It’s sad to say, but my skepticism is such that all such acts of overt altruism, charity and philanthropy must now be viewed through the prism of cover and villainy. What is institutional capture but the very notion of otherwise good, civil, organised intentions at scale that have been corrupted, infiltrated and even weaponised for endlessly nefarious ends? The criminality and deception pervades so much that I consider it the rule, not the exception, until proven otherwise.
The mechanism of trust have always interested me. I trust God alone. This world is so bizarre at times I would not be surprised if a lamb bit me and a snake saved me. The ways of God are not the ways of man. We just never know. Until we do, forever. God drops us hints, but it's our job to dig and stand on our well meaning and diligently formed conviction.
That's why it's so important to bear witness of God in your life to others. They are getting the drops but might need help reading the comms.
The only ones who might "get away with it" are the ones in the middle of all of it turncoating on the others. On the one hand you might think "no exceptions there must be justice" to which I go, "sure, but if they hadn't been involved and they hadn't turned, there would be NO justice. So at the very least there will be lesser punishments for those who cooperate, but don't expect the hanging tree for every pedo.
Hmm, that's not really all that true though. Sacrificing worldly treasure for the benefit of others could absolutely be repentance, and he could be used as a vehicle to protect and save other children.
It's not repentance to God that is the issue in cases like this; remember that God gives the final judgement, not you or I.
What is the issue is that if true, there is Earthly justice that needs to be meted out.
Ikr. Look at the name of that period rag. The name jezebel says it all fuck that shit it will go the way of it’s name sake- tossed out an window and eaten by stray curs lmao.
Just looked it up on the net - Stary broke two hours ago. A lot of pedos hang with the opposite side to hide their evil little lives. Common
Also, the movie staff wasn't going to background check every donor. Duh.
Trying so hard to defend the pedos and discredit the movie. Typical Yahoo stuff
Yep like how they were earlier running stories about Carlos Slim being a funder to try to drive people away from the movie. That didn't work so they're stepping it up.
"According to the Missouri Courts website, Marta was charged July 21 with child kidnapping, a felony." What child? Is he the non-custodial parent or is this something else? Too many questions no one is asking and no one is offering up. I'm gonna bet this is another bullshit story designed to knock down "Sound of Freedom." I for one am not buying into the bullshit.
Thankfully the 3rd top comment addressed the crux of the lawsuit.
The wording in that charge reeks of disinfo. Is he a non-custodial parent? Was he helping the child escape parental abuse? The possibilities are endless.
Saw this on a lib friend's social media, so I immediately knew it would be misleading. I was right.
Marta was one of 6600+ people who donated an average of $500 toward making the movie. So he was more like a gofundme donor, hardly a "financier" as the headline deceptively states.
And we don't know if this charge is a custody battle or what the facts are. Whatever it is, bet the farm it's nothing related to human trafficking.
There's been debate about some of money interests behind Sound of Freedom. One of those characters is Carlos Slim, a man with connections to Mexican cartels, Hillary Clinton, and Hunter Biden. Why did he fund the film?
Most philanthropists come from ruthless, wicked pasts. It's only in their senior years they offer to give back a pittance of the wealth that they stole. Evil people love to hide behind the bright light of good deeds.
They also spread around their money to try to obscure their donations to the more nefarious causes. I'm somewhat reminded of the Agatha Christie story "The ABC Murders" where only one of the victims was the true target the others were unfortunate people randomly chosen to cause the police to run around looking for a serial killer and the murder had a patsy set up as well. A similar plot was used in Law & Order where only one of the three victims was the actual target but because the three victims were black, latino, and asian the cops were initially chasing a suspected white supremacist for the first half of the episode.
They think karma works as the currency of God. Dumb fuckers. God has NO regard for man apart from Christ and those in His shadow. Fuck luciferian khazarian knights of pythias fuckers and their god. (btw iphone shit keyboard doesn’t recognize luciferian or khazarian as words lmao)
Reminds me of the pastors of churches where they would rail and scream from the pulpit about how evil homosexuality is (often to the point the pastor became known for that specific thing in the community) and those engaging in that sin are going to hell and on and on. Of course the pastor is not wrong that it is a sin according to scripture and not wrong that people living in that perversion lifestyle do need redemption and salvation in Jesus which would also lead to repentance. But often these preachers were over the top angry, vitriolic, aggressive and over focused on that single issue in their presentation.
Fast forward a few months or years and the same pastor ends up being outed as engaging in homosexual relations. Often ruins the church, his marriage, screws up his kids, causes some to decide they hate Jesus because of what occurred as they do not separate Jesus from the pastor's hypocritical vitriolic preaching vs lifestyle.
Seems like the pedos are just as likely to follow the same pathology of behavior. Their supposed activism is their beard of sorts.
Amen. This is all too common. The congregants need to know and be reminded regularly that they need to follow the Bible, not pastors. Many pastors want to be followed. Consider how the apostle Paul spoke about following those not Jesus Christ.
According to the Missouri Courts website, Marta was charged July 21 with child kidnapping, a felony. According to Newsweek, which published his mugshot, Marta was arrested on July 23. “A person commits the offense of child kidnapping
7/21 is 17 days after 7/4 when SOF released.
Odd coincidence.
Was someone trying to make a distraction?
The BACKPAGE trial was set for 7/20 but suddenly delayed to 7/31. And then another "coincidence".
Jim Larkin, the co-founder of the Phoenix New Times and the infamous classified ads site Backpage.com, died by suicide this week, just days ahead of his federal trial.
But the trial is still on even though a key defendant suddenly suicided. It's going to start next week after 5 years of delays.
I would say it’s 1.1 - A deep state operation to stop the phenomena of Sound of Freedom by making people think: “who earns the money from that movie” and to instill a doubt whether it’s ok to go to the cinema.
The legal article the article quotes fits the person rescuing a child too.
Even Tim Ballard could face the same charges:
A person commits the offense of child kidnapping if he or she is not a relative of the child within the third degree and, knowing he or she has no right to do so, removes a child under the age of fourteen without consent of the child’s parents or guardian, or confines such child for a substantial period of time without such consent
I would assume it’s most likely a deep state tactic.
What’s sad: there are sooooooo many stories of corruption, deviance among elites, Hollywood producers actors, writers …. Bla Bla Bla…. Usually don’t pay attention anymore. Most folks are a Kevin spacey… creepy perverts!
It's almost as if ex CIA/DHS agent Tim Ballard was taking out lower level child traffickers in order that whoever was funding him would control the entire market. This is how mafias operate.
3 options here:
It's a media narrative with no actual proof.
It's a white hat operation designed to make the remaining perverts pretending to be good guys squirm.
It's real.
Maybe he thought it would provide cover? “He donated to the SoF?” “He must really love kids”.
Kek, God is not mocked after all lmao. Kek!
Maybe his wife is a cunt who wants to castrate his son, but she has custody so he had to "kidnap" his child?
It’s sad to say, but my skepticism is such that all such acts of overt altruism, charity and philanthropy must now be viewed through the prism of cover and villainy. What is institutional capture but the very notion of otherwise good, civil, organised intentions at scale that have been corrupted, infiltrated and even weaponised for endlessly nefarious ends? The criminality and deception pervades so much that I consider it the rule, not the exception, until proven otherwise.
The mechanism of trust have always interested me. I trust God alone. This world is so bizarre at times I would not be surprised if a lamb bit me and a snake saved me. The ways of God are not the ways of man. We just never know. Until we do, forever. God drops us hints, but it's our job to dig and stand on our well meaning and diligently formed conviction.
That's why it's so important to bear witness of God in your life to others. They are getting the drops but might need help reading the comms.
Username checks out
That's what I think, unless the child is a family member and they're making a mountain out of a molehill
The only ones who might "get away with it" are the ones in the middle of all of it turncoating on the others. On the one hand you might think "no exceptions there must be justice" to which I go, "sure, but if they hadn't been involved and they hadn't turned, there would be NO justice. So at the very least there will be lesser punishments for those who cooperate, but don't expect the hanging tree for every pedo.
God does the rest, AFTER we do our best.
Mafiosi donated a lot to churches...
Hmm, that's not really all that true though. Sacrificing worldly treasure for the benefit of others could absolutely be repentance, and he could be used as a vehicle to protect and save other children.
It's not repentance to God that is the issue in cases like this; remember that God gives the final judgement, not you or I.
What is the issue is that if true, there is Earthly justice that needs to be meted out.
It does seem real but the way articles mention him makes it sound like he's one of the top financiers.
Turns out he's just someone that participated in the crowdfunding element of more than 6,600 people
Strange times we live in where pedes doubt the efforts of a movie like some freedom and we have to rely on Snopes for truth
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/sound-of-freedom-funder-fabian-marta-kidnapping/
Ummm, snopes? Really?
It's yahoo ;)
It’s Jezebel which is even worse if that’s possible
Ikr. Look at the name of that period rag. The name jezebel says it all fuck that shit it will go the way of it’s name sake- tossed out an window and eaten by stray curs lmao.
Tell me how you reallly feel 😁
Yeah,,, Gawker was Jezebels parent company and we all saw how that went.
?
I don't know, just a thought
Could be a bad dude who saw an investment opportunity to make a decent return.
Just looked it up on the net - Stary broke two hours ago. A lot of pedos hang with the opposite side to hide their evil little lives. Common Also, the movie staff wasn't going to background check every donor. Duh.
Trying so hard to defend the pedos and discredit the movie. Typical Yahoo stuff
Yep like how they were earlier running stories about Carlos Slim being a funder to try to drive people away from the movie. That didn't work so they're stepping it up.
Was going around yesterday
"According to the Missouri Courts website, Marta was charged July 21 with child kidnapping, a felony." What child? Is he the non-custodial parent or is this something else? Too many questions no one is asking and no one is offering up. I'm gonna bet this is another bullshit story designed to knock down "Sound of Freedom." I for one am not buying into the bullshit.
My first thought too. Is this a family dispute of some kind?
Exactly. Too many people are making assumptions and jumping to conclusions that may not be correct. This smells of propaganda.
Thankfully the 3rd top comment addressed the crux of the lawsuit.
