284
Comments (109)
sorted by:
38
Banditos 38 points ago +51 / -13

This post reads less elegantly than the old Q. Aware of the supposed deltas tonight but something feels off here. Hope I'm wrong

28
FractalizingIron 28 points ago +29 / -1

au contraire.

Reads very Q-ish. Note: this is a post by the tripcoded Q account, not non-tripcode supposedly "delta" "Q" posts being bandied about.

30
UnbreakablePatriot 30 points ago +33 / -3

The tripcoded q account is being called into question because it has no deltas and the watkins lies and board fuckery. And i agree having read all the drops this doesn't have the same voice at all. It's clonky. I could be wrong.

11
UltimateMastermind 11 points ago +11 / -0

I agree with you.

And I don´t think this helps us in any way. We already know what to do when truth comes to light. Spread it, meme the shit out of opposition. We don´t need to know what Q team is going to do exactly, why and what to focus on at this point. Hive mind can catch any significant message at this point I believe.

3
Boomahremovah 3 points ago +4 / -1

Sounds like the Original Q before the bots made them start typing in broken sentences with tons of symbols to throw off text reading.

4
Riggs99 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah. With all the questions and long absence..need a rock solid newTrump/Q+ proof.

2
ObamaSucks 2 points ago +3 / -1

Anon delta from 8 Chan ;

https://ibb.co/L8JKYht

Accurate??

3
UnbreakablePatriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Could be but then these posts have the problem of no trip code.

The trip code posts have the no deltas problem plus odd rhythm and cadence in the speech.

I'm just going to wait and see how it plays out.

17
AbibasGopnik 17 points ago +24 / -7

Casting doubt on Q is clearly the new shill tactic.

17
DarkSamus61 17 points ago +17 / -0

I have been here since the election. With all the weirdness of the posting and oddities surrounding the return. I am skeptical. I don't doubt the old Q stuff at all, but I think its a good thing to be skeptical when things seem off. When proof's roll in, it feels much better to be able to debunk criticisms with logic, rather than emotion.

I want these to be real but I also don't want to be blindly trust things. So unfortunately I do have a "old Q" and "new Q" category until my mind can decide what is what.

17
kkthxk 17 points ago +17 / -0

Trust but verify. This isn't a cult, people need to use their noggin's or the cycle never ends.

4
DarkSamus61 4 points ago +4 / -0

Right, when people call it a cult, I laugh because most conversation's here involve deciphering information and articles and trying to piece together a bigger picture of event's. Even if Q didn't exist I still like this kind of research and find it very eye opening what can be deciphered when looking at things on a larger scale.

When you blindly trust, then what are people suppose to think when someone calls you a cult member and your response is also cult like? That's not really how you change peoples minds.

3
MAGA_mandalorian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly. And honestly it would be very un-Q of us to fully believe this is the OG Q posting without doing any digging or research. It intrinsically goes against everything Q was teaching us. Verify everything, trust nothing, dig for yourself. Edit: well except trusting God and the plan, but that's about far as trust goes in relation to Q

-1
ARandomOgre -1 points ago +4 / -5

Kind of wish this phrase would disappear. “Trust but verify” isn’t a thing.

The definition of trust is not having to verify things all the time. If you’re verifying constantly, you don’t trust it. By definition.

When was the last time you had someone taste-test a meal for poison when it was provided by your spouse?

When was the last time you asked your boss to verify their identity so that you knew you weren’t working for a fraud?

When was the last time you cautiously approached the old family dog that has never bitten anyone in his life?

Are you not verifying the things you trust in your life?

The only phrase that makes sense is “verify, then trust.” THAT is how you avoid ending up in a cult mindset. Once you start trusting people promoting the thing you’re studying, you’re already losing your ability to research it properly.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
DarkSamus61 1 point ago +1 / -0

I definitely see both perspectives here's. Of course this is now getting in the area of semantics.

