And a gold heist
Insurance fraud
Destruction of records in building seven
Implementation of the pre written patriot act which removed freedoms to this day
Mass murder of Americans, 3000 on the day plus 50,000 later from radiation poisoning and cancer
Justification for invasion of Iraq to protect the petrodollar and mass murder of a million innocent Iraqi civilians
Elimination of asbestos removal problem which would have cost a billion
Erection of “one world” tower as a Masonic oblieisk symbolic of their new world order.
Still, they’ve outdone themselves this time, killing billions with their jabs and implementing their one world Covid pass social credit score system.
If we do nothing and let them.
Personally, if the sheep wake up that they’ve been duped into killing their own kids, I wouldn’t want to be near a Masonic temple in future.
Sad but true - this whole concept of "waking up the normies" is false. People are sheep. They are acted upon by those with power. Real change in a country comes from a small group of determined insurgents normally who have backing at the highest levels of power. Mussolini, Hitler, Lenin. etc
George Washington was a British general and many of his colleagues in the continental congress and were the elite of North American society who had significant financial means of their own.
I was awakened by trying to prove the 911 conspiracy to be wrong. Once i realized how wrong i was about everything it truly opened my eyes. Man is fallen.
It didn't, the dust was pulverized concrete. The steel was shipped away and melted down. Instead of what investigators do with say.. plane crashes.. lay it out in a hanger to identify the problem. Nope, evidence was melted down STAT.
Fortunately there are still pictures of steel beams with clear cuts from thermite
Careful with that. this image is framed as A huge steel beam from the south tower falters, turns to “dust” and blows away, but the image when viewed in the footage shows the beam fell down in those frames. You can see the beam getting lower in the last 2 frames, the dust that settled on them is what's blowing away because the beam fell quickly to the bottom of the frame.
Settle on what you can prove, and we can prove that the official investigation is false and didn't examine explosive evidence. So a new investigation needs to examine that
It has "World Trade Center Building 7 Evaluation" by the University of Fairbanks Alaska, and "9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out (Free 1-hour version) AE911Truth.org" a base case to open a re-investigation
A while back on here I thought i saw a documentary about the findings of the scientists who were hired by the family of a 911 victim from the UK and it was even a documentary that an old hollywood actor had helped with or narrated or soemthing. I want to say it was called “Unthinkable” or something. Anyone remember this?
If we got arrests and could prove to the normies how this all went down, it would be the mother of all redpills. If this event was a lie, then everything that came after it was a lie as well.
It makes me wonder if after 911 that is when Trump and the white hats made the plan.
To be honest, I doubt you could make plans to take down and destroy bloodlines that have been ruling the world for over 1000 years in just 12 - 15 years. It probably indeed started not long after JFK was assassinated. That takes decades, finding their funding and marking it for the taking, identifying puppets and puppet masters, analyzing their techniques and coming up with ways to counter.
Just playing devil's advocate here with the official narrative. Wouldnt a collapsing floor from above force all of the air and debris out the side windows in the same manner an explosion would?
how does a steel framed structure collapse, say, 20-30 floors below the impact, and become weakened all the way down to the ground floor so that it follows the clear uniform pattern of ejection from air pressure all the way down?
There's only one answer to this. It wouldn't have done that. The expectation was that if (and that's a big if) it was going to fall, it would fall into its weakened side, and the top would fall over and yes it might bring a few floors with it, but the bottom would generally be intact.
It's difficult to deny the lateral ejection of material that sent things blocks away. It's difficult to deny the explosive evidence.
It's only when you find out what was on the office floors that were both hit at the towers, what agencies were operating in building 7, at what was housed in the exact point the missile, sorry Airplane, that hit the Pentagon do you start to unravel the why's.
People that tell me that the aviation fuel weakened the steel beams (beside it being built as a column within a column structure) and travelled down the elevator shafts understand nothing. Firstly none of the aircraft would have full fuel, airlines just don't fly around the world with full fuel tanks! There's enough for the planned flight duration, with extra for their planned divert and a minimum amount needed on board on landing. These aircraft were flying for over an hour, and wouldn't have left with full tanks.
Even if some of the fuel had escaped and whooshed around the indie of the building, aviation kerosene isn't particularly flammable unless compressed then ignited. The bizarre theory that it could burn long enough and hot enough to melt steel is a joke. Anyone who say's so probable shouldn't light a woodstove or a heating oil boiler for any length of time!
But it's the aviation aspect which is most telling. The official report has the aircraft travelling at speeds so far outside the envelope (VMO or Velocity Max Operating) that the airframe would have ripped itself apart before hitting the towers. To think a 757 could put out enough thrust at sea level to power the aircraft to such speed is also simply impossible, let alone a rookie pilot actually hand flying the radar plots they put out in the official reports.
And so much more. In my opinion the aircraft were took over remotely, and yes the technology was there decades before 2001 to do so. Once remotely flown, there could be nothing the aircrew could do to over-ride it, even pulling breakers or engine restarts would not have stopped it.
The official report has the aircraft travelling at speeds so far outside the envelope (VMO or Velocity Max Operating) that the airframe would have ripped itself apart before hitting the towers.
Look fren, the descending 360' turn made with the aircraft that allegedly hit the Pentagon, coming in at ground level is pretty much impossible even for pilots on heavy's with 1000's of hours, let alone someone who couldn't get clearance for solo in a Cessna! The input on the controls would have been so minimal you wouldn't be able to tell, just think it and you'd probably over control it!
"So they made that portion up for what purpose?"
Because whoever wrote it, they weren't airline pilots, and needed the radar plot to match the story, because the airframes were being flown remotely!
I could go on to the black boxes, the edited frames of the Pentagon car park barrier video we have, the cell phones apparently working on the aircraft at 32,000' the ground speeds and more.
Because wowever wrote it they weren't airline pilots, and needed the radar plot to match the story, because the airframes were being flown remotely!
Thank you fren.
I could go on to the black boxes, the edited frames of the Pentagon car park barrier video we have, the cell phones apparently working on the aircraft at 32,000' the ground speeds and more.
No need, I already know it was a FF. Just asking why they made up that one portion of the speeds. I wonder how many legit pilots read that and said wtf?
I can't for remember off the top of my head the airspeeds quoted, but I recall them being way outside Velocity Max Operating and off the chart for any safety factor, something in the region of 140 Kts IAS over VMO. The airframe would have ripped itself apart, with wing flutter, resonance and other nasty's!
Weirdly, yesterday I posted this link about the Empire State buliding being hit by a military plane in 1945. I discovered that this even happened by watching an episode of "The Waltons" depicting World War 2 with my grandchildren on a rainy Independence Day. The kids asked me if that really happened and we turned to the internet and this came up.
I was glued to the TV during 9/11 - watched everything and not one time did I ever hear or see anyone talk of a plane hitting the ESB - wouldnt that have been, if not relevant, at least worth a mention? The differences in the outcome of these two incidents is astounding - the integrity of the ESB was not compromised and stands today. An easy read about a historic event.
It was so obvious. I pushed for years, but after 2-3 years the mainstream media got into it's grove of screeching 'conspiracy theory' to anyone question its narrative. After 10 years the news asserted its 2001 position, but the people waking up was slow. I kept pressing on for 20 years right into the covid BS. I made a ton of people angry and got banned by simply asking questions and using facts to point out how explosives are the only possible angle to account for this. I learned MetaBunk is a dangerous place where activists push the narrative of MSM and assert it, and shut down questions (it's a hive of BS).
There just weren't enough people to wake up, and the media steamrolled over it with their own 'facts' and version of history.
I'm glad you are here and awake. But DON'T STOP PUSHING THE TRUTH. 9/11 is too old now to be an effective front line, but the election and the vaccine and the NWO/LWO and Deep State are the new front line, with other things. Stay on top, and don't let MSM get away with it youngAnons. The MSM's mission is to memory hole their crimes, and brand anyone asking questions or speaking facts 'misinformation agent' 'disinformation agent' 'conspiracy theorist' and every other form of mockery or label they can think of.
CGI, shown on TV, made it appear that planes hit WTC. The reality is, that bombs were exploded in both the upper floors and basement. Ones on upper floors in a pattern that compliments CGI - shown ONLY on TV. No eye witnesses saw actual planes...if they said they did, they're lying, albeit unintentionally due to watching TV news. Several firefighters etc confirmed explosions like controlled demo heard.
Buildings came straight down in controlled demolition. Anyone telling you jet fuel melted steel to the extent to liquify and freefall, is a fucktard. That building could withstand multiple 747 collisions and still remain standing. Interview with original architect confirms (interview before 9/11)
Guliani in regards to WTC 7: "... that's when we made the decision to pull it." This verifies all WTC buildings were wired up for demolition in advance. It takes weeks to wire up.
Pentagon - Shown only once, newscaster on scene states that there's no way a plane crashed into building, admits there's absolutely no aircraft debris. This is before they scattered random parts and crap around the grounds using parts that don't belong to any alleged planes cited.
Pennsylvania - Blew a hole in the ground and tried to tell us a passenger jet crashed there. Complete bs.
Planes melted buildings, but passports of alleged brown terrorists are found in the rubble. GTFOOH
Also: Rumsfeld on 9/10, "We can't account for 2.3 Trillion dollars..."
Don't forget jit boy reading My pet goat
True - but I also remember Guliani specifically saying the exact words, "... that's when we made the decision to pull it." In regards to WTC 7. I don't remember if it was on 9/11 or at a press conference after, but he did say those words.
And Guliani wasn't the person who said "Let's pull it"! Since I've destroyed two of your 6 points easily, I have no doubt the other 4 are just as reliable.
I have co-workers who were at their job, at a facility on the Hudson River, almost directly across the river from WTC, who went outside after the first tower was hit, and WATCHED THE 2ND JET COME DOWN THE HUDSON, MAKE THE U-TURN, AND THEN FLY INTO THE SOUTH TOWER! I guess it was a giant holographic image (the screen they had to have put in the river to make the holographic image appear to people on the NJ side must have been huge!)
I don't know, but I'll see if I can locate the video that shows the Tower exploding in the shape of the plane, with no plane in sight. I'll also see if I can locate the architect interview pre-911 talking about how those towers could withstand multiple jumbo jet impacts and be ok. There's also another video with CGI glitch showing the left wing of CGI plane going right through an adjacent building, which is an impossibility. If you've ever seen a jet after bird strike, you'd know there's no way they breached WTC like that. (Not anyone specifically, mind you.) Keep in mind we're all doing the best we can here while continuously being treated like mushrooms... we're all on the same side, fam. 🙂
Maybe it was a cruise missile? All the videos you see were sent to the news, and they subsequently added the aircraft into them. Now that we have smart phones with constant internet access, it would be basically impossible to do the same thing again.
Hell, there was a British reporter that said tower 7 had collapsed when you could clearly see it in the background.
Why couldn't they evacuate every building in the worst-case scenario footprint around the WTC complex, wait for the last of the survivors to evacuate the towers, clear and check that the entire area is clear of everyone (except the fire and detonation crew), then blow up a tower, wait for the smoke to settle, then repeat with the other tower?
I faced the same from a lot of people pushing back against the truth. Glad you're with us today. Hopefully it makes you think twice when things happen, and wait to get all the information.
I understood it was fishy when they found a passport in the smoking rumble. Yeah sure: knowing that jet fuel will never burn hot enough to melt the WTC steel but it did, then it did not vaporize a frigging Saudi passport? Tssk.
