AG BONDI JUST SPRUNG THE GREATEST TRAP EVER. Yesterday, AG Bondi sat before the House Judiciary Committee. Standard oversight hearing—routine questions, angry questions, gotcha questions, Dems storming out! THEN she pulled out a file folder, labelled: "Jayapal Pramila—Search History." And... SILENCE
(media.greatawakening.win)
🍿 POPCORN 🍿
I was JUST writing an article on this and you beat me to it u/catsfive!
u/#topkek
This is PEAK 5D chess!
THIS is how you capture a dangerous animal and instill PANIC IN DC!
Did you include the actual screenshot in your article? Because nobody in this thread seems to understand they're not tracking "search history"... They're tracking access to individual PDF files.
So they know which files she's looking at, but there's nothing here to indicate they are tracking or storing search terms.
https://files.catbox.moe/v6tp03.PNG
Still writing the article. Doing some digging. I'll see what I can find.
“Torture video” - I know what’s supposed to be in emails but the reality of it is so disturbing and it’s only going to get worse. God help us!
It was mentioned that it is not appropriate for the DOJ to be spying on sitting members of congress....... except if you are Jack Smith, I guess.
That would mean Jayapal Pramila is under investigation for something.
That would be a win.
What makes you think it is the DOJ monitoring traitors ?
Does FiSA go both ways ?
You misspelled "servants of the people of the republic"
And like most employees they should expect no privacy especially when reviewing sensitive material, since they are known to leak like the titanic.
She just played the best blonde joke ever.
I'll admit I was pretty worked up over it. I even posted a link here to the Forbes video clip and said Bondi looked very bad. I still agree with that statement, but if it was all an act then Bravo
But I'd say this is still a wait-and-see because we haven't seen any kind of arrests yet so tick-tock that all continues...
Them looking up there own names or the names of their real constituents and then making calls or sending comms of any kind is probably what matters. The DOJ knows who's in there. The trap was probably the PANIC moves made in the last 72 hours and now the next 72 hours... I'm wondering how many are going to run or fake their deaths this weekend.
She definitely sent a message to Congress...we can see what you're interested in and worried about.
It's like she just checked her boyfriend's web search history and recent text/call logs... and is no longer in a relationship...
I'm holding out hope that they are compiling a list of arrests to occur a few weeks before the midterms. Not a lot of hope, but hope.
No point in arresting someone if an apparatchik "judge" is just going to let them go.
TBH, I haven't had a chance to watch the full hearing yet. I only watched a clip that included when she was talking to Massie. In that clip, she looked haggard and scrambled.
If it truely was a honey trap, then hats off. Now arrest the fuckers.
Just fucking do ANYTHING.
u/#q2724
That's a hot delta.
Happy Valentines’ Day
https://x.com/MrPool_QQ/status/2022040423737462789
Nitter link please.
Thanks
xcancel.com/MrPool_QQ/status/2022040423737462789
OK OP pls clue us in on this dude.
PAM BONDI JUST PLAYED THE GREATEST TRAP IN POLITICAL HISTORY.
And Congress walked right into it.
Yesterday, Attorney General Pam Bondi sat before the House Judiciary Committee. Standard oversight hearing. Routine questions.
Then she pulled out a document.
Labeled: "Jayapal Pramila — Search History."
The room went SILENT.
⚠️ HERE'S WHAT HAPPENED
The DOJ gave Congress access to the unredacted Epstein files this week. Every member got their own login. Their own computer. Their own session.
What Congress didn't know?
The DOJ was tracking EVERY SINGLE SEARCH.
Every name they looked up. Every document they opened. Every file they downloaded.
ALL OF IT. LOGGED.
And Bondi brought the receipts to the hearing.
🔺 THE PANIC WAS INSTANT
Rep. Jayapal called it "spying on members of Congress." Rep. Raskin accused Bondi of "blatant abuse of power." Rep. Moskowitz said it was "suspicious and inappropriate."
They're FURIOUS.
But here's the question nobody in the media is asking:
Why are they so scared of their search history?
