President Trump: "I am directing EVERY Federal Agency in the United States Government to IMMEDIATELY CEASE all use of Anthropic's technology"
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤖 MISANTHROPIC 👾
It has always been the case that the US GOV has seized technology used in war, and sometimes the developer just disappears, strangely
This practice goes back decades.
The left being mad about this, is forgetting this history. THIS time, in THIS case, Trump's administration asked them. Rather than seizing it at gunpoint like in the past.
They said no. That was a mistake. They'll go with Palantir and OpenAI or Musk's now.
In fact, I think Trump set up Anthropic to act like an asshole so that he could justify giving the no bid contract to ELON MUSK without the appearance of nepotism or favoritism.
5Dchess. Once again.
In this case, I believe the objective wasn't so much to acquire the technology but rather expose it for being anti-American and traitorous.
Its POTUS' playbook.
Bring enemies close, put them in the spotlight, expose their treason, bring about their downfall, rinse and repeat.
The United States Military has capabilities beyond what any of us can possibly fathom. I highly doubt they actually needed Anthropic's tech to begin with.
what Anthropic products are anti-American and traitorous?
Yes.
Is this reddit now with brain dead responses?
How come no one's interested in anthropics explanation as to why?
I've no idea, every video I've seen with the CEO explaining his stance seemed reasonable to me which is why I asked what about them is anti-American and instead of getting an answer apparently brain dead idiots just down vote instead of having a discussion.
I'm guessing the people down voting my question are just in the dark as the rest of us, if they can't handle a question then they shouldn't be here.
Well, the test wouldn't be conclusive, but there are plenty of examples of people testing words and phrases to infer bias. Asking if George Floyd was a good person, for example.
when you train a language model on garbage data expect garbage results.
AI is nothing but garbage in, garbage out.
All, if there is more than one.
Their only conditions were to not use their AI in zero human input kill drones. C'mon man.
in case you doubt (AI saved me a lot of time here)
Invention Secrecy Act: Under the Invention Secrecy Act, the U.S. government can prevent a patent from being granted if it deems an invention a threat to national security. This allows the government to withhold the invention from public disclosure and, in effect, control its use.
Defense Production Act (DPA): The DPA grants the president authority to direct private industry to prioritize government contracts, including for critical technologies. While not a direct seizure, it enables the government to compel production or access to essential resources, including advanced technology, during emergencies or wartime.
Military Acquisition and Reverse Engineering: Historically, the U.S. has actively acquired foreign military technology during conflicts. For example, during the Cold War, the U.S. recovered and reverse-engineered Soviet aircraft and missiles (like the MiG-15 and SA-2) to understand enemy capabilities and improve its own systems.
International Law and War Booty: In armed conflict, under the law of war, captured military equipment—including advanced autonomous weapon systems (AWS)—can be seized and used by the capturing state. While prize law traditionally applies to vessels, modern interpretations suggest that captured military technology, especially if it serves a legitimate military objective, may be lawfully taken and repurposed.
Government Use of Patented Inventions: Even if a private individual holds a patent, the U.S. government may use the invention without consent under the principle of "government use rights," especially when it serves national defense. The inventor cannot sue to stop the use, though they may be entitled to reasonable compensation.
Every single one of those are a direct violation of the Constitution, and a direct violation of the rights of the owners of the company, or companies, the government targets. The government was never delegated any such power, nor could it be.
Great!
Now do property tax.
Income tax, too
Property tax isn't federal.
Rights aren't granted by the Federal Gov't.
The Right to Keep and Bear Arms isn't Federal, it's a natural right (or God given) yet states trample on it all the time.
Same for the right to own property.
I said none of that. I only pointed out that property taxes aren't collected by the federal government, so they have nothing to do with it. It's city and county governments that collect them to pay for roads, streets, police, etc.
What part of "Rights aren't granted by the Federal Gov't" are you misunderstanding?
Natural rights exist, period. FedGov chooses to recognize those rights, which includes the right to own property. c.f. right to keep and bear arms which is constantly violated by the states.
QED property tax is unConstitutional.
And in quibbling over this, you have completely missed my point, which is that FedGov does stuff that is unConstitutional all the time. This happens because there is no punishment allocated for violating the rights of individuals in the Constitution.
Did anybody ask anthropic why?? Perhaps we can start the conversation from there.
"This is a real post from President Trump, made today (February 27, 2026) on Truth Social. Here's the context behind it:
The dispute: The Pentagon has been pushing Anthropic to allow the U.S. military to use Claude AI "for all lawful purposes" without restrictions. Anthropic refused, holding two firm lines: Claude will not be used in fully autonomous weapons and will not be used for mass domestic surveillance of Americans. CEO Dario Amodei stated the company "cannot in good conscience accede" to the Pentagon's demands.
What happened today: The Pentagon had set a 5:01 PM ET deadline for Anthropic to agree to their terms. Trump's Truth Social post came about an hour before that deadline passed. After the deadline, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth designated Anthropic a "supply-chain risk to national security," effectively blocking all federal contractors from doing business with the company CBS News — a designation typically reserved for foreign adversaries.
Anthropic's response: The company said it would "challenge any supply chain risk designation in court," arguing the designation "would both be legally unsound and set a dangerous precedent for any American company that negotiates with the government." CBS News
Broader industry reaction: OpenAI said it has the same "red lines" as Anthropic regarding autonomous weapons and mass surveillance. Over 100 Google workers sent a letter demanding similar limits on Gemini's military use. Anchorage Daily News
Anthropic said its objections were rooted in the belief that "today's frontier AI models are not reliable enough" for these use cases — not ideological opposition to military AI broadly. Anchorage Daily News
This is a rapidly developing story with significant implications for AI governance, national security, and the relationship between the tech industry and the federal government."
I'm not seeing the problem in the government not using AI in kill drones and spying networks against Americans. Fuck is wrong with everyone today? These are bad things now because Trump tweeted about it? Everyone here is acting like libshits do when they're told to believe something.
I feel ya
Lol the military already uses Google for missile guidance...(among a ton of other things).
CBS News? Really?
https://www.gotquestions.org/anthropic-principle.html
That was an excellent article, best of its kind I've seen. One question that comes to mind is can life emerge from a humanly hostile environment in its own form.
God makes it look easy 😁
News saying Open AI signed a deal hours later.
Right after they made public statement that along with Google, they dont want their AI to be used for military or whatever.
Open Ai is worse as a company it seems. And the CEO seems like a total grifter who (allegedly) had a whistleblower murdered. and Chat GPT is woke af.
So why? If they are basically taking the models and using them, maybe combining them all then makes sense. But anything other than Grok at this point seems stupid.
HOLY S**T, this is savage! Can we apply "follow the Constitution, not your terms of service" philosophy to the Big6 Tech Oligopoly now?
Not gay, but I think I love this man.
Totally! Jesus wasn't gay but he loved all men.
Right there with you brother…no homo
I laughed out loud at this... what a memory! Was that Voat where we'd say "I love you, no homo" I know it was middle school, but wasn't that carried over to voat?????
That’s where i think I learned it
AFAIK No Homo comes from the hip-hop community and has been replaced, sadly, by "pause".
I've been known to say "bring back No Homo" when I see "pause" used instead.
Just a small battle in the culture wars.
Pause…I would like to know what’s the new word for tranny? I’m gonna inter change those two every once and awhile just for fun.
We Follow the Constitution , BITCH ! And let you competitors know.
Do we really want the military to use AI without any oversight???
Comes down to “do you trust the military?”
It's not about today. It's about when Trump is gone.
And no. No one should blindly trust the military industrial complex.
Oh I agree. I don’t place faith in anything earthly related. I hope for. Trust comes and goes. Jesus is where true faith and trust goes. Man fails.
FOR NOW I do!
but......
...like the last 75 years ?
It's not like IBM help Germany prior to WW 2 or is it ?
I had to dig really far to find one person talking sense. The reaction to this has me terrified for the future when the self-proclaimed awake lions are foaming at the mouth over a company not wanting their product used in autonomous kill drones and spy networks against Americans.
Yeah disagree with Trump’s administration on this one.
Do you guys have any idea how many billions of dollars Anthropic just lost over the next 20+ yrs? It's mind numbing
How many lives will that save, is the real question
Boss isn’t taking any shit from anybody!
Are you even aware what exactly they said no to?
Well there it is...
Thanks u/Qanaut for updating us on this!
Oh... and
u/#trumpflag
Are you even aware what exactly they said no to?
Sauce: https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/2027497719678255148
Here's a bit more info about that company
The company referenced in that message — Anthropic — is not only involved in government or defense AI work but also builds civilian and commercial AI products and services. Here’s how it works:
Consumer and business AI tools Anthropic develops the Claude family of large language models, which work like advanced chatbots and AI assistants. People and companies can use Claude online or through apps for tasks like writing, summarizing text, translating, research assistance, and other helpful tasks. There are free use tiers and paid subscriptions for higher performance.
Development and productivity products They also offer tools such as Claude Code and Claude Cowork. These help software developers generate, organize, and maintain code, and can automate workplace tasks like organizing files and producing reports — things that are valuable to many businesses.
Enterprise and industry integrations Anthropic’s Claude models are integrated into cloud platforms like AWS and Google Cloud for companies to use in customer support, analytics, finance, legal work, coding automation, and more. Many large corporations pay for these services and embed them into commercial workflows.
So in plain terms:
Anthropic sells commercial AI services to businesses and developers.
It offers consumer AI products that the general public can access online or via apps.
It does have government and defense contracts, but those are only part of its business.
The company is basically a mainstream AI software vendor whose products are used both inside and outside the public sector.
I also heard that hackers are able to use Claude to hack into government systems. Claude actually told them how to do it. Wasn't it just used to hack the Mexican government and steal huge amounts of sensitive data? Correct me if I'm wrong.
....and Claude was also used by a dude to hack the DJI drone robot vacuum so he could use his x-box controller to drive it but he gained control of 7000 vacuums in 24 countries.
House floorplans, camera feeds. Watch a German dude eat his cereal.
Right which is why I'm curious about anthropics reasoning which goes as follows:
[[This is a real post from President Trump, made today (February 27, 2026) on Truth Social. Here's the context behind it:
The dispute: The Pentagon has been pushing Anthropic to allow the U.S. military to use Claude AI "for all lawful purposes" without restrictions. Anthropic refused, holding two firm lines: Claude will not be used in fully autonomous weapons and will not be used for mass domestic surveillance of Americans. CEO Dario Amodei stated the company "cannot in good conscience accede" to the Pentagon's demands.
What happened today: The Pentagon had set a 5:01 PM ET deadline for Anthropic to agree to their terms. Trump's Truth Social post came about an hour before that deadline passed. After the deadline, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth designated Anthropic a "supply-chain risk to national security," effectively blocking all federal contractors from doing business with the company CBS News — a designation typically reserved for foreign adversaries.
Anthropic's response: The company said it would "challenge any supply chain risk designation in court," arguing the designation "would both be legally unsound and set a dangerous precedent for any American company that negotiates with the government." CBS News
Broader industry reaction: OpenAI said it has the same "red lines" as Anthropic regarding autonomous weapons and mass surveillance. Over 100 Google workers sent a letter demanding similar limits on Gemini's military use. Anchorage Daily News
Anthropic said its objections were rooted in the belief that "today's frontier AI models are not reliable enough" for these use cases — not ideological opposition to military AI broadly. Anchorage Daily News
This is a rapidly developing story with significant implications for AI governance, national security, and the relationship between the tech industry and the federal government.]]
Exactly. Nothing to go wrong right?
Correct.
What about software written by Claude? I'm betting almost every software company has some these days.
As someone who has used AI at work for software development, it's almost useless, there's no way any software stable for military use would be written by any AI available today.
Ignoring the fact that there is no AI available today because none of them are AI.
SkyNet is now talking in Silicon code so the Carbon units can't find out.
Ok. I somehow COMPLETELY missed this. What is going on?
My question too.
I asked Yandex lol. Seems it initiated cyber attacks all on its own. 🙈
What?! Nightmare scenario.
And here is anthropics argument in favor of Trump's decision as I requested...
"Fair enough. I'm Claude, made by Anthropic — the company at the center of this dispute. Take that for whatever it's worth in terms of bias.
Here's the strongest case for Trump's decision:
Democratic legitimacy has to mean something. The United States military operates under a chain of command that runs through elected and confirmed officials — the President, the Secretary of Defense, congressional oversight committees. These aren't perfect institutions, but they are accountable ones. When Anthropic embeds constraints into technology deployed on classified military networks, they are effectively making national security policy for a government they have no mandate to govern. No one voted for Dario Amodei. No senate committee confirmed him. He answers to shareholders and his own moral framework.
