I've heard people saying that dry oil wells are capped, but people sometimes go back to them at a later time and they're replenished. Maybe oil is a naturally occurring product of the earth.
When ANYONE says that OIL is a fossil fuel...ask them the question:
IF oil is a fossil fuel then how come the dinosaurs that roamed the earth and find the bones that are made from Calcium, how in God's green earth did those calcified bones become a fossil fuel??????
Being that I am from Texas, oil wells quit producing are capped, during the duration of being capped they are checked once-in-awhile to see if there is anything in the well...GUESS WHAT???? THERE IS...it is freaking OIL...God made this earth to be self regenerative and has done so since the 1920's and before that...
These ECO freaks can go and blow that smoke they are selling down a dirty well and see what happens......😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁
I'm from Texas too and you are 100% correct. When I was a kid, we bought some property that had a capped well on it but we didn't get the mineral rights with the land. Several years later we had to let the original owners who still owned the mineral rights install a pump jack because the well had come back to life so to speak. We didn't make anything off of the well but we did get to charge them for the road access and road repair costs because we put the road in.
I wish we did get the mineral rights because they discovered the old surveys were wrong and there was also a lot of natural gas. I think they stopped extracting the oil and started pumping out the natural gas for a while. I suspect this is going to be going on a lot now that the entire area has been developed. Once you get about 30 miles west of Houston, there are huge deposits of both oil and natural gas and I understand that the oil is of the light, sweet variety that's cheaper to refine.
I lived in Houston...Worked for Fluor Engineering and put in THE LAST OIL REFINERY in Meterie', La...WOWZA!!!
And yes, that SWEET CRUDE IS THE "MOTHER LODE" of oil...Take out of the ground, put it through a separator stack to take out the impurities and BOOM...refined oil cheaply...
NOTE: NO one KNOW HOW MUCH OIL Texas has but it is a bunch due to West Texas being partially desert...
All that is needed for oil is carbon and hydrogen. Most crude oil also has some other contaminants like sulfur which must be removed in the refining process. Fossils contain all of those elements. I'm not sure where you got this information, but either someone misinformed you or you have oversimplified what they were trying to say.
Why are people Downvoting you with no response? This is true. Oil and all of its derivatives are just that, hydrocarbons. I’d love the source of the “chemists” that have shown this firmly established chemistry is false.
I'm not an expert on the subject, but I think you have understood the statement backwards.
It's not that 'all that is needed is carbon and hydrogen', it's that decaying plant and animal matter contain other elements that are not found in oil.
As a (hypothetical) example, if a certain percentage of decaying animal matter is calcium from bones, why don't we see that same percentage of calcium in the oil? (Or at least, why is there not enough calcium to account for the bones, etc.)
This is answered if you’d like, by the fact that oil
IS in fact pretty unique to where it’s coming from due to the variables in what creates it and the reservoir itself. Oil refineries themselves aren’t all uniform, they are unique to their feedstock, even if the principles are the same. Sour oil for instance, is crude oil with very high levels of sulfur, and a refinery that refines a more standard crude would face catastrophic difficulties in refining it.
Either way, the hydrocarbon is the only bit that matters, the other trace elements don’t occur in large quantities, and part of the refining process itself implies things like calcium are “processed” out and left for the “bottom of the barrel” which is fuel that giant ships run, and it’s most certainly got all sorts of random components in its general makeup.
I'm not sure if you don't understand the issue, or you are trying to be evasive.
The answer does not lie in 'what was processed out', but what is in the raw crude that comes out of the ground. Is there calcium (for instance) in the crude? And if not, how could it have been made from animal matter?
I’m not sure you understood my reply. I was playing devils advocate for the most part. The entire argument being presented is still operating on the assumption that crude oil is just old dinosaur bones. Or something? I guess I don’t know why anyone would think that the forces and processes involved with how this stuff forms would leave all the calcium from animal bones right there in the mix, unless it’s still a misunderstanding. This stuff was comprised almost entirely of plant life anyways, not things that had bones.
Correct. I'm in the energy business and we get the monthly Oil & Gas magazines.
15+ years ago I remember reading in one of those mags where a couple old capped wells were checked. I only saw it in the mag but one would "think" that a discovery like that would be on the nightly news. We know why it wasn't.
The media would have to spin and say that more dinosaurs had recently perished and fell into the well to change into oil.
The oil companies do this and get a lot of crap from the shareholders when they do specifically because they believe the myth that oil is finite and comes from decayed plant and animal life. There is no such thing as peak oil.
There is probably a peak amount we can take at one time before all accessible fields drain before they can fill back up. There must be some balance point of extraction versus how quick the earth refills.
Fracking has been made into a taboo and evil word.
However, the process is fairly simple.
When an oil well goes dry, the oil companies make a slurry of liquids and highly spherical silica sand, 95% SiO2. This purity keeps it from breaking down when mixed with gases and oil.
They then send this slurry down the well and blast it into the well. The explosion creates new crevices in the rock formations and often revitalizes an expired well. Rather than drill more wells, the companies can reactivate old wells and make them produce again.
The natural gas and oil has been produced over the course of hundreds of millions of years, and so has the sand that is used to frack. Many of the high grade pure white silica sands are found in the midwest where 200 to 300 million years ago there were oceans with waves that rolled the silica into the spherical shape.
As we know, an egg shape can withstand great pressure, so too, can spherical sand. The importance of the spherical sand is the ability to hold the newly fracture rock crevices open so oil and gas can leak through. The shape is strong but also provides the gaps necessary for oil and gas to pass through them.
fracking leads to crappy water in the wells that are in close proximity to the fracking areas. i lived it. it ruined our well water. and no one came running to help us.
I am certainly against any efforts that ruin clean drinking water or create other environmental hazards. Surface strip mining for lithium and rare earth materials is something to watch closely as well. (which by the way, China owns the vast majority of rare earth mines in the world, including US mines)
It's my understanding that fracking takes place 1 to 2 miles below the surface, well beyond a typical water well for drinking.
Not disagreeing with you and I would feel the exact same way if my water was tainted by contaminants.
Wells that are fracked are existing wells that have already run dry and are reactivated by the process.
See my reply above...that is ABSOLUTELY CORRECT...once the fissures are broken, the slime and oil mix can cock up a real nice water well...that is why it is USED ONLY in certain circumstances...
This is one of the concerns I've had. I believe there can be good applications of fracking but I hear a lot of negative side effects from the practice being done in close proximity to the fracking zones. I'm guessing it needs to be done far enough away from populated areas, but I'm also guessing that the contamination can spread quite far. Not sure what the solution would be since I'm not an expert on the topic.
I'm pro-gas but admittedly have fallen victim to some of the fracking propaganda with water table fouling and strange emissions coming out of the faucets of residents living within nearby fracking zones. What is the truth of this? I want to be pro-fracking because it's another energy solution, but need some of my concerns alleviated.
There probably needs to be some limit on depth (or minimum depth) of fracking to prevent water tables from being fouled. Or possibly distance to populated areas, or both. The oil companies are going to swear it is fine and doesn't affect water but there is too much evidence out there that it does.
I was conducting a safety and environmental audit on an international drilling company headquartered in Houston, TX. While interviewing a drilling engineer and geologist I asked them that very same question. They replied that yes that a previously dry oil reservoir, after a period of time, will fill back up with oil. I also have a friend who is a petroleum chemist who said the same thing. Rockefeller and his Standard Oil Company wanted to push the idea of scarcity.
I've said since middle school that there weren't enough dinosaurs ever to produce as much oil as there is, and that was a long long time and millions of barrels ago.
That’s because “fossil fuels” is a misnomer. My understanding is that it’s pretty similar to coal, just different compositions subjected to different conditions(temperature, time). The very foundations of these can be seen at any time by visiting a peat bog. TLDR not dinosaurs, just giant ancient forests. My source is a 40 year higher up engineer in the industry(oil platforms,derricks, and fields) for what it’s worth. 🤷♂️
The first use of the term "fossil fuel" occurs in the work of the German chemist Caspar Neumann, in English translation in 1759.[22] The Oxford English Dictionary notes that in the phrase "fossil fuel" the adjective "fossil" means "[o]btained by digging; found buried in the earth", which dates to at least 1652,[23] before the English noun "fossil" came to refer primarily to long-dead organisms in the early 18th century.[24]
Its not dinosaurs that produce oil. Most oil fields were likely large swamps in depository basins or on continental margins or maybe very shallow anoxic coastal waters under certain conditions. Go to somewhere like this today and you have enormous amounts of decaying organic matter that settles in them. Then for whatever reason these swamps had their organic matter "capped" by other erosion deposits that form an impermeable barrier protecting them from the atmosphere. These in turn are buried under sedimentary deposits and the heat and pressure deeper in the earths crust forms oil. Today we can mimic this process industrially through various means whether its using natural gas as a feed stock, you can use coal or even in theory decaying organic matter. The thing is though for widespread application it cannot compete with the natural deposits we have.
Because of our oxygen atmosphere and high UV exposure from the sun it makes hydrocarbons unstable in our atmosphere there are only certain geological conditions where this process can happen.
This is where it gets dicey on both sides of the aisle. By that I mean both republicans and democrats are right while both are also wrong. The illusion of choice is strong here. Republicans are right with say things like drill, drill, drill in the current situation we are in and democrats are also right in saying we are destroying our eco systems but they think lithium batteries are the answer and windmills, solar panels etc but it does more harm than good and a money laundering scheme, not to mention the throusands of years it takes to biodegrade even nuclear energy. When in reality all of it should be eliminated and we should be demanding for free energy (think Tesla towers, energy propulsion etc). Think of like never having to "charge" your phone again. All this stuff is out there and suppressed along with the 5,800 + energy related patents that are confiscated for muh "national security".