Correct. I heard that it could be gvmt but never looked into it. This video, theres obviously something wrong. The physics arent acting like the official story says. Wow to say the least.
And a gold heist Insurance fraud Destruction of records in building seven Implementation of the pre written patriot act which removed freedoms to this day Mass murder of Americans, 3000 on the day plus 50,000 later from radiation poisoning and cancer Justification for invasion of Iraq to protect the petrodollar and mass murder of a million innocent Iraqi civilians Elimination of asbestos removal problem which would have cost a billion Erection of “one world” tower as a Masonic oblieisk symbolic of their new world order.
Still, they’ve outdone themselves this time, killing billions with their jabs and implementing their one world Covid pass social credit score system.
If we do nothing and let them.
Personally, if the sheep wake up that they’ve been duped into killing their own kids, I wouldn’t want to be near a Masonic temple in future.
Sad but true - this whole concept of "waking up the normies" is false. People are sheep. They are acted upon by those with power. Real change in a country comes from a small group of determined insurgents normally who have backing at the highest levels of power. Mussolini, Hitler, Lenin. etc
George Washington was a British general and many of his colleagues in the continental congress and were the elite of North American society who had significant financial means of their own.
Waking up the normies is literally the entire point of the Q operation so you can fuck right off with that holier than thou dooming.
There absolutely is such a thing as waking up the normies and it's happening every day and it happened to you and me at one point too.
I like your grit.
I was awakened by trying to prove the 911 conspiracy to be wrong. Once i realized how wrong i was about everything it truly opened my eyes. Man is fallen.
Haha building 7 was my red pill
That was a big part of it for me. Its still usable to this day as so few know about it.
Yep it's the easiest most undeniable red pill there is. It simply has no other explanation than demolition even to the staunchest normie
Steel doesn't turn to dust.
It didn't, the dust was pulverized concrete. The steel was shipped away and melted down. Instead of what investigators do with say.. plane crashes.. lay it out in a hanger to identify the problem. Nope, evidence was melted down STAT.
Fortunately there are still pictures of steel beams with clear cuts from thermite
This article explains how it happened.
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_170.htm
True or not, we'll probably never know.
Careful with that. this image is framed as A huge steel beam from the south tower falters, turns to “dust” and blows away, but the image when viewed in the footage shows the beam fell down in those frames. You can see the beam getting lower in the last 2 frames, the dust that settled on them is what's blowing away because the beam fell quickly to the bottom of the frame.
Settle on what you can prove, and we can prove that the official investigation is false and didn't examine explosive evidence. So a new investigation needs to examine that
I'd like to see a video of controlled demolition of a tall building to compare to this video.
There was at least one such comparison video of building 7.
Look at loose change from way back in 04 05 time frame. If you haven't seen it of course
Bad casts a spell….people can’t see through it. Truly you are blessed if you can. May God help us ❤️🇺🇸
Wow, what a tape.
https://youtu.be/l0Q5eZhCPuc
Well worth the time watching. Watched this several years ago. Then couldnt find it. It's back..... patriots in control Lots of INTERDASTING bits here.
This is also a great channel:
https://www.youtube.com/c/ae911truthvideos
It has "World Trade Center Building 7 Evaluation" by the University of Fairbanks Alaska, and "9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out (Free 1-hour version) AE911Truth.org" a base case to open a re-investigation
There's another long video if anyone is interested, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVYpZeH3Cqw is part 1, but part 2 and 3 are hard to find.
A while back on here I thought i saw a documentary about the findings of the scientists who were hired by the family of a 911 victim from the UK and it was even a documentary that an old hollywood actor had helped with or narrated or soemthing. I want to say it was called “Unthinkable” or something. Anyone remember this?
Was the actor the late William Hurt?
It's "The Unspeakable": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11RwCm_OaGc
I saw it, it is good supporting evidence to the main evidence.
Thats it! Thank you so much!
