My bs meter is going off, zero evidence. Zero sauce. Insane hopium with nothing to show for it. He is a scammer! Let me guess, you gotta buy his stuff to learn how to get your slice of the pie?! Liar!!
It is well known that the Fed owns vast amounts of land which have minerals. This isn't unknown or surprising. People in this thread have already suggested exploiting or leasing these resources without knowing that these were the same resources the lawyer was talking about.
Yes this is the second time in a week or so that I can say this is a stupid thread. Of course there are trillions of dollars of untapped mineral resources. WTF
I've long thought part of the game was to extract anything useful and rare from other countries first as a matter of policy. That way we had plenty if we ever needed them. ie, they're strategic reserve.
Some thoughts about Rickards on how Pres. DJT could bring about new wealth.
The federal government owns a lot of land that it should not, unconstitutional. They get forts and dockyards. Buried in the land that they took anyways is a lot of gold, silver, platinum group metals, other strategic minerals. It needs to be mined.
If a lot of the land gets sold, or leased to mining companies and oil drillers, then more money flows to D.C. and as DOGE eliminates a lot of the corruption, the sovereign wealth fund can be created, like Norway’s.
This is one leg of the MAGA economy plan, like 1 of 3 or 4 legs of a solid oak table.
The other legs include 2) bringing back jobs and manufacturing with the AI / robot technology, 3) education going back to basics with vocational training and reduced-cost online colleges, and 4) revitalized spirit as Reagan tried to bring back after the
Vietnam and Jimmy Carter years except Bush ruined it — no Bushes to ruin it this time!
Lol yeah because we’re roped into tiny corridors along interstates dude. Have you been west of the Mississippi? I always laugh at overpopulationists when I make the drive from Utah to California. Or really from Salt Lake City to anywhere in any direction. We have so much land that if we wanted to, we could each have 100 acres and never have to see anyone else ever again. There’s seriously that much untouched land in the western states.
Exactly! One thing that I really hate is farmland or untouched land being sold to developers that build cookie-cutter houses 10 feet apart. More city people moving out to the country to tell others what they can and cannot do. 😡😡😡🤬
Ask any developer worth his salt and he will tell you that most land is uninhabitable because of one thing...water. Unless you can get a certain amount of water to the area, it's a non-starter. There's probable tech that's solved this problem in a cost effective, efficient manner, but until that is allowed to actually go mainstream...welcome to the desert!
I kind of hate it too but the federal government has been overzealous in its acquisition of private lands, and I think a lot of those tracts have some of the most beneficial minerals available anywhere. It's the one world government trying to keep us from benefiting from our own natural resources. CONTROL.
Jim Rickards is a lawyer, economist, and bestselling author who has advised the U.S. Treasury, CIA, and Pentagon on strategic threats and economic policy. He has participated in top-level financial war games and served as general counsel during the Long-Term Capital Management crisis. His books include Currency Wars, The Road to Ruin, and The Death of Money.
Hey now! The Ventura is a perfectly acceptable although uncommon men's hairstyle. It's been rocked by many noteworthy dudes including but not limited to Betelguise, Hulkster, Maynard, and the Tales from the Crypt Keeper!
possibly another meaning, but Q also leaves out “the” elsewhere where in context the Federal Reserve is the clear meaning: “ [Use FED to inc rates to counter growth and project POTUS blame]”
If you look into this he is talking about the Federal Government's mineral reserves. The proper steps would be to invest in mineral extraction companies before Trump does this.
Wealth is not the number of digits in your fiat currency account. It is your ability to afford the things you need and want. Which means, there needs to be an abundance of those things. It comes down to productivity per person and trading with other countries that is advantageous to us. So, unless this 150T is in natural resources and materials we can export, it's BS.
not to be a wet blanket, but there's a lot of pie-in-the-sky promises here with very little substance to back it up. I'm not saying he's lying, I'm saying there's very little meat on these bones...
I would not have brought it here if I have not known this particular person. He has been very knowledgeable but ok, if pie-in-sky, then that's the way you feel.
How is this any different from just printing $170 trillion? Does the current value of the dollar already take into account this trust? I'm not trying to be an asshole. I'm just trying to figure out how this makes sense and what it would do to the economy to suddenly have that much currency added to our economy.
Edit: Ok, I guess it would depend on who controlled the money and how it was spent. If it was spent to pay off the debt and rebuild the country, we could avoid hyperinflation. If it was dumped on the economy to be spent like crazy, it would destroy the value of the dollar. Very interesting.
