Q didn't say anything that is contrary to this. The person in the OP claimed that SCOTUS is a front for a military tribunal. And per Q, "the military is the only way".
The above drivel is trying to show the military was a hasty afterthought.
It is completely 100% the exact opposite of what Q is.
Do you really think the "military top brass" had heard absolutely nothing about it and actually had to be convinced to do something?
When everyone in the nation, with their own plain eyes, saw the widespread voter fraud?
As if Trump could present evidence to the military top brass that the military top brass wouldn't already even know about.
It's all completely ridiculous. And as far as it being "more plausible" than Q, I've seen 1000s of Q proofs, to the point of mathematical impossibility of coincidences. The guy above trying to sell you that the military had no idea what's going on until the last second is a buffoon.
I also wouldn't put this past "agents" putting this out there on the chans/kun trying to get anons to bite, then use it to try and hurt Trump and the MAGA movement even more.
Why do you think Q's plan is a linear thing? They should be prepared for different scenarios. Moreover, not the WHOLE military was on-board from the beginning.
To be clear, I found this over at 8kun, I just found it an interesting write-up.
And that's no insult to you. I always think it necessary to share whatever we find. I have faith the community will pick it apart for me to make my own decision.
I’m sorry I stopped reading after the third “da.” I don’t want to say we have a word dress code here but come on man are you just trying to be annoying with that?
It's not on 8kun. It's from 4/pol/, which makes me doubt it more.
Moreover, it seems Q has been relatively confident with putting down the drops. Whoever posted this definitely isn't completely in the know as he suggests. For all we know the Insurrection Act could've been activated quietly. There's absolutely nothing I think that can really be gleaned here.
When you get there, you will now see that yes, pol is on 4chan.
4chan was temporarily down for like 2-3 hours on the 18th or 19th? and everyone thought it was the beginning of the great purge or in the middle of the Great Purge then 4chan came back on. I have no idea if it was taken down and a "fake" 4chan was put up as part of a honeypot.
At first it was confusing for me but after using it for a while, I finally got the handle of it. I didn't even have a "noob guide to 4chan" or anything like that. Basically, just don't be a whiny fag on there or fall for the traps!
Well if only 10 people knew the plan there would definitely be those in powerful positions that would need to be educated. Especially anyone who takes their oath to country and Constitution seriously.
I agree, this completely contradicts Q’s plan! Not to mention, the OP, who supposedly has top secret info names himself “Calm Down N——-s”??
If you believe in Q, which is the purpose of this forum, then you would believe
that this was a military operation from the start. They were the ones who asked Trump to run for President in the first place.
There was never any “Trump spent 24/7 presenting fraud evidence to the military”. How many times did Q say Military Intelligence is key? Our military likely knows more about this entire operation than Trump himself. China/Iran/Russia interfering in our election is literally an act of war and a national security issue. Do people really think Trump is out there trying to prove to the military that this actually happened? Absolutely not.
According to the LARPer, SCOTUS is just a front. If the tribunal finds that fraud occurred and Biden is illegitimate, they will force SCOTUS to rule accordingly.
They are doing this because they fear the optics of DC being under martial law.
And of course, if that's true, I vehemently disagree. The military is acting as cowards at that point - protecting people from reality because you are afraid of temper tantrums from the feminine left is pointless.
And if OP is wrong or disinfo and SCOTUS isn't a front for military tribunal, we're screwed. Because we know SCOTUS will buckle like a fart in the wind. Where's Q when you need him?
Oh, I guess I didn't get that from what I read. It makes sense what you say, bc I don't know of a SC case regarding the election was still going on with the SC.
I’m former Army. And I can affirm that top brass would not like IA as that could turn really messy really quick. And when I say top brass, I mean battalion commanders and CSMs. The Joint Chiefs are paid to look good in Class A’s but they have no direct command authority.
Eh, sure. But you know what else would go south really quick? Rounding up guns, ending 2A, and throwing Trump supporters in FEMA camps for covid reasons.
Things are likely going to get messy either which way - but if they come to the correct conclusion and limit the impact, then fine.
Them ending 2A would send the military over the edge.
The military, at least active duty, know exactly why that is a necessary right. 2A is a check on tyrannical authority and I can assure you the combat arms divisions of the Army would be behind Patriot citizens 100%.
That shit gets absolutely pounded into us in basic. Soldiers have a DUTY to refuse illegal orders.
Did you hear about what the CCP xiden regime is planning on doing??
I can find & post a source but basically they are looking to vet out ANY soldiers who own personal firearms and force them to either turn them in, or they will be labeled, I think it was; “HRI.”
What do you make of THAT?
And yes; I’ll try to find source & update this post.
It’s been talked about here recently.
The military, at least active duty, know exactly why that is a necessary right. 2A is a check on tyrannical authority and I can assure you the combat arms divisions of the Army would be behind Patriot citizens 100%.
This in the face of record firearm and ammunition sales.
I think more people have gotten red pilled to why it’s important to be able to defend yourself in the wake of Summer 2020.
People are paying attention now. Yes many are blissfully ignorant, but a good portion more have been slapped awake when their neighborhood and businesses are on fire.
I did two tours in Iraq, one in Afghanistan and had the privilege of working briefly under Gen. Flynn.
When I say that the upper levels of the military won’t stand for mass disarmament or dissolution of the second amendment, please trust what I’m saying to you.
Agreed. This scenario would explain a LOT of things that up to now have not added up at all, Trump going quiet and walking away after 1/6 maybe chief among them.
I cannot believe the military would tolerate a CiC as thoroughly compromised by the CCP, and who committed the most blatant fraud in the history of America toward the potential result of handing the CCP control of America's nuclear arsenal, as Biden. If this isn't a red line, I don't know what would be.
And I don't think most people calling for the IA really considered how that might play out. So the scenario is also a plausible means for the military to address this situation in a way that kept the veneer of proper civilian legal control (using SCOTUS as a fig leaf) and hopefully keeping public confidence.
Those who know, are going to be very tight lipped about the actual “plan”.
Which is why I remain very skeptical of talking heads like Linn Wood and Simon Parkes.
OPSEC would be so critical having 5 or six people blathering on the internet about multiple anonymous contacts telling them stuff reeks of bullshit.
Basically if someone is doing adverts for collagen or prepackaged emergency rations, they aren’t in it to clue you in on anything factual. They’re there to blow smoke up your ass and piss on your shoe and tell you it’s raining.
I'm sorry that's bullshit. Our populace is placated. The left is chicken shit and they're not armed. They hear Trump and the military have taken over and stopped a coup and we seize control of the media so they can't be lied to they'd fall in line super quick. A few troops in Seattle, Portland, and Minneapolis and those riots this past summer never happen.
Well, as a vet I worked for a joint chief and they are not just there to look pretty. Your statement was wrong. I would love to have those 70 work weeks back and not have to be at their call at all hours. If you jave not been there then you do not know what role they do have. They advise the potus on military issues. Then they relay to lower command what needs to be done.
Nothing can stop what is coming. I don't believe people are infallible. Even the people behind the Q plan. But a lot of what was said here would make the Q plan either a dud or a larp. Neither of which imo make sense.
It’s impossible to keep up with the constant flood of new posts here; I’ve seen a TON of threads calling for restrictions on when & how new accounts can post.
Have the mods made any decisions about that?
IMO, it really needs to be done to maintain morale and quality of the board.
Q predicted everything that has happened up to this point.
That's not very difficult when you've got thousands of posts that are basically horoscope tier of vagueness, and when you have people willing to add random numbers together and present it as "proof".
I'm not trying to dis on Q. My question is, with 5000 drops, how do we know who is triggering which drop? I believe pompeo could very well have been, his posts time seemed to coincide with drops that exactly spoke to current events, best we could ascertain.
My fear is, without consistent feedback, it becomes a guessing game, looking at potential sources and finding number combos which match posts which seem to match events in your point of view.
Part of this may very well be my perception, I've not been with GAW for very long. I have no reason to doubt Q is real, quite far from it.
I guess I've got a healthy dose of scepticism left, and am not sure how this all plays out.... Seems to be part faith, part tarrot card reading.
Again, not trying to trivialize, just trying to figure stuff out like the rest.
Better reply is if the military doesn't support the US constitution from 1776 then they have zero honor and are complicit it the takeover of a foreign power. Not that they would care, unless it impacts them directly, stand up now or wait till they come and take everyone to fema camps. We have seen this rodeo before. Iget that is a messy situation, but pussy footing around isn't going to fix anything. There is a limit to how much people can take, we haven't hit it yet, pray we don't because it will be an revolution, that nothing will be able to stop.
The military might know how to better handle the situation than invoking a military coup against what appears to the public to be an elected president.
Okay, interesting LARP has my ears perked. But I am having trouble finding any Trump cases on the supreme court website. What is happening with these cases?
Thanks. Well, I don't know jack about the law because none of it really makes sense to me. Lol. Do you have any idea what's the current prognosis of this case? Future dates to look for?
Surprised I haven’t seen comment on this so far;
This 4chan stuff in the OP was written on 1/17; wasn’t there a big, significant SCOTUS case scheduled for yesterday; 1/22?
Ah, ok. So what's the thinking - if PA is declared invalid, they could just flip the EC votes for PA; that wouldn't be enough to swing the result. Would a problem with only 1 state be deemed sufficient for a military action?
My understanding is that if evidence is shown of fraud in one case, it causes a domino effect. If necessitates other states who had similar occurrences to be reviewed.
It would lead to a contingent election.
Though I am not quite fond of the idea that Trump thought this could have been done better than it currently is - and I am also not quite fond of the military remaining 'neutral' while the current administration has made it pretty clear that they want to jail Trump supporters...
Either way, I'm not impressed with the military given this person's supposed information.
this is tough to trust the plan if our route is to go the legal route. It is however better for optics and normie but..... they didn't do jack shit all these months ago.
Hmmm...I heard of a Few SCROTUS cases? AND that they were after the Election. ALSO the one where Xiden had to win (Illegally) in order for the case to be heard. WITH all the Evidence that was JUST presented to US, even Stevie Wonder could see that it was stolen. WHAT ever Happened to the DNI report and the 2018 E.O. ? IF this Stolen election is not resolved, and our votes do not count, obviously we have lost our country. These idiots just ran a fraudulent election that would make a Banana Republic country Blush. In the Immortal words of Vince Lombardi " What the HELL is going on here"
I could see the plausibilty of this scenario except:
They want to avoid a civil war? So, if it comes to a fraudulent President ending up in office what do they think is going to happen?
With him now sworn in, and later maybe removed, what do they think is going to happen?