Do you know if anyone figured out how Tesla was going to make Wardenclyffe Tower work? I recently watched the Tesla files and was curious. I haven’t been able to find anything on the web that would suggest that it had been figured out. I know Tesla coils work, but that tower was a whole other level.
Sort of. From my understanding nobody has a working model of his technology (or similar technologies), but we do understand at least the basics of how they work. Some names to start your research are Eric Dollard, John Keely, Dewey Larson, John Bedini, Walter Russell, Tom Bearden, Ken Wheeler, and there's more, that's off the top of my head.
Each of them have slightly different theories as to how the universe works, but there's great similarities between how all of them think. The core principles seem to be...
-The Universe seems to be an interplay of two opposing forces, Gravitation and Radiation (One inward/concentrative force and another outward/expanding force)
-Aether Theory > Atomic Theory (All space is filled with an Aether, and matter is just the motion or "flow" of that Aether. Take empty space which is the base state of the Aether and induce motion in the form of a toroidal vortex waveform and concentrate it, and you get matter. Light, Sound, gravitational waves, etc are just certain motions/flow states or "waves" in the Aether)
-Electricity is 4-dimensional rather than 2-dimensional (Flows through space and counter-space, also involves dielectricity and magnetism. Modern electrical theory doesn't recognize all of the dimensions, only some of them. Using all of the dimensions of electricity should allow for all this "space age technology" we hear about, faster than light travel, electricity transmission over distance instantly without losses, zero point energy, etc)
-Figuring out how Electricity works would also allow for healing technology, and other "dangerous" technologies. As matter is simply a "flow structure" of the Aether, and electricity is also a movement or waveform of the Aether, applying Electricity in the proper way should be able to form, change, or dissolve matter at will. Could be used for the good, or for evil. This may be part of why this technology was hidden in the first place. That kind of power in the wrong hands could be planet/civilization destroying, and would make nukes look like firecrackers
-Resonance/Harmonics plays a big part into it I think. Think of how pushing a kid on a swing requires a very small amount of energy to cause a lot of movement if you push the kid at exactly the right time, in comparison to random pushes with random amounts of force. Applying power in a specific resonant way could allow the extraction of energy that's hundreds (thousands) of times the amount of energy that's put in. Tesla mentions 3s, 6s, and 9s to be extra important for some reason. Maybe experiment with feeding a coil the 3rd, 6th, and 9th harmonic of the calculated resonant frequency of the coil? Tesla did a lot of work with impulses, so make sure these are impulses being fed in?
Idk, being completely honest I don't really know entirely what I'm talking about, I've just tried reading as much as I possibly can from Tesla, and anyone who's trying to do anything remotely related to what he was doing. I feel like if we crowdsourced research and had a whole bunch of people a lot smarter than me work together, we might get somewhere on this. Maybe we should create an "electricity.win" or something, and have as many people as possible start reading these papers and books, start bouncing ideas off of each other. I bet within a year we could crack the secret. Plus doing this sort of research takes a lot of equipment. Some of us know a lot of the theory of tesla tech but don't have equipment to test it, others have rooms full of equipment but have no idea where to begin.
This got kinda long and messy, but anyone with me? I'm being serious here that I think this can be done.
Yes, Tesla did. Read the patents. Read the books. Look for online forums. There are people out there who have recreated Teslas work and are currently working on that type of technology. Eric Dollard is a interesting guy.
You say Dems are right that we are destroying our ecosystem but that’s not true either. There’s nothing we are doing to destroy anything. More carbon means more plants growth. God made our world perfect and able to withstand the minuscule impact of man.
I love this guy! This guy has so much passion and character. He is a pleasure to listen to and watch. I found his personality to be just as enthralling as the data he was sharing. SOMEBODY, Tucker, anyone, I know he won’t do it because he clearly happy in what he is doing but someone should try to poach this guy for a hard hitting redpill science show.
“Fossil fuels” are made up of certain molecules that fossils happen to turn into. There’s no reason those molecules could also naturally occur elsewhere without fossils being present. They would be the same as fossil fuels, but they just didn’t come from fossils.
Essentially fossil fuels exist because decaying organic matter concentrated the building blocks necessary to build long chain hydrocarbons. Many processes on Earth have a biological origin. The only reason our atmosphere has an oxygen content is that organisms developed the means to photosynthesise about 2 billion years ago - they displaced the original organisms which dominated the earth most of which survive today underground or in "extreme" environments. The only reason we have coal and why most of it dates to about 300 million years ago is that plants colonised land, learned a lot of new tricks to better cope with it and earth become dominated by large humid swampy forests for tens of millions of years. Trees are basically made of cellulose and it took tens of millions of years for other organisms to develop the means to break them down. You look at a log in the forest today that is dead and look at all the critters eating it. Coal deposits don't really form anymore.
With the amount of fake information out there, it's really tough to know that for sure. We're walking blind out here until the Government and Multinational's release the real History that belongs to us.