The wording in that charge reeks of disinfo. Is he a non-custodial parent? Was he helping the child escape parental abuse? The possibilities are endless.
Saw this on a lib friend's social media, so I immediately knew it would be misleading. I was right.
Marta was one of 6600+ people who donated an average of $500 toward making the movie. So he was more like a gofundme donor, hardly a "financier" as the headline deceptively states.
And we don't know if this charge is a custody battle or what the facts are. Whatever it is, bet the farm it's nothing related to human trafficking.
There's been debate about some of money interests behind Sound of Freedom. One of those characters is Carlos Slim, a man with connections to Mexican cartels, Hillary Clinton, and Hunter Biden. Why did he fund the film?
Most philanthropists come from ruthless, wicked pasts. It's only in their senior years they offer to give back a pittance of the wealth that they stole. Evil people love to hide behind the bright light of good deeds.
I know about Disneyland, but fill me in on Universal Studios?
Asking because I went to the Florida one once, about 15 years ago. I thought it was right before the big fire, but the blaze was at the LA location.
They also spread around their money to try to obscure their donations to the more nefarious causes. I'm somewhat reminded of the Agatha Christie story "The ABC Murders" where only one of the victims was the true target the others were unfortunate people randomly chosen to cause the police to run around looking for a serial killer and the murder had a patsy set up as well. A similar plot was used in Law & Order where only one of the three victims was the actual target but because the three victims were black, latino, and asian the cops were initially chasing a suspected white supremacist for the first half of the episode.
Wasnt Carlos Slim Anthony Weiner?
That was Carlos Danger.
They think karma works as the currency of God. Dumb fuckers. God has NO regard for man apart from Christ and those in His shadow. Fuck luciferian khazarian knights of pythias fuckers and their god. (btw iphone shit keyboard doesn’t recognize luciferian or khazarian as words lmao)
Helping to fund a movie about crimes one commits is a pretty good smokescreen.
Reminds me of the pastors of churches where they would rail and scream from the pulpit about how evil homosexuality is (often to the point the pastor became known for that specific thing in the community) and those engaging in that sin are going to hell and on and on. Of course the pastor is not wrong that it is a sin according to scripture and not wrong that people living in that perversion lifestyle do need redemption and salvation in Jesus which would also lead to repentance. But often these preachers were over the top angry, vitriolic, aggressive and over focused on that single issue in their presentation.
Fast forward a few months or years and the same pastor ends up being outed as engaging in homosexual relations. Often ruins the church, his marriage, screws up his kids, causes some to decide they hate Jesus because of what occurred as they do not separate Jesus from the pastor's hypocritical vitriolic preaching vs lifestyle.
Seems like the pedos are just as likely to follow the same pathology of behavior. Their supposed activism is their beard of sorts.
Amen. This is all too common. The congregants need to know and be reminded regularly that they need to follow the Bible, not pastors. Many pastors want to be followed. Consider how the apostle Paul spoke about following those not Jesus Christ.
Top Fuckin Flight post
He "funded" the film with $500 and it was a custody dispute.
Media doing what media does.
Or it’s a smear that was made up to discredit the whole operation.
Yahoo….is skeerd.
If you’re gonna collect 15 million to make a film, odds are one of the people investing are gonna be shitty people
7/21 is 17 days after 7/4 when SOF released.
Odd coincidence.
Was someone trying to make a distraction?
The BACKPAGE trial was set for 7/20 but suddenly delayed to 7/31. And then another "coincidence".
https://www.thedailybeast.com/backpage-founder-jim-larkin-dies-by-suicide-days-before-trial
Larking (74) "suicides" 28 days after 7/4 (SOF).
But the trial is still on even though a key defendant suddenly suicided. It's going to start next week after 5 years of delays.
u/#q1051
That's interesting. The Q post about backpage features FREEDOM in all caps.
For human trafficking sex slaves.
IMO, innocent until proven guilty. SOF was filmed five years ago and went unreleased so doubt there is a connection.
Can’t wait for THE PLOT TWIST.
I would say it’s 1.1 - A deep state operation to stop the phenomena of Sound of Freedom by making people think: “who earns the money from that movie” and to instill a doubt whether it’s ok to go to the cinema.
The legal article the article quotes fits the person rescuing a child too.
Even Tim Ballard could face the same charges:
I would assume it’s most likely a deep state tactic.
What’s sad: there are sooooooo many stories of corruption, deviance among elites, Hollywood producers actors, writers …. Bla Bla Bla…. Usually don’t pay attention anymore. Most folks are a Kevin spacey… creepy perverts!
This gives people who are against the movie the opportunity to hate it because they hate pedos.
The article also runs down Tim as a bad guy. I suspect total BS!
It's almost as if ex CIA/DHS agent Tim Ballard was taking out lower level child traffickers in order that whoever was funding him would control the entire market. This is how mafias operate.
This!
Dude admitted to Carlos Slim financing the movie.
Ads for the movie all over FB. No misinformation warnings or anything.
Movie doesn't get into SRA, Adrenochrome, etc.
Yes, pretty much! They are after stem cells though, not adrenochrome.