Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

246
2018 article by Fiona Barnett: Watergate was Pedogate - “The Watergate break-in was strictly based on one thing – the pedophile records that were being kept at the Democratic National Headquarters.” – Det. James Rothstein, NYPD, Retired (themillenniumreport.com) 🧠 MEMORY HOLE 🕳️
posted 3 years ago by Excelsior 3 years ago by Excelsior +246 / -0
39 comments share
39 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (39)
sorted by:
▲ 39 ▼
– Choctaw 39 points 3 years ago +39 / -0

Been saying this for a long time, it's the reason I believe Hillary was fired from the prosecution team, she stole a copy of the material and that's why she has such a grip on people in DC and such power over others.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– SneakyWino 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

You know what's up. Amazing more don't!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– merf 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Help a friend jog his memory. Wasn't there a Q post discussing her being fired?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– inspoken 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

No Q posts with a Fiona or with Barnett. You might be thinking of Fiona Hill a black hat with a British accent

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 33 ▼
– bubble_bursts 33 points 3 years ago +33 / -0

Not hard to believe at all. I have always said that. whatever it was, to go and steal it from DNC, they must be something extremely sensitive. And we are not talking about election strategy crap. In the past I used to think must be some kind of national secrets. But this makes perfect sense.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Notimportant81 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

Actually the reason posited at the time was they were searching for proof that McGovern was working with the Cubans, which was believable at the time.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– changeagent 21 points 3 years ago +21 / -0

Tragically, I hope this is true!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– BetterNameUnfound 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

I understand what you mean.

We don't WANT it to be true, because if it is, that means children have had unspeakable things done to them.

Just like how we don't WANT 9/11 to be an inside job, because that raises so, so many more questions about our government than "it was an actual terrorist attack" would.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– changeagent 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Exactly. Thank you

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– Narg 21 points 3 years ago +21 / -0

Whoa! I'd never heard that before.

But not hard to believe.

The focus on everything in this war comes down to Good Versus Evil -- every time. All else is just detail.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– swimkin 19 points 3 years ago +19 / -0

Oh this is the first time I’ve ever hear this. But it now makes a lot of sense. I always thought watergate was overblown for what they said happened.

It truly does explain all of Nixon’s subsequent actions.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– orangetastic1 19 points 3 years ago +19 / -0

Would also explain why the Republican party has been such cucks in the last half century. Dems have the ability to compromise enough of them to neuter the rest.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Ddrake517 14 points 3 years ago +14 / -0

My reaction is how they describe in the article. I was a young teen when Watergate went down. It just made no sense and I figured that I didn't pay close enough attention. Now l'm retired. In Apr of 2020 went the lockdown were imposed, I decided to pay better attention. I'm so glad I did.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– FractalizingIron 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

I've known of Barnett for quite a few years now. Sadly, I've found her a bit hard to take serious. A lot of her stuff feels to me like a mixture of fact and fiction, experience merged with MK Ultra'd distortions.

One point being her trafficked to Nixon, which I find very hard to believe.

I'm not saying there isn't truth in barnett's testimonies. I'm just saying wounded minds come up with all sorts of distortions.

Interestingly enough, SOTN editors seem to have a similar opinion.

The full version does draw one conclusion, however, about President Nixon that SOTN completely disagrees with. It’s more likely that Nixon would use highly classified Pedogate info to gain political advantage; and quite unlikely that he was involved in any way with pedophilia…although anything is possible.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– winn 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

this

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– BerlinWallCrosser 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

This was communicated to me when I worked in MI back in the late 70s. Nixon wanted to permanently take down the D party with child sex crimes and trafficking but the CIA stabbed him in the back and used the Dems and the MSM to get Nixon & Agnew out and install Ford before installing Carter.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– GopherEverett 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

"At least they let Nixon live" - JFK

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– TomPaineSentMe 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

This doesn't make any sense at all

"In 1972, Rothstein arrested one of the five Watergate burglars, CIA operative Frank Sturgis. "

UM, no.

