National Guard is organized into units stationed in each of the 50 states, three territories, and the District of Columbia, and operates under their respective state or territorial governor except in the instance of Washington, D.C., where the National Guard operates under the President of the United States or his designee.... So, although the National Guard belongz to the Gubners, they are administered by the National Guard Bureau, and can be called up in times of conflict or during a natural disaster, ... but bnormally the State Governors are in control.
So, the answer is: that depends on the situation. It is a valid question to ask when the NGs are deployed. Who's running the show? When there are multiple NGs called out, one can also wonder whether a larger National threat is the pattern.
Well I suppose it's better than eejits burning down whole streets of shops, because Saint George tried to hide his stash from the cops, in his stomach.
Beginning to wonder if we’ll have to wait that long. Something feels like it’s escalating — Question is, is it the last desperate attempts to amp up tyranny and the Patriot Act across every city? Or, are we gearing up for a false flag? Or something altogether different?
It's a buildup to something big coming. Whether it be economic collapse, civil war, or a preemptive military strike by the invaders, something big is coming and NG are being activated in the guise of protecting metro workers. One reason I have to believe we will see an economic crisis is that tomorrow 3/11 the FED is allowing a bank lending program to expire (this is the bank loan program that kept the banks from failing during the Silicon Valley Bank collapse. It was an attempt to contain a contagion). An interesting thing to note is the mirror of 3/11 is 11/3 (11.3). With billionaires selling their stocks and leaving the market, they know something is about break. We could finally see the Everything Bubble collapse.
On 3/11/20 the WHO proclaimed C19 a global pandemic.
3/11 is also the halfway point to 9/11, so it has always stuck with me since 2020.
On the flipside, it could be a lot of optics, but nothing escalating beyond that — similar to what many of us assumed would take place following the withdrawal from Afghanistan, Ukraine, Oct 7 in Gaza/Israel.
However, the illegals and even Trump saying it would likely lead to an attack on our soil - coupled with this being an election year, makes me wonder if this time it’ll be quite different.
All we can do is speculate and prepare for the worst. What I do know for certain is something big and world changing will happen this year. Too much at stake for this to be just another election year.
Hmmm, and then there was the March 11 Tsunami from a Magnitude 9 earthquake.
How often do we have a M9 earthquake. What does that even mean? Oh and several M7s also preceded it.
It was later reported that a satellite orbiting at the outer edge of Earth’s atmosphere that day had detected infrasonics (very low-frequency sound waves) from the quake.
That’s what we’ve been predicting will happen since 2020.
But each and every crazy “happening” or threat always ends up fizzling away (which, for me, is proof that the Biden puppet master cabal is not fully in control, if at all).
I could easily see a false flag attack (whether real, or simulated) so that Biden could pull a Dubya “war time” show of strength, and come in with a fixer platform because you don’t want a change in power during these challenging times, yada yada.
Or, as I said elsewhere, are they desperately trying to implement as much freedom-killing measures before what they’re realizing is soon to be their demise - as a last effort to win (win what? I have no earthly idea)
He's setting himself up as a war time POTUS, and a big reason is to cancel the election. Do that and it'll wake up a lot of people. Declare conservatives the enemy and it wakes more people up. At that point he officially becomes EVERYTHING the left screamed Trump would be. That would wake up a lot, and I mean a LOT of people.
Government doesn't have the power / authority to suspend the Constitution and declare marshal law. They act like they do, but that was not a power granted.
Yeah, somethings up. Either Q post 22 or there are credible threats out there we are not yet aware of. Although anything is possible with all the foreign soldiers we have imported over the past 3 years.
There has been a huge number of military aircraft flying over the rupture points of the New Madrid Seismic Zone. It's way overdue. The government has projected the probable death toll to be horrific, and the loss of infrastructure from the Gulf of Mexico to the Saint Laurence Seaway beyond imagination. Look it up. They say there won't be a bridge left standing on the Mississippi River. Not Q related, but something to be aware of.
Dim / demon dems destroy their own cities, will NOT let their own police do what they are supposed to do, and now want our troops to bail them out?!? They do not have the political will to make their own cities safe for their own citizens, but now demand MILITARY FORCE?!?
That is not what they signed up for! MPs may be qualified, but not combat troops or even support troops.
We have civilian police for a reason. We do not want / need military involved in civil law enforcement, what about the Posse Comitatus Act (1878)?
It is like the left WANTS military control that they can order around. Why don't they use their own police forces?? Why destroy their own cities, and then order in military forces under their control?!? The police were already under their control!!
It is clear our Founding Fathers did not believe in Marshal Law. It goes directly against liberty and freedom.
“Why suspend the habeas corpus in insurrections and rebellions? Examine the history of England. See how few of the cases of the suspension of the habeas corpus law have been worthy of that suspension. They have been either real treasons, wherein the parties might as well have been charged at once, or sham plots, where it was shameful they should ever have been suspected. Yet for the few cases wherein the suspension of the habeas corpus has done real good, that operation is now become habitual and the minds of the nation almost prepared to live under its constant suspension.” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President
letter to James Madison, 1788
“But what is tyranny? Or how can a free people be deprived of their liberties? Tyranny is the exercise of some power over a man, which is not warranted by law, or necessary for the public safety. A people can never be deprived of their liberties, while they retain in their own hands, a power sufficient to any other power in the state.” ~ Noah Webster (1758-1843) American patriot and scholar, author of the first dictionary of American English usage (1806) and the author of the 1828 edition of the dictionary that bears his name.
An Examination into the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, 42-43, (1787)
“It is my belief that there are “absolutes” in our Bill of Rights, and that they were put there on purpose by men who knew what the words meant and meant their prohibitions to be "absolutes.” ~ Justice Hugo L. Black (1886-1971) US Supreme Court Justice
“Whereas civil rulers, not having their duty to the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as military forces, which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms.” ~ Tench Coxe (1755-1824) American political economist
Writing as "A Pennsylvanian," in "Remarks On The First Part Of The Amendments To The Federal Constitution,"
in the Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789, p.2 col.1
“The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times, and under all circumstances. No doctrine, involving more pernicious consequences, was ever invented by the wit of man than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the great exigencies of government. Such a doctrine leads directly to anarchy or despotism, but the theory of necessity on which it is based is false; for the government, within the Constitution, has all the powers granted to it, which are necessary to preserve its existence; as has been happily proved by the result of the great effort to throw off its just authority.” ~ Justice David Davis (1815-1886) U.S. Supreme Court Justice 1862-1877
Ex parte Milligan 71 U.S. 2 (1866) DAVIS, J., Opinion of the Court
“The framers of the constitution knew human nature as well as we do. They too had lived in dangerous days; they too knew the suffocating influence of orthodoxy and standardized thought. They weighed the compulsions for restrained speech and thought against the abuses of liberty. They chose liberty.” ~ Justice William O. Douglas (1898-1980), U. S. Supreme Court Justice
Beauharnais v.Illinois, 342 U.S. 250, 287 (1952)
“Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase granted power or remove or diminish the restrictions imposed upon power granted or reserved. The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency. Its grants of power to the federal government and its limitations of the power of the States were determined in the light of emergency, and they are not altered by emergency.” ~ Justice Charles Evans Hughes (1862-1948) Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court
You are incorrect about Military Police. I was a Combat MP, and can tell you that unless there was a drastic change, Military Police are classified as Combat Support. My units mission (109th MP Company) in the 1980's in Germany was to engage the Spetsnaz if we went to war. Peace-time mission was: Protect V-Corps HQ, Protect V-Corps Commander, and Counter-Terrorist Operations. In the Persian Gulf War, we had several missions: Route Reconnaissance, Supply Line Protection, Convoy Protection, EPW Operations, Counter-Terrorist / Counter-Insurgency Operations, Secure Khobar Towers (never got blown up under our protection), Rear Area Security, U.S. Customs, and law and Order, to name a few.
A Combat MP Company had a TO&E very similar to an Cavalry Scout Platoon of the same era, but without the M3 Bradley: MK19's, 50-Cals, M60's, M203's, Unarmored HUMVEE's (Armored Hummer's didn't happen until the mid to late 2000's), etc.
Army MP's have seen plenty of combat in WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Persian Gulf War, Iraq 2003+, and Afghanistan. Again, not all MP Units are Combat Support, there are also Garrison MP's, Physical Security / Nuclear Physical Security "Tower Rat" MP's, Corrections MP's, etc.
The Posse Comitatus Act has never been challenged. Moreover, it is one branch of government imposing limits on another branch, so it's unconstitutional on its face without amending the constitution.
The PCA follows the spirit of the Constitution if not the letter. Ill have to do some digging when I have time but the Framers thought a national police force a bad thing and were dead set against the quartering of troops.
Maybe Ill do a post next weekend. I have a long work week ahead. Its warming up in Michigan (still can be wintery as the inch of snow I woke up to will attest) and homeowners are clamoring for driveways that have been held over due to winter.
As far as I can tell, I'm the only one who posted about the NG situation in NYC a few days ago, but for whatever reason it got zero traction. I fear this is the beginning of a very disturbing trend in these big blue cities where crime has intentionally been allowed to get out of control.
Create the problem--> Wait for the reaction--> Offer the solution.
Isn't there also a Q drop talking about the NG deployed in cities, and working with the Marines? Something along those lines? I don't remember the post number. 🙈
u/#q22
I don’t remember how precisely to link Q posts so they show up.
But post 955 is relevant. And states the Marines will be activated March 17th.
Though the post is from 2018
Edit: Thanks to Mr_A for educating me on how to do posts.
u/#q955
Without spaces, type u / #q 955 ... The u has to be lowercase. Like this:
u/#q955
u/#q995
EDIT: oh wow it worked... I always wondered how to do that. FYI, I did mine with no spaces inbetween
Thank you!
Whenever I click the q links I get page not found
u/#q955
National Guard is organized into units stationed in each of the 50 states, three territories, and the District of Columbia, and operates under their respective state or territorial governor except in the instance of Washington, D.C., where the National Guard operates under the President of the United States or his designee.... So, although the National Guard belongz to the Gubners, they are administered by the National Guard Bureau, and can be called up in times of conflict or during a natural disaster, ... but bnormally the State Governors are in control.
https://www.todaysmilitary.com/ways-to-serve/service-branches/army-national-guard
So, the answer is: that depends on the situation. It is a valid question to ask when the NGs are deployed. Who's running the show? When there are multiple NGs called out, one can also wonder whether a larger National threat is the pattern.
Washington used the military to save the republic during the Whiskey Rebellion. It could also be Lincoln when he used the military against the South.
The Posse Comitatus Act was not signed until 1878. Washington and Lincoln used Federal troops legally.
Yes but Q said which president used the military to save the republic and what occurred exactly.
This is why Lincoln makes sense as well, because civil war occurred and Q has said there would be no civil war.
How did the whiskey rebellion military action save the nation?
We were still a young nation and it threatened to send us into another revolution. Same as the tea tax did with England.
Well I suppose it's better than eejits burning down whole streets of shops, because Saint George tried to hide his stash from the cops, in his stomach.
we were told.
I am proud of his almost 4 year sobriety.
Diversity hire mayors lead to National Guard call outs for public protection.
How many cities by November 5?
Beginning to wonder if we’ll have to wait that long. Something feels like it’s escalating — Question is, is it the last desperate attempts to amp up tyranny and the Patriot Act across every city? Or, are we gearing up for a false flag? Or something altogether different?
It's a buildup to something big coming. Whether it be economic collapse, civil war, or a preemptive military strike by the invaders, something big is coming and NG are being activated in the guise of protecting metro workers. One reason I have to believe we will see an economic crisis is that tomorrow 3/11 the FED is allowing a bank lending program to expire (this is the bank loan program that kept the banks from failing during the Silicon Valley Bank collapse. It was an attempt to contain a contagion). An interesting thing to note is the mirror of 3/11 is 11/3 (11.3). With billionaires selling their stocks and leaving the market, they know something is about break. We could finally see the Everything Bubble collapse.
On 3/11/20 the WHO proclaimed C19 a global pandemic.
3/11 is also the halfway point to 9/11, so it has always stuck with me since 2020.
On the flipside, it could be a lot of optics, but nothing escalating beyond that — similar to what many of us assumed would take place following the withdrawal from Afghanistan, Ukraine, Oct 7 in Gaza/Israel.
However, the illegals and even Trump saying it would likely lead to an attack on our soil - coupled with this being an election year, makes me wonder if this time it’ll be quite different.
All we can do is speculate and prepare for the worst. What I do know for certain is something big and world changing will happen this year. Too much at stake for this to be just another election year.
Hmmm, and then there was the March 11 Tsunami from a Magnitude 9 earthquake.
How often do we have a M9 earthquake. What does that even mean? Oh and several M7s also preceded it.
https://www.britannica.com/event/Japan-earthquake-and-tsunami-of-2011
Japan has arguably not recovered from the damage that was caused.
Ahem. My tinfoil is itching my scalp again.
https://files.catbox.moe/i5jet1.jpeg
I heard the same and a detail that the banks loans have to be repaid within 30 days. So possibly a 30 day window?
And let’s not forget what Powell said last week - there will be bank failures.
🎯
12? see Q3
Do you think Martial Law is about to be called?
Military on the ground is de facto martial law already.
Maybe there's a slow build up to Martial Law without saying so.
We may never know with these Idiots we have in our government.
That’s what we’ve been predicting will happen since 2020.
But each and every crazy “happening” or threat always ends up fizzling away (which, for me, is proof that the Biden puppet master cabal is not fully in control, if at all).
I could easily see a false flag attack (whether real, or simulated) so that Biden could pull a Dubya “war time” show of strength, and come in with a fixer platform because you don’t want a change in power during these challenging times, yada yada.
Or, as I said elsewhere, are they desperately trying to implement as much freedom-killing measures before what they’re realizing is soon to be their demise - as a last effort to win (win what? I have no earthly idea)
He's setting himself up as a war time POTUS, and a big reason is to cancel the election. Do that and it'll wake up a lot of people. Declare conservatives the enemy and it wakes more people up. At that point he officially becomes EVERYTHING the left screamed Trump would be. That would wake up a lot, and I mean a LOT of people.
They want to win and govern over the world and who is left in it.
I think the Insurrection Act was signed on J6 by President Trump and we have been under limited martial law since that day.
Government doesn't have the power / authority to suspend the Constitution and declare marshal law. They act like they do, but that was not a power granted.
Yeah, somethings up. Either Q post 22 or there are credible threats out there we are not yet aware of. Although anything is possible with all the foreign soldiers we have imported over the past 3 years.
There has been a huge number of military aircraft flying over the rupture points of the New Madrid Seismic Zone. It's way overdue. The government has projected the probable death toll to be horrific, and the loss of infrastructure from the Gulf of Mexico to the Saint Laurence Seaway beyond imagination. Look it up. They say there won't be a bridge left standing on the Mississippi River. Not Q related, but something to be aware of.
I wonder what will happen when the first thug is killed by NG troops?
Biden will apologize.
I’ll wager 7 quatloos that those poor bastards are standing guard with no rounds in their magazines.
Inquiring minds want to know...
What the feck is a quatloo??
But I think you might be right
Dim / demon dems destroy their own cities, will NOT let their own police do what they are supposed to do, and now want our troops to bail them out?!? They do not have the political will to make their own cities safe for their own citizens, but now demand MILITARY FORCE?!?
That is not what they signed up for! MPs may be qualified, but not combat troops or even support troops.
We have civilian police for a reason. We do not want / need military involved in civil law enforcement, what about the Posse Comitatus Act (1878)?
It is like the left WANTS military control that they can order around. Why don't they use their own police forces?? Why destroy their own cities, and then order in military forces under their control?!? The police were already under their control!!
Something is very weird here, very off.
OK but they have arrested professional shoplifters only to see them let off the next day.
This all denies civilized logic, the dem demons are intent on destroying civilization.
A video says hezbollah is in calif. And less than an hour from los angeles or somewhere about there.
As I said above, I think the Insurrection Act was signed by Trump on J6 and we have been under limited martial law since that day.
It is clear our Founding Fathers did not believe in Marshal Law. It goes directly against liberty and freedom.
“Why suspend the habeas corpus in insurrections and rebellions? Examine the history of England. See how few of the cases of the suspension of the habeas corpus law have been worthy of that suspension. They have been either real treasons, wherein the parties might as well have been charged at once, or sham plots, where it was shameful they should ever have been suspected. Yet for the few cases wherein the suspension of the habeas corpus has done real good, that operation is now become habitual and the minds of the nation almost prepared to live under its constant suspension.” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President letter to James Madison, 1788
“But what is tyranny? Or how can a free people be deprived of their liberties? Tyranny is the exercise of some power over a man, which is not warranted by law, or necessary for the public safety. A people can never be deprived of their liberties, while they retain in their own hands, a power sufficient to any other power in the state.” ~ Noah Webster (1758-1843) American patriot and scholar, author of the first dictionary of American English usage (1806) and the author of the 1828 edition of the dictionary that bears his name. An Examination into the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, 42-43, (1787)
“It is my belief that there are “absolutes” in our Bill of Rights, and that they were put there on purpose by men who knew what the words meant and meant their prohibitions to be "absolutes.” ~ Justice Hugo L. Black (1886-1971) US Supreme Court Justice
“Whereas civil rulers, not having their duty to the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as military forces, which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms.” ~ Tench Coxe (1755-1824) American political economist Writing as "A Pennsylvanian," in "Remarks On The First Part Of The Amendments To The Federal Constitution," in the Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789, p.2 col.1
