205
Comments (107)
sorted by:
31
Murphy71 31 points ago +44 / -13

You lost me at “Juan O Savin”…

29
HelloDolly 29 points ago +29 / -0

I haven't followed the back and forth on whether this guy is a paytriot or whatever, but I listened to the podcast and the explanation of the Law of War manual and what is probably happening was very much worthwhile. Something is either true or it isn't. Doesn't really matter who the messenger is IMO. He connects a lot of real time things that took place that I have not seen connected in the same way elsewhere. Plus, if you were to share this with a person totally new to the entire concept of what is being discussed, it is easily understood, digestible, and plausible enough to give anyone pause. It explains a lot of the weirdness we have seen over the last 365 days.

3
Whitwat 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree 100%. This makes the most sense to me as to the significance of a year being stated by President Trump.

1
Chimera 1 point ago +2 / -1

He's not JFK Jr. though. People were trying to say that he was. Even if JFK Jr. was still alive that guy sounds nothing like him.

2
Stinky_Stork 2 points ago +2 / -0

this would be important if he were making that claim himself. He never claimed to be Jr AFAIK.

Edit: im seeing in other comments that he did dance around the notion of being Jr and/or never denied it... this is just as bad.

1
HelloDolly 1 point ago +1 / -0

Never heard that but I agree. Not JFK Jr

0
Strelnieks 0 points ago +2 / -2

All you need to know is he'll happily sell you books and take anon' s monthly donations/subscriptions in return for half truths stolen from the bakers and outright lies based on fake insider access/knowledge.

6
rherrell 6 points ago +11 / -5

Amen brother!

5
Honor+Duty 5 points ago +5 / -0

What did he do? I hear him on various podcasts occasionally. He tells bible stories, talks about God and government, Trump.

Never heard anything wierd that he claimed that wasn’t true but I haven’t really followed him.

3
populist_nationalist 3 points ago +7 / -4

He has made all kinds of predictions that turned out to be wrong. And why doesn't he show his face? He glows.

5
leadvillejim 5 points ago +6 / -1

Not for or against this resource. To be honest, he didn't interest me, and I didn't care for some of the ways he was carrying on (mystery man off camera. Oooooh. Give me a break).

But he's certainly shared his face. In fact he participated in a rally in Vegas in late October, and was a presenter.

As for this podcast, it's an insightful and interesting summary of why today, 1/20, was important, The Law of War, the EO on foreign interference in elections, the legal reasons for the way the plan has been conducted the last 365 days, etc. It's good stuff

3
CrimsonSentinal 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, he’s shown his face, there was a video in Jan or Feb of last year where he was standing in a woodsy area talking with a guest. He was on screen the entire time. I can’t find the video, maybe he scrubbed it? But he most definitely was on camera breaking from his regular “mystery man” approach.

3
SoMuchWinning45 3 points ago +4 / -1

Making predictions that don't turn out to happen is one thing; saying something will for sure happen within a time table, then doesn't actually happen is when you can say wrong like Trump does.

2
Chimera 2 points ago +5 / -3

Yeah where do all those Juan O Savin and Charlie Ward type people come from? They all just sprung up and acted like they were hot shit in the know about all the governments just because they do a zoom call that they call a "roundtable discussion". What makes them insiders?

1
Stinky_Stork 1 point ago +1 / -0

oddly enough Juan was a regular on the Able Danger/Field McConnell show long before he became the big name he is today... he started popping up all over after Field got arrested as i remember it.

0
Chimera 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hmmm that seems convenient.

1
suave200 1 point ago +4 / -3

His camera slipped once and he accidentally showed his face for a few seconds. Having seen it I can understand why he avoids showing it. Kek

0
Callmejuls 0 points ago +1 / -1

Anything to the possible theory of JFK Jr. alive?

0
therobots 0 points ago +1 / -1

Who hasn't?

1
populist_nationalist 1 point ago +2 / -1

Okay, well if you want to continue believing bullshit then go right ahead. Track records matter.

1
therobots 1 point ago +2 / -1

I will consume and process whatever the fuck I want and don't need your permission.

You sound like a reddit faggot who makes no contribution but instead just rips on people. I called it out and you delivered like a good glowie. FO

3
deleted 3 points ago +5 / -2
6
spanglevision 6 points ago +8 / -2

agreed: total paytriot. He auctions off signed posters on his barely functional website and they go for like $700. He won't show his face and we know real patriots have nothing to hide. I never understood his appeal.

8
Europa 8 points ago +10 / -2

I liked him, I really liked how he brought the bible stories to life … but his pseudo dance around the idea that he was JFK Jr. …tanked his credibility.

