That part doesn't matter, what matters is if they are going to be allowed to ban otherwise legal products or to tax them with such absurdly high fees you effective ban them.
This won't have to be enforced. Retailers will simply be charged a massive fee for the ability to sell meat/dairy, so the cost of these products will be out of reach for the average consumer.
Canada is considering banning the use of any plastic used for selling/displaying meat.
Of course the elites will still get meat - part of the burden for having to enlighten the commoners on how to be sustainable.
Nobody asked us about lockdowns and closing our businesses, masking and vax or losing our jobs either. We are slaves. Until enough of us decide we aren't anymore.
Good for them. They are going to get more of the anger and division they seek. Push closer to the precipice. MAYBE some of these cities will wake up and realize that we are being ramrodded instead of represented.
"The United States Constitution provides that the president "shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur" (Article II, section 2)."
From Google - I'm too lazy tonight to find a better source.
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it's inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress.
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
Article 2, Section 2
The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.
Just because an article somewhere on the internet says something, remember it does not mean it is true. I merely skimmed the article myself, so I cannot attack it too much.
I'm okay with banning diary, I barely use mine anyway.
That is comedic though... yes, I can totally see Los Angeles having ZERO private cars by 2030.
Just because an article somewhere on the internet says something, remember it does not mean it is true. I merely skimmed the article myself, so I cannot attack it too much. I'm okay with banning diary, I barely use mine anyway.
I don't think it's legal for cities to sign treaties.
Its not.
That part doesn't matter, what matters is if they are going to be allowed to ban otherwise legal products or to tax them with such absurdly high fees you effective ban them.
Lawsuit.
Unconstitutional.
Good judge
Win.
Nor is it legal to ban meat either.
Or fire arms.
Correct.
Unconstitutional.
Did the majority vote for this? Good luck trying to enforce this. Normal people won’t abide by some idiot signing the city up for this.
This won't have to be enforced. Retailers will simply be charged a massive fee for the ability to sell meat/dairy, so the cost of these products will be out of reach for the average consumer.
Canada is considering banning the use of any plastic used for selling/displaying meat.
Of course the elites will still get meat - part of the burden for having to enlighten the commoners on how to be sustainable.
You understand their playbook now, good.
Of course they did, or at least that's what the voting machine identified their votes as.
"Trans votes matter!"
Derp
What in the world? I live in one of those cities and no one asked the citizens whether we were in agreement with this! This is WAY OVER THE LINE.
Nobody asked us about lockdowns and closing our businesses, masking and vax or losing our jobs either. We are slaves. Until enough of us decide we aren't anymore.
When fraud chosee your elected leaders they had a mandate. Fraudulent elections have huge consequences in a republic.
Austin Boston Chicago Houston Los Angeles Miami New Orleans New York City Philadelphia Phoenix Portland San Francisco Washington, D.C. Seattle
So, no Mexican food because it all has meat or cheese or sour cream or all of the above.
Yes and that makes the Deep State racist.
Good for them. They are going to get more of the anger and division they seek. Push closer to the precipice. MAYBE some of these cities will wake up and realize that we are being ramrodded instead of represented.
No more Cheesesteaks in Philly? Yeah, right!
Yes Pats
Never happen
My new career begins…bootlegging whole milk and beef.
Hey frogs, come on down to Houston. I feel a sudden urge to throw the BBQ in the back of the truck and head to the park for a party.
Love bein in the country
Not hard to guess which cities have been taken over by Mr Global
I didn’t even have to look at the list, yep, it’s the dumb cities.
Hell, I think Seattle did even before the wef'rs did.
Pure evil!!!
Wait.
Miami??
"The United States Constitution provides that the president "shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur" (Article II, section 2)."
From Google - I'm too lazy tonight to find a better source.
Problem is they concur at 2:00 am. so 2 or 3 senators being present can concur. I.E. Obumma care.
Except they don't need to sign a treaty to try and pass policies that achieve the goals of the treaty.
The American city members of C40 include:
Austin
Boston
Chicago
Houston
Los Angeles
Miami
New Orleans
New York City
Philadelphia
Phoenix
Portland
San Francisco
Washington, D.C.
Seattle
Thank you fren.
US Constitution, Article 1, Section 10
Austin? Banning meat anywhere in Texas is not bound to go over well.
lol, NYC tried to tax soda once, didn’t pan out.
What was the reason the Deep State wants to ban meat?
More dumb fearmongering that won't amount to anything.
Vlad — please update your targeting coordinates.
Arrest them.
Ain't nobody coming down south and doin away with my BBQ ribs! Kek
yay Phoenix......
Its all part of the plan /s
Pretty sure it's legal to drag these idiots into the streets and beat them.
Applies only to US citizens in these sanctuary cities obviously.
Or
Yeah that’ll go over big just like the cooking with gas woks
If you live in those cities...MOVE...problem solved.
Sorