My investigation suggests the story we have been told about America's founding, the Constitution, the Founding Fathers, etc., is complete hogwash. Our "history" is a fabrication of "good" and "freedom" given to justify something so insidious, it's almost impossible to believe. This isn't, nor has it ever been, "the land of the free," it is the "land of the completely brainwashed."
Digging into Franklin is a great example of this. His background story is total bullshit. So much necessary context is left out of the official version, and we think of the facts stated in terms of the context of today, or along the lines of the rhetoric presented. This method of story telling paints a false picture.
For example, Franklin is presented as coming from humble beginnings. Nothing could be further from the truth. His father owned a big candle making business. History paints it as a "lowly" profession (candle making) but the context left out is that Franklin's father wasn't just a "candle maker" he was the owner of a large profitable business. He had many employees. He was also a local magistrate. Not for the legal structure of the town, but for the Church. The context left out is that the Church WAS the legal structure of the town in the 17th and 18th centuries in New England.
Ben is said to have "not gone to school," and been "self taught." Bullshit. According to the narrative he went to Boston Latin School for a year and had a private tutor for a year. He then went into a printing apprenticeship. The context that is left out of his "self-taught" education is that the school he went to, Boston Latin School, was a school for the Elite. No one but the top of society could go there, and no one but the top of society could afford a private tutor. He likely did take over his own education, but that was almost certainly because he was smart as fuck and he had access to all the books he needed to teach himself, not because the opportunities didn't exist for him to go to school. Indeed, his father had wanted him to become a Minister, like his grandfather. The context left out of that is that a Minister meant going to college. ALL MINISTERS of that time period were from the top of society. Less than 1% of people went to college, and only those born to the "right" families. That opportunity was there for him, even though he didn't take it. That is not an opportunity afforded to anyone but the top of society.
A printing apprenticeship was one of the hardest guilds to get in to. Not only did you already have to know Latin going in (thus restricted to only those with enough education at a young age), but "printers" weren't just people who printed whatever anyone wanted, they were the News Media of the day. They chose what to print, what people saw, what propaganda was shown. They were The News. The printers trade was only afforded to select people, but both Benjamin Franklin and his brother James were printers (he was apprenticed to his brother James).
Franklin was born high, his parents were born high, his grand parents were born high, etc. We look at these things in the context of today, where everyone gets an education (Rockefeller's brainwashing institution), or where being a Minister is not an Elite profession, or without understanding exactly what a printing apprenticeship is. Once you start digging in, and you start comparing the life of these "humble beginnings" people to the opportunities afforded to the other 99% of the population at the time, you see that it's all complete bullshit. Everyone in our history is a member of the One Percent. EVERYONE. They are all members of the Aristocracy, from birth. no matter how low they are placed in "official history."
This little dive into Franklin doesn't even touch on the fact that recent digging in his house found the bodies of children in the cellar, or numerous other little tidbits that shouldn't exist for an "American Hero." I do not think Benjamin Franklin was a very good guy at all, but the Narrative needs heroes, and Ben got to become one of them. I think he was a hero; a hero of the Cabal.
Ben’s aunt… was prominent in the Salem trials, being a primary accuser of Rebecca Nurse, Martha Corey and John Proctor, all of whom were allegedly hanged. So that's what Ben's family was involved in at the time. They don't teach you that in history class, do they?
Great post. Now do the Confederacy. They were the “good guys” but we were taught in school that they were only fighting to keep their slaves; even though only a small fraction of society actually owned slaves. We were never taught the truth about the real Dishonest Abe or his crushing tariffs on the Southern states.
I agree with this. And the next level of understanding from that is exploring why the Russian Tsar sent his navy to the US coast and told European countries that an attack on the Union would be war against Russia. Was it bankers using the Confederacy in the same way they run color revolutions now, to disrupt the status quo so they can move in and take even more power?
I’m not denigrating the Confederacy nor glorifying the Union by saying this, any more than I think Black Lives don’t Matter, understand. I’m saying it’s elites cynically (creating and) using social turmoil to their ends.
The Confederacy was not the good guys. They were just the other bad guys, the controlled opposition. Yes, they were fighting for State Rights. Yes, it wasn't primarily about slavery, and Abe was almost certainly a willing agent of the Cabal. But the Confederacy was also funded by family Rothschild, doing exactly what they were supposed to do, controlled in exactly the same way as the Yanks.
You may very well be right. It’s a shame we are not taught that the South was pushed too far just like Americans as a whole today are being pushed to their limit. Hell, it’s global to be honest. Regardless of the goings on behind the scenes, the South was invaded. They didn’t want war and the average Northern soldier didn’t either. The people didn’t have bad intentions. The politicians screwed them then just like they do now. Propaganda had to have been super easy back then.
In my opinion, the grievances Americans hold today outweigh the causes of secession from first the British Crown and then the South from the North. The trespasses on us are very similar but worse in many cases. We even have quartering today. Illegal aliens instead of soldiers.
To your point, I would not doubt one bit that Judah Benjamin was a Rothschild puppet. He turned tail and fled for England when the job was done.
My research suggests there has not been a single war, anywhere in the world, for at least three centuries that was not run, both sides, by the Cabal.
Propaganda had to have been super easy back then.
It was. It is even easier now. They only got better as time went on, with more avenues to exploit.
They didn’t want war and the average Northern soldier didn’t either.
The peoplenever want war. Why would anyone care about what other people are doing a thousand miles away from their home, or ten thousand? The answer is, they don't. The people have to worry about feeding their family, or fixing the barn, etc. If it doesn't have any impact on their life, people don't care very much, no matter what is going on. So how do people become motivated to travel thousands of miles to go murder other people in their homes? The PTB, through propaganda, create a belief in a future impact. If you believe you are under imminent threat, you will go murder other people in their homes. If you further believe your cause is holy or righteous then you will be very motivated to go kill people in their homes.
Of course not everyone will be sufficiently motivated by that propaganda, that's what conscription is for, but creating the belief in a righteous cause and/or imminent danger is an essential first step that helps even the conscripted to swallow the pill. Those efforts of belief creation are always done by the Cabal first, and it is always a lie, based on a partial truth. For the North, it was the belief in abolishing slavery. For the South, it was the belief in defending States Rights. Both were true, albeit not necessarily as true as the people were led to believe.
