Huge 7.5-7.8 Richter scale earthquake in SE Turkey and NW Syria, and someone posted this, yesterday?
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (91)
sorted by:
This is who I listen to on YouTube, regarding earthquakes and many other conspiracy theory topics regarding the earth. No, not flat earth stuff, just regarding fracking, energy, weapons, etc..
This guy is wide awake! https://youtube.com/@dutchsinse
Seconding the recommendation for dutchsinse. He's great at both predicting earthquakes and explaining his reasoning.
"The government and scientists hate this guy, learn why with this simple trick!"
Yes, he is very thorough. Especially when predicting where earthquakes are going to be next. And it’s not because he is psychic, it’s because he actually uses real science. And how the tectonic plates move. He’s very informative, his voice sounds nice, and he’s very clear and concise.
Thank you for specifying it's not a flat earther.
It's frustrating listening to them as an engineer. They make all kinds of claims about math that, if you check their math, they just guessed based on what they wanted and never picked up a calculator.
David Weiss is one of the worst. I checked his math and he was off by 90 orders of magnitude.
The margin he was wrong by was over 10^45 times larger than the difference in strength between gravity and magnetism.
I don't know how much more of an ignorant ass it's possible to be.
I don't understand how he can just sit there and insist "It's mathematically impossible!" When it's painfully obvious from any one who checks his work that he's mathematically illiterate.
Rant over. I'm mad at these people, they hurt our cause.
That’s interesting that you found out that information. And yes, I’m sorry I just don’t believe in the whole flat earth thing. The entire solar system, could not exist with the flat earth. It does it take the daughter of a rocket scientist to know that. Lol.
They don‘t believe that, re space. They see the Earth as an enclosed place. A bit like a large Truman Show. What we see as space is more like in the firmament.
I don‘t know much but the thing that really bugs me is how we often can see way further than we should, all over the place.
Username checks out!
Can you give an example of us being able to see further than we should?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lLmW5Y8BFw
Yeah, just pretend the rest of my comment is unwritten. Focus on the specific part that has nothing to do with anything.
I gave you a specific.
Want to know more details?
David Weiss said that stars would not be visible at astronomical distances because the light would not be strong enough to reach Earth.
This is an easy one to check on.
Just look at the luminosity of a candle and the distance a human can see it. Then you can use that plus the luminosity of the sun to determine how far it would be visible from.
I did that.
It will be of sufficient luminosity to activate a human eye with a direct line of sight from over 10^90 light years away.
David said 5 light years was too much and it would be invisible.
He said it was mathematical fact.
I'm an instrumentation and controls engineer. You can't tell me this lie, I engineer useful equipment that uses the theory he is wrong about.
I'm sorry.
Isn't it frustrating when random people on the internet think they know more about the field you've studied and worked in for years? Oops sorry that comment was meant for the climate scientist.. 😜
Come on you've gotta see the parallels lol
No. I engineer useful equipement that proves itself in industry.
I don't get the option to be wrong. I'm unemployable if I'm wrong because the science I rely on makes real products that are used by real people on an industrial scale.
The environmentalists make incorrect predictions and retroactively modifiy past observations to make it look like they were right all along.
It's not the same. Look at the rotoscopes that are always brought up by people like Tony Heller.
Like you can open an engineering textbook on how to design devices that demonstrably work and prove to them that they are wrong and they will still argue with you.
Leave it to an engineer to back up their point in excruciating detail!
I've seen Heller's name here and there and will check out what he has to say. But calling them out on predictions that didn't pan out is like calling the weather channel to blame their meteorologists for unexpected rain imo. Way too many variables, but the sensationalists seem to have hogged the spotlight in any case.
You may be an engineer. That doesn't make you right on this subject. Your engineering works on both realities.
Here's the problem with that: The physics don't change just because a different scientists is looking in a different direction.
You can't be lazy and pretend that most of the effects don't matter just because you like how one specific action supports your idea. I will be specific:
Lets use CO2 specifically as an example:
The worry, official story and explanation is that shortwave IR from the sun heats up the ground. The ground then backradiates longwave IR (because it's a lower temperature than the sun) and a few bands in the IR spectrum that CO2 interacts strongly with. So, instead of flying relatively unimpeded through the atmosphere, some of the backradiated IR gets absorbed and results in heating in the atmosphere.
