Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

179
()
posted 1 year ago by polish_snausage 1 year ago by polish_snausage +179 / -0
75 comments share
75 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (75)
sorted by:
▲ 39 ▼
– TNBanjoMan 39 points 1 year ago +39 / -0

Sort of what we all knew, in general. The questioner, however, talked about Q as an individual, while I think the Q that we know, that started posting in Oct. 2017, is a team of individuals, possibly 10 in number, most of whom are (or were) military intelligence.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– FractalizingIron 23 points 1 year ago +23 / -0
  • "less than ten" are in the full know, doesn't mean that the Q team itself is that less than ten or what. Perhaps we should avoid confusing the two things.

But the consensus among OG anons is certainly that the posting team was a team and not a single individual.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– 7Nick9 18 points 1 year ago +18 / -0

u/#q60

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– 17JCsCrib26 12 points 1 year ago +12 / -0

Exactly, game theory won't work if everyone involved knows everything.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– sueanon2017 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

yes, definitely a group and not a 'he'

I tune out whenever someone uses that word for Q...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– weholdthesetruths 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

He said 800. Not 10.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– BurnNewHistoryBooks 12 points 1 year ago +12 / -0

800 intel gathering/ special ops forces.

Grabbing servers in Germany was done by more than 10. Raid on the US data centres also multiple fire teams.

800 compartmentalised staff would make sense. Most probably don’t even know they are working for Q / Q++

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ythehorses 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I think the 800 were the members of that Military Intelligence group. Which does not mean they were or knew about Q.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Panzershrekt 9 points 1 year ago +9 / -0

Q comes out of a specific group called the Army of Northern Virginia, which comprises 800 military intelligence specialists who advise the president is what he said.

could be any number between 10 and 800, but 10 of which know the full scope.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– DarQ2light 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

So it's a colonel of Truth in general, definitely sounds military.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Revodude 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

It’s both.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– ZeroDeltaTango 16 points 1 year ago +16 / -0

wiki

In 1980, Vallely co-authored a paper with then military PSYOP analyst Michael Aquino, founder of the Satanist Temple of Set as his commanding officer in the 7th PSYOP Group, titled From PSYOP to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory. MindWar is defined as "the deliberate aggressive convincing of all participants in a war that we will win that war." The paper contrasts a use of psychological operations such as propaganda with a new approach. In a new 2003 introduction of the paper, Aquino notes how it became a widespread subject of conspiracy theories.[5]

His co-authoring of the satanist work is easily independently verified

How the fuck can a man be pro-Satan and pro-Q at the same time?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– weholdthesetruths 22 points 1 year ago +22 / -0

He called it Q anon so maybe he’s just a grifter.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– txharleygirl 12 points 1 year ago +12 / -0

Came here to say the same. No such thing as QAnon.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– weholdthesetruths 19 points 1 year ago +19 / -0

Well to be fair Q was referred to as QANON by OG researchers and newbies for a long time until Q said otherwise. Later still Q finally told people to stop referring to even Q specifically and to just talk about the issues Q raised specifically to keep the masses from outright rejecting anons’ findings due to the media narratives against “QANON.” But there’s no question even the most ardent Q researchers referred to Q as QANON for quite some time. If this recording is old, it may have still been prior to Q saying “there is no QANON. There is Q and the anon researchers” or however Q phrased it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– FractalizingIron 14 points 1 year ago +14 / -0

Well to be fair Q was referred to as QANON by OG researchers and newbies for a long time until Q said otherwise

This is a fact. It's very clear. The term "qanon" as created by the Q movement, but then was hijacked when it became clear that there was infiltration and corruption (aka ":anons" who developed ideas and theories that were NOT from Q but became associated with Q due to disinformation. E.g JFK jr theories, Steinbart, etc.)

So, this is the time line:

a) Q begins dropping, in a manner similar to previously existing 'anons' like FBIanon, Hollywoodanon, etc.

b) Following grows and develops, with the expression "qanon" being widely used to network, connect, and introduce "Q" to wider sphere

c) various characters, ie "anons" began developing ideas, theories, and assertions that were not sourced from Q

d) as the Q movement grew, the media began exploiting these fringe non-Q sourced tangents and streams, directly associating them with Q in order to discredit Q and the movement in general. This was the emergence of the Media creation "Qanon"

e) just prior to the conclusion of the posting phase, after 3 years of dropping, Q draws a clear line between Q and anons, in order to counteract c) and d)

f) addendum: late comers begin to think that any mention of "Qanon" is the corrupt media version, unaware of the legit history of the term, now hijacked and defunct because Q said so.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– AmateurExpert 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

…QANON…

In the X-Men comics “Kwannon” Braddock was named Psy-locke who was also a member of the “fallen angels”

Notable for having fought the apocalypse? Lots of narrative arcs about body swapping and mind control and time travel.

Dunno if connected other than potential from comms being in media, but odd.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– TopKek 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Yeah ngl, I was one of the ones who referred to Q as Qanon way back in the day.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– weholdthesetruths 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

So was I. I distinctly remember when the post came out that gave us all new instructions and why those instructions were given.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– BatteryBaron 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

This recording is back in 2018 or so, before Q called out "QAnon"

u/#q4881

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– weholdthesetruths 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Great catch.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Allergic_to_Blueshit 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0
  1. if Jesus can save, a person can change
  2. who better to know what to combat than someone who has seem behind/inside the darkness.

[Also, not saying I do/ don't believe this dude. Just answering your question]

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Paul_Revere 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

"if Jesus can save, a peed on can change"

I'm guessing this was a typo, but I honestly don't know what you're trying to say, here.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Allergic_to_Blueshit 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Thank you for flagging! My phone aggressively auto corrects to nonsense and I didn't catch it. Thank you, again.

