm a Naturalized citizen instead.
This shit is so needlessly mysterious and confusing, it is ridiculous.
Hi cqvfefe, you are a 100% NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN and you could run for President of the United States. Even if both your parents were stationed in another COUNTRY, being born of United States PARENTS automatically makes you Natural-Born anyway even if your Mom would have been off base it does not change anything. The key is to be born of US PARENTS. The Founding Fathers understood this.
If your PARENTS happened to be NATURALIZED parents BEFORE you were born, that still makes you a NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN and you can run for the Office of POTUS.
If you would have been born of PARENTS that were NATURALIZED AFTER you were born, then you would be a NATURALIZED CITIZEN. Anchor babies are NATURALIZED Citizens. If you would have been born of ONLY ONE American Citizen Parent then you would be considered a NATURALIZED Citizen.
In your case however, as you state, your Parents are LIFELONG CITIZENS and therefore are already NATURAL-BORN CITIZENS. I have no clue why you have a government issued NATURALIZATION Certificate, that is a total mistake and you could easily prove that you are a NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN. The problem is that many government employees don't understand the difference and assume that Naturalized means born in a different country even if your parents are US citizens.
The Socialist Democrats and Law Schools are doing everything to blur the lines and have on many occasions tried to say that NATURALIZATION is the same as NATURAL-BORN. That agenda will continue with Nikki, the DS and MSM operatives will push the LIE more than ever. That's how BHO was fraudulently elected as POTUS. His Mother was a Natural-Born Citizen, but BHO's father was a Kenyan, British Citizen at the time of his birth. And to this day BHO is not even Naturalized being that he is still using a stolen Connecticut SSN 042-684425 that belonged to a Harrison Bounell. Barry never lived in Connecticut.
The important issue to remember is the actual definition of NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN a Legal Term INVENTED by the famous International Lawyer, Emer DeVattel in 1758. His definition is very specitfic, Natural-Born Citizens, are those born in the country, of PARENTS who are citizens. That is as simple as it gets. You may say, well wait a minute, I was not born in the country on US soil so I must have been a German citizen which is not the case. AT birth your LOYALTY to the United States was automatically conferred upon you by your NATURAL-BORN PARENTS, making you a NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN of the United States. You were NEVER a German citizen and as such, you cannot be Naturalized if you were NOT a German citizen. In other words, if you are ALREADY a Natural-Born American Citizen, how in the world can you become NATURALIZED, it makes absolutely no sense, its an oxymoron.
When the Constitution was drawn up, we never had military bases in foreign lands and mothers always had their babies on US soil, it was a given. Military and diplomats were always Men in those days, that travelled to foreign countries, so it was never a question as to the nationality of the child. Things have changed since then, but the point is, that you were never a GERMAN citizen and as such, you can't legally be a Naturalized citizen if you were NEVER a foreigner in the first place.
It is really IMPORTANT to remember that if you are born of US Natural-Born Parents in another country you DO NOT AUTOMATICALLY BECOME A CITIZEN OF THAT FOREIGN COUNTRY. That is why you CAN NEVER BE NATURALIZED, its legally impossible because you were never a foreign citizen. ONLY people that ARE CITIZENS OF A FOREIGN COUNTRY can become NATURALIZED. Does that make sense to you, its not complicated at all when you look at it from a common sense perspective.
I remember, years ago when John McCain ran for POTUS, his birth was challenged being that he was not born on US soil, he was born in Panama. His Natural-Born Parents were stationed at a US Military Base in Panama. He was declared eligible to run for President nonetheless because he was not a foreigner that became Naturalized. Soooo, you certainly still can run for the Office of President if you wish, LOL. Sorry for the long explanation and tedious wordiness, but I hope this helps you wade through the confusion anyway. Best wishes.
Natural born!
US Army post in a foreign country is not US soil. The US embassy in that country is, but not the Army post.
Ergo, your parents applied for naturalization, which is probably automatic approval in those cases.
Same reason NoName was not eligible for POTUS.
Note that the US State Department passport records office was broken into in 2008, and Obama's and NoName's records were stolen.
The man who was called to testify about this was mysteriously murdered before he could testify.
The CEO of one of the companies involved was John Brennan. The other company involved got a no-bid contract to create billion-dollar Obamacare website that didn't work.
Nancy Pelosi was head of DNC in 2008, and only 49 States included a statement that Obama was constitutionally eligible. The exception was Hawaii.
Many judges in 2009-2010 refused to hear evidence of Obama's eligibility, just like they did for the 2020 election cases.
