Great clip. Brings to mind the phrase 'The Dog that barks the loudest' ....
Sounds like Tucker is covering his tracks? Just like Roger Stone did when he turned on Trump. Seems like borderline panic to me lol.
Why is he talking about lying at the end? Never seen the man look so 'unconfident'
Why is this interviewer not asking for more into this? Great question originally though. I'm surprised he put him on the spot like this. I am surprised Tucker didnt read question beforehand.
His explanation is "uhh well it was true at the time.. but you know times weird right? ... anyway, I was hearing him talk about Election Fraud and I BELIEVED HIM THEN TOO but uhh.. well i.. uhh. .. couldnt reach anybody, so I was angry"
What? You couldnt reach somebody so you said you PASSIONATELY hate Trump and that you said it 'honestly' ?!?!
Such a weird thing to cover up. Sounds like there is more here to me, but I see everybody else thinks this was a good look for Tucker lol so maybe im the weird one.
PS Do you have the link to 'the story' when it broke? This is the first I've heard of this 'text message' from Tucker
One can assume Tucker isn't involved in the plan directly, and so following along those lines it could make sense that Tucker was exceedingly displeased with what Trump didn't finish or something that Trump did.
It's an emotion that is echoed more than anyone wants to really admit.
He could also have been afraid of being canceled; after all, he was clearly suppressed several times at Fox before they fired him.
Perhaps he was fired, and his mind ultimately changed, because of his firing and Joe's thorough destruction of just about everything the country is and stands for.
People are quick to praise Tucker, this is true.
People are also too quick to throw him under the bus, and after reading endless "Cucker Carlson" from Anaconda it got more than a little old to see.
He is either in on it or not? How long has he been on TV? 15 years? Hes in on it by now lol. He went through OBAMA Years and never got replaced or wacked? Hes 100% in on it
The "plan" has been forming for decades, it really picked up steam after they whacked JFK. IMO there is absolutely NO WAY that ANY journalist would be "in on it", not one chance in hell.
Easy cowboy. "In on it" doesnt mean tucker had any involvement in the assasination of JFK. Nor am I implying he was given the 100% fact of the matter. Although if he did know the truth I wouldnt be surprised.
Great! Me neither. Doesn't mean there aren't people who are sore and emotional in a time where the country is going to shit and hoped that Trump would've been able to prevent it.
If its echoed commonly then there are too many people who are brainless.
Two things: First, those unwilling to ever ask questions are the brainless ones. It is stupidity to blindly accept what you're fed, and that is exactly what part of the great awakening is about.
Second: That's the funny thing about emotion. It does not always follow logic, and no matter how intelligent you are, everyone succumbs to emotion sometimes -- including you, as it is across your post history the same as anyone else's.
That's life.
You got duped and were an idiot.
I didn't get duped, but anyone willing to instantly attack OR praise Tucker without any thought behind it is.
Yeah, thats why I love this clip. Its one of those honest conversations without filters to make yourself look good. Most of us are scared to ackowledge our mistakes even in conversation amongst our loved ones and try to embelish the situation in our favour. This is refreshing.
He may have hated Trump at that very moment because he was turned into a liar.
But the blame lies with the campaign...
I guess we'll never know for sure.
Looking at it more deeply, Devolution/COG kind of operation is very hard to pull off, especially while maintaining the required level of secrecy. Trump being surrounded by incompetents was very necessary - otherwise the Fraud would have been prematurely blown open and the entire Devolution would have failed.
But it looks terrible for smart people around him. Its not just Tucker, even Patrick Byrne was lamenting about this. And the fact that Tucker hated Trump in the moment just shows how passionate Tucker was about the obvious election fraud, that he could not properly cover.
He was absolutely honest though. He did cover it. He did get tons of flak. Ultimately they kicked him off Fox because he wouldnt stop covering the fraud.
Trump had to take a lot of bullets. Even people like Tucker have to as well.
Whether Tucker was ever a CIA agent, in this clip he comes across as very genuinee.
Just as you say here, it was necessary for the plan that the definitive proof of election rigging be held back for a long time. Tucker didn't know that.
Yep, and I actually feel for people who are closer to the plan but not fully privvy to it. I can only imagine how frustrating it must be watching things go in slow motion. I think thats what got Lin Wood as well.
When you look at the interview with Putin, or his interview in Dubai, it becomes clear, Tucker is very emo-driven in the moment.
We often forget how emo-driven we ourselves are, and respond in ways we should not.
I men, who can honestly say, they have never made an exception to a rule one tries to live by? And it is always the same. You break your own rule, you get in trouble.
So, there we go.
added
According to Human Design, he is a generator with emotional authority, of the hermit/opportunist kind with a split definition.
So, on the one had he has to wait till his emotional wave has cleared before making decisions, but on the other: his channel 25/51 leads him to use dramatic or shocking words and events to be in the experience. and the 30/41: under pressure to experience emotion.
On the one hand, he needs time alone to ground himself and really cognize his next step, on the other, he will recognize his next step when it is time.
So, he' s got a lot on his plate.
On top the cross he bears is the right angle cross of contagion. This cross is made by the channel of truth and the channel of creativity. He is here to connect peoples, and spread ideas so, each can find the truth in him- or herself.
Wow, then a talk show host is quite the position.
From that perspective, He is at the right place for him, acting out his not-self in a lot of ways by using his authority the wrong way. But he is learning.
side note
I am time and again amazed at how fine grained and correct the insight into the mechanics of an individual this system offers is.
I think when Putin asked him about being a CIA wannabe, I think he was pretty clear. In other words, I know who you are. I don't think there are CIA wannabe's.
This verb has nearly lost its meaning thanks to the spectacularly untrustworthy who betrayed our trust - doctors, scientists, journalists, public officials, police, teachers, principals, judges, adoption agencies, orphanages, priests, bishops, the pope...no more trust for you
The intentional, methodical destruction of humanity is nearly complete. Wheeee
Not much of an investigative journalist, more like a CIA propagandists used to being handed talking points. His explanation comes down to insulting the Trump campaign. Like Comey, he tries too hard to convince the public he is a good person who takes his job seriously.
Total ADHD tangent... the green screen snow flakes look massive to me and highly distracting and the scenery is such a weird choice in my opinion. Carry on.
This is a reasonable explanation imo I’ve done similar in frustration myself how any would be comfortable with their significant others seeing all their texts to their friends
Keep all these people at arms length. Dont invest emotionally into any one of them. Trump is the only one I trust in this.
Anyway, Tucker says a lot of good things that awakens the normies and I cant get my head around a reality where someone dropping Truth bombs all the time is working for the death cult.
I read a article few months ago claiming Tucker is controlled opposition. I will try to locate it. The premise is, Tucker covers every story superficially. He may cover the hard hitting stories but never digs deeper than needed, never goes up the ladder to expose where the evil stems from.
Fox fired Tucker, what impression does that paint with the general public? One would think, the Fox and Tucker split must mean they were sitting on opposite sides of the fence. You would think that Tucker leaving Fox would give him the freedom to expand on many of the Q topics like globalism, or crimes against humanity.. He has not.
When Tucker interviewed Putin, did he question Putin about the biolabs in Ukraine or the hundreds of billions laundered through Ukraine? Did Tucker ask about Putin's struggle with the international banking industry, Putin's effort to eliminate them from Russia?
If Putin is joining forces to create BRICS to compete with the petro dollar, he is in direct conflict with Rothchild control of the planet monetary system. I'm sure Putin knows about the Israeli / Rothchild connection, bribing our politicians with Mossad honeypot Epstein Island scenario and control of our media. Was this discussed? What did we get? Lesson on Russian history?
The Fox /Tucker split made the MAGA supporters think Tucker was fired for covering topics that benefit the Trump administration, but in reality we are still getting a 40,000 foot view. Tucker is not digging deep enough to show the evil complex behind the curtain.
Edit: Here is the article I referred to. It was posted Feb 11th. Why did it seem like I read it a few months ago? I think there is so much information coming in, it distorts the perception of time.
The fact that there are many who aren’t open to those possibilities (controlled opp) is puzzling.
I pretty much wrote him off as controlled when he ‘lost’ a copy of hunter’s hard drive ‘in the mail’. Does anyone even remember that fiasco??
Still like what he is doing - but remain skeptical due to his apparent inability to dig. He seems to scratch the surface on things, come to a conclusion and convince rather than dig and vet out any deeper information and facts.
Good grief. Tucker isn't digging deep enough? Tucker very clearly is only going to report on something that he can vet, and 100% confirm. Tucker has always been the voice of reason, he clearly shows the ability to adapt to new information as long as the information is 100% factual, and can be proven. You expect him to go ranting about "Evil" and such things that CANNOT be proven.
To me it sounds like this article you read is the opposition trying to discredit Tucker.
Don't get me wrong, I like Tucker, I'm just saying the possibility exists and we have to be aware of the concensus coming in from every direction.
I realize covering some stories, digging to deep could be risky, perhaps get you killed. Tucker's heart might be in the right place, but he knows not to wade into deep water.
What I talked about above is just info to keep in the back of your mind, helps people see the truth if and when it exposes itself.
Thanks for the link I always appreciate a different perspective, I don't agree with a lot of what this writer says. I do agree that it's worth scrutinizing Tucker for things he's said in the past but people change. I believe since the Covid sham, and election scam that Tuckers perspective has drastically changed. Tucker used to hate on Alex Jones, and used to mock him incessantly, but now seems open to a lot of what Alex says which is wild even giving him an interview.
What this writer says about Tucker ignoring elites just to make fun of liberals, and play off the republican vs democrat dichotomy is just silly. Tucker being the most watched primetime TV host it's his job to get ratings, and do the show that his producers/boss at Fox want him to do, that doesn't make Tucker a deceptive spook does it? It makes him a good TV show host. Making fun of the liberal sherpa every night gets ratings, ranting about shadowy elites that are controlling everything without ironclad proof would send his show into a death spiral.
The writer of this article Alan MacLeod makes some good points about Tucker that I will take into consideration from now on, but I don't agree with his overall sentiment about Tucker.
The best way to get normies to watch Tucker is to hear Tucker hates Donald Trump. Anyone in our realm is already going to do it. This whole thing is a work. Just like Joe Rogan running around claiming he's a classic liberal and isn't really a fan of Trump but has been a UFC (which Trump helped start) commentator his whole life subtly red-pilling on his podcast which is #1 in the country. You are watching a WWE psyop but have the blessing to know you're a smart mark in this event.
I don’t think his comments make Trump look all that great?! Why didn’t they send Tucker the goods on the stolen election when they were trying to help him?
I was surprised to hear his dad was CIA, so he grew up around it. Personally, I think in all his ramblings prior to leaving FOX, he woke up. After so many years of bashing, he began to connect the dots and that set him apart from everyone else at FOX. Part of me is still on the fence about him, like so many others. Hopefully in the end, we find out that many people we trusted are good.
My past posts I noted that I’m not a fan of Tucker, I always question who “made him” and why is he the leader of the people via podcasts. I’m very leery of him.
Conclusion: The word “HATE” is a very strong word, it carries a lot of internal and external energy to one that is mention too or subject. I avoid the word. I do dislike Biden, Clinton’s and fake Obama’s but the title of “HATE” towards them from me does not exist
HATE:
to dislike intensely or passionately; feel extreme aversion for or extreme hostility toward; detest: to hate the enemy;to hate bigotry. to be unwilling; dislike: I hate to do it.
Trump and his family I trust. Everybody else I trust about as much as a fart after a Taco Bell Tuesday night. Trump is pretty smart and he will play people he knows are really against him as long as they are useful. We will see in the end who is still standing. Until then, remember Taco Bell warning.
He does seem a little panicked having to explain that. Says a lot but I try not to read too much into things like this. At the time he probably DID hate Trump, but one thing I do believe about Tucker is that his opinion will change when presented with new information.
Too much detail is usually indicative of lying. This was not a good answer. What's wrong with "the campaign fed me bad information, I aired it. Looked like a fool and I was pissed."
Seems a reasonable explanation - he was trying to help Trump by exposing the truth, and the campaign pooped the bed and tried to make Tucker lie in it.
You said nice things about me earlier. I'm starting to have questions."
I like Tucker even more now!
ditto. That was legit. He was angry at the moment.
BTW I wanted to upvote but you were already 17
I'd be pissed off, too. People wanted to see proof. But hey, it had to be THIS way.
Great clip. Brings to mind the phrase 'The Dog that barks the loudest' ....
Sounds like Tucker is covering his tracks? Just like Roger Stone did when he turned on Trump. Seems like borderline panic to me lol.
Why is he talking about lying at the end? Never seen the man look so 'unconfident'
Why is this interviewer not asking for more into this? Great question originally though. I'm surprised he put him on the spot like this. I am surprised Tucker didnt read question beforehand.
His explanation is "uhh well it was true at the time.. but you know times weird right? ... anyway, I was hearing him talk about Election Fraud and I BELIEVED HIM THEN TOO but uhh.. well i.. uhh. .. couldnt reach anybody, so I was angry"
What? You couldnt reach somebody so you said you PASSIONATELY hate Trump and that you said it 'honestly' ?!?!
Such a weird thing to cover up. Sounds like there is more here to me, but I see everybody else thinks this was a good look for Tucker lol so maybe im the weird one.
PS Do you have the link to 'the story' when it broke? This is the first I've heard of this 'text message' from Tucker
One can assume Tucker isn't involved in the plan directly, and so following along those lines it could make sense that Tucker was exceedingly displeased with what Trump didn't finish or something that Trump did.
It's an emotion that is echoed more than anyone wants to really admit.
He could also have been afraid of being canceled; after all, he was clearly suppressed several times at Fox before they fired him.
Perhaps he was fired, and his mind ultimately changed, because of his firing and Joe's thorough destruction of just about everything the country is and stands for.
People are quick to praise Tucker, this is true.
People are also too quick to throw him under the bus, and after reading endless "Cucker Carlson" from Anaconda it got more than a little old to see.
Assume he isnt in on it? Are you kidding me? LOL
He is either in on it or not? How long has he been on TV? 15 years? Hes in on it by now lol. He went through OBAMA Years and never got replaced or wacked? Hes 100% in on it
Putin even told us he is CIA.
Putin said TC wanted to be and thank goodness they didn’t let him in.
Or at least, was
No, Putin said he tried to join but was rejected.
Doesn't everyone in the media have to be?
The "plan" has been forming for decades, it really picked up steam after they whacked JFK. IMO there is absolutely NO WAY that ANY journalist would be "in on it", not one chance in hell.
Easy cowboy. "In on it" doesnt mean tucker had any involvement in the assasination of JFK. Nor am I implying he was given the 100% fact of the matter. Although if he did know the truth I wouldnt be surprised.
Tucker was born in 1969. JFK shot in 1963. Do the math
He went around a multitude of different jobs in the industry at multiple different organizations.
Just because you are in the media does not mean you are in on Q's plan, and it baffles me that you'd even infer that.
Hes not apart of Q's plan. He is 2.0 tucker. I think Tucker Carlson is a traitor to his country, but thats just me maybe.
Stellar comment. Smash Updoot
Never once hated trump for anything. If its echoed commonly then there are too many people who are brainless.
You got duped and were an idiot. Do your pennance and admit you screwed up.
Great! Me neither. Doesn't mean there aren't people who are sore and emotional in a time where the country is going to shit and hoped that Trump would've been able to prevent it.
Two things: First, those unwilling to ever ask questions are the brainless ones. It is stupidity to blindly accept what you're fed, and that is exactly what part of the great awakening is about.
Second: That's the funny thing about emotion. It does not always follow logic, and no matter how intelligent you are, everyone succumbs to emotion sometimes -- including you, as it is across your post history the same as anyone else's.
That's life.
I didn't get duped, but anyone willing to instantly attack OR praise Tucker without any thought behind it is.
He does take responsibility for not verifying it
Yeah, thats why I love this clip. Its one of those honest conversations without filters to make yourself look good. Most of us are scared to ackowledge our mistakes even in conversation amongst our loved ones and try to embelish the situation in our favour. This is refreshing.
I dont see any trace of panic in this. A bit of sadness but no panic.
He may have hated Trump at that very moment because he was turned into a liar. But the blame lies with the campaign... I guess we'll never know for sure.
Looking at it more deeply, Devolution/COG kind of operation is very hard to pull off, especially while maintaining the required level of secrecy. Trump being surrounded by incompetents was very necessary - otherwise the Fraud would have been prematurely blown open and the entire Devolution would have failed.
But it looks terrible for smart people around him. Its not just Tucker, even Patrick Byrne was lamenting about this. And the fact that Tucker hated Trump in the moment just shows how passionate Tucker was about the obvious election fraud, that he could not properly cover.
He was absolutely honest though. He did cover it. He did get tons of flak. Ultimately they kicked him off Fox because he wouldnt stop covering the fraud.
Trump had to take a lot of bullets. Even people like Tucker have to as well.
Whether Tucker was ever a CIA agent, in this clip he comes across as very genuinee.
Just as you say here, it was necessary for the plan that the definitive proof of election rigging be held back for a long time. Tucker didn't know that.
Yep, and I actually feel for people who are closer to the plan but not fully privvy to it. I can only imagine how frustrating it must be watching things go in slow motion. I think thats what got Lin Wood as well.
When you look at the interview with Putin, or his interview in Dubai, it becomes clear, Tucker is very emo-driven in the moment.
We often forget how emo-driven we ourselves are, and respond in ways we should not.
I men, who can honestly say, they have never made an exception to a rule one tries to live by? And it is always the same. You break your own rule, you get in trouble.
So, there we go.
added
According to Human Design, he is a generator with emotional authority, of the hermit/opportunist kind with a split definition.
So, on the one had he has to wait till his emotional wave has cleared before making decisions, but on the other: his channel 25/51 leads him to use dramatic or shocking words and events to be in the experience. and the 30/41: under pressure to experience emotion.
On the one hand, he needs time alone to ground himself and really cognize his next step, on the other, he will recognize his next step when it is time.
So, he' s got a lot on his plate.
On top the cross he bears is the right angle cross of contagion. This cross is made by the channel of truth and the channel of creativity. He is here to connect peoples, and spread ideas so, each can find the truth in him- or herself.
Wow, then a talk show host is quite the position.
From that perspective, He is at the right place for him, acting out his not-self in a lot of ways by using his authority the wrong way. But he is learning.
side note
I am time and again amazed at how fine grained and correct the insight into the mechanics of an individual this system offers is.
Er heshed vump horped whev in my frinkle kump, and I'm not having it
I read this the way you do.
I think when Putin asked him about being a CIA wannabe, I think he was pretty clear. In other words, I know who you are. I don't think there are CIA wannabe's.
The blame lies with himself. Why wouldn't he verify the info before going on air with it? Isn't that what journalists are supposed to do?
I really dont trust him. He says or does what he needs to.
Well I don't trust them either but right now we need him. Maybe he saw which way things are going and decided to join the winning side?
And maybe, perhaps was offered a deal?
This is Tucker 2.0, original flavor is g(itm)one...
This verb has nearly lost its meaning thanks to the spectacularly untrustworthy who betrayed our trust - doctors, scientists, journalists, public officials, police, teachers, principals, judges, adoption agencies, orphanages, priests, bishops, the pope...no more trust for you
The intentional, methodical destruction of humanity is nearly complete. Wheeee
Not much of an investigative journalist, more like a CIA propagandists used to being handed talking points. His explanation comes down to insulting the Trump campaign. Like Comey, he tries too hard to convince the public he is a good person who takes his job seriously.