I was responding to the question that someone asked [shortened and paraphrased]:

The person being interviewed in the video .. "...co-authoring of the satanist work is easily independently verified

How the fuck can a man be pro-Satan and pro-Q at the same time?"

So I was saying it is *possible for someone to decades ago be involed in darkness and make their way out (and be pro Q, for example)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– DontTreadOnIT 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Highly relevant, thanks for sharing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– WinstonO1984 13 points 1 year ago +13 / -0

I believe this is from Years Ago?? We need a WAYBACK column.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– BatteryBaron 13 points 1 year ago +13 / -0

Yup, this was posted years ago

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– WinstonO1984 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

Good reminder, and for someone newer...Geeze, Years..Good to see the some of the pieces finally coming together!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– 24-Fan 12 points 1 year ago +12 / -0

Jack Straw posts a lot of Pure Bull Shit. I don't trust Jack Straw.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– FractalizingIron 9 points 1 year ago +9 / -0

Inclined to sympathize. I suspect one can take jack straw with a grain of .... well, straw.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 8 ▼
– BrainwashedbyTrump 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

There's no doubt that Q is military. No doubt. That's precisely why Vice was forced to conclude that Flynn was Q, when infact they didn't have much more than his Q business or something. They couldn't even figure it out 100%. There's a reason why the MSM can't figure it out and why they try to claim guys like the owner of 8chan is Q, which we all know is complete BS.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– BatteryBaron 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

Starlink == the Internet he mentioned here

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– MathDoesntAddUp 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

He said over 800... however, didn't Q say that less than 10 were involved...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Dogsoldier2 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

Q said less than 10 know the full picture. He also said, "Less than ten can confirm me". Operators seldom know everything about a plan. It's called compartmentalization. They are given their mission and they execute it. It's how all large operations are done. The Manhattan Project was a prime example. Thousands of people worked on the project but only a few at the very top knew what the final product would be.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– BurnNewHistoryBooks 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Exactly this.

Pay grades and such like.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MathDoesntAddUp 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I'm aware of that, spending 20 years in the service. But it just seems weird that that wouldn't have been caught.

Perhaps I'm overthinking it. I haven't had my coffee this am.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– DBEMarine 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

"had full picture" that means more are involved but are in compartments and might not know about each other.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0
▲ 8 ▼
– weholdthesetruths 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

Well to be fair Q was referred to as QANON by OG researchers and newbies for a long time until Q said otherwise. Later still Q finally told people to stop referring to even Q specifically and to just talk about the issues Q raised specifically to keep the masses from outright rejecting anons’ findings due to the media narratives against “QANON.” But there’s no question even the most ardent Q researchers referred to Q as QANON for quite some time. If this recording is old, it may have still been prior to Q saying “there is no QANON. There is Q and the anon researchers” or however Q phrased it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– BatteryBaron 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Recorded before this drop:

u/#q4881

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– weholdthesetruths 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Thank you. Confirms what I suspected.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– BatteryBaron 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Ahh, got it. Yea I'm not sure about this jack straw account either

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Revodude 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Exactly. Doesn’t know anymore than we do. Maybe less.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– BeKind39 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Q stated the Q was less than ten people. Q then stated that 6 were military and 3 were civilians. I can not remember which # this was in......sorry.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– artyjulia 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

"You will never guess who you have been talking too"

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– FractalizingIron 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

That's a misquote. Never dropped by Q.

The drop you are thinking of may be

"Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here."

q918

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ythehorses 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I think possibly Q was actually AI using intel from Military Intelligence groups.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– weholdthesetruths 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I’ve believed it’s MI using a Quantum AI with access to Looking Glass tech, unless Looking Glass tech IS quantum AI. I think MI has been given instructions from this AI and a role to play, but ultimately, the reason that “NCSWIC” is because of the Q drops themselves. In looking at all possibly futures simultaneously the AI knew exactly what to post, when, where, and how (right down to typos and explanations of typos) to tip over the right dominoes topple the cabal once and for all. Kinda like Dr. Strange looking at all possibly futures in Infinity War:

Tony: “Any futures where we win?”

Strange: “Not if I tell you.”

Still waiting to see if I’m right :)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– artyjulia 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Yes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Bully_Solution 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

u/#q918

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– ythehorses 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Such a sensible and obvious explanation for Q. Of course.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– SOGWAP 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

What do you think of his use of "Qanon"? That makes me suspicious unless I'm missing something? Any other takes?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– weholdthesetruths 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Not based on the timing of the interview, which was conducted back before Q instructed anons to stop using that term, which had been the common vernacular up until that point.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ythehorses 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

It says this interview was on October 30, 2019.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TheBigGuysSmokingGun 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I feel like Q made it clear they weren’t army of western Virginia….and I feel like this guy is guessing (like the rest of us).

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Fucklibswithcactus 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

My body is ready……….. again

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– slipwave 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

...he should know, he's on the team

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Yanky-Doodle 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Isn’t someone supposed to ask PDJT “who is Q?” Was that in a drop?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– skf93 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Those last few seconds makes it sound like this is from an old interview.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– BatteryBaron 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Oct 18. Will it be 2024 ?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Cathmarcella2 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

He follows me on X...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TaQo 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Real life The Unit

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0460690/

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– TaQo 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

It is...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– TrappedInBlueState 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

What does the 2019 recruitment video have to do with Q?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– PaNix 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Some of yall dont listem well 😅

permalink save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • parallax_crow
  • Fatality
  • BasedCitizen
  • Qanaut
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy