I haven’t felt this kind and level of anger since I was a teenager. I’m at the point where I just drop friends like nothing if they’re overtly anti-Trump or Q
You think Jet fuel is effective and affordable? It's got nothing on a couple pieces of flaming debris! Cleanest, quickest way to drop a building in its own footprint for just a few $ worth of office supplies and a match.
It wasn’t jet fuel, it was airplanes flying at crazy speeds causing mechanical strain/heat to the frame. Every bend a paper clip back and forth til and breaks and feel how hot they get?
Not saying there weren’t also explosives placed. But no one thinks jet fuel caused the buildings to go down “.
3 towers came down on 9/11. one was not hit by a plane, this was building 7. all three towers, 1,2 and 7 were the first steel skyscrapers in human history to collapse directly into their footprint due to ‘fire’. Statistically impossible all 3 would collapse in this way unlike any other fire in a steel skyscraper in the world, all on the same day.
I feel like I’m in bizzaro world, I don’t remember people talking about building 7 before today. Probably because in the 9/11 days I was still watching misleadia.
Oh yes they fuckin do. Also do a comparison of the materials and see just how plausible it would be for it to do damage... then walk back those finings to the impact speed and ask yourself why if they were blowing well passed their VMO was there no obvious structural damage to the planes before impact.
Even "weakening the integrity" would not have caused a free-fall implosion.
If you think THIS is confirmation you should watch "Ultimate Q Proofs" on Bitchute or Rumble. Used to be on Youtube but they 1984'd it in Jan. which is how you know it's good.
Real action is perp walks and executions, not more talk of secret signals, not more of Jim jordan, not more trans rights, not more of Rand paul, none of them matter anymore.
Public arrests followed by executions for the guilty are the only thing that matter to me anymore. Everything else is just noisy speculation.
Whew, part of intelligence is being able to draw information from the smaller, more subtle clues. Trump's gesture is neither small nor subtle. It is full-bodied and brightly lit and enthusiastic and emphasized.
And you still don't get it?
You need some ice water to awaken you. Smelling the coffee isn't doing it.
It's a rather unusual and peculiar hand gesture to make, not the circle alone, but with the short diagonal stroke in just the right place, isn't it?
I recall a couple folks online saying this was the last straw for them to accepting the reality of Q. For others it was the one aboard AF1 with Trump seated and and his team standing around the desk, all giving thumbs up—with thumbs all carefully positioned in the exact shape of a large Q—and bearing the image tag DOITQ, no less ♥
No Name's death. Drop was 30 days and to the minute oh his official death time. Then the "every dog has its day" reference tied to the day after his death. It's National Happy Dog Day.
My only concern with some of the "Q proofs" is that it you look for something to validate something, you will be able to find plenty of supporting "data". The man-made global warming people do it all the time. This "confirmation bias" happens in all sorts of things, like when you buy a new car, you will then notice that make and model ALL OVER THE PLACE :)
How many coincidences before it's scientifically impossible? It's very clear to me that the Q team works very closely with Trump, and he went to great lengths to ensure that is clear, while maintaining plausible deniability.
You are right; most of that global warming crap has been exposed to be very carefully picked data trends from very specific times, ignoring the rest of the data (i.e. manipulation) ... simply taking a step back and viewing the full data clearly debunks it, which is relevant here too.
Your concern is well founded, and we should always keep our eyes open ... which is why I find it very good that this community is very critical when accepting confirmations/proofs (to defend against exactly that).
However, there is a tremendous amount of signaling going on by both sides, so capturing information and discussing it on these forums often helps others find relations or previously ignored signals. People often seem to confuse data gathering with blind acceptance.
Please watch the video I linked. There should be a part where they do the math (several times, with different approaches) of exactly what you are saying, and the result is so tremendously unlikely, it punches past the line of "scientific impossibility".
Many of Q's early posts focused on confirmation and "teaching coms", i.e. how they were going to communicate (e.g. maps, or mapping events in the news/tweets to posts graphically for others to learn/critique). Many early maps were wrong (if you read the raw posts on 8kun [warning: it's a jungle out there, and is often very .... spicy]), and Q or other Anons often correct the author and push in the needed direction.
Also, not every Q post is meant to be a confirmation. Most are informative, or a way for those up top to speak to the Digital Army in plausibly deniable code (think like a novel with the pages in random order; some things have happened, others haven't, yet others are bound to be repeated). Q was very clear on the confirmations "Who posted first?" (Always Q). Also make sure to watch the zero-delta segment. That part really convinced me that someone on the Q team (could be Scavino?) is physically close to Trump almost every day (I forget the usual time period, but the video should also cover that).