It might be easier to look into at the context its used.

In my opinion I look at trust, but verify more like taking a matter seriously but still being open to new information that could prove otherwise.

Like if someone is alleges sexual assault on someone else. You can take the accusation seriously while still wanting proof. Of course this is a different matter but I think there are similarities in how to process new information.

In this case I am not throwing out any of the statements made by Q I am just simply filing them away until something validates them. I like to remain open minded to all new information and opinions on it. It prevents getting too emotionally attached to a cause and saves headache long run imo.

-2
ARandomOgre -2 points ago +2 / -4

This phrase was used to describe to Reagan how he should interact with the Soviets regarding nuclear power.

These are the same Soviets (historically) that are responsible for Operation Trust, BTW, and that very much relied on trusting people being fooled into thinking they were verifying. Which is how they were able to capture Reilly and Savinkov.

It might be good advice when dealing with public-facing international politics against an equal-level nuclear power.

Not really good advice for a research site. At all.

2
MAG768720 2 points ago +4 / -2

Clearly, there is a question about authenticity.

The good news is this: we are questioning this after only 4 of these drops. So, we ARE using critical thinking, as a group.

Proceed with caution is a good position, unless and until solid confirmation comes in.

However, we can still analyze the drops from both Real and LARP perspectives.

Was Hutchinson's story believable?

No.

So, why would LARP/psyop want to push the idea that she was a plant?

What would be the benefit?

Clearly, it would be something Real Q would want to reveal, but Fake Q?

-2
DarkSamus61 -2 points ago +1 / -3

I get what your saying. I think we will find out in time. I have no problem being patient and having things proven as it comes. After all many Q posts are also not brought to light til years later!.

As far as what a Fake Q's motives would be, that is up in the air.

But in my mind lets say I hypothetically had access to Q's account and I wanted to play games on it.

My first goal would be to establish trust. Even if I believed Hutchinson's story I absolutely would pretend not. Any real agenda or change of direction would need to happen slowly and subtlety to avoid people catching on. If your a bad actor and your any good at it, I feel like you would put in the work to establish trust.

Not saying that's what is happening. But motives is something that very hard to really know and so I can't go off of that as a reason to trust alone. Maybe as a overall trend or on a checklist but undeniable proofs are unfortunately the only real way to verify 100%.

7
redtoe-skipper 7 points ago +7 / -0

In a previous era Q used the term: critical thinking. Now he added the pronoun: YOUR to it.

This makes it much more direct.

21
Greatheart 21 points ago +24 / -3

We should not have to hope that this is the real Q. We start going down that road and we are no different that the people that blindly believe whatever the main stream media says.

Q would not expect us to just have faith without proof. So until there is proof everything that is posted is suspect.

8
LongDongDonald420x69 8 points ago +9 / -1

little late to the party on that one dawg 🤣😂

4
Greatheart 4 points ago +6 / -2

I agree, been saying this for days.

6
LongDongDonald420x69 6 points ago +9 / -3

What I saw come from our own people over the last 2 years truly shook me. The same people calling out fake news and media lies were falling right into the same trap, getting swept up into the hype of miniature cult of personalities (not naming names, but I shouldn't have to.) just because they were saying the right things. And if you dare questioned the narrative, you got ostracized and in some cases even banned depending on the "icon of the day". It was just another flavor of the same shit. It's definitely gotten better, as one can only promise things with no tangible results for so long, but it was truly frightening seeing it happen in real time. I think it's what fractured us, really got the infighting flowing and opened the door for obvious social manipulation. I'm terrified it's going to happen again, if not even worse.

6
Greatheart 6 points ago +7 / -1

In a way we are all still just in the waking up stage.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
MAGA_mandalorian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep you're on the nose. I may be in a later stage of awake than normies, but I'm still constantly learning new things and being woken up the further into this I go. We're not even close to the whole truth, and that's exciting for me because I can only imagine what truths God will reveal to us! The true history of the world is a big one for me as a history buff. It always fascinated me, and I've always had this itch in the back of my mind telling me there's more to our story than we are being told

3
kkthxk 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fear nothing. Some people will choose a new golden calf to dance around as many times as necessary for them to understand the fundamental truth of all things. Some have to learn these lessons much longer than others.

2
MAG768720 2 points ago +2 / -0

BIG difference between (a) fake news that never provides any evidence to back up their claims, and (b) someone who provides proofs that they are associated with Trump.

They are not the same, at all.

So far, we do not have a definitive ID on "New Q," so questioning is normal. Have to wait and see, but we can still analyze from both Real Q and LARP/Psyop Q perspectives.

If New Q is not Real Q, it will become harder and harder to fake it. It will fizzle out on its own.

1
LongDongDonald420x69 1 point ago +1 / -0

The reason I didn't name names is because I wasn't talking about Q. I was talking about all the people that rode the wave of people interested in stuff, started using the same lingo, etc etc.

2
An_Extinct_DQDQ_Bird 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trust but verify.

This board is a roller-coaster as of late and reeks of absurd confusion.

1
jackrotten 1 point ago +1 / -0

The fact that the posts that are being critical of the new Q stuff or showing skepticism are being brigaded with downvotes are exactly why we should be skeptical of the new Q posts. We don't know the level of infiltration on this site. It could be a fake Q with shills here trying to shut down the idea that it's a fake Q.

I will remain skeptical until there is a Trump verification of this return of Q. That is the most logical thing to do, in my opinion.

1
Banditos 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah all of these new posts I have to categorize into the same mental compartment as the Truth Social Q account. More data is always welcome, one way or another. BUT this is the first drop on any platform this year that doesn't completely pass the smell test for me.

I hate to say it but it reads like an aspergers impression of the writing style. Too many repeated keywords, it has no flow, and it repeats itself over and over to convey the same basic concepts line after line. It's not that the old Q posts were verbose poetry, but they had a haiku like cadence that expanded your awareness and often left the reader with a cathartic light bulb flickering on in your mind's eye.

2
JDMAGA77 2 points ago +2 / -0

Perhaps the lightbulb is already on and your present awareness has subdued the tranquil cadence that caught your attention before? Perhaps it lost its shimmer because the novelty has been tarnished. Or by golly you are right, and the recent Q is a fraud. ✌️

2
Cuetardian 2 points ago +2 / -0

"...a haiku like cadence that expanded your awareness and often left the reader with a cathartic light bulb flickering on in your mind's eye."

u sure u not q?

Nice.

3
hippielouie 3 points ago +3 / -0

w several on the Q team, this couldn't this have been written by someone we haven't heard from before?

1
jackrotten 1 point ago +1 / -0

It wouldn't make sense for them to suddenly deviate like this. That would certainly break trust.

3
TheTurbot 3 points ago +9 / -6

Agreed. This doesn’t seem like q

1
jackrotten 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree also and it's clear that the shills downvoting your post aren't really Q believers, because anyone that's been following this for years know that the skepticism is healthy, especially with lack of a solid Trump confirmation.

2
TheMAGAnificent 2 points ago +2 / -0

I 100% agree, as someone who writes, and has written almost daily for over a decade, this does feel different.

BUT I will say this: the first 1000 Q posts read like a spy novel: like you're peering into a well vetted, extremely compelling set of vignettes written and checked by multiple people.

As time goes on, the quality changes, but that's because the original 1000 (give or take) have been prepared for at least a decade. Then everything after becomes adapting on the fly as Q and crew adjust to the cabals responses.

This new post is no different: this can't be well vetted and trip coded, as Q is responding to what's going on.

Is it part of the plan? According to Q. But will every post be given the same Q post 100 feel? Doubtful, and honestly, humanly impossible. At nearly 5000 posts, there's gonna be ones that don't feel the same.

