The original gif is a time lapse over several hours not a real time explosion. Volcanoes explode non-stop for hours on end whereas a nuke is one and done within seconds.
This now archived forum poured into the hoax that is nuclear weapons. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were firebombed, just like Tokyo was.
The nuke videos were produced by Hollywood, with special effects and such to simulate huge blasts. Look at the Russian video of the Tsar Bomb, it’s fake as fuck considering how special effects have improved since then.
On a trip to San Francisco, I toured a Victorian mansion that survived the post quake fire. There were post fire photos on the wall. What struck me was that the photos looked astonishingly similar to post bombing photos of Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the peace museums in Japan, both of which I have also toured. It made me go hm-mm, and I wondered if Hiroshima and Nagasaki had been fire bombed, rather than nuked as we had been told. All Japanese who survived the bombings receive free medical care for life, and they show photos of injuries which they say are radiation burns. Some people were so badly burned that they continuously begged for water. Doctors would not let them have the water they wanted because they said it would make them die faster. A few years after seeing the SF photos, I discovered Miles Mathis, who has some convincing articles and photos which indicate the Manhattan Project to develop nuclear bombs was a huge hoax:
http://mileswmathis.com/trinity.pdf
So what is real in our world, and what is fake? Eventually we will know. Looking forward to that.
You make a claim, bring the receipts. I would like to read your findings. I definitely think there's more to nukes than what we have been told. But I lack any data.
Sediments kicked up by pressure release, possibly underwater vents, before the actual explosion, sorta like they do on land. I'm still so confused why people don't think it was an actual volcano, the island is blown in half qnd they have pictures of the volcano a week before the explosion showing it was active.
...so they blew up a volcano, on a small island, for war. What would destroying a volcano do to advance anyone's agenda? Let me guess, it wasn't ACTUALLY a volcano, it was dr.evils D.U.M.B.
That’s the most logical answer, so no? Idk lmao now I’m confused. Whoever everyone screams at for being wrong is right? Fuck I feel like Brandon right now.
"Similarly, in science, Occam's razor is used as an abductive heuristic in the development of theoretical models rather than as a rigorous arbiter between candidate models."
The concept is not irrefutable, objective fact. Occam's razor is not a statement of absolution that blanketly covers anomalies.
Disrupting local communications. Nukes cause issues with the ionosphere in the surrounding areas and for miles more. I think it's theorized that one nuke on each coast would kill all radio COMMS for 12 hours or something.
Point being, nukes have a stronger impact on radio communications. Volcanoes like hurricanes will have effects on the localized area. Also the video on the ground proves my point above, the eruptions continue. Nukes go off once and that's it.
Was there recorded tremors prior to the eruption? Has there ever not been tremors recorded prior to an eruption in the history of recording volcanoes? 🤔
hahah, so now anything found on the internet is a lie? or is that only when it doesn't align to your pipe dream of a russian ship carrying a 16 nuke payload running itself into an island, exploding, and left no traces of radiation, but instead left all the signs of a volcanic eruption, during, and after the eruption....you know, to cover up the nukes. pesky deep state, so inventive.
Q. It was in the circle of fire, yes? So whatever it was ruptured or reached lava? Because I watched the tsunami videos and you could hear lava eruptions/explosions. We just don't know what's going on. On any of this.
The time lapse video proves in of itself it's a volcano eruption. Ash clouds move much slower comparatively than a nuclear explosion.
A bomb is instant and that explosion is fully expanded within seconds. Eruptions are going non-stop for hours and as the time lapse shows you can see the sun set before the cloud is done expanding. Volcanic eruptions are also considerably more powerful than nukes, however the energy is pointed in one direction whereas a bomb's energy expands in all directions which is why again, people think nukes are more powerful than they actually.
Compared to nature, the nuke is still a cheap imitation.
I’m open minded about it. It wouldn’t surprise me if there was some man made intervention that helped an active volcano along a bit. I haven’t seen any of the usual geology fags input on the chans about whether there were any prior indications of volcanic activity or warning signs before? Maybe it was indicated to blow and was helped along as it could have had strategic significance for the black hats?
Shit. I’ll be glad when the day comes that we know for sure wtf is going on. We are having trouble determining if it was a volcano, an explosive, or someone’s ex-wife farting underwater. Sucks…
I'm gonna need more than that before I'm convinced it was man made. The nuclear fallout should be detectable by now if it was a nuke, and without radiation that narrows down the options quite a bit. This thing was ultra visible from space and a volcano makes the most sense imho.