When you look at any war you can find such propaganda for belief creation (usually on both sides) going back forever. When you look at who is creating those beliefs, it always leads back to the same group of people for every war in at least the past three centuries, with many wars having clear leads to the same group going much further back than that (Crusades e.g.). As it turns out, the people who create the propaganda also happen to be the same people that fund the wars, on both sides.
This is one of those threads that makes those unaware hate their own country
Don't buy it. It's a gig the media and academia have long pursued. Honestly: do you believe this country is evil, formed from evil and evil to the core?
The Cabal element is. But our fellow countrymen? No. Sleeping is not the same as Satanic.
They are not US.
If you attended a church, and there were hundreds of wonderful Christians, a solid fellowship, and the guy standing up front turned out to be a fraud and a creep, would you say "Christianity is bad"?
If the founding fathers and those who supported them were less than extraordinary, the USA would today be in the same conditions as the United States of Mexico (yes, that's the country's official name), or the various countries liberated by Simón Bolívar, tilting from right-wing strongman to left-wing socialist junta. Our country is exceptional, and was guided by freedom-loving visionaries, regardless of their human flaws.
Just like everything else, establishment of America was a controlled operation, and just like every other time, their controlled operation ultimately got out of their hand and instead ended up becoming the first Constitutional Republic that was outside the clutches of Cabal for almost a 100 years.
that was outside the clutches of Cabal for almost a 100 years
False. The control was, at a couple select times, more subtle, but it was still there. However, for most of the time in that first 100 years it was controlled just as it is today, through wars, and debts from those wars. All the Presidents with one possible exception (Jackson) had ties to the Cabal and links to the Banksters. Importantly, they were all Aristocrats and Secret Society members. Even Jackson was an Aristocrat, I think he was just working for a different faction, thus his actions were against the Bankers, but not against the Secret Societies that ruled the world from behind the scenes. I'm not saying that's not a better thing, but it's still not "the land of the free," its "the land of the controlled by Secret Societies from behind the scenes."
The Land of the Free has always been an illusion. The Constitutional Republic was the opposite of what it pretended to be (freedom of We The People). It was set up to Rule us, claiming Sovereignty over our Jurisdiction. Any attempt to paint it as a "good thing" completely misses the reality of what it was, and what it did. It created The Illusion of freedom, while explicitly stating otherwise.
At this point it looks like the constitution is the only thing between us owning guns and having free speech. Yes, the politicians go against it but we can apply to our judicial branch for relief. Obviously, even the judicial system is corrupt but so far they have not been able take our guns. Illusion of freedom or not other countries are looking to us to fight this good fight. Are they wrong to look to us? Are we wrong to take this structure, this nation and want to fight for it? No. A resounding No.
Are we wrong to take this structure, this nation and want to fight for it? No. A resounding No.
I would suggest it is more like a "Yes, and also a resounding No."
The idea that the Constitution can in any way give you, or even protect your Rights is the fraud. A Constitution can't say anything about your Rights at all, they are your Rights, they are inalienable, they can't be taken away. The fact that we have Laws that attempt to take them away is the fraud. The Constitution plays cover for those Laws, justifying an entirely fraudulent legal system in it's pretense.
In addition, the Constitution itself takes away our Rights. Just look at the fifth amendment. It is full of denial of our inalienable Rights. It lays claim to OUR JURISDICTION, while at the same time proclaiming the opposite. Since these Rights violations are built in to the Constitution itself, that also perpetuates the fraud, because the only way to "get back our Rights" (which is impossible, because they can't be taken away in the first place) is by further Constitutional Amendment, or complete Revolution.
We thus live in a fraudulent system, designed to justify a fraudulent view of what law is, pretending to be about "protecting Rights", when in fact it is all about taking them away slowly but surely, until none exist.
You think we still have freedom of speech? Wrong, we don't. There are numerous "illegal acts of speech," not the least of which is talking about actual Revolution (i.e. planning a real revolution) against the Tyranny of our government and its Constitution. You think we still have freedom to bear arms? Wrong, we don't. There are numerous systems in place to reduce gun ownership (over taxation, price fixing, difficult licensing, impossible licensing in some states for many people, etc.). It should be that everyone has a gun, and is trained to use it. Instead it's more like 10% of the population has one (at least one), and much less than that know how to use it properly. If it came to actual war against the US Govt. (The purpose of 2A) we wouldn't stand a chance. The weapons we can buy are trivial next to what the Govt. has at their disposal. A real civil war of We The People v. the U. S. Govt. would be trivially won by the Govt. in a New York minute. Our access to weapons is just too limited.
We live in the illusion of "protected rights." It's all a farce, an act, a play. That is why the Military is truly the only way. What we are doing now is continuing the play so that the people will think that they have taken back their government, but in reality, the Military had to have stepped in and taken care of everything already.
If they did, it wouldnt have taken then 150 years to get their much coveted world wars to exterminate the pesky monarchies there were always standing in their way, and 250 years to get the world to the edge of the precipice.
Looking at the cabal's actions over history, it appears to me that their belief system involving bloodlines and preservation of them over generations has allowed them to attack problems (for their preferred ultimate outcome) over longer timelines than typical human lifespan ( or alternatively said multi generational and incremental solutions toward the ultimate goal). Since generally populations do not think generationally and do not focus much on bloodlines, the population is unable to consider or fathom the slow incremental attacks on the population by the current and next generations of cabal members. So risk tends to go to 0% and success over time goes to 100%.
The reality is boiling a frog (population) fast has a high likelihood of meeting direct resistance and failure. Boiling the same frog ( population) slowly over multiple incremental and generational steps toward the ultimate goal has a high likelihood of going unnoticed and succeeding without any noteworthy resistance. ---Makes me think of why operation warp speed was a success for Trump as it accelerated the boiling events far too quickly and guaranteed substantial resistance would occur --
One might even argue that Andrew Jackson was responsible for preventing the first (more rapid) attempt to get the population to quickly proceed to where the cabal desired it be in a shorter timespan. Thus the failure there required they regroup and begin attacking again from a different point on a multi generational timescale.
So did the constitution give the cabal what they ultimately wanted for America? No, it provided a framework with baked in weaknesses that could be exploited to erode the population's liberties and thus generate multiple paths to that end. The things the cabal didn't get immediately were not achieved because they were not possible to do or accomplish on the generation that composed the population at that time.
I believe the better question is did the cabal get what they wanted for that generation in the constitution? To this I believe the answer is yes because the framework (Constitution) allowed sufficient cover for them to operate and erode the freedoms and liberties understood by the people without having to be completely exposed in the process. Also, the constitution was substantially better for the cabal's ultimate goals than the preceding Articles of Confederation since it created a federal government with actual power which centralized the points of control that should be attacked to pave the way for their incremental multi generational plans.
Since the cabal generally understands what kind of measured multi-generational approach is necessary within a given generation to continue movement and inertia toward their ultimate goal, I would argue from that perspective the cabal did get what was realistically achievable.
Really I see the cabal as being backed by spiritual satanic forces (demons, principalities, Satan) whom do not age or die like humans and whom intend to battle Creator God for control of all domains (physical and spiritual (or perhaps alternatively described as higher multidimensional)). Given that the human bloodlines and families are serving and following these evil forces, the generational continuity of the cabal has been preserved far more consistently and more successfully than the typical non cabal affiliated family. I have often noticed that there is inevitably (typically at generation #3 or #4 if the original successful generation did not neglect their own children) a generation of idiots whom squander the previous successful generation's progress in moving their family up in society. This results in a reset for the family back to a typically average state compared to the general population.
This is probably the best analysis I have seen about the subject of Constitution, kudos. I do believe this deserves to be its own post on a slow news day (if we indeed have such days in the near future!)
I agree with the observation that Cabal is backed by satanic forces and operate on much longer time scales in multigenerational operations.
I also agree with the boiling of the frogs analogy, however, I would like to borrow that analogy and refine it a bit further to make a point.
Imagine this pot full of water in which frogs live, but the controls to heat and cool the water is inside the pot, accessible only to frogs. Further assume that the controls are very many, and each one increments just a little bit. Naturally, frogs would constantly be moving the controls, but the hot and cold changes usually cancel out.
The only way the Cabal can destroy the frogs is to trick the frogs into making changes to the controls so that overall changes to hot is more than cold.
So if things go smoothly, the frogs gradually keep making the water hotter and hotter, by their own volition, and not even realise it, until they are all cooked.
However, the side effect of this approach is that, there are always a small subset of frogs who are especially observant and who understand what is going in. They cannot stop it, because its a collective problem. Only way to stop it is to make all the frogs understand this design and this problem. An awakening.
Until then, all they can do is impart this information to a few others, no matter how small that number is, and make it part of their collective memory, so that one day it may lead to the awakening.
Infact, I would argue that in this system the only possible solution out of this is the awakening of a majority of the frogs. Everything else is temporary fixes.
So the problem boils down to - is the speed at which the frogs are being boiled slower or faster, then the speed at which the awakening could happen ?
If you agree that this reasonably represents where we find ourselves in this boiling frog analogy, I can make my next point.
So did the constitution give the cabal what they ultimately wanted for America? No, it provided a framework with baked in weaknesses that could be exploited to erode the population's liberties and thus generate multiple paths to that end.
I believe the better question is did the cabal get what they wanted for that generation in the constitution? To this I believe the answer is yes
While I agree with both of these claims, I make the case that this is just one side of the boiling frog equation - the speed of boiling. And the claims simply state that the constitution provided a way for the boiling to proceed.
However, the other side of the equation we should ask is, did the constitution also provide a speed of awakening? And whether this speed of awakening was faster than the speed of boiling?
And to that, the answer would be this:
The Founding of United States and its constitution is one of the very few human conceptions, that ensured that the speed of awakening was always sustained in the right amount to be able to ultimately be faster than the speed of boiling. The founding itself seared the ideas of Liberty into the very soul of the people, and the Constitution provided enough safeguards to ensure every boiling action produced enough friction to also sustain the awakening action.
In other words, without this Constitution we would never had enough white hats, embedded in all aspects of the society, no matter how deeply controlled by the Cabal, to such an extent that this ultimate Q operation was not only possible, but inevitable.
For me, its the exact opposite. Even with control at every point, they still didn't manage to create a vassal state. They still had to slog more than 150 years before they could get their world wars to exterminate European monarchies, and it took them another more than 250 years to get to this point right now.
If Land of the Free was an illusion and it fought back so hard, imagine what we will have after Post Awakening.
In a way I agree. Ultimately, we are free, and that freedom can't be taken away. But we have been taught to believe in fraudulent legal systems and fraudulent systems of government that are designed to create an illusion of freedom while being exactly the opposite. That fraudulent system includes the original United States.
So yes, we are free, and we always have been, because that is a gift from Source, but we also have trained beliefs that cause us to give up our freedom through the illusion. That illusion goes much deeper than most realize, even those who are "awakened."
If Land of the Free was an illusion and it fought back so hard, imagine what we will have after Post Awakening.
This never would have happened without Q, so I suggest it wasn't the "Land of the Free" that fought back, but a few people who sit near the top of the fraudulent system who are teaching us how to fight back after the real war has already been won ("The Military is the only way").
I think OP is dooming. The USA always had a head start and a leg up over every other revolution, because of its founding principles and the relative selflessness of its leaders. If George Washington had been Simon Bolivar, our history would be very different. The founding fathers did an exceptional job and gave us a legacy like no other country.
Understanding reality is not a "black pill," it is a necessary step in Awakening.
We have been trained to ignore evidence. Learning how to look at evidence reveals the Illusion. The Great Awakening is understanding that there is an illusion, and understanding its details. Those details are not "black pills," they are red pills. If you turn it into black because you don't like it, that's on you.
Its a black pill for me.
I always thought of Ben Franklin as amazing founding father. But these revelations. Its a lot like learning that your father is a sith lord.