If we got arrests and could prove to the normies how this all went down, it would be the mother of all redpills. If this event was a lie, then everything that came after it was a lie as well.
It makes me wonder if after 911 that is when Trump and the white hats made the plan.
To be honest, I doubt you could make plans to take down and destroy bloodlines that have been ruling the world for over 1000 years in just 12 - 15 years. It probably indeed started not long after JFK was assassinated. That takes decades, finding their funding and marking it for the taking, identifying puppets and puppet masters, analyzing their techniques and coming up with ways to counter.
Just playing devil's advocate here with the official narrative. Wouldnt a collapsing floor from above force all of the air and debris out the side windows in the same manner an explosion would?
Lets say that's true.
Floor 1 was built to hold up 100+ floors.
Floor 50 was built to hod up 50+ floors.
The strike was in the 8x floor range.
how does a steel framed structure collapse, say, 20-30 floors below the impact, and become weakened all the way down to the ground floor so that it follows the clear uniform pattern of ejection from air pressure all the way down?
There's only one answer to this. It wouldn't have done that. The expectation was that if (and that's a big if) it was going to fall, it would fall into its weakened side, and the top would fall over and yes it might bring a few floors with it, but the bottom would generally be intact.
It's difficult to deny the lateral ejection of material that sent things blocks away. It's difficult to deny the explosive evidence.
It's only when you find out what was on the office floors that were both hit at the towers, what agencies were operating in building 7, at what was housed in the exact point the missile, sorry Airplane, that hit the Pentagon do you start to unravel the why's.
People that tell me that the aviation fuel weakened the steel beams (beside it being built as a column within a column structure) and travelled down the elevator shafts understand nothing. Firstly none of the aircraft would have full fuel, airlines just don't fly around the world with full fuel tanks! There's enough for the planned flight duration, with extra for their planned divert and a minimum amount needed on board on landing. These aircraft were flying for over an hour, and wouldn't have left with full tanks.
Even if some of the fuel had escaped and whooshed around the indie of the building, aviation kerosene isn't particularly flammable unless compressed then ignited. The bizarre theory that it could burn long enough and hot enough to melt steel is a joke. Anyone who say's so probable shouldn't light a woodstove or a heating oil boiler for any length of time!
But it's the aviation aspect which is most telling. The official report has the aircraft travelling at speeds so far outside the envelope (VMO or Velocity Max Operating) that the airframe would have ripped itself apart before hitting the towers. To think a 757 could put out enough thrust at sea level to power the aircraft to such speed is also simply impossible, let alone a rookie pilot actually hand flying the radar plots they put out in the official reports.
And so much more. In my opinion the aircraft were took over remotely, and yes the technology was there decades before 2001 to do so. Once remotely flown, there could be nothing the aircrew could do to over-ride it, even pulling breakers or engine restarts would not have stopped it.
There's been a lot of mental gymnastics to try justify the MSM narrative. I've seen them all, they all fail.
So they made that portion up for what purpose?
Look fren, the descending 360' turn made with the aircraft that allegedly hit the Pentagon, coming in at ground level is pretty much impossible even for pilots on heavy's with 1000's of hours, let alone someone who couldn't get clearance for solo in a Cessna! The input on the controls would have been so minimal you wouldn't be able to tell, just think it and you'd probably over control it!
"So they made that portion up for what purpose?"
Because whoever wrote it, they weren't airline pilots, and needed the radar plot to match the story, because the airframes were being flown remotely!
I could go on to the black boxes, the edited frames of the Pentagon car park barrier video we have, the cell phones apparently working on the aircraft at 32,000' the ground speeds and more.
Thank you fren.
No need, I already know it was a FF. Just asking why they made up that one portion of the speeds. I wonder how many legit pilots read that and said wtf?
Do you remember what the speeds were?
Lol I must fix that typo! "Wowever"
I can't for remember off the top of my head the airspeeds quoted, but I recall them being way outside Velocity Max Operating and off the chart for any safety factor, something in the region of 140 Kts IAS over VMO. The airframe would have ripped itself apart, with wing flutter, resonance and other nasty's!
I didn't even notice that misspelling, my mind read it as "however".
interdasting, you must be a planefag?
I noticed the misspelling "nasty's" (= belonging to nasty) instead of "nasties".
The grounds would give some form of resistance, even a minimal amount. What you see is a building falling at free fall speed, which = controlled demo
That's not what melted steel beams.
Wait until the sheep wake up to what lengths our government has gone to to further their agenda. The Bushes got ultra rich for this stunt
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1945_Empire_State_Building_B-25_crash#Details
Weirdly, yesterday I posted this link about the Empire State buliding being hit by a military plane in 1945. I discovered that this even happened by watching an episode of "The Waltons" depicting World War 2 with my grandchildren on a rainy Independence Day. The kids asked me if that really happened and we turned to the internet and this came up.
I was glued to the TV during 9/11 - watched everything and not one time did I ever hear or see anyone talk of a plane hitting the ESB - wouldnt that have been, if not relevant, at least worth a mention? The differences in the outcome of these two incidents is astounding - the integrity of the ESB was not compromised and stands today. An easy read about a historic event.
This was a few years after i woke up.
It was so obvious. I pushed for years, but after 2-3 years the mainstream media got into it's grove of screeching 'conspiracy theory' to anyone question its narrative. After 10 years the news asserted its 2001 position, but the people waking up was slow. I kept pressing on for 20 years right into the covid BS. I made a ton of people angry and got banned by simply asking questions and using facts to point out how explosives are the only possible angle to account for this. I learned MetaBunk is a dangerous place where activists push the narrative of MSM and assert it, and shut down questions (it's a hive of BS).
There just weren't enough people to wake up, and the media steamrolled over it with their own 'facts' and version of history.
I'm glad you are here and awake. But DON'T STOP PUSHING THE TRUTH. 9/11 is too old now to be an effective front line, but the election and the vaccine and the NWO/LWO and Deep State are the new front line, with other things. Stay on top, and don't let MSM get away with it youngAnons. The MSM's mission is to memory hole their crimes, and brand anyone asking questions or speaking facts 'misinformation agent' 'disinformation agent' 'conspiracy theorist' and every other form of mockery or label they can think of.
I also lost many « friends » in September 2001, Fren. WWG1WGA!
If you don’t think 9-11 was a False Flag, you are.a Fn moron.
Yup...
#3- that was Larry Silverstein, partial or complete owner of WTC 7 who said that
True - but I also remember Guliani specifically saying the exact words, "... that's when we made the decision to pull it." In regards to WTC 7. I don't remember if it was on 9/11 or at a press conference after, but he did say those words.
Anon, the no-planes theory is a discredit campaign, along with nuke theories.
The golden standard theory on 9/11 is the Fall of WTC7. It's a smoking demolition gun. With that it's easier to link the demolition to WTC1&2.
I should clarify. the no-plane (note: no s) theory is alive and well on the pentagon though.
Yup... WTC 7 definitely the strongest proof of phuckery and lies. God I hate what these aholes have done to our country.
And Guliani wasn't the person who said "Let's pull it"! Since I've destroyed two of your 6 points easily, I have no doubt the other 4 are just as reliable.
I have co-workers who were at their job, at a facility on the Hudson River, almost directly across the river from WTC, who went outside after the first tower was hit, and WATCHED THE 2ND JET COME DOWN THE HUDSON, MAKE THE U-TURN, AND THEN FLY INTO THE SOUTH TOWER! I guess it was a giant holographic image (the screen they had to have put in the river to make the holographic image appear to people on the NJ side must have been huge!)
