Yes, he certainly said that 'we were right', but he also said - over and over and over again - that the anti-vaxxers are 'the winners'. Then he continued, saying 'You won, you won, you won - completely'. He said we should take the 'victory', and him the 'defeat'.
That language is unambiguously describing two 'teams' -- 'us vs them' - 'the anti-vaxxers vs the pro-vaxxers'.
It misses the much much larger issue -- that a global cabal tried to kill all of us.
Nothing he said mentioned the 'third team' -- the killing team.
I read all your comments ! You’re correct correct correct ! I’ve never listened to Scott, only know of him from here , people calling him clott adams etc . I listened to this video and it was weird . I especially thought his constant remark about us not trusting big company’s and goverment was the reason we didn’t take the jab . Yes that's part of it , but there’s so much more to the overall reason ! As I said I don’t know how he speaks on his videos, but I thought this was really weird . Anti vaxxer s , yes , I guess u can call us that . How about calling us people who are able to think for ourselves and make decisions using basic elementary level right and wrong thinking . It’s not just being anti vaxxer , you’re correct he is clueless as to what really happened . ! To me this appears to be a very strange guy , half ass admitting he was wrong , but went about it in a very strange way ! Perhaps he just wants more followers . Yes, I’m glad he said what he said to those defending him . I’m glad he came out and somewhat said taking the jab was a bad decision , but he said it in a very strange way !
and you are correct, mate, not trusting big companies had nothing to do with me not taking the clot shot, being awakened years before made me realise what shit was being spouted.
Unfortunately, Adams won't take ivermectin(I hope he will, I bear no animosity to him), but they invest too much of their egos into their opinions.
He said he's tried it and its not working for him. It's strange that both him and his ex-wife got cancer.
I'll put my tin foil hat on and say the clowns used their special treatment to give it to them both.
Scott Adams is so damn wierd and cringe. I hope he gets better but if you were around during the time when he was shitting all over anti-vaxxers you'll know why he's being like he is in this video. He is probably responsible for untold thousands of on-the-fence MAGA who ended up taking the vax thanks to him, and he strengthened the mandate against anti-vaxxers and helped us all get banned for it.
I tend to agree with you. He's intentionally shifting the 'awakening narrative' from 'they tried to kill us' into 'which half of the population guessed right'.
And the words he chooses to describe HOW we were 'right' really pisses me off. He acts as if we were acting on pure emotion.
We didn't 'guess', and he didn't 'analyze'.
WE were the ones who actually analyzed. He just parroted the company line.
And now, as his final act - he wants to imply that we just 'got lucky'.
I think where he is still coping hard is his claim that people declined the vax based on distrust of government and big pharma.
The data required to make this decision was all there plain as day, but somehow his "fancy analysis" missed it. Mine did not.
Yes, the government lied, but what else is new. They also published the data showing the vax was dangerous, but I guess he didn't include that in his "analytics".
He's framing this as if he's taking the moral high road as the civil and rational intellectual stooping down to give credit to us crude dogmatists who got lucky.
In other words, the Zulus with their spears just defeated the British with their gunpowder.
You'll find that people who consider themselves the most analytical, logical, and emotionally detached will still cling to a bias in a way that is emotional, stubborn, and irrational, despite believing themselves to be above those impulses. Adams did that with the mRNA drugs, and now he's framing his concession as if our dogma (the reflexive distrust of government) achieved a rare victory over academics, so he wants us to have our tribal campfire celebrations and honor our mythical gods.
Unfortunately, he insists that anti-vaxxers only won because they beat a coin toss.
He insists there was no way anyone could have predicted that the pharmaceutical industry was full of large, unscrupulous companies full of psychopath leadership with no morals.
Which is odd, because his entire claim to fame (the Dilbert cartoon), was an exercise in mocking large unscrupulous companies full of psychopath leadership with no morals.
What he is doing, he would call "pace and leading". He's a hypnotist, and he would describe pace-and-leading as matching the energy and echoing back the thoughts to a group you intend to influence, so that they accept you as an expert and someone they trust.
He's called Elon's DOGE savings isn't real. He's also called Trump's tariff process corrupt.
Even now, nearly on his death bed, he's still shilling for cabal interests and declaring himself wrong on the jab to gain lost audience back.
This statement was full of conversational hypnosis. NLP. Probably to insert himself and steer the narrative that’s coming about adverse reactions. 5GW is mostly a narrative war. A war of liars and false choices.
He got famous writing a cartoon about soulless corporate bureaucracy then trusts that same system to modify his DNA?
Bingo. Also he flipped on all sorts of things right after he met with Trump.
Also he married a instagram model right after that, supposedly.
A hypnotist trained in persuasion who makes his living writing the comic you mention would only be very direct with people, though. Kek.
I’m always surprised how many people take Adams at face value. He seems to be on our side, but that doesn’t mean anyone can trust a single thing he says. At some point, he is going to to be a disclosure operation(s). Guessing this is one of them. No way he met with Trump personally and didn’t get a script.
We still have a lot of work to do on critical thinking and narrative analysis. Guessing not enough people followed Defected. Anyone who didn’t, go back. It’s worth it. https://rumble.com/playlists/Hdp1AQdJ7JI
Starting in the 1980's I labored for ten years in "cube-ville" and enjoyed Mr. Adams' "Dilbert" musings.
Him saying "I (Uncle_Fester) won" is a hollow victory.
Taken further, he is acknowledging what the future holds. A greater proportion of the populace will be pure bloods. It was a genetic event as significant as the evolution of Homo Sapiens 300,000 years ago.
Covid-19 was not just a bio-weapon. It was an intelligence test.
Intelligence has absolutely nothing to do with compliance.
You could have an IQ of 200 and be easily pressured into compliance or an IQ of 80 and be an ornery fuck who never complies with anything on principle.
Please let's stop confusing "smart" with all other virtues and vices.
Not sure this is true. There was plenty of information available for those willing to inform themselves. The intelligent course was to do that, not believe what the nice people on TV or the "experts" had to say. I have some otherwise very intelligent capable friends who failed the test - even with me informing them. Maybe not so intelligent, after all.
Exactly. And I would even take it a step further; There were plenty of unknowns. It was always retarded to take a vaccine with so many unknowns. Take with that that RNA-virusses mutate very very quickly (vaccine can not be effective) and if it could even impart any immunity, that immunity would need to be in the airways and not anywhere else (vaccine would be ineffective).
We knew all this from March 2020 onward. It was enough to at least wait it out when it came to the vaccine. Soon after enough information was available to know that the quality control on mRNA is difficult and large-scale production would result in mRNA chains of unknown length. We knew about DNA-contamination. We expected transcription of the mRNA into the DNA (how else does human DNA have large quantities of DNA of viral origin in it?).
Etc.
He could have known it all had he postponed knee-jerk judgment and actually looked at the information and heard from experts who did not just push the narrative.
There is infinite information on everything, available from an unprocessessible amount of sources.
The question isn't about availability, it's about trust and correctly judging which sources of information to trust.
Trusting those institutions which were created to safeguard information integrity isn't a sign of low intelligence, but more like a lack of experience with having your trust broken
We all lose when fellow citizens die because they were lied to. There are no winners and losers. Just murderers, stupid people who believe them and smart people who don't. The smart and the stupid people are on the same team. I take no victory in learning that innocent people will die. It certainly feels nice to be one of the smart ones though.
While I'm not his shrink, and I'm not qualified to make a diagnosis, yesterday's tweet strongly suggests that Adams, whose work on Dilbert I absolutely adore, is a vulnerable narcissist.
People who suffer from NPD only ever see Life as a zero-sum game, as he's clearly doing here.
Had he simply said, I have the same cancer as Biden, I'm not expected to live past the summer, and my wife and I covet your prayers, that would have been admirable.
Instead, his felt need to imply that we, the Unvaccinated, have somehow won at the expense of his life? Yeah. That's narcissistic AF.
I didn't use an heuristic of not trusting the government, I used my, better, careful analysis of the data and the facts. The fact is there is a deep state, they are evil, and there is ample data to prove it. You only need to look at false flags in the past where government embedded forces KILLED WILLINGLY. Then, in the teeth of a CLEARLY FAKE pandemic with a sudden, blind you with science, vaccine, all analysts of truly open mind would KNOW FOR 100% CERTAIN it is a trap. After all, every other vaccine is a FRAUD, so of course this one is too, and was being offered by MURDERERS with the excuse of a clear lie.
There is no heuristic here. Sure, at the foothills of the bell curve, some might have used dumb heuristics "Duh guvermint bad". But we are not that. We are the mages of enlightenment at the thin nose of the bell curve, prayerfully and stoically bearing the unbearable pressure of living in a cursed and evil-controlled regime, and unable to reach those behind us on the curve. Our burden is UNENDING.