“The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times, and under all circumstances. No doctrine, involving more pernicious consequences, was ever invented by the wit of man than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the great exigencies of government. Such a doctrine leads directly to anarchy or despotism, but the theory of necessity on which it is based is false; for the government, within the Constitution, has all the powers granted to it, which are necessary to preserve its existence; as has been happily proved by the result of the great effort to throw off its just authority.” ~ Justice David Davis (1815-1886) U.S. Supreme Court Justice 1862-1877 Ex parte Milligan 71 U.S. 2 (1866) DAVIS, J., Opinion of the Court
“The framers of the constitution knew human nature as well as we do. They too had lived in dangerous days; they too knew the suffocating influence of orthodoxy and standardized thought. They weighed the compulsions for restrained speech and thought against the abuses of liberty. They chose liberty.” ~ Justice William O. Douglas (1898-1980), U. S. Supreme Court Justice Beauharnais v.Illinois, 342 U.S. 250, 287 (1952)
“Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase granted power or remove or diminish the restrictions imposed upon power granted or reserved. The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency. Its grants of power to the federal government and its limitations of the power of the States were determined in the light of emergency, and they are not altered by emergency.” ~ Justice Charles Evans Hughes (1862-1948) Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court
You are incorrect about Military Police. I was a Combat MP, and can tell you that unless there was a drastic change, Military Police are classified as Combat Support. My units mission (109th MP Company) in the 1980's in Germany was to engage the Spetsnaz if we went to war. Peace-time mission was: Protect V-Corps HQ, Protect V-Corps Commander, and Counter-Terrorist Operations. In the Persian Gulf War, we had several missions: Route Reconnaissance, Supply Line Protection, Convoy Protection, EPW Operations, Counter-Terrorist / Counter-Insurgency Operations, Secure Khobar Towers (never got blown up under our protection), Rear Area Security, U.S. Customs, and law and Order, to name a few.
A Combat MP Company had a TO&E very similar to an Cavalry Scout Platoon of the same era, but without the M3 Bradley: MK19's, 50-Cals, M60's, M203's, Unarmored HUMVEE's (Armored Hummer's didn't happen until the mid to late 2000's), etc.
Army MP's have seen plenty of combat in WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Persian Gulf War, Iraq 2003+, and Afghanistan. Again, not all MP Units are Combat Support, there are also Garrison MP's, Physical Security / Nuclear Physical Security "Tower Rat" MP's, Corrections MP's, etc.
Well I remember MPs giving out traffic tickets on bases!
No I do not doubt the contributions of MPs.
The Posse Comitatus Act has never been challenged. Moreover, it is one branch of government imposing limits on another branch, so it's unconstitutional on its face without amending the constitution.
I'm thinking and hoping it's Red4, u/#q4414
PCA doesn’t apply to national guard? I believe it’s only regular military forces. NG commander in chief is governor of the state.
NG can be federalized under certain conditions, I believe.
But what I was saying is that the PCA is an illegal law to begin with, and as such might be ignored by the military as being null and void.
“NG can be federalized under certain conditions, I believe.”
It takes the approval of the governor, but it can be federalized. This just came up when FJB wanted to take over the Texas NG.
Wasn't it done to integrate schools in Alabama against the governor's wishes?
Arkansas too.
The PCA follows the spirit of the Constitution if not the letter. Ill have to do some digging when I have time but the Framers thought a national police force a bad thing and were dead set against the quartering of troops.
Maybe Ill do a post next weekend. I have a long work week ahead. Its warming up in Michigan (still can be wintery as the inch of snow I woke up to will attest) and homeowners are clamoring for driveways that have been held over due to winter.
Military action can be done without quartering.
The philosophy behind it makes sense, but I'm just talking about the law.
Whatever It is, it seems 2024 is the year it has to happen.
Thanks for posting this.
As far as I can tell, I'm the only one who posted about the NG situation in NYC a few days ago, but for whatever reason it got zero traction. I fear this is the beginning of a very disturbing trend in these big blue cities where crime has intentionally been allowed to get out of control.
Create the problem--> Wait for the reaction--> Offer the solution.
Here's the original story in NYC for anyone that's interested: https://greatawakening.win/p/17si0WvMdq/problemreactionsolution--new-yor/c/
Someone else posted today about seeing NG in the L.A. area
https://greatawakening.win/p/17si5ADLgW/national-guard-deployment-to-ca-/
Isn't there also a Q drop talking about the NG deployed in cities, and working with the Marines? Something along those lines? I don't remember the post number. 🙈
User names are getting better and better.
Anticommie.
MAM!, the folks who need to have that conversation, can't and won't and are incapable of truth!
Maybe the NG is needed to fight all the fucking fighting aged single men that stumbled in from Texas border. Oh and election 2024