Why would a NYPD police detective be in involved in arrested a group of burglars in Washington, DC?

And "one of the five?" All five burglars were arrested at the Watergate office building. Together. The same night. And we know the cops who did it. The DC cops obviously.

And we know, none of the burglars confessed during interrogation. The plan was they were to plead guilty and shut up. And they did.

This does not add up.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– TomPaineSentMe 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

looking into this I'm not convinced Detective Rothstein ever made such a claim.

This claim seems only seems to come from Fiona Barnett of Australia and is not first hand.

This is why nobody ever heard of this before.

I know for a fact Rothstein did not arrest Frank Sturgis in 1972.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– TNBanjoMan 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

Wow!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– Scorpion76 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

I guess it brings a different meaning to "bigger than Watergate"? As in its not what the narrative said it was about. Just saying.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Anosha 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Yeah this gives additional overtones to many things in the drops.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– inspoken 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

You can bet Nixon knew & that he told Trump everything when they were alone for that 3 hour conversation that no one knows what they talked about. This is probably how Trump knew what to be most aware of & avoided all the traps

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– merf 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Any sauce that we can read up on this conversation?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– inspoken 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

I don't keep a file but by searching I found this: https://nypost.com/2020/09/24/trump-nixon-letters-reveal-previously-unknown-relationship/

and this https://archive.is/zD1gd I think it was after that party that Trump offered Nixon a ride home & flew the former president back to Cali. IDK where I read that

Nobody knows anything about that conversation (or at least no one is saying they did) but they talked at length

We also know from Roger Stone that Nixon was the 1st person to suggest that Trump could be president.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– eagledriver 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

A VERY GREAT FIND and well worth the read...CIA AND FIBS working together...then BOTH of those orgs needs to be DEEP SIXED and NOTHING remaining OF EACH...

Also, ALL FILES OF EVERYONE needs to be investigated and EVERY FACET of their lives taken apart...

Gitmo will be too nice for these people...

NOTE: US Army are the ONLY ones who can be on the FIRING SQUAD!!!!!!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Revodude 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

The democrats were running sex for campaign cash out of their Watergate offices. I hadn't heard that it was underage, but that would not surprise me one bit.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Muncie1112 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Did you notice they are trying to back up their story with a new mini series? https://m.imdb.com/title/tt11468254/

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– CQVFEFE 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

TIL there are pedophile records

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Tailgunner49 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

I remember a clip of Nixon on bohemian grove ‘there’s a lot a gay sh!t going n there’

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TheGreatPurge 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

It’s more likely that Nixon would use highly classified Pedogate info to gain political advantage; and quite unlikely that he was involved in any way with pedophilia…

article:, Nixon might have been a pedo or he might have allowed political-pedophilia to continue to gain political power.

or... he could have exposed the corruption all together. which (IMO) seems more likely since they impeached him. no second chance to expose them.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DesertBrat 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

He was facing impeachment. He resigned beforehand.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TheGreatPumpkin 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Holy sheet batman

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Moose_Antlers 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I have to ask some key questions:

  1. The blog "died suddenly" two years ago. Nothing newer has been posted on the previously very active blog. Explanation?
  2. Who is the blogger?
  3. Who is the actual author, this Fiona chick?
  4. How do we know these people have any credibility at all?
  5. Her story is that she was child trafficked to Nixon and others. She presents no evidence of this. Her assertion about the nature of Watergate is dependent on her assertion of child trafficking. Again, she presents no evidence of any of this.

So, we've got a random name, posting on a dead blog, which made some extremely extraordinary claims and then presented no actual evidence to back any of it up. Seriously, the Loch Ness monster people do better. I'm not saying it's not possible, but I have no reason whatsoever to believe it based on what's presented here.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Excelsior [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

FWIW https://archive.org/details/eyeswideopen-2020-edition/mode/2up

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– truthloveliberty 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Credibility with who? Why was Franklin gloating over his voodoo cock-n-balls treat?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– boataholic 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

She sounds like a grifter who is muddying the water on the real pedogate.

permalink save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy