President Trump just wished the Holy Mother Mary a Happy Birthday.
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (143)
sorted by:
Melania is a devout Catholic. I am praying for his conversion & the conversion of the country.
love it! Mary is one of my the favorites, and Fatima was in 1917🐸
And yes lots of Catholics in Q's movie! I noticed that he frequently mentioned the poor treatment of Catholics during his Iowa caucus rallies,
definitely think he appreciates them and wants to help. of course the Kennedy's were/are Catholic too.
And can't forget JB...
Also right after he became president, the dinner with HRC.
Making jokes about how HRC 'pretends she doesn't hate Catholics'.
exactly^ which makes me wonder even more about HRC's role in all of this...
she plays along well with his insults, etc. so many meme-worthy expressions
As she sat next to Cardinal Dolan!
I think that Catholic dinner was before the election, IIRC. But yes, he was dropping a lot of truth bombs that night.
Amen. Lets hope the devout finally learn what the real 3rd Secret revealed.
yes I can't wait. also remember reading that Kennedy was told about Fatima, adds another layer to his story...
Watch this, the Hermit of Loretto predicted Trump would lead America back to God.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lyV7kwMRzdo
yes! I remember watching this when it first came out, thanks for reminding me.
The Bible says nothing about Mary Magdalene being a whore. That was perpetuated by the Catholic Church approximately 300 years after the Bible was released. They wanted to diminish her standing among the men. Their behavior hasn't changed any. They just don't want women around.
Who's talking about Mary Magdalene???
Did you learn that from Dan Brown?
😂
conversion from Christian to Catholic?
Catholics are the original Christians. Catholics assembled the Bible & Protestants are missing seven books after Luther removed them. He attempted to remove even more, but his followers stopped him.
Lol what a wild misrepresentation.
The assembly of the biblical canon, both Old and New Testament, occurred over several centuries and involved different processes for the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament) and the Christian Scriptures (New Testament).
Old Testament Canon
The Hebrew Bible, or the Old Testament, was largely established by Jewish religious leaders over centuries. It is traditionally believed that the Law (Torah) was completed and recognized as authoritative by around 400 B.C. The Prophets (Nevi'im) and the Writings (Ketuvim) were gradually accepted over time, with the Hebrew canon being solidified by the time of Jesus.
By the first century A.D., the Old Testament books were essentially agreed upon in Jewish tradition, with three main divisions:
The Torah (the first five books)
The Nevi'im (the Prophets)
The Ketuvim (the Writings)
The Council of Jamnia (c. A.D. 90) is sometimes cited as a key moment in confirming the Hebrew canon, although evidence for a formal council is debated. Nonetheless, by the end of the first century, the Hebrew Scriptures had been settled.
New Testament Canon
The process for assembling the New Testament canon was more drawn out, emerging over the first few centuries of Christianity. Early church leaders used several criteria for recognizing books as Scripture:
Apostolic authorship or close connection to the apostles
Consistency with Christian doctrine
Widespread usage in churches for teaching and worship
Key figures in the canonization process include:
Athanasius of Alexandria: His Easter letter in 367 A.D. was the first known document to list all 27 books of the New Testament as canonical.
Councils of Hippo (393 A.D.) and Carthage (397 A.D.): These councils affirmed the 27 books of the New Testament, as they had already been widely accepted by churches.
God's Sovereignty in the Canonization Process
From a classical Judeo-Christian perspective, God sovereignly guided the process of canonization through the work of His Spirit in the church. Although human councils and leaders played roles in formally recognizing the canon, it is believed that God ultimately determined which books were inspired and authoritative.
In summary, the Old Testament canon was formed over centuries within the Jewish community, while the New Testament canon was recognized through the early church solidifying by the 4th century A.D.
Catholics are not the original Christians, one can focus on the following points:
Apostolic Christianity: The earliest Christians, including the apostles, followed a simple form of faith based on Scripture and direct teachings from Jesus Christ. These early believers met in homes, emphasized salvation through faith alone, and adhered to biblical teachings without many of the later developments seen in Catholicism.
Gradual Development of Catholic Doctrine: Many Catholic doctrines (e.g., papal infallibility, veneration of Mary, indulgences) developed over centuries and are not found in the New Testament or early Christian writings. These teachings diverged from the original apostolic practices, reflecting an evolution rather than a continuation of the early faith.
The Great Schism and Protestant Reformation: The Christian Church experienced several splits, most notably the Great Schism of 1054 (East-West) and the Protestant Reformation in the 16th century. Reformers like Martin Luther argued that the Catholic Church had deviated from original Christianity, calling for a return to biblical authority and the simplicity of early Christian faith.
Biblical Authority Over Tradition: Early Christianity was rooted in the authority of Scripture, whereas Catholicism gives equal weight to church tradition. Protestants argue that this addition of extra-biblical tradition represents a departure from the foundational teachings of the apostles.
In conclusion, those who argue that Catholicism isn't the original form of Christianity claim that the early church was simpler, biblically grounded, and free of many later Catholic practices. Therefore, Catholicism is viewed as a development that diverged from the original apostolic faith.
I'll add my biggest personal hang up (of many) with Catholicism here.... Neither Catholic priests nor the Pope meet the biblical requirements laid out in scripture for a pastor or an elder. Period.
1 Timothy 3:1-7 & Titus 1:5-9
A pastor or elder must be a married man. A pastor must be a married man with faithful and obedient children.
This is God's commanded structure for His Church and The shepherds of His flock.
The Catholic Church demands clerical celibacy and doesn't allow priests to be married.
God's Word > Catholic traditions
Very well said.
So "true" Christianity didnt come into being until a obese Catholic Monk broke his vows, married a nun & edited the bible in the year 1517? Got it.
I'll stick with the original, thanks!
You brought a knife to a ballistic missile fight my friend.
There is only One true church.
Indeed , the church of one's relationship with god
It isn’t the current Catholic church for sure.
So what you did there was a dishonest misrepresentation of what I said.
Also known as a lie.
You need to ask for my forgiveness and because you're a Catholic you need to go to confession..... IF you want to call yourself a good Catholic or Christian.
Catholics are the original Christians. The Sacraments were being delivered to followers early on in the early Church. Saint Stephan is our Catholic proto martyr & was a deacon of the early church. He was giving Sacrements as was established by Jesus & his Apostles when he was stoned to death by the Jews, including Saul who would later become Saint Paul.
Learn true Christian history. Its older than what occured in the year 1517 with the Protestant revolts.
So you're not going to repent of the misrepresentation / lie you made out of what I said and ask for my forgiveness?
This is despite what you believe. You misrepresented what I said. You lied.
Looks like it's purgatory for you.
Maybe you can grab a time machine and go back to when the Catholic Church was selling indulgences though.
Your appeals to authority mean nothing when you ignore the ultimate authority is God's word. You're making the same type of argument the Pharisees made against Jesus.
In conclusion " without putting words in your mouth" consensus does not equal correct.
Thank you.
Actually, jews are the original Christians. Catholics love to steal the title.
Christians are the original Christians.
"Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new." ~2 Corinthians 5:17
you are not wrong.
Catholism is the completion of Judaism. Its interesting to note that Jews didn't like the fact that Catholics included seven books to the old Testiment; Martin Luther comes around & removes the books they wanted out of the Cannon. He also was a follower of the Kabbalah.
Protestantism is judiased Christianity. I like Christianity, hold the Judeo.
And the kazarians (modern day Ukraine) were known as the name stealers
I love Catholics, but.. the body of Christ is the body of Christ. Plenty of more pressing issues than praying for Christians to become different Christians, imo
I'm praying for the unity of the Christian faith as it was for over a millenia. A divided house cannot stand but we are all in this together!
Luther never removed a single book, in fact he translated all of them in his German bible that he presented to Frederick.
He removed books and added words, fact.
The Protestant Bible consists of only 66 books ― 39 books in the Old Testament and 27 books in the New Testament. The Catholic (i.e., the original canon) settled upon in the 4th century is contains 73 books including Tobias, Judith, Wisdom, Sirach (i.e., Ecclesiasticus), Baruch, and 1 and 2 Maccabees ― what Protestants call the Apocrypha.
In fact, Luther’s first German translation was missing 25 books (i.e., Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Esther, Job, Ecclesiastes, Jonah, Tobias, Judith, Wisdom, Sirach (i.e., Ecclesiasticus), Baruch, 1 and 2 Maccabees, Matthew, Luke, John, Acts, Romans, Hebrews, James, Jude and Revelation. He referred to the Epistle of James as “straw not worthy to be burned in my oven as tinder.” The rest he called “Judaizing nonsense.” Subsequent Protestants, deciding that Luther wasn’t really inspired by the Holy Spirit, replaced most of the books he had removed.
Look, I’m not one to go hard against Roman Catholicism, but your response to me is just plain inaccurate and intentionally misleading with half-truths. You need to check your sources rather than copy and paste from a biased pro-Roman Catholic website. You’re putting the worst possible construction on Luther and it’s disingenuous at best.
Did Luther not add words "Alone" to his altered Bible to justify his new Theology? Yes, yes he did. Fact.
Did Luther not say the following about the Apostle St. James "Therefore St James’ epistle is really an epistle of straw, compared to these others, for it has nothing of the nature of the Gospel about it. (Luther’s Works 35, 362).
Who would know what Jesus wanted written in the Gospels, one of his Apostles who knew him or a rebellious monk who lived 1,500 years later? I'm going to play it safe & stick with the Apostle.
Aside from the fact that Luther was a Heretical Catholic Monk, what authority did he have to add words to the Bible, remove books & re-arrange the bible? He had NO authority only pride.
Did Luther perform some documented great miracle like split the Red Sea? I dont understand why Prots follow this guy & allow themselves to be seduced by his views.
Perhaps because he told poor souls that they can commit sin & as long as you have a relationship with Jesus, its all good! Go forth & sin.
"Be a sinner and sin boldly, but believe and rejoice in Christ even more boldly." Martin Luther
Its scary to contemplate all millions of souls that may have been lost because of this one Kabbalist.
Did Luther not add words Alone to his altered Bible to justify his new Theology?
Yes, the meaning however was not changed? Whenever there is a translation words are added and removed to make the passage understandable in the vernacular because Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic cannot be translated word for word and account for idioms or phrases that are embodied in a single word. That passage that you call into question is Romans 3:28 whether it reads “justified by faith without the deeds of the law” or justified by faith alone without the deeds of the law” the passage conveys the same meaning…Faith is what justifies, not works.
Did Luther not say the following about the Apostle St. James "Therefore St James’ epistle is really an epistle of straw, compared to these others, for it has nothing of the nature of the Gospel about it. (Luther’s Works 35, 362)@
Yes, he did say that…but he also translated it and wrote an entire commentary to clarify what was meant and often quotes James in other theological writings. As you may or may not be aware, the Council of Nicea formalized the canon and not all books were unanimously adopted (antilegomena), James was one of those books. Luther merely assigns more weight to those books that were unanimous (homolegoumena) that those that were not.
Aside from the fact that Luther was a Heretical Catholic Monk, what authority did he have to add words, remove books & re-arrange the bible?
That’s your opinion…but I’m sure you find the selling of indulgences to pay off the exorbitant usury that Leo had to pay the bankers who funded Peter’s Basilica to be A OK? Luther preserved the church that your corrupt and anti-Christ popes were doing their best to destroy.
Did he commit some great miracle work like split the Red Sea?
No, but he was an instrument of God used to stand up against a corrupt and evil infection within the church. Someday you may come to realize that the immense courage that Luther displayed in the face of certain death, and God rescued him. Probably the most consequential figure in the last 1,500 years.
Are you meaning Roman Catholic when you say Catholic here?
Maybe I’m basic, but all the quarreling over deep church omissions and esoteric Biblical debate is somewhat off-putting to those of us who are learning to walk with Christ. As a recovering agnostic, I have chosen my own generic path, because I see all the back and forth between the religiously devout, and choose “disorganized” religion over the brand names. Perhaps that is what we need right now— unity over bickering about details we cannot prove or disprove. I know people can be passionate about these things, but shouldn’t Christ’s Love be held above anything else?
Its a journey for all of us.I was a cradel Catholic until the Pedo stuff came out. Stepped away for decades but my journey made me learn about an clandestine war between Catholics & secret societies that has been going on for Centuries. Then it was learning about Child Saints like Saint Simon of Trent, Saint William of Norwich, Knights templar worshiping the Baphomet...
Then learning about the Judeo-Masonic infiltration of the Church that happened in the 20th Century. Finally, during 2020, when Revolutionaries burned down Catholic historic Churches across the world, that was my breaking point. I went from being a critic of the (original) Church to a defender of her.
There is a lot of hate for the Church from all sides, hence why I feel a need to boldy proclaim her. God bless & good luck on your journey!
God bless you GR! i def think of relationship with Jesus over religion. there is way too much bickering over religion. talk more about relationship.
i agree with you that Christ's Love should be above all else.
Thank you! Bless you as well, Godknowstheheart!
Q's first image to be posted was of Washington crossing the Delaware river on the 500th anniversary of the Protestant Reformation. The Q movement is about one group of Christians finding it necessary to slit the throats of other Christians on Christmas. Over an issue of just wanting to be separate from the Jew-controlled Holy Roman Empire based out of Frankfurt. The Americans just didn't want to maintain a relationship with England (or pay taxes to the Rothschilds).
King George was being an Ecumenical cuck. He said: "Let's end the bickering, we believe in so much, just lay down your arms, let Christ's love compel us towards unity." Forget King George and forget ecumenical cucks.
I'm giving Trump and the Catholic outsiders some benefit of the doubt, because obviously now is not the time to start a Holy War when the Military's mission is to avoid starting Civil War and it is trying to calm people down so they don't get carried away and start firebombing Synagogues and Mosques and Catholic parishes and Federal Buildings in the coming months.
I think the Military can't and doesn't want to establish a religion, so they won't. But like Trump often does, he points at something, and people talk about it. This board, and the 4chan boards are full of comments for and against Catholicism. For and against Ecumenical efforts. These boards are archived and will be studied in the future. Every school in the United States will want to read what Annons were talking about and warning about, and thinking about in the years before the Storm.
The Biblical Christian Faith as taught by Christ is unique (it is unlike any other faith or school of thought) in that it prophesizes that with each day the Apostate church grows, and false converts continuously water down the scripture until the Ecumenical World Religion of Universalism takes over and exults itself over God. God then destroys the world with fire. Ecumenical efforts provoke God to destroy the world.
Anyone who teaches "All faiths are legitimate, all religions come from God" is sent by the Devil. The devil can and does initiate long cons and he can play good cop and bad cop.
“Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it."
And "By the same word the present heavens and earth are reserved for fire, being kept for the day of judgment and destruction of the ungodly."
I'd rather die in a gulag than so much as eat a meal with an Ecumenical proselytizer.
Exactly
This. A few months ago, a Catholic told me I am surely going to hell because I was too "cheap" to not pay several thousand dollars 50 years ago to become a Catholic (most of a year's salary for me and my husband to get annulment from our 1st marriages. I have since found that I could have passed the not baptized test because I was mormon and Catholics don't recognize mormon baptism)
I miss the literagy. A lot. But I know if I continued attendance, I would be having endless encounters over church policy and no one would put up with my contraryness. I have considered attending Catholic services and sitting in the back and leaving a few minutes early. I can't take the Eucharist, so there's that also.
I’m pulling for the exact opposite.
I'm praying against it!
prepare for battle! 😆
This is a big step and says a lot about where POTUS is after the assassination attempt. God bless him and his family.
No one knows her actual Birthday.
Today is her feast day. It's when we celebrate her birthday. It doesn't matter if it's her exact birthday or not.
Several mystics say it is August 5.
According to you.
Where in the bible does it say when her birthday was?
Where in the Bible does it say we should celebrate birthdays?
Don't be such a JW
I was actually pointing out the obvious logical flaw
JW?
Jehovahs witness
Jehovah Witness
Why are Protestant bibles missing seven books? Lets start there.
Yes please I would love to know this too as my understanding being a Protestant myself is that whatever was removed from the Bible was the Catholics own made up laws and rituals which was not grounded in the teachings of Christ but rather added in as an addition to their religion.
Martin Luther, a man that influenced by the Kabbalah, removed the seven books that Jews wanted out of the cannon. When the Jews refused to convert to hos new version of Christianity, he wrote the book "the Jews & their lies".
Martin Luther read the Talmud and was so horrified and disgusted about what was in it that he wrote "the Jews and their Lies"
Those books were included but labeled as Apocrypha.
Quit lying.
Thanks for knowing what you are talking about
The facts are on my side. The Protestant Bible consists of only 66 books ― 39 books in the Old Testament and 27 books in the New Testament. The Catholic (i.e., the original canon) settled upon in the 4th century is contains 73 books including Tobias, Judith, Wisdom, Sirach (i.e., Ecclesiasticus), Baruch, and 1 and 2 Maccabees ― what Protestants call the Apocrypha.
Read up on Luther, he wanted to take out the Epsitle of James & remove book of Revelations.
Careful friend, you don't want to upset the flat earthers
Flat earthers are an interesting breed with some interesting view points. The fact that the Globalists insists the world is a globe had me thinking for sure. Also the WHO org map of earth is actual flat earth. I’m not thoroughly convinced we are floating around on a ball in infinite space. None of this can be proved in the Bible either although I do get more of a feeling that earth is a center of the universe and not just some insignificant fragment of it. While I do believe other planets exist and floats in the atmosphere I’m not so sure earth is doing the same. Just my two thoughts..I’m not married to either side of the idea. I tend to assume we have been lied to and therefore question everything we’ve been taught.
No judgement from me as long as you remain open to facts. Try this , the stars turn on the horizon clockwise in the northern hemisphere and counterclockwise in the south. That's indisputable
If that's the case, did you not wonder why all the removed books are from the OT? How would the Catholics insert into the OT their own laws and rituals before they (& Jesus) even existed?
Notice you have to change the subject and use a logical fallacy to dip out of backing up your assertion.
kek. noticed
Does one of the seven books say when her birthday was?
Well the Masons…..
Freemasons - Catholics
is a fascinating "pendulum binary lense" to look at the cabal through. Sorry if that label is confusing, it's the best I got at the moment. Different periods in history one side is on top and the other is suppressed. Freemasonic thought has likely been on the earth under other names, while the Catholic polarity of it has maintained its name (Catholic) since it adopted it, but before that the power structure was also present all the way back to the Tower of Babel (one supreme ruler at the top)
Mystery Babylon is a confusing harlot
Martin Luther was a Rosecrutian Gnostic. Hense, Protestanism is a divergence of the purity of the faith.
Catholics have been at war with Gnostism (Freemasonry) for several centuries prior to the advent of Protestantism existance. Fact.
I don't believe God is a poligsmist & wanted different 45,000 churhes that have sprung up over the past 500 years. But hey, that's just what I believe & I chose to remain loyal to the original Church founded by his Apostles.
Thank you for this. I've been trying to find a better term for Freemasonry, as I know it dates much farther back in time than the literal orders titled "Freemasons". Yes indeed, they fight, but only because the gnostics worship their own minds while the pope seeks for all to worship his. (and you can break this down the ranks of the Catholic church with cardinals etc. but in essence it begins at the top, naturally.)
The way I see it we basically have two sides:
Gnostic self-worship VS the Tower of Babel
Anarchy VS Totalitarianism
Thanks be to God that neither one shall prevail on His earth. The secular authorities are the only lawful enforcers, and the spiritual laws and principals God passed onto us are the only valid doctrines upon which to establish secular laws. It's quite beautiful.
It's a legitimate question. Btw, what are the seven books?
The Protestant Bible consists of only 66 books ― 39 books in the Old Testament and 27 books in the New Testament. The Catholic (i.e., the original canon) settled upon in the 4th century is contains 73 books including Tobias, Judith, Wisdom, Sirach (i.e., Ecclesiasticus), Baruch, and 1 and 2 Maccabees ― what Protestants call the Apocrypha.
Thank you.
Yes happy birthday Mary. Still won't pray to you though! (not that you'd ever expect me to, or that you'd even hear me!)
That emoji is white supremecist sir. Please amend your behavior to reflect the diverse nature of our reeeeality or face the consequences!
👌
This is a photo of Our Lady of Guadalupe - Mary appeared to Juan Diego in 1531 and she asked him to have the bishop build a church on Tepeyec(sp). The bishop asked for a sign and when he unfolded his cloak it was filled with roses- this cloak still hangs in the church. Going from memory….
9 Million Indians converted upon the apperition. Just has Europe was loosing the faith, God brought millions of souls into the faith in the New World.
God is GREAT!
God is much greater than that . You diminish God when you credit him with these tiny little insignificant events. The creator of all things is especially incomprehensible to someone like yourself that blindly follows a gold hat, incense swinging, boy raping clown. Hope I didn't go too far
None of what you said upsets me. I personally just want to allign myself with the Church founded by Jesus& his Apostles; it's led me back home & I am working out my salvation with fear and trembling.
I personally hope that the gates of salvation are open to all Christians but I fear that it may not be; that is what has me sticking with the original Church despite what the world says or this "Pope" does to continue to scandalize the faithful.
In that case I sincerely apologize for being rude(on purpose) Have no fear friend. If you're heart is truly with Jesus that is all you need, his words not mine. When in doubt ignore the church hierarchy and read Christ's words. You will always find comfort in his presence
Fr. Ripperger's Prayer Consecrating the Election to the Virgin Mary
Mary Immaculate, living tabernacle of the Divinity, where the eternal Wisdom lies hidden to be adored and served by angels and men, Queen of heaven and of earth, beneath whose sway are subject all things that are lower than God, Patroness of the United States of America, sorrowful and mindful of our own sinfulness and the sins of our nation, we come to Thee, our refuge and hope. Knowing that our country cannot be saved by our own works and mindful of how much our nation has departed from the ways of Thy Son, we humbly ask that Thou wouldst turn Thine eyes upon our country to bring about its conversion. We consecrate to Thee the integrity of the upcoming election and its outcome, so that what is spiritually and morally best for the citizens of our country may be accomplished, and that all of those who are elected would govern according to the spiritual and moral principles which will bring our nation into conformity with the teachings of Thy Son. Give grace to the citizens of this land so that they will choose leaders according to the Sacred Heart of Thy Son, that His glory may be made manifest, lest we be given the leaders we deserve. Trusting in the providential care of God the Father and Thy maternal care, we have perfect confidence that Thou wilst take care of us and will not leave us forsaken. O Mary Immaculate, pray for us. Amen.
Thank you for posting this. I was unaware of it.
