We are getting a lot of audio from places it's not supposed to be coming from (ie. Joe biden's presser that was interrupted by Hunter Biden accepting a plea deal). Something is definitely coming.
Listen to audio of hunter speaking "widely available" and then reference it to what you here. If it's not Hunter, who is it? Why is it cutting into the Presidents Presser? How often does that happen?
I’m all for the plan, but I think adamantly making this claim as though it’s fact is harmful. Countless instances of anons coming to false conclusions, which then reflects badly on the movement.
This is a perfect space for speculation, but I feel like you need to be more careful with making bold claims.
I agree. I don't think labeling every 13 second video clip of something odd should have the word "PROOF!" As part of the title.
Just provide as much context as you can and maybe offer another mainstream source to cross reference with. I understand they are liars. So if the mainstream source either has no audio, cuts out before the aid leans in, or just cuts out that few seconds all together, then you've got no other choice but to go with what we see here.
With that being said, when I saw the "inauguration" video I noticed how large her mask was and prior to that, I noticed pelosi's mask getting larger after her 4 day absence when she made those several remark at the podium and in the chambers. Her hair is different, her body proportions are different and her mannerisms are different as seen here and the inauguration video. So I do believe what I'm seeing here to be solid evidence (not PROOF) of a stand-in.
I agree, there’s plenty to be suspicious about. Plenty to look into. The footage of the inauguration with the 2 different sets of people in the background is very interesting.
I just think it does a disservice when people claim something is irrefutable PROOF, when there are literally dozens of other possible explanations.
You're skipping over the BIG though. True, we don't (yet) know that it is Hunter, though it sounds like him, but what the heck is going on with that voice? What about the topic? On the Official White House channel?
I agree, it is suspect. Also, I've never seen anything like that happen in all my years. I haven't watched too many political press conferences, but I've watched tons of sports press conferences and I've never seen that. I've watched a lot of speeches, and have never seen that.
Could have been an attorney or a judge. May even have been Hunter. Point is we DON'T KNOW and stating things like this with such certainly is one reason so many have earned the moniker, Qtard.
agreed. I think he says "settlement for a guy". it's not just about its reflection on the movement but we distract ourselves with it. it was absolutely worth looking into. we deboonked it together. let's move on together. we will prevail.
Listen to audio of Hunter. Then listen to this. If you disagree with my claim state why. I'm glad you're worried about optics, if you can't see, pretty much everyone hates us, and there are shills everywhere. Claiming this is Hunter Biden is peanuts to already existing posts regarding a fake white house, or Declass for bitcoin. Can't call it a false conclusion when you provide no evidence of your own. The movement will be fine regardless. If it's a perfect space for speculation, let me speculate and shut the fuck up (unless you have actual evidence). I'll post what I'd like whenever I like, thank you.
Don’t be a douche. It’s actually pretty easy to say “likely Hunter Biden speaking” instead of “Hunter Biden speaking”. If you’re not careful, you become no better than fake news
You're skipping over the BIG though. True, we don't (yet) know that it is Hunter, though it sounds like him, but what the heck is going on with that voice? What about the topic? On the Official White House channel?
Oh yeah, lots going on. For sure it's something there...just not Hunter Biden beyond a shadow of a doubt/absolute fact. It might be, and it sounds like him, but it could be a lot of people. I think we agree on that.
I’m on it dawg, thanks. Your comment was just fine until the end when you became unnecessarily belligerent. Same team yo. We have to be OK with receiving criticism.
I have. Don’t be such a defensive little cunt. If you’re so confident with your claims you wouldn’t be acting so insecure and defensive.
The reason I don’t buy into statements that it’s 100% hunter is because there is not enough evidence to prove it. You haven’t provided any analysis besides you opinion - which you have to admit is inherently bias. Have you provided any profession audio analysis? Any way to distinguish Hunter from someone who sounds similar to him? Literally any solid evidence except for your own personal opinion?
Could it be hunter? Yes. Does it sound like him? Kind of similar. Do you have enough evidence to claim irrefutably that it is in fact Hunter? Not by a fucking long shot pal.
Stop being such a little fucking bitch about it and step up your analysis.
Thinking of the mic that picked up that voice, what do you imagine that to be? Would Hunter be mic'd and someone accidentally turned that on? Is there a random mic out there somewhere he was sitting next to? I don't really have an opinion on if it's him or not, just helping strengthen this connection, if so. Considering the technical circumstances on how he got recorded is something worthwhile, imo.
I'm leaning more towards someones headset in the (video) control booth either purposefully or accidentally went hot over Biden's life feed.
Instead of a (hard) cut of the persons audio, it's a quick, but gradual fade out.
That leans to the likelihood of someone in the control booth manually doing that.
Whether it was simply an accident, or someone decided to "spill the beans live" when another person faded out their audio before the could finish a statement, who knows?
Ok yeah I was wondering if it could be a studio headset, but I wasn't sure if they were typically wired into the same audio system as the recording equipment.
I could definitely see family being in a studio watching things that way, instead of a wireless mic or something being out elsewhere that was heard.
If a lawyer was in the studio, it could also be a family or personal lawyer and not some rando lawyer.
I definitely see this (the recording coming from an audio/video control studio) as the most likely scenario given a studio headset is wired into the recording board. And yeah I could definitely see that if the studio needs to talk in a studio mix in someone's ear. Good call.
Perhaps a white hat should keep an eye on that audio engineer because they probably know what happened here.
