he openly braged about stealing the election at one of his presser before the election. his handler had to hustle him of stage. he is a corrupt senile piece of shit.
the only way i could find the video on google was to use the search term " fact checking Biden bragging about cheating in the election. I then used the info on the fact check to find the twitter post. other wise if you try and find it with search engines you wont find it becouse big tech has scrubbed it.
the fact check claimed it was a Mis Quote and that biden was talking about preventing election theft.
It's quite a conflicting quote. You'd think he really did mean anti-fraud since who would be dumb enough to say they're going to cheat the election on live TV. On the other hand, this is Biden we're talking about and if anyone is far gone enough to let that slip on air, it's him.
Hey, nothing wrong with that. How many people still listen to Queen and don't even know how old the band is? I myself enjoy the first three Boston albums, especially third stage (used to have a tape of it. You haven't lived till you've tried to listen to "cool the engines" on a walkman with slowly dying batteries xD)
The statement that “There is no constitutional right to vote” is very misleading.
Article 1, Section 1 provides that members of the House of Representatives shall be chosen by the people of the several states.
The 15th amendment provides: "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude…"
The most direct reference to voting is in clause 2 of the 17th Amendment.
Clause 1. The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures.
Clause 2. When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of each State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.
Then we have Clause 1 of the 26th Amendment which provides: The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.
While the method of presidential selection is left to the state legislatures, all states have opted to use direct voting and as long as they adhere to that decision, the actual voting procedures established by the legislatures must conform to the dictates of the15th and 26th Amendments.
I think the phrasing "no right to vote" is confusing to the average layman, though. Seems like it would be better to lead with "Voting was considered a duty, a responsibility, not a right," which, as I understand it, is how the Founders viewed it.
But when you lead with "it wasn't a right at all," that just gets people's hackles up to where they don't want to listen.
Thank you for the reply. I believe your statement was: “There is no constitutional right to vote” While I accept your assertion of extensive law school study on this subject, your argument is still not persuasive.
There is clearly a difference between a right to vote and a mandate to vote. The right to vote does not come into play until the opportunity arises. As to your potato sack race example. If a legislature chooses that as a method of selection, then no right to vote would be at issue, but when they direct voting as the method of selection, the right to vote is guaranteed by the Constitution. Also, I would hope that your law school taught that when an amendment is properly approved, it becomes part of the Constitution. When I cited Amendment 17, that was indeed germane to the issue.
I am sure you put some thought into your argument and I appreciate that effort. I just disagree with your conclusion.
Well presented argument however I would like to make three points.
I am not supporting your assertion.
You included a material misquotation in your reply. (If a [State] legislature chooses [voting] as a method of selection, then no right to vote would be at issue …….) I actually prefaced the misquoted sentence with the following: “As to your potato potato sack race example”. I then stated: If a legislature chooses that [meaning potato sack race] as a method of selection, then no right to vote would be at issue, but when they direct voting as the method of selection, the right to vote is guaranteed by the Constitution.
Inherent rights are not granted by the constitution but are actually rights derived from the creator. The Bill of Rights specified some of our inherent rights such as speech, press and assembly and emphasized that they were not to be abridged but it did not grant those rights. Very important to this discussion is the Ninth Amendment which states: “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” Later when the fifteenth amendment was approved, the first 10 words confirmed the inherent right of Citizens to vote and then continued on to confirm certain conditions under which that right could not be abridged. It is interesting that it did not make a blanket prohibition of abridgment and left open denial of that right due to age, and sex which conditions were addressed by later amendments. [Section 1 - The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.]
While I initially had no intention of engaging in this type discussion, I must concede that it has been interesting. I haven’t looked at some of these issues in over 60 years as that aspect of my education was not the primary focus of my life and career. I wish you well in your endeavors and applaud your willingness to engage.
Yep…panic. Arizona is a given. Georgia there is so much that they won’t be able to hide. Pennsylvania still has democratic governor and some rabid others in high places that will go to the bitter end. Biden will deliver the ultimatum personally. No audit under any circumstance.
Sacred right to vote? Now that they have destroyed out voting system to the core, they suddenly realize it is "sacred". No it's not sacred. It's a constitutional right. It's always phony when the dems talk about anything having to do with God. Mainly because they live in opposition to Him, as satanists.
shocking as it may be, there are still religious folk who vote for Democrats, so they have to use religious language once in a while to keep their base in line.
It's not him you need to worry about. He's just the Dog and Pony show. What are Kamala and Biden's other handlers doing while he's off pretending to care about elections he barely understands at this point?
Have they started drinking their own Kool-aid? Vast majority of people either don't like him or don't care about him. He has no fans. Cannot draw a crowd. It's like they're pretending he actually got those 80+ million votes when even they know he didn't.
Even better, with some of the gaffs and slip ups he tends to make, with the right roll of the dice, he may say something that will really hurt him. MSM will cover it up of course, but a few people may catch it and we get more material for our memes and blooper reels (like we even need more material for those). This is the guy who said they have the most diverse and inclusive voter fraud organization.
[facepalm] DUHHH, Why didn't I see it before! the PA audit isn't going to have any results for months.
But the Arizona audit is only a month or two from having results to release to the public.
Biden needs to get the focus off of those results now, so the major of voters, who have short attention spans and even shorter memories, don't know what happened.
I hope to Christ somebody with stable internet is recording the audit room footage, btw. I'd do it myself, but a)I'm using a cellphone for internet, and the connection isn't stable, and b) i haven't got the hard drive space to record. Also, c)I didn't know about the footage until recently.
What I wonder is if this declaration will be met with the same passionate response the AZ Patriots came back with when the feds tried to muscle in on state's rights there.
Pennsylvania must be significantly worse than Arizona, considering they seem to be hitting it even more aggressively, preemptively, than they even hit Arizona.
Nah, they want the focus off of arizona before the results can come out, so they can just sweep it under the rug without anyone noticing, or maybe even undermine the results without anyone seeing it. By putting Biden in PA, all the attention diverts away from AZ.
He will have a 115 viewers on YouTube, and 12 people there. He will slur every sentence And nobody will understand anything he says. He's actually helping trump's cause
His handlers have a few days to go over his pre-written speech and his pre-written answers to the approved questions that will be asked by the fawning fake news media. The question I wopuld like to hear - "Why is the Democrat party fighting election audits if the 2020 election was indeed fair and honest?"
Man, for a second there, I was like "Trump's going because Biden's going", then I realized I was looking at the wrong white house's statement. I'm sure we'll get plenty of photos with Biden's crowd of 50 showing up this time. "C'mon man, can't we stop by K-mart and get the secret service some summer clothes and have them stand along the sidewalks so it looks like I have a big crowd?"
Political sleight-of-hand. AZ is winding down, but the results aren't in yet. PA is winding up, so it makes sense to focus there, AWAY from AZ, before the truth comes out.
Besides, this would be a convenient time for evidence to "mysteriously' disappear.
Lol. Does he even know how he was installed? This is completely insulting to us voters whose votes they destroyed
he openly braged about stealing the election at one of his presser before the election. his handler had to hustle him of stage. he is a corrupt senile piece of shit.
Tell me you have a link for that...
your wish is my command this is the best I can find becouse it was scrubbed from the internet
https://twitter.com/i/status/1320107186241048579
Mirrored it to Bitchute In case youtube or twitter try to yeet it.
the only way i could find the video on google was to use the search term " fact checking Biden bragging about cheating in the election. I then used the info on the fact check to find the twitter post. other wise if you try and find it with search engines you wont find it becouse big tech has scrubbed it.
the fact check claimed it was a Mis Quote and that biden was talking about preventing election theft.
it's okay, I just made the bitchute mirror to keep it from disappearing.
Btw, use duckduckgo instead of google. doesn't track you and it's less censorious.
Hell, I still can't believe this is true, but BING sucks less than google...
I've been using Brave Search. Private and uses its own index so you can take Google, Microsoft, etc. completely out of the equation.
It's quite a conflicting quote. You'd think he really did mean anti-fraud since who would be dumb enough to say they're going to cheat the election on live TV. On the other hand, this is Biden we're talking about and if anyone is far gone enough to let that slip on air, it's him.
Yeah, a mis-quote and they couldn't be bothered to just stop and redo the take for whatever reason. Sure...
He might remember occasionally, you know...when he's lucid.
I think his last moment of lucidity has come and gone long ago.
I have that Seals and Croft album. Great duo. Great album. Bring on the boomer comments, but I don't care
Hey, nothing wrong with that. How many people still listen to Queen and don't even know how old the band is? I myself enjoy the first three Boston albums, especially third stage (used to have a tape of it. You haven't lived till you've tried to listen to "cool the engines" on a walkman with slowly dying batteries xD)
I LOVE Queen and I am old enough to have seen them in concert before the USA pissed em off 🙈
Is Queen the band that plays the "we are the champions" song that's so popular with football players?
Awesome. And great to know you have the 'album'. The only way to listen to great music.
nah, you've got it wrong.
The Jasmine was to cover the smell of what you're thinking of. ;) lol
exactly. I laugh every time I read president next to his name.
I prefer RESIDENT Biden
President* with an asterisk works too.
President Corn-pop will be in a medically induced coma for the journey.
Upon arrival, he will be revived with a defibrillator.
PRETEND Resident 😁
For someone who received 80million votes, he sure is scared to verify he got 80 million votes.
Verifying votes is a direct threat to our democracy.
Where by "democracy" I mean generational banking cabal led totalitarian one world government corporatocracy.
Yeah, if we're gonna have a one world government, I prefer it be trollitarian...
This is extremely dangerous to our democracy
this is extremely dangerous to our democracy
Only property owners, veterans, net tax payers and people registered for the draft should be allowed to vote.
If you don’t have skin in the game then fuck off.
The statement that “There is no constitutional right to vote” is very misleading.
Article 1, Section 1 provides that members of the House of Representatives shall be chosen by the people of the several states.
The 15th amendment provides: "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude…"
The most direct reference to voting is in clause 2 of the 17th Amendment.
Then we have Clause 1 of the 26th Amendment which provides: The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.
While the method of presidential selection is left to the state legislatures, all states have opted to use direct voting and as long as they adhere to that decision, the actual voting procedures established by the legislatures must conform to the dictates of the15th and 26th Amendments.
I think the phrasing "no right to vote" is confusing to the average layman, though. Seems like it would be better to lead with "Voting was considered a duty, a responsibility, not a right," which, as I understand it, is how the Founders viewed it.
But when you lead with "it wasn't a right at all," that just gets people's hackles up to where they don't want to listen.
yeah, but honey and vinegar, man.
Thank you for the reply. I believe your statement was: “There is no constitutional right to vote” While I accept your assertion of extensive law school study on this subject, your argument is still not persuasive.
There is clearly a difference between a right to vote and a mandate to vote. The right to vote does not come into play until the opportunity arises. As to your potato sack race example. If a legislature chooses that as a method of selection, then no right to vote would be at issue, but when they direct voting as the method of selection, the right to vote is guaranteed by the Constitution. Also, I would hope that your law school taught that when an amendment is properly approved, it becomes part of the Constitution. When I cited Amendment 17, that was indeed germane to the issue.
I am sure you put some thought into your argument and I appreciate that effort. I just disagree with your conclusion.
Well presented argument however I would like to make three points.
I am not supporting your assertion.
You included a material misquotation in your reply. (If a [State] legislature chooses [voting] as a method of selection, then no right to vote would be at issue …….) I actually prefaced the misquoted sentence with the following: “As to your potato potato sack race example”. I then stated: If a legislature chooses that [meaning potato sack race] as a method of selection, then no right to vote would be at issue, but when they direct voting as the method of selection, the right to vote is guaranteed by the Constitution.
Inherent rights are not granted by the constitution but are actually rights derived from the creator. The Bill of Rights specified some of our inherent rights such as speech, press and assembly and emphasized that they were not to be abridged but it did not grant those rights. Very important to this discussion is the Ninth Amendment which states: “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” Later when the fifteenth amendment was approved, the first 10 words confirmed the inherent right of Citizens to vote and then continued on to confirm certain conditions under which that right could not be abridged. It is interesting that it did not make a blanket prohibition of abridgment and left open denial of that right due to age, and sex which conditions were addressed by later amendments. [Section 1 - The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.]
While I initially had no intention of engaging in this type discussion, I must concede that it has been interesting. I haven’t looked at some of these issues in over 60 years as that aspect of my education was not the primary focus of my life and career. I wish you well in your endeavors and applaud your willingness to engage.
Yep. NOT in the Constitution.
We've already taken those actions. All he's gonna do is smell women's hair, eat some ice cream, and hit on little girls.
I like the reference to SMELLING in the title -
10/10 for relevance! :D
Fighting on four fronts, Biden?
Georgia
Michigan
Wisconsin
Pennsylvania
Only need 2.
Yep…panic. Arizona is a given. Georgia there is so much that they won’t be able to hide. Pennsylvania still has democratic governor and some rabid others in high places that will go to the bitter end. Biden will deliver the ultimatum personally. No audit under any circumstance.
Sacred right to vote? Now that they have destroyed out voting system to the core, they suddenly realize it is "sacred". No it's not sacred. It's a constitutional right. It's always phony when the dems talk about anything having to do with God. Mainly because they live in opposition to Him, as satanists.
shocking as it may be, there are still religious folk who vote for Democrats, so they have to use religious language once in a while to keep their base in line.
And voting is a Duty, not a right.
Does he mean the sacred Constitutional right to not have your vote cancelled out by fraudulent illegal "votes?"
Voting rights of the dead?
Then Biden's the perfect representative, given he's half dead already =P
I'm kinda glad Biden is their front man. Someone with brains might have me concerned
The Brains are who is controlling Biden's puppet strings. That is what is scary. Who are they?
It's not him you need to worry about. He's just the Dog and Pony show. What are Kamala and Biden's other handlers doing while he's off pretending to care about elections he barely understands at this point?
Lying dog faced pony soldier!
Admittedly, maybe I should have said circus instead of Dog and Pony show, lol.
Only a dozen people will show up, all of them from the fake news media.
This.
Have they started drinking their own Kool-aid? Vast majority of people either don't like him or don't care about him. He has no fans. Cannot draw a crowd. It's like they're pretending he actually got those 80+ million votes when even they know he didn't.
Even better, with some of the gaffs and slip ups he tends to make, with the right roll of the dice, he may say something that will really hurt him. MSM will cover it up of course, but a few people may catch it and we get more material for our memes and blooper reels (like we even need more material for those). This is the guy who said they have the most diverse and inclusive voter fraud organization.
Yeah whatever you say corn pop, you're just jealous you don't have hairy legs
Even trying to make good statements look like trump.
https://twitter.com/ElectionWiz/status/1413693793380053000
Can he even get out an appearance without some incoherent babbling?
I hope not.
The commies are gettin' sscaaared!
Pushing mail-in voting GUARANTEED. If he can remember.
This means they gave up on AZ and Katie Hobbs is now cannon fodder.
[facepalm] DUHHH, Why didn't I see it before! the PA audit isn't going to have any results for months.
But the Arizona audit is only a month or two from having results to release to the public.
Biden needs to get the focus off of those results now, so the major of voters, who have short attention spans and even shorter memories, don't know what happened.
I hope to Christ somebody with stable internet is recording the audit room footage, btw. I'd do it myself, but a)I'm using a cellphone for internet, and the connection isn't stable, and b) i haven't got the hard drive space to record. Also, c)I didn't know about the footage until recently.
Just more attempts to change the cheat narrative back. We all know now but they can't deviate from the script.
What I wonder is if this declaration will be met with the same passionate response the AZ Patriots came back with when the feds tried to muscle in on state's rights there.
Pennsylvania must be significantly worse than Arizona, considering they seem to be hitting it even more aggressively, preemptively, than they even hit Arizona.
NCSWIC.
Nah, they want the focus off of arizona before the results can come out, so they can just sweep it under the rug without anyone noticing, or maybe even undermine the results without anyone seeing it. By putting Biden in PA, all the attention diverts away from AZ.
Don't lose track of PA, keep an eye on AZ.
I have a sneaky little feeling that Joe flipped a long time ago to save his family.
Now, he goes into these 11th hour meetings with different Governors, wearing a wire. They incriminate themselves on tape.
If I was a crooked Governor, I'd be really afraid about who I could trust.
He will have a 115 viewers on YouTube, and 12 people there. He will slur every sentence And nobody will understand anything he says. He's actually helping trump's cause
I for one can't wait to her that thief try and talk. Oh... POOLED PRESS! LOL!!!
Trump needs to hold a rally the same day.
Well Met...From your lips to GEOTUS' ears
They could care less about the sacred Constitution
For what? So he can say C’mon man!
He won 81 million votes but has to go try to stop an audit? In the most secure, fair election ever? hhhhmmmmm.
Yea thanks joe. We already have that right. We defend the “value” of the vote that makes the citizens choice sacred.
His handlers have a few days to go over his pre-written speech and his pre-written answers to the approved questions that will be asked by the fawning fake news media. The question I wopuld like to hear - "Why is the Democrat party fighting election audits if the 2020 election was indeed fair and honest?"
Man, for a second there, I was like "Trump's going because Biden's going", then I realized I was looking at the wrong white house's statement. I'm sure we'll get plenty of photos with Biden's crowd of 50 showing up this time. "C'mon man, can't we stop by K-mart and get the secret service some summer clothes and have them stand along the sidewalks so it looks like I have a big crowd?"
Political sleight-of-hand. AZ is winding down, but the results aren't in yet. PA is winding up, so it makes sense to focus there, AWAY from AZ, before the truth comes out.
Besides, this would be a convenient time for evidence to "mysteriously' disappear.
Very confused don’t see or hear anyone trying to orefebt legit voters
I read that as Biden set to go to Transylvania.
Well remember where his health secretary came from.