“Replying for visibility”. It shouldn’t have to be that way if the NPC’s would downvote low-info comments instead of upvoting them to the top just because they were the earliest comment.
This high info comment was definitely not only worthy of being posted, but worthy of being NPC upvoted to the top comment to bury actual higher info comments.
I think all I really seem as it reads, is that in cases of emergency such as this one Martial Law doesn't really need to be officially declared, its automatically ON. Which then authorizes the military to do whatever is required, including detainment and arrests. As in ALL options available bypassing other laws.
Not exactly. DC is technically not part of the US. We can’t annex it so it appears we are witnessing a “belligerent occupation” - this could end with a ‘peace treaty’ transferring DC to the USA. Kek.
I've bee reading and hearing all this "D.C. not US territory" talk and all, but the Constitution itself is very clear on it status. Article 1, Section 8. Don't care if we're taking it from the cabal, though absolutely not clear how it falls under cabal's property seeing the Consitution as so many insist. And not sure how libtards intend to make it a state when it looks like a Constitutional Amendment is required to do so, 2/3 states. So, have no idea what the discussion is really about, either way. By Article 1, Section 8 it must stay independent of any state, that's all. When did cabal "inherit" it? Sauce?
DC WAS part of the US, at least until 1871. It's been under foreign occupation since. Perhaps this is what Trump meant by taking our country back and restoring government of we the people?
I get all the claims. What I am asking for is this "foreign occupation" reference. Sauce. Article 1, Section 8 clearly spells out just what size, and why, D.C. had to be independent of any state. But so far I cannot find anything, save for posts like yours, that explain what this "foreign occupation" is, how it became and what it means. Sorry for the questions, but my analytical mind just doesn't work on "I heard" stuff and doesn't rest until I find an answer, its always a binary to me, not fuzzy logic.
Yes. In a 45 minute documentary on rumble sorry cant think of name now but it discusses howbthr trilogy had to be taken down fist.
Saudi Arabia, Israel and the Vatican.
Vatican
City of London (financial center inside London)
DC (part within DC)
Are completely immune to the laws and untouchable by law enforcement.
Im guessing this is being flushed out. Also all adrenochrome has been tainted with a non communicable virus which by Easter will expose everyone who drank adrenochrome.
Another thing is they're so addicted to kids and they’ll be denied exiting DC they’ll star turning on each other and it’ll become literally Sodom and Gomorrah.
All 3 went down in 2017 pretty much. The Vatican arrests per se at the very top were like a week ago. But the financial system was destroyed back then.
I wonder if it falls under some sort of category like an embassy would for a foreign Nation? Or under some corporate legal loophole designating it as a separate Corporation that provides "management services" for the USA INC
And perhaps the largest Q proof yet! Enacted 4 DAYS prior to our POTUS taking office!!! Prepared by those enacting the PLAN! Collectively: Q!!!
Great reading BTW...
I think they stopped the steal in 2016 and just let it happen in 2020 knowing they'll either have to publicly prove the fraud or if they dig deeper than go with the plan
all they really had to know for sure was that their would be voter fraud in nov 2020 which could be used to rally in DC and lead to bringing in 25000 national guardsmen.
covid or an earthquake voter fraud is a guaranteed event and everything was likely based just on this one event.
11.17 RELIEF EFFORTS AND CONSIGNMENTS
Special rules address relief efforts in occupied territory. Other rules address relief efforts
outside the context of occupation.
And Our Beautiful Orange POTUS is about to declare War on Washington, DC!!!
(Remember the Big Dem push for Statehood???) Not part of the United States under the Republic!!!!!
Page 767: Footnote 74 > 74 1956 FM 27-10 (Change No. 1 1976) ¶357 (“In a strict legal sense no proclamation of military occupation is
necessary. However, on account of the special relations established between the inhabitants of the occupied territory
and the occupant by virtue of the presence of occupying forces, the fact of military occupation, with the extent of
territory affected, should be made known. The practice of the United States is to make this fact known by
proclamation.”); 1914 RULES OF LAND WARFARE ¶292 (“In a strict legal sense no proclamation of military
occupation is necessary. On account of the special relations established between the inhabitants of the occupied territory and the occupant, by virtue of the presence of the invading force, the fact of military occupation, with the
extent of terrritorry [sic] affected by the same, should be made known. The practice in this country is to make this
fact known by proclamation.”); LIEBER CODE art. 1 (“A place, district, or country occupied by an enemy stands, in
consequence of the occupation, under the Martial Law of the invading or occupying army, whether any
proclamation declaring Martial Law, or any public warning to the inhabitants, has been issued or not. Martial Law
is the immediate and direct effect and consequence of occupation or conquest. The presence of a hostile army
proclaims its Martial Law.”).<
In Roman times, before invading a territory, the officials of Rome had to shout a declaration of war listing the grievances across the border. I am fuzzy on the details but the idea was that you had to announce your intentions and give notice.