As supposedly.staunch Constitutionalists, what do they feel about the rights of Americans to vote being absolutely trampled with the help of a foreign government (that admitted it in sworn affidavits).
As Constitutionalists, I thought it said the President was the CiC. Reading the IA, all conditions of an Insurrection were achieved, yet they will not support it? How much more of an Insurrection do you need?
If Biden is right now supposedly illegitimate, why is he issuing EOs?
I mean, this is an Anon claiming to be in the know, but I am unsure of this. The military has a duty to protect American citizens from an illegitimate government.
The one about the military backing the DS is worrying. There is clear evidence of foreign interference.
I don't know. While it seems plausible, I don't think getting involved AFTER installing an illegitimate President was the wisest course of action.
Agree with most everything.
1 point, ive seen a couple articles now, all the EOs Biden the Bastard has sighned are temporarily...halted? Being reviewed or something by a federal judge.
I'm confused...why would military tribunals be hiding behind scotus? To protect the snowflakes from losing their minds? I don't understand the logic behind it. Military tribunals act completely separate from the court system so why would this be any different?
am i the only one getting larp vibes? how does he know this much. who is this person. It seems like a very specific explanation down to the detail of whats going on?
Anybody that starts off their OP w/ the N word is not somebody that I am going to get behind.
We're supposed to be behind a movement of unity, and that is far separate from those that fail to recognize even the smaller instances of racism. Certainly not for censorship, however such a title would only be that of an edgy 20 year old that is going through community college and has some extra time to write some hit pieces on 4chan.
This person isn't 'in-the-know' and if you fall for that, you're falling for something easy to boost your ego.
Is this ONLY related to the election fraud and interference? I can see "some" arrest of high political figures, as in 100s. However, at one point "No Deals" was dropped, wasn't it? Between Hunter's laptop, Pizza gate and treason those arrest should hit 1000s of high powered political, financial and celebrity people.
I am not real comfortable even thinking there is a fake shadow government happening. I will be PISSED if it is happening, for just cause, and every person who breathed in or near any of the crimes doesn't go to jail for the rest of their lives.
This basically reads to me as a way to justify a lie to the American people. "Cause it will cause chaos and and unstability in our nation or tank the stock market" How does that make anything better? Having the power to deep fake the American people is what got us in to this place. If our country has to go thru hell for all of this, then I want a strong, honest and honorable foundation to rebuild on. Not a government that has so much power they can kill kids and get away with it!
Yeah I think maybe bits and pieces of this might be true, but it seems like the rest is a complete LARP.
I think the election fraud cases will probably be the last to come. The Maxwell documents begin to get unsealed next week. I think it might start off with human trafficking crimes, FISAGATE, ObamaGate. Cases that identify these people as criminals, but have little to no relation to Trump so that the media can’t say it’s “Russian disinformation”. Once the public is aware of how evil these people are we may start arrests from the sealed indictments and the Durham investigation. By that time it will be nearly impossible to deny the election fraud evidence.
I’m glad I could help! I have to remind myself of this too sometimes. We have the facts and the evidence. We just don’t know when or how it’s going to play out.
I think people are spending way too much time trying to figure out if Biden’s actually at the White House or if he’s a body double. In my opinion it doesn’t really matter because the end result will be the same.
Right now our real enemies are China and Iran. I think we should be focusing on potential developments with them and how we’re going to take them down.
The thing that bothers me most about this theory is I firmly believe the military tapped Trump for the Presidency. They warned him when they discovered he was bugged. They may have even been able to stop some election fraud planned for Hillary.
But this poster is saying now the military needs convincing? The military had no further contingencies? Elect Trump and... nothing? It doesn't ring true.
The military isn't a single person. It's a large organization with many people. It's totally conceivable that persons within the military tapped him while having other top brass not be aware of an above-top secret plan whom need to be convinced.
It doesn't pass the sniff test and smacks of doomerism and defeat. Q didn't spend years planning for this day only to start questioning the plan now. If the ship needs to be rightened, then it's Q that needs to tell us.
The problem with being anonymous is that you don't know who you're talking to.
I put this post in the "SUSPECT" category. Why would the salutation start with "calm down niggers"?
Some valid analytical points are made:
There are important SCOTUS cases pending.
Avoiding Civil War has merit by making things flow thru legal channels; however, anyone with eyes to see know how fraudulent the election was. So I fail to understand how allowing a fraudulent election to stand can possibly avert Civil War.
Point 6 of the text states that "he was denied a legitimate public inauguration on the steps of the Capitol" - Then why is there news footage of such?
How is it treasonous to invoke the Insurrection Act?
Overall there are too many inconsistent statements for me to consider valid.
This guy doesn't know fuck all what's going on anymore than anyone else does. What the fuck kind of mission/homework assignment does he think he's sending us to do? "Get more people to focus on the SCOTUS case"? Who the fuck cares how many people are focusing on that? How does getting people to "focus" on it help anything?
It's bullshit. It only feels plausible at all because there's a lot of it and we're eager for news. Ignore.
100% objectively true;
SCOTUS NEVER takes “public opinion” into consideration when making their decisions, or at least they are not ever supposed to.
It doesn’t matter if a million Americans wrote them letters; it wouldn’t change the way they rule.
Hell; has any SCOTUS case EVER been influenced in the least by thousands of idiots protesting at the actual steps of the SCOTUS building?
Nope.
I think this 4 Chan OP is just a total 4chan larp and am disappointed it’s stickied.
OP: thank you for posting it; I’m not being rude to you; it gives us good food for thought, alternate perspectives to consider, etc....but we should all be very careful how much we let anonymous stuff like this influence our thinking.
Interesting, this certainly sounds like the most plausible explanation of what's transpired so far. Most of the comments in this thread deriding anon's post essentially amounts to "I don't like the implications of what he's saying, therefore it must be a larp". Needless to say that's not exactly compelling counter-evidence.
It should be obvious that the military is not a monolithic hive-mind. If what Q has said about only 10 people being in the know of the operation is true, then wouldn't it stand to reason that they would have to persuade other top brass who aren't in the inner circle? Why is it so hard to believe that they want the evidence to be presented before a court in order to verify the truth before choosing sides? Is it because it's uncomfortable to think that things may be a little more uncertain than we were led to believe?
I know this is considered heresy to some but I believe people should be reminded. Q is not God. The people behind Q are clearly not trolls or larping and are indeed very knowledgeable and have a sophisticated plan in place, but is it so inconceivable that perhaps the deep state withheld a card up their sleeve? After all, we're talking about a conspiracy millennia in the making. I would assume that the Cabal would have some countermoves.
I'm certain Q's plan will come to fruition in the end, but I'm not going to pretend like the plan is completely immune to some surprises.
Agreed, Q was a psychological operation run by a small group in military intelligence. Ultimately, military intelligence does not make the final decisions.
Yes, Q wanted us to trust the plan, however the plan was just a plan and when plans hit the real world sometimes they stumble.
I am guessing that the military doesn’t want conflict in the streets of America and so they’re trying to resolve this in a peaceful way.
One thing that tells me that the globalists have started to realize that they are not getting their way is that left wing Antifa types are still rioting in the streets. That rioting is being done as a threat to those who dare are to consider or examine election fraud.
So you're saying Q is fake, the military wasn't behind Trump, and he had to try and convince them at the very last minute to overturn the election? mmmmk
If the generals wouldn't let Trump stay in power and invoke the insurrection act, because they were hardcore constitutionalists... Then what part of the constitution gives them the power absent authority of the Commander In Chief to occupy DC and hold tribunals?
Why? There are hundreds of generals in the US Military. It's pretty stupid to think that they would all be 100% on the same page at the same time.
Q didn't say anything that is contrary to this. The person in the OP claimed that SCOTUS is a front for a military tribunal. And per Q, "the military is the only way".
Q is about the military being the only way.
The above drivel is trying to show the military was a hasty afterthought.
It is completely 100% the exact opposite of what Q is.
Just what SCOTUS hearing is to be taking place over this, since Xiden has been sworn in? It seems all to be moot at this point.
Q is about the military being the only way.
The above drivel is trying to show the military was a hasty afterthought.
It is completely 100% the exact opposite of what Q is.
Do you really think the "military top brass" had heard absolutely nothing about it and actually had to be convinced to do something?
When everyone in the nation, with their own plain eyes, saw the widespread voter fraud?
As if Trump could present evidence to the military top brass that the military top brass wouldn't already even know about.
It's all completely ridiculous. And as far as it being "more plausible" than Q, I've seen 1000s of Q proofs, to the point of mathematical impossibility of coincidences. The guy above trying to sell you that the military had no idea what's going on until the last second is a buffoon.
there already was insane voter fraud.... and the military did nothing. Yes, there is a preparation, but I am having doubts.
ngl these posts make me doom a bit, but I am patient.
Well, it should be reasonable they aren't traitors.
I also wouldn't put this past "agents" putting this out there on the chans/kun trying to get anons to bite, then use it to try and hurt Trump and the MAGA movement even more.
DIDO...this Plan of Q was started back before Trump was even President folks...
Why do you think Q's plan is a linear thing? They should be prepared for different scenarios. Moreover, not the WHOLE military was on-board from the beginning.
To be clear, I found this over at 8kun, I just found it an interesting write-up.
It's a LARP.
And that's no insult to you. I always think it necessary to share whatever we find. I have faith the community will pick it apart for me to make my own decision.
How do you draw a conclusion before you’re able to pick it apart?
Information is malleable. Don’t turn it into a belief system.
If Q is legit, this guy is a LARP. Does this guy's take sound at all like "Nothing can stop what is coming" to you?
I’m sorry I stopped reading after the third “da.” I don’t want to say we have a word dress code here but come on man are you just trying to be annoying with that?
This dude is baiting people into being racist so they can screenshot it
Yep, I don't have the time nor tolerance to wade through shit like that.
It's not on 8kun. It's from 4/pol/, which makes me doubt it more.
Moreover, it seems Q has been relatively confident with putting down the drops. Whoever posted this definitely isn't completely in the know as he suggests. For all we know the Insurrection Act could've been activated quietly. There's absolutely nothing I think that can really be gleaned here.
I found the screenshot at 8kun, but yeah the original conversation should be on pol as you suggested.
Anon said "IA was unwarranted for current situation...".
Super n00b questions but;
What’s the URL for POL?
I thought /pol/ was part of 4chan / 8Chan / 8kun?
I thought 4chan was totally shut down.
I’ve been on 8kun a tiny bit & it is confusing as fuck. Is there any sort of “8kun for n00bfag / retards” that I could look at? LMAO.