I apologize in advance if any of the stuff I referenced are not in that video, as I've done quite a bit of research on this topic (as I was originally quite sceptical, just like you) and the data are all starting to run together in my head. Ping me if anything is missing and I'll look back through some of my other bookmarks for you.
In my opinion, Q was not about predicting the future; the Q operation was run to counter the MSM/CIA project Mockingbird, to create confusion that exposes the Globalists (tilting battlefields in SpecOps' favor), and to ensure many Patriots did not give up, or take matters into their own hands violently. (Again, just my personal opinion. I dont have any special source)
And if that doesn't convince you, more power to you: the Q movement is very clear about Thinking For Yourself. Even if you disagree with me (/us), at least you have accomplished this and are now awake and searching :) Congrats and enjoy the show.
I admit that most of the "Q proofs" are hard to dismiss as coincidence, but many seem to EASILY be dismissed as coincidence. I would rather they pull the ones that seem too likely to be coincidence, even if it is just coincidence that they appear to be coincidence :)
How Trump signed the back of VIPAnon's picture with him was pretty good, but everyone has their own opinions.
The triple zero-delta discussed at about the 45min mark of the video meant alot to me.
But watching the MSM go absolutely nuts about Q says speaks volumes to me. Especially given how amazingly wrong the MSM has been and are obviously trying to cover up anything that breaks their narrative. The reaction (or over-reaction) often is the biggest tell.
If Tony Stark or Bruce Wayne were real, how would they address the question of Iron Man or Batman and the accusation that they could be their alter-ego? The same way President Trump answered the Q question @ 1:30
I joined telegram this week...at least I "think" I did. Each time I try to "open" it on my desktop (where I downloaded it), it tells me to "rotate my device". LOL Also, when I can manage to get something to come up, I can't find any "home" page, just a "chat" I must have joined. What am I doing wrong. Oh...when I tried to open it on my cell phone, I get the message "a code will be sent to your other device"....which is my laptop! LOL
Thank you, telegram links never work for me.
He also makes an air Q when talking about "the calm before the storm". Look for Trump's hand in the first few seconds.
https://youtu.be/tLwN0AFCi9k
He done this at other rallies, pointed out Q's in the crowd, and also traced a 17 at one but I can't find that clip anywhere.
u/#Catdance
That's kinda awesome. Thanks for showing it.
Oh yes POTUS#45/#19
Is Definitely
Q+
He would often throw out these Air " Q "bombs At rallies
WWG1WGA
Psshhh... don't you know it's customary to explicitly and blatantly spell out the letter Q when gesturing to a crowd? It's all a Qincidence, people!
..../sarcasm
I'm not sure how much more clearly people need to see. At this point they'll (normies) need literal words out of the mouth to believe it.
And they'll still say it's a LARP. I don't agree with blind faith trust in the plan, but I've seen enough to know it ain't no fuckin LARP.
Don't be angry at them, our job is to make them not panic when the time comes, not make them understand Q.
If Q wanted full saturation, Q would do so.
If Trump wanted all his followers to follow Q he can just say so, he obviously doesn't till now. Relax and enjoy the show
I haven’t felt this kind and level of anger since I was a teenager. I’m at the point where I just drop friends like nothing if they’re overtly anti-Trump or Q
we ARE nuts compared to the norm, just like 7 foot tall NBA players are freaks.
It's only half bad ;)
I need a gorillion bagillion irrefutable proofs and even then I'll still call it a LARP
-People who think jet fuel brought down the world trade center
Gorillion baguillion!!!
Baguettillion.
That's always bugged me. If jet fuel was so effective, why don't demolition companies use it. It's way cheaper than high explosives / C4 / SEMTEX....
You think Jet fuel is effective and affordable? It's got nothing on a couple pieces of flaming debris! Cleanest, quickest way to drop a building in its own footprint for just a few $ worth of office supplies and a match.
This pede arsons. Kek
Building 7, LOL!
It wasn’t jet fuel, it was airplanes flying at crazy speeds causing mechanical strain/heat to the frame. Every bend a paper clip back and forth til and breaks and feel how hot they get?
Not saying there weren’t also explosives placed. But no one thinks jet fuel caused the buildings to go down “.
tell that to Building 7
You lost me on that reference, but I’m happy to read about.
It wasn't just the twin towers that buckled. A nearby building that wasn't hit fell the same way. No jetfuel, no big planes smashing. Same fate.
Did they allege that to be a shockwave? Or what? I don’t remember hearing about that, but I was 20 years younger too.
Edit: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/most-americans-who-see-collapse-of-building-7-doubt-official-story-survey-finds-300914145.html
No WAY did fires take down that building wth.
3 towers came down on 9/11. one was not hit by a plane, this was building 7. all three towers, 1,2 and 7 were the first steel skyscrapers in human history to collapse directly into their footprint due to ‘fire’. Statistically impossible all 3 would collapse in this way unlike any other fire in a steel skyscraper in the world, all on the same day.
I feel like I’m in bizzaro world, I don’t remember people talking about building 7 before today. Probably because in the 9/11 days I was still watching misleadia.
Here's some good info on bldg 7. Also, check out the part in article how the guy (Silverstein) made a bunch of money off the insurance policy.
https://911review.com/attack/wtc/b7.html
Oh yes they fuckin do. Also do a comparison of the materials and see just how plausible it would be for it to do damage... then walk back those finings to the impact speed and ask yourself why if they were blowing well passed their VMO was there no obvious structural damage to the planes before impact.
Even "weakening the integrity" would not have caused a free-fall implosion.
Who actually thinks it’s jet fuel? May a hand ful of retards out there, but I’ve never encountered any that weren’t trying to troll.
That and the already proven support demolitions performed at the bottom will take a building down
If you think THIS is confirmation you should watch "Ultimate Q Proofs" on Bitchute or Rumble. Used to be on Youtube but they 1984'd it in Jan. which is how you know it's good.
Real action would be confirmation.
This is more speculation. It's good speculation but it definitely is NOT a confirmation.
You better be willing to do that for yourself
Real action is perp walks and executions, not more talk of secret signals, not more of Jim jordan, not more trans rights, not more of Rand paul, none of them matter anymore.
Public arrests followed by executions for the guilty are the only thing that matter to me anymore. Everything else is just noisy speculation.
Whew, part of intelligence is being able to draw information from the smaller, more subtle clues. Trump's gesture is neither small nor subtle. It is full-bodied and brightly lit and enthusiastic and emphasized.
And you still don't get it?
You need some ice water to awaken you. Smelling the coffee isn't doing it.
When smellimg the coffee doesn't do it, snort the coQaine.
It's a rather unusual and peculiar hand gesture to make, not the circle alone, but with the short diagonal stroke in just the right place, isn't it?
I recall a couple folks online saying this was the last straw for them to accepting the reality of Q. For others it was the one aboard AF1 with Trump seated and and his team standing around the desk, all giving thumbs up—with thumbs all carefully positioned in the exact shape of a large Q—and bearing the image tag DOITQ, no less ♥
It was the 17 flags for me. That moment when it clicked for me was... wild.
AF1 once used Q0 as a callsign while transporting Trump. 0 key on a phone dial screen also has + on it.
Loved that one!
No Name's death. Drop was 30 days and to the minute oh his official death time. Then the "every dog has its day" reference tied to the day after his death. It's National Happy Dog Day.
Yeah, that wad yuge!
Okay, I'll admit I'm a 1 foot in the Q rabbit hole, and 1 foot outside it...
But that is a very abnormal hand motion, very much so... One might even say, deliberate....
Here, let me give you a fren-ly helping shove to get you all-in: https://greatawakening.win/p/11S0gMiK4i/ultimate-q-proofs--uploaded-on-m/c/
See you on the other side :)
My only concern with some of the "Q proofs" is that it you look for something to validate something, you will be able to find plenty of supporting "data". The man-made global warming people do it all the time. This "confirmation bias" happens in all sorts of things, like when you buy a new car, you will then notice that make and model ALL OVER THE PLACE :)
How many coincidences before it's scientifically impossible? It's very clear to me that the Q team works very closely with Trump, and he went to great lengths to ensure that is clear, while maintaining plausible deniability.
You are right; most of that global warming crap has been exposed to be very carefully picked data trends from very specific times, ignoring the rest of the data (i.e. manipulation) ... simply taking a step back and viewing the full data clearly debunks it, which is relevant here too.
Your concern is well founded, and we should always keep our eyes open ... which is why I find it very good that this community is very critical when accepting confirmations/proofs (to defend against exactly that).
However, there is a tremendous amount of signaling going on by both sides, so capturing information and discussing it on these forums often helps others find relations or previously ignored signals. People often seem to confuse data gathering with blind acceptance.
Please watch the video I linked. There should be a part where they do the math (several times, with different approaches) of exactly what you are saying, and the result is so tremendously unlikely, it punches past the line of "scientific impossibility".
Many of Q's early posts focused on confirmation and "teaching coms", i.e. how they were going to communicate (e.g. maps, or mapping events in the news/tweets to posts graphically for others to learn/critique). Many early maps were wrong (if you read the raw posts on 8kun [warning: it's a jungle out there, and is often very .... spicy]), and Q or other Anons often correct the author and push in the needed direction.
Also, not every Q post is meant to be a confirmation. Most are informative, or a way for those up top to speak to the Digital Army in plausibly deniable code (think like a novel with the pages in random order; some things have happened, others haven't, yet others are bound to be repeated). Q was very clear on the confirmations "Who posted first?" (Always Q). Also make sure to watch the zero-delta segment. That part really convinced me that someone on the Q team (could be Scavino?) is physically close to Trump almost every day (I forget the usual time period, but the video should also cover that).
I apologize in advance if any of the stuff I referenced are not in that video, as I've done quite a bit of research on this topic (as I was originally quite sceptical, just like you) and the data are all starting to run together in my head. Ping me if anything is missing and I'll look back through some of my other bookmarks for you.
In my opinion, Q was not about predicting the future; the Q operation was run to counter the MSM/CIA project Mockingbird, to create confusion that exposes the Globalists (tilting battlefields in SpecOps' favor), and to ensure many Patriots did not give up, or take matters into their own hands violently. (Again, just my personal opinion. I dont have any special source)
And if that doesn't convince you, more power to you: the Q movement is very clear about Thinking For Yourself. Even if you disagree with me (/us), at least you have accomplished this and are now awake and searching :) Congrats and enjoy the show.
I admit that most of the "Q proofs" are hard to dismiss as coincidence, but many seem to EASILY be dismissed as coincidence. I would rather they pull the ones that seem too likely to be coincidence, even if it is just coincidence that they appear to be coincidence :)
How Trump signed the back of VIPAnon's picture with him was pretty good, but everyone has their own opinions.
The triple zero-delta discussed at about the 45min mark of the video meant alot to me.
But watching the MSM go absolutely nuts about Q says speaks volumes to me. Especially given how amazingly wrong the MSM has been and are obviously trying to cover up anything that breaks their narrative. The reaction (or over-reaction) often is the biggest tell.
I appreciate what you said! Thank you for that well thought out explanation!
Weeee!
I included some statistics on this one. Odds of being random are vanishingly small.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hRGrpkEV/qproof-trump-and-q-arent-gonna-h/
telegram links are horrid. just screen shot and poat source in comments plz
Here's the video file without needing to be on Telegram. → https://streamable.com/sj54xt
It’s a video lol, I don’t have telegram tho!!
No, that's no proof, because he is not drawing the 'plus' sign!
(Just kidding about how creative many sheepy people are not wanting to see the evidence in front of them.)
That is not from this year
Whenever I saw this gesture, I thought:
To point to someone out in the crowd.
Please convince people with proofs like the eagle on top the flag, and not this weak shit.
Plz post pic for us plebs
What am i missing? This is super old...
I thought the Mods were removing Telegram links because they are unverifiable?
Not this year
I can understand the circular motion but the little dash would throw me off - that is assuming Q isn't true.
If Tony Stark or Bruce Wayne were real, how would they address the question of Iron Man or Batman and the accusation that they could be their alter-ego? The same way President Trump answered the Q question @ 1:30
https://youtu.be/XWVNkHQtdbw
It looks more like a G to me
"Does this look like a Q to you? How about now?"
https://youtu.be/KLfCDPi_Zic?t=911 time 15:12 to 15:14
link doesnt work
Its more like thank you all.... and you... and YOU
QaNON is protected under the LGBTQ group is my faovurite way to troll leftie twitter
Total confirmation!!!
BOOM!!!??
He did it during his speech too
LOVE it!!!!
How can we not love this man?????
this is our secret handshake. or shall i say air q-five.
I joined telegram this week...at least I "think" I did. Each time I try to "open" it on my desktop (where I downloaded it), it tells me to "rotate my device". LOL Also, when I can manage to get something to come up, I can't find any "home" page, just a "chat" I must have joined. What am I doing wrong. Oh...when I tried to open it on my cell phone, I get the message "a code will be sent to your other device"....which is my laptop! LOL
I wonder how long he practiced that!