Agree - it was a very light hearted mea-culpa of sorts.
It is his job to 100% vet information given to him regardless of the source.
Total ADHD tangent... the green screen snow flakes look massive to me and highly distracting and the scenery is such a weird choice in my opinion. Carry on.
🐸👌
This is a reasonable explanation imo I’ve done similar in frustration myself how any would be comfortable with their significant others seeing all their texts to their friends
That's one thing I don't have to worry about. I have never sent a text message to anyone because I have never owned a cell phone. 🙂
Jessie Ventura is that you?
Id be there with you if running my business didnt demand one.
Keep all these people at arms length. Dont invest emotionally into any one of them. Trump is the only one I trust in this.
Anyway, Tucker says a lot of good things that awakens the normies and I cant get my head around a reality where someone dropping Truth bombs all the time is working for the death cult.
I read a article few months ago claiming Tucker is controlled opposition. I will try to locate it. The premise is, Tucker covers every story superficially. He may cover the hard hitting stories but never digs deeper than needed, never goes up the ladder to expose where the evil stems from.
Fox fired Tucker, what impression does that paint with the general public? One would think, the Fox and Tucker split must mean they were sitting on opposite sides of the fence. You would think that Tucker leaving Fox would give him the freedom to expand on many of the Q topics like globalism, or crimes against humanity.. He has not.
When Tucker interviewed Putin, did he question Putin about the biolabs in Ukraine or the hundreds of billions laundered through Ukraine? Did Tucker ask about Putin's struggle with the international banking industry, Putin's effort to eliminate them from Russia?
If Putin is joining forces to create BRICS to compete with the petro dollar, he is in direct conflict with Rothchild control of the planet monetary system. I'm sure Putin knows about the Israeli / Rothchild connection, bribing our politicians with Mossad honeypot Epstein Island scenario and control of our media. Was this discussed? What did we get? Lesson on Russian history?
The Fox /Tucker split made the MAGA supporters think Tucker was fired for covering topics that benefit the Trump administration, but in reality we are still getting a 40,000 foot view. Tucker is not digging deep enough to show the evil complex behind the curtain.
Edit: Here is the article I referred to. It was posted Feb 11th. Why did it seem like I read it a few months ago? I think there is so much information coming in, it distorts the perception of time.
https://cygnusx1.substack.com/p/the-truth-about-tucker?r=pezuu&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post&triedRedirect=true
Great post - agree 100%
The fact that there are many who aren’t open to those possibilities (controlled opp) is puzzling.
I pretty much wrote him off as controlled when he ‘lost’ a copy of hunter’s hard drive ‘in the mail’. Does anyone even remember that fiasco??
Still like what he is doing - but remain skeptical due to his apparent inability to dig. He seems to scratch the surface on things, come to a conclusion and convince rather than dig and vet out any deeper information and facts.
Good grief. Tucker isn't digging deep enough? Tucker very clearly is only going to report on something that he can vet, and 100% confirm. Tucker has always been the voice of reason, he clearly shows the ability to adapt to new information as long as the information is 100% factual, and can be proven. You expect him to go ranting about "Evil" and such things that CANNOT be proven.
To me it sounds like this article you read is the opposition trying to discredit Tucker.
Don't get me wrong, I like Tucker, I'm just saying the possibility exists and we have to be aware of the concensus coming in from every direction.
I realize covering some stories, digging to deep could be risky, perhaps get you killed. Tucker's heart might be in the right place, but he knows not to wade into deep water.
What I talked about above is just info to keep in the back of your mind, helps people see the truth if and when it exposes itself.
Read this and tell me what you think.
https://www.mintpressnews.com/tucker-carlson-biography-nicaragua-cia/279782/
Thanks for the link I always appreciate a different perspective, I don't agree with a lot of what this writer says. I do agree that it's worth scrutinizing Tucker for things he's said in the past but people change. I believe since the Covid sham, and election scam that Tuckers perspective has drastically changed. Tucker used to hate on Alex Jones, and used to mock him incessantly, but now seems open to a lot of what Alex says which is wild even giving him an interview.
What this writer says about Tucker ignoring elites just to make fun of liberals, and play off the republican vs democrat dichotomy is just silly. Tucker being the most watched primetime TV host it's his job to get ratings, and do the show that his producers/boss at Fox want him to do, that doesn't make Tucker a deceptive spook does it? It makes him a good TV show host. Making fun of the liberal sherpa every night gets ratings, ranting about shadowy elites that are controlling everything without ironclad proof would send his show into a death spiral.
The writer of this article Alan MacLeod makes some good points about Tucker that I will take into consideration from now on, but I don't agree with his overall sentiment about Tucker.
The best way to get normies to watch Tucker is to hear Tucker hates Donald Trump. Anyone in our realm is already going to do it. This whole thing is a work. Just like Joe Rogan running around claiming he's a classic liberal and isn't really a fan of Trump but has been a UFC (which Trump helped start) commentator his whole life subtly red-pilling on his podcast which is #1 in the country. You are watching a WWE psyop but have the blessing to know you're a smart mark in this event.
He is lying. He knew the election was rigged. Do not give me this nonsense.
I don’t think his comments make Trump look all that great?! Why didn’t they send Tucker the goods on the stolen election when they were trying to help him?
I could be wrong, but I believe Tucker has had a true change of heart due to the events of the past few years.
I was surprised to hear his dad was CIA, so he grew up around it. Personally, I think in all his ramblings prior to leaving FOX, he woke up. After so many years of bashing, he began to connect the dots and that set him apart from everyone else at FOX. Part of me is still on the fence about him, like so many others. Hopefully in the end, we find out that many people we trusted are good.
My past posts I noted that I’m not a fan of Tucker, I always question who “made him” and why is he the leader of the people via podcasts. I’m very leery of him. Conclusion: The word “HATE” is a very strong word, it carries a lot of internal and external energy to one that is mention too or subject. I avoid the word. I do dislike Biden, Clinton’s and fake Obama’s but the title of “HATE” towards them from me does not exist
HATE: to dislike intensely or passionately; feel extreme aversion for or extreme hostility toward; detest: to hate the enemy;to hate bigotry. to be unwilling; dislike: I hate to do it.
Trump and his family I trust. Everybody else I trust about as much as a fart after a Taco Bell Tuesday night. Trump is pretty smart and he will play people he knows are really against him as long as they are useful. We will see in the end who is still standing. Until then, remember Taco Bell warning.
He does seem a little panicked having to explain that. Says a lot but I try not to read too much into things like this. At the time he probably DID hate Trump, but one thing I do believe about Tucker is that his opinion will change when presented with new information.
Too much detail is usually indicative of lying. This was not a good answer. What's wrong with "the campaign fed me bad information, I aired it. Looked like a fool and I was pissed."
Who is Tucker talking to in this interview?
Lex Fridman
I never trusted Tucker, especially after he defended the official 9/11 narrative.
“Of the six names, two of them were still alive.” Did he do this for the 9/11 “hijackers”?
No one is 100% trust worthy, but I’d say I’d trust Tucker over a lot of other names thesedays
Tucker is a great vehicle for people to follow going from normie to anon :)
We need a soundbyte of tucker saying "I like balzac"
Kek but seriously great interview. Listened twice.
So 2 of 6 were still alive, meaning 4 out of 6 were dead and voted. Why apologize?
I think someone crooked in Trump's campaign knew it would make him look stupid. He probably didn't research after 3 names and got burned.
Seems a reasonable explanation - he was trying to help Trump by exposing the truth, and the campaign pooped the bed and tried to make Tucker lie in it.
Killer closing line, great editing there
Elon switched sides..,..why not Tucker?
Can’t wait to hear thank u