If you're searching for evidence of crimes against children — you'd be PROUD of that search history.
Unless you're not searching for evidence. Unless you're searching for YOUR OWN NAME.
⚡ THE GENIUS OF THE TRAP
Think about it.
Bondi didn't just release the files. She released them on MONITORED COMPUTERS.
Every Congress member who rushed to search the files just told the DOJ exactly: • WHO they're trying to protect • WHAT names they're worried about • WHICH connections they're trying to verify
The ones searching for "flights to the island" = investigators. The ones searching for SPECIFIC NAMES = protectors.
Bondi now knows who's investigating and who's COVERING UP.
And she showed them she knows. In front of cameras. With a smile.
🔺 THE DHS SHUTDOWN — PERFECT TIMING
While Congress panics about their search history, DHS is shutting down SATURDAY.
Democrats blocked the funding bill. House members already left Washington.
The same week Congress gets caught searching Epstein files — they REFUSE to fund the department that investigates trafficking?
They're not defunding DHS to save money. They're defunding it to STOP INVESTIGATIONS.
⚡ CONNECT THE DOTS
Monday: Congress gets Epstein file access. Tuesday: Members frantically search for names. Wednesday: Bondi reveals she tracked everything. Thursday: Democrats block DHS funding. Friday: Government shutdown begins.
Five days. One pattern. PANIC.
They walked into the hearing thinking they were in control. They walked out knowing Bondi has EVERYTHING.
Every search. Every name. Every cover-up attempt.
Logged. Documented. WEAPONIZED.
The hunter became the hunted. And they did it to themselves.
⟁ DARK TO LIGHT.
These people are stupid.Given the following parameters, you didn’t realize that your searches were going to be tracked. Good grief, none of these yards should be representing us.
From Grok: A DOJ tech person or staff member logs each member into the system, assigning them their own unique identification, username, and password. This creates an individual account for each lawmaker, which tracks their activity—including searches, opened documents, and time spent in the room—for security and compliance reasons (e.g., to prevent unauthorized release of victim information, according to DOJ statements).
Well...Good!
Now these shitheads know what we poor slobs have to endure on a daily basis with MicroShaft Teams BULLSHIT!
u/#catdance
💯
No search is private on government servers.
Exactly, the fact that these idiots thought that their searches would be show that they’re idiots.
These people are stupid.
Is any search private anywhere?
Not really. But definitely not in the workplace - especially the government.
Anyone want to market VPN services to Rich Congress Critters?
They are only rich because they have been stealing your money...
Thanks Nords! Great recap!
thx!
One must be mentally retarded or have lived under a rock for the past 3-4 decades, to not assume EVERY keystroke would be logged when they "researched" the files. Too stupid to breathe
Click on link first comment, explains everything
OK thx
Why is it a big deal if someone searches for their own name? I think that’s a normal thing to do, I mean wouldn’t Trump search for his own name? Maybe I’m missing something
I don’t think they were searching for their own names; I think they were searching for their handlers names. This about more than just crimes against children; it’s a money trail, who is reporting to whom. We know Pramila reported to Epstein. What else did we find out through their searches? Problem is, now that they know what game is being played, the really smart ones probably didn’t do any searches for themselves (why staff wasn’t allowed) but that doesn’t mean low level reps didn’t do the bidding of senior level reps and report back to them. The panicking by the DS is about to get much worse, and when that happens is when the masses become casualties of their war.
But, in typical RICO investigations/prosecutions, low-level persons can - and often do - rat out higher-level persons to save themselves.
Thus, "Panic".
:-)
It's the comms they sent and received while looking that was the desired Intel.
Do you have an example of a comm that could be sent while looking? Like they looked up ‘pizza’ and that means they are a pedophile? I guess I don’t get it
I'm saying they looked to see how much trouble they and their real constituents are in and then contacted their current conspirators on what moves to make ASAP. That is the comms I'm thinking they were after.
Oh yes that makes sense
You miss spelled "real bosses".
Lets say one of the congress members searched for a specific name, [unknown] victim, or company that has not yet been publicly revealed as connected with Epstein.