Maybe bc the object rentering would always be perpendicular to the earth’s surface since it’s a globe and the object is moving fast enough that the rotation of the earth would be negligible?
It would come in at some sort of angle, but an East to West orbit is much more expensive to put up there than a West to East. The think that throws it all off is that it's a time lapse, if the object was falling that fast and picked up in more than one frame, it means those drifting clouds are breaking the speed of sound, not likely.
Not brilliant at science but I think the tungsten "utility pole" would break up a bit, but the force generated by the mass and the speed of the rod is what destroys the intended target for a kinetic weapon. The force is what destroys a city, not the tungsten telephone pole.
Not buying the theory. The scale is totally wrong.
First, we're watching through time-lapse. What's the time interval between ticks on this image? We're used to seeing video at 24 frames per second (film) or higher in video games/digital media. I don't have that frame rate data in front of me, but given how fast the explosion is in this version vs what I've seen in other time-lapses, these images show the cloud expanding over a full day's daylight.
This is something I'd expect to see with a volcano. Volcanoes may erupt spewing ash like this for days or weeks. It's a slow continuous high-volume emission, which is why we end up seeing it in time-lapse to be able to perceive the scale.
A weapons explosion is very different because it releases only the tiniest fraction of energy in comparison to what we're seeing out of the volcano. The energy is released rapidly over seconds, even with MOABs or nuclear weapons. We've all seen those videos of above ground nuclear tests where the mushroom cloud evolves over a minute or two.
The second issue here is visual scale. Other videos show us what the island looks like. It's big enough to house a volcano. Can you identify the right pixels in the blue where the island was pre-explosion in this gif? We're zoomed out, viewing from space. What's being identified as a white object (our presumed explosive) would be larger than an aircraft carrier at this scale, as is that "splash."
I'm not buying the idea that a missile was shot at the volcano to trigger the eruption. Too many things wrong with the video.
Would be interesting to know if there are skipped frames in this footage. One could cut out frames and crop the image so the "white object" never actually moved. Clouds were moving in that direction.
Listen to the video. There was a series of timed explosions followed by a very large explosion. Plus this gif clearly shows a missile/bomb entering the water.
Around the same time was a rare sighting of an american nuclear sub.
Remember a few weeks ago when a sub hit an unmarked underwater "mountain". I bet this was it.
Whatever that is hitting the water has to be huge... I don't think you would capture video of a nuke hitting from space it's just too small... (I could be wrong)
Whatever is hitting the water is massive and could have triggered the volcanic eruption, maybe an asteroid or one of these tic-tac's we have heard so much about... or something from space... who knows.
I mean, deport is too harsh, and makes work for mods, but this post seems like a bit of a basket case.
I love all the speculation and the discussion, but I think some peeps forget that natural events actually happen from time to time, and Tonga is smack bang in the middle of the most volcanic part of planet Earth, so...
On the other hand, Djokovic was perhaps coming back to Australia to try again and make a point, but the Australians took him out by exploding a volcano under his plane. Just a theory.
Krakatoa's shockwave spread over the earth 4 times over.
By 1883, weather stations in scores of cities across the world were using barometers to track changes in atmospheric pressure. Six hours and 47 minutes after the Krakatoa explosion, a spike of air pressure was detected in Calcutta. By 8 hours, the pulse reached Mauritius in the west and Melbourne and Sydney in the east. By 12 hours, St. Petersburg noticed the pulse, followed by Vienna, Rome, Paris, Berlin, and Munich. By 18 hours the pulse had reached New York, Washington, D.C., and Toronto. Amazingly, for as many as five days after the explosion, weather stations in 50 cities around the globe observed this unprecedented spike in pressure recurring like clockwork, approximately every 34 hours. That is roughly how long it takes sound to travel around the entire planet.
Or maybe the perception of there being nothing there is a fiction, like the perception of NK being a total hovel and it being outed by Q as a DS asset site for all kinds of stuff. Maybe Tonga was being used as a trafficking hub for whatever cargo they were moving?
Hilarious. No apparent reason for Tonga to be a target---so this is an argument for why it was a target. You guys should listen to yourselves.
Having lived near a real-as-a-heart-attack volcanic eruption (Mt. St. Helens in 1980), I can affirm that there is plenty of foreshadowing, and then the Main Event happens faster than you can imagine. Rated as a multi-megaton explosive equivalent.
Complete fantasy. We have no such weapon. It might have been a meteor, but the real fact is that we do not know what it was, if it was anything. Dreaming stuff up is what children do.
I've contributed weapons to ours. What are your credentials? Look up YAL-1A. Or the Standard 3 warhead. I'm familiar with the communist bloc weapon systems.