This is the best part, the FOOT NOTE...this means MARTIAL IS ALREADY ENACTED and has been since the IRAQ WAR PEDES PAGE 749
75 For example, Jack L. Goldsmith III, Assistant Attorney General, “Protected Person” Status in Occupied Iraq
Under the Fourth Geneva Convention, Mar. 18, 2004, 28 OPINIONS OF THE OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL 35, 37
(“Applying this standard, the United States became an occupying power no later than April 16, 2003, the date on
which General Tommy Franks announced the creation of the ‘Coalition Provisional Authority to exercise powers of
government temporarily, and as necessary, especially to provide security, to allow the delivery of humanitarian aid
and to eliminate weapons of mass destruction.’ See Tommy R. Franks, Freedom Message to the Iraqi People (Apr.
16, 2003)”); The Venice, 69 U.S. 258, 276 (1865) (“The transports conveying the troops under the command of
Major-General Butler, commanding the Department of the Gulf, arrived on the 1st of May, and the actual
occupation of the city was begun. There was no armed resistance, but abundant manifestations of hostile spirit and
temper both by the people and the authorities. The landing of the troops was completed on the 2d of May, and on
the 6th a proclamation of General Butler, which had been prepared and dated on the 1st, and the next day printed by
some soldiers, in an office seized for the purpose, was published in the newspapers of the city. Some copies of the
proclamation had been previously distributed to individuals, but it was not made known to the population generally
until thus published. There was no hostile demonstration, and no disturbance afterwards; and we think that the
military occupation of the city of New Orleans may be considered as substantially complete from the date of this
publication; and that all the rights and obligations resulting from such occupation, or from the terms of the
proclamation, may be properly regarded as existing from that time. This proclamation declared the city to be under
martial law, and announced the principles by which the commanding general would be guided in its
administration.”).
WOW...we are still UNDER MARTIAL LAW FOLKS...no need to declare it.
The early Q drops said Podesta Huma and HRC would be arrested 11.3, 11.4, 11.6 etc. We thought those were dates...it could relate to the military occupation of D.C.
with regard to literal mapping of document sections to Q statements, what would Huma indictment have to do with "11.6 PROTECTION OF THE POPULATION OF AN OCCUPIED TERRITORY" ?
I think though, that Trump would actually be #17 because Lincoln was truly the last POTUS to be chosen by thr people, while the Republic existed unbroken. The Rebellion in 1861 broke up the Union for years, even after the war ended in 1865. During Reconstruction, states were still under martial law. So the Union was still fractured under Johnson and Grant. Some states did not have their Electoral votes counted in I believe 1868 and 1872. And with the incorporation of DC in 1871, the Union, the Republic, hadn't been whole since Lincoln. So if it's now been made whole, then Trump was POTUS #17
On POTUS’ order, we have initiated certain fail-safes that shall safeguard the public from the primary fallout which is slated to occur 11.3 upon the arrest announcement of Mr. Podesta (actionable 11.4).
Now, I not saying it can't have a double meaning but read the drops for yourself.
Page 755; Footnote 5 > 5 WINTHROP, MILITARY LAW & PRECEDENTS 799 (“By military government is meant that dominion exercised in war
by a belligerent power over territory of the enemy invaded and occupied by him and over the inhabitants thereof.