That's kind of my focus here, trying to get that info out there! The problem I have is a lot of people who are either ignorant or have their own perception or perspective on it. People like me tend to have issues with that if we're not careful. I'd rather think the person on the other end did the recording because they don't have a problem with the way the other person recorded.
Typically in this kind of setup you have multiple mics (wireless, podium, etc.) wired into a soundboard that goes out to a recording / live feed. If someone accidentally bumped (or intentionally moved) the sound board volume fader for a mic input it could mix that sound into a recording.
Another way was it was picked up by Joe's podium mic but I think this is less likely depending on the mic used. I would assume a podium mic wouldn't be broadly omnidirectional which would allow people around it to be picked up and not just the one in front of it. I'm not an audio engineer, but I believe these kind of mics would be pretty focused to avoid picking up stray sounds.
edit: I know belive the most likely source was from an AV studio headset mic, where family/lawyers/ etc were watching.
It's most likely Xavier Becerra, the California AG, who was participating in the event remotely. Sounds like him. Would also explain somewhat what he's talking about. He's the AG. Was probably talking shop with an aide or was on the phone while waiting for his part in Biden's event. Somebody accidentally had the mic on, either on his end or the white house's end.
There is no way to know for sure that was Hunter Biden in that audio. I know people really want it to be, and I am not saying it definitely isn't, but we should stick to verifiable facts. It is the only way...
But, that pic was from his laptop among other images of Hunter. I saw the image and it was the back of his (or someones as you say) head. There is a lot more circumstantial evidence that would lead to that being Hunter. However I do agree that without the face or some other physical characteristic identifying him, we cannot say 100%.
The president is not law enforcement. He can tell the DoJ to act but if they do not then what? Fire everyone until someone does? That approach seems untenable.
That is the greater scope of what is happening and you know that is not what I was talking about. If we are going to argue points of note or interest, it is best to stick to what is verifiable.
I know everyone is waiting for the Military to save us. I will just point out that it was said that no one will believe how this ends. Or something that effect. The fact everyone expects the Military to do something tells me they are going to do nothing.
The other audio leaks have been more obvious. This one is odd to me. Doesn't seem legitimate. "Don't say nothing"... Would a federal agent say that with that phrasing?
Who is the woman who said "Don't say nothing"? The one getting her attention and directing her towards somewhere appears to be a Marshall, but she isn't bossing just pointing her towards where she needs to go.
Ok, let's say it's her bodyguard, why is she telling Nancy to say nothing? I would imagine that wouldn't be something a bodyguard would tell a Speaker of the House, get my drift?
Security personnel could give advice to help avoid security issues. If you trust someone to protect you, you would often take their advice on how to safely get to your destination.
There is so much crap that just doesn't make any sense at all. For me the big one is Biden being sworn in at 11:46. uhhh Trump (or any POTUS) is POTUS until 12:00 which is why the new POTUS is sworn in at 12:01.
Honest quest is it even legitimate because of this?
30k troops keeps you safe from an army, not a lone assassin. Personal bodyguards do that. (aka police / secret service / etc.) She was paranoid about infiltrators so much she had sworn National Guardsmen vetted just to be in DC.
Such a typical commie maneuver- an appeal to authority. That is a logical fallacy (not that you care about logic). Brainwashed lefties love their appeal to authority. "99% of scientists agree with global warming!" "Fauci says you should wear a mask!" But as usual, your kind is never consistent. The moment a scientist or doctor doesn't pantomime your dogma, you immediately smear them, attack their reputation, and if possible remove their license/professional credentials. Such self-destructive, anti-intellectual behavior- typical of the brainwashed among us such as yourself.
okay lets imagine this. Why would we not know about Nancy Pelosi being arrested by now? Its been a week? a little more? She is arrested, yet everyone in congress is saying nothing?
think about what is being moved around this place? US corporation, nuclear football (debunked), military in control (no proof), heerrrr durrrr Melania changed in AF1 on the way to Florida (somehow that's a conspiracy) and so on.
Perhaps the plan was to have the supreme court NOT FUCKING BACK STAB US, and it didn't work. The entire GOP has turned on Trump. Even if Trump pulled some batman move off, wtf is he coming back to? He doesn't have a majority, RINOs everywhere. I mean come on man.
That’s the entire purpose of us coming to this forum my man. To discuss if there’s a plan and to piece things together that might be part of the plan. Maybe there’s a perfectly reasonable explanation for this video, but that’s what we’re here to discuss.
Remember how hot and bothered Piglosi got when Wolf dared to question her? The "guard" here is ordering her to keep her mouth shut. I would say she is NOT personal security.
I believe in that one picture it cuts to, there's a in depth breakdown of the image someone posted at an earlier time. The zoom went on the badge the blonde lady was wearing and cross compared a US Marshal badge (looked fairly close albiet blurry), but secondly the when Pelosi was walking earlier with the group of women (yes I assumed the gender), it was pointed at that if it were something of an investigation or where a search may be necessary they would use similarly gendered law enforcement officials (however this part is more speculation than fact as far as I know)
Can you offer evidence that it's normal? It would seem to me that she is the one who hires the press officer and therefore she is the one who is in charge. She's not a child. This feels backwards
She doesn't have a press "officer", she has an assistant, Stephanie Wong who looks like a dude. And He wasn't there just those two Marshalls. The Feds were all over that building all along the back wall.
It would be nice if we had access to FBI tools like facial recognition technology, we could probably find out if that blonde woman is a lawyer pretty quick.
It could also mean avoiding conversation which could open you up to stopping and a possible security incident. If you are escorting from A to B, anything that pops up in-between is often unwelcome.
Funny thing is this am I watched a video of Biden walking up the stairs to listen to this segment that came right after him saying "Salute the Guards" aloud and noticed they had already edited out him saying it. You tube is already cleaning up the gaffes.
There is ZERO context to this. Could she be under arrest/investigation? Maybe? This provides no proof of it whatsoever and it's so bad it makes me believe she's not.
Edit: Why do false sources and crap like this keep getting stickied?
I can tell you something is fishy. Piglosi never goes anywhere without her assistant. Those two 'women', for the sake of gender, act like Fed Cops, aka Marshalls.
There are shills on here trying to make people think something is happening that isn't. I believe in there being a plan, but putting up obviously fake videos and saying people are disappearing from the inauguration videos that aren't is just silly. They're hoping we will read their post and not watch the video or something...i'm about to leave this site if mods keep stickying fake accounts and LARPs.
Okay, gameplay how a Speaker of the House can go into congress and advocate for the senate to impeach Trump while being under arrest by the US Marshalls.
Looking for a logical argument how these things can exist and are more probable that she's not under some kind of mobile arrest but merely protected by security for this event because she was paranoid about insurrectionists.
You're using hyperbolic wording here, I never attacked you. I questioned whether or not she's "fucked" if she can be at apparent liberty to go after Trump without any apparent constraint in Congress. "Don't say nothing" can mean nearly anything.
Technically yes... the double negative in that sentence implies to say everything... but the way don’t say nothing is said just sounds like a stronger position
To be fair, I saw this in voat every day. We had plenty of shills spreading false information like the tunnels in new york when they erected the covid tents were an undercover operation where they rescued children who couldn't breathe above ground without ventilators.....
There's more here due to the newbies being unhardened yet but alot of old timers pushed those stories for awhile and only a few called it out.
That is true. I was just saying I had to sift through heavy layers of silt to find the gold in voat. It is the same here in a different way as you stated
This isn’t “proof” by any means but it is certainly something worth noting. Considering there were pictures/video of her last week being escorted by women who appeared to have US Marshall badges makes this more notable.
If it happens a third and a fourth time, then there is a clear pattern and would strongly support the theory that she may be under custody of US Marshalls.
This is what we’re all about! Connecting all the crumbs to figure out what the hell is actually going on!
Read through the comments and A LOT of people seem unable to piece together what happened here, so allow me to explain:
The black woman that comes on-screen from the left, in the beginning, is Law Enforcement. Earlier this week, someone posted a picture of Nancy with this same woman and a few other female Law Enforcement. Anons looked at the badges and, while blurry, most concluded it is a U.S. Marshall badge. The person that made this video cut to that picture to show you that the black woman who enters from the left side of the screen, and the black woman in the picture of female LEOs flanking Pelosi, are the same person. This is how we know the black woman in the video is a LEO. She raises her hand and gestures, sternly, for Nancy to approach her.
Then, the video cuts Nancy and someone walks up to her and says, "Don't say anything" to which Nancy replies, "I won't." The woman that walked up to Nancy could be anyone, but it seems like she is probably legal counsel, a close aide, or at least a close confidant.
What this seems to depict is a LEO telling Nancy to come over to her and someone close to Nancy, perhaps even legal counsel, advising her not to say anything and a shaken Nancy confirms she won't. This is the type of advice legal counsel would give a client before being questioned.
I know the video wasn't edited, because I watched the original version of it this morning. Hope this helps. If I missed anything, let me know and I will edit the post accordingly.
SPEZ 1: Remember that Nancy abdicated her role as Speaker every day since January 11th. Check House logs. She has had someone fill in for her every day, including the days when the house brought the most recent impeachment articles to the house floor.
SPEZ 2: A group of female U.S. Marshalls have been seen following Pelosi around for over a week. To my knowledge, USMS does not provide day to day security for lawmakers. If this is incorrect, please correct me with proof to the contrary. According to the www.federallawenforcement.org, this is a list of their roles:
The USMS is responsible for protecting our judicial process by:
Providing federal judiciary security
Apprehending fugitives
Apprehending non-compliant sex offenders
Securing and transporting federal prisoners
Executing federal court orders
Seizing and managing assets that were obtained illegally
Providing safety to endangered government witnesses and their families
You people are jumping the shark. She might have said that to remind Pelosi of the cameras and mics and not to say anything. People are saying body guards don't boss you around but that's utter bullshit. Their job is to protect you from everything not just bullets. That means the SS even bosses POTUS around. Sure they are respectful but when they say "Mr President this way." Its not a suggestion. POTUS has to forcefully override that order or do as he's told, by the professionals.
Also in another thread someone took a pic of the badges these woman are wearing and blew them up. ZERO doubt in my mind they were Capital Police Detective Badges. This is just Pelosi's protective detail. She's freaking Speaker. That means she's 2nd in line for POTUS behind Kamala.
The freaking Majority whip had a protective detail at a baseball game. You seriously believe a week after the Capital was attacked and with all hell breaking lose Pelosi wouldn't have a beefed up detail and they wouldn't be all super serious/anal??? Next you will be telling me petty bureaucratic tyrants in government never ever abuse their power.
Please stop chasing ghosts down rabbit holes. Think logically. You people are being emotional. You are desperate for them not to be in power and look for any way to justify that desperate need.
I wonder if there are trials already going on and they are hiding it from the public. I’m sure if it came to that, we wouldn’t be able to watch it live, because there would be sensitive info that couldn’t be disclosed to the public. Just a wishful thought maybe.
Is that SS? Is it her council? Chief of staff? Do we know who this lady is? Are we even sure that is Nancy? Could easily be a body double and her handler is making sure she doesn’t give her self away. This could really be dozens of scenarios other than the the one the title if this post asserted
First, visit https://live.house.gov/?date=2021-01-11 & see that she did not preside as speaker over the impeachment and any real house activity since Jan 11.
Then look at rules for what someone who has been indicted is supposed to do.
"Internal party rules in the House, however, require an indicted chairman or ranking Member of a House committee, or a member of the House party leadership, to temporarily step aside from his or her leadership or chairmanship position."
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33229.pdf
Sorry, but this isn't proof of anything other than a U.S. Marshall telling someone to not say anything. Could literally be about anything. Need more sauce. Bread's still too dry.
By "totally different outfits", what do you mean? If you mean the black dress part of the clip, I think that's just a reference point to show who the black US marshal is. And then with her walking toward the marshal, it looks like she's in a blue overcoat but you can't see her dress under it really. There's the scarf but I don't know if it's part of her outfit or for warmth?
I listened to it several times, you could be right, it's very hard to tell with masks on funny enough. Geez another reason they love wearing masks, we can't read their lips and what they might be saying.
I remember on the CSPAN live stream after the Inaguration I heard them like talk about serious things and when they came by the camera would ssay super weirdly normal stuff like "Oh what a beautiful even" I specifically heard HRC say " How the project in Africa?" I head a lot of weird shit on the real unedited version of the inaguation of CSPAN. CSPAN had a lot of good live footage.
i love this type of stuff as much as the next guy, but who is the other lady? Just going by the one phrase: "dont say nothing" she could be a lawyer, a PR person, any type of handler or DNC image consultant
We are getting a lot of audio from places it's not supposed to be coming from (ie. Joe biden's presser that was interrupted by Hunter Biden accepting a plea deal). Something is definitely coming.
Do you have proof that was Hunter? I am hearing different accounts of that.
Listen to audio of hunter speaking "widely available" and then reference it to what you here. If it's not Hunter, who is it? Why is it cutting into the Presidents Presser? How often does that happen?
That's Hunter biden.
I’m all for the plan, but I think adamantly making this claim as though it’s fact is harmful. Countless instances of anons coming to false conclusions, which then reflects badly on the movement.
This is a perfect space for speculation, but I feel like you need to be more careful with making bold claims.
I agree. I don't think labeling every 13 second video clip of something odd should have the word "PROOF!" As part of the title.
Just provide as much context as you can and maybe offer another mainstream source to cross reference with. I understand they are liars. So if the mainstream source either has no audio, cuts out before the aid leans in, or just cuts out that few seconds all together, then you've got no other choice but to go with what we see here.
With that being said, when I saw the "inauguration" video I noticed how large her mask was and prior to that, I noticed pelosi's mask getting larger after her 4 day absence when she made those several remark at the podium and in the chambers. Her hair is different, her body proportions are different and her mannerisms are different as seen here and the inauguration video. So I do believe what I'm seeing here to be solid evidence (not PROOF) of a stand-in.
I agree, there’s plenty to be suspicious about. Plenty to look into. The footage of the inauguration with the 2 different sets of people in the background is very interesting.
I just think it does a disservice when people claim something is irrefutable PROOF, when there are literally dozens of other possible explanations.
Well said.
You're skipping over the BIG though. True, we don't (yet) know that it is Hunter, though it sounds like him, but what the heck is going on with that voice? What about the topic? On the Official White House channel?
Don't lose the obvious.
Have you ever worked in audio/visual? There are lots of legitimate explanations for why that could have happened.
Here’s a link to a thread discussing some considerations, or alternative theories. https://greatawakening.win/p/11SJt9gqgK/can-we-please-clear-up-who-was-t/
Regardless of who was speaking over Joe, it was rhen content that got me. A plea deal, really?
I agree, it is suspect. Also, I've never seen anything like that happen in all my years. I haven't watched too many political press conferences, but I've watched tons of sports press conferences and I've never seen that. I've watched a lot of speeches, and have never seen that.
Could have been an attorney or a judge. May even have been Hunter. Point is we DON'T KNOW and stating things like this with such certainly is one reason so many have earned the moniker, Qtard.
agreed. I think he says "settlement for a guy". it's not just about its reflection on the movement but we distract ourselves with it. it was absolutely worth looking into. we deboonked it together. let's move on together. we will prevail.
It is an opinion, like every one has one. If you want proof you gonna have to find some kind of voice analysis and see if it matches Hunter.
Listen to audio of Hunter. Then listen to this. If you disagree with my claim state why. I'm glad you're worried about optics, if you can't see, pretty much everyone hates us, and there are shills everywhere. Claiming this is Hunter Biden is peanuts to already existing posts regarding a fake white house, or Declass for bitcoin. Can't call it a false conclusion when you provide no evidence of your own. The movement will be fine regardless. If it's a perfect space for speculation, let me speculate and shut the fuck up (unless you have actual evidence). I'll post what I'd like whenever I like, thank you.
Don’t be a douche. It’s actually pretty easy to say “likely Hunter Biden speaking” instead of “Hunter Biden speaking”. If you’re not careful, you become no better than fake news
As I said above,
You're skipping over the BIG though. True, we don't (yet) know that it is Hunter, though it sounds like him, but what the heck is going on with that voice? What about the topic? On the Official White House channel?
Don't lose the obvious.
