For investigators to determine whether then-President Biden actually ordered the signature of relevant legal documents, or if he even had the mental capacity to, they must first determine who controlled the autopen and what checks there were in place.
^^^ THIS ^^^ Exactly, this is not something that We The People can simply overlook and ignore. I hope the Trump administration and the full weight of the DOJ examines this matter, especially in light of the "null and void" possibility of every such document hanging in the balance. Just think, the last 4 years could be erased with a series of judicial and criminal decisions! Like a bad dream.
They set the stage perfectly for this. Now, everyone will say, "Well yeah, Joe Biden was in mental decline! Of course someone else was signing stuff for him!" It's illegal, and they will accept it as such, because it's that obvious.
Even though we all have been reading the script for years, I love how the movie is playing out.
Probably not, the precedence would be too severe when applied to all investors. But then again, with the new Sheriff in town, you might see it gain in value.
No, an "auto signature" (a digitally generated signature that automatically appears on a document without manual input) is generally not considered legally valid in most jurisdictions, as it lacks the intent and personal action required for a legal signature; however, depending on the specific circumstances and local laws, a properly implemented electronic signature using a secure system could be considered legally binding.
"This isn't just a scandal; it's potentially the biggest constitutional crisis in American history."
I really do think that is a tactic used by our enemy, to bring on successive crisis of which the next to follow is worse than the former.
There is however one King of Crisis, and all other crisis are designed to distract attention from this baddest of the bad. Want to take a guess at what it is?
Bingo, you got it my educated frens, it's Global Child Sex Trafficking and Abuse. And who is behind most of this? Can you say Small Hat People?
We actually saw him on day one signing EOs in his office, remember? "What am I signing?" Also someone posted (years ago) that the biden signatures varied widely. This headline doesn't make sense to what I've read earlier.
You may be right... on the other hand, I seem to recall that the signature comparison images were not just during his "presidency" but over several years, from mostly when he was in the Senate then through his vice-presidency. The Heritage Foundation story is based only on his signatures when he was purportedly President.
I’ve always thought this.
First step is to look into the staffers surrounding Biden. It should be relatively easy to find the perps. They would, in my opinion, be the most pro far left people that will be bragging about how they signed for the president. Those closest to Biden would be suspect.
I hope this stays front and center and does not get lost in the noise.
I would actually guess that the people who did that would use left wing politics to advance their interests, but might not necessarily believe their own bs.
Whether Trump denounced for optics or not, it would be good to have an org other than the Heritage Foundation (authors Project 2025) conduct this investigation.
Finally! I posted on this a month ago, and posted it to all sorts of people that could do something with it around the same time - influencers, politicians, POTUS/Dan, and several well-known legal people. I even posted how I used GIMP to lift the signatures and place them over the others to prove they were autopen, and some of the pardons with the same signature.
Maybe someone saw it, or at least was thinking like I was and stumbled on it just like I did. Either way - cool. Hopefully it leads to all his stuff being overturned.
It would be really cool if we could see tangible results for stuff we researched and posted on this board (and other places). I saw the same when some of us were researching NED and USAID.
By the way - here is the sig I lifted to compare to the other docs. Catbox won't let me share it as a transparent signature, but it is easy to convert it back.
It is the same one on all of the pardons - I didn't look at all of the other documents.
I don't get this story. What is an autopen? Is it like a stamp? And didn't people witness him signing stuff? Like Trump is having an almost daily signing event with press and witnesses. Did Biden sign everything in secret?
The Department of Justice and SCOTUS agreed in 2005 that it's ok for the President to use an Autopen to sign bills. Bush Jr. requested a full review of all of Clinton's signed bills when he found out an Autopen was used. A few dozen very Republican legal scholars agreed that an autopen was fine.
My question is, who is drafting some of the more obscure executive orders that Trump signs? Beyond signing, does the president not have to compose the whole executive order? Seems like he should. There shouldn't be other people writing executive orders and then have them put in front of the president to sign.
There are some that believe that sleepy Joe was a mask wearing actor controlled by the white hats. We are told to "enjoy the show". Maybe this is part of the show. This theory would explain why Joe didn't cancel many of the EO that DJT put in place during his first term.