Looks exactly like when my ex-wife would fart in the bathtub.
It was from his ex-wife.
😂
KEK
All three of them
Is her name Big Helen?
Come on, guys, you know ladies don't fart. I only ever heard my mother fart twice in my whole life. Once was her reaction to hearing a bad joke.
I am so pregnant right now and I can confirm - ladies fart
Its my sons fault 😂
The original gif is a time lapse over several hours not a real time explosion. Volcanoes explode non-stop for hours on end whereas a nuke is one and done within seconds.
This is what it did for 12 hours:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uq4j05KvTRA
Indeed. I’m thinking these people have never heard of Krakatoa.
Clearly an inside job by the derp state...
/s
Thank you for posting this. I actually did not know there was a seven day eruption... that's insane.
Well Krakatoa did make people go deaf miles away! ;)
Crack a what now?
Sounds like when my wife shuffles her feet and kicks something hard in the house, she cracks-her-toe-ow
Dear customer,
We are happy to inform you that your efforts have been screened by our team, and you have been attributed 17 kek points.
Everyone here needs to really wake up about Nukes. They’re a 70+ year globohomo hoax.
This now archived forum poured into the hoax that is nuclear weapons. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were firebombed, just like Tokyo was.
The nuke videos were produced by Hollywood, with special effects and such to simulate huge blasts. Look at the Russian video of the Tsar Bomb, it’s fake as fuck considering how special effects have improved since then.
https://www.big-lies.org/nuke-lies/www.nukelies.com/forum/mobile-nuke.html
On a trip to San Francisco, I toured a Victorian mansion that survived the post quake fire. There were post fire photos on the wall. What struck me was that the photos looked astonishingly similar to post bombing photos of Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the peace museums in Japan, both of which I have also toured. It made me go hm-mm, and I wondered if Hiroshima and Nagasaki had been fire bombed, rather than nuked as we had been told. All Japanese who survived the bombings receive free medical care for life, and they show photos of injuries which they say are radiation burns. Some people were so badly burned that they continuously begged for water. Doctors would not let them have the water they wanted because they said it would make them die faster. A few years after seeing the SF photos, I discovered Miles Mathis, who has some convincing articles and photos which indicate the Manhattan Project to develop nuclear bombs was a huge hoax: http://mileswmathis.com/trinity.pdf
So what is real in our world, and what is fake? Eventually we will know. Looking forward to that.
Look up Patel Patriot's work in decoding comms. He'll set you off in the right direction.
You make a claim, bring the receipts. I would like to read your findings. I definitely think there's more to nukes than what we have been told. But I lack any data.
So it probably was a volcano then?
It most definitely was. Search "Tonga Volcano" in your preferred search engine.
See this is where my conspiracy brain starts working overtime.
If they have footage that clear of a random event... then where is the few hours when it was calm?
This video starts after whatever fell out of the sky had already hit.
Sediments kicked up by pressure release, possibly underwater vents, before the actual explosion, sorta like they do on land. I'm still so confused why people don't think it was an actual volcano, the island is blown in half qnd they have pictures of the volcano a week before the explosion showing it was active.
...so they blew up a volcano, on a small island, for war. What would destroying a volcano do to advance anyone's agenda? Let me guess, it wasn't ACTUALLY a volcano, it was dr.evils D.U.M.B.
Jesus, have some discernment, man.
You have confirmation bias
Yeah...... so what is the scale and time frame? How fast are the clouds above going?
I am going to go with real, just makes most sense. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoMRwyNhqJ4
There was no interference with radio communications beyond the surrounding area. Also no radiation has been detected or reported.
Sorry I have a tendency to fall for the "logical and simple questions" line of thinking.
Let me introduce you to Occam’s razor. The most logical answer is not always the right one.
Isn't it the answer with fewest assumption is often the correct one?
That’s the most logical answer, so no? Idk lmao now I’m confused. Whoever everyone screams at for being wrong is right? Fuck I feel like Brandon right now.
"Similarly, in science, Occam's razor is used as an abductive heuristic in the development of theoretical models rather than as a rigorous arbiter between candidate models."
The concept is not irrefutable, objective fact. Occam's razor is not a statement of absolution that blanketly covers anomalies.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor
Australian news reporting communications are down and toxic air.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kbVc4FtbE0
Disrupting local communications. Nukes cause issues with the ionosphere in the surrounding areas and for miles more. I think it's theorized that one nuke on each coast would kill all radio COMMS for 12 hours or something.
Point being, nukes have a stronger impact on radio communications. Volcanoes like hurricanes will have effects on the localized area. Also the video on the ground proves my point above, the eruptions continue. Nukes go off once and that's it.