The question then becomes why search for that name in the Epstein files? Why, oh why?
And also, what connection does the congress critter have to that name?
Searching for something like that reveals a potential foreknowledge of criminal connections to pedo-island.
It was a truly brilliant move by Blondi Bondi.
I agree that searching their own names is defensible. But it's likely that after searching their own names, they searched for their contacts, their handlers, their main donors, searches on behalf of close contacts, etc. The more specific searches, the more questions they raise.
Yea they could make connections and know things they shouldn’t depending on what they searched for.. 5D chess thinking
Why did Jefferies want Epstein to visit him?
What if congress critters were searching to see if their victims were in the Epstein files. What if they don't know if they fell for a honey trap or just thought that they victimized someone sent over by their friend the talk show host?
All kinds of potential things like that. One thing leads to another.
Even if there's nothing at all on the committee members in the Epstein files, just bringing the search history folders and displaying them changed the tone in the room. And she can say she was reviewing their searches to better prepare for their questions.
Definitely not evidence admissible in court.
Was in 2020. The show trials of Trump after the couplection were to set a precedent.
Ms.Bondi - did you or other members of the Department of Justice also monitor the members of Congress trying to access the names in the Sealed Indictments database?
Ohhhh, ya. We can bet the swamplings were trying that too...
the fear of not knowing, just continual wondering.
Now it makes sense why certain individuals in the files were redacted to us but not Congress, love it.
She gave them a million bad soundbites and you think she won? All she did was spin, evade and throw ad hominems. She's so incompetent I'm beginning to think she's a saboteur.
It's just a list of things in the documents.
https://ibb.co/bMxzMVqZ
What many of you still do not understand about this operation is that these people are obviously ACTORS.
Pres. Trump has played the part of the dumb orange man on countless occasions to lure the Democrats into a plethora of traps over the years. It is a known and effective strategy to disarm your opponent.
This comes straight out of Sun Tzu, and I can't believe we still have Anons who don't understand this.
"If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant."
"Hold out baits to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and crush him."
Pam Bondi is the BAIT that is meant to expose the choleric temper of the Deep State and irritate them into making colossal mistakes.
IKR... ignorance runs rampant in all circles
They're not anons. They're students.
This is not a criticism. It's a process. An experience.
Anons don't ebb and flow. They're granite. Cozy as fk, watching a movie.
Reaching that state is not the realm of the intellect. It's experience, sacrifice and loss. Years of it. Because they knew to believe. Deep down. And the years rolled by...
Grizzled vets with internal scars, a life wrestling with doubt; questioning sanity with no sleep, anxious and depressed, FBIAnon, Behold the Pale Horse, Voat-vet, ChanMan, JFK ... and so much more. Every step took another piece. They chose to lose the world they believed ... for the truth. All I want is the truth. And to bring down a great evil.
They don't need to coerce or convince. They lived through a thing that claimed many, and made it this far. They bore the weight, planted the flag and held the beach that everyone is running across, to see it through; to finish it.
Anons. The few who knew, and stayed. Sip a warm cup, pedes. It's been a ride. You're still here.
I’m a “granite” anon as you describe but I still feel a LOT of anxiety about this entire operation because despite having “all the cards” our team is made up of humans AND humans make mistakes and there’s still no guarantee of success and even if there is, there’s still no guarantee of the enemy being totally destroyed (eg it’s real life and real life is still dangerous)
I get it. It's not easy. And you're right about the human element, and human nature.
To be honest, I think things haven't gone as they planned. That's why we need deep faith in God to make it through. It's a battle for souls, between the forces of good and evil.
Evil has reigned here for millennia. Now it is exposed - the only way to defeat it. In the end, Go(o)d wins. Nothing can stop it because it is not for us to decide. Humans are the instruments, acting out; choosing a side, and choosing our own future.
This is a process.The outcome is already decided. Dark to Light.
I feel that? Godspeed anon. And keep the faith!
I choose to believe, despite how things look at times.
Regardless, I’m going to the gulags almost guaranteed so this is my only chance at survival lol
There are also still shills and subversives about sowing seeds of doubt. So there's that.