I might not be the smartest person, hell, I believe the moon was placed into orbit by some intelligent race. But it's not that far a stretch from there to believe that Fossil Fuels are not decaying organic matter.
Let's be clear. Given the proper precursors, carbon and hydrogen, and sufficient pressure and time, oil and natural gas can be made in theory. The precursors can come from biological sources like fossils, OR they can come from other carbon and hydrogen deposits that just so happen to exist on the planet. It's not a conspiracy. This is actually taught in school.
However, NOTHING creates oil at the rate we are using it...approximately 100 Million barrels per day. If this were done in any form, the earth would have been doing so even before we started using it. For millions and millions of years. There would be a Pacific Ocean size puddle of oil somewhere.
There isn't, so there are 3 possibilities.
Abiotic oil simply doesn't exist.
As Dr. Soon says in that video, large amounts of abiotic oil MAY exist way down in the mantle, but we obviously don't yet have technology to reach it. So if it exists, it's not usable today as an energy source.
Abiotic oil may exist and be accessible in the crust, BUT if this is true, the creation rate must be very, very slow. Not significantly faster than the replacement rate from fossil precursors.
This is not some big secret. The other thing that Dr. Soon says which is also true, is that much of the oil in the ground today is left stranded. Oil doesn't exist in a puddle. It is trapped in rocks. You can force water into the rocks to try and push it out, but you can never get 100% of it. There is room for enhanced recovery techniques at a more expensive price point.
Do keep in mind though, that at some point, when you have expended as much energy to extract and pump a barrel of oil as you get from that barrel of oil, oil is no longer usable as a fuel source, even though it may still exist in the ground. Yes, the globalists have blown this way out of proportion, but it doesn't mean that there are no physical limits at all. We need to be smart about how we use the resources God has given us.
"There would be a Pacific Ocean size puddle of oil somewhere."
Who says there isn't? Dr. Soon points out that we barely scratch the surface with our drilling tech. There might be an enormous reservoir we just cannot access it with current tech.
The most abundant element in the universe is hydrogen. Our most abundant resource on earth is water, H20. Two parts Hydrogen, one part oxygen.
Using hydrogen as a fuel source would basically be limitless.
Splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen would create fuel and air to breathe. Seems pretty simple.
If there is any technology that is most certainly being hidden from society it is using water for fuel. It's being hidden because it is cheap, free, and abundant. There is no way to make money from such a massive resource. But there it is.
The problem is thermodynamics get in the way here. You have to put energy in to split the hydrogen out. Hydrogen is incredibly difficult to work with. Its highly explosive, difficult to compress and bottle and leaks out of anything your store it in. Hydrogen isn't a fuel source, you can use it as a carrier of energy but you get SIGNIFICANT losses in the process.
Free hydrogen would be a very valuable resource but its not available on our planet because of our oxygen rich atmosphere. Oddly enough in the outer solar system worlds like Titan which in many ways is probably similar to Earth 4 billion years ago have plenty of it but no free Oxygen. On Titan the hydro-logical cycle is based on liquid hydrocarbons like Methane because its so cold and water ice is like silicate rocks in the inner solar system.
It’s all established science with answers known to the industry. It’s interesting that ideas and thoughts which oil companies have a vested interest in making the public hate, are so vehemently hated here. These companies do what’s profitable, just because an old well has a little pressure after potentially decades means very little, they would need to be gushing oil again and be completely full to make the capital needed worth it. High producing oil fields can operate at some eye watering pressures for the giant deep ones (10-15,000 psi).
I've heard people saying that dry oil wells are capped, but people sometimes go back to them at a later time and they're replenished. Maybe oil is a naturally occurring product of the earth.
Chemists have shown that the components of oil could not come from decayed plants and animals. There are many elements missing.
When ANYONE says that OIL is a fossil fuel...ask them the question:
IF oil is a fossil fuel then how come the dinosaurs that roamed the earth and find the bones that are made from Calcium, how in God's green earth did those calcified bones become a fossil fuel??????
Being that I am from Texas, oil wells quit producing are capped, during the duration of being capped they are checked once-in-awhile to see if there is anything in the well...GUESS WHAT???? THERE IS...it is freaking OIL...God made this earth to be self regenerative and has done so since the 1920's and before that...
These ECO freaks can go and blow that smoke they are selling down a dirty well and see what happens......😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁
I'm from Texas too and you are 100% correct. When I was a kid, we bought some property that had a capped well on it but we didn't get the mineral rights with the land. Several years later we had to let the original owners who still owned the mineral rights install a pump jack because the well had come back to life so to speak. We didn't make anything off of the well but we did get to charge them for the road access and road repair costs because we put the road in.
Good on Ya'!!!! Outstanding...People just didn't know back then that the mineral have to be CONVEYED when selling the land...OOOOPS...
I wish we did get the mineral rights because they discovered the old surveys were wrong and there was also a lot of natural gas. I think they stopped extracting the oil and started pumping out the natural gas for a while. I suspect this is going to be going on a lot now that the entire area has been developed. Once you get about 30 miles west of Houston, there are huge deposits of both oil and natural gas and I understand that the oil is of the light, sweet variety that's cheaper to refine.