I never understood the hatred and outright rejection of Mary and her veneration. I just assumed it came from Christians who emphasized the God aspect of Jesus over the human aspect. They usually claim that Jesus didn't need parents, that He was God and Mary was just a vessel. They ignore the fact that Jesus didn't come into the world as God, but as one of us, a human infant. A human infant is the most powerless, helpless, and defenseless creature on earth, and that is exactly how Jesus was born. He needed not only for Mary to bring him into the world, but he needed parents to protect and nurture him until his time was at hand.
After listening to Fr. Ripperger only a few times, I understood the root of that rejection. Satan hates and despises Mary for her lifelong obedience and sacrifice to follow God's will, which of course led to his defeat by Jesus. It makes so much more sense from that perspective. If Mary had refused, which she had the free will to do, there would have been no Jesus on earth, no defeating Satan, and no salvation for us. We owe our salvation not just to Jesus, but to Mary, and she is the ultimate role model for us.
I wonder how anyone can claim to love Jesus and disrespect His mother at the same time. There is no doubt how much He loved her and understood the depth of her sorrow when He was crucified. While dying in agony on the cross, He actually took time to make sure she had a place to live afterwards.
Amen!
No despises Mary more than Lucifer, thus the fall. He's just trying to get as many to follow him that he can.
Thank you for articulating so beautifully the miracle that is the Holy Family. I love this Marian hymn, its beauty really is worthy of her:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouacvQWASFw
Possibly true is that Mary and her mother were of virgin birth. The apocryphal texts
Amen
Ave Maria, gratia plena, Dominus tecum. Benedicta tu in mulieribus, et benedictus fructus ventris tui, Jesus. Sancta Maria, Mater Dei, ora pro nobis peccatoribus, nunc et in hora mortis nostrae.
English:
Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with thee. Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus. Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us sinners, now and at the hour of our death.
"male fetal cells can persist in a mother's blood for decades after pregnancy, and can even integrate into her organs and tissues. This phenomenon is known as microchimerism, and it occurs when cells from the fetus cross the placenta and enter the mother's bloodstream. "
Mary had God literally inside of her. If she is not holy I do not know who is
She was also predicted in the old Testiment: The virgin birth is predicted in the Old Testament in Isaiah 7:14, which reads, "Behold, a virgin will be with child and bear a son, and she will call His name Immanuel.
She is special.
Keke! A simple happy birthday gonna cause a big stir! Keke
Reading through these comments really shows why our Founding Fathers included the Establishment Clause in the First Amendment.
All of this is why we're not a "Christian Nation" as so many people want to claim.
Imagine the nightmare if we were a Christian Nation and tried to make laws and regulations based on religion.
There would be so much infighting over who were the "real Christians" or "The Original Christians" and which denomination was the "real" or "right" or "true" denomination that nothing would ever get done (not that much gets done now).
Imagine having a group of Religious Advisors made up of Catholics, Baptists, Presbyterians, Methodists, Orthodoxy, Amish, Pentecostal, Mormons and all the other sects trying to make religious laws.
It would be a hot mess with everyone arguing over who were "Real Christians" and which version would be used to make our laws. Maybe the Amish would perform a coup and we all would have to trash our cellphones and all other electronics and buy new wardrobes.
All of this shown here in this comment section is why we should never be a theocracy.
George Washington allegedly converted to Catholicism in his death bed. I for one, hope he repented of his involvement with Freemasonry..
9/8 = 17
It's also the day QE died.
and I believe that was 1700 days after an important Q date, but not sure IIRC what it was. end of Roe v Wade perhaps...
There is no Christian or Catholic celebration of Mary on this date I am able to find. What is the purpose of this post? Some code for 17 (9/8)?
https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/seasons-and-feast-days/nativity-of-mary-21252
Thanks. Was not finding any information in my search.
Ask President Trump yourself.
GOD isnt a respecter of days and times. Tells us not to be too.
Respecter?
Cradel?
cradle 👶