We have not won, but failed, but at least we survived. But we survive to live some more in a terrible and threatening world where power remains focussed on our destruction. Our burden is another type of burden, the burden of the silent scream, while the rest of the world trudges on in blissful ignorance, hating us for being smarter, not understanding we marshal our talents to free those still trapped in lies.
He still doesn't get it.
We didn't 'beat you', you dipshit. We stayed alive.
The enemy is not 'each other', the enemy are 'those who tried to kill us'.
He didn't say that, he said we were right, happy and healthy and people that took the vax are not
Yes, he certainly said that 'we were right', but he also said - over and over and over again - that the anti-vaxxers are 'the winners'. Then he continued, saying 'You won, you won, you won - completely'. He said we should take the 'victory', and him the 'defeat'.
That language is unambiguously describing two 'teams' -- 'us vs them' - 'the anti-vaxxers vs the pro-vaxxers'.
It misses the much much larger issue -- that a global cabal tried to kill all of us.
Nothing he said mentioned the 'third team' -- the killing team.
He still doesn't get it.
How many other people that were provax have come out and humbly admitted they were wrong?
When someone starts swallowing red pills, encourage them, don't criticize them.
Most people out there will never admit they were wrong. Kudos for him doing that. He certainly didn't have to.
I agree with your sentiment -- but one of the reasons that the world is in such sad shape is that most people don't understand who the real enemy is.
So, yes - kudos for his humility -- but the way he framed it perpetuates the 'us vs them' mentality.
I read all your comments ! You’re correct correct correct ! I’ve never listened to Scott, only know of him from here , people calling him clott adams etc . I listened to this video and it was weird . I especially thought his constant remark about us not trusting big company’s and goverment was the reason we didn’t take the jab . Yes that's part of it , but there’s so much more to the overall reason ! As I said I don’t know how he speaks on his videos, but I thought this was really weird . Anti vaxxer s , yes , I guess u can call us that . How about calling us people who are able to think for ourselves and make decisions using basic elementary level right and wrong thinking . It’s not just being anti vaxxer , you’re correct he is clueless as to what really happened . ! To me this appears to be a very strange guy , half ass admitting he was wrong , but went about it in a very strange way ! Perhaps he just wants more followers . Yes, I’m glad he said what he said to those defending him . I’m glad he came out and somewhat said taking the jab was a bad decision , but he said it in a very strange way !
We are Pattern Recognitionists.
Perhaps we have a tiny bit of autism in us.
and you are correct, mate, not trusting big companies had nothing to do with me not taking the clot shot, being awakened years before made me realise what shit was being spouted. Unfortunately, Adams won't take ivermectin(I hope he will, I bear no animosity to him), but they invest too much of their egos into their opinions.
He said he's tried it and its not working for him. It's strange that both him and his ex-wife got cancer. I'll put my tin foil hat on and say the clowns used their special treatment to give it to them both.
Scott Adams is so damn wierd and cringe. I hope he gets better but if you were around during the time when he was shitting all over anti-vaxxers you'll know why he's being like he is in this video. He is probably responsible for untold thousands of on-the-fence MAGA who ended up taking the vax thanks to him, and he strengthened the mandate against anti-vaxxers and helped us all get banned for it.
He does get it. Which is why the statement is even more disingenuous. It’s a divisive statement. This is a prize one of us want to win.
I tend to agree with you. He's intentionally shifting the 'awakening narrative' from 'they tried to kill us' into 'which half of the population guessed right'.
And the words he chooses to describe HOW we were 'right' really pisses me off. He acts as if we were acting on pure emotion.
We didn't 'guess', and he didn't 'analyze'.
WE were the ones who actually analyzed. He just parroted the company line.
And now, as his final act - he wants to imply that we just 'got lucky'.
Still a normie like so many others like Tim Pool
once you start naming "who is responsible for covid and the vaccines" you become anti Semitic very quickly. slippery slope!!
I think where he is still coping hard is his claim that people declined the vax based on distrust of government and big pharma.
The data required to make this decision was all there plain as day, but somehow his "fancy analysis" missed it. Mine did not.
Yes, the government lied, but what else is new. They also published the data showing the vax was dangerous, but I guess he didn't include that in his "analytics".