I lived in Houston...Worked for Fluor Engineering and put in THE LAST OIL REFINERY in Meterie', La...WOWZA!!!
And yes, that SWEET CRUDE IS THE "MOTHER LODE" of oil...Take out of the ground, put it through a separator stack to take out the impurities and BOOM...refined oil cheaply...
NOTE: NO one KNOW HOW MUCH OIL Texas has but it is a bunch due to West Texas being partially desert...
The earth is like a CSTR, a constantly stirred tank reactor. Whatever the reactants are they keep being stirred and oil is the result.
We're lied to about pretty much everyrhing. But at least people are stsrting to see it. Well, maybe 25% of us.
All that is needed for oil is carbon and hydrogen. Most crude oil also has some other contaminants like sulfur which must be removed in the refining process. Fossils contain all of those elements. I'm not sure where you got this information, but either someone misinformed you or you have oversimplified what they were trying to say.
Why are people Downvoting you with no response? This is true. Oil and all of its derivatives are just that, hydrocarbons. I’d love the source of the “chemists” that have shown this firmly established chemistry is false.
I learned this long ago, but it happens to be in this video as well.
I'm not an expert on the subject, but I think you have understood the statement backwards.
It's not that 'all that is needed is carbon and hydrogen', it's that decaying plant and animal matter contain other elements that are not found in oil.
As a (hypothetical) example, if a certain percentage of decaying animal matter is calcium from bones, why don't we see that same percentage of calcium in the oil? (Or at least, why is there not enough calcium to account for the bones, etc.)
This is answered if you’d like, by the fact that oil IS in fact pretty unique to where it’s coming from due to the variables in what creates it and the reservoir itself. Oil refineries themselves aren’t all uniform, they are unique to their feedstock, even if the principles are the same. Sour oil for instance, is crude oil with very high levels of sulfur, and a refinery that refines a more standard crude would face catastrophic difficulties in refining it. Either way, the hydrocarbon is the only bit that matters, the other trace elements don’t occur in large quantities, and part of the refining process itself implies things like calcium are “processed” out and left for the “bottom of the barrel” which is fuel that giant ships run, and it’s most certainly got all sorts of random components in its general makeup.
I'm not sure if you don't understand the issue, or you are trying to be evasive.
The answer does not lie in 'what was processed out', but what is in the raw crude that comes out of the ground. Is there calcium (for instance) in the crude? And if not, how could it have been made from animal matter?
I’m not sure you understood my reply. I was playing devils advocate for the most part. The entire argument being presented is still operating on the assumption that crude oil is just old dinosaur bones. Or something? I guess I don’t know why anyone would think that the forces and processes involved with how this stuff forms would leave all the calcium from animal bones right there in the mix, unless it’s still a misunderstanding. This stuff was comprised almost entirely of plant life anyways, not things that had bones.
Correct. I'm in the energy business and we get the monthly Oil & Gas magazines.
15+ years ago I remember reading in one of those mags where a couple old capped wells were checked. I only saw it in the mag but one would "think" that a discovery like that would be on the nightly news. We know why it wasn't.
The media would have to spin and say that more dinosaurs had recently perished and fell into the well to change into oil.
Buying up "spent" oil fields could be a decent long term investment
The oil companies do this and get a lot of crap from the shareholders when they do specifically because they believe the myth that oil is finite and comes from decayed plant and animal life. There is no such thing as peak oil.
There is probably a peak amount we can take at one time before all accessible fields drain before they can fill back up. There must be some balance point of extraction versus how quick the earth refills.
Correct, but that changes with the technology too. A lot of wells that were once deemed empty can now be productive with newer technology.
so a lot of people know the "fossil fuel" myth is BS, but it is perpetuated because, why?
Just one more official story from the government that is simply a lie.
Fracking has been made into a taboo and evil word.
However, the process is fairly simple.
When an oil well goes dry, the oil companies make a slurry of liquids and highly spherical silica sand, 95% SiO2. This purity keeps it from breaking down when mixed with gases and oil.
They then send this slurry down the well and blast it into the well. The explosion creates new crevices in the rock formations and often revitalizes an expired well. Rather than drill more wells, the companies can reactivate old wells and make them produce again.
The natural gas and oil has been produced over the course of hundreds of millions of years, and so has the sand that is used to frack. Many of the high grade pure white silica sands are found in the midwest where 200 to 300 million years ago there were oceans with waves that rolled the silica into the spherical shape.
As we know, an egg shape can withstand great pressure, so too, can spherical sand. The importance of the spherical sand is the ability to hold the newly fracture rock crevices open so oil and gas can leak through. The shape is strong but also provides the gaps necessary for oil and gas to pass through them.
fracking leads to crappy water in the wells that are in close proximity to the fracking areas. i lived it. it ruined our well water. and no one came running to help us.
