Every single person that advocated taking away my rights for refusal? Fuck them. They apologize and admit they were wrong or i am done. They proved they are willing to Reich me down. My kids. My loved ones.
Agreed. I support the end goal and waking up as many individuals as possible even those who wanted to oppose us but accountability and reflection on their part is essential
Let me put it this way - the people who are still on board mindlessly doing the DS's work are lost 'souls'. Those in the back starting to think a little and get the juices flowing in their head deserve a chance at salvation. It's not entirely their fault they were being culled like sheep for years or more and if they show signs of humanity and open-mindedness now, it's better late than never. But everyone is entitled to an opinion..🤷♂️
As a pharmacist, I agree. We rely on that agency for everything. We trust them and we have to trust them to keep our products safe and effective. We can't trust Big Pharma. We need that third-party regulator. We tell our patients and customers what they're getting is safe and effective because that's what FDA says. We put our reputations and licenses on the line based on the information they provide.
This isn't something that'll be fixed with an apology. "Oops, muh bad." isn't going to cut it for those of us who have advised and encouraged thousands of people to use these products based on the data they supplied us. We weighed risk and benefit based on those data. We told patients they would benefit because that's what their data showed.
If they knowingly lied about the data and said it was safer than it was, there needs to be jail time. This is the kind of crime that should result in perp walks, trials, and jail time. It's the kind of crime that should result in a political house cleaning, mass firings, and the replacement of their leadership teams. This is a career-ending scandal for all of those cowardly white-collars who rubber stamped things they were supposed to reject. There needs to be cultural change and new transparency laws enacted. We need to have a very serious discussion about PDUFA (the Prescription Drug User Fee Act) that funds the FDA by asking pharma companies to pay FDA's budget so they can employ the people to evaluate their new drug applications. Having Big Pharma pay to evaluate their own products is clearly creating a conflict of interest and the safeguards in the original law have failed spectacularly.
And Pfizer needs to be run out of business. This isn't the first time they've been caught lying about the safety of their products. They hold the record for the biggest suit against them for lying. They didn't stop. They did it again. I've seen some of Pfizer's data. They're guilty as sin. I haven't seen the equivalent for Moderna, but I'm certain it's there because their promises were so similar. Perp walks, trials, bankruptcy, reckoning.
If they knowingly lied about the data and said it was safer than it was, there needs to be jail time. This is the kind of crime that should result in perp walks, trials, and jail time. It's the kind of crime that should result in a political house cleaning, mass firings, and the replacement of their leadership teams. This is a career-ending scandal for all of those cowardly white-collars who rubber stamped things they were supposed to reject. There needs to be cultural change and new transparency laws enacted. We need to have a very serious discussion about PDUFA (the Prescription Drug User Fee Act) that funds the FDA by asking pharma companies to pay FDA's budget so they can employ the people to evaluate their new drug applications. Having Big Pharma pay to evaluate their own products is clearly creating a conflict of interest and the safeguards in the original law have failed spectacularly.
Spot. On.
Thank you for the absolute clarity of your words.
The precedent is clear if we step back and look at Merck, Pfizer, Moderna, and more.
THEY DO NOT FEAR FALSIFYING STUDIES
This isn’t the first time - yes - an escalation, perhaps.
It’s no different that Banks Laundering Drug Money knowing that if they get caught it’s a slap on the wrist and a simple “cost of business”
Jail time. Anyone who was involved in this jail time. Just as there should have been epic jail time for what Merck did with VIOXX. Merck didn’t just lie - they conspired actively and really didn’t pay for what they did IMO.
It’s clear that either our Gov sides with We The People and our health or these businesses.
The fact Purdue Pharm has any access to their net worth is saying everything
I feel for you. You are in a really tough, untenable place. I have friends who KNOW pharmacists who have been like, "I can't completely trust/recommend these poisonous shots." It must be a horrible spot to be in...praying for you.
I've often seen comments on this site that not knowing is no excuse. Ok. But lets turn it around. You don't know - fine. Why are you forcing this on us? What happened to free choice? What happened to it's my body, and I'll decide? I guess that's ok if it's an inconvenient pregnancy....
When people are responsible for medical decisions such as doctors, nurses and this Mary Holland, it's their JOB to know. It's due diligence. They have to spend the time to do the research. Especially when bad side effects started coming out.
Some people are in a tough position. They were lied to, and the information they needed was kept from them. And I would not be surprised if Google, knowing their professions, directed them away from the truth. We know they are guilty of doing that anyway, and that they do extensive tracking of people's lives - how many of them are on Linked-In?
But when these same people are willing to take away people's free choice and medical freedoms, they've made a declaration that truth doesn't matter (they aren't questioning anything they are being told or seeing in practice), the science doesn't matter (science only works when it's fully exposed, peer reviewed, and backed up by non partisan research), personal freedom doesn't matter, and the Constitution doesn't matter. For many of them, the money they got from every clot shot mattered more than the consequences, which were becoming more evident with each passing day.
So while I agree with you, I also see shades of gray in that community. Some simply believed they were doing the right thing, but I've seen others who were militaristic in their belief about vaccines, and never questioned their right to force them on people.
You have a very generous view, that I understand and is nice.