He shouldn’t have done that…did he do it to sell his book….KID ON THE SIDE OF THE ROAD?

These grifters should realize their temporary sleight of hand is always revealed, especially when they are trying to con the greatest hive mind that ever existed.

Not smart.

4
Unhappymeal 4 points ago +6 / -2

This here sums up the dislike of the man among patriots. He did exactly what was described here.

2
DontTreadOnIT 2 points ago +3 / -1

He constantly promotes a mystique about himself and all the secret stuff he wants people to think he knows.

Obvious pay-triot. Likely controlled-opposition with the goal of keeping anons distracted from real research.

2
inspir3dgenius 2 points ago +2 / -0

the greatest hive mind that ever existed

Beautiful way of putting that

0
Callmejuls 0 points ago +2 / -2

But what if he is him? Were their bodies ever recovered after crash?

-1
Chimera -1 points ago +1 / -2

Yeah and why is Roseanne Barr involved with those people?

4
escapegoat 4 points ago +5 / -1

Isn't it just Randy Quaid? Sure sounds like him.

Anyhow, it's infotainment, and that's the appeal. Some people pay for that. I'd rather pay for some overpriced slippers from the pillow guy, or purchase Trump's picture book, but that's my choice.

1
SoMuchWinning45 1 point ago +2 / -1

The guy that claims to be Juan O'Savin has a gravely voice like Alex Jones.

1
spanglevision 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can hear a little Randy Quaid in his voice, but it's not 100%. Sounds like a mix between Tom Arnold and Randy Quaid.

0
StageL3ft [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

19
quila62 19 points ago +21 / -2

Great explanation of 11.3 and very timely. Worth the time to listen. Thank you.

14
Death_Metal_Patriot 14 points ago +24 / -10

People still give a shit about this LARP?

20
StageL3ft [S] 20 points ago +24 / -4

Regardless of his past and other's opinions of it, what he says in this video is worth listening too.

0
Chimera 0 points ago +2 / -2

Why do people keep saying this? No, his credibility is not there regardless of his past. I could make videos of the same type with a perfect JFK Jr. impression and talk about stuff that in reality I have no idea about because I'm not a government insider.

4
cryofreeze 4 points ago +5 / -1

What did he do?

9
StageL3ft [S] 9 points ago +12 / -3

He probably had a working theory that ended up being wrong. I haven't listened to him for a while. Thought I'd check out if there was anything new and was pleasantly surprised.

4
VetforTrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

Juan doesn't claim working theory, he implies inside k owledge.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
13
Qanaut 13 points ago +16 / -3

Excellent find anon!

This is perhaps the best explanation of the 11.3 marker I have ever heard.

Juan really does a great job of laying out the legality behind the Law of War and the End of Occupation.

7
StageL3ft [S] 7 points ago +9 / -2

Thanks! I agree.

Edit= I just wish there was a better explanation of 11.3 and how it pertains to John Podesta.

7
Qanaut 7 points ago +7 / -0

I believe the 11.3 market and the Pizza Gate crimes of the Cabal are mutually exclusive crimes.

11.3 deals with a very specific attack upon the United States perpetrated by China on behalf of the Cabal.

The Podesta case deals with the deeper crimes of the Cabal beyond their attack upon the United States in 2020.

Think of this like how Al Capone was taken down not because of his numerous crimes of murder and conspiracy to commit murder, but because of a simple thing like tax evasion.

I think the Q team knew that going after the Cabal for crimes against humanity was going to take the better part of a couple of decades to prove the cases in not only the judicial courts, but the court of public opinion. The Law of War and the 11.3 marker were very much like President Trump's Operation Warp Speed response to the plandemic and the crimes of Big Pharma. 11.3 is the trojan horse that allows for the Q team and the Military to prosecute the Cabal very quickly because they were caught in the act of a crime that was legally defined years in advance.

5
MatildaJ 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think 11.3 is to do with the 1 year anniversary of the occupation of the BELLIGERENT OCCUPIER and the removal by the military. Juan does a great job of explaining exactly that. I’m not sure where Podesta comes in and I know of the Q passage, but war is fluid and there are bigger fish to be caught ATM.

2
Trumplican4517 2 points ago +2 / -0

look up the definition of "podesta" it'll help

8
VetforTrump 8 points ago +9 / -1

Juan o guesser

7
GreazyCheeks 7 points ago +8 / -1

Persons working to undermine our country have to identify themselves after one year? The deepstate is going to start following rules and laws?