That is all accurate and true. In order to prove the theory, a major proof can be done by filling a jar with a ballon overtop with CO2 and then shining an infrared light through the jar. You will accurately demonstrate that the gas will expand with heating and you will demonstrate that you can heat the gas with infrared, something that doesn't happen with all atmospheric gasses.
Environmentalists stop thinking at this point and run to the papers screaming about global warming because theres a correlation between CO2 rise and global temperature rise from ~1960 to ~2005. Not only have they stopped thinking, they've confused the professor because there's still another 45 minutes left to class time, the bells only just rung and we just got started.
Now what are the ways that CO2 could increase in temperature:
What are the ways it could lose heat or otherwise reach equilibrium with it's environment:
The bolded part is the key. CO2 actually makes for a phenomenal cooling gas because it readily looses heat energy in the form of infrared.
To run the balloon-jar experiment to prove it, all you have to do is use a clear balloon and heat the CO2 jar and the control jar with a regular heater. The CO2 jar will deflate faster because it loses the infrared.
Now think about clouds: Everyone knows that a cloudy night is a warmer night than a cloudless night. Why? Because the clouds trap the infrared because water vapor interacts strongly with almost the entire infrared spectrum. Water vapor actually functions as a thermal insulator and greenhouse gas because it becomes so thick in the atmosphere that it actually makes the atmosphere opaque. The effects of water vapor on climate from a greenhouse gas standpoint is what an increadibly strong greenhouse gas looks like.
But that's not even the worst of it. Look at the charts from NASA: every planet in the solar system is getting hotter and I'm not being and ass, here's an MIT article about pluto getting hotter https://news.mit.edu/2002/pluto
The temperature of the planets, wether we like it or not, is based on atmospheric pressure, orbital distance and solar activity.
Those are your drivers of climate.
If you want to know why clmate changes? it's because we have a semi-stable orbit around an unstable nuclear catastrophe that regularly blows off chunks of ionised plasma and sometimes hits us directly with them. It waxes and wanes and our own orbit gets stretched and pulled and made more or less concentric at times.
Sometimes a direct hit CME strips away a bunch of atmosphere and decreases global pressure, causing global cooling.
Sometimes it gets more active for a period of time and it gets hotter like what we see in tree rings.
Sometimes you get what happened in the little ice age and the sun is so quiet that there's no sunspots for years on end and the planet freezes.
The idea that the sun is a stable source of heat for a planet on a constantly varying orbit is rediculous.
IDK what they said to you but I totally agree with you on this. If you or I can easily see the flaw in their logic they hurt our cause
You think your eyes can see 90 light years away, huh? Aw. Bless your heart. How many times have you watched Star Trek?
No, because I calculated the distance based on how far the light would travel through atmosphere at sea level.
Space has no atmosphere to refract, diffuse and absorb light.
The luminosity would be enough for much further in actuality.
I was being generous by including the atmosphere in my calculation and he was still off by 10^90.
That's not a little number to be off by.
He stated that due to the distance to and from stars as presented by the standard model that a star would not be bright enough to reach earth.
He insisted that it was a mathematical fact that the nearest star would not be visible at the distances that astronomers suggest.
So a human eye can see a candle from 1.6 miles away and a candle gives off ~12 lumens of light.
Luminosity is measured from 2 feet away and a mile is 5280 feet. 1.6 miles is 8448 feet. So a human can see a canle in the night from 8448 feet away through atmosphere at see level. At that distance the luminosity from the candle is 13^(1/log2(8448)) - 1 = 0.21 lumens
now the sun is 35,730,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 lumens according to astronomical estimations based on the amount of light hitting earth. So how far would the sun have to be in order to be an equvalent brightness to a candle, through atmosphere at sea level?
Let's do math, we can reverse the formula with the approprate variables 35,730,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,001^(1/log2(x))-1 = 0.021 x = 6.707 x 10^103 feet That's 1.27 x 10 ^ 100 miles
the speed of light is 1.86 x 10^5 miles per second (1 light second) or 5.88 x 10^9 miles per year (1 light year)
1.27 X 10^100 / 5.88 x 10^9 = 2.16 x 10^90
That means that the sun will be apparantly brighter than a candle out to a distance of 2.16 x 10^90 light years.
Modern cosmology says the nearest star is only 5 light years away Modern cosmology says the nearest galaxy is only 2.5 X 10^5 light years away Modern cosmology says the amount of universe we can see with our telescopes so far only reaches out to 4.86 X 10^10 light years.
The sun will be appear to be brighter than a candle for a distance greater than the total distance light could have travelled since it's birth.
The sun will be brighter than a candle for so long that 10 new stars will live and die using material from the sun before that light thins enough to be outdone by a candle.
David doesn't do math.
He insists and that's about it.
Well, that’s a lot to unpack. I appreciate your passion to your science. Can I ask you, how many hours of actual flat earth research have you done? I’m just curious because you seem well researched In the Rockefeller system.
I've researched it enough to actually have a favorite version of the theory 😝
My favorite version is the one with the ice wall, lands beyond the ice, and multiple suns and moons in concentric orbits. I find the idea of multiple suns in outer concentric rings, like electron orbitals to be fun.
I've thought about doing a Flat Earth DnD campain.
I also think that rim world is a nice bit of science fiction and mental exploration in alternative physics and crafted worlds.
Doesn't mean I believe it though.
Every time you use a GPS, you rely on the understanding of the workings of the universe that also demonstrates that the earth is a spheroid. Flat Earth stuff is a literal psyop.
Maybe you are underestimating the capabilities of the towers and perhaps putting a little too much faith in the satellites. What makes you believe that there are hunks of metal spinning around the earth? Who or what convinced you of this theory?
I literally built a telescope and looked, I went sailing, I went up in a single-prop plane with my dad and looked. I also studied physics to the point where I could see how it formed a coherent, but incomplete whole, into which the modern astrophysical model fits without any strange or unlikely assumptions.
As to how flat-earth psyops benefit the people engaging in them, and the people funding them: the people promulgating them make nice salaries off of their followers, as well as getting problems taken care of by their handlers. The people funding them get to use obviously inane discussions to discredit "conspiracy theorists" (a term made up by the CIA to describe people who accurately saw that JFK was assassinated by the CIA).
You’ll get there eventually. Just look into it.
That's what I was going to tell you as advice for your sailing journey to the edge of the world.
Also, why the Flat Earth psyop? Are they just trying to make random people look crazy? What benefits does the ostracized flat earther gain? Now, imagine if the globe was the actual psyop...it's quite easy to see the possible gains for the government and NASA. 60 million a day sounds pretty nice. Hiding resources seems beneficial to the elites. Hiding extra land would keep the people imprisoned and controlled. Hiding the existence of a creator would definitely strengthen Satan's vice grip of the minds of earthlings.
None of us KNOW anything, we just have beliefs with varying degrees of certainty. It's the certainties that cause all our grief and conflict.
P.S. I've been researching flat earth for a while now, despite my serious doubts. I'm still not convinced by either theory, although flat earth is pretty intriguing once you go deep enough.
Some choose to believe the greatest lie ever told because they are conditioned to behave like self-indulgent assholes when confronted with alternative theories of our reality. It's part of the programming.
If one were to spout off about living in a computer simulation people here might be inclined to go "Hmm, anything is possible." But something about flat earth triggers folks.
Hmmm, anything IS possible.
All flat earthers have the same MO.
They all argue from a position of hostility and ad hominem. They're all completely oblivious to how ridiculous their argument sounds to what they consider "normies".
They all do the "trust the science" schtick of maskers while simultaneously ignoring all science.
And they all have no desire to follow forum rules. Their bullshit belongs on conspiracies.win, yet surprise surprise you can't find their posts there. Because their only purpose is to conflate their batshit crazy ideas with Q to contaminate Q by association and they can't pull that off by posting on conspiracies.win.
"All"? Are you certain?
I honestly believe that there is a ton of information out there and TGA.win is the perfect place to debate ideas that people are learning out there. No one who does even a cursory dive into flat earth comes away thinking that is bullshit. If we all come at all ideas with free and open minds then we can uncover everything our controls hide from us. They are killing us…how far is it to reach that they lied about the very world we walk on?
Like I said, completely oblivious.
All the same arguments, complete bullshit. You can't even get past first base of establishing why, if the earth was flat, why elites would care anyone knows about it as there is nothing to be gained by it.
For all we know, Antarctica has a massive colony of human trafficked individuals and their offspring, which are bred and used for human sacrifice to Satan, adrenochrome and sex slaves. One method elites use to hide this is wrapping Antarctica in mystique and deflection with "flat earth", driving conspiracy theories about the world being flat as a reason no one can go there, as opposed to the much worse reason of human trafficking.
You can't explain why elites wouldn't want the population knowing about the earth being flat, but it should be plainly obvious why they don't want people knowing about their trafficking.
Anyways, I've been far too generous chatting with a DARPA AI bot.