I'm still having a hard time buying it. But that's what research is for.
I dunno I think some redpills can be blackpills. I mean if you take those idea that everyone has to know the truth about everything then I guess keep sending those blacks - eh, redpills. But look at our country before ww2 it was pretty based and most people only knew that they had to get up tomorrow to go to work and to Churxh on Sunday to praise god and then to go do some baby making and the rest worked itself out. We had a homogenous high trust society that was 95% white and not infiltrated by the eternal enemy and it all was pretty damn good. Now we have the world at our fingertips while the place is overrun. Now there’s a blackpill for you
And the nation itself was made up of Christian patriots for the most part. Creepy stuff at the top? Almost always.
Do you remember, years ago, when that woman stood up at the mic and said God told her to tell the people: this Nation WAS founded for God, by Christians, and we shouldn't believe we were formed from evil.
She was dragged off stage and called crazy, and fired. I think she was a court reporter or something.
That resonated. She was right. Or rather: God was right 😉 I don't get too involved in rabbit holes like this anymore, because it removes focus on who REAL Americans were.
That and who we are as patriots. Whatever reason for our founding, here we are now in this space and time. We have more freedoms, though under attack, than most of the world. We are close to being as free as we've ever experienced in our lifetimes.
I did research long ago on all those guys. Some founding fathers were good men, others were total sick-o's and crazy. Ben Franklin was a sick-o and had a friend he wanted to come over to America from England, his name was Dr. Benjamin Rush.
If you ever wonder where the bodies came from under the house it was from Dr. Benjamin Rush. Ben Franklin was the father of the modern prison as you know it today. He built the large Eastern penitentiary in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The things they did to people was not good and a lot of men went insane in that place. They did crazy psychiatry experiments on a lot of those folks as well as medical experiments too.
The inmates lived in complete isolation. There was total silence in the whole penitentiary and your face was covered a lot. It would make you go insane. When people died they took them and did experiments on dead people also. When they uncovered the bodies they did check and found what was done to some of them.
In case you didn't know Dr. Benjamin Rush also signed the Declaration of independence.
So there is 2 sick-o's
Ben Franklin was a pervert
From what I’ve learned, discerned, America, capitalism, freedom was a mechanism to fund the military industrial complex for global control. For how many times I’ve said Jefferson would roll over in his grave if he knew what’s happening today… they all could have been shills. I look at the symbology of the layout of DC and it becomes obvious…. Unless history was re-written and DC existed before we know. America wasn’t founded by Columbus and may have been the equivalent playground of the satanists, similar to Epstein island, and freedom of religion was to secure that end. That being said, what I believed the founding docs were meant to be is what I hope finally prevails. Trust God, heaven knows if it were up to me I’d flood the whole damn thing, may need a slightly bigger boat.
Alrighty then, well I liked the illusion of the Founding. If we didn’t get it right for the benefit of the people the first time, we shall get it right the second time around and live up to it!
Exactly, we have been slowly advancing into the apocalypse "lifting of the veil" or "disclosure" of very harsh truths but once the veil gets lifted, the emperor has no clothes
DC had one during the 1960s called The Quorum Club. There was a big cover up protecting those who fornicated with commie women back then. Swalwell is an example of how today’s treason was treated back then.
I saw this the other night on Josh Gates "Expedition X" where he has two minions blundering around looking at stuff. I think Josh does a lot of stuff and probably owns the travel channel by now. I like his shows. Lots of fun.
Many mainstream TV shows and movies include Hellfire as a central component of their story, merchandise, and fandom. It is no longer a secret. I hope people can see it and care about this. Black pills might work as red pills for normies.
I wrote this as I'm researching the whole "liberty campaign" in Central and South America. The official story is that we had some great minds that believed in freedom and helped in the liberation of the Americas from Spanish control. The reality was that a bunch of British operatives stole control of the Americas from the Spaniards and gave it to the British through masonry and central banking. We were never liberated just handed over to the Satanist club. As I ponder this I see how all of our liberators were in reality just freemasons and brainwashing operations put them into a fake pedestal. "if it can be destroyed by the truth, it must be destroyed by the truth". This is a time of rebirth and the options are infinite. True liberty will soon come to the US and then we might do the same down south.
America was built on lies and will stand tall by the truth. There will be a MAGA but only after its population awakens and understands its past and how it has been exploited and exploiting the rest of the world for "them". I don't see greatness in a mountain of lies but in its good people that collectively will come stronger out of a couple of centuries of lies they had to sell first in America in order to conquer the world with them. Great story by the way! They built Washington DC and the Twin towers in order to be "sacrificed" at a later date (astrology and numerology).
This Nation thrived and grew because of the blessing from the Lord on good men of God who honored the Lord.
"Who honors Him, them shall He honor."
Not ignoring the Satanic influence of evil men -they've always been around - just (for myself) placing the emphasis where it always belonged: on God, and on men and women who truly served God, and on decent hard working family men who are the backbone of this nation.
It is no doubt a shock to those who do not know anything about men like Franklin, but it's a good idea to remember who our fellow countrymen were and are on the whole.
Handfuls of evil men? They're always there. Glad we're about to eradicate the last batch, because they appear to have perfected evil.
An artist that went to Bolivia with some rich frends told me that buried people alive below malls so that the sales were good. Some old story about Jesuits who buried alive their fellow soldiers and used their souls for remote viewing. The story goes about how the remote viewing allowd them to see the “gold” of el dorado and that’s why they came to America and killed millions. The secret is a secret because it is inhumane. And they need us to “trust” that the elites are “humane”. Nothing further from the truth.
My investigation suggests the story we have been told about America's founding, the Constitution, the Founding Fathers, etc., is complete hogwash. Our "history" is a fabrication of "good" and "freedom" given to justify something so insidious, it's almost impossible to believe. This isn't, nor has it ever been, "the land of the free," it is the "land of the completely brainwashed."
Digging into Franklin is a great example of this. His background story is total bullshit. So much necessary context is left out of the official version, and we think of the facts stated in terms of the context of today, or along the lines of the rhetoric presented. This method of story telling paints a false picture.
For example, Franklin is presented as coming from humble beginnings. Nothing could be further from the truth. His father owned a big candle making business. History paints it as a "lowly" profession (candle making) but the context left out is that Franklin's father wasn't just a "candle maker" he was the owner of a large profitable business. He had many employees. He was also a local magistrate. Not for the legal structure of the town, but for the Church. The context left out is that the Church WAS the legal structure of the town in the 17th and 18th centuries in New England.
Ben is said to have "not gone to school," and been "self taught." Bullshit. According to the narrative he went to Boston Latin School for a year and had a private tutor for a year. He then went into a printing apprenticeship. The context that is left out of his "self-taught" education is that the school he went to, Boston Latin School, was a school for the Elite. No one but the top of society could go there, and no one but the top of society could afford a private tutor. He likely did take over his own education, but that was almost certainly because he was smart as fuck and he had access to all the books he needed to teach himself, not because the opportunities didn't exist for him to go to school. Indeed, his father had wanted him to become a Minister, like his grandfather. The context left out of that is that a Minister meant going to college. ALL MINISTERS of that time period were from the top of society. Less than 1% of people went to college, and only those born to the "right" families. That opportunity was there for him, even though he didn't take it. That is not an opportunity afforded to anyone but the top of society.
A printing apprenticeship was one of the hardest guilds to get in to. Not only did you already have to know Latin going in (thus restricted to only those with enough education at a young age), but "printers" weren't just people who printed whatever anyone wanted, they were the News Media of the day. They chose what to print, what people saw, what propaganda was shown. They were The News. The printers trade was only afforded to select people, but both Benjamin Franklin and his brother James were printers (he was apprenticed to his brother James).
Franklin was born high, his parents were born high, his grand parents were born high, etc. We look at these things in the context of today, where everyone gets an education (Rockefeller's brainwashing institution), or where being a Minister is not an Elite profession, or without understanding exactly what a printing apprenticeship is. Once you start digging in, and you start comparing the life of these "humble beginnings" people to the opportunities afforded to the other 99% of the population at the time, you see that it's all complete bullshit. Everyone in our history is a member of the One Percent. EVERYONE. They are all members of the Aristocracy, from birth. no matter how low they are placed in "official history."
This little dive into Franklin doesn't even touch on the fact that recent digging in his house found the bodies of children in the cellar, or numerous other little tidbits that shouldn't exist for an "American Hero." I do not think Benjamin Franklin was a very good guy at all, but the Narrative needs heroes, and Ben got to become one of them. I think he was a hero; a hero of the Cabal.
Lots of other goodies about Ben in this paper: http://mileswmathis.com/ben.pdf
Second sentence of the link
.
We will start with his genealogy,
.
I feel an anti-jew rant coming.
.
.It's the jooooos .......... gets tiring.
so do people who write jooooooos
Good thing I only use 5 o's.
Those 7 o bastards are the worst.
I'm certain there are people who come here to spread anti-Jew dogma and haven't even read any Q posts.
It’s funny how it keeps working out that way isn’t it
Franklin's address was 36 Craven. 3-6, 666 etc
That is easy to believe. They were the only ones educated.
Great post. Now do the Confederacy. They were the “good guys” but we were taught in school that they were only fighting to keep their slaves; even though only a small fraction of society actually owned slaves. We were never taught the truth about the real Dishonest Abe or his crushing tariffs on the Southern states.
History is taught by the victor.
I agree with this. And the next level of understanding from that is exploring why the Russian Tsar sent his navy to the US coast and told European countries that an attack on the Union would be war against Russia. Was it bankers using the Confederacy in the same way they run color revolutions now, to disrupt the status quo so they can move in and take even more power?
I’m not denigrating the Confederacy nor glorifying the Union by saying this, any more than I think Black Lives don’t Matter, understand. I’m saying it’s elites cynically (creating and) using social turmoil to their ends.
It’s always bankers fren.
The Confederacy was not the good guys. They were just the other bad guys, the controlled opposition. Yes, they were fighting for State Rights. Yes, it wasn't primarily about slavery, and Abe was almost certainly a willing agent of the Cabal. But the Confederacy was also funded by family Rothschild, doing exactly what they were supposed to do, controlled in exactly the same way as the Yanks.
The House always wins.
You may very well be right. It’s a shame we are not taught that the South was pushed too far just like Americans as a whole today are being pushed to their limit. Hell, it’s global to be honest. Regardless of the goings on behind the scenes, the South was invaded. They didn’t want war and the average Northern soldier didn’t either. The people didn’t have bad intentions. The politicians screwed them then just like they do now. Propaganda had to have been super easy back then.
In my opinion, the grievances Americans hold today outweigh the causes of secession from first the British Crown and then the South from the North. The trespasses on us are very similar but worse in many cases. We even have quartering today. Illegal aliens instead of soldiers.
To your point, I would not doubt one bit that Judah Benjamin was a Rothschild puppet. He turned tail and fled for England when the job was done.
In the end, most wars are banker’s wars.
FTFY
My research suggests there has not been a single war, anywhere in the world, for at least three centuries that was not run, both sides, by the Cabal.
It was. It is even easier now. They only got better as time went on, with more avenues to exploit.
The people never want war. Why would anyone care about what other people are doing a thousand miles away from their home, or ten thousand? The answer is, they don't. The people have to worry about feeding their family, or fixing the barn, etc. If it doesn't have any impact on their life, people don't care very much, no matter what is going on. So how do people become motivated to travel thousands of miles to go murder other people in their homes? The PTB, through propaganda, create a belief in a future impact. If you believe you are under imminent threat, you will go murder other people in their homes. If you further believe your cause is holy or righteous then you will be very motivated to go kill people in their homes.
Of course not everyone will be sufficiently motivated by that propaganda, that's what conscription is for, but creating the belief in a righteous cause and/or imminent danger is an essential first step that helps even the conscripted to swallow the pill. Those efforts of belief creation are always done by the Cabal first, and it is always a lie, based on a partial truth. For the North, it was the belief in abolishing slavery. For the South, it was the belief in defending States Rights. Both were true, albeit not necessarily as true as the people were led to believe.
When you look at any war you can find such propaganda for belief creation (usually on both sides) going back forever. When you look at who is creating those beliefs, it always leads back to the same group of people for every war in at least the past three centuries, with many wars having clear leads to the same group going much further back than that (Crusades e.g.). As it turns out, the people who create the propaganda also happen to be the same people that fund the wars, on both sides.
I lagree, the "Great Experiment" isn't what we thought.
This is one of those threads that makes those unaware hate their own country Don't buy it. It's a gig the media and academia have long pursued. Honestly: do you believe this country is evil, formed from evil and evil to the core?
The Cabal element is. But our fellow countrymen? No. Sleeping is not the same as Satanic. They are not US.
If you attended a church, and there were hundreds of wonderful Christians, a solid fellowship, and the guy standing up front turned out to be a fraud and a creep, would you say "Christianity is bad"?
Correct. They may have founded us on scrupulous grounds but God was really in control the whole time.
If the founding fathers and those who supported them were less than extraordinary, the USA would today be in the same conditions as the United States of Mexico (yes, that's the country's official name), or the various countries liberated by Simón Bolívar, tilting from right-wing strongman to left-wing socialist junta. Our country is exceptional, and was guided by freedom-loving visionaries, regardless of their human flaws.
Just like everything else, establishment of America was a controlled operation, and just like every other time, their controlled operation ultimately got out of their hand and instead ended up becoming the first Constitutional Republic that was outside the clutches of Cabal for almost a 100 years.
False. The control was, at a couple select times, more subtle, but it was still there. However, for most of the time in that first 100 years it was controlled just as it is today, through wars, and debts from those wars. All the Presidents with one possible exception (Jackson) had ties to the Cabal and links to the Banksters. Importantly, they were all Aristocrats and Secret Society members. Even Jackson was an Aristocrat, I think he was just working for a different faction, thus his actions were against the Bankers, but not against the Secret Societies that ruled the world from behind the scenes. I'm not saying that's not a better thing, but it's still not "the land of the free," its "the land of the controlled by Secret Societies from behind the scenes."
The Land of the Free has always been an illusion. The Constitutional Republic was the opposite of what it pretended to be (freedom of We The People). It was set up to Rule us, claiming Sovereignty over our Jurisdiction. Any attempt to paint it as a "good thing" completely misses the reality of what it was, and what it did. It created The Illusion of freedom, while explicitly stating otherwise.
At this point it looks like the constitution is the only thing between us owning guns and having free speech. Yes, the politicians go against it but we can apply to our judicial branch for relief. Obviously, even the judicial system is corrupt but so far they have not been able take our guns. Illusion of freedom or not other countries are looking to us to fight this good fight. Are they wrong to look to us? Are we wrong to take this structure, this nation and want to fight for it? No. A resounding No.
I would suggest it is more like a "Yes, and also a resounding No."
The idea that the Constitution can in any way give you, or even protect your Rights is the fraud. A Constitution can't say anything about your Rights at all, they are your Rights, they are inalienable, they can't be taken away. The fact that we have Laws that attempt to take them away is the fraud. The Constitution plays cover for those Laws, justifying an entirely fraudulent legal system in it's pretense.
In addition, the Constitution itself takes away our Rights. Just look at the fifth amendment. It is full of denial of our inalienable Rights. It lays claim to OUR JURISDICTION, while at the same time proclaiming the opposite. Since these Rights violations are built in to the Constitution itself, that also perpetuates the fraud, because the only way to "get back our Rights" (which is impossible, because they can't be taken away in the first place) is by further Constitutional Amendment, or complete Revolution.
We thus live in a fraudulent system, designed to justify a fraudulent view of what law is, pretending to be about "protecting Rights", when in fact it is all about taking them away slowly but surely, until none exist.
You think we still have freedom of speech? Wrong, we don't. There are numerous "illegal acts of speech," not the least of which is talking about actual Revolution (i.e. planning a real revolution) against the Tyranny of our government and its Constitution. You think we still have freedom to bear arms? Wrong, we don't. There are numerous systems in place to reduce gun ownership (over taxation, price fixing, difficult licensing, impossible licensing in some states for many people, etc.). It should be that everyone has a gun, and is trained to use it. Instead it's more like 10% of the population has one (at least one), and much less than that know how to use it properly. If it came to actual war against the US Govt. (The purpose of 2A) we wouldn't stand a chance. The weapons we can buy are trivial next to what the Govt. has at their disposal. A real civil war of We The People v. the U. S. Govt. would be trivially won by the Govt. in a New York minute. Our access to weapons is just too limited.
We live in the illusion of "protected rights." It's all a farce, an act, a play. That is why the Military is truly the only way. What we are doing now is continuing the play so that the people will think that they have taken back their government, but in reality, the Military had to have stepped in and taken care of everything already.
Do you believe the Cabal got exactly what they had wished with the founding of America?
If they did, it wouldnt have taken then 150 years to get their much coveted world wars to exterminate the pesky monarchies there were always standing in their way, and 250 years to get the world to the edge of the precipice.
Looking at the cabal's actions over history, it appears to me that their belief system involving bloodlines and preservation of them over generations has allowed them to attack problems (for their preferred ultimate outcome) over longer timelines than typical human lifespan ( or alternatively said multi generational and incremental solutions toward the ultimate goal). Since generally populations do not think generationally and do not focus much on bloodlines, the population is unable to consider or fathom the slow incremental attacks on the population by the current and next generations of cabal members. So risk tends to go to 0% and success over time goes to 100%.
The reality is boiling a frog (population) fast has a high likelihood of meeting direct resistance and failure. Boiling the same frog ( population) slowly over multiple incremental and generational steps toward the ultimate goal has a high likelihood of going unnoticed and succeeding without any noteworthy resistance. ---Makes me think of why operation warp speed was a success for Trump as it accelerated the boiling events far too quickly and guaranteed substantial resistance would occur --
One might even argue that Andrew Jackson was responsible for preventing the first (more rapid) attempt to get the population to quickly proceed to where the cabal desired it be in a shorter timespan. Thus the failure there required they regroup and begin attacking again from a different point on a multi generational timescale.