I don't know, but I'll see if I can locate the video that shows the Tower exploding in the shape of the plane, with no plane in sight. I'll also see if I can locate the architect interview pre-911 talking about how those towers could withstand multiple jumbo jet impacts and be ok. There's also another video with CGI glitch showing the left wing of CGI plane going right through an adjacent building, which is an impossibility. If you've ever seen a jet after bird strike, you'd know there's no way they breached WTC like that. (Not anyone specifically, mind you.) Keep in mind we're all doing the best we can here while continuously being treated like mushrooms... we're all on the same side, fam. 🙂
Maybe it was a cruise missile? All the videos you see were sent to the news, and they subsequently added the aircraft into them. Now that we have smart phones with constant internet access, it would be basically impossible to do the same thing again.
Hell, there was a British reporter that said tower 7 had collapsed when you could clearly see it in the background.
The owner of the buildings said pull it, not Giuliani.
Why couldn't they evacuate every building in the worst-case scenario footprint around the WTC complex, wait for the last of the survivors to evacuate the towers, clear and check that the entire area is clear of everyone (except the fire and detonation crew), then blow up a tower, wait for the smoke to settle, then repeat with the other tower?
Nobody would dare enter a compromised building to demolish it.
https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/world-trade-center-physics
Another good one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ddz2mw2vaEg
My awakening. You'll never convince me the official story of 9/11 was even partly true
How depressing.
It was, 21 years ago, but now it’s time to expose the fraudsters and make them pay.
It’s a shame that Dick Cheney’s daughter pretends to become the next president.
Hey @penisse it won't play for me either.
Re-uploaded and tested: https://files.catbox.moe/pprq2z.mp4
Still won't play for me anon, I switched out my VPN as well. Hmmmm....... Anyone else having issues playing it?
Yup, none of the links dropped are playing for me.
Thanks, apple Mac no updates in 2 + yrs, multi hopping vpn.
I was having trouble playing it in Brave browser. It worked in Firefox.
Thanks.
Thanks fren.
It hurt me emotionally to accept that 9/11 was an inside job.
I faced the same from a lot of people pushing back against the truth. Glad you're with us today. Hopefully it makes you think twice when things happen, and wait to get all the information.
My thinking is - shootings in communist-controlled cities, mostly Chicago: crime. "School shootings" I already dismiss out of hand now.
I can't get it to play.
Re-uploaded and tested: https://files.catbox.moe/pprq2z.mp4
Still no play for me fren?
Download then use VLC, it worked for another Fren.
Still makes me fucking sick seeing that. Especially now that I'm awake. All those people slaughtered, and for what?
It wouldn't play for me in Brave browser, but it worked in firefox. IT's just footage from the tower collapse that you've seen 100 times already.
OK, thanks.
We have known, we are afraid to act.
Ive never seen this. After 2 years of redpilling by you guys its totally plausible its a false flag.
I understood it was fishy when they found a passport in the smoking rumble. Yeah sure: knowing that jet fuel will never burn hot enough to melt the WTC steel but it did, then it did not vaporize a frigging Saudi passport? Tssk.
https://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/how-hot.htm
Plausible? You not know about building 7?
Correct. I heard that it could be gvmt but never looked into it. This video, theres obviously something wrong. The physics arent acting like the official story says. Wow to say the least.
I have been called nuts by family who believe the story they were told. I wish people would wake up.
God bless you 🙏🏻
yup
This entire decade is to separate out those who will place blood on the lintel and those and who will not.
I think it was a nuke (fission) below the basements. I have pictures of melted bed rock that was under the buildings. Jet fuel doesn’t do that. Here’s the links: https://files.catbox.moe/vcpko1.jpeg https://files.catbox.moe/m3jnk6.jpeg
Upload it on catbox.moe then paste the link in the comments.
Thanks
I trust everyone who was involved in the murder of 3000 people will be held accountable even though its over 20 years ago!
The video won't play for me; any suggestions?
Download it then try using VLC?
That worked. Thank you! (but I wasn't impressed because it is the same video(s) and comments that have been around for 20+ years)