Sounds like the swamp gas and air balloons bs
Was there recorded tremors prior to the eruption? Has there ever not been tremors recorded prior to an eruption in the history of recording volcanoes? 🤔
"While some volcanic eruptions can be predicted, not all will show show warning signs, says Mitchell." https://www.sciencefocus.com/news/tonga-volcano/
🙄👎
LOL, "how dare you shut me down with facts"
You can find any “fact” you want on the internet these days!
hahah, so now anything found on the internet is a lie? or is that only when it doesn't align to your pipe dream of a russian ship carrying a 16 nuke payload running itself into an island, exploding, and left no traces of radiation, but instead left all the signs of a volcanic eruption, during, and after the eruption....you know, to cover up the nukes. pesky deep state, so inventive.
You’re awakening will be drastic. I hope you handle it well…
I heard a theory that a lot of the dark web is hosted there. Seems thin, but it’s something.
Well it destroyed an island off of Hawaii...what was on that island.
Maybe they triggered a volcano
Q. It was in the circle of fire, yes? So whatever it was ruptured or reached lava? Because I watched the tsunami videos and you could hear lava eruptions/explosions. We just don't know what's going on. On any of this.
The time lapse video proves in of itself it's a volcano eruption. Ash clouds move much slower comparatively than a nuclear explosion.
A bomb is instant and that explosion is fully expanded within seconds. Eruptions are going non-stop for hours and as the time lapse shows you can see the sun set before the cloud is done expanding. Volcanic eruptions are also considerably more powerful than nukes, however the energy is pointed in one direction whereas a bomb's energy expands in all directions which is why again, people think nukes are more powerful than they actually.
Compared to nature, the nuke is still a cheap imitation.
A ‘rod of God’… I think that’s where the disconnect is
A rod of God would have been down between frames and not seen, if seen on just one frame it wouldn't be wide enough to show up at this distance.
Just because you're on a board called GreatAwakening doesn't mean everyone will agree with you 100.
I’m open minded about it. It wouldn’t surprise me if there was some man made intervention that helped an active volcano along a bit. I haven’t seen any of the usual geology fags input on the chans about whether there were any prior indications of volcanic activity or warning signs before? Maybe it was indicated to blow and was helped along as it could have had strategic significance for the black hats?
Shit. I’ll be glad when the day comes that we know for sure wtf is going on. We are having trouble determining if it was a volcano, an explosive, or someone’s ex-wife farting underwater. Sucks…
🤣 most def the fart. The simplest explanation is always the answer Occam’s razor
In other videos you can hear a series of explosions before the "nuke" goes off.
Im guessing this was the "underwater mountain" that that sub hit some weeks ago.
good catch. interesting. indeed
Could be a weapon demonstration, with all the possibilities that throws up.
Yep. One of those hypersonic missles from Russia or China.
I'm gonna need more than that before I'm convinced it was man made. The nuclear fallout should be detectable by now if it was a nuke, and without radiation that narrows down the options quite a bit. This thing was ultra visible from space and a volcano makes the most sense imho.
Google maps: "Wild and undeveloped Volcanic Island used for scientific study by NASA AND OTHERS"..... 🧐
I have watched several much higher quality versions of this and the thing pointed to in the gif and the source clip is not there. Fake.
Care to share?
Just search "Tonga Eruption Satellite" and there are all kinds of them to look at.
I'll bite. What do you think it is?
Rod of God
Why completely verticle? What if it came in on an angle?
Because rods of God fall the most direct line to earth
Maybe bc the object rentering would always be perpendicular to the earth’s surface since it’s a globe and the object is moving fast enough that the rotation of the earth would be negligible?
It would come in at some sort of angle, but an East to West orbit is much more expensive to put up there than a West to East. The think that throws it all off is that it's a time lapse, if the object was falling that fast and picked up in more than one frame, it means those drifting clouds are breaking the speed of sound, not likely.
Not brilliant at science but I think the tungsten "utility pole" would break up a bit, but the force generated by the mass and the speed of the rod is what destroys the intended target for a kinetic weapon. The force is what destroys a city, not the tungsten telephone pole.
A VOLCANO
My guess is a bomb of some sort.
Hubs says the risen land around the volcano is the size of Hokkaido. Can a bomb do that? Just wondering.
It's 100% fake
Not buying the theory. The scale is totally wrong.