Not ever page in GRRMs Game of Thrones novels is a masterpiece, nor will every Q post feel like Jason Bourne.

1
Banditos 1 point ago +1 / -0

True, some posts were in a different format altogether than the famous socratic questioning that Q has come to be known for. However this post doesn't read as a new style or format, but rather a poor impression of the ubiquitous Q posts of old.

Too many repeated keywords, little to no flow, and repeats itself multiple times to convey the same basic concepts line after line. It's not that the old Q posts were verbose poetry, but they had a haiku-like cadence that expanded your awareness and often left the reader with a cathartic light bulb flickering on in your mind's eye by post's end.

2
TheMAGAnificent 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree. Honestly I doubt it's authenticity more than I trust it, but I want to trust it

20
Qanaut 20 points ago +20 / -0

Is Q saying that Cassidy Hutchinson is a Judas Goat?

Did the White Hats plant her in the J6 hearings in order to derail their agenda?

Who indeed was surprised?

I don't think it was the Patriots. We've seen this play out before with Juicy Smollett, and have come to expect this sort of thing. Perhaps it was the J6 committee that was surprised that their super secret star witness was not what they expected.

Yesterday's ridiculous story was so ludicrous that most Americans could see right through it. Perhaps this story was intended to chip away at the remaining folks who still believe in the J6 narrative.

3
Mister_Winston 3 points ago +3 / -0

Remember when some radio talkshow guys baited Adam Schiff into believing some bogus story about Trump, and recorded their conversation with Schiff? He was salivating and took every word they said as fact.

"Can emotions be used to influence decisions?"

Schiff will believe anything. Planting bogus witness with a ridiculous story would be easy, and would discredit the committee.

3
Notimportant81 3 points ago +3 / -0

So, has anyone looked into who she is

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
Orangetastic 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sure sounds to me like Q is giving us an invitation/suggestion/order to aim the autists at Cassidy Hutchinson and see what gets dug up.

2
fazzman23 2 points ago +2 / -0

i thought this too....it was so ridiculous not even Cheney and the Dems are this dumb, plus the SS immediately said it was a lie

4
buzzsaw3364 4 points ago +4 / -0

Did you forget this is a movie with actors in order to wake up the sleepers...

2
MAGA_mandalorian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well that Biden actor deserves an award. To be able to play a smooth brain pedo with dementia for that long and that well is most impressive indeed. I would've cracked myself up too many times trying to say those ridiculous things 🤣

12
MikelovesTrump 12 points ago +12 / -0

Fake Q or not. I was thinking the exact same thing this morning driving to work. This interview made claims so outrageous that they’re now turning the D party into laughing stocks.

10
Sniping88 10 points ago +11 / -1

Posted AFTER we had already learnt two people were going to testify under oath that she lied. I'm hesitant here.

4
MrsBitterButter 4 points ago +5 / -1

Yeah, even though I came to all of this late, I'm also a little hesitant. Her testimony was debunked almost as soon as it happened. Even some in the lame stream media were reporting that. I am reserving my buy-Im but am cautiously optimistic.

2
MAGA_mandalorian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ditto fren. Ditto. It would also be very un-Q of us to fully believe this is the OG Q before digging and researching first to verify. Just throwing that out there as well

1
MAG768720 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, Q is not going to post publicly that she is a plant BEFORE she testifies.

And the SS and limo driver made their statements immediately after she was done.

I think your concern is misplaced on this one.

2
ThePowerOfPrayer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Jeremiah 17:5

Thus saith the Lord; Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the Lord.

Micah 7:5-7

5 Trust ye not in a friend, put ye not confidence in a guide: keep the doors of thy mouth from her that lieth in thy bosom.

6 For the son dishonoureth the father, the daughter riseth up against her mother, the daughter in law against her mother in law; a man's enemies are the men of his own house.