I am certainly against any efforts that ruin clean drinking water or create other environmental hazards. Surface strip mining for lithium and rare earth materials is something to watch closely as well. (which by the way, China owns the vast majority of rare earth mines in the world, including US mines)
It's my understanding that fracking takes place 1 to 2 miles below the surface, well beyond a typical water well for drinking.
Not disagreeing with you and I would feel the exact same way if my water was tainted by contaminants.
Wells that are fracked are existing wells that have already run dry and are reactivated by the process.
See my reply above...that is ABSOLUTELY CORRECT...once the fissures are broken, the slime and oil mix can cock up a real nice water well...that is why it is USED ONLY in certain circumstances...
This is one of the concerns I've had. I believe there can be good applications of fracking but I hear a lot of negative side effects from the practice being done in close proximity to the fracking zones. I'm guessing it needs to be done far enough away from populated areas, but I'm also guessing that the contamination can spread quite far. Not sure what the solution would be since I'm not an expert on the topic.
I'm pro-gas but admittedly have fallen victim to some of the fracking propaganda with water table fouling and strange emissions coming out of the faucets of residents living within nearby fracking zones. What is the truth of this? I want to be pro-fracking because it's another energy solution, but need some of my concerns alleviated.
There probably needs to be some limit on depth (or minimum depth) of fracking to prevent water tables from being fouled. Or possibly distance to populated areas, or both. The oil companies are going to swear it is fine and doesn't affect water but there is too much evidence out there that it does.
I was conducting a safety and environmental audit on an international drilling company headquartered in Houston, TX. While interviewing a drilling engineer and geologist I asked them that very same question. They replied that yes that a previously dry oil reservoir, after a period of time, will fill back up with oil. I also have a friend who is a petroleum chemist who said the same thing. Rockefeller and his Standard Oil Company wanted to push the idea of scarcity.
It was all the rage at the time, like diamonds and DeBeers.
I've said since middle school that there weren't enough dinosaurs ever to produce as much oil as there is, and that was a long long time and millions of barrels ago.
Same here. A term like "fossil fuels" shows how manipulative the language can be.
That’s because “fossil fuels” is a misnomer. My understanding is that it’s pretty similar to coal, just different compositions subjected to different conditions(temperature, time). The very foundations of these can be seen at any time by visiting a peat bog. TLDR not dinosaurs, just giant ancient forests. My source is a 40 year higher up engineer in the industry(oil platforms,derricks, and fields) for what it’s worth. 🤷♂️
Who was saying that they were dinosaur bones?
Its not dinosaurs that produce oil. Most oil fields were likely large swamps in depository basins or on continental margins or maybe very shallow anoxic coastal waters under certain conditions. Go to somewhere like this today and you have enormous amounts of decaying organic matter that settles in them. Then for whatever reason these swamps had their organic matter "capped" by other erosion deposits that form an impermeable barrier protecting them from the atmosphere. These in turn are buried under sedimentary deposits and the heat and pressure deeper in the earths crust forms oil. Today we can mimic this process industrially through various means whether its using natural gas as a feed stock, you can use coal or even in theory decaying organic matter. The thing is though for widespread application it cannot compete with the natural deposits we have.
Because of our oxygen atmosphere and high UV exposure from the sun it makes hydrocarbons unstable in our atmosphere there are only certain geological conditions where this process can happen.
This is where it gets dicey on both sides of the aisle. By that I mean both republicans and democrats are right while both are also wrong. The illusion of choice is strong here. Republicans are right with say things like drill, drill, drill in the current situation we are in and democrats are also right in saying we are destroying our eco systems but they think lithium batteries are the answer and windmills, solar panels etc but it does more harm than good and a money laundering scheme, not to mention the throusands of years it takes to biodegrade even nuclear energy. When in reality all of it should be eliminated and we should be demanding for free energy (think Tesla towers, energy propulsion etc). Think of like never having to "charge" your phone again. All this stuff is out there and suppressed along with the 5,800 + energy related patents that are confiscated for muh "national security".
Do you know if anyone figured out how Tesla was going to make Wardenclyffe Tower work? I recently watched the Tesla files and was curious. I haven’t been able to find anything on the web that would suggest that it had been figured out. I know Tesla coils work, but that tower was a whole other level.
Sort of. From my understanding nobody has a working model of his technology (or similar technologies), but we do understand at least the basics of how they work. Some names to start your research are Eric Dollard, John Keely, Dewey Larson, John Bedini, Walter Russell, Tom Bearden, Ken Wheeler, and there's more, that's off the top of my head.
Each of them have slightly different theories as to how the universe works, but there's great similarities between how all of them think. The core principles seem to be...