Oh yeah, lots going on. For sure it's something there...just not Hunter Biden beyond a shadow of a doubt/absolute fact. It might be, and it sounds like him, but it could be a lot of people. I think we agree on that.
I’m on it dawg, thanks. Your comment was just fine until the end when you became unnecessarily belligerent. Same team yo. We have to be OK with receiving criticism.
I hear what you're saying but the burden of proof is on you.
I think it sounds like hunter biden. But I can't prove it. Need to run through a voice analyzer and we may get closer to being positive
I have. Don’t be such a defensive little cunt. If you’re so confident with your claims you wouldn’t be acting so insecure and defensive. The reason I don’t buy into statements that it’s 100% hunter is because there is not enough evidence to prove it. You haven’t provided any analysis besides you opinion - which you have to admit is inherently bias. Have you provided any profession audio analysis? Any way to distinguish Hunter from someone who sounds similar to him? Literally any solid evidence except for your own personal opinion? Could it be hunter? Yes. Does it sound like him? Kind of similar. Do you have enough evidence to claim irrefutably that it is in fact Hunter? Not by a fucking long shot pal. Stop being such a little fucking bitch about it and step up your analysis.
Omfg. Boo fucking hoo. You’re such an insufferable little bitch. You play the victim and project so hard, you could be a top mind of reddit.
So you’re saying this place isn’t for rational thinking? You give the Q movement a bad name.
Infiltration? Subversion? I see what you’re doing. Maybe some ppl fall for your shit but I see you.
SMH
He was being totally civil and cordial to you. How about YOU shut the fuck up?
yeah ... fuk bro please share that link if you have it. If you don't its tots cool .. I lose 80% of the links I should be keeping.
Thinking of the mic that picked up that voice, what do you imagine that to be? Would Hunter be mic'd and someone accidentally turned that on? Is there a random mic out there somewhere he was sitting next to? I don't really have an opinion on if it's him or not, just helping strengthen this connection, if so. Considering the technical circumstances on how he got recorded is something worthwhile, imo.
I'm leaning more towards someones headset in the (video) control booth either purposefully or accidentally went hot over Biden's life feed.
Instead of a (hard) cut of the persons audio, it's a quick, but gradual fade out.
That leans to the likelihood of someone in the control booth manually doing that.
Whether it was simply an accident, or someone decided to "spill the beans live" when another person faded out their audio before the could finish a statement, who knows?
That's my take from someone in the industry.
Ok yeah I was wondering if it could be a studio headset, but I wasn't sure if they were typically wired into the same audio system as the recording equipment.
I could definitely see family being in a studio watching things that way, instead of a wireless mic or something being out elsewhere that was heard.
If a lawyer was in the studio, it could also be a family or personal lawyer and not some rando lawyer.
I definitely see this (the recording coming from an audio/video control studio) as the most likely scenario given a studio headset is wired into the recording board. And yeah I could definitely see that if the studio needs to talk in a studio mix in someone's ear. Good call.
Perhaps a white hat should keep an eye on that audio engineer because they probably know what happened here.
That's kind of my focus here, trying to get that info out there! The problem I have is a lot of people who are either ignorant or have their own perception or perspective on it. People like me tend to have issues with that if we're not careful. I'd rather think the person on the other end did the recording because they don't have a problem with the way the other person recorded.
Typically in this kind of setup you have multiple mics (wireless, podium, etc.) wired into a soundboard that goes out to a recording / live feed. If someone accidentally bumped (or intentionally moved) the sound board volume fader for a mic input it could mix that sound into a recording. Another way was it was picked up by Joe's podium mic but I think this is less likely depending on the mic used. I would assume a podium mic wouldn't be broadly omnidirectional which would allow people around it to be picked up and not just the one in front of it. I'm not an audio engineer, but I believe these kind of mics would be pretty focused to avoid picking up stray sounds.
edit: I know belive the most likely source was from an AV studio headset mic, where family/lawyers/ etc were watching.
It's most likely Xavier Becerra, the California AG, who was participating in the event remotely. Sounds like him. Would also explain somewhat what he's talking about. He's the AG. Was probably talking shop with an aide or was on the phone while waiting for his part in Biden's event. Somebody accidentally had the mic on, either on his end or the white house's end.
There is no way to know for sure that was Hunter Biden in that audio. I know people really want it to be, and I am not saying it definitely isn't, but we should stick to verifiable facts. It is the only way...
But, that pic was from his laptop among other images of Hunter. I saw the image and it was the back of his (or someones as you say) head. There is a lot more circumstantial evidence that would lead to that being Hunter. However I do agree that without the face or some other physical characteristic identifying him, we cannot say 100%.
The president is not law enforcement. He can tell the DoJ to act but if they do not then what? Fire everyone until someone does? That approach seems untenable.
That is the greater scope of what is happening and you know that is not what I was talking about. If we are going to argue points of note or interest, it is best to stick to what is verifiable.
I know everyone is waiting for the Military to save us. I will just point out that it was said that no one will believe how this ends. Or something that effect. The fact everyone expects the Military to do something tells me they are going to do nothing.
I just read on another post that is was lawyer who was saying he had accepted a plea deal for a client. So...IDK
Xavier Beccera
I do trust the plan. I have been for almost 3 years.
Still... do you have proof it was Hunter?
"It sounds like Hunter" doesn't cut it.
It was Xavier Beccera
so how do you know that?
because I listened to a video of him talking and it sounds EXACTLY like him
show me a Q drop that states any of those events are supposed to happen? I'll wait.
Re: flynn. Someone asked when it would be over. Q said: Done in 30. 30 months + 2 days later, it was officially over.
Do your own research like everybody else. I'm not here to confirm Q drops for you.
Will hunter Biden salute the marines xD
Somebody told me that was not Hunter Biden but rather the CA Attorney General
Not a lawyer. Lawyers do not use legal terms this way.
True that
The other audio leaks have been more obvious. This one is odd to me. Doesn't seem legitimate. "Don't say nothing"... Would a federal agent say that with that phrasing?
I was very skeptical, I thought it would be very easy to over-impose sound like that.
I found the original video, and it's true, you can hear and see the same.
https://youtu.be/ZwvbQR887W0?t=12620
At 3:30:20
What do you guys think?
How can we confirm these are U.S. Marshalls and not her normal bodyguards is what I’m thinking.
Bodyguards you hire don't boss you around.
They they do if they're secretly your Chinese handler
Who is the woman who said "Don't say nothing"? The one getting her attention and directing her towards somewhere appears to be a Marshall, but she isn't bossing just pointing her towards where she needs to go.
She could be the blond from the potential "in custody" still frame in the video. Masks are fucking all this up.
Ok, let's say it's her bodyguard, why is she telling Nancy to say nothing? I would imagine that wouldn't be something a bodyguard would tell a Speaker of the House, get my drift?
More like a lawyer saying to their arrested client
Security personnel could give advice to help avoid security issues. If you trust someone to protect you, you would often take their advice on how to safely get to your destination.
She's basically telling Pelosi to shut the hell up and Pelosi acquiesces. That isn't how security gives advice on how to get safely to a destination.
There is so much crap that just doesn't make any sense at all. For me the big one is Biden being sworn in at 11:46. uhhh Trump (or any POTUS) is POTUS until 12:00 which is why the new POTUS is sworn in at 12:01. Honest quest is it even legitimate because of this?
Two presidents
this has bugged me ever since.
30k troops keeps you safe from an army, not a lone assassin. Personal bodyguards do that. (aka police / secret service / etc.) She was paranoid about infiltrators so much she had sworn National Guardsmen vetted just to be in DC.
Are you a security professional? Interested in the foundation of your assertion.
Was this talk from Pelosi today? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0gMmvhqMKs
I don't need to be one to know that was bullshit. Don't be stupid.
Ok dude.
Such a typical commie maneuver- an appeal to authority. That is a logical fallacy (not that you care about logic). Brainwashed lefties love their appeal to authority. "99% of scientists agree with global warming!" "Fauci says you should wear a mask!" But as usual, your kind is never consistent. The moment a scientist or doctor doesn't pantomime your dogma, you immediately smear them, attack their reputation, and if possible remove their license/professional credentials. Such self-destructive, anti-intellectual behavior- typical of the brainwashed among us such as yourself.
This was highly amusing, thanks for the laugh.
okay lets imagine this. Why would we not know about Nancy Pelosi being arrested by now? Its been a week? a little more? She is arrested, yet everyone in congress is saying nothing?
Well if a plan is truly happening, and if we are truly watching a movie, part of their deal might be to play along to avoid the death penalty.
did you ever consider that there might not be a plan?
"If," "truly," two words in my response that indicated I've considered there might not be a plan.
think about what is being moved around this place? US corporation, nuclear football (debunked), military in control (no proof), heerrrr durrrr Melania changed in AF1 on the way to Florida (somehow that's a conspiracy) and so on.
Perhaps the plan was to have the supreme court NOT FUCKING BACK STAB US, and it didn't work. The entire GOP has turned on Trump. Even if Trump pulled some batman move off, wtf is he coming back to? He doesn't have a majority, RINOs everywhere. I mean come on man.
That’s the entire purpose of us coming to this forum my man. To discuss if there’s a plan and to piece things together that might be part of the plan. Maybe there’s a perfectly reasonable explanation for this video, but that’s what we’re here to discuss.
Totally. Let’s do some digging!
Remember how hot and bothered Piglosi got when Wolf dared to question her? The "guard" here is ordering her to keep her mouth shut. I would say she is NOT personal security.
I believe in that one picture it cuts to, there's a in depth breakdown of the image someone posted at an earlier time. The zoom went on the badge the blonde lady was wearing and cross compared a US Marshal badge (looked fairly close albiet blurry), but secondly the when Pelosi was walking earlier with the group of women (yes I assumed the gender), it was pointed at that if it were something of an investigation or where a search may be necessary they would use similarly gendered law enforcement officials (however this part is more speculation than fact as far as I know)
I think she's her press officer. It's normal for a press officer to whisper things like these.
Hope she isn't of course.
Just curious where do you see badges on them? I tried looking but the one lady had an overcoat on.
Can you offer evidence that it's normal? It would seem to me that she is the one who hires the press officer and therefore she is the one who is in charge. She's not a child. This feels backwards
She doesn't have a press "officer", she has an assistant, Stephanie Wong who looks like a dude. And He wasn't there just those two Marshalls. The Feds were all over that building all along the back wall.
It would be nice if we had access to FBI tools like facial recognition technology, we could probably find out if that blonde woman is a lawyer pretty quick.
How can we be sure it was Nancy and the Marshall's voices?
I think it means “the protocol is to enter, take position and no conversations until after”. I want to believe, but need more context.
It could also mean avoiding conversation which could open you up to stopping and a possible security incident. If you are escorting from A to B, anything that pops up in-between is often unwelcome.
You don't think Pelosi knows the protocol? She's been in DC literally her entire life.
Those two are not her assistants. They are too "cop" acting.
Thanks for digging that up.
Funny thing is this am I watched a video of Biden walking up the stairs to listen to this segment that came right after him saying "Salute the Guards" aloud and noticed they had already edited out him saying it. You tube is already cleaning up the gaffes.
https://rumble.com/vd3vp3-does-biden-have-an-ear-piece.html
I thought he was just talking to his wife - someone who wouldn't think to salute the Marines.
Well if that were true why didn't he salute them either?
There is ZERO context to this. Could she be under arrest/investigation? Maybe? This provides no proof of it whatsoever and it's so bad it makes me believe she's not. Edit: Why do false sources and crap like this keep getting stickied?
It's not looked upon as proof for most people. It's simply yet another possible irregularity to ponder and put in one's pocket.
Seems to me many of you complaining don't understand what this is all about.
Doesn't help that the video is titled as, "Proof"
I can tell you something is fishy. Piglosi never goes anywhere without her assistant. Those two 'women', for the sake of gender, act like Fed Cops, aka Marshalls.
Very good question. I want them all to be locked up but this nonsense is not evidence. Bring the downvotes.
There are shills on here trying to make people think something is happening that isn't. I believe in there being a plan, but putting up obviously fake videos and saying people are disappearing from the inauguration videos that aren't is just silly. They're hoping we will read their post and not watch the video or something...i'm about to leave this site if mods keep stickying fake accounts and LARPs.
Either arrested by the good guys or protected by the bad guys.
This definitely doesn't tell us which.
That's a mental image I could have gone without
I don't think these creatures engage in what we call sex, ergo, it's not possible to imagine it :)
Is she? She's talking here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0gMmvhqMKs
Okay, gameplay how a Speaker of the House can go into congress and advocate for the senate to impeach Trump while being under arrest by the US Marshalls.
Looking for a logical argument how these things can exist and are more probable that she's not under some kind of mobile arrest but merely protected by security for this event because she was paranoid about insurrectionists.
You're using hyperbolic wording here, I never attacked you. I questioned whether or not she's "fucked" if she can be at apparent liberty to go after Trump without any apparent constraint in Congress. "Don't say nothing" can mean nearly anything.
Wtf! It should be “don’t say anything” reeeeee! What stupid law enforcement do we have!
(Sarcasm....sorry)
Don't say nothing would be .. say something?
Technically yes... the double negative in that sentence implies to say everything... but the way don’t say nothing is said just sounds like a stronger position
To be fair, I saw this in voat every day. We had plenty of shills spreading false information like the tunnels in new york when they erected the covid tents were an undercover operation where they rescued children who couldn't breathe above ground without ventilators.....
There's more here due to the newbies being unhardened yet but alot of old timers pushed those stories for awhile and only a few called it out.
That is true. I was just saying I had to sift through heavy layers of silt to find the gold in voat. It is the same here in a different way as you stated
This isn’t “proof” by any means but it is certainly something worth noting. Considering there were pictures/video of her last week being escorted by women who appeared to have US Marshall badges makes this more notable.
If it happens a third and a fourth time, then there is a clear pattern and would strongly support the theory that she may be under custody of US Marshalls.
This is what we’re all about! Connecting all the crumbs to figure out what the hell is actually going on!
Yeah isn’t there like thousands of contexts that we could apply this with and have it make sense, my goodness...
Pelosi says "I won't"? What is the context of the convo? More video?
That's all we have.
it sounded more like another voice likely the woman next to her.
This may be correct. Sometimes the simplest answer is the best.
Read through the comments and A LOT of people seem unable to piece together what happened here, so allow me to explain:
The black woman that comes on-screen from the left, in the beginning, is Law Enforcement. Earlier this week, someone posted a picture of Nancy with this same woman and a few other female Law Enforcement. Anons looked at the badges and, while blurry, most concluded it is a U.S. Marshall badge. The person that made this video cut to that picture to show you that the black woman who enters from the left side of the screen, and the black woman in the picture of female LEOs flanking Pelosi, are the same person. This is how we know the black woman in the video is a LEO. She raises her hand and gestures, sternly, for Nancy to approach her.
Then, the video cuts Nancy and someone walks up to her and says, "Don't say anything" to which Nancy replies, "I won't." The woman that walked up to Nancy could be anyone, but it seems like she is probably legal counsel, a close aide, or at least a close confidant.
What this seems to depict is a LEO telling Nancy to come over to her and someone close to Nancy, perhaps even legal counsel, advising her not to say anything and a shaken Nancy confirms she won't. This is the type of advice legal counsel would give a client before being questioned.
I know the video wasn't edited, because I watched the original version of it this morning. Hope this helps. If I missed anything, let me know and I will edit the post accordingly.
SPEZ 1: Remember that Nancy abdicated her role as Speaker every day since January 11th. Check House logs. She has had someone fill in for her every day, including the days when the house brought the most recent impeachment articles to the house floor.
SPEZ 2: A group of female U.S. Marshalls have been seen following Pelosi around for over a week. To my knowledge, USMS does not provide day to day security for lawmakers. If this is incorrect, please correct me with proof to the contrary. According to the www.federallawenforcement.org, this is a list of their roles:
https://www.federallawenforcement.org/us-marshal/what-is-a-us-marshal/
Where are the logs you are referring to for the House?
Who’s the gal telling her not to say nothing? U.S. Marshall, assistant, lawyer?
Karen
It's a valid question.
"I won't" did not sound like a powerful leader.
It sounded like a scared shitless old woman.
I heard that tone as well. Kinda like when Elena Parent was trying to convince the hearing chairman that GA had no election fraud
You people are jumping the shark. She might have said that to remind Pelosi of the cameras and mics and not to say anything. People are saying body guards don't boss you around but that's utter bullshit. Their job is to protect you from everything not just bullets. That means the SS even bosses POTUS around. Sure they are respectful but when they say "Mr President this way." Its not a suggestion. POTUS has to forcefully override that order or do as he's told, by the professionals.
Also in another thread someone took a pic of the badges these woman are wearing and blew them up. ZERO doubt in my mind they were Capital Police Detective Badges. This is just Pelosi's protective detail. She's freaking Speaker. That means she's 2nd in line for POTUS behind Kamala.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Congressional_baseball_shooting
The freaking Majority whip had a protective detail at a baseball game. You seriously believe a week after the Capital was attacked and with all hell breaking lose Pelosi wouldn't have a beefed up detail and they wouldn't be all super serious/anal??? Next you will be telling me petty bureaucratic tyrants in government never ever abuse their power.
Please stop chasing ghosts down rabbit holes. Think logically. You people are being emotional. You are desperate for them not to be in power and look for any way to justify that desperate need.
I wonder if there are trials already going on and they are hiding it from the public. I’m sure if it came to that, we wouldn’t be able to watch it live, because there would be sensitive info that couldn’t be disclosed to the public. Just a wishful thought maybe.
Or so it seems. Keep in mind the movie theory
Not dooming. How is this proof? Seriously.
Is that SS? Is it her council? Chief of staff? Do we know who this lady is? Are we even sure that is Nancy? Could easily be a body double and her handler is making sure she doesn’t give her self away. This could really be dozens of scenarios other than the the one the title if this post asserted
nobody said that it was proof. What it is, is weird. When have you seen SS order the speaker of the house to shutup?
“Don’t say nothing.”
“I won’t.”
“That is something.”
“What?”
“I said shut up, Nancy!”
“What did I say?!”
“You’re saying it right now!”
“Oh oh ok. Zipping my lip.”
“I said shut up.”
“Throwing away the key. Goodbye key.”
“Nancy.”
“There it goes. Not another word from me.”
“I mean it, Nancy.”
“Not... one... more... word.”
More evidence she was indicted and arrested is how she transferred over the spearkership duties during the impeachment.
I bet it pained her to call the other women "Madam Speaker"
Could you elaborate a little more on this allegation? Could you provide some data for this? Serious questions
First, visit https://live.house.gov/?date=2021-01-11 & see that she did not preside as speaker over the impeachment and any real house activity since Jan 11.
Then look at rules for what someone who has been indicted is supposed to do. "Internal party rules in the House, however, require an indicted chairman or ranking Member of a House committee, or a member of the House party leadership, to temporarily step aside from his or her leadership or chairmanship position." https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33229.pdf
Not when it comes to Impeachment votes.
THE STRONGEST HOPIUM I HAVE EVER HAD SO FAR!!
Sorry, but this isn't proof of anything other than a U.S. Marshall telling someone to not say anything. Could literally be about anything. Need more sauce. Bread's still too dry.
“Don’t say nothing?” Pretty poor grammar from a lawyer.
That’s her outfit from the “inauguration”. It also looks like the same US Marshals that were surrounding her in a previous picture.
By "totally different outfits", what do you mean? If you mean the black dress part of the clip, I think that's just a reference point to show who the black US marshal is. And then with her walking toward the marshal, it looks like she's in a blue overcoat but you can't see her dress under it really. There's the scarf but I don't know if it's part of her outfit or for warmth?
yeah different days but those officers could be her escort
Is it possible that Nancy is being controlled by 17 and let them continue acting? Hmm... interesting theory.
Listen to it a few times. Seems like that’s definitely what is being said but I have no clue why.
You know she was stone cold busted when her laptop and desktop went missing while outlook was still open on her email account.
Sounds like the Witch is being told to shut the fuck up by the "REAL" Authority! No more ice cream for you!
Sounded like Piglosi said "Dont saying anything". To me it sounded like her voice instructing the blonde.
I listened to it several times, you could be right, it's very hard to tell with masks on funny enough. Geez another reason they love wearing masks, we can't read their lips and what they might be saying.
Yep. Helps when you peaceful protest a Nike or Best Buy store too!
I remember on the CSPAN live stream after the Inaguration I heard them like talk about serious things and when they came by the camera would ssay super weirdly normal stuff like "Oh what a beautiful even" I specifically heard HRC say " How the project in Africa?" I head a lot of weird shit on the real unedited version of the inaguation of CSPAN. CSPAN had a lot of good live footage.
i love this type of stuff as much as the next guy, but who is the other lady? Just going by the one phrase: "dont say nothing" she could be a lawyer, a PR person, any type of handler or DNC image consultant
Her handler is her assistant and she who looks like a he wasn't there.
OMG those are US Marshalls! The peach blouse chick has a gold badge with an eagle on top. That's the new US Marshall Badges! Holy Shit Pedes
Reminded me of that ghost story documentary when the ghost busters play a recording of a ghost talking to them....?
We will all soon know what is really going on behind the stage....! ?
WWG1WGA
Shes fucked. Cant say I dont blame her... SKANK
I saw this yesterday and I have read posts since wed that Nancy was with Marshall's. I think I noted her body didn't look like her.
Coincidence? https://twitter.com/laurenboebert/status/1352362625196314631
Actually 17 sec
There's no context, at all. "Don't say nothing. I won't." Does in no way mean she's being arrested ffs