By most writers, prior to the appearance of the dissenting opinion of Chase, C.J., in Ex parte Milligan, this species
of government was designated in general terms as ‘martial law,’ and thus was confused with or not properly
distinguished from the martial law proper exerted at home under circumstances of emergency, and yet to be
considered.”); Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2, 141-42 (1866) (Chase, C.J., separate opinion) (“There are under the
Constitution three kinds of military jurisdiction: one to be exercised both in peace and war; another to be exercised
in time of foreign war without the boundaries of the United States, or in time of rebellion and civil war within states
or districts occupied by rebels treated as belligerents; and a third to be exercised in time of invasion or insurrection
within the limits of the United States, or during rebellion within the limits of states maintaining adhesion to the
National Government, when the public danger requires its exercise. The first of these may be called jurisdiction
under MILITARY LAW, and is found in acts of Congress prescribing rules and articles of war, or otherwise
providing for the government of the national forces; the second may be distinguished as MILITARY
GOVERNMENT, superseding, as far as may be deemed expedient, the local law, and exercised by the military
commander under the direction of the President, with the express or implied sanction of Congress; while the third
may be denominated MARTIAL LAW PROPER, and is called into action by Congress, or temporarily, when the
action of Congress cannot be invited, and in the case of justifying or excusing peril, by the President, in times of insurrection or invasion, or of civil or foreign war, within districts or localities where ordinary law no longer
adequately secures public safety and private rights.”).<
Now this is interdasting…
Replying for visibility, images of the relevant sections below:
https://imgur.com/a/xi1G9EK
“Replying for visibility”. It shouldn’t have to be that way if the NPC’s would downvote low-info comments instead of upvoting them to the top just because they were the earliest comment.
Yes agreed
Is THAT why the nonsensical down votes appear?
It's like that way on every Internet forum though, especially if the post has good content.
I thought they were initials, like that K C guy who was arrested
Wow, Kenneth Copeland was arrested??
You mean Mr. Fart himself? :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCu5qxWTbfU
TY
Some things are worth repeating.
Some things.
Are worth.
Swamp things are worth arresting
If this is correct, the timing is also interesting. Someone happened to find out right now? Or felt comfortable releasing it today?
Anons have known for years that various dates/numbers like this in Q posts corresponded to paragraph numbers in various laws/documents like this.
This high info comment was definitely not only worthy of being posted, but worthy of being NPC upvoted to the top comment to bury actual higher info comments.
Or you can just keep talkin shit and get down-dooted instead! Ope!
Don’t be hater. Even autists need to smile while they compute high level computations.
Glad to see you back Fren!
Protoss reference?
Absolutely. Don’t try to manipulate the codes. DNA is sacred property.
Yay Bread fren! You were missed.
Uh oh.. tactical bread?? Don't want to give the FBI any insight into our assault baguettes.. sshhhh
The only time in my live I've been overly concerned about bread..
People were worried. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN YOUNG MAN?
Which drop is this one?
Should be a sticky
Agreed!
agreed!
*Rapist pedophile
*murdering, drug-trafficking, human-trafficking, raper-of-children and of women
Hillary has entered this chat
Correction. He WAS a pedophile.
https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/law_war_manual15.pdf
Pg 750
Details about occupation of sovereign territory.
I think all I really seem as it reads, is that in cases of emergency such as this one Martial Law doesn't really need to be officially declared, its automatically ON. Which then authorizes the military to do whatever is required, including detainment and arrests. As in ALL options available bypassing other laws.
Not exactly. DC is technically not part of the US. We can’t annex it so it appears we are witnessing a “belligerent occupation” - this could end with a ‘peace treaty’ transferring DC to the USA. Kek.
It's part of the U.S., even though it's not a state.
True, but it derives its governance from the US corporation, not the inherent powers of Statehood. It is a “fictitious person.”
dc has been there since before the corporation
Capitol going to be temporarily moved? New Capitol protected by the Old Guard?
Still not a state is it
Not yet, at least.
I've bee reading and hearing all this "D.C. not US territory" talk and all, but the Constitution itself is very clear on it status. Article 1, Section 8. Don't care if we're taking it from the cabal, though absolutely not clear how it falls under cabal's property seeing the Consitution as so many insist. And not sure how libtards intend to make it a state when it looks like a Constitutional Amendment is required to do so, 2/3 states. So, have no idea what the discussion is really about, either way. By Article 1, Section 8 it must stay independent of any state, that's all. When did cabal "inherit" it? Sauce?
DC WAS part of the US, at least until 1871. It's been under foreign occupation since. Perhaps this is what Trump meant by taking our country back and restoring government of we the people?
I get all the claims. What I am asking for is this "foreign occupation" reference. Sauce. Article 1, Section 8 clearly spells out just what size, and why, D.C. had to be independent of any state. But so far I cannot find anything, save for posts like yours, that explain what this "foreign occupation" is, how it became and what it means. Sorry for the questions, but my analytical mind just doesn't work on "I heard" stuff and doesn't rest until I find an answer, its always a binary to me, not fuzzy logic.
Search for: An Act to provide a Goverment for the District of Columbia 1871.
Also, compare to the original Act of 1801 that established DC. The history of DC is incredibly fascinating
the constitution established d c
Yes. In a 45 minute documentary on rumble sorry cant think of name now but it discusses howbthr trilogy had to be taken down fist.
Saudi Arabia, Israel and the Vatican.
Vatican City of London (financial center inside London) DC (part within DC) Are completely immune to the laws and untouchable by law enforcement.
Im guessing this is being flushed out. Also all adrenochrome has been tainted with a non communicable virus which by Easter will expose everyone who drank adrenochrome.
Another thing is they're so addicted to kids and they’ll be denied exiting DC they’ll star turning on each other and it’ll become literally Sodom and Gomorrah.
Q says Israel is last. It would seem that Italy/Vatican went, then Israel.
All 3 went down in 2017 pretty much. The Vatican arrests per se at the very top were like a week ago. But the financial system was destroyed back then.
I wonder if it falls under some sort of category like an embassy would for a foreign Nation? Or under some corporate legal loophole designating it as a separate Corporation that provides "management services" for the USA INC
Love the smell of napalm in the morning.
Why do you keep mentioning the District Attorney?
What does the DA have to do with washington?
D'ya like dags?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXILzUpVx7A
Then why does it have a mayor? ?
You said it didn't have a state or local government.
Beg my pardon, but HOLY SHIT!
Saving
And perhaps the largest Q proof yet! Enacted 4 DAYS prior to our POTUS taking office!!! Prepared by those enacting the PLAN! Collectively: Q!!! Great reading BTW...
The High Brass of The Army. (Those who approve the UCMJ)
Removed updoot to keep you at 17
Those guys exist!
I think they stopped the steal in 2016 and just let it happen in 2020 knowing they'll either have to publicly prove the fraud or if they dig deeper than go with the plan
And awakening the people.
Is that all they did? Or did they weaken the grasp of the DS at an international level?
That, too.
It will be scary to realize the entire world has been controlled by one Red Shield family.
But countries are falling now -- wholesale resignations.
Does not matter what I think! But, I have a GREAT stockpile of Popcorn!!!
https://nationaltoday.com/national-popcorn-day/
all they really had to know for sure was that their would be voter fraud in nov 2020 which could be used to rally in DC and lead to bringing in 25000 national guardsmen.
covid or an earthquake voter fraud is a guaranteed event and everything was likely based just on this one event.
Can we get some linked screenshots of these sections? Im at "work" and dont have time to search around, just enough time to f5 my phone on /new lol
11.3 - https://ibb.co/mDY4WFf
11.4 - https://ibb.co/X73TZ8S
11.6 - https://ibb.co/dpSDDVP
I cut out the footnotes
Edited for mistakes, cause shim dumb
This is 3, 4, and 5. Post shows 3, 4, and 6.
updated the third link, sorry bout that.
Thanks for heads up
For sure. Thanks for doing the digging haha
Anon, since you’re hot on this, try the 11-17 “date” in reference to podesta and shillary. Please?????????? Well I had the dates wrong, sorry.
Hmm, not sure about that one -
page 785 https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/law_war_manual15.pdf
Thanks for looking fren, I was mixed up on the podesta arrest date.
Crossed the Rubicon... Perhaps, Team Rubicon was crossed? By the Clinton Foundation? In Haiti?
Relief Efforts and Consignments
Nice! Quality ad.
https://imgur.com/a/xi1G9EK
Whoa. Honestly mind blown if this is the case.
And Our Beautiful Orange POTUS is about to declare War on Washington, DC!!! (Remember the Big Dem push for Statehood???) Not part of the United States under the Republic!!!!!
Sauce clickable link:
https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/DoD%20Law%20of%20War%20Manual%20-%20June%202015%20Updated%20Dec%202016.pdf?ver=2016-12-13-172036-190
Damn Good shit!
Those ‘dates’ were always a curve ball, now we see why!
We have it all and didn't realize what "All" was.