What's your opinion of my being natural born because both of my parents were lifelong US citizens, born in the US? IMO that makes me a natural born citizen so I didn't need a naturalization certificate.
This covers what you shared.
Article II, Section 1 Of The Constitution Requires That In Order To Meet The High Constitutional Threshold For Eligibility, The Qualifier’s Parents Must Have Both Been Citizens At The Time Of His Or Her Birth
Thank you for posting this.
No problem, with all the disinformation out there, its important for Patriots to understand this as best they can.
I never changed with what happened to JFK and time has proven me right. If you know the truth stick with it.
I agree try to understand it as best as you can and help others also to understand this.
Is Kenya part of the USA?
Unfortunately, I think so.
It is NOW, lol
Only if your name is Obummer. So they claim. We know better.
The Trump train is coming no brakes and Nikki is nothing but a lump on the tracks.....
😮🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Amen, and we will keep the prayers going.
NIMRATA RANDHAWA - Call her by her real original name.
Nimarata (just in case it matters)
Thank you for the reminder.
Constitution? What's that?
Determines the bonus added to hit dice of your player character. NPCs don't have the constitution, so cannot stand in the way of coming storm.
Further clarification
Thank you for the link. Hopefully people will pass this on.
Nor does the Constitution allow anchor babies.
Anchor babies seem to be misinterpretation of 14th amendment and term “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof”
Interestingly Native American Indians were not considered American “citizens” until much later or there was debate on matter until 1924 when they passed the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924. This makes me think if congress can pass one for Native American Indians then wouldn’t have to pass an amendment but only a law clarifying that anchor babies are not automatically citizens because “and subject to jurisdiction thereof” meaning foreigners are “subjects” to foreign powers and therefore not US citizens.
Indians were not citizens under the Constitution. They were "other persons" because they were not part of the new country.
But Congress has authority for naturalization laws.
They used the naturalization power to grant citizenship to Indians.
The anchor baby thins is ONLY a regulation, not a law. It can be overturned via executive order by the POTUS.
You are 100 percent correct.
The Snyder Act gave Indians like my grandfather citizenship and allowed them to vote in local and federal elections.
Exactly.
I can't even believe this is still in question.
Amen
Tell that to Obummer and Kumallonya
And all their frens who covered it all up.
This seems like such a black and white issue🤷🏼♂️
This will more then likely head to SCOTUS.
🙌🏻
No litigation required it is plainly stated in the constitution. I have been saying this. Obamawams used all fake stuff... birth certificate. Social security number and more. They won't get away with it again. The highest level in Government she can obtain is Senator. Kameltoes is illegitimate VP too. But that entire regime is a scam anyway
Exactly, this will all be exposed .
she's irrelevant so honestly not even worth talking about kind of?
Other then expose her as a RINO.
rules out vivek too...
This I suspect will; head back to SCOTUS as over the years they have twisted this and watered it down from the real intent.
This might be the case but i dont think this has ever been litigated before the Supreme Court such that every situation is clarified.
Most of it can be found in opinion pieces the Founding Fathers had written. It came close to where they almost considered allowing only land owners being able to vote.
Thats how it was in Ancient Rome i believe
I believe you are correct.
Haley is an anchor baby. Her parents moved here and had a baby who grew up to desire to be President.
She may have made it if she had not been a RINO.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/natural_born_citizen#:~:text=Under%20the%2014th%20Amendment%27s%20Naturalization,referred%20to%20as%20birthright%20citizenship.
Here we go. Someone posted this a few days ago and I thought it was very good. https://youtu.be/h9PxdDvgQks?si=atvhwZSnU8RWxzh2
Also the Post & Mail always has the answer. https://www.thepostemail.com/2023/01/30/nikki-haley-is-not-a-natural-born-citizen-of-usa-to-constitutional-standards-not-eligible-to-be-president/
https://www.thepostemail.com/2019/06/25/is-kamala-harris-a-natural-born-citizen/
That’s for minimum citizenship requirement, not presidential requirements which are more. Natural Born is not same as native born.
IMO they got that ruling wrong because foreigners are subject to foreign powers not to US.
Not attacking you, but consider the source.
I followed and spent a lot of time at Legal Insurrection. The guy that runs it, William Jacobson, is a Professor at Cornell. It took me a few years to realize that he's just Controlled Opposition as he beat many of my fellow Birthers on his site over the head with misdirection, refusal to debate and practically pounded his chest that he was the authority on the matter.
("§212. Citizens and natives. - The natives, or Natural-Born Citizens, are those born in the country, of PARENTS who are citizens.")
The Kim Wong Ark case was decided based on the 14th Amendment.
It was not about Article 2 presidential qualifications.