They are hiding the existence of God. That’s it. That’s the big take away. Flat earth proves a creator. Now back to sleep with you.
If you could prove God's existence, faith would be unnecessary.
Ergo, every word you just typed is the antithesis of what the Bible says about God.
You've traded faith in God for faith in flat earth.
Flat earth theories seem to be nothing more than "Bro-science." Buuuuut brooooo
Sounds like you've done the deep dive on this subject. What have you learned about it? Or is it all stupid and not worth your time?
I wouldn't say its stupid, or not time worthy. Just pretty far out of reach to prove one way or another. Off topic on this board too. And Its usually responses like these that get a rise out of this community. They all sound the same, yours included.
I get uppity when people try to proclaim they know more than anyone else. I think there are secret human powers that have been cloaked from us. Self-actualization, self-healing, mind-reading, clairvoyance…does that make me an idiot or stupid because I’ve researched these topics and you have not? I think everyone needs to chill out on attacking people with different beliefs.
that account and those posts are nuts, what does he study? Gravity from other planets? Thats wild
IDK, could have to do with how the earth's core is doing (and maybe he tells by mag fields) but he knows his stuff. I wonder, maybe the earthquake is by natural causes but it was directed to Turkey by the Deep State?
Interesting. A related guy is using a "planetary geometry matrix" as a predictive tool for earthquakes. And he was also correct in his observations, it appears.
https://twitter.com/ssgeos - "research institute for monitoring geometry between celestial bodies related to seismic activity"
Is it HAARP or is it Prophesy???
Only your Mind can tell....
""The Commercials from the 80s"" have joined the chat....
Could be both.
Bible predicts pestilence killing like 1/4 of the Earth's people at the end. He never said it was natural. In fact, it makes sense that MAN is the engineer of all of the end-time woes. Revelation just predicts what will happen, not necessarily how.
Just when you think you're safe in your own little world, God steps in and shakes things up. Keep an eye on Turkey. I expect they're going to be doing some wild stuff in the near future. And this earthquake just confirms it for me.
Maybe something hidden in that region will be uncovered. Sign from God to pay close attention.
About 60% of the geography mentioned in the Bible is located in Turkey. There is a lot hidden there that most people don't realize. Many prayers for those people to come away from idolatry and back to the faith that has been there since the beginning.
We should watch the Euphrates....
Interesting..... Go on....
Fire needs oxygen to burn. What is the sun?
The sun is not fire.
You've been?
Why do you think we need to physically travel to the Sun to verify its properties?
Measuring the sun’s output across each wavelength of light lets us work out it’s average surface temperature, and this gives a figure that is approximately 5,000 C. Any matter at this temperature is a plasma. While fire can sometimes be classified as a plasma, fire is also a specific type of oxidation reaction, which doesn’t occur on the Sun due to its relatively low concentration of oxygen. The Sun’s spectral properties show that it’s composed primarily of hydrogen, thus its energy output is driven entirely by nuclear fusion.
Uh huh
You must enjoy being spanked.
You must enjoy Star Trek.
So... you believe in chemistry but not nuclear physics?
hurray for SCIENCE!!!
So this is good timing and all, but he just put a dot at a spot 3 tectonic plates meet, that has had serveral similar sized eaethquakes in the past.
Yes. Not too hard to guess.
Careful guys. All someone has to do is make a whole bunch of posts “predicting” earthquakes all over the globe, then when one happens you just quickly delete all the irrelevant posts.
People do this with sports predictions all the time. For example predicting every underdog as the Superbowl winner in case one of them does win.
Crazy
WOW, he MUST be psychic!! "Sooner or later" there will be an earthquake in the most earthquake prone country on the planet. Amazing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
There was another more recent 7.5 earthquake this time in Central Turkey.
Looking at the top map posted, anyone can see that an earthquake in this region is inevitable, even if you didn't know about all the historical ones. See that dark line under the red squiggle? It's a fault line over the junction of two tectonic plates, which are at right angles to another fault just under the red squiggle. Here's a simplified map of the situation: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Map-showing-simplified-tectonic-setting-of-the-Arabian-plate-and-nearby-tectonic-features_fig1_324476527
Sure, but if you go look at https://ssgeos.org/ and their predicition videos, they're suggesting that it's because of a planetary alignment that is causing some sort of EM disturbance resulting in an earthquake. I think they would agree with you this area is ripe for the earthquake, but the timing they had was not coincidental