But when you're in certain professions or have certain responsibilities you cannot afford to be ignorant. Legally and morally, it's part of your job responsibility. At the first hints of trouble they should have researched whatever they could.
When the jabs first came out, my husband asked if we should take them. I told him I have to check. I looked up what was new and different about these "vaccines". I read about nanoparticles and mRNA and I knew then they were bad. That lead me to Dr. Tenpenny, Dr. Zelenko, Dr. Madej and Dr. Mikovits. My mom, sister and brother took 2 jabs. I finally talked my mom out of the booster. Not really speaking to my brother or sister.
Even with ALL the information, now available, they are still giving Covid jabs today, and more people will die.
You cannot make Cyanide cupcakes and tell people it's their choice to eat them or not. They should never exist.
It's going to get interesting. My biggest concern is the unintended consequences of going after everyone in the medical profession who "should have known better". Need emergency care? Sorry, all the doctors are booked up with other emergency cases. Why? Because there are so few anymore. Why's that? Well, besides the ones in jail, very few are going into the medical field anymore.
That's why I think we're going to have to figure out a way to sift the wheat from the chaff.
I'm not saying you're wrong. I am suggesting that we need to be wise in how we deal with the criminal syndicate. And by that, I don't mean letting anyone off the hook. Some doctors, like Fauci, need to face capital punishment.
If the medical professional was ignorant or evil, both have a bad outcome.
Actually, I have a friend who had a doctor visit her. He took her son out in his expensive super-car. And he told her son he could have one someday if he becomes a doctor. He's in medical school right now.
I hope the main reason people get into the medical field is to help others.
Liberal governments believe they are the arbiters of truth, it's not a stretch to then believe that truth needs to be mandated by simply invoking the following; it would be immoral not to.
And this is allegedly inclusive of Pfizer’s clinical trials data. So this is the admission that they KNEW all along, BEFORE insisting the entire world wouldn’t be safe until everyone had taken it!!! Where’s the normie outrage???
We're only getting half the story with that 9 page list. You need numbers.
Ultimately, they'll claim (correctly) that the data are inconclusive. They're insufficient to show causation. That's correct. They are. So is VAERS. But neither system is designed to be. They're sentinel systems. They collect data and then, the people watching are supposed to investigate further when a signal is detected.
Pfizer's still culpable for not redoing their safety analyses. There was a question about safety, they were obliged to do a proper study that was sufficiently designed in order to get usable safety numbers. I'd go farther than that, personally. They were obliged to design that sentinel system to be transparent and usable in the first place. They damn sure didn't.
Keep in mind, all of this was still done prior to approval of Comirnaty. All of this was under EUA, all as part of a phase 3 clinical trial. Pfizer was legally obliged to report that data in full to FDA. And FDA was obliged to investigate further. FDA did a half-assed job of it, and they set it up in such a way as to allow themselves to conclude these adverse effects were rare. That's what they did with J&J's vax and TTS. That's what they did with Moderna's and the myocarditis warning. They put their thumb on the scale with their process and got the result they wanted so they could keep pushing this product. They wanted the product to succeed, so they ensured it.
To OffGridGuy: You are right. I stand corrected. This report contains a Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports through February 2021. I don’t think it’s necessarily limited to self-reported adverse events but, regardless, Pfizer was clearly aware of the magnitude and seriousness of adverse events for over an ENTIRE YEAR while it continued to push the vax with full support by government mandates while failing to disclose this devastating information. (Amazingly, all these adverse events are admittedly only from the date of authorization which was probably some time around November or December 2020 through February 2021–that means all these adverse events occurred in only 3 or 4 month time frame!)
Doctors, media, politicians, cops are all co-conspirators in this sick, wicked agenda. Greed and corruption have taken over in our world. Only God can save us from this wickedness. Turn to Jesus before it is too late.
Re: doctors. Some of them are. The vast majority aren't. They're simply following the data we were given. We have a system that works on trust. We trust the people who are providing the data from these studies to provide accurate data. We trust the peer review system. We trust the medical journals not to put their reputations on the line without being certain. We trust the FDA not to put its reputation on the line when it's not certain. We have to do that for the system to function.
The work flow for a primary care physician is such that he may need to see 35-40 patients a day, 15 minutes for each appointment. That's to stay in business. 15 minutes to see the patient, diagnose, recommend treatment, and document everything, then on to the next, otherwise reimbursement doesn't cover your operating costs.
You don't have time to spend chasing every datum in every study on every new drug that comes out. We have people whose job it is to do this full time. And the same goes for that corner drug store pharmacist who's job it is to fill 300-400+ prescriptions a day in order to keep his business running. He makes time to keep current on new drugs, but he has to trust that the data he's getting from the authorities is accurate.
The ones at the top are responsible here. Key word is: knowingly.
I respect you but I do not share your point of view. Doctors stood by and watched authorities lie to us about HCQ causing heart attacks and that Ivermectin is a horse de-wormer so that the vaccines could receive EUA. The vax manufacturers made billions of dollars off the vax and paid many physicians off handsomely to prescribe their pills and tout the vax narrative to the trusting sheeple.
I'm sorry, I don't buy the "I'm a busy doctor, I didn't have time to find out the truth about COVID, the "vaccinations", HCQ and Ivermectin". Nor do I buy the "I was just following orders" crap either. The simple fact is that doctors took money from Big Pharma to support their lies and wickedness and they should be brought to justice just like everyone else that committed crimes against humanity.
I'm with you. They also saw first hand the adverse reactions. Tell me a doctor who saw well-known, very healthy patients get very sick and/or die, did not put two and two together. They sacrificed people for their own pay check. Justice must come to everyone of these awful people.
Long overdue. Actually, the Clintons started the full scale take over of the health care industry back in the early 90s. They had the media on board hiding the truth of what they were really doing while they were publicly pushing the single payer system (what Obama care aspired to be).
So why isn’t everyone in Congress, CDC, MEDIA screaming that the FDA recall these Covid shots? It is because they are all corrupt: they don’t want the gravy train to stop and they want to press forward with the NWO agenda of depopulation, population control, vaccine passports which will control every aspect of your life.
Yes, they are invested in Big Pharma. They do not work for the people. That is why they were not screaming out about the mandates, how it goes against the Constitution and our freedoms. But many are all in for the NWO and that is why some in Congress try to bring up bills every year to take away our rights to bare arms.
He can twist it beautifully. “They said it was safe. All available science they provided said it was safe. So I was proud of what we accomplished. Looks like they lied, and people have been hurt or killed. They need to pay.”
The accepted explanation is that Trump had no option but to "warp speed" the jabs because the alternative was:
"oh, it takes 5 to 10 years to approve a jab so better be in lockdown until the jab is fully tested"
Then, the us and world economy fully destroyed, global communist totalitarian control, cyber economy with implants and no privacy and no cash and no freedom because "pandemic".
So, Trump knew there was no "good" choice so he embraced forcing release of jabs because at least there was a chance.
The implied assumption is that Trump knew the truly red pilled will support him but not take the jab.
He has NEVER EVER said mandating the jab was good. He has also never said anything implying he was an "anti-vaxxer" which prevents that avenue for the MSM to trash him.
Are we getting a clearer picture of when these people start having issues? There's a few close to me that are still in that 'under 6 months from 2nd shot' time frame.
I THINK someone has started having some issues. Randomly yesterday they were feeling run down, big headache that didn't go away and just overall feeling shitty. They took one of those rapid tests and it came back negative.
I've been preparing for this, just in case it IS real and the shots ARE as dangerous as they seem, but I don't know if I'm emotionally prepared to say good bye to some of these people.
I suspect it's going to be a mixed bag. I think they have figured out how to create receptors for the viruses they had planned to release. That way they could blame it on the next plan-demic. All the while stealing our money and health through the booster shots. Which that is why the bio-labs are now being exposed and some of them removed.
Must be true. I just got banned on Fake book for posting it. This makes me so mad, and them banning me makes me even moreso. I am over this whole thing and the damage they are doing to our children, then trying to sweep it under the rug.
I brought this up and was told that this list of adverse events were the ones being monitored for in the trial and not the adverse events that actually occurred.
What about J&J & Moderna? Are they releasing ingredients? Are the ingredients the same? I’m not understanding why one company is releasing ingredients and the other companies aren’t.
I think Moderna is the worst of a bad lot. J&J tried to avoid the mRNA vaccines, but that was quickly shutdown due to blood clot issues. I think they all had blood clot issues, but blaming it on J&J was convenient.
Not letting J&J off the hook. I suspect their turn is coming. Unless we find out that the DS was swapping vaccines to create a narrative - I would not rule that out.
I've got a theory that the blood clots are the result of the S-protein's action itself when it binds the ACE2 receptor. We haven't fully characterized that interaction. Given that so much of that occurs on the vascular endothelium, the inner-most cells lining your arteries and veins, it's logic that there's at least a possibility that something's happening that's making blood clots more likely.
What exactly? I don't know. I've heard thoughts that inflammation is part of the story, a bit like how atherosclerosis works. But we don't know.
What we do know is that microclots have been observed in people with active SARS-COV2 infection and in people who've been recently vaccinated. We know that people who are at little to no risk of clots are showing them.
It warranted more investigation than it got.
Blaming J&J's product was a bit of a farce. I'll admit I missed it early. What about J&J's product was the problem? The adenovirus? We had extensive data showing it did not cause such things. The inactive components, the buffers, etc? Again, we knew they didn't cause such things. It had to be the S-protein product. But no one asked questions. Just slap the warning on the box and go forward. So they did.
No one investigated because it's the same S-protein in all of the other products. The difference is just the delivery system. Honestly, we should've flagged it within the first 1-2 months when Astra Zeneca's adenovirus-based vaccine was causing clots all over Europe. FDA rejected their NDA here in the US over it, so they knew something was wrong. They just had no interest in learning "what something".
The problem is that this may not be the full story.
Some lots are worse than others. In fact only a small number of them, 1-2% of both Pfizer and Moderna account for >95% of all AE reports to VAERS. Most of those vaccines were fine and probably reflected the data we were getting from the companies, but 1-2% of the lots were ferocious. CDC collected the data. No one did the most basic analysis. It was FDA's job. Literally, FDA is required by law to inspect and certify those lots, and to monitor their side effects. It's very common for them to recall lots of various drugs because of contaminants. But they missed these. Or were they not looking? Some guy in Britain was looking. But the FDA wasn't? Something not on the ingredient list was going on and no one checked.
Very interesting information, thanks. I'm an engineer, so I'll be the first to admit this is outside my wheelhouse. But if I understand what you are saying, the SARS-COV2 is probably the underlying cause of the clots, and something in the vaccine (the S-protein) triggers an immune response that initiates extensive clot formation.
I still wonder if the deadly lots were sprinkled out to cause fear and increase the rate of vaccination (blame it on covid) , if they were "experimental" in the sense that different lots had a slightly different cocktail to find the most deadly, or if they were simply intended to start the depopulation process. I don't believe they were accidental. Yes, the possibility exists, but if the virus was not accidental (and there's plenty of evidence to support that it wasn't in spite of the government and MSM efforts to hide the information), then nothing about the vaccines are accidental either.
Is it possible the small number of bad lots actually points to something else?
Perhaps a similar small number of bad actors in a few select locations created fake VAERS entries for those specific lot numbers. Or some similar explanation that is not what everyone seems to automatically assume. Think about it...
That’s good! I’m hoping everything comes out! I have family that got the vax. (Just like many others here & around the world.) Thankfully one of my friends isn’t getting the boosters.
I find it so ironic that it actually used to be widely left wing held belief that Big Pharma was bad. Wasn't it a left wing thing to call out the dangers of vaccines at one time?
Bigot!!! Why do you think you are better than everyone else who takes the death VAX? You think you are above dying from the vaccine like everyone else? If it's good enough to kill minorities it's good enough to kill you. /s
No. And you won't get them. The data weren't collected in a way that you could determine AE frequency from them. No responsible scientist would attempt to take these data and generate such a list.
As for the argument about rare, look up some of those diseases. They are super rare. And we have, ostensibly, data from the entire population of the US here. Reports from ~200 million people. You're going to pick up all of those super-rare things. Remember, that the surveillance system requires ALL adverse effects to be reported, any new disease diagnosis. The kind of list you see here is quite typical of a large study, because in any large population, someone's going to have it.
The frequencies gets sorted out statistically afterwards. Again, these data weren't collected in a way that we could statistically calculate frequencies. In a proper trial, the researcher goes back through those long ass lists and asks whether the report was the result of background rates of these things or the result of the intervention they're testing. There's a lot of statistics involved, and frankly my eyes glaze over just thinking about it, so I'm not going to try and explain the statistical weed-out process - only that it is done. We reduce that list to a much smaller list of actual adverse effects of the intervention. That's what gets reported in the journal article and what gets put on the long form version of the FDA label.
This 9-page list is honestly, mostly meaningless, as much as people are making of it. I'm happy to watch Pfizer squirm over it, but this isn't the smoking gun we're looking for.
So you're saying in the trials they didn't keep track of how often these side effects happened?
Because that, to me, sounds like a horribly run trial. The entire point of the trials should be to pick up on any and all health outcomes and then compare to the baseline, so if we have no frequency data, what good does that do us?
Is anyone surprised by this information? God knew, they knew, we all knew for goodness sake! We can whine and say all we want now, but we should have risen up months ago. What...now that we have verification from their own documents it's going to make a hill a beans difference? I think not! Mark my words...nothing will be done...period!
They knew, the fda knew, The Who knew…..burn it all to the fucking ground
I am with you.
Not letting this go.
Full push.
Every single person that advocated taking away my rights for refusal? Fuck them. They apologize and admit they were wrong or i am done. They proved they are willing to Reich me down. My kids. My loved ones.
I WILL NEVER FORGET
Agreed. I support the end goal and waking up as many individuals as possible even those who wanted to oppose us but accountability and reflection on their part is essential
The people who turned Nazi are the ones incapable of self-reflection...
Let me put it this way - the people who are still on board mindlessly doing the DS's work are lost 'souls'. Those in the back starting to think a little and get the juices flowing in their head deserve a chance at salvation. It's not entirely their fault they were being culled like sheep for years or more and if they show signs of humanity and open-mindedness now, it's better late than never. But everyone is entitled to an opinion..🤷♂️
As a pharmacist, I agree. We rely on that agency for everything. We trust them and we have to trust them to keep our products safe and effective. We can't trust Big Pharma. We need that third-party regulator. We tell our patients and customers what they're getting is safe and effective because that's what FDA says. We put our reputations and licenses on the line based on the information they provide.
This isn't something that'll be fixed with an apology. "Oops, muh bad." isn't going to cut it for those of us who have advised and encouraged thousands of people to use these products based on the data they supplied us. We weighed risk and benefit based on those data. We told patients they would benefit because that's what their data showed.
If they knowingly lied about the data and said it was safer than it was, there needs to be jail time. This is the kind of crime that should result in perp walks, trials, and jail time. It's the kind of crime that should result in a political house cleaning, mass firings, and the replacement of their leadership teams. This is a career-ending scandal for all of those cowardly white-collars who rubber stamped things they were supposed to reject. There needs to be cultural change and new transparency laws enacted. We need to have a very serious discussion about PDUFA (the Prescription Drug User Fee Act) that funds the FDA by asking pharma companies to pay FDA's budget so they can employ the people to evaluate their new drug applications. Having Big Pharma pay to evaluate their own products is clearly creating a conflict of interest and the safeguards in the original law have failed spectacularly.
And Pfizer needs to be run out of business. This isn't the first time they've been caught lying about the safety of their products. They hold the record for the biggest suit against them for lying. They didn't stop. They did it again. I've seen some of Pfizer's data. They're guilty as sin. I haven't seen the equivalent for Moderna, but I'm certain it's there because their promises were so similar. Perp walks, trials, bankruptcy, reckoning.
Spot. On.
Thank you for the absolute clarity of your words.
The precedent is clear if we step back and look at Merck, Pfizer, Moderna, and more.
THEY DO NOT FEAR FALSIFYING STUDIES
This isn’t the first time - yes - an escalation, perhaps.
It’s no different that Banks Laundering Drug Money knowing that if they get caught it’s a slap on the wrist and a simple “cost of business”
Jail time. Anyone who was involved in this jail time. Just as there should have been epic jail time for what Merck did with VIOXX. Merck didn’t just lie - they conspired actively and really didn’t pay for what they did IMO.
It’s clear that either our Gov sides with We The People and our health or these businesses.
The fact Purdue Pharm has any access to their net worth is saying everything
I feel for you. You are in a really tough, untenable place. I have friends who KNOW pharmacists who have been like, "I can't completely trust/recommend these poisonous shots." It must be a horrible spot to be in...praying for you.
Jail time? How about executions? They are complicit in mass murder.
https://seemorerocks.is/the-secret-us-biolabs-in-ukraine/
They still need to be held accountable.
I've often seen comments on this site that not knowing is no excuse. Ok. But lets turn it around. You don't know - fine. Why are you forcing this on us? What happened to free choice? What happened to it's my body, and I'll decide? I guess that's ok if it's an inconvenient pregnancy....
It's too late for apologies and excuses.
When people are responsible for medical decisions such as doctors, nurses and this Mary Holland, it's their JOB to know. It's due diligence. They have to spend the time to do the research. Especially when bad side effects started coming out.
I don't see why she is acting shocked.
Some people are in a tough position. They were lied to, and the information they needed was kept from them. And I would not be surprised if Google, knowing their professions, directed them away from the truth. We know they are guilty of doing that anyway, and that they do extensive tracking of people's lives - how many of them are on Linked-In?
But when these same people are willing to take away people's free choice and medical freedoms, they've made a declaration that truth doesn't matter (they aren't questioning anything they are being told or seeing in practice), the science doesn't matter (science only works when it's fully exposed, peer reviewed, and backed up by non partisan research), personal freedom doesn't matter, and the Constitution doesn't matter. For many of them, the money they got from every clot shot mattered more than the consequences, which were becoming more evident with each passing day.
So while I agree with you, I also see shades of gray in that community. Some simply believed they were doing the right thing, but I've seen others who were militaristic in their belief about vaccines, and never questioned their right to force them on people.
You have a very generous view, that I understand and is nice.
But when you're in certain professions or have certain responsibilities you cannot afford to be ignorant. Legally and morally, it's part of your job responsibility. At the first hints of trouble they should have researched whatever they could.
When the jabs first came out, my husband asked if we should take them. I told him I have to check. I looked up what was new and different about these "vaccines". I read about nanoparticles and mRNA and I knew then they were bad. That lead me to Dr. Tenpenny, Dr. Zelenko, Dr. Madej and Dr. Mikovits. My mom, sister and brother took 2 jabs. I finally talked my mom out of the booster. Not really speaking to my brother or sister.
Even with ALL the information, now available, they are still giving Covid jabs today, and more people will die.
You cannot make Cyanide cupcakes and tell people it's their choice to eat them or not. They should never exist.
It's going to get interesting. My biggest concern is the unintended consequences of going after everyone in the medical profession who "should have known better". Need emergency care? Sorry, all the doctors are booked up with other emergency cases. Why? Because there are so few anymore. Why's that? Well, besides the ones in jail, very few are going into the medical field anymore.
That's why I think we're going to have to figure out a way to sift the wheat from the chaff.
I'm not saying you're wrong. I am suggesting that we need to be wise in how we deal with the criminal syndicate. And by that, I don't mean letting anyone off the hook. Some doctors, like Fauci, need to face capital punishment.
If the medical professional was ignorant or evil, both have a bad outcome.
Actually, I have a friend who had a doctor visit her. He took her son out in his expensive super-car. And he told her son he could have one someday if he becomes a doctor. He's in medical school right now.
I hope the main reason people get into the medical field is to help others.
Liberal governments believe they are the arbiters of truth, it's not a stretch to then believe that truth needs to be mandated by simply invoking the following; it would be immoral not to.
Their truth changes with the seasons. Our founding fathers clearly knew how that works when they wrote the constitution.
WE will never forget, pede.
o7
“I wish I had listened to you. My cousin overdosed.”
“I could have listened and just lived my life this past year without the fear.”
“These people don’t care about me. The jab took my health.”
I’ve heard it all: and I don’t enjoy it a bit.
What do you mean they knew? You should know by now that they did it on purpose and have been doing similar things on purpose since their beginning.
They KNEW.
NEVER FORGET. NEVER FORGIVE.
JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED.
Death to the tyrants
Take names first though. Don't want any rats sneaking away and hiding from their crimes.