-The Universe seems to be an interplay of two opposing forces, Gravitation and Radiation (One inward/concentrative force and another outward/expanding force)
-Aether Theory > Atomic Theory (All space is filled with an Aether, and matter is just the motion or "flow" of that Aether. Take empty space which is the base state of the Aether and induce motion in the form of a toroidal vortex waveform and concentrate it, and you get matter. Light, Sound, gravitational waves, etc are just certain motions/flow states or "waves" in the Aether)
-Electricity is 4-dimensional rather than 2-dimensional (Flows through space and counter-space, also involves dielectricity and magnetism. Modern electrical theory doesn't recognize all of the dimensions, only some of them. Using all of the dimensions of electricity should allow for all this "space age technology" we hear about, faster than light travel, electricity transmission over distance instantly without losses, zero point energy, etc)
-Figuring out how Electricity works would also allow for healing technology, and other "dangerous" technologies. As matter is simply a "flow structure" of the Aether, and electricity is also a movement or waveform of the Aether, applying Electricity in the proper way should be able to form, change, or dissolve matter at will. Could be used for the good, or for evil. This may be part of why this technology was hidden in the first place. That kind of power in the wrong hands could be planet/civilization destroying, and would make nukes look like firecrackers
-Resonance/Harmonics plays a big part into it I think. Think of how pushing a kid on a swing requires a very small amount of energy to cause a lot of movement if you push the kid at exactly the right time, in comparison to random pushes with random amounts of force. Applying power in a specific resonant way could allow the extraction of energy that's hundreds (thousands) of times the amount of energy that's put in. Tesla mentions 3s, 6s, and 9s to be extra important for some reason. Maybe experiment with feeding a coil the 3rd, 6th, and 9th harmonic of the calculated resonant frequency of the coil? Tesla did a lot of work with impulses, so make sure these are impulses being fed in?
Idk, being completely honest I don't really know entirely what I'm talking about, I've just tried reading as much as I possibly can from Tesla, and anyone who's trying to do anything remotely related to what he was doing. I feel like if we crowdsourced research and had a whole bunch of people a lot smarter than me work together, we might get somewhere on this. Maybe we should create an "electricity.win" or something, and have as many people as possible start reading these papers and books, start bouncing ideas off of each other. I bet within a year we could crack the secret. Plus doing this sort of research takes a lot of equipment. Some of us know a lot of the theory of tesla tech but don't have equipment to test it, others have rooms full of equipment but have no idea where to begin.
This got kinda long and messy, but anyone with me? I'm being serious here that I think this can be done.
I would join your electricity.win board. Free electricity for all would end the reason for a whole lot of wars.
Yes, Tesla did. Read the patents. Read the books. Look for online forums. There are people out there who have recreated Teslas work and are currently working on that type of technology. Eric Dollard is a interesting guy.
Thank you
If you haven't read any books on N. Tesla I highly recommend that you do. I couldn't put the books down after I started reading....
Thank you
Why the hell aren't we mining the miles and miles of methane ice from our coastal areas?
Cause that’s not green energy 🤪
You say Dems are right that we are destroying our ecosystem but that’s not true either. There’s nothing we are doing to destroy anything. More carbon means more plants growth. God made our world perfect and able to withstand the minuscule impact of man.
While I understand your view. We are destroying it somewhat. Look at plastic. Remember they want us divided.
Correct. The whole fossil fuels thing is scam right along with climate change.
Fossil Fuels is FF or 66
Climate Change is CC or 33
The alliteration is definitely their doing.
Abiotic oil theory. It’s what the scientists in Russia hold to.
Not just Russia, the big oil companies here in the US have known about the process for decades.
illegal immigrant dinosaurs?
Because some dinosaurs could fly -- silly.
Pterodactyls have entered the chat.
I identify as a pterodophile. 😁🤣
This is the link to Dr. Soon’s website. https://www.ceres-science.com/
I was hoping they would bring up the reason and source of the lie (Rockefeller)
DecodingSymbols just BTFO'd "Dinosaurs". They just fake ass creations for comms.
link please.
Not OP but here it is.
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2023/12/15/dinosaurs/
Thanks
Willie Soon's legit, been following for many years.
Here's a nice debunk on the global warming hoax.
https://youtu.be/_Ma4aSFlF_Q?feature=shared
I believe they're called "fossil fuels" because they found in the fossil layer, and are created from organic deposits.
I don't think it means you HAVE to get them that way. There are other methods.
I love this guy! This guy has so much passion and character. He is a pleasure to listen to and watch. I found his personality to be just as enthralling as the data he was sharing. SOMEBODY, Tucker, anyone, I know he won’t do it because he clearly happy in what he is doing but someone should try to poach this guy for a hard hitting redpill science show.
“Fossil fuels” are made up of certain molecules that fossils happen to turn into. There’s no reason those molecules could also naturally occur elsewhere without fossils being present. They would be the same as fossil fuels, but they just didn’t come from fossils.