So did the constitution give the cabal what they ultimately wanted for America? No, it provided a framework with baked in weaknesses that could be exploited to erode the population's liberties and thus generate multiple paths to that end. The things the cabal didn't get immediately were not achieved because they were not possible to do or accomplish on the generation that composed the population at that time.
I believe the better question is did the cabal get what they wanted for that generation in the constitution? To this I believe the answer is yes because the framework (Constitution) allowed sufficient cover for them to operate and erode the freedoms and liberties understood by the people without having to be completely exposed in the process. Also, the constitution was substantially better for the cabal's ultimate goals than the preceding Articles of Confederation since it created a federal government with actual power which centralized the points of control that should be attacked to pave the way for their incremental multi generational plans.
Since the cabal generally understands what kind of measured multi-generational approach is necessary within a given generation to continue movement and inertia toward their ultimate goal, I would argue from that perspective the cabal did get what was realistically achievable.
Really I see the cabal as being backed by spiritual satanic forces (demons, principalities, Satan) whom do not age or die like humans and whom intend to battle Creator God for control of all domains (physical and spiritual (or perhaps alternatively described as higher multidimensional)). Given that the human bloodlines and families are serving and following these evil forces, the generational continuity of the cabal has been preserved far more consistently and more successfully than the typical non cabal affiliated family. I have often noticed that there is inevitably (typically at generation #3 or #4 if the original successful generation did not neglect their own children) a generation of idiots whom squander the previous successful generation's progress in moving their family up in society. This results in a reset for the family back to a typically average state compared to the general population.
This is probably the best analysis I have seen about the subject of Constitution, kudos. I do believe this deserves to be its own post on a slow news day (if we indeed have such days in the near future!)
I agree with the observation that Cabal is backed by satanic forces and operate on much longer time scales in multigenerational operations.
I also agree with the boiling of the frogs analogy, however, I would like to borrow that analogy and refine it a bit further to make a point.
Imagine this pot full of water in which frogs live, but the controls to heat and cool the water is inside the pot, accessible only to frogs. Further assume that the controls are very many, and each one increments just a little bit. Naturally, frogs would constantly be moving the controls, but the hot and cold changes usually cancel out.
The only way the Cabal can destroy the frogs is to trick the frogs into making changes to the controls so that overall changes to hot is more than cold.
So if things go smoothly, the frogs gradually keep making the water hotter and hotter, by their own volition, and not even realise it, until they are all cooked.
However, the side effect of this approach is that, there are always a small subset of frogs who are especially observant and who understand what is going in. They cannot stop it, because its a collective problem. Only way to stop it is to make all the frogs understand this design and this problem. An awakening.
Until then, all they can do is impart this information to a few others, no matter how small that number is, and make it part of their collective memory, so that one day it may lead to the awakening.
Infact, I would argue that in this system the only possible solution out of this is the awakening of a majority of the frogs. Everything else is temporary fixes.
So the problem boils down to - is the speed at which the frogs are being boiled slower or faster, then the speed at which the awakening could happen ?
If you agree that this reasonably represents where we find ourselves in this boiling frog analogy, I can make my next point.
While I agree with both of these claims, I make the case that this is just one side of the boiling frog equation - the speed of boiling. And the claims simply state that the constitution provided a way for the boiling to proceed.
However, the other side of the equation we should ask is, did the constitution also provide a speed of awakening? And whether this speed of awakening was faster than the speed of boiling?
And to that, the answer would be this:
The Founding of United States and its constitution is one of the very few human conceptions, that ensured that the speed of awakening was always sustained in the right amount to be able to ultimately be faster than the speed of boiling. The founding itself seared the ideas of Liberty into the very soul of the people, and the Constitution provided enough safeguards to ensure every boiling action produced enough friction to also sustain the awakening action.
In other words, without this Constitution we would never had enough white hats, embedded in all aspects of the society, no matter how deeply controlled by the Cabal, to such an extent that this ultimate Q operation was not only possible, but inevitable.
For me, its the exact opposite. Even with control at every point, they still didn't manage to create a vassal state. They still had to slog more than 150 years before they could get their world wars to exterminate European monarchies, and it took them another more than 250 years to get to this point right now.
If Land of the Free was an illusion and it fought back so hard, imagine what we will have after Post Awakening.
In a way I agree. Ultimately, we are free, and that freedom can't be taken away. But we have been taught to believe in fraudulent legal systems and fraudulent systems of government that are designed to create an illusion of freedom while being exactly the opposite. That fraudulent system includes the original United States.
So yes, we are free, and we always have been, because that is a gift from Source, but we also have trained beliefs that cause us to give up our freedom through the illusion. That illusion goes much deeper than most realize, even those who are "awakened."
This never would have happened without Q, so I suggest it wasn't the "Land of the Free" that fought back, but a few people who sit near the top of the fraudulent system who are teaching us how to fight back after the real war has already been won ("The Military is the only way").
I think OP is dooming. The USA always had a head start and a leg up over every other revolution, because of its founding principles and the relative selflessness of its leaders. If George Washington had been Simon Bolivar, our history would be very different. The founding fathers did an exceptional job and gave us a legacy like no other country.
Well that’s a blackpill
Understanding reality is not a "black pill," it is a necessary step in Awakening.
We have been trained to ignore evidence. Learning how to look at evidence reveals the Illusion. The Great Awakening is understanding that there is an illusion, and understanding its details. Those details are not "black pills," they are red pills. If you turn it into black because you don't like it, that's on you.
Its a black pill for me. I always thought of Ben Franklin as amazing founding father. But these revelations. Its a lot like learning that your father is a sith lord. I'm still having a hard time buying it. But that's what research is for.
It is best to not put your faith in men. Not even yourself. Trust God.
2 Corinthians 1:9 (KJV) But we had the sentence of death in ourselves, that we should not trust in ourselves, but in God which raiseth the dead.