Page 767: Footnote 74 > 74 1956 FM 27-10 (Change No. 1 1976) ¶357 (“In a strict legal sense no proclamation of military occupation is necessary. However, on account of the special relations established between the inhabitants of the occupied territory and the occupant by virtue of the presence of occupying forces, the fact of military occupation, with the extent of territory affected, should be made known. The practice of the United States is to make this fact known by proclamation.”); 1914 RULES OF LAND WARFARE ¶292 (“In a strict legal sense no proclamation of military occupation is necessary. On account of the special relations established between the inhabitants of the occupied territory and the occupant, by virtue of the presence of the invading force, the fact of military occupation, with the extent of terrritorry [sic] affected by the same, should be made known. The practice in this country is to make this fact known by proclamation.”); LIEBER CODE art. 1 (“A place, district, or country occupied by an enemy stands, in consequence of the occupation, under the Martial Law of the invading or occupying army, whether any proclamation declaring Martial Law, or any public warning to the inhabitants, has been issued or not. Martial Law is the immediate and direct effect and consequence of occupation or conquest. The presence of a hostile army proclaims its Martial Law.”).<
"whether any proclamation declaring Martial Law, or any public warning to the inhabitants, has been issued or not"
In Roman times, before invading a territory, the officials of Rome had to shout a declaration of war listing the grievances across the border. I am fuzzy on the details but the idea was that you had to announce your intentions and give notice.
?Like when Michael Scott declared bankruptcy!!
This is the best part, the FOOT NOTE...this means MARTIAL IS ALREADY ENACTED and has been since the IRAQ WAR PEDES PAGE 749
75 For example, Jack L. Goldsmith III, Assistant Attorney General, “Protected Person” Status in Occupied Iraq Under the Fourth Geneva Convention, Mar. 18, 2004, 28 OPINIONS OF THE OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL 35, 37 (“Applying this standard, the United States became an occupying power no later than April 16, 2003, the date on which General Tommy Franks announced the creation of the ‘Coalition Provisional Authority to exercise powers of government temporarily, and as necessary, especially to provide security, to allow the delivery of humanitarian aid and to eliminate weapons of mass destruction.’ See Tommy R. Franks, Freedom Message to the Iraqi People (Apr. 16, 2003)”); The Venice, 69 U.S. 258, 276 (1865) (“The transports conveying the troops under the command of Major-General Butler, commanding the Department of the Gulf, arrived on the 1st of May, and the actual occupation of the city was begun. There was no armed resistance, but abundant manifestations of hostile spirit and temper both by the people and the authorities. The landing of the troops was completed on the 2d of May, and on the 6th a proclamation of General Butler, which had been prepared and dated on the 1st, and the next day printed by some soldiers, in an office seized for the purpose, was published in the newspapers of the city. Some copies of the proclamation had been previously distributed to individuals, but it was not made known to the population generally until thus published. There was no hostile demonstration, and no disturbance afterwards; and we think that the military occupation of the city of New Orleans may be considered as substantially complete from the date of this publication; and that all the rights and obligations resulting from such occupation, or from the terms of the proclamation, may be properly regarded as existing from that time. This proclamation declared the city to be under martial law, and announced the principles by which the commanding general would be guided in its administration.”).
WOW...we are still UNDER MARTIAL LAW FOLKS...no need to declare it.
Well isn't that a daisy... Hopium's back on the menu boys!
Always has. ;)
BA are you part of the Q team? :)
I'll have a Triple Hopium Classic combo, large please.
would you mind elaborating on your point for a newbie?
The early Q drops said Podesta Huma and HRC would be arrested 11.3, 11.4, 11.6 etc. We thought those were dates...it could relate to the military occupation of D.C.
thank you
"we will never broadcast our moves to the enemy
We will light a fire to flush them out"
Or something like that.
0.0
Wow
Removed. Let's keep the dooming to a minimum, people.
You're kidding right?
I do have a glimmer in my eye for Lady Liberty, but I'll take a kiss for now and a decade-long thorough Freedom-ing for a honeymoon.
Lady Liberty, the freedominatrix.
Nothing like that fren, we're not the great cucking.
This describes specific power that the MIL can assist and help without saying a thing about it.
The stealth feature, wow!
Drop 15 and 25 are often quoted by the debonkers as points of failure to deliver.
Muh LARP and such.
https://qposts.online/post/15 https://qposts.online/post/25
It was hard to say anything other that disinformation is necessary to rubute
Q has said many times that future proves past. OP has found something major here. Absolutely amazing.
with regard to literal mapping of document sections to Q statements, what would Huma indictment have to do with "11.6 PROTECTION OF THE POPULATION OF AN OCCUPIED TERRITORY" ?
Well, um...good question. the population needs protection from Iranian deep state infultraitors?
You got to up the amount of autism
https://www.qanon.pub/?q=11.
