Jersey Futures (@JerseyFutures): "I'm one of a few groups of people who know exactly what the drones are in New Jersey. This tweet will go into the void as I have no followers, but I’ll share anyway. Please retweet for reach." (1/11)
"What you’re seeing are American-made HPGe nuclear detector drones. They can detect the presence of gamma rays miles away. But what is a gamma ray?" (2/11)
"That’d be the stuff we attribute to radiation: electromagnetic waves that penetrate you and cause cancer. HPGe drones are built to inspect nuclear sites... but these ones aren’t." (3/11)
"In the late 2000s, the DoD needed a response to the threat of dirty bombs from ISIS coming into our ports in NY and NJ." (4/11)
"They’ve been stocking up on these drones for a while. Some were deployed to Ukraine when Russia threatened the use of dirty bombs." (5/11)
"They look weird because they’re heavy and have giant Cryocoolers mounted and giant horn antennas to communicate on mmWave frequencies that can’t be jammed." (6/11)
"This is where I come in. The technology these drones use has few suppliers, both for mmWave equipment and the high-purity germanium. The same suppliers that are the backbone of my industry." (7/11)
"So what are they doing? Collecting information on how the public will react (PsyOp) and testing their ability to sweep a port city like NY for dirty bombs." (8/11)
"Jersey was chosen because we’re the closest port city to NY, and NY would be too dense for reliable mmWave comms. But why is the DoD silent?" (9/11)
"Again, because in a scenario where we have a threat of a dirty bomb and the public doesn’t yet know, the DoD needs to know how the public would react if these were deployed to sweep a city." (10/11)
"What many don’t realize is Ukraine is the reason we’re here. That was the first time we deployed them in a combat zone. But make no mistake—they’re for protecting the homeland, as the DoD bought 100s of thousands to act as swarms capable of sweeping a city." (11/11)
"I’m sorry for all the typos. I’m on the train home without my glasses and it’s very bumpy. I just had to get this off my chest as all day I’ve been hearing people genuinely afraid of the drones when they should be in awe of the capabilities we have as a country to keep us safe."
"And for nerds who know a bit about what I’m talking about: take a look at a close-up of the drones. They operate in a grid both to sweep areas and because comms are done in a mesh network operating at 200GHz+, which is very directional and requires bulky horn antennas mounted."
"Should note: I’m not a military expert but spent 1/3 of my career as an RF engineer. We’re only hired in military, telecom, and finance. I’m speculating that this is just a drill."
This is the full thread, with redundant and irrelevant text removed for clarity.
When did Russia threaten 🇺🇦 to use a dirty bomb? Why does it need a dirty bomb to begin with as they have a largest arsenal of nuclear weapons 🤔
This is about the only part that doesn't really scan for me
The "dirty bomb" is the false flag. Prime the world to accept a russian attack. In reality, all uranium sold to Russia through uranium one had samples "skimmed". Similar to fingerprints, uranium can be traced to it's origin. The "government" will link the trace uranium found to a batch sold to russia by U1. War.
You nailed it. That was so they could ff us with nukes and blame Russia back when hillary was supposed to be cheated in.
That is why when the "source" is claiming
Russian threat to use a dirty bomb in Ukraine there are questions about the "source" and the real reasons of the claims 🙄
I am aware of that, that's why I am questioning someone's claim of Russian threat to use a dirty bomb in 🇺🇦 as one of the reasons of the recent drones activities
Not Russia. Ukraine. We don't trust Ukraine not to use one.
Well, they have their DS and are under a threat to be exposed for their shady dealing with Uranium1, etc. But I am confused about a dirty bomb. Logically, they can arrange with their Chinese buddies to send a club K container to our port(s). Not to mention that I really don't recall Russia threatening to use a dirty bomb in Ukraine. I believe it was a concern the other way around
The guy is telling you he's full of shit right there. They can't be jammed, unless you're in NY, where it's too dense (a.k.a. JAMMED) to work? lol. This guy is near something but he does not know what he's talking about completely.
Gamma rays are powerful electromagnetic events. You don't need a swarm you just need altitude.
This is borderline retarded. He either means "200Mbps+" on some other frequency that he does not know, or he's just full of shit.
200Mbps is not a frequency; it is information transmission speed. "Mega bits per second"
200GHz is a frequency.
That's my point. 200GHz is not a frequency that anyone is or would be using in this application. I'm assuming he's confusing these exact two things.
Forget the nuclear weapons - they have oreshnik hypersonic missiles that are better than nukes, with no radiation to worry about. Also, there are currently no ways to defend against them.