Yes. There always have been. Intel ops targeting the community, too
Yeah she made a complete fool of herself, to the point that I now think scam blondi is a black hat.
She hasn't done ANYTHING but make trump team look incompetent, promise the Epstein documents and later pretend like nothing existed, and did nothing but do makeup and go on fox news.
I really hope the above stuff is true, but getting search terms is t that huge of a "gotcha"...
All the normies I see online are seeing that hearing as a win for the Dems and a massive loss for trump, and I agree she looked retarded when asked about Epstein and she starts fumbling and stuttering about "the dow Jones is $50,000!!!" When it had zero relevance...
I pray she is playing a role, but part of me worries she is a black hat and doing nothing for trump team, aside from sabotaging and stopping trump from accomplishing anything :/
We shall see where this goes
Edit so I don't get banned again for having doubts about OPs thread, here is the other thread where we aren't sure what color her hat is: https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASFhUmhz2/pardon-me-if-this-has-already-be/c/
I’m betting she’s a WH, playing a really tough role.
Barnes does not have anything nice to say about her. At worst, she's implicated in the whole George Zimmerman case, trying to make him look racist or some shit.
If she's just acting a role right now, instead of actually being retarded, it's because she made a deal to save herself.
I love it that the Jayapal Freakazoid is getting the attention 'it' deserves.
Speaking of, I'm old enough to remember this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVuuzTJBE5Y
yeah, watch that head bob up and down in agreement.
Let's 👀 LOOK 👀 closer....
u/#pepedetective
At the top of a folder was a tweet from Whitehouse from July in which he called for ethics investigations into members of the U.S. Supreme Court who may have violated rules.
The second note reads "Whitehouse" in bold letters, then fed Bondi the line, "You claim to be a social justice warrior, but you're a member of the Senate," and then cuts off in the photo.
The next line reads, "You rail against dark money but you work with dark money groups."
The third bullet point was underlined in blue pen, reading, "You talk about corruption but you push for legislation that would ....,"
The fourth bullet point read simply, "You're a total hypocrite."
"If asked admit personnel or firings — I'll tell you a personnel issue that I'm [missing word] agents are on the streets keeping America [missing words] a paycheck b/c you voted to shut [missing words]."
Finally, a note that she used several times, that was also handwritten, read, "Epstein— Did you take $ from Reid Hoffman???"
Sauce: https://www.rawstory.com/pam-bondi-sheldon-whitehouse/
No government official should be above the law.
The American people deserve a comprehensive investigation into the potential violations of ethics and tax laws by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Senator @RonWyden and I sent a letter to AG Garland making the case.
https://x.com/SenWhitehouse/status/1810702516369449198
Is there a video? I wanted to see the looks on their faces. And her smile when she sprung the trap.
That's what I was hoping to find too.
Sad Pepe face
I had a feeling that Bondi is being grilled by people in Congress who are on video doing some pretty horrible things, and Bondi has seen the videos.
I am thinking that the people in Congress are fishing for information.
So, the idea is somehow this was a trap to see if they searched their own name? I have to be honest with you. Even if I was 100% innocent and had never met Epstein. I would still search my own name to make sure no one planted it. I don't see how this is an admishion of guilt at all. Maybe there was some valuable damning information in their search histories. I don't know. But searching your own name isn't one of them.
If not tragic - this movie would sometimes be a comedy.
Wait for the videos come out… hook-line-sinker
NufFIN iz Habb3niNG right?
More info please.
Congressional and Bipartisan Backlash The fallout from the revelation was swift and severe, drawing criticism from across the political spectrum.