Usurpation of Executive Authority must be an overthrow of legitimately constituted power. A coup.
The burden of proof is on those who assert the signatures were authorized. And authorization needs to be in written form, with autograph.
This could make Trump the 46th president de facto. Biden was just a blank spot in the historical record. Do these "documents" include treaties? Possible foreign influence?
For investigators to determine whether then-President Biden actually ordered the signature of relevant legal documents, or if he even had the mental capacity to, they must first determine who controlled the autopen and what checks there were in place.
^^^ THIS ^^^ Exactly, this is not something that We The People can simply overlook and ignore. I hope the Trump administration and the full weight of the DOJ examines this matter, especially in light of the "null and void" possibility of every such document hanging in the balance. Just think, the last 4 years could be erased with a series of judicial and criminal decisions! Like a bad dream.
Follow the pen !
Most underrated comment of the thread
Indeed.
They set the stage perfectly for this. Now, everyone will say, "Well yeah, Joe Biden was in mental decline! Of course someone else was signing stuff for him!" It's illegal, and they will accept it as such, because it's that obvious.
Even though we all have been reading the script for years, I love how the movie is playing out.
Maybe catanji Jackson Brown can go away now. That way Trump gets a redo. Cuz coney barret is a stupid jesuit whore.
https://revolver.news/2025/03/joe-biden-signature-autopen-scandal-could-change-everything/
this comment should be stickied
Timely comment, and from Q at that!
Yes! 👏
Thank you for the "holy shit" light bulb moment of the day. Well done!
Will it replace the 33% loss in my 401k I took in the first 60 days of the biden shitshow
Probably not, the precedence would be too severe when applied to all investors. But then again, with the new Sheriff in town, you might see it gain in value.
No, an "auto signature" (a digitally generated signature that automatically appears on a document without manual input) is generally not considered legally valid in most jurisdictions, as it lacks the intent and personal action required for a legal signature; however, depending on the specific circumstances and local laws, a properly implemented electronic signature using a secure system could be considered legally binding.
Here’s an old post where Speaker Johnson recounts a meeting with Biden that made it clear Biden had no idea what he was signing.
https://greatawakening.win/p/19AK6CE5AZ/speaker-mike-johnson-not-only-co/c/
Get rid of the fake pardons!
So the last 4 years were one giant RICO indictment?
That would be nice
That would be AMAZING... and I'm running out of popcorn!
indictment.
Error corrected. Thank you my good Fren.
EXACTLY.
Americans can not just let this GO...
"This isn't just a scandal; it's potentially the biggest constitutional crisis in American history."
I really do think that is a tactic used by our enemy, to bring on successive crisis of which the next to follow is worse than the former.
There is however one King of Crisis, and all other crisis are designed to distract attention from this baddest of the bad. Want to take a guess at what it is?
Bingo, you got it my educated frens, it's Global Child Sex Trafficking and Abuse. And who is behind most of this? Can you say Small Hat People?
Their fiefdom was founded by and is run by the Rothschilds. The Rothschilds serve the Crown. The Crown serves....
smolhat!
If he was too senile to be charged per a Judge you are too senile to be President.
Imagine if that statement was made about Trump. They would 24/7 be out there saying he needs to step down.
Does this include the renewals of Trumps EO's about election interference and human trafficking?
EO 13848
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/09/11/2024-20800/continuation-of-the-national-emergency-with-respect-to-foreign-interference-in-or-undermining-public#:~:text=September%209%2C%202024-,Continuation%20of%20the%20National%20Emergency%20With%20Respect%20to%20Foreign%20Interference,Economic%20Powers%20Act%20(50%20U.S.C.
which one?
Biden's letter withdrawing from the 2024 presidential race... that seems to be the ONLY document with a signature that wasn't auto-pen signed.
interesting
We actually saw him on day one signing EOs in his office, remember? "What am I signing?" Also someone posted (years ago) that the biden signatures varied widely. This headline doesn't make sense to what I've read earlier.
You may be right... on the other hand, I seem to recall that the signature comparison images were not just during his "presidency" but over several years, from mostly when he was in the Senate then through his vice-presidency. The Heritage Foundation story is based only on his signatures when he was purportedly President.