Given those facts, any use of nukes or dirty bombs would be obvious false flag attacks attempting to put the blame to Russia.
👍 that's why I question the Russian threat to use a dirty bomb in Ukraine being one of the reasons of the drones drama.
Probably more like the deep state instead of Russia. False flag to escalate the war.
One way I could see this faux pas being excused is if this guy is basically a 'normie' who has little outside knowledge other than the MSM narrative re: Ukraine.
MSM: "Russia May use a dirty bomb."
Normie: "oh yeah remember a while back Russia threatened to use a dirty bomb..."
What he's saying could still be true and is plausibly supported by Q594, 864, 1737
Oddly enough, all three of these Q post #s each add up to 18 🤔
Related.
u/#q594 u/#q864 u/#q1737
Could be. Sum of all fears, etc. And I am very concerned that always drunk and bitter Medvedev who lost his business venues in the states and France due to Trump's sanctions (or EO dated 12.21.2017), recently went to China, probably to plot another cover up of their common dirty dealing with Clintons and Bidens. But there are other questions about this inside. I can't judge the technical part. But I also question his story about glasses. Can happen to anyone. Or can be the case that English is not his 1st language, so he's planting an excuse to prevent something like "sloppy job, mos" reaction. I am grateful that the story was found and shared, but I find it a bit fishy. Q taught us to question everything, right
Did MSM ever even report the possibility of Russia using a dirty bomb? I don't recall hearing anything about it.
That didn't sound right to me either.
Nice find.
“Look what the cat dragged in!”
🐈kek
Do you suppose he had permission to disclose, or he just did so? One drone was had supposedly crashed already.
If he has permission from the right people, the account would likely still be open.
They are called "sniffers". We have helicopters that constantly run sniffing patterns in vulnerable areas. Using drones makes sense because it's cheaper, easier to cover more areas and safer with no pilots involved. Also in the event of crashes they are less to harm people or damage infrastructure.
Was the recent “Chyna bans precious metals”, including germanium, comms / warning to the US?
The mention of germanium triggered my spider senses. It’s use for detecting dirty bombs. Probably just a coincidence.
“The technology these drones use has few suppliers, both for mmWave equipment and the high-purity germanium.”
https://www.lemonde.fr/en/economy/article/2024/12/04/china-bans-the-sale-of-certain-rare-metals-to-the-us_6735174_19.html#:~:text=The%20Chinese%20government%20has%20announced,the%20world's%20two%20leading%20powers.
I have seen a horn antenna and they are not very aerodynamic. That plus mm waves are very small to the point where the horn for a mm wave receiver would not be noticeable.
https://www.miwv.com/wr-2-8-horn-antennas-260-400-ghz/
https://www.miwv.com/drawings/261/261%20(2.8)-25-387_OUTLINE_24041.PDF
I think this guy is full of shit.
Horn receivers are HIGHLY directional. You wouldn't use them in a drone swarm. It would be completely unworkable.
Good point, they would need a very reliable gimbal system and there are better ways to communicate.
Great catch Catsfive!!!
So, there may be something to this. I say "may".
I have a "friend" in a fairly high place that I was chatting with about this subject earlier in the week. To be clear, he has no access, not read in, no awareness of whatever project/initiative is behind these drones. However, he is assuming it's either a DoD or Intel Community initiative given the level of sophistication of these drones.
A quick step back on that subject: -There was a thread on here from the other day with people positing lots of prosaic theories for these drones and to be candid, those people are not paying attention to news and reports. These drones are sophisticated. They have some form of automatic cloaking when cameras are pointed at them within a specific distance and they're very large. Despite their large size, their loiter time has been observed as at least 2-3 hours. No commercial or consumer drone of that size can loiter for that long.
Okay, back to the meat of this post: One of the scenarios he was concerned about is a "broken arrow" situation where there is some kind of unaccounted for nuclear material. He expressed a moderate degree of concern that is what's going on here. He was somewhat dismissive though when I asked if it was a test. He was skeptical that whomever is running this drone op would risk this kind of exposure and citizen upset over a test.
Interestingly, the other theory he mentioned is that these drones could be a response to real UAP's in the area. As some of you know, there is a long history of UFO's/UAP's being seen by citizens and within 5 minutes, there are either military helicopters or military jets on the scene in hot pursuit.
As he put it: "That scenario has happened countless times over the years. There are certain types of UAP's/UFO's the military has deemed as undesirable and they want them chased away, to say nothing of the public exposure when one of those suckers just sits over a town with everyone to see.
