Yep. Every. Single. Time.

One of the biggest whoa moment for me was when every single parent in sandy hook relocated immediately after. 100%. A complete statistical improbability, even more so when you factor economic status, job, etc.

There are probably deep state agents that are shrinks, looking for good prospects for patsies or MKUltra zombies.

If they are reporting correctly that this guy is a tactical expert, he will have no problem escaping capture, he has the gear. If he can get into the "great northern forest", it is 30 million acres of deep wilderness, it encompasses maine, new hampshire, vermont and new york. Easy to hide out for 30 days .

Good question. Written like "first follower ever," but would have to ask the digger.

It reads like "first person to follow the account" itself.

But this is also why deleting this stuff only benefits the criminals. Unless the guy is still controlling his own Twitter, this would be TwitX or unsavory bureaucrats. But something tells me the former has a bit more on his plate right now than covering up Twitter.

Quick edit: But I'm not sure that Twitter is sorting in (reverse) chronological order -- and the API does not make the order publicly available from what I can find from searching.

It doesn't even strictly matter if they were the first or last follower or anything in between, that's a really weird person to be following some semi-random guy on Twitter.

What good is following a shooter's account after they have done the shooting? They aren't going to post any new content if they're on the run, in custody, or dead.

A more precise question is, was he the first follower after he had been publicly ID'd.

Given that this was "post worthy" from another anon, I'd go out on a limb and say he was probably the very first follower of the account.

It wouldn't be surprising to anyone if anyone was the first to follow after the events unfolded

Studied at Quaid-i-Azam_University in Pakistan?

Tell me why a university needs to shut down for that incident? Theybwant everybody's collective thought on this. Immersion in their narrative. Resist

Can we find the original twitter post??

Expect upticks in illegitimate calls for 'mental health checks' for anyone to the right of Marx.

This is where punitive medicine comes into play. Those abroad should not know that there is resistance in the USSR, our fellow citizens should not be inspired by the example of these units, and the truth about the USSR should not be heard either abroad or within the country. But organizing trials is too noisy, killing without trial is too scandalous. And another way out was found - to declare political opponents mentally ill.

Accusing dissidents of mental inferiority is to some extent subconscious and a priori in nature. Who among us has not, upon seeing the action of a person whose motives are not clear to us, exclaim: “Crazy!” The social behavior of dissidents goes beyond the strictly defined norms of social behavior of Soviet people. This behavior is dictated by other moral categories that are not normal by Soviet standards. The Soviet authorities and, it must be admitted, a significant part of our society, if they do not consider dissidents to be violent madmen, then in any case regard them as unusual, strange people, deviating from the norm. Here lies the possibility of a subtle transition from the concept of unusualness or non-triviality to the concept of madness. If crazy people are assessed by medical categories, then unusualness and abnormality are assessed by universal human, everyday ones. With the light hand of the Snezhnevskys and Luntsy, these criteria, and the concepts themselves, became almost adequate and equivalent.

During the revolution of 1917, governments did not need such a sophisticated punitive measure as isolation in mental hospitals. If the tsarist government did not abuse punitive psychiatry, then under the Provisional Revolutionary Government (March-October 1917) this was unthinkable. Democracy in Russia then reached the highest level, which was not seen either before or since. Terror began only after the October Revolution with the coming to power of the Bolsheviks, more precisely, in the spring of 1918, and from September 5 it was legalized as “mass”. The communists dealt with political opponents simply and quickly. Those dissatisfied with the regime were executed administratively. The revolutionary tribunals handed down death sentences without lengthy judicial delays and formalities, guided by revolutionary legal consciousness. The idea of isolating someone in a mental hospital, apparently, could not even come to mind, the punitive measures against dissidents were so harsh and unambiguous.

Any indignation, protests and resentment over forced hospitalization will be regarded by psychiatrists as evidence of mental illness. The situation here is truly hopeless. This machine grinds everyone. It is impossible to defend yourself because you are declared mentally ill, or to protest because you are not arrested, or to appeal because you are not convicted.

— Alexander Podrabinek, “Punitive Medicine”, 1979

feel like this is definitely some sort of "punishment" so to speak for yesterday's MAGA win....O and also coincidentally Xiden has a presser scheduled on "assault" weapons ban today

He probably spends time here on the boards. Wouldn't surprise me

Correct

No, just the ones that are. Which is like 99.99 percent.

I’d say the ones that had drills the same day that are exact replicas of the incidents that take place are high up on that list. Which is like a good chunk of the biggest most well known events.

Also the ones where shoes magically change, men in camo running through the woods are instantly released out of the front of cop cars, ones where the shooter manages to carry 30+ firearms, cameras, censors, and barricades themselves in high security areas while using wonky bump fires to shoot down from the top of a huge building while also making daid bump fire sound like a chain fed machine gun, while police cameras around the city capture the sound of automatic gunfire going off AFTER the shooter had killed himself, oh and all the officers are also saying swat went in and killed him, contrary to the official report.

The shootings which just so happen to push an agenda they just so happen to be heavily trying to push. Anti lynch legislation? Annnnd lynchings are happening. Anti Q narrative? Annnnd crazy Q bomber covers his van in Q memes. Anti gun narrative? Annnnd shooter carry’s one of each type of gun, black powder, and even a California compliant ar 15 which resembled a nerf gun and is essential useless. The false flags which justify 20 years of war in Middle East, or for the patriot act to strip our freedom…

And so on and so on, etc.

I'd say first follower of the account. It's almost expected to receive followers after an incident like this and not particularly noteworthy, but the FIRST ever follower of this guy would be noteworthy.

That's a good question, I think it is likely that it's the latter, idk if you can see who the first follower is.

Hiding the evidence