First, we're watching through time-lapse. What's the time interval between ticks on this image? We're used to seeing video at 24 frames per second (film) or higher in video games/digital media. I don't have that frame rate data in front of me, but given how fast the explosion is in this version vs what I've seen in other time-lapses, these images show the cloud expanding over a full day's daylight.
This is something I'd expect to see with a volcano. Volcanoes may erupt spewing ash like this for days or weeks. It's a slow continuous high-volume emission, which is why we end up seeing it in time-lapse to be able to perceive the scale.
A weapons explosion is very different because it releases only the tiniest fraction of energy in comparison to what we're seeing out of the volcano. The energy is released rapidly over seconds, even with MOABs or nuclear weapons. We've all seen those videos of above ground nuclear tests where the mushroom cloud evolves over a minute or two.
The second issue here is visual scale. Other videos show us what the island looks like. It's big enough to house a volcano. Can you identify the right pixels in the blue where the island was pre-explosion in this gif? We're zoomed out, viewing from space. What's being identified as a white object (our presumed explosive) would be larger than an aircraft carrier at this scale, as is that "splash."
I'm not buying the idea that a missile was shot at the volcano to trigger the eruption. Too many things wrong with the video.
For more thoughts check out the excellent post from u/special1ntere5t / https://greatawakening.win/p/141F5octiS/are-they-using-dog-comms-for-mor/
They were just blowing up Epsteins island.
What in the flatearth is this BS?
Exaclty. Just as fake as flat earth.
Would be interesting to know if there are skipped frames in this footage. One could cut out frames and crop the image so the "white object" never actually moved. Clouds were moving in that direction.
so it was a nuke?
No.
Listen to the video. There was a series of timed explosions followed by a very large explosion. Plus this gif clearly shows a missile/bomb entering the water.
Around the same time was a rare sighting of an american nuclear sub.
Remember a few weeks ago when a sub hit an unmarked underwater "mountain". I bet this was it.
Whatever that is hitting the water has to be huge... I don't think you would capture video of a nuke hitting from space it's just too small... (I could be wrong)
Whatever is hitting the water is massive and could have triggered the volcanic eruption, maybe an asteroid or one of these tic-tac's we have heard so much about... or something from space... who knows.
Where's the dislike button when you need it?
I mean, deport is too harsh, and makes work for mods, but this post seems like a bit of a basket case.
I love all the speculation and the discussion, but I think some peeps forget that natural events actually happen from time to time, and Tonga is smack bang in the middle of the most volcanic part of planet Earth, so...
On the other hand, Djokovic was perhaps coming back to Australia to try again and make a point, but the Australians took him out by exploding a volcano under his plane. Just a theory.
You all need to go to your favorite video site and search for sat loops. Spoiler: it's fake.
out of every one there is only ONE super low quality gif that has these. Use that wrinkled thing in your head.
So what could produce that kind of explosion?
Plate tectonics and a magma chamber under pressure?
THEN WHAT MADE THE HHHHHUGE SHOCK WAVE....that was like a nuke...but NOT like a volcano...even a big eruption like Iceland's or Krakatoa?
Krakatoa's shockwave spread over the earth 4 times over.
Is it related to them wanting to adopt BTC as a legal tender?
https://www.coinhighlight.com/2022/01/kingdom-of-tonga-may-adopt-bitcoin-as-legal-tender-says-former-member-of-parliament-bitcoin-news/
https://news.bitcoin.com/kingdom-of-tonga-may-adopt-bitcoin-as-legal-tender-says-former-member-of-parliament/
https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2021/10/05/tonga-to-adopt-bitcoin-as-a-national-currency-just-like-el-salvador/
But why Tonga? Literally nothing there
Or maybe the perception of there being nothing there is a fiction, like the perception of NK being a total hovel and it being outed by Q as a DS asset site for all kinds of stuff. Maybe Tonga was being used as a trafficking hub for whatever cargo they were moving?
Hilarious. No apparent reason for Tonga to be a target---so this is an argument for why it was a target. You guys should listen to yourselves.
Having lived near a real-as-a-heart-attack volcanic eruption (Mt. St. Helens in 1980), I can affirm that there is plenty of foreshadowing, and then the Main Event happens faster than you can imagine. Rated as a multi-megaton explosive equivalent.
Complete fantasy. We have no such weapon. It might have been a meteor, but the real fact is that we do not know what it was, if it was anything. Dreaming stuff up is what children do.
I've contributed weapons to ours. What are your credentials? Look up YAL-1A. Or the Standard 3 warhead. I'm familiar with the communist bloc weapon systems.
Remember a few weeks ago when a sub hit an unmarked underwater "mountain". I bet this was it.
Doesnt really matter, media can use it to distract regardless