7 Therefore I will look unto the Lord; I will wait for the God of my salvation: my God will hear me.

The latest Q posts haven't been verified as they were in the past. The salts were changed but Jim Watkins claims Q's tripcode was somehow whitelisted from salt changes.

Does Watkins benefit financially from increasing traffic to 8kun?

u/#q3182

1
MAGAdeburger 1 point ago +1 / -0

v8power pointed out that it would appear that Ron will have some more free time given his status in Arizona...

1
v8power 1 point ago +1 / -0

v8power pointed out...

I noted (privately and off this platform) that Ron's debate and fundraising performance appears to seriously lag his competitors, and Ron may lose the race on August 2nd. If so, he'll have time for other pursuits.

If he already believes he'll lose, he could transition into something else now.

Does Watkins benefit financially from increasing traffic to 8kun?

8kun has it's own branded coffee, so technically "yes."

It has been reported that Ron loaned $95k to his campaign.

Coincidentally, he set a goal to raise $100k in the last month of his race.

The salts were changed but Jim Watkins claims Q's tripcode was somehow whitelisted from salt changes.

This doesn't make any sense: Q wants to be locked in to an old SALT that may have been compromised? That would leave the account just as vulnerable to hacking as before the SALT was implemented.

8
TSearch 8 points ago +9 / -1

The interesting thing about this post is Anons were hours ahead on the whole Cassidy Hutchinson testimony. There is nothing revealed in this post that Anons had not already considered and discussed.

So what is the purpose of this post? Anons already considered the possibility she is WH plant. And Anons already, almost instantaneously participated in discrediting her ridiculous testimony.

Gues we’ll have to wait for future proves past on these new posts.

0
Europa 0 points ago +2 / -2

Purpose of this Q post is to shake the shite out of the DS

1
MAG768720 1 point ago +1 / -0

Could be.

From DS perspective, "Oh shit! We fell for a trap? Who ELSE is a trap?"

1
Europa 1 point ago +1 / -0

We’ll it’s not us that is for sure.

So it is for the Deep State, J6 Committee and the ….MSM.

They all look stupid right now.

Q scares them on an ordinary post…this one on “Cassidy” is over the top.

They HAVE to be wondering now..even more than us…is this the real Q posting again?

Imagine their terror

1
HunnyB 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right. She could be one of our plants just put there to make fools of the committee. They were trying to use emotions, make Trump look angry, instead it got immediately debunked, people have been put on an emotional rollercoaster with Trump since forever, people are finally getting sick of the ride, getting off and looking at what's really going on.

She was going to work for Geotus in Florida after Jan 20

7
Taran77 7 points ago +9 / -2

I have a theory on the new Q posts. I do not think these posts are just 100% meant for old Anons. The past Q posts were telling us what was GOING to happen. This is how the deltas lined up. The new Q posts are giving us thoughts and explanations for what is CURRENTLY happening. There are millions of new Anons than there were years ago. Some of them are confused on todays current affairs and Q posting is helping them through the process. So it only makes sense that the new Q posts will read a bit different than the last.

5
GhettoRothschild 5 points ago +5 / -0

There are anons who think @Q on Truth Social is the real Q, but I do notice a difference in @Q’s voice. On the contrary, Revenant Q on the 8kun boards looks like legit old school Q to me. But what do I know?

6
Razo 6 points ago +6 / -0

Truth Social Q admitted they are not the old 8kun Q.

1
GhettoRothschild 1 point ago +1 / -0

As I recall, @Q was vague about it (unless something was posted more recently that I missed). It was something to the effect of “not the Q you want me to be” which could mean he isn’t 8kun Q, or it could mean he isn’t JFK Jr (considering how many anons wanted that, at least 2020 and prior), or any of the other theories on who Q is. It’s possible (probable even) that I’m over-thinking it, but I’m not quite satisfied with that answer.

1
JackieDaytona74 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think this is an excellent point T77, and I would agree. I strongly suspect that there are more Q followers who have joined the fight after Q stopped posting than there was at that point.