What about the pardons? Also auto-penned??
I’ve always thought this. First step is to look into the staffers surrounding Biden. It should be relatively easy to find the perps. They would, in my opinion, be the most pro far left people that will be bragging about how they signed for the president. Those closest to Biden would be suspect. I hope this stays front and center and does not get lost in the noise.
I vote 'Jake Sullivan'.
I would actually guess that the people who did that would use left wing politics to advance their interests, but might not necessarily believe their own bs.
This is why President Trump makes a great show of hand signing each and every EO in front of witnesses and usually in front of cameras.
Whether Trump denounced for optics or not, it would be good to have an org other than the Heritage Foundation (authors Project 2025) conduct this investigation.
What happens to the DEI supreme court hire, Ketanji?
Maybe she will get a role on Broadway
Then that would not be legal and everything signed by auto is should be void.
Remember when he would sign an EO and hold up a blank leather bound paper?
YES!! Craziness
Check for Joe Biden's fingerprints on the documents.
If no fingerprints are on the "signed" orders... how do we know that Biden even READ the orders he supposedly signed?
This is the reason that Trump signed all documents in front of an audience with a big, fat Sharpie!
Many here called this out all along.
Finally! I posted on this a month ago, and posted it to all sorts of people that could do something with it around the same time - influencers, politicians, POTUS/Dan, and several well-known legal people. I even posted how I used GIMP to lift the signatures and place them over the others to prove they were autopen, and some of the pardons with the same signature.
Maybe someone saw it, or at least was thinking like I was and stumbled on it just like I did. Either way - cool. Hopefully it leads to all his stuff being overturned.
It would be really cool if we could see tangible results for stuff we researched and posted on this board (and other places). I saw the same when some of us were researching NED and USAID.
https://greatawakening.win/p/19AKB0oAGO/guess-what-i-found--the-j6-commi/c/
By the way - here is the sig I lifted to compare to the other docs. Catbox won't let me share it as a transparent signature, but it is easy to convert it back.
It is the same one on all of the pardons - I didn't look at all of the other documents.
https://files.catbox.moe/m631h8.png
Can someone with more wrinkles in their brain explain this? The actor signed lots of executive orders on TV.
Was there power of attorney health care documentation in place?
I don't get this story. What is an autopen? Is it like a stamp? And didn't people witness him signing stuff? Like Trump is having an almost daily signing event with press and witnesses. Did Biden sign everything in secret?
Shocked! I'm shocked I tell ya! Honestly - is anyone surprised by this?
Signed -J03 E1den.
Something something fraud vitiates everything
So the pardons can be reversed! Great
The Department of Justice and SCOTUS agreed in 2005 that it's ok for the President to use an Autopen to sign bills. Bush Jr. requested a full review of all of Clinton's signed bills when he found out an Autopen was used. A few dozen very Republican legal scholars agreed that an autopen was fine.
https://www.justice.gov/olc/opinion/whether-president-may-sign-bill-directing-his-signature-be-affixed-it#:~:text=Rather%2C%20the%20President%20may%20sign,bill%2C%20for%20example%20by%20autopen.
"...The President May sign a bill...by directing a subordinate to affix the President's signature..."
This isn't carte blanche.
No one said it was
I was not aware of this. Thanks for raising it. Scary still.
Show for the normies who cant digest fraud vitiates everything.
"Follow the pen."
Yes and hopefully following Biden’s military trial, and execution…. And more to FOLLOW
What was that one document?
My question is, who is drafting some of the more obscure executive orders that Trump signs? Beyond signing, does the president not have to compose the whole executive order? Seems like he should. There shouldn't be other people writing executive orders and then have them put in front of the president to sign.
There are some that believe that sleepy Joe was a mask wearing actor controlled by the white hats. We are told to "enjoy the show". Maybe this is part of the show. This theory would explain why Joe didn't cancel many of the EO that DJT put in place during his first term.
Usurpation of Executive Authority must be an overthrow of legitimately constituted power. A coup.
The burden of proof is on those who assert the signatures were authorized. And authorization needs to be in written form, with autograph.
This could make Trump the 46th president de facto. Biden was just a blank spot in the historical record. Do these "documents" include treaties? Possible foreign influence?