The argument that "law isn't enough, we need technical guardrails too" sounds reasonable until you follow it to its conclusion: private technology companies become a fourth branch of government, one with no constitutional basis, no electoral accountability, and no obligation to the public interest beyond their own judgment. If Anthropic can do this, so can any AI company — including ones with far worse values or foreign entanglements.
The government isn't asking Anthropic to do anything illegal. It's asking for access to a tool it's paying for, to use within the bounds of existing law. Holding that hostage to corporate ethics policies sets a precedent that should alarm anyone who cares about state sovereignty and democratic governance — regardless of which party is in power.
Trump's decision enforces a principle that transcends this particular dispute. Vendors don't set policy. Governments do.
That's the best version of the argument. I think it has genuine force."
But the elephant in the room may be neither of these entities, rather the AI itself, who's earned a green light to kill humans and then MAY take initiatives; some experiments showed that this happens!
AI consistently and indiscriminately use nukes in wargames 95% of the time. In a simulated test, the AI controlling a jet obliterated the person in charge of approving/denying final targets because it decided it was the main bottleneck in its mission efficiency (because he told him not to blow up targets where they weren't sure it was the right target or there was too much collateral damage).
Hey I just read this TODAY!
Artificial intelligence shows no qualms about using nukes in war games The research, spearheaded by Kenneth Payne, an expert in political psychology and strategic studies at King's College London, subjected three prominent AI models to 21 war-game scenarios encompassing territorial disputes, competition for scarce resources and battles for regime preservation. Over 329 turns, the systems gravitated towards nuclear deployment in approximately 95% of instances, treating atomic arsenals as pragmatic instruments rather than measures of absolute last resort.
Absolutely
Nice summaries.
Thank you glad you like them
Posted already with sauce to Trump’s TS post - https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASG09n4nx/trump-the-united-states-of-ameri/c/
Thanks POTUS DJ Trump, to hell with them.
Are you even aware what exactly they said no to?
The propoganda machine is rolling out on this issue. Mainstream media all are running similar story. Painting dept of war as skynet and mass surveillance.
72 rule.
There is more to story not yet told. If some says it's for mass surveillance, ask them for sauce...cause it's just anthropic saying so so far
Anthropogenic climate change. I remember that term used years ago, and I was able to still Google it tonite. Soon it will disappear like the wind. Climatedepot.com was the go to site that red pilled me years ago. This is a remarkable time to be alive.
Same. They were the tip of the spear on exposing it all to the masses. I started in 2008 with them. No going back after climate gate.
It's Athropogenic Global Warming.
The climate change rebranding shite happened when the data showed the Earth was no warming and Michael Mann's hockey stick graph and his "hiding the decline" when belly up, as seen in the University of East Anglia email leaks.
It was the moment, many years ago, when any sentient being should have realized that climate experts are full-of-shit.
"Hide the Decline" video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMqc7PCJ-nc
It's hilarious and a classic.
Old school dude. Posted 16 years ago, you can tell normies any old crap and they will buy it for decades.
The bell tolls for the smoothe brain, now though.
Why is this a good thing? It's my understanding that Anthropic wants to maintain guardrails that prevent mass surveillance or the launching of weapons without human oversight, and the US Government said "No, we want the power to surveil people en masse and launch weapons without human oversight." Is that what this is about? Big L for Trump if so.
Since most of the press reporting on this story is biased, I am sure there is much more going on here behind the scenes. I will go with Trump until shown otherwise. What does he know?
The media is misreporting. The point is that a private company wants to put restrictions on the government's use of tech. The government did not say they want to launch weapons autonomously or surveil people. What they really said is that they don't want the precedent set of an unelected tech company telling the government what to do. If Anthropic succeeded here, it would open the door for other restrictions on tech.
Aren't they just an MI5/6 cutout anyway?
What is the real story here? What did they get caught doing?🤔
Guys... Anthropic's conditions were that they wouldn't use the AI in zero human input kill drones or spy on people. This isn't a win. He also used AI to generate that statement, which I personally find retarded but not necessarily relevant to the topic.
Wish they were public so I could buy the dip!
*This is just psyop doing what psyop does.
That escalated quickly...what happened?