I dunno I think some redpills can be blackpills. I mean if you take those idea that everyone has to know the truth about everything then I guess keep sending those blacks - eh, redpills. But look at our country before ww2 it was pretty based and most people only knew that they had to get up tomorrow to go to work and to Churxh on Sunday to praise god and then to go do some baby making and the rest worked itself out. We had a homogenous high trust society that was 95% white and not infiltrated by the eternal enemy and it all was pretty damn good. Now we have the world at our fingertips while the place is overrun. Now there’s a blackpill for you
And the nation itself was made up of Christian patriots for the most part. Creepy stuff at the top? Almost always.
Do you remember, years ago, when that woman stood up at the mic and said God told her to tell the people: this Nation WAS founded for God, by Christians, and we shouldn't believe we were formed from evil. She was dragged off stage and called crazy, and fired. I think she was a court reporter or something.
That resonated. She was right. Or rather: God was right 😉 I don't get too involved in rabbit holes like this anymore, because it removes focus on who REAL Americans were.
That and who we are as patriots. Whatever reason for our founding, here we are now in this space and time. We have more freedoms, though under attack, than most of the world. We are close to being as free as we've ever experienced in our lifetimes.
I did research long ago on all those guys. Some founding fathers were good men, others were total sick-o's and crazy. Ben Franklin was a sick-o and had a friend he wanted to come over to America from England, his name was Dr. Benjamin Rush.
If you ever wonder where the bodies came from under the house it was from Dr. Benjamin Rush. Ben Franklin was the father of the modern prison as you know it today. He built the large Eastern penitentiary in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The things they did to people was not good and a lot of men went insane in that place. They did crazy psychiatry experiments on a lot of those folks as well as medical experiments too.
The inmates lived in complete isolation. There was total silence in the whole penitentiary and your face was covered a lot. It would make you go insane. When people died they took them and did experiments on dead people also. When they uncovered the bodies they did check and found what was done to some of them.
In case you didn't know Dr. Benjamin Rush also signed the Declaration of independence. So there is 2 sick-o's Ben Franklin was a pervert
From what I’ve learned, discerned, America, capitalism, freedom was a mechanism to fund the military industrial complex for global control. For how many times I’ve said Jefferson would roll over in his grave if he knew what’s happening today… they all could have been shills. I look at the symbology of the layout of DC and it becomes obvious…. Unless history was re-written and DC existed before we know. America wasn’t founded by Columbus and may have been the equivalent playground of the satanists, similar to Epstein island, and freedom of religion was to secure that end. That being said, what I believed the founding docs were meant to be is what I hope finally prevails. Trust God, heaven knows if it were up to me I’d flood the whole damn thing, may need a slightly bigger boat.
I smell MI-6
Alrighty then, well I liked the illusion of the Founding. If we didn’t get it right for the benefit of the people the first time, we shall get it right the second time around and live up to it!
Exactly, we have been slowly advancing into the apocalypse "lifting of the veil" or "disclosure" of very harsh truths but once the veil gets lifted, the emperor has no clothes
There's always the citizenry. It's not REALLY about a handful of creeps with ill intentions.
I recommend the book How The Nation Was Won by H Graham Lowry.
He covers this but his claim was that Franklin was essentially using them to gain intelligence and trolling them.
It also covers the Jesuits and how they took control of the British crown in the century leading up to the revolution.
DC had one during the 1960s called The Quorum Club. There was a big cover up protecting those who fornicated with commie women back then. Swalwell is an example of how today’s treason was treated back then.
These struggles have followed our people since our migrations outward from the holy land. History is alot different
I saw this the other night on Josh Gates "Expedition X" where he has two minions blundering around looking at stuff. I think Josh does a lot of stuff and probably owns the travel channel by now. I like his shows. Lots of fun.
I keep seeing more stuff about Hell fire club. Saw t-shirts in Walmart promoting it.
Many mainstream TV shows and movies include Hellfire as a central component of their story, merchandise, and fandom. It is no longer a secret. I hope people can see it and care about this. Black pills might work as red pills for normies.
I wrote this as I'm researching the whole "liberty campaign" in Central and South America. The official story is that we had some great minds that believed in freedom and helped in the liberation of the Americas from Spanish control. The reality was that a bunch of British operatives stole control of the Americas from the Spaniards and gave it to the British through masonry and central banking. We were never liberated just handed over to the Satanist club. As I ponder this I see how all of our liberators were in reality just freemasons and brainwashing operations put them into a fake pedestal. "if it can be destroyed by the truth, it must be destroyed by the truth". This is a time of rebirth and the options are infinite. True liberty will soon come to the US and then we might do the same down south.
America is the Great Satan thanks to England controlling it to do the devils work.
So are you one of those people who say America was never great when we say MAGA?
America was built on lies and will stand tall by the truth. There will be a MAGA but only after its population awakens and understands its past and how it has been exploited and exploiting the rest of the world for "them". I don't see greatness in a mountain of lies but in its good people that collectively will come stronger out of a couple of centuries of lies they had to sell first in America in order to conquer the world with them. Great story by the way! They built Washington DC and the Twin towers in order to be "sacrificed" at a later date (astrology and numerology).
This Nation thrived and grew because of the blessing from the Lord on good men of God who honored the Lord.
"Who honors Him, them shall He honor."
Not ignoring the Satanic influence of evil men -they've always been around - just (for myself) placing the emphasis where it always belonged: on God, and on men and women who truly served God, and on decent hard working family men who are the backbone of this nation.
It is no doubt a shock to those who do not know anything about men like Franklin, but it's a good idea to remember who our fellow countrymen were and are on the whole.
Handfuls of evil men? They're always there. Glad we're about to eradicate the last batch, because they appear to have perfected evil.
Digging skeletons out of the closet
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/why-was-benjamin-franklins-basement-filled-with-skeletons-524521/
Old skeletons make great composting grounds. Let truth flourish as the force of nature it is.
An artist that went to Bolivia with some rich frends told me that buried people alive below malls so that the sales were good. Some old story about Jesuits who buried alive their fellow soldiers and used their souls for remote viewing. The story goes about how the remote viewing allowd them to see the “gold” of el dorado and that’s why they came to America and killed millions. The secret is a secret because it is inhumane. And they need us to “trust” that the elites are “humane”. Nothing further from the truth.