Can anyone please explain?
Thanks frens.
You append that at the end of the url for 4chan.
When you get there, you will now see that yes, pol is on 4chan.
4chan was temporarily down for like 2-3 hours on the 18th or 19th? and everyone thought it was the beginning of the great purge or in the middle of the Great Purge then 4chan came back on. I have no idea if it was taken down and a "fake" 4chan was put up as part of a honeypot.
At first it was confusing for me but after using it for a while, I finally got the handle of it. I didn't even have a "noob guide to 4chan" or anything like that. Basically, just don't be a whiny fag on there or fall for the traps!
Trump said in a video that alot of elites didn't like him and he would be "going away for a while".
There's evidence he knew exactly the current scenario would happen.
Well if only 10 people knew the plan there would definitely be those in powerful positions that would need to be educated. Especially anyone who takes their oath to country and Constitution seriously.
They might be willing to listen but still need to see evidence. Trust but verify.
I agree, this completely contradicts Q’s plan! Not to mention, the OP, who supposedly has top secret info names himself “Calm Down N——-s”??
If you believe in Q, which is the purpose of this forum, then you would believe that this was a military operation from the start. They were the ones who asked Trump to run for President in the first place.
There was never any “Trump spent 24/7 presenting fraud evidence to the military”. How many times did Q say Military Intelligence is key? Our military likely knows more about this entire operation than Trump himself. China/Iran/Russia interfering in our election is literally an act of war and a national security issue. Do people really think Trump is out there trying to prove to the military that this actually happened? Absolutely not.
WHY IS THIS STICKIED???
why the fuck would we be putting our hopes into SCOTUS again?
fool me once shame on you...
SCOTUS will do nothing. Thankfully we have the majority, but who knows who will defect.
According to the LARPer, SCOTUS is just a front. If the tribunal finds that fraud occurred and Biden is illegitimate, they will force SCOTUS to rule accordingly.
They are doing this because they fear the optics of DC being under martial law.
And of course, if that's true, I vehemently disagree. The military is acting as cowards at that point - protecting people from reality because you are afraid of temper tantrums from the feminine left is pointless.
And if OP is wrong or disinfo and SCOTUS isn't a front for military tribunal, we're screwed. Because we know SCOTUS will buckle like a fart in the wind. Where's Q when you need him?
Damn dude chill, I'm not dooming, I used the word "if" just like you used the word "supposedly".
Good points, thanks.
He's not saying the SCOTUS justices are on the case... he's saying there is a military trial happening in the physical SC building.
They evacuated the Supreme Court building on the morning of the inauguration.
Oh, I guess I didn't get that from what I read. It makes sense what you say, bc I don't know of a SC case regarding the election was still going on with the SC.
Exactly.
Is any of this OP even remotely accurate?
Does SCOTUS in any way have an authority over any military trials / tribunals, or could SCOTUS be called in to preside over any military tribunals?
Are any of the fundamentals here even sound?
When Graham asked Kav about military vs. civilian law, they talked about how they are 2 separate bodies of law.
Even I know that; you have the UCMJ and then normal civilian laws.
Why would you want a civilian court in any way involved in military issues?
Just because civilians are on trial at the MIL tribunals?
this
This makes sense.
I’m former Army. And I can affirm that top brass would not like IA as that could turn really messy really quick. And when I say top brass, I mean battalion commanders and CSMs. The Joint Chiefs are paid to look good in Class A’s but they have no direct command authority.
Eh, sure. But you know what else would go south really quick? Rounding up guns, ending 2A, and throwing Trump supporters in FEMA camps for covid reasons.
Things are likely going to get messy either which way - but if they come to the correct conclusion and limit the impact, then fine.
If not, they are a bunch of fucking jar heads.
Them ending 2A would send the military over the edge.
The military, at least active duty, know exactly why that is a necessary right. 2A is a check on tyrannical authority and I can assure you the combat arms divisions of the Army would be behind Patriot citizens 100%.
That shit gets absolutely pounded into us in basic. Soldiers have a DUTY to refuse illegal orders.
Sir:
Did you hear about what the CCP xiden regime is planning on doing??
I can find & post a source but basically they are looking to vet out ANY soldiers who own personal firearms and force them to either turn them in, or they will be labeled, I think it was; “HRI.”
What do you make of THAT?
And yes; I’ll try to find source & update this post. It’s been talked about here recently.
It's the exact OOPOSITE case in the Coast Guard.
This assumes that the US Military isn’t paying attention and is naive enough to not notice what corrupt bureaucrats have been, and are doing, in DC:
Yeah, this is a recent problem so... /s. fock off. This whole premise is stupid... and for some unGodly reason, it's stickied.
This in the face of record firearm and ammunition sales.
I think more people have gotten red pilled to why it’s important to be able to defend yourself in the wake of Summer 2020.
People are paying attention now. Yes many are blissfully ignorant, but a good portion more have been slapped awake when their neighborhood and businesses are on fire.
I am thinking about what’s going on.
I did two tours in Iraq, one in Afghanistan and had the privilege of working briefly under Gen. Flynn.
When I say that the upper levels of the military won’t stand for mass disarmament or dissolution of the second amendment, please trust what I’m saying to you.
The 2A prevented the IA being thought viable. Is this irony?
Agreed. This scenario would explain a LOT of things that up to now have not added up at all, Trump going quiet and walking away after 1/6 maybe chief among them.
I cannot believe the military would tolerate a CiC as thoroughly compromised by the CCP, and who committed the most blatant fraud in the history of America toward the potential result of handing the CCP control of America's nuclear arsenal, as Biden. If this isn't a red line, I don't know what would be.
And I don't think most people calling for the IA really considered how that might play out. So the scenario is also a plausible means for the military to address this situation in a way that kept the veneer of proper civilian legal control (using SCOTUS as a fig leaf) and hopefully keeping public confidence.
Those who know, are going to be very tight lipped about the actual “plan”.
Which is why I remain very skeptical of talking heads like Linn Wood and Simon Parkes.
OPSEC would be so critical having 5 or six people blathering on the internet about multiple anonymous contacts telling them stuff reeks of bullshit.
Basically if someone is doing adverts for collagen or prepackaged emergency rations, they aren’t in it to clue you in on anything factual. They’re there to blow smoke up your ass and piss on your shoe and tell you it’s raining.
I'm sorry that's bullshit. Our populace is placated. The left is chicken shit and they're not armed. They hear Trump and the military have taken over and stopped a coup and we seize control of the media so they can't be lied to they'd fall in line super quick. A few troops in Seattle, Portland, and Minneapolis and those riots this past summer never happen.
I am starting to think the military is useless. They will not act until there are tons of good optics.
Who do you think tells the battalion commanders what to do.
I don’t have to guess.
The Secretary of Defense. Which would be Chris Miller.
Well, as a vet I worked for a joint chief and they are not just there to look pretty. Your statement was wrong. I would love to have those 70 work weeks back and not have to be at their call at all hours. If you jave not been there then you do not know what role they do have. They advise the potus on military issues. Then they relay to lower command what needs to be done.
Just looked it up; Miller was in fact replaced as of 1/20/2021.
Does that change your opinion?
I thought he just got replaced yesterday by a xiden pick? Is miller still SECDEF?
If the top brass wants to avoid a civil war then they had damn well better undo this obviously fraudulent election.
I don't buy a lot of this.
Nothing can stop what is coming. I don't believe people are infallible. Even the people behind the Q plan. But a lot of what was said here would make the Q plan either a dud or a larp. Neither of which imo make sense.
Agree completely.
It’s impossible to keep up with the constant flood of new posts here; I’ve seen a TON of threads calling for restrictions on when & how new accounts can post.
Have the mods made any decisions about that?
IMO, it really needs to be done to maintain morale and quality of the board.
Well said bro, but imma give it until march and see what happens.
That's not very difficult when you've got thousands of posts that are basically horoscope tier of vagueness, and when you have people willing to add random numbers together and present it as "proof".
You okay?
Its easy when you stack a database with thousands of entries, good for any given scenario or event happening at the time.
I'd say thats awesome.
I'm not trying to dis on Q. My question is, with 5000 drops, how do we know who is triggering which drop? I believe pompeo could very well have been, his posts time seemed to coincide with drops that exactly spoke to current events, best we could ascertain.
My fear is, without consistent feedback, it becomes a guessing game, looking at potential sources and finding number combos which match posts which seem to match events in your point of view.
Part of this may very well be my perception, I've not been with GAW for very long. I have no reason to doubt Q is real, quite far from it.
I guess I've got a healthy dose of scepticism left, and am not sure how this all plays out.... Seems to be part faith, part tarrot card reading.
Again, not trying to trivialize, just trying to figure stuff out like the rest.
I can accept that. TY! ?
This makes it out to seem like “Q” is nothing but Trump entirely and Trump came to the military instead of the other way around
Probably because there are hundreds of generals in the US Military and it's stupid to think that they would all be 100% on the same page.
Agreed. This was not the plan, but we can agree that things didn't pan out optically.
I feel like they changed their mind. The setup for something and EOs was there.
Q didn't say anything to contradict this possibility. in fact, he said that "military is the only way", and didn't specify a military coup.
If the military doesn’t support Trump, I will not support the military.
Better reply is if the military doesn't support the US constitution from 1776 then they have zero honor and are complicit it the takeover of a foreign power. Not that they would care, unless it impacts them directly, stand up now or wait till they come and take everyone to fema camps. We have seen this rodeo before. Iget that is a messy situation, but pussy footing around isn't going to fix anything. There is a limit to how much people can take, we haven't hit it yet, pray we don't because it will be an revolution, that nothing will be able to stop.
The military might know how to better handle the situation than invoking a military coup against what appears to the public to be an elected president.
Okay, interesting LARP has my ears perked. But I am having trouble finding any Trump cases on the supreme court website. What is happening with these cases?
I am finding 18, when searching for "Trump" here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docket.aspx
But I don't know which ones would be relevant.
I did the same. You said 18. Did you mean 18 pages or 18 cases?
I saw 18 pages, not cases. If we're talking about cases, I see 86 items, for which I don't know if all are cases and whether they're current or not.
or here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=docket/docketfiles/html/public%5C20-845.html
Thanks. Well, I don't know jack about the law because none of it really makes sense to me. Lol. Do you have any idea what's the current prognosis of this case? Future dates to look for?
Surprised I haven’t seen comment on this so far; This 4chan stuff in the OP was written on 1/17; wasn’t there a big, significant SCOTUS case scheduled for yesterday; 1/22?
