It'd be awesome if we eventually see some of the Operation Mockingbird creators in court describing the algorithm, how long it's been around, who it was deployed to, etc.
I no longer even look at Google, FB, Twitter, etc. as private companies. They are cabal/gov entities.
I don't think we'll see any more Q posts. We have probably everything we need at this point. I would give my left nut for all of it to go down but I think we're getting there
Since I don't have one, I'd give my husband's left testicle for the same. We're done having babies. Also, I hope every single one of us booted for our views join this and get a piece of the pie
I say Kill Google, YouTube, Twitter outright. Just end them.
It would be unpopular with the normies to simply end Facebook, so I don't know how you deal with them. Many people have decades of family pictures and keep track of friends and family using it.
There's no reason it can't be run as a utility, kind of like the post office. Especially since it was created with taxpayer money to begin with. Just get rid of tracking and ads, and it would be a decent piece of useful infrastructure, with most of the sunk costs already taken care of.
Also, nobody should be leaving their only source of photos on an online platform, that's not smart at all.
I would guess that over 95% of people do not keep their own photos on local storage, and throw it away when they get a new phone. That's just the reality of it.
Do away with Twatter and FaceDick, but just clean up YouTube. I would hate to go back to life with out all of the “how to” videos. I can build a house, replace the engine in my truck, make awesome carne asada tacos (shout-out to Sam the Cooking Guy) all because of YouTube.
and a lot of sheeple have their lively hoods online through google, youtube and twitter (gamers for one example) ... i don't see them just ending them, although it would be nice
Holy cow! I completely missed this (taken from drop #830):
WHO wrote the singular censorship algorithm?
WHO deployed the algorithm?
WHO instructed them to deploy the algorithm?
SAME embed across multiple platforms. <=Emphasis mine.
This is quite telling. Infers absolute knowledge of coordination and conspiracy between the socials. My gut feeling is that Q does not ask questions if the answers are not already known. How very powerful (and revealing) the answers to the above questions will be!
Plausible deniability. If Q ever got caught, he can't be considered a leaker, because he leaked nothing. If the big habbening day ever comes, everyone and their mother would go read Q posts to see what he actually said, and they can't blame him for being a leaker too. It's genius.
Just sent my quick story about my twitter censorship and how they suspended my acct indef. after Jan 6th at the website that it goes to when you type in takeonbigtech.com
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 85cc02 No.544206 📁
Mar 3 2018 23:15:14 (EST)
What I say a class action lawsuit?
When is it effective?
Who controls the narrative?
WHO wrote the singular censorship algorithm?
WHO deployed the algorithm?
WHO instructed them to deploy the algorithm?
SAME embed across multiple platforms.
Why?
Why is the timing relevant?
Where is @Snowden?
Why did ES leave G?
Why has NK out of the news cycle?
Define false flag?
What event(s) change the news cycle?
Why didn’t LV change the news cycle?
You have more than your know.
Apparently, CIA thought Snowden was a strong enough asset to infiltrate the NSA and then let the world know that NSA was up to no good, to deflect what the CIA was doing.
Apparently, CIA thought Snowden was a strong enough asset to infiltrate the NSA and then let the world know that NSA was up to no good, to deflect what the CIA was doing.
This is a hell of a lot different than doing the work of a code monkey.
The suit itself is a good read. One of their arguments is that the US Government has, by putting pressure on YouTube/Facebook/Twitter to censor people, been in violation of the first amendment. Check out page 32 of the YouTube suit:
'Pursuant to Section 230, Defendants are encouraged and immunized by Congress
to censor constitutionally protected speech on the Internet, including by and among its
approximately 2.3 billion users that are citizens of the United States. '
'Defendants are vulnerable to and react to coercive pressure from the federal
government to regulate specific speech. '
'As such, Defendants’ censorship activities amount to state action. '
Someone may have beaten me to this already, but on Q post 830 (far right in photo), it’s interesting that Q writes “WHO” in capitals at the beginning of the question. Could it be that the World Health Organization had a hand in the algorithms?
