Not one legal connected person who identified some change in the way they do legal processes?
Not one leftist fact checker slavering to disprove Q-tards?
I actually found only one mention of it, back in 2019 I think, from ABC News, and the reporter actually proposed the ones in DC were from Mueller.
Since that didn't turn out, there hasnt been one mention in the media.
I've seen literally thousands of posts, comments, and tweets and yet not one single human has a rational explanation.
Comments (89)
sorted by:
I've posed this question to otherwise based friends, but Q deniers or naysayers. They go radio silent when I ask the question. Sometimes they will say "the indictments are for us", but at this point, we would have known if they were rounding up conservatives en masse. Also, what happened to Huber's UT organization of 400+ AUSAs?
There needs to be a legitimate crime, I believe, for it to be us. What crime would 500k Trump supporters have been honestly engaged in so much so that we are a flight risk, need that many sealed indictments, and they need to be sat on for years. It is incongruous.
J6, the Hunter Biden laptop, Ashley Biden diary, and Donald Trump prosecutions show that no legitimate crime is needed because they will make one up however ludicrous and flimsy. They choose the prosecutors, judges, and juries and they blackmail/threaten anyone who resists. They also accelerate and publicize the process as part of their intimidation tactics to make an example of their targets, so it is indeed incongruous that they would sit on sealed indictments and keep them secret if we were the targets.
Exactly.
Questioning the 2020 election steal for one.
Started wayyyy before that, but that is a good point.
I agree. Just proffering alternative hypotheses.
That and we’ve already seen that they’re more than happy to just lock us up outright.
No doubt. I’m so glad I listened to my wife on J6 and didn’t go downtown that day. I’d probably be locked up…still.
Have u considered J6 is a white hat psyop, it’s definitely been a red pill for all but the most rabid leftists ?
I have, but I don't think it was.
I knew people who only didn’t go because they couldn’t find anyone to go with, and it was ridiculously obvious that there were gonna be ops there and it wouldn’t be safe acapella.
Blessings to those who went.
I lived in DC most of my life until moving to NC a couple years ago. I had friends that went. Would’ve been easy enough to go, but I knew that if anything happened, my wife would have probably left me, LOL.
From what i've seen they have been removing and/or arresting conservatives en mass,my god just look at how many over the last 7 years.lawyers/preachers/political opponents/social media influencers/election deniers/vax deniers/freedom doctors/removed conservative media outlets and journalists/truckers/protesters/medical workers,am i missing anyone?
Like who?
Tell them to listen to this and give you the tl;dl
https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/episode-47-sealed-indictments-feat-popehat-aka-ken-white/id1428209307?i=1000443957193
Found via a simple search for qanon "sealed indictments". They actually get to the subject around the 33 minute mark (or so it seemed from fast forwarding through)
Edit: FYI u/Meme_war_ii_vet as I realize my post may have been too late for you to see it as well
Didn't Q say the the 470 was the number of people in the IG's office ?
That seems awfully high and double meaning exist.
What seems awfully high? It comes from this Q post.
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/1804534.html#1804985
I wonder if MI has investigators/prosecutors/hangmen ?
Depends if you want to talk reality or not Military intelligence is not involved in prosecutions
Because there is no JAG ? Because foreign infiltrators could not be under Military ?
Why did Lady Lindsey ask Brett Michael Kavanaugh about Military Justice at his confirmation ?
JAG is not military intelligence.
JAG would also absolutely refuse to use the military for some secret roundup of civilians because they understand the Lindsay/Kavanaugh is limited to a tiny, tiny sliver of instances like a John Walker Lindh being captured on a battlefield.
JAGs know the Uniform Code of Mlitary Justice almost never applies to regular civilians who commit crimes
Half of it better be the WHOLE 'Medical' Industry.
Apply the socratic method: For what reason an indicment becomes sealed ? What reasons justify keeping it sealed ? When and how an indicment gets unsealed. What events can make indictments baloon up like they do in those specific districts ?
Research,formulate, then discuss.
K
ekshot
Oh I have used socratric reasoning to arrive just at what you are implying. I did it like 5 years ago when these were first noticed. What blows my mind, since then, is that there hasn't been:
-leaks.
-investigative journalism.
-Psyop misdirections.
-deeper theories about what it means.
-Deeper analysis.
Because people on the list don’t want to find anything that might trigger them unsealing the list?
An indictment can become sealed for various reasons, but typically it occurs to protect ongoing investigations, ensure the safety of witnesses, prevent the destruction of evidence, or maintain the privacy of individuals who may be under investigation but have not yet been charged with a crime. Here's a breakdown:
Reasons for Sealing an Indictment:
Ongoing Investigations: If revealing the indictment could compromise an ongoing investigation by tipping off suspects or allowing them to destroy evidence.
Witness Safety: If there are concerns about the safety of witnesses or informants involved in the case, sealing the indictment can protect their identities.