LARP !
Give me a break.
Thank you.
edit: Here on the GA .win we are supposed to drop all notion of "the plan" and follow this cunt? Uh. no?
Sort of new to this. Can you tell me what LARP is?
Live Action Role Play
Urban Dictionary
One example would be the people that dress up in costumes at the Renaissance Fair.
Live Action Role Play - a fake - a pretender
Sorry, 'what' SCOTUS case are we talking about?
The one pennsylvania had docketed for Friday against the secretary of state in PA
Ah, ok. So what's the thinking - if PA is declared invalid, they could just flip the EC votes for PA; that wouldn't be enough to swing the result. Would a problem with only 1 state be deemed sufficient for a military action?
My understanding is that if evidence is shown of fraud in one case, it causes a domino effect. If necessitates other states who had similar occurrences to be reviewed.
It would lead to a contingent election.
Though I am not quite fond of the idea that Trump thought this could have been done better than it currently is - and I am also not quite fond of the military remaining 'neutral' while the current administration has made it pretty clear that they want to jail Trump supporters...
Either way, I'm not impressed with the military given this person's supposed information.
this is tough to trust the plan if our route is to go the legal route. It is however better for optics and normie but..... they didn't do jack shit all these months ago.
Pathetic.
It's technically through military tribunals. But the fact that it's done entirely in secret is nauseating to me.
https://www.scotusblog.com/election-litigation/
Hmmm...I heard of a Few SCROTUS cases? AND that they were after the Election. ALSO the one where Xiden had to win (Illegally) in order for the case to be heard. WITH all the Evidence that was JUST presented to US, even Stevie Wonder could see that it was stolen. WHAT ever Happened to the DNI report and the 2018 E.O. ? IF this Stolen election is not resolved, and our votes do not count, obviously we have lost our country. These idiots just ran a fraudulent election that would make a Banana Republic country Blush. In the Immortal words of Vince Lombardi " What the HELL is going on here"
I could see the plausibilty of this scenario except:
I mean, this is an Anon claiming to be in the know, but I am unsure of this. The military has a duty to protect American citizens from an illegitimate government. The one about the military backing the DS is worrying. There is clear evidence of foreign interference.
I don't know. While it seems plausible, I don't think getting involved AFTER installing an illegitimate President was the wisest course of action.
Lots of good thoughts, but you said "their" instead of "there" so everything you said is irrelevant.
Fixed it :)
Was typing that from mobile so maybe it was the woeful spellcheck phones have?
Agree with most everything. 1 point, ive seen a couple articles now, all the EOs Biden the Bastard has sighned are temporarily...halted? Being reviewed or something by a federal judge.
I'm confused...why would military tribunals be hiding behind scotus? To protect the snowflakes from losing their minds? I don't understand the logic behind it. Military tribunals act completely separate from the court system so why would this be any different?
That would stand to reason though. This whole theory revolves around minimizing loss of life, so the concept holds.
Not well, though,
am i the only one getting larp vibes? how does he know this much. who is this person. It seems like a very specific explanation down to the detail of whats going on?
Awesome. This is info/disinfo meant and NOT meant for us.
Anybody that starts off their OP w/ the N word is not somebody that I am going to get behind.
We're supposed to be behind a movement of unity, and that is far separate from those that fail to recognize even the smaller instances of racism. Certainly not for censorship, however such a title would only be that of an edgy 20 year old that is going through community college and has some extra time to write some hit pieces on 4chan.
This person isn't 'in-the-know' and if you fall for that, you're falling for something easy to boost your ego.
Op is way off base on a lot of points I believe.
Interesting exchange I have no idea what the case involves.
Is this ONLY related to the election fraud and interference? I can see "some" arrest of high political figures, as in 100s. However, at one point "No Deals" was dropped, wasn't it? Between Hunter's laptop, Pizza gate and treason those arrest should hit 1000s of high powered political, financial and celebrity people.
I am not real comfortable even thinking there is a fake shadow government happening. I will be PISSED if it is happening, for just cause, and every person who breathed in or near any of the crimes doesn't go to jail for the rest of their lives.
This basically reads to me as a way to justify a lie to the American people. "Cause it will cause chaos and and unstability in our nation or tank the stock market" How does that make anything better? Having the power to deep fake the American people is what got us in to this place. If our country has to go thru hell for all of this, then I want a strong, honest and honorable foundation to rebuild on. Not a government that has so much power they can kill kids and get away with it!
Yeah I think maybe bits and pieces of this might be true, but it seems like the rest is a complete LARP.
I think the election fraud cases will probably be the last to come. The Maxwell documents begin to get unsealed next week. I think it might start off with human trafficking crimes, FISAGATE, ObamaGate. Cases that identify these people as criminals, but have little to no relation to Trump so that the media can’t say it’s “Russian disinformation”. Once the public is aware of how evil these people are we may start arrests from the sealed indictments and the Durham investigation. By that time it will be nearly impossible to deny the election fraud evidence.
That may be the most calming answer. Exactly what I needed to hear.
I’m glad I could help! I have to remind myself of this too sometimes. We have the facts and the evidence. We just don’t know when or how it’s going to play out.
I think people are spending way too much time trying to figure out if Biden’s actually at the White House or if he’s a body double. In my opinion it doesn’t really matter because the end result will be the same.
Right now our real enemies are China and Iran. I think we should be focusing on potential developments with them and how we’re going to take them down.