Going from #830, it looks like the WHO (or maybe North Korean hackers, or maybe even Schmidt or Snowden) wrote one censorship program, which was rolled out to Google and Facebook, and probably bing and twit and tik and even linked in. Thoughts? Improvements?
Right on time... looks like Trump announced it would start at 11, and he started right around 1105 - which matches the post number 1105. Q proof.
Hmmm, gotta double check that , sounds about right though
The lady speaks at 11:04 then Trump at 11:09 according to the RSBN timestamp
https://rumble.com/vjjslz-president-donald-j.-trump-holds-press-conference-announces-big-tech-lawsuit.html
Did he also mention a class action lawsuit recently?
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jJUYLLOO/trump-announces-lawsuit-against-/c/
It'd be awesome if we eventually see some of the Operation Mockingbird creators in court describing the algorithm, how long it's been around, who it was deployed to, etc.
I no longer even look at Google, FB, Twitter, etc. as private companies. They are cabal/gov entities.
Always have been.
I’d give my left testicle for Q to start posting again
I don't think we'll see any more Q posts. We have probably everything we need at this point. I would give my left nut for all of it to go down but I think we're getting there
We didn't start the fire
kek, no idea, fren.
“BOOM”
Since I don't have one, I'd give my husband's left testicle for the same. We're done having babies. Also, I hope every single one of us booted for our views join this and get a piece of the pie
now that's hilarious
LOL!
So to sign up for the lawsuit we just simply put in our email and info and then share our story?
I feel like of q started posting again it would mean the plan isnt real imo. It would be to pacify us and extend the 'plan' further
You are nuts....err a nut I should say
I'll lick your left testicle for free.
Username checks out
Not today, Obola, not today
my God, Barry.
May I also point out something obvious that may have been missed?
What do the letters WHO stand for? Could it be, World Health Organization?
Who controls WHO?
Chyna.
Who controls China?
The ones with the red shield.
Im wondering if that is just Q's way of saying China.
Regulation or Kill?
I say Kill Google, YouTube, Twitter outright. Just end them.
It would be unpopular with the normies to simply end Facebook, so I don't know how you deal with them. Many people have decades of family pictures and keep track of friends and family using it.
There's no reason it can't be run as a utility, kind of like the post office. Especially since it was created with taxpayer money to begin with. Just get rid of tracking and ads, and it would be a decent piece of useful infrastructure, with most of the sunk costs already taken care of.
I would guess that over 95% of people do not keep their own photos on local storage, and throw it away when they get a new phone. That's just the reality of it.
I would have the hardest time with Youtube being gone but will adjust IM sure if that is what it takes to clean things up.
Do away with Twatter and FaceDick, but just clean up YouTube. I would hate to go back to life with out all of the “how to” videos. I can build a house, replace the engine in my truck, make awesome carne asada tacos (shout-out to Sam the Cooking Guy) all because of YouTube.
There are other perfectly good platforms out there, and most serious content makers would port their videos over.
and a lot of sheeple have their lively hoods online through google, youtube and twitter (gamers for one example) ... i don't see them just ending them, although it would be nice
YouTube didn't have any probably with de-monitizing, banning, suspending people with livelyhoods depended on them.
There are other platforms. They can choose one.
hey, i agree, totally
That's like saying WE should have just found a new platform. No. No one should have to.
I've been chased off twitter.
I've been chased off reddit.
I've been chased off voat.
Somehow I have survived. People need to buck it up, buttercup.
How in the hell did you get kicked off voat? That place seemed pretty wide open.
Voat ded.
Everybody kicked off voat. All content lost.
Eric S????? CEO of Alphabet or google, G= google, LV= Las VEGAS
Holy cow! I completely missed this (taken from drop #830):
This is quite telling. Infers absolute knowledge of coordination and conspiracy between the socials. My gut feeling is that Q does not ask questions if the answers are not already known. How very powerful (and revealing) the answers to the above questions will be!
From Q drop #830 I agree that Q does not ask questions that white hats don't already have the answer to.
Is he referring to Edward Snowden writing the algorithm for Big Tech social platforms in collusion. ES leaving the Government?
This is DEFINITELY some kind of major RICO foreign power takeover stuff..
Plausible deniability. If Q ever got caught, he can't be considered a leaker, because he leaked nothing. If the big habbening day ever comes, everyone and their mother would go read Q posts to see what he actually said, and they can't blame him for being a leaker too. It's genius.
GME! Hints at power to the players!
My, we were quick with the post, good job. takeonbigtech.com per Pam Bondi.
Just sent my quick story about my twitter censorship and how they suspended my acct indef. after Jan 6th at the website that it goes to when you type in takeonbigtech.com
Adding, apparently, big tech is at work and warning people after they enter takeonbigtech.com that it might be a suspect site. Ha!👀🤣
Bad Eyesight Mode
LV is Las Vegas—the mass shooting and the MbS assassination attempt.
abbreviations Q alerts
Who is MbS (I only ask because it's not in the list).
Mohammed Bin Salman
https://americandigitalnews.com/index.php/2017/11/10/4706-update-las-vegas-saudi-assassination-attempt/
I didn’t read this article, but a quick look here may spark farther research.
Eric Schmidt, Google…LV? Have to look
from drop 830;
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 85cc02 No.544206 📁 Mar 3 2018 23:15:14 (EST) What I say a class action lawsuit? When is it effective? Who controls the narrative? WHO wrote the singular censorship algorithm? WHO deployed the algorithm? WHO instructed them to deploy the algorithm? SAME embed across multiple platforms. Why? Why is the timing relevant? Where is @Snowden? Why did ES leave G? Why has NK out of the news cycle? Define false flag? What event(s) change the news cycle? Why didn’t LV change the news cycle? You have more than your know.
BOOM. Q
Eric Schmidt, Google, Las Vegas.
Perhaps Eric Schmidt and Google.
Wait, Q predicts stuff and it happens?
Weird.
Clearly, all the algos are the same single algo. There is not one for Fakebook/Lifelog and a different one for Twatter, etc.
Is Q saying ...
Q also indicated that Snowden was never in Russia
Fakebook/Lifelog has servers in China. So, I'm guessing that Snowden has been running that clown op from China this whole time.
Putin has talked about Snowden, but didn't actually admit he was in Russia.
I’d say you’re over the target 🎯
Snowden is not a coding genius. It's comical to think that he needs to be involved at all.
Apparently, CIA thought Snowden was a strong enough asset to infiltrate the NSA and then let the world know that NSA was up to no good, to deflect what the CIA was doing.
So, he must have some skills.
What's your take?
This is a hell of a lot different than doing the work of a code monkey.
Monetary justice is not what some are looking for.
https://market.us/statistics/social-media/facebook/
Facebook has around 2 billion active users.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jJPxLo5G/q-1105/c/
W.H.O. wrote the algorithm, indeed.
Still unsure how this lawsuit goes around 230. Anyone care to explain a little bit?
I aint no expert but the most simple thing to me is that 230 protects platfoms, when they censor they are acting as publishers
So my guess is the lawsuit is aimed to get scotus to rule that they are publishers? No expert here either
The suit itself is a good read. One of their arguments is that the US Government has, by putting pressure on YouTube/Facebook/Twitter to censor people, been in violation of the first amendment. Check out page 32 of the YouTube suit:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.595813/gov.uscourts.flsd.595813.1.0.pdf
'Pursuant to Section 230, Defendants are encouraged and immunized by Congress to censor constitutionally protected speech on the Internet, including by and among its approximately 2.3 billion users that are citizens of the United States. '
'Defendants are vulnerable to and react to coercive pressure from the federal government to regulate specific speech. '
'As such, Defendants’ censorship activities amount to state action. '
Someone may have beaten me to this already, but on Q post 830 (far right in photo), it’s interesting that Q writes “WHO” in capitals at the beginning of the question. Could it be that the World Health Organization had a hand in the algorithms?
Yeah or maybe Q was just using that as a code for China?
Going from #830, it looks like the WHO (or maybe North Korean hackers, or maybe even Schmidt or Snowden) wrote one censorship program, which was rolled out to Google and Facebook, and probably bing and twit and tik and even linked in. Thoughts? Improvements?
I say kill!