Preservation of Evidence: To prevent suspects from destroying evidence that could be crucial to the case.
Privacy of Uncharged Individuals: Sometimes, individuals may be under investigation but not yet charged. Sealing the indictment protects their privacy until charges are officially filed.
Justifications for Keeping it Sealed:
Maintain Confidentiality: Keeping the indictment sealed helps to maintain the confidentiality of the investigation and preserve the integrity of the legal process.
Protect the Investigation: Preventing suspects from being aware of the charges against them can prevent them from fleeing or taking other evasive actions.
Ensure Fair Trial: Sealing the indictment can also help to ensure a fair trial by preventing pretrial publicity that could bias potential jurors.
Unsealing an Indictment:
Court Order: Indictments are typically unsealed by court order. This can occur when the reasons for sealing the indictment are no longer applicable, such as when the investigation is complete, the suspect has been arrested, or the safety of witnesses is no longer at risk.
Request from Prosecution or Defense: Either the prosecution or defense may petition the court to unseal the indictment, typically citing reasons such as the need for transparency in the legal process or the right of the accused to know the charges against them.
Statutory Time Limits: In some jurisdictions, there may be statutory time limits on how long an indictment can remain sealed without being presented in court. Once unsealed, the indictment becomes a matter of public record, and the accused is formally notified of the charges against them, initiating the legal process.
Military courts can process sealed indictments. Military courts function similarly to civilian courts in many respects, including the handling of sealed indictments. However, the specific procedures for handling sealed indictments in military courts may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the rules established by the military justice system in that country.
In the United States, for example, military courts operate under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). The UCMJ provides provisions for the handling of sealed indictments, just as civilian courts do. Sealed indictments in military courts may serve similar purposes as in civilian courts, such as protecting ongoing investigations, preserving evidence, or ensuring the safety of witnesses.
While military courts may have their own specific procedures and regulations governing the handling of sealed indictments, they generally follow principles similar to those in civilian courts. This includes considerations for when and how an indictment may be unsealed, typically through court order or upon request from the prosecution or defense.
Whatever it is, it has been the most secure no leak op ever. The storm aspect may well be the cacade of unsealing...
Along with the Q plan and all the accomplishments Trump and military did in his first 4 years, and the ones we don't know about up until now. The silent war.
I wonder how/why no one in the media/congress/etc. is talking about Trump taking down international cabal controlled govts like Saudi Arabia, or continuity of govt, various cabal players being neutralized, Biden being controlled by WHs, etc.
For the past 20-years, we've watched indicted people destroy evidence, sometimes very blatantly ("wipe the hard drive - like with a cloth?" or accidentally smashing multiple cell phones?)... and get away with it.
Since nobody knows WHO is named in the sealed indictments, or for what reasons, they continue doing crooked businesses as normal. More evidence of their crimes is gathered against them daily.
When the indictments are unsealed, you can bet the White Hats will have 100% of the evidence to prosecute each one. Now the fun begins. If you strategically unseal the indictments in a certain order, starting from the bottom up, White Hats can get the underlings to turn evidence against bosses. The higher up's won't yet know that they too are under indictment, but they will be watching their minions being indicted, and offered "deals".
By the time the big show begins, the bosses will know multiple indictments will be unsealed against them... and there are dozens of their own minions willing to testify to the boss's crimes. No escape.
It stops the statute of limitations clock awaiting the return of the Trump team.
I have heard this theory, and I think it is correct. But don't you think some federal wonk who has to process these isn't leaking the contents ONCE, tipping people off these indictments are coming? Maybe this really is the primary reason they are so desperate to stop Trump
They may have been leaked to the targets, just not publicly announced.
"Those who scream the loudest have the most to lose."
There have been an increasing number of arrests for child porn and trafficking, which raises the possibility that at least some of the protection has been lost.
"One leads to another..."
u/#q4566
good thought
I have noticed lately that various bigwigs and MS journos seem remarkably concerned that they'll be prosecuted for something heinous the moment Trump gets in office again.
https://bad-boys.us/
These are still pulled from Pacer, right?
Verifiable, right?
yes
But there's lots of reasons court documents are sealed.
You can't tell if these documents are indictments.
Also every document is not a case. I wonder if there is multiples counting there. You can have many sealed documents within the same case
You can use this website to filter the cases, and it says criminal, sealed versus sealed. What else would you call that?
We have no idea what type of document is sealed in these cases.
The entire court record for juvenile defendants is sealed I believe. So even after the case is over things can remain sealed
Go here and look for sealed documents and see which things can be sealed.
https://www.uscourts.gov/statistics-reports/accessing-court-documents-journalists-guide#sealed_documents
It also points to these
Haven't checked ??
Dasting.
Top Sealed by State (per capita)
#1 (5.654) - District of Columbia
#2 (5.549) - New Mexico
#3 (4.289) - North Dakota
#4 (3.008) - Iowa
#5 (2.739) - Rhode Island
#6 (2.612) - Massachusetts
#7 (2.536) - South Dakota
#8 (2.301) - Nebraska
#9 (2.221) - Maryland
How many of these are indictments though?
I'll ask it another way. Can you find me a single sealed indictment in DC that is still sealed a year later.
So I just went to the site and searched for indictment
I found this case. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/16757265/united-states-v-mcgee-sr/
It says this guy was arrested and the case unsealed
Jan 23, 2020 Arrest of Morris McGee, Sr. on 1/23/20. (S,HR)
Jan 23, 2020 Case unsealed as to Morris McGee, Sr. (S,HR)
And that the case was terminated in Feb 2020.
There is a poster on here who contents the contents of the pacer are being misunderstood. I tried pulling individual cases from the bad boys xls to understand but their methodology or how to verify it were not clear to me.
They are bad hombres and will be picked up when the fun begins.
First!
As long as they stay sealed they are protecting the perp. Like, “I can’t comment on an ongoing investigation”, when the investigation never goes anywhere. Just another form of coverup.
Yes. There have been.
If I remember correctly, they people counting
"sealed Indictments" changed it to counting "sealed cases.". This is because they don't know how many of these are actually Indictments. They have no way of knowing based on how they are counting.
Lots of types of court documents are sealed.
Technically they might be for us
If so I haven't heard it????
I heard one person mention an explanation years ago, but I don't remember what it was or if it was valid. I think it was back on T_D.
I have a vague memory also...
Found one post on PDW where someone says they aren't indictments but rather sealed 'court actions.' I don't understand the distinction, but I think it should be pretty easy to confirm whether we are just projecting that we believe they are indictments.
Lots of types of court documents are sealed. You can't tell from pacer which are which.
the cloud of silence is almost as big as the Total Eclipse, isn't!
A moron on the local board formed a belief it was Trump blackmailing dems with bogus charges.
I mean, if “you committed a crime and we are going to bring you to justice” is blackmailing…
And in their world, that is where it starts because that’s when the offer is made. No punishment, just stay in line.
In our world, the offer is, “or you can repent and help atone for your crimes, but this offer expires.”
Well i guess whether charges are 'bogus' on not, in this environment, is in the eye of the beholder.
They are probably for the likes of us…
All those grand juries and no one is talking? No one? Not even one?
I think when Trump’s indictment was unsealed and covered by mainstream media, it could be meant for all to familiarize the term into our arsenal and lexicon. Imo it validates the definition ofQuantum: (Past Q posts, Present News unlocks map, Fuure deltas)
Where are you finding these sealed indictments? I keep hearing this stuff, but nobody ever posts a source.
Pacer.gov. you have to register for an account, and apparently the searches aren't super straightforward. But I have seen enough screenshots and went there to try myself if you years ago that I believe the numbers I am seeing. What is less certain is whether the numbers stand for what we think the number stand for
Some were givin the choice too ? Play your part to avoid the death penalty ... Case is ripe for picking once go is given there part played their justice awaits ,,, all but delivered
One hopes anyway
The only guess I keep seeing posted here is that the sealed indictments are to be used against patriots.
We've seen what happens when cabal pedo-lizards like Epstein do get arrested. They get offed in jail, their client list never released; those high-powered cabal clients get away with everything under the 2-tiered justice system.
So, until a few million sealed indictments are unsealed, we'll just have to wait and see what happens.
Yes, to throw all of us off the tracks.
The DOJ is working on their own plan. The thought police have our names on the indictments for spending time here, the chans and Truth Social. Just waiting for the right time to spring them on us.
Maybe us unvaxxed will be in for a surprise?
I’m thinking they’re all ham sandwiches.
Consider the "panama Papers" ...and one other financial tax haven economy (can't recall)? These networks of global wealth has been operating in the background on a massive scale...outside of all laws and taxes.
Perhaps the indictments are for them... confiscating that wealth to be distributed (a jubilee)
Yeah maybe. But whatever op is driving this, if there is one, has to still be going on at a steady clip. Do the panama papers go that deep?
Found the other big disclosure... it was the "Pandora Papers". And yes, it dives deep into this hidden financial network used by elites. https://www.icij.org/investigations/pandora-papers/global-investigation-tax-havens-offshore/
And although I didn't mention this because it is 100% legal (3 Supreme Court rulings on the books).... take a deep dive into "UBCs" or Unincorporated Business Trusts." I have one. It is a little-known trust used by billionaires. It bypasses all state laws by Secretary of State jurisdiction and also bypasses all death taxes such as inheritance taxes. UBCs can not be audited by the IRS... all they can do is review recorded meeting minutes. Nice trick. 99.9 % of lawyers (who specialize in Trusts) and accountants have never even heard about this. I had to be referred to an accountant in Colorado before he would even discuss setting up the Trust for me.
There has been one alternate theory but I'm not going there again.
An Anon on 4 Chan submitted it as more than a theory, actually.