He's framing this as if he's taking the moral high road as the civil and rational intellectual stooping down to give credit to us crude dogmatists who got lucky.
In other words, the Zulus with their spears just defeated the British with their gunpowder.
You'll find that people who consider themselves the most analytical, logical, and emotionally detached will still cling to a bias in a way that is emotional, stubborn, and irrational, despite believing themselves to be above those impulses. Adams did that with the mRNA drugs, and now he's framing his concession as if our dogma (the reflexive distrust of government) achieved a rare victory over academics, so he wants us to have our tribal campfire celebrations and honor our mythical gods.
Unfortunately, he insists that anti-vaxxers only won because they beat a coin toss.
He insists there was no way anyone could have predicted that the pharmaceutical industry was full of large, unscrupulous companies full of psychopath leadership with no morals.
Which is odd, because his entire claim to fame (the Dilbert cartoon), was an exercise in mocking large unscrupulous companies full of psychopath leadership with no morals.
What he is doing, he would call "pace and leading". He's a hypnotist, and he would describe pace-and-leading as matching the energy and echoing back the thoughts to a group you intend to influence, so that they accept you as an expert and someone they trust.
He's called Elon's DOGE savings isn't real. He's also called Trump's tariff process corrupt.
Even now, nearly on his death bed, he's still shilling for cabal interests and declaring himself wrong on the jab to gain lost audience back.
I watched a bunch of uncensored videos on Bitchute.
The Bitchute info was way ahead of the curve.
This statement was full of conversational hypnosis. NLP. Probably to insert himself and steer the narrative that’s coming about adverse reactions. 5GW is mostly a narrative war. A war of liars and false choices.
He got famous writing a cartoon about soulless corporate bureaucracy then trusts that same system to modify his DNA?
Bingo. Also he flipped on all sorts of things right after he met with Trump.
Also he married a instagram model right after that, supposedly.
A hypnotist trained in persuasion who makes his living writing the comic you mention would only be very direct with people, though. Kek.
I’m always surprised how many people take Adams at face value. He seems to be on our side, but that doesn’t mean anyone can trust a single thing he says. At some point, he is going to to be a disclosure operation(s). Guessing this is one of them. No way he met with Trump personally and didn’t get a script.
We still have a lot of work to do on critical thinking and narrative analysis. Guessing not enough people followed Defected. Anyone who didn’t, go back. It’s worth it. https://rumble.com/playlists/Hdp1AQdJ7JI
He did mention once that he had a contact in the Israeli embassy. After that, it's definitely worth taking him with a pinch of salt.
Megan Kelly did similar.
First with Alefantis then the clot shots
Dr Makis comments on the Scott Adams announcement today
https://nitter.poast.org/MakisMD/status/1924516106594877864#m
Here is his X account,if anyone wants to follow.
https://x.com/MakisMD
also a collection of Scott's posts from here
https://communities.win/c/ScottAdams
...undeserved death is not a "victory"...
Losing our jobs and being treated like dirt for 5 years certainly doesn't feel like a "victory."
This
Deserved death is not a victory, either. It is preferred that wrongdoers turn and live.
Starting in the 1980's I labored for ten years in "cube-ville" and enjoyed Mr. Adams' "Dilbert" musings.
Him saying "I (Uncle_Fester) won" is a hollow victory.
Taken further, he is acknowledging what the future holds. A greater proportion of the populace will be pure bloods. It was a genetic event as significant as the evolution of Homo Sapiens 300,000 years ago.
Covid-19 was not just a bio-weapon. It was an intelligence test.
Intelligence has absolutely nothing to do with compliance.
You could have an IQ of 200 and be easily pressured into compliance or an IQ of 80 and be an ornery fuck who never complies with anything on principle.
Please let's stop confusing "smart" with all other virtues and vices.
THANK YOU for this concise & TRUE statement👌
Not sure this is true. There was plenty of information available for those willing to inform themselves. The intelligent course was to do that, not believe what the nice people on TV or the "experts" had to say. I have some otherwise very intelligent capable friends who failed the test - even with me informing them. Maybe not so intelligent, after all.
Exactly. And I would even take it a step further; There were plenty of unknowns. It was always retarded to take a vaccine with so many unknowns. Take with that that RNA-virusses mutate very very quickly (vaccine can not be effective) and if it could even impart any immunity, that immunity would need to be in the airways and not anywhere else (vaccine would be ineffective).
