This lady was fired for having a conceal carry permit, not a gun. She was considered a security risk and escorted outside like a criminal. She should sue.
(media.greatawakening.win)
🧠 These people are stupid!
nice...? get a good lawyer and you prob wont have to work again
This^, early retirement.
“Shall not be infringed” also applies to requiring a license. They just proved licenses can be weaponized by the state to punish law abiding citizens. Wait until they start firing people with registered ARs. People are saying the gun grab won’t happen by groups coming to your door. I believe it will be to slowly exile gun ownership from society via economic starvation .
Unfortunately you work for IDIOTS, but no matter. Hire a good Attorney and sue sue sue. They will settle for $Millions for lots of civil rights violations.
Who registers a gun?
(Besides when you have to give all your info with the background check...it's the same as registering anyway)
Who submits to a background check?
THIS
do you resist physically ? or just by being luckily in one of the few states left on Hearth where you can do that ?
Private sales, or go to a city gun buy-back and buy one from someone turning a gun in for a gas card. Give the person more than the city and the gun is yours.
Same as drivers license
True, but to play devil's advocate for driving:
A) It definitely is a skill with some serious consequences for having that skill impeded by illegal substances
B) Your stolen tax money pays for the roads so of course they need to make you go through a process to gain the ability to use that which you pay for
Exactly this.
Came here to say this. What she needs is a GREAT lawyer to sue them into oblivion. A warning to any org/business wanting to do such fuckery.
If any lawyers are brave enough to potentially become Harrison Dealt with
There should be a different avenue for resolution. Any time a city or state gets sued and pays out, that is TAXPAYER money, it isn't government money from some inexhaustible, non-taxpayer source. I agree, she should file a lawsuit, but having your neighbors pay for something the city did is not the right way to address this. It is no different than the house of representatives paying out from their "indiscretion" pool to pay out to interns that have had affairs with jackholes in the house.
Having city people bonded/insured and such would make the payout come from them vs the city itself. That way they will be more cautious about making illegal decisions like this, as they would have to deal with the repercussions personally.
I think you are on to something here fren. We need to implement this legal strategy of going after these people individually if they are bonded. When it affects their ability to be gainfully employed, then they may think twice before doing crap like this. You are right. As it now stands, they could care less because the taxpayer is the one that picks up the tab for their bad behavior.
Agreed. The current systems of monetary punishment for illegal/immoral activity is just as destructive as some of the current systems of financial reward. Businesses using inferior parts that cause their products to be dangerous to consumers look good to their shareholders, but when caught and fined just raise the price of their products, passing the pain back onto consumers' backs. Hospital systems, currently under beast control, offer financial incentives for killing their patients (think Remdesivir and respirators). Again, good people suffer the brunt of these policies.
I believe there was an issue in Florida where DeSantis put some law in place where commissioners could have their personal property confiscated if they participated in their stereotypical corrupt behavior. Guess how quickly the beasts stopped trying to pull that BS?
I just did a search on this. It's an OLD story from 2018
https://www.wsls.com/news/2018/03/27/police-reports-body-cam-footage-shed-light-on-firing-of-roanoke-dss-worker/
I see absolutely nothing about her ever going to court and challenging her firing. Nothing past 2018 except for other recycling of this story.
And sue the police department also
Are pd’s normally corporate goons. Seems like terminating someone is a company matter. “Are they killing someone right now? No? Then you don’t have “ standing” to call the police. Bye bye”.
"Are pd’s normally corporate goons."
This is literally all they are. Sheriffs are the only Constitutionally legitimate law enforcement. Police enforce policies of corporations.
This is a lawsuit she will win, may have to appeal a few times but she will win in the long run
Seens like an infringement of her 2nd amendment.
People in that city should protest this and also remove whoever made that call to do it
The whole point of the permit is that the government determined she’s not a safety risk. These people must be incapable of reasoning beyond “ooga booga gun bad gun people bad”
This was in 2018. Sad because i was going to find the number and give them a piece of my mind
Does she have a drivers license? She could drive a car through a crowd.
Make this woman rich.
The "law" is their weapon against us.
She was fired because she was a bad employee. She got bad performance reviews along with not meeting the attendance and dress code policies. She was still in a probation period and didn't make the cut. She's just trying to stir up things because she wants to be a spokesman for the NRA. Link to the termination paperwork.
Were those police officers armed or own a conceal/carry permit?
Safety risk to the building & all...
I would love to be a lawyer right about now she's going to make some $$
Reminder that most cops are pussies who will just do as they are told. Don’t back the blue.
Dam she hot AF too. I'd conceal my junk in that box!
Amen.
her name is "Storm Durham"
wtf
Why are we seeing a 4 year old story with no sauce?
https://www.wsls.com/news/2018/03/27/police-reports-body-cam-footage-shed-light-on-firing-of-roanoke-dss-worker/
Because people like to feel enraged over things?
She’s gonna get a better job. She’s pretty and smart.
OH -' and tge idiotic cops are NOT?
Pure libtard stupidity . . .
Sue them silly! Having a CCP does not constitute a "safety risk to the building" if one is not carrying. (the gun Social Services idiots; not the permit).
An ethical expert lawyer, a fren, with a bunch of notches in his belt should grasp this case by the horns and gouge those bigots with the same.
Poor little cutie.
But the three armed officers...not so much. Liberal logic.
Good for her,now she can leave that commie cesspool .....
Sounds like the city is a safety risk to you. If you can't exercise your rights as a citizen of the U.S. without being discriminated against, then perhaps you need to engage the services of a really good constitutional lawyer? You have a concealed carry permit because you're a law abiding citizen but they can fire you because having a piece of paper means you're a risk? To whom? On the other hand, they are more than a risk to you. They're preventing you from earning a living doing what you're good at which is helping people.
My guess is the party in control is Democrat and the people in charge are woke as hell. Am I right? I think they need to learn a few needed lessons, first in Constitutional law, then in employment law, then at the ballot box.
It is generally understood that this means she has passed a background check that confirms her probity and trustworthiness. The opposite of a "safety risk."
Well, I'll bet THAT makes the kids a LOT safer.
your concealed weapons permit isn't other people's business. How did her workplace find out about her permit? Probably opened her big mouth.
This is sad that Roanoke only had one Patriot employed there, and that Patriot is fired.
If an employee has a means to use the First amendment, they too should be fired. So all with tw1tr or fb, bye bye.