Stands to reason that initial drops are going to be a bit more on the nose.

As to Q's authenticity, all we need to see are some Q/Trump TS deltas, which I would imagine are forthcoming.

1
QPLUSWONBIGLY 1 point ago +1 / -0

Q of 2020 talked about blm, election, antifa, laptop from hell etc. as it was unfolding

1
conspiracynomore 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's an interesting theory, but thinking of it like this:

If you were Q and you spent years making predictions you knew would be realized ("future proves past"), would you return randomly and start commenting on current events?

Or would you be patient and wait until the happenings had begun (indictment unseals, major arrests, Declas) and then make a bigger return once a wider portion of the population were red-pilled and anticipating new drops?

1
Notimportant81 1 point ago +1 / -0

Totally logical. No expert but wouldn't your comms be different in the storm?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
MagaMan1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

TOTAL FAILURE

She's a 6

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
Boomahremovah 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Ok Cassidy, now tell them I threw my tendies at the wall and screamed "ARE YOU NOT DINNERTAINED!"

3
Analophigus 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think its Q. 🤷🏼‍♀️

2
jackrotten 2 points ago +3 / -1

This doesn't pass my sniff test. It's sloppy and late.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Cuetardian 2 points ago +2 / -0

No killboxes. No cryptic abbreviations. Just very simple text. That's why if feels "off" to me.

The Q team did not write that way.

This reads like a highschooler wrote it - a highschooler with no knowledge of military style writing.

I think most all of the "new Q" posts have been the same way.

2
TurdFergueson2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Plants are inserted as seeds I would imagine. (Lots of info on plants from the farm that need watered out there, look it up, comms)

And I would say emotions could be used to insert a plant even if that, "plant" is just merely an idea.

I need to research Cassidy, at work though.

Looks like a legit Q post to me, just my opinion though.

Maxwell and Jan 6th are converging.

And Roe v Wade Overturned, just threw a huge wrench into A LOT of money for these people.

This is getting crazy.

Let's GoooOOoOOOOO!!

u/#lightning

2
Grimby 2 points ago +2 / -0

Think there will be another surprise witness?

2
TheTurbot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Julian Assange

2
MAGA_mandalorian 2 points ago +2 / -0

If that happens I might actually crap myself. That would be lit

2
hogimus 2 points ago +2 / -0

This was posted by Q today?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Foomer 1 point ago +1 / -0

WHERE IS THE ZERO DELTA

1
Chimera 1 point ago +1 / -0

Q doesn't usually answer all the questions he posits in the next line does he? Could have easily just said: Cassidy Hutchinson is a plant.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Cuttinmuffins 1 point ago +2 / -1

Pretty weak post there. Reads like a lib shill fake q post when they used to do that shit. Just saying.

1
VetforTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hmmm

0
MoniQuesmith303 0 points ago +1 / -1

Did you notice Trump called her "Whacko" ? He used a capital W. Like what the tabloids used to call Michael Jackson? Anons, check into this? Maybe a comm? About MJ?

0
GreenRoar 0 points ago +1 / -1

Q has been back for less than a week and people already throwing doubt. I remember people having the same doubts about the 'old' Q. My approach is to suspend judgement and allow the drops to explain themselves. If it doesn't make sense to you, stop reading them. There... problem solved.

0
John_Mac_n_Cheese 0 points ago +1 / -1

You insert a plant by first removing some soil. SOIL ---> drop the "S" = OIL. Removing oil.

TRUMP HEARD THE DEATH KNOCK UNDER THE HOOD AND KNEW THEY NEEDED AN OIL CHANGE FAST!

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
-2
7331XSS -2 points ago +2 / -4

Use Logic

Use your Logic

There should be only 1 logic. Your logic sounds off to me

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
-3
1
MAGAdeburger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wonder why the downvotes? 🤔

1
v8power 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cognitive dissonance? 🤔