15
MatildaJ 15 points ago +17 / -2

It has to do with the GENEVA CONVENTION which the US is a signatory. If the Military enter DC before 12.00 noon on 20 January, 2022, they are breaking the law and the military could be bought before a World Court like Nuremberg. They are doing EVERYTHING by the book. DC is a country, like the Vatican and the City of London. They are countries within a country.

You are witnessing the systematic destruction of the OLD GUARD.

Q

2
battleofbrooklyn1976 2 points ago +2 / -0

What does this even mean?

MAGA now looking to world courts because the US military is on US soil? Who signed up for this?

The Vatican is a sovereign city-state since a Treaty in 1929. The Pope used to governor much more of Italy, but as Italian nationalism and unification happened in the 1800's most of the "Papal State" became part of Italy. Italy had a king then and in 1929 he and the Pope signed a treaty.

https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Lateran_Treaty

DC and London are not city-states. They are not sovereign nations. Somebody is misunderstanding something.

1
MatildaJ 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think you need to revisit history.

1
battleofbrooklyn1976 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm pretty good on US history. Explain to me how DC is its own country.

2
Goldenhawk 2 points ago +2 / -0

DC, Vatican, and City of London all have one thing in common, an Obelisk denoting the 3 centers of world power. DC = military, CoL= money, Vatican= control/gov. when these obelisks are physically destroyed/removed, then we will have defeated the cabal that controls this planet

0
MetalThatMatters 0 points ago +1 / -1

Nice post.

8
DavoW420 8 points ago +8 / -0

I think the point is after the year is up the military can act legally. They will be obeying the law….IN GITMO!

4
VetforTrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

Let's hope we see that

1
NCSWIC2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

Re DOD ch 11.3.2. The Geneva Convention lasts 1 year AFTER the END of occupation. The occupation hasn’t ended yet so 1/20/22 has no significance because 1/20/21 was the beginning of occupation. Not the end. Not trying to be a buzz kill and I am 100% on the devolution / law of war manual side if this. Just important to note that.

6
FractalizingIron 6 points ago +6 / -0

Thanks. I'm very interesting in this topic. Hopefully this content will shed some light.

5
Unassailable 5 points ago +5 / -0

Cleared me up a lot, did you get a chance to listen? Super clear talk on the manual and law of war, and the one-year deadlines before several critical milestones hit.

4
MatildaJ 4 points ago +4 / -0

He did an interview with Nino Rodrigues around the same time on his drive to Florida. Great interview too but in places it was very patches. He spoke on the blast walls (as he called them) being installed at the Capitol. or WH. And while he said it was to make them (gov) feel secure, I got to thinking that it’s DC that is captured territory and just maybe the Military have to arrest them there. But then again, I’m sure after all these years, the military know what they can and cannot do. Everything has to be above the law. The other thing is his talk about the Trump family and ‘he was not sure how they will take it’. I must go back and listen. He also mentioned that Russia has a sub. off the east coast that are mocking the US navy as they are that close.

4
Unassailable 4 points ago +4 / -0

I saw that one, it was ok, I was glad to hear him on the ball, but have you seen this one?

This things is crystal clear,

super-illuminating.

1
MatildaJ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did you miss putting a link in?

1
Unassailable 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, I was referring to the talk that this post is about Matilda.

1
LeeChild 1 point ago +2 / -1

International waters off the east coast of NYC is actually not that far. This is routine and many countries do it. How many subs do you think we have in international waters off coasts of other nations? We have them. This is nothing new.

2
MatildaJ 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you have listened to what he says, that sub was in close and he KNEW what class. He knew how many warheads it was carrying. How? If you listen to Monkeywerx you would know that at the beginning of the year for many months the Military/Navy were chasing something off Florida. He explained that the fighters were not coming back to shore but refueling from carriers/. Then he posted a detonation that a friend sent him and all Monkey said was ‘I would not want to be anywhere underwater when that thing went off’. Bit by bit, the planes in that area dispersed. And 45 moved back to Florida.

0
LeeChild 0 points ago +1 / -1

Got it/

0
SoMuchWinning45 0 points ago +1 / -1

Not sure how the Trump family will take what? That Jared and Ivanka are gray hats, working for whoever pays the most? Or that Jared is being paid by Israel/Mossad?