We knew all this from March 2020 onward. It was enough to at least wait it out when it came to the vaccine. Soon after enough information was available to know that the quality control on mRNA is difficult and large-scale production would result in mRNA chains of unknown length. We knew about DNA-contamination. We expected transcription of the mRNA into the DNA (how else does human DNA have large quantities of DNA of viral origin in it?).
Etc.
He could have known it all had he postponed knee-jerk judgment and actually looked at the information and heard from experts who did not just push the narrative.
There is infinite information on everything, available from an unprocessessible amount of sources.
The question isn't about availability, it's about trust and correctly judging which sources of information to trust.
Trusting those institutions which were created to safeguard information integrity isn't a sign of low intelligence, but more like a lack of experience with having your trust broken
True. I have friend at work,whose dumb as hell,and didn't take the vax.
How about “compliance” test?
The IQ is a measure of how well you can take IQ tests --- that's it.
And your ability to take IQ tests absolutely correlates with your ability to perform different cognitively difficult tasks.
Your ability to take IQ tests absolutely correlates with your ability to take IQ tests.
Elon said as much. About a month ago Elon posted ‘it was a test’.
Not just ivermectin.
FENBENDAZOLE.
I recently got myself 90 222mg pills of fenben because a family member may have cancer. Preventative measure.
We all lose when fellow citizens die because they were lied to. There are no winners and losers. Just murderers, stupid people who believe them and smart people who don't. The smart and the stupid people are on the same team. I take no victory in learning that innocent people will die. It certainly feels nice to be one of the smart ones though.
While I'm not his shrink, and I'm not qualified to make a diagnosis, yesterday's tweet strongly suggests that Adams, whose work on Dilbert I absolutely adore, is a vulnerable narcissist.
People who suffer from NPD only ever see Life as a zero-sum game, as he's clearly doing here.
Had he simply said, I have the same cancer as Biden, I'm not expected to live past the summer, and my wife and I covet your prayers, that would have been admirable.
Instead, his felt need to imply that we, the Unvaccinated, have somehow won at the expense of his life? Yeah. That's narcissistic AF.
This video seems to be a clip from 2 years ago I’ve been told. I think it’s still relevant.
Nope. He refers to Biden's Sunday announcement at the beginning.
https://www.npr.org/2025/05/20/nx-s1-5404399/scott-adams-dilbert-prostate-cancer-biden
Ivermectin & Fenbendazole. I hope someone can provide the best dosages.
I didn't use an heuristic of not trusting the government, I used my, better, careful analysis of the data and the facts. The fact is there is a deep state, they are evil, and there is ample data to prove it. You only need to look at false flags in the past where government embedded forces KILLED WILLINGLY. Then, in the teeth of a CLEARLY FAKE pandemic with a sudden, blind you with science, vaccine, all analysts of truly open mind would KNOW FOR 100% CERTAIN it is a trap. After all, every other vaccine is a FRAUD, so of course this one is too, and was being offered by MURDERERS with the excuse of a clear lie.
There is no heuristic here. Sure, at the foothills of the bell curve, some might have used dumb heuristics "Duh guvermint bad". But we are not that. We are the mages of enlightenment at the thin nose of the bell curve, prayerfully and stoically bearing the unbearable pressure of living in a cursed and evil-controlled regime, and unable to reach those behind us on the curve. Our burden is UNENDING.
We have not won, but failed, but at least we survived. But we survive to live some more in a terrible and threatening world where power remains focussed on our destruction. Our burden is another type of burden, the burden of the silent scream, while the rest of the world trudges on in blissful ignorance, hating us for being smarter, not understanding we marshal our talents to free those still trapped in lies.
Love "foothills of the bell curve!"
Just an FYI, that video was from like two years ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C41GCgyG4mI
Still relevant I feel with his cancer announcement.
We didn't want to win. We just wanted you to listen to us
I have another take on Scott Adams. He was obviously controlled during Covid to push the vaccines. And he was a total jerk about it.
So now I think it is his time to exit stage left. He was a public figure who amplified the anti-vaxxer propaganda push with his platforms.
From what I read, he did contact Dr Makis and did the ivermectin protocol, but it hasn't been effective on his cancer.
Impossible. Regardless. Wish him luck.
I never cared for Adam's but he has proven himself to be more honest than the average liberal. I alsondont wish belad health on anyone.