Those are Q posts with “11.” In them
Great Scott!
[D] + China = 11.3
https://qposts.online/post/4524
I think though, that Trump would actually be #17 because Lincoln was truly the last POTUS to be chosen by thr people, while the Republic existed unbroken. The Rebellion in 1861 broke up the Union for years, even after the war ended in 1865. During Reconstruction, states were still under martial law. So the Union was still fractured under Johnson and Grant. Some states did not have their Electoral votes counted in I believe 1868 and 1872. And with the incorporation of DC in 1871, the Union, the Republic, hadn't been whole since Lincoln. So if it's now been made whole, then Trump was POTUS #17
17 = Q
That song made me feel deeply for the spirit of America right now. The crossroads we stand in right now. What a powerful piece.
Rubicon has now been crossed?
Wooooow!!!! It only took a full military occupation of DC for us to see it!
This is great! See you guys later, I've got to check this out!!!
future proves past
The coolness just keeps coming!!
Wow!
I posted revised pdf from 2017, search Marines and NCR.
More hints there.
Like revelation in scripture!
This is why I sort by new.
Good shit, fren.
Dammit... nice work. opens up a brand new perspective......
Reminder that Q always did say it had to be 100% by the book; perfectly legal, enforceable, etc.....
OK, I'll buy this!
So at some point we the people stopped owning the country and it was usurped by the company USA, and the corporate fat cats?
One of the best decodes ever!
Um, I'm far from a legal expert, but doesn't 11.3 imply some kind of change of government?
Yes. Contingency government. POTUS will keep his oath. His term ends 1/20. The election fraud must be sorted or a new election takes place.
"You have more than you know".
Good work here. Certainly a plausible decode
Here is a link to the Doc https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/DoD%20Law%20of%20War%20Manual%20-%20June%202015%20Updated%20Dec%202016.pdf?ver=2016-12-13-172036-190
All this hopium is giving me chills, amazing find
Puzzle pieces falling into place FAST.
At the risk of being a wet blanket I have to tell you that Q made 9 posts referencing 11.3
In alot of those posts the writing alludes to 11.3 clearly as a timeframe.
DROP 34
Now, I not saying it can't have a double meaning but read the drops for yourself.
Also using 11.3 could’ve been a red herring to make us think it was the date, when it is actually referring to the statute or manual section
it fits the "you have more than you know" phrase used many times
this isnt even a Q post...
Idk, 1518 says:
TO ALL THOSE NOT GETTING IT: 11.3 = when HUBER made a SEALED indictment
Double meanings.
Page 755; Footnote 5 > 5 WINTHROP, MILITARY LAW & PRECEDENTS 799 (“By military government is meant that dominion exercised in war by a belligerent power over territory of the enemy invaded and occupied by him and over the inhabitants thereof. By most writers, prior to the appearance of the dissenting opinion of Chase, C.J., in Ex parte Milligan, this species of government was designated in general terms as ‘martial law,’ and thus was confused with or not properly distinguished from the martial law proper exerted at home under circumstances of emergency, and yet to be considered.”); Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2, 141-42 (1866) (Chase, C.J., separate opinion) (“There are under the Constitution three kinds of military jurisdiction: one to be exercised both in peace and war; another to be exercised in time of foreign war without the boundaries of the United States, or in time of rebellion and civil war within states or districts occupied by rebels treated as belligerents; and a third to be exercised in time of invasion or insurrection within the limits of the United States, or during rebellion within the limits of states maintaining adhesion to the National Government, when the public danger requires its exercise. The first of these may be called jurisdiction under MILITARY LAW, and is found in acts of Congress prescribing rules and articles of war, or otherwise providing for the government of the national forces; the second may be distinguished as MILITARY GOVERNMENT, superseding, as far as may be deemed expedient, the local law, and exercised by the military commander under the direction of the President, with the express or implied sanction of Congress; while the third may be denominated MARTIAL LAW PROPER, and is called into action by Congress, or temporarily, when the action of Congress cannot be invited, and in the case of justifying or excusing peril, by the President, in times of insurrection or invasion, or of civil or foreign war, within districts or localities where ordinary law no longer adequately secures public safety and private rights.”).<
Please tell me Podesta's arrest will be announced soon. I am trying so very hard to be patient.
this is far greater that mr. pedo
maga.host not working for me so here are some images if you dont wanna go rifling through the doc
https://imgur.com/a/xi1G9EK