1
MatildaJ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don’t know. Juan didn’t elaborate. It can be months into the future and something will be made known and you remember what he said something back then. Like the 2 black hawks landing in downtown LA. He mentions the 2/3 dirty bombs being carried from a building (which used to house the Guatemalan ? can’t quite remember, I think he said embassy) in a Kevlar sling and both going off in different directions then tie that in with Pelosi being denied military aircraft to fly herself and 93 of her family on a fact finding mission overseas just before that and you remember those things. I still remember a week? 5 days BEFORE that he said that Biden would be inaugurated. I remember being absolutely devastated like everyone else but many who heard that early then picked up ‘strange’ things which he confirmed like the rent a plane, the dirty limos, the gun salute which was reserved for funerals, the military turning their backs on Biden, the unprofessional look of the USSS wearing jeans and ‘sandshoes’, then other things like the 11 helicopters full of troops when 45 went to the border and fighters up above him etc. No ‘ex’ President is afforded such security. Then tie that in with what Monkeywerx reports and 45 just hasn’t been playing golf everyday. Why did 45 and family move out of Florida at a moments notice to Bedminister? Could it be because (Monkeywerx was reporting a huge uptick in military planes off Florida) of planes looking for something? Things like on 25TH March 2020, 45 saying ‘extreme precaution and we might actually be at war’. 45 was referring to China unleashing the virus. From that early date Cheyenne Mt was locked down and is still locked down. But what he has said over and over and over is that America/world is going to experience a ‘near death experience’ or a ‘Cuban missile type crisis’. The world is at a turning point. 🙏🏼 And Juan certainly does that.

2
FractalizingIron 2 points ago +2 / -0

Haven't gotten to it yet, but its on my list!

3
Unassailable 3 points ago +3 / -0

This thing is worth listening to as s.o.o.n. as you can get the time.

I used the term in another reply to someone - it's extremely illuminating.

Turns out that noon of tomorrow is the one year mark the military is mandated to wait before taking action against a belligerant occupying force.

Also tomorrow is simultaneously the deadline of one year, that in international law, those who are WITH and AIDING the occupying force, have to formally identify themselves to the people and others in the government that they're WITH that occupying force.

He also says that the first two years of Trump's presidency was heavily occupied with re-writing the manual of war for the nation.

The one year mark for the military is so they can avoid having international legal systems claim they are staging an illegal coup.

It's extremely enlightening, it's all about the manual of war and what's going on around that, why tomorrow at noon is important, how it's all gonna go,

he said this is going to be the stage, when people start getting arrested.

He said that the manual of war stipulates exactly how the military has to act to not violate international laws of war.

6
LRAD 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm not a fan of Juan.

That said, this interview he doesn't ramble on with his stories and has a good breakdown of the DoD Law of War manual in relation to the year occupation of DC by the enemy. It's a good introduction to this topic but not necessarily anything new that Q and Devolution haven't already covered.

I'd treat this not as a datefagging thing but the reminder that we are approaching the greenlight to go from defense to offense while following theetter of the law.

6
deleted 6 points ago +9 / -3
3
Qteepie 3 points ago +4 / -1

glad to see someone else here remembers that. what a faggot trying to act like a rockstar. pinning Juan o Savin makes this place look retarded.

1
Vindicator63 1 point ago +1 / -0

Glad I'm not the only one who remembers that.

5
Unassailable 5 points ago +6 / -1

Extremely clear legal oversight of why this time of the year's important.

It's the full one year the manual of war decrees is the time limit for persons working under influence of or with foreign actors, to identify themselves as doing such.

There's a simultaneous one year the military has to wait to do anything in the nation's interest.

Pretty legally enlightening talk.

Onscreen manual of war pages highlighted, as he tells what's going on.

6
Unassailable 6 points ago +6 / -0

Very lucid, well structured talk on the manual of war and what all is in it.

He also said a lot of the first two years of the President's first term,

was spent rewriting the manual of war.

5
Trumplican4517 5 points ago +8 / -3

congrats Juan on repeating Patel Patriot because Juan has never heard of Devolution or the Department of Defense Law of War Manual before Majic Eyes Qnly broke Q's 11.3 11.4 11.6 crumb. theres a special place in hell for "people" like Juan.

2
SoMuchWinning45 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think there's any place in hell for a hype man that gets things wrong.

3
SoMuchWinning45 3 points ago +3 / -0

The guy that supposedly knows Trump personally?

3
TacticalWitdotcom 3 points ago +3 / -0

I hope this post about today isn't the only thing that happens today.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
TacticalWitdotcom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nope- but supposedly noon is the official mark time.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
Antenna 3 points ago +4 / -1

• Funny how Juan was so hot and then disappeared off the radar except for appearing on obscure Truther channels that indulge in speculation. I have lots of questions: • Why does Juan never show his face, only his $3,000+ boots? Why do interviews with him never start with a bio blurb telling us what he has done and what his credentials are? Who is he really? What's his real name? Why should we listen to him or trust what he says if he won't even tell us his name? • Remember how last summer Juan invited all the top tier Truthers for a private showing of the child sex trafficking movie? Remember afterwards they ALL raved about how he paid for everything and what a mind-blowing movie it was? What happened to that? It was supposed to be released to the pubic Fall 2021, remember? We never got to see it. • Other than pushing his book and his incredibly boring movie that was just endless footage of those boots walking somewhere while he mumbled an endless monologue, what has he done for the Republic, for restoring our elections, for taking out the Globalists? BE CAREFUL WHO YOU FOLLOW.

3
GreenLivesMatter 3 points ago +3 / -0

Okay…Let’s get on with the arrests

3
Munchaussen 3 points ago +6 / -3

Very good and Juan O Savin should never be together in a sentence. Sorry.

3
russiah 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump probably gave the dementia joe a note saying "you have one year". Then pedojoe said " he very generous".

2
pugsan 2 points ago +3 / -1

I get the odd itch Savin is the type of paytriot I don't care for. Something to do with the start and the 'beach' view then, 'Is it too loud? I'll go inside' .. 'No .. I hear nothing' ... Savin pauses 10 secs then goes into the lovely house and put those sweet boots up on that gorgeous furniture in that stunning interior. It looks amazing, but when I never see his face, I get some odd grifter feel off of him. Hope I'm wrong.

2
Vindicator63 2 points ago +2 / -0

Listened to this guy for a while, the wife usually listens to him just to stay up to date. Will sit next to her and do work on the computer. That being said, he drones on and on and I get a funny feeling that this guy likes to hear himself talk. I know we have some Juan fans in here and that's fine, but as I hear his voice I want to tell him to get to the fucking point. This whole thing with the boots almost comes across as condescending. I know he showed his face in Vegas, but again, who the hell is this guy?

2
Antenna 2 points ago +2 / -0

Beautifully written.

2
Notimportant2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Provides clarity via the seemingly disparite details. What i didn't hear was what precisely Trump's authority is during the military phase.

2
SoMuchWinning45 2 points ago +2 / -0

One of the leaders of a government in exile? Like what happened with the Philippians?

2
robistro 2 points ago +2 / -0

criminals follow rules ?

1
CountryBoyWillSurive 1 point ago +1 / -0

My understanding is that it's the white hats who are obliged to follow rules.

Essentially, he said that manipulating the elections of another country is a legally valid way to start a war, just like dropping a nuke would be. But if you do it, you have a year after which you have to identify yourself as a belligerent occupier so the people of the country know who's in charge. It also allows the military to respond within the country against the enemy without being subject to being accused of starting a coup because it's not a coup if you've been invaded.

That's my understanding. I don't know if it's all true, but at least the assertion makes some sense.

1
robistro 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then I would think that bidumb and the bimbo identified themselves as belligerent occupiers at the time they were sworn in.
Even if it was 'fake phony and false' (x22)

2
HighCountryAZ 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'll believe, when we have busted our Jan 6 illegally-incarcerated frens out of jail

2
CMAnon 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's one of the clearest explanations Juan O'Savin has spoken regarding upcoming events. The path forward that I see must first be a take down of lame stream media to insure whatever happens is clearly and precisely explained to the normies without spin or the typical liberal bias. Facts, times, dates, etc. The who, what, where, when and how of the details. If the most rabid talking heads are removed from the conversation and replaced with information that can be verified, then anyone who has issues will have to wait until the next installment. They won't be able to lean on their favorite globalist mouthpiece. I There needs to be a regular update on a daily basis and coverage of live GITMO trials.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Pmb1903 1 point ago +1 / -0

At this point I just think trump and his ppl are just here to open the eyes of everyone in hopes we take the country back ourselves with other means aka the 2A. I think there is a plan but at the same time it's an informational plan for us and for us to use that information to justify our acts as we take the country back.

1
PeaceAndLovePatriot 1 point ago +3 / -2

It's actually a good breakdown. Set aside 107 prejudices and listen

1
Callmejuls 1 point ago +2 / -1

Can anyone break it down cause I can’t play video as I’m on road with crappy signal. Please.

1
pedewithweed 1 point ago +2 / -1

Lol Juan O Savin. 🤣

1
ravonaf 1 point ago +2 / -1

Let me guess. He just rattles off a bunch of numbers that don't make any sense.

0
DonkeyKongKillScreen 0 points ago +1 / -1

I grew sick of Juan and his empty promises. haven't watched his videos in awhile.

But holy crap this is a GREAT video. He really lays it out nicely.