Essentially fossil fuels exist because decaying organic matter concentrated the building blocks necessary to build long chain hydrocarbons. Many processes on Earth have a biological origin. The only reason our atmosphere has an oxygen content is that organisms developed the means to photosynthesise about 2 billion years ago - they displaced the original organisms which dominated the earth most of which survive today underground or in "extreme" environments. The only reason we have coal and why most of it dates to about 300 million years ago is that plants colonised land, learned a lot of new tricks to better cope with it and earth become dominated by large humid swampy forests for tens of millions of years. Trees are basically made of cellulose and it took tens of millions of years for other organisms to develop the means to break them down. You look at a log in the forest today that is dead and look at all the critters eating it. Coal deposits don't really form anymore.
With the amount of fake information out there, it's really tough to know that for sure. We're walking blind out here until the Government and Multinational's release the real History that belongs to us.
I might not be the smartest person, hell, I believe the moon was placed into orbit by some intelligent race. But it's not that far a stretch from there to believe that Fossil Fuels are not decaying organic matter.
The Deep Hot Biosphere: The Myth of Fossil Fuels. by Thomas Gold
Ergo, Dinosaurs did have a space program.
didnt watch vid but on topic of energy, I'm kind of against or a little for both sides here
use "fossil" fuels while we have them (whatever they are) but also reduce harmful air emissions if you can (filters?)
renewables exist like biogas, wood, etc. and make use of those too
be prepared for the possibility of running out of "non-renewable" energy sources and to be able to rely more on renewables
personally not a nuke fan
This is great, thanks for posting!
Let's be clear. Given the proper precursors, carbon and hydrogen, and sufficient pressure and time, oil and natural gas can be made in theory. The precursors can come from biological sources like fossils, OR they can come from other carbon and hydrogen deposits that just so happen to exist on the planet. It's not a conspiracy. This is actually taught in school.
However, NOTHING creates oil at the rate we are using it...approximately 100 Million barrels per day. If this were done in any form, the earth would have been doing so even before we started using it. For millions and millions of years. There would be a Pacific Ocean size puddle of oil somewhere.
There isn't, so there are 3 possibilities.
Abiotic oil simply doesn't exist.
As Dr. Soon says in that video, large amounts of abiotic oil MAY exist way down in the mantle, but we obviously don't yet have technology to reach it. So if it exists, it's not usable today as an energy source.
Abiotic oil may exist and be accessible in the crust, BUT if this is true, the creation rate must be very, very slow. Not significantly faster than the replacement rate from fossil precursors.
This is not some big secret. The other thing that Dr. Soon says which is also true, is that much of the oil in the ground today is left stranded. Oil doesn't exist in a puddle. It is trapped in rocks. You can force water into the rocks to try and push it out, but you can never get 100% of it. There is room for enhanced recovery techniques at a more expensive price point.
Do keep in mind though, that at some point, when you have expended as much energy to extract and pump a barrel of oil as you get from that barrel of oil, oil is no longer usable as a fuel source, even though it may still exist in the ground. Yes, the globalists have blown this way out of proportion, but it doesn't mean that there are no physical limits at all. We need to be smart about how we use the resources God has given us.
"There would be a Pacific Ocean size puddle of oil somewhere."
Who says there isn't? Dr. Soon points out that we barely scratch the surface with our drilling tech. There might be an enormous reservoir we just cannot access it with current tech.
The most abundant element in the universe is hydrogen. Our most abundant resource on earth is water, H20. Two parts Hydrogen, one part oxygen.
Using hydrogen as a fuel source would basically be limitless.
Splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen would create fuel and air to breathe. Seems pretty simple.
If there is any technology that is most certainly being hidden from society it is using water for fuel. It's being hidden because it is cheap, free, and abundant. There is no way to make money from such a massive resource. But there it is.
This is all just my personal opinion.
The problem is thermodynamics get in the way here. You have to put energy in to split the hydrogen out. Hydrogen is incredibly difficult to work with. Its highly explosive, difficult to compress and bottle and leaks out of anything your store it in. Hydrogen isn't a fuel source, you can use it as a carrier of energy but you get SIGNIFICANT losses in the process.
Free hydrogen would be a very valuable resource but its not available on our planet because of our oxygen rich atmosphere. Oddly enough in the outer solar system worlds like Titan which in many ways is probably similar to Earth 4 billion years ago have plenty of it but no free Oxygen. On Titan the hydro-logical cycle is based on liquid hydrocarbons like Methane because its so cold and water ice is like silicate rocks in the inner solar system.
That is the point of the video.
It’s all established science with answers known to the industry. It’s interesting that ideas and thoughts which oil companies have a vested interest in making the public hate, are so vehemently hated here. These companies do what’s profitable, just because an old well has a little pressure after potentially decades means very little, they would need to be gushing oil again and be completely full to make the capital needed worth it. High producing oil fields can operate at some eye watering pressures for the giant deep ones (10-15,000 psi).
The earth is a giant chemistry lab. Heat, pressures and the elements of earth make all this stuff.
HA! I've been saying this for a decade. Nice Tucker!
There are hydrocarbons in a coherent state in our microtubules, they house our memories.
Source: The theory of Orch-OR by Penrose and Hameroff, probably the most falsifiably tested theory there is.