And this is allegedly inclusive of Pfizer’s clinical trials data. So this is the admission that they KNEW all along, BEFORE insisting the entire world wouldn’t be safe until everyone had taken it!!! Where’s the normie outrage???
Normies are directing that at Putin right now, unfortunately.
No, this isn't. Look at the report title:
5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021
In other words Pfizer will say this is no different than VAERS.
We're only getting half the story with that 9 page list. You need numbers.
Ultimately, they'll claim (correctly) that the data are inconclusive. They're insufficient to show causation. That's correct. They are. So is VAERS. But neither system is designed to be. They're sentinel systems. They collect data and then, the people watching are supposed to investigate further when a signal is detected.
Pfizer's still culpable for not redoing their safety analyses. There was a question about safety, they were obliged to do a proper study that was sufficiently designed in order to get usable safety numbers. I'd go farther than that, personally. They were obliged to design that sentinel system to be transparent and usable in the first place. They damn sure didn't.
Keep in mind, all of this was still done prior to approval of Comirnaty. All of this was under EUA, all as part of a phase 3 clinical trial. Pfizer was legally obliged to report that data in full to FDA. And FDA was obliged to investigate further. FDA did a half-assed job of it, and they set it up in such a way as to allow themselves to conclude these adverse effects were rare. That's what they did with J&J's vax and TTS. That's what they did with Moderna's and the myocarditis warning. They put their thumb on the scale with their process and got the result they wanted so they could keep pushing this product. They wanted the product to succeed, so they ensured it.
Except Pfizer medically confirmed half of the reports
even VAERS is profoundly alarming and CAN NOT be ignored, even at whatever percent reported it is. The spike in adverse reactions is startling.
To OffGridGuy: You are right. I stand corrected. This report contains a Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports through February 2021. I don’t think it’s necessarily limited to self-reported adverse events but, regardless, Pfizer was clearly aware of the magnitude and seriousness of adverse events for over an ENTIRE YEAR while it continued to push the vax with full support by government mandates while failing to disclose this devastating information. (Amazingly, all these adverse events are admittedly only from the date of authorization which was probably some time around November or December 2020 through February 2021–that means all these adverse events occurred in only 3 or 4 month time frame!)
It should put an end to Pfizer, frankly
And a permanent end to the criminals involved.
Albert Bourla on a string.
Fauci on a string.
Gates on a string.
The list should ultimately be in the 10s of thousands.
Trust in the "healthcare" industry is now in the basement with media and politicians... We now have a very good reason to be wary of doctors..
Doctors, media, politicians, cops are all co-conspirators in this sick, wicked agenda. Greed and corruption have taken over in our world. Only God can save us from this wickedness. Turn to Jesus before it is too late.
Re: doctors. Some of them are. The vast majority aren't. They're simply following the data we were given. We have a system that works on trust. We trust the people who are providing the data from these studies to provide accurate data. We trust the peer review system. We trust the medical journals not to put their reputations on the line without being certain. We trust the FDA not to put its reputation on the line when it's not certain. We have to do that for the system to function.
The work flow for a primary care physician is such that he may need to see 35-40 patients a day, 15 minutes for each appointment. That's to stay in business. 15 minutes to see the patient, diagnose, recommend treatment, and document everything, then on to the next, otherwise reimbursement doesn't cover your operating costs.
You don't have time to spend chasing every datum in every study on every new drug that comes out. We have people whose job it is to do this full time. And the same goes for that corner drug store pharmacist who's job it is to fill 300-400+ prescriptions a day in order to keep his business running. He makes time to keep current on new drugs, but he has to trust that the data he's getting from the authorities is accurate.
The ones at the top are responsible here. Key word is: knowingly.
I respect you but I do not share your point of view. Doctors stood by and watched authorities lie to us about HCQ causing heart attacks and that Ivermectin is a horse de-wormer so that the vaccines could receive EUA. The vax manufacturers made billions of dollars off the vax and paid many physicians off handsomely to prescribe their pills and tout the vax narrative to the trusting sheeple.
I'm sorry, I don't buy the "I'm a busy doctor, I didn't have time to find out the truth about COVID, the "vaccinations", HCQ and Ivermectin". Nor do I buy the "I was just following orders" crap either. The simple fact is that doctors took money from Big Pharma to support their lies and wickedness and they should be brought to justice just like everyone else that committed crimes against humanity.
I'm with you. They also saw first hand the adverse reactions. Tell me a doctor who saw well-known, very healthy patients get very sick and/or die, did not put two and two together. They sacrificed people for their own pay check. Justice must come to everyone of these awful people.
I have and have had profound responses.
I’m using this right now to redpill my husband and make the argument that vaccines are NOT a safe bet for our kids.
Long overdue. Actually, the Clintons started the full scale take over of the health care industry back in the early 90s. They had the media on board hiding the truth of what they were really doing while they were publicly pushing the single payer system (what Obama care aspired to be).
I just uploaded this with 17 upvotes and 17 hours after you posted
So why isn’t everyone in Congress, CDC, MEDIA screaming that the FDA recall these Covid shots? It is because they are all corrupt: they don’t want the gravy train to stop and they want to press forward with the NWO agenda of depopulation, population control, vaccine passports which will control every aspect of your life.
You’re right. We can trust exactly NO ONE! Democrat or Republican, any and all current office holders are complicit. We the people have been sold out!
they don't want to be labeled as "anti-vaxxers."