Wouldn't this be great, if true. We all (in America and Americans) could surely use some extra funds. Of course pay the debt off first then use the "extra" money for Americans.
My bs meter is going off, zero evidence. Zero sauce. Insane hopium with nothing to show for it. He is a scammer! Let me guess, you gotta buy his stuff to learn how to get your slice of the pie?! Liar!!
Actually if you look into this, Jim Rickards is just talking about the US mineral field assets that the federal government owns:
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/04/20/3064451/0/en/Built-for-a-Crisis-Jim-Rickards-Reveals-the-Hidden-National-Resource-Created-for-America-s-Worst-Case-Scenario.html
It is well known that the Fed owns vast amounts of land which have minerals. This isn't unknown or surprising. People in this thread have already suggested exploiting or leasing these resources without knowing that these were the same resources the lawyer was talking about.
Yes this is the second time in a week or so that I can say this is a stupid thread. Of course there are trillions of dollars of untapped mineral resources. WTF
I've long thought part of the game was to extract anything useful and rare from other countries first as a matter of policy. That way we had plenty if we ever needed them. ie, they're strategic reserve.
I never bought anything from him but I learn to buy precious metals. Does that count?
Some thoughts about Rickards on how Pres. DJT could bring about new wealth.
The federal government owns a lot of land that it should not, unconstitutional. They get forts and dockyards. Buried in the land that they took anyways is a lot of gold, silver, platinum group metals, other strategic minerals. It needs to be mined.
If a lot of the land gets sold, or leased to mining companies and oil drillers, then more money flows to D.C. and as DOGE eliminates a lot of the corruption, the sovereign wealth fund can be created, like Norway’s.
This is one leg of the MAGA economy plan, like 1 of 3 or 4 legs of a solid oak table.
The other legs include 2) bringing back jobs and manufacturing with the AI / robot technology, 3) education going back to basics with vocational training and reduced-cost online colleges, and 4) revitalized spirit as Reagan tried to bring back after the Vietnam and Jimmy Carter years except Bush ruined it — no Bushes to ruin it this time!
Gold shall destroy the fed! u/#q2619
Lol yeah because we’re roped into tiny corridors along interstates dude. Have you been west of the Mississippi? I always laugh at overpopulationists when I make the drive from Utah to California. Or really from Salt Lake City to anywhere in any direction. We have so much land that if we wanted to, we could each have 100 acres and never have to see anyone else ever again. There’s seriously that much untouched land in the western states.
Exactly! One thing that I really hate is farmland or untouched land being sold to developers that build cookie-cutter houses 10 feet apart. More city people moving out to the country to tell others what they can and cannot do. 😡😡😡🤬
Black Lives Matter owns that much land?! Oh wait... Bureau of Land Management.
So like, the desert? There's a reason it's mostly uninhabited.
And what about all the land we aren't allowed to see like in the Grand Canyon and so many National forests.
I feel the same way about over population.
Ask any developer worth his salt and he will tell you that most land is uninhabitable because of one thing...water. Unless you can get a certain amount of water to the area, it's a non-starter. There's probable tech that's solved this problem in a cost effective, efficient manner, but until that is allowed to actually go mainstream...welcome to the desert!
I kind of hate it too but the federal government has been overzealous in its acquisition of private lands, and I think a lot of those tracts have some of the most beneficial minerals available anywhere. It's the one world government trying to keep us from benefiting from our own natural resources. CONTROL.
I agree with you- lease, and not give away especially not to corporations or foreigners
I think you're on to something fren: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/04/20/3064466/0/en/Former-CIA-Advisor-Reveals-the-Domestic-Supply-Chain-Hidden-Beneath-U-S-Soil.html
So, not just some random dude with bad hair
Yeah funny you mention the hair...
Started looking into his bio and saw he's been rocking the bald mullet thing for decades... and was like, "oh okay... well at least he's consistent"
😆😆😆
Hey now! The Ventura is a perfectly acceptable although uncommon men's hairstyle. It's been rocked by many noteworthy dudes including but not limited to Betelguise, Hulkster, Maynard, and the Tales from the Crypt Keeper!
LOL I'd have thought a style called the Ventura would be oversized, ridiculous, wavy, and kinda swoopy ;p
Well, it actually was after his gubernatorial career leading into that goofy Conspiracy Theory show he hosted.
Now it's looking more like this finance dudes style. Faded but hanging on!
He's a non-random dude with bad hair.
thank fren, I’ll review this link next
💥💥💥
Yes but Q2619 says "Gold shall destroy FED."
Not "the [F]ed."
Anons have speculated a number of things FED could stand for - I don't recall them now
possibly another meaning, but Q also leaves out “the” elsewhere where in context the Federal Reserve is the clear meaning: “ [Use FED to inc rates to counter growth and project POTUS blame]”
u/#q2658
Federal Economic Dominance?
I have been told there's a lot of precious metals here too. I think oils and gold. The other is manufacturing like you said.
It will be interesting being part of GAW to see how things come about!
Yes, the next 10 years will be interesting to watch.
I have never heard of this trust but Jim Rickards well known in the Finance community.
I saw this post...very dasting! ✨
Definitely interesting.
If you take the Proper Steps?
Just watch this short 30 min. video.... Kek
Hahaha. "If you haven't received $6000, the government has been lying to you."
Just buy his shit and you will be a trillion tomorrow! No returns!
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/04/20/3064451/0/en/Built-for-a-Crisis-Jim-Rickards-Reveals-the-Hidden-National-Resource-Created-for-America-s-Worst-Case-Scenario.html
If you look into this he is talking about the Federal Government's mineral reserves. The proper steps would be to invest in mineral extraction companies before Trump does this.
Want to ask Brain_Dead here? I will tell you what the proper steps are:
Howls.
If you thought inflation was bad before....
A $2 loaf of bread would be $50 if everyone is a millionaire etc
Yep. This was the ridiculousness of Gesara/Nesara. Nobody willing to bake the bread.
I don't believe that's the Plan making all taxes payers millionaires, because know would want or need to work for most part.
It could be bad for a while.
Wealth is not the number of digits in your fiat currency account. It is your ability to afford the things you need and want. Which means, there needs to be an abundance of those things. It comes down to productivity per person and trading with other countries that is advantageous to us. So, unless this 150T is in natural resources and materials we can export, it's BS.
Globalists hate this 1 weird trick to unlimited wealth, just listen to my 10 minute video and subscribe to learn how.
Is it that St.Germaine trust fund?
You asked the wrong person. I don't know. Sorry.
It isn't a trust fund at all. It is only the fact that there are lots of minerals underground on Federal land.
not to be a wet blanket, but there's a lot of pie-in-the-sky promises here with very little substance to back it up. I'm not saying he's lying, I'm saying there's very little meat on these bones...
I would not have brought it here if I have not known this particular person. He has been very knowledgeable but ok, if pie-in-sky, then that's the way you feel.
I mean no disrespect, and I'm not saying he's wrong, I just want to see receipts is all.
I understand you're familiar enough with him to trust him, but i'm not is all.
I understand.
I'll be happy when i'm not learning about the future from the news anymore.
Rather learn it from God
Question...am I the only one seeing a bald cap being worn? I don't know this person, but that was the very first thing I saw during the video.
He has strange hair.
So about $460,000 per person
What would be the surplus returns over what has been contributed to Social security vs what is disbursed?
About.
How is this any different from just printing $170 trillion? Does the current value of the dollar already take into account this trust? I'm not trying to be an asshole. I'm just trying to figure out how this makes sense and what it would do to the economy to suddenly have that much currency added to our economy.
Edit: Ok, I guess it would depend on who controlled the money and how it was spent. If it was spent to pay off the debt and rebuild the country, we could avoid hyperinflation. If it was dumped on the economy to be spent like crazy, it would destroy the value of the dollar. Very interesting.
Dear fren, I am just a brain-dead. I would not know. LOL
Tabloid level promises.
LOL
Wouldn't this be great, if true. We all (in America and Americans) could surely use some extra funds. Of course pay the debt off first then use the "extra" money for Americans.
It would be.
Some weirdo said something to a camera! Guys!! This is IT
Actually Jim Rickards got some good info. Not Jim Cramer, you know. LOL
This wouldn't have anything to do with Benjamin Fulford and the Dragon families and all that, does it?
I have no clue. I am just a brain-dead, but Jim Rickards is quite well known in the financial arena.
James Madison stole a checkbook from lord Rothschild in 1819.
Oh, I got it. Thanks.
Hmm https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/crime-1873.asp
https://issuu.com/patriotcorps/docs/issue_31
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comstock_Act_of_1873
https://www.congress.gov/bill/42nd-congress/house-bill/4011
http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amlaw/index.html
Amazing info. Truly thank you for all this.
There is zero chance that the US Government would give citizens enough money to be life changing. The Gov wants us where we are. In chains.
Cannot agree more except for this administration.