The thing that bothers me most about this theory is I firmly believe the military tapped Trump for the Presidency. They warned him when they discovered he was bugged. They may have even been able to stop some election fraud planned for Hillary.
But this poster is saying now the military needs convincing? The military had no further contingencies? Elect Trump and... nothing? It doesn't ring true.
The military isn't a single person. It's a large organization with many people. It's totally conceivable that persons within the military tapped him while having other top brass not be aware of an above-top secret plan whom need to be convinced.
This is the biggest load of guesswork and assumption larpery ever.
Anyone could have pieced this together as a plausible theory. The fact he spoke like a classic channer is a dead give away.
Come on.
It doesn't pass the sniff test and smacks of doomerism and defeat. Q didn't spend years planning for this day only to start questioning the plan now. If the ship needs to be rightened, then it's Q that needs to tell us.
The problem with being anonymous is that you don't know who you're talking to.
I put this post in the "SUSPECT" category. Why would the salutation start with "calm down niggers"?
Some valid analytical points are made:
There are important SCOTUS cases pending.
Avoiding Civil War has merit by making things flow thru legal channels; however, anyone with eyes to see know how fraudulent the election was. So I fail to understand how allowing a fraudulent election to stand can possibly avert Civil War.
Point 6 of the text states that "he was denied a legitimate public inauguration on the steps of the Capitol" - Then why is there news footage of such?
How is it treasonous to invoke the Insurrection Act?
Overall there are too many inconsistent statements for me to consider valid.
That’s just how the fags at 4ch/8kun talk.
This is an obvious L.A.R.P
This guy doesn't know fuck all what's going on anymore than anyone else does. What the fuck kind of mission/homework assignment does he think he's sending us to do? "Get more people to focus on the SCOTUS case"? Who the fuck cares how many people are focusing on that? How does getting people to "focus" on it help anything?
It's bullshit. It only feels plausible at all because there's a lot of it and we're eager for news. Ignore.
Great post.
100% objectively true; SCOTUS NEVER takes “public opinion” into consideration when making their decisions, or at least they are not ever supposed to.
It doesn’t matter if a million Americans wrote them letters; it wouldn’t change the way they rule.
Hell; has any SCOTUS case EVER been influenced in the least by thousands of idiots protesting at the actual steps of the SCOTUS building?
Nope.
I think this 4 Chan OP is just a total 4chan larp and am disappointed it’s stickied.
OP: thank you for posting it; I’m not being rude to you; it gives us good food for thought, alternate perspectives to consider, etc....but we should all be very careful how much we let anonymous stuff like this influence our thinking.
If Q is MI then yes, mil. Has been in it for a while.
is this stickied because there is some reason to think this is plausible?
Fewer than 10.
No outside comms.
"I need another month" -MF
NSA accidentally releases it ALL?
Stay united, stay salty, and trust the plan.
let's hope it is up to 2 months and not 4 years. Each day it feels more like it.
if the inauguration at the steps of the capitol was fake...why do we see videos of it happening? or "happening"
deep fakes
A lot of weird things about the inauguration but this isn't a deep fake https://gab.com/GhostEzra/posts/105606349136391852
This seems to ignore the fact that the military is our only option.
No one expects SCOTUS to do the right thing.
All this from 1-17, which seems like ages ago.
Interesting, this certainly sounds like the most plausible explanation of what's transpired so far. Most of the comments in this thread deriding anon's post essentially amounts to "I don't like the implications of what he's saying, therefore it must be a larp". Needless to say that's not exactly compelling counter-evidence.
It should be obvious that the military is not a monolithic hive-mind. If what Q has said about only 10 people being in the know of the operation is true, then wouldn't it stand to reason that they would have to persuade other top brass who aren't in the inner circle? Why is it so hard to believe that they want the evidence to be presented before a court in order to verify the truth before choosing sides? Is it because it's uncomfortable to think that things may be a little more uncertain than we were led to believe?
I know this is considered heresy to some but I believe people should be reminded. Q is not God. The people behind Q are clearly not trolls or larping and are indeed very knowledgeable and have a sophisticated plan in place, but is it so inconceivable that perhaps the deep state withheld a card up their sleeve? After all, we're talking about a conspiracy millennia in the making. I would assume that the Cabal would have some countermoves.
I'm certain Q's plan will come to fruition in the end, but I'm not going to pretend like the plan is completely immune to some surprises.
Agreed, Q was a psychological operation run by a small group in military intelligence. Ultimately, military intelligence does not make the final decisions.
Yes, Q wanted us to trust the plan, however the plan was just a plan and when plans hit the real world sometimes they stumble.
I am guessing that the military doesn’t want conflict in the streets of America and so they’re trying to resolve this in a peaceful way.
One thing that tells me that the globalists have started to realize that they are not getting their way is that left wing Antifa types are still rioting in the streets. That rioting is being done as a threat to those who dare are to consider or examine election fraud.
Who knows where the bodies are buried?
Do you trust General Flynn?
Fake and gay.
So you're saying Q is fake, the military wasn't behind Trump, and he had to try and convince them at the very last minute to overturn the election? mmmmk
If the generals wouldn't let Trump stay in power and invoke the insurrection act, because they were hardcore constitutionalists... Then what part of the constitution gives them the power absent authority of the Commander In Chief to occupy DC and hold tribunals?