So they want to chase them away, but the problem is you've gotta scramble jets or helicopters for that and they need pilots, pilots that may not be quickly available in the middle of the night. So there's some logic in having a drone swarm with high loiter times to do the chasing for you, especially if you can leverage a combination of AI and manual control."
He didn't put a high probability on this scenario, he was more concerned about a Broken Arrow situation, but I know better than to ever dismiss his musings because often they're not actually musings.
The complicating factor in this whole thing is that while drone sightings in the New Jersey Bedminster area have been going on for several months, there have been drone swarm sightings similar to this going on all over the world for a solid year now.
Dolan had a great breakdown around a week and a half ago on how similar drones (in size and capability) have been invading the airspace of multiple RAF bases: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zy4feLBNQq8
Much more than that, as I mentioned these drone incursions have been going on worldwide for over a year. So while it's not impossible, it's difficult to believe that the Bedminster flap isn't somehow related.
You just need another drone. With a net attached below it. Drag the net near the other drone and it tangles itself up into it.
Congratulations. You've now just captured a drone.
This technology already exists.
The statement of mine you're quoting is not in reference to drones. It's in reference to UFOs/UAPs.
The drone swarms seen a few years ago in the northeast Colorado, panhandle of Nebraska and northwestern Kansas may have been a precursor to what we are witnessing now. Better to do preliminary testing in a low population density area first.
u/killerspacerobot
Thanks for the heads-up. Fascinating, if true. Plausible, even if a little odd. That is the quality of a lot of classified activity: not earthshaking, but odd. Answers some questions. It is sideways to the popular themes, which is a stamp of reality.
If this is the explanation, I think there is a reasonable prospect of it being revealed in the future. But what are they looking for? And if this is just a "test," what happens if they unexpectedly find something? Popcorn, please...
Yes, there are radiation detectors designed for use with drones that can help detect dirty bombs. These detectors are lightweight, sensitive, and can identify various types of radiation, including gamma and neutron radiation
Using drones equipped with these detectors offers several advantages: • 20Coverage: Drones can quickly survey large areas, making them efficient for radiation detection.
Safety: They keep operators at a safe distance from potential radiation exposure.
Accessibility: Drones can access difficult or dangerous areas that might be hard for humans to reach
Would you like to know more about how these systems work or their applications?
Asked bing
Maybe the Pentagon is finally taking Superbad's AQ/IS/Taliban threat for a U.S. Homeland attack in 2025 seriously into account. She's only been sounding the alarm for about a year and a half now.
The "swarm" might be what Musk was tweeting which is supposedly coming up
Trump's TS post yesterday re drones posted @ 17:37 EST.
Q1737
u/#q1737
This conflicts with Trump's "Shoot them down"
Ah, but he didn't say "shoot them down".
He said “Let the public know, and now. Otherwise, shoot them down!!!”
Conditional.
Yes when Trump speaks some people will listen. Why would he "call" for this?
Have there been any drone sightings over Yellowstone? You know why I’m asking.
Yes, I believe that they are hunting for WMD/dirty bombs. I believe that the government has credible terrorist intel. Tight lipped so as not to generate panic.
But I know of comm tech that probably makes the comm part incorrect.
I don’t think it is a drill. Mildly concerned that they haven’t found what they are looking for yet.
In '22 Russia was claiming Ukraine was preparing for a dirty bomb event.
bbc
I cannot verify these are in fact the same ones in question, but the flight paths and how the lights make them appear/disappear is interesting: https://www.bitchute.com/video/VkudhBfHNXCc
My theory about the drones is to stir up panic enough so a false flag is way more believable. The last few FF have been ignored. Some thing big is coming like a time square attack during new years. They're going to say that they were acting credible intelligence but were unable to verify the threat. That's why they didn't tell the public. Just a theory.
If they fly them as routine people could know this and not be the least bit bothered. Then the only secret theyed keep from us is when they get a hit on one.
Well, 🐕 my 🐈 That sounds about right to me. If Trump says to shoot them down, though, what do we make of this?
Edit: gammafags popping out of the woodwork to poke holes in the theory 🤷♀️ just wait and see then?
That would be nice if he is correct in his assessment of what these drones are doing. Hopefully he is and we have newer/unused technology that can keep us safe. If he is truthful, it is a shame that our government isn't telling us what is going on.
I imagine this is believable. Would not be surprised at all. Now if they could use these drones to pick up folks during/after a natural disasters, like in NC and SC. Would have been a great opportunity to get people used to drones then without scaring the hell out of the populis.