House Speaker Mike Johnson, a key Republican ally of President Trump, publicly stated that tracking lawmakers' searches was "inappropriate" and that members should have the right to review documents without surveillance. He called it a potential "oversight" by the DOJ. Representative Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, denounced the action as "Orwellian" and an "outrageous abuse of power." He demanded the DOJ immediately cease tracking searches and requested an investigation by the DOJ's Inspector General. Representative Nancy Mace, a prominent Republican who has pushed for transparency on the Epstein files, confirmed on social media that the DOJ was indeed "tagging all documents" accessed by members, calling the practice "creepy." Representative Jared Moskowitz (D-FL) described the process as "suspicious" and "inappropriate," emphasizing that lawmakers should have been informed if their searches were being monitored. This rare bipartisan consensus framed the DOJ's actions not as a brilliant trap, but as a serious breach of the separation of powers and an intrusion into Congress's constitutional oversight authority.
Escalating Calls for Impeachment and Accountability The "search history" incident has significantly amplified existing calls for Attorney General Bondi's removal.
Impeachment Momentum: Prior to the hearing, Democratic Representative Shri Thanedar had already announced plans to introduce articles of impeachment against Bondi, citing her handling of the Epstein files and other actions. The new revelations have strengthened this push. Prediction markets like Polymarket showed Bondi's odds of leaving the Cabinet spiking from 45% to 52% in the 24 hours following the hearing. Criticism of Priorities: Critics argue that Bondi's focus has been on deflecting criticism of President Trump rather than pursuing justice for Epstein's victims. Her repeated outbursts during the hearing, including calling Raskin a "washed-up loser lawyer," and her refusal to apologize to survivors in the room, have been widely condemned as unprofessional and a dereliction of duty. Cover-Up Allegations: The core accusation is that the DOJ, under Bondi, is engaged in a "grotesque cover-up" to protect powerful individuals, including potentially President Trump, by improperly redacting names of perpetrators while, in some cases, failing to adequately protect victims' identities in the released documents. The result is a deepening crisis for the Justice Department, with its credibility severely damaged in the eyes of many lawmakers and the public.
Outstanding! 🤓
Wow! >>==> The Name is Bond, Pamela J. Bondi ;-) Trump," What a Job ".
IfI had a hunch about some creepy celebrity, I'd definitely look then up. Doesn't mean I'm protecting them. Also if I were a high profile person I'd see if anyone mentioned my name.
What about looking up your black mail handler to see if they are in the files? What about looking up their associates? This goes well beyond happenstance "oh I wonder if Tom Cruise is in the files." That is a convenient normie take to deflect from this absolute genius chess move.
These people are incredibly retarded when it comes to technology. Q knew this was their Achilles heel this entire time, and has used tech to back them into a corner every step of the way.
Well she is a freak not a high profile person in normal people's mind at all. So yeah,very suspicious
Would you be outraged about it? Because I wouldn't be outraged if an investigation into Harvey Weinstein or some such were opened because I searched for him.
These guys are outraged though.
The Bestest Blonde Joke ever:
A blonde walks into the Congress … and the Congress dies
So, pondering this further, don't you think its strange, Netanyahu was in the White House while this was taking place ? Pam may be leveraging with her presentation, but I get the sick feeling Bebe is trying to pressure Trump into having his demands met. And blackmail is the insinuation. Bombing Iran is imminent and the area is being loaded up. Although this is being hailed as a Trump Jedi manuever, Bebe makes it all feel the inverse, like a pressure put on Trump. We will see if this turns into some kind of hot war, but I can't ignore this duality, many see it, feel it also.
It’s Matt Gaetz, he’s the hammer. Scaramucci model active.
I really hope so. There's no one I'd rather see take them all down, after what bullshit they pulled with his family.
ALL OF IT ... LOGGED ... DOJ maintains audit logs and tracking of all access to the sensitive, unredacted Epstein document database. They were granted in-person access to review these files on secure DOJ terminals at headquarters or a designated satellite office.
Because this was public, the general public knows too of the trap. The outrage of the Senators means this will be discussed on EVERY MSM outlet. This educates the sleepers again! They’re hitting them over and over again with the Epstein files. I was out and had a conversation with a woman and quickly realized she was anti President Trump and hard believe pro biden (who?). I brought up the Epstein files… and she actually knew of them. That’s good a sign. The more they learn the more likely they are to wake up. I think this is part of the strategy.
Could not imagine defending a subject who was intimate friends with that other subject.
Still waiting for her to actually do something.