Even though saying "this product seems to not be as safe as reported" does not imply "I am an anti-vaxxer" the MSM will imply this regardless.
In other words, they are pussies.
And, my guess is they are all heavily invested in Pharma.
Yes, they are invested in Big Pharma. They do not work for the people. That is why they were not screaming out about the mandates, how it goes against the Constitution and our freedoms. But many are all in for the NWO and that is why some in Congress try to bring up bills every year to take away our rights to bare arms.
Every time they do that Americans buy more guns.
And Moderna and Biontech.
He can twist it beautifully. “They said it was safe. All available science they provided said it was safe. So I was proud of what we accomplished. Looks like they lied, and people have been hurt or killed. They need to pay.”
This is the key phrase.
So now that this data is out, will Trump call for it to be recalled? Shouldn’t he? I feel like it’s time for him to say something.
The accepted explanation is that Trump had no option but to "warp speed" the jabs because the alternative was:
"oh, it takes 5 to 10 years to approve a jab so better be in lockdown until the jab is fully tested"
Then, the us and world economy fully destroyed, global communist totalitarian control, cyber economy with implants and no privacy and no cash and no freedom because "pandemic".
So, Trump knew there was no "good" choice so he embraced forcing release of jabs because at least there was a chance.
The implied assumption is that Trump knew the truly red pilled will support him but not take the jab.
He has NEVER EVER said mandating the jab was good. He has also never said anything implying he was an "anti-vaxxer" which prevents that avenue for the MSM to trash him.
yeah, I don't like it either. It sucks.
that's part of the thing lefties don't understand. I want Trump as POTUS because he's the best choice and did a lot of good things.
For me he's not disqualified for the jab thing. He never made me get it, and has said he wouldn't MAKE anyone get it.
So that's that. He's still the best choice.
They were warned.
By Q and Trump. I hope they have the naughty and nice list properly sorted out, and Santa isn't the one bringing the presents.
Are we getting a clearer picture of when these people start having issues? There's a few close to me that are still in that 'under 6 months from 2nd shot' time frame.
I THINK someone has started having some issues. Randomly yesterday they were feeling run down, big headache that didn't go away and just overall feeling shitty. They took one of those rapid tests and it came back negative.
I've been preparing for this, just in case it IS real and the shots ARE as dangerous as they seem, but I don't know if I'm emotionally prepared to say good bye to some of these people.
I suspect it's going to be a mixed bag. I think they have figured out how to create receptors for the viruses they had planned to release. That way they could blame it on the next plan-demic. All the while stealing our money and health through the booster shots. Which that is why the bio-labs are now being exposed and some of them removed.
Hearing about many getting sudden cancer diagnoses with no prior symptoms or issues. I think we're in early fallout stages still.
I'm surprised to see Yahoo posting this article by Children's Health Defense as well:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/chd-says-pfizer-fda-dropped-205400826.html
https://seemorerocks.is/the-secret-us-biolabs-in-ukraine/
Add this to it all…
An immediate end to the vaccines, and an immediate beginning to prosecutions and executions for crimes against humanity.
No deals.
Knowingly.
Must be true. I just got banned on Fake book for posting it. This makes me so mad, and them banning me makes me even moreso. I am over this whole thing and the damage they are doing to our children, then trying to sweep it under the rug.
How about PUT AN END TO PFIZER.
End Pfizer vaccines? It should end Pfizer!
even more-so end the FDA. If they saw these docs with the true data and STILL approved this garbage that is also criminal.
Follow the money.
CDC BLOOD PROFITEER LIAR WALENSKY ADMITS TO MASSIVE, ANTI-SCIENTIFIC, NUREMBERG-VIOLATING FAILURE
Tim Truth- https://www.bitchute.com/video/fn3h2nXxNHKB/
They (Pizer) and congress are going to treat themselves like they are "too big to fail".
And yet my local community is still pushing these jabs on our children.
I brought this up and was told that this list of adverse events were the ones being monitored for in the trial and not the adverse events that actually occurred.
Is anyone able to confirm this?
Found it, thanks https://rumble.com/vwje4j-dr.-robert-w.-malone-on-pfizer-documents-a-huge-list-of-adverse-events-of-i.html?fbclid=IwAR1gAyzoT05lCZgd0S7PX83sAiNye4OnMd29Urcl3DbKrc8jNM4ETil8hhs
What about J&J & Moderna? Are they releasing ingredients? Are the ingredients the same? I’m not understanding why one company is releasing ingredients and the other companies aren’t.
I think Moderna is the worst of a bad lot. J&J tried to avoid the mRNA vaccines, but that was quickly shutdown due to blood clot issues. I think they all had blood clot issues, but blaming it on J&J was convenient.
Not letting J&J off the hook. I suspect their turn is coming. Unless we find out that the DS was swapping vaccines to create a narrative - I would not rule that out.
I've got a theory that the blood clots are the result of the S-protein's action itself when it binds the ACE2 receptor. We haven't fully characterized that interaction. Given that so much of that occurs on the vascular endothelium, the inner-most cells lining your arteries and veins, it's logic that there's at least a possibility that something's happening that's making blood clots more likely.
What exactly? I don't know. I've heard thoughts that inflammation is part of the story, a bit like how atherosclerosis works. But we don't know.
What we do know is that microclots have been observed in people with active SARS-COV2 infection and in people who've been recently vaccinated. We know that people who are at little to no risk of clots are showing them.
It warranted more investigation than it got.
Blaming J&J's product was a bit of a farce. I'll admit I missed it early. What about J&J's product was the problem? The adenovirus? We had extensive data showing it did not cause such things. The inactive components, the buffers, etc? Again, we knew they didn't cause such things. It had to be the S-protein product. But no one asked questions. Just slap the warning on the box and go forward. So they did.
No one investigated because it's the same S-protein in all of the other products. The difference is just the delivery system. Honestly, we should've flagged it within the first 1-2 months when Astra Zeneca's adenovirus-based vaccine was causing clots all over Europe. FDA rejected their NDA here in the US over it, so they knew something was wrong. They just had no interest in learning "what something".
The problem is that this may not be the full story.
Some lots are worse than others. In fact only a small number of them, 1-2% of both Pfizer and Moderna account for >95% of all AE reports to VAERS. Most of those vaccines were fine and probably reflected the data we were getting from the companies, but 1-2% of the lots were ferocious. CDC collected the data. No one did the most basic analysis. It was FDA's job. Literally, FDA is required by law to inspect and certify those lots, and to monitor their side effects. It's very common for them to recall lots of various drugs because of contaminants. But they missed these. Or were they not looking? Some guy in Britain was looking. But the FDA wasn't? Something not on the ingredient list was going on and no one checked.
Very interesting information, thanks. I'm an engineer, so I'll be the first to admit this is outside my wheelhouse. But if I understand what you are saying, the SARS-COV2 is probably the underlying cause of the clots, and something in the vaccine (the S-protein) triggers an immune response that initiates extensive clot formation.
I still wonder if the deadly lots were sprinkled out to cause fear and increase the rate of vaccination (blame it on covid) , if they were "experimental" in the sense that different lots had a slightly different cocktail to find the most deadly, or if they were simply intended to start the depopulation process. I don't believe they were accidental. Yes, the possibility exists, but if the virus was not accidental (and there's plenty of evidence to support that it wasn't in spite of the government and MSM efforts to hide the information), then nothing about the vaccines are accidental either.
Is it possible the small number of bad lots actually points to something else?
Perhaps a similar small number of bad actors in a few select locations created fake VAERS entries for those specific lot numbers. Or some similar explanation that is not what everyone seems to automatically assume. Think about it...
That’s good! I’m hoping everything comes out! I have family that got the vax. (Just like many others here & around the world.) Thankfully one of my friends isn’t getting the boosters.
Remember when they said that if you got the original J&J vaccine, that you were not considered vaccinated? What did they really mean by that?
I don’t know, I’ve read so much it all runs together. Is that the saline? Or is it because it’s not stopping Covid & introducing other diseases?
Will they end it though?
Will any part of the mainstream narrative ever be “big Pharma bad”?
I find it so ironic that it actually used to be widely left wing held belief that Big Pharma was bad. Wasn't it a left wing thing to call out the dangers of vaccines at one time?
Yes - just like the left use to be against the big banks.
Now someone the left has been turned into the foot soldiers for big Pharma and big banks. I have no idea how this happened, or how it makes any sense.
Bigot!!! Why do you think you are better than everyone else who takes the death VAX? You think you are above dying from the vaccine like everyone else? If it's good enough to kill minorities it's good enough to kill you. /s
Does anyone have any graphics or listed frequencies for the side effects?
Trying to share data and people are like 'well these were obviously super rare', so counter to that would be great.
No. And you won't get them. The data weren't collected in a way that you could determine AE frequency from them. No responsible scientist would attempt to take these data and generate such a list.
As for the argument about rare, look up some of those diseases. They are super rare. And we have, ostensibly, data from the entire population of the US here. Reports from ~200 million people. You're going to pick up all of those super-rare things. Remember, that the surveillance system requires ALL adverse effects to be reported, any new disease diagnosis. The kind of list you see here is quite typical of a large study, because in any large population, someone's going to have it.
The frequencies gets sorted out statistically afterwards. Again, these data weren't collected in a way that we could statistically calculate frequencies. In a proper trial, the researcher goes back through those long ass lists and asks whether the report was the result of background rates of these things or the result of the intervention they're testing. There's a lot of statistics involved, and frankly my eyes glaze over just thinking about it, so I'm not going to try and explain the statistical weed-out process - only that it is done. We reduce that list to a much smaller list of actual adverse effects of the intervention. That's what gets reported in the journal article and what gets put on the long form version of the FDA label.
This 9-page list is honestly, mostly meaningless, as much as people are making of it. I'm happy to watch Pfizer squirm over it, but this isn't the smoking gun we're looking for.
So you're saying in the trials they didn't keep track of how often these side effects happened?
Because that, to me, sounds like a horribly run trial. The entire point of the trials should be to pick up on any and all health outcomes and then compare to the baseline, so if we have no frequency data, what good does that do us?
Is anyone surprised by this information? God knew, they knew, we all knew for goodness sake! We can whine and say all we want now, but we should have risen up months ago. What...now that we have verification from their own documents it's going to make a hill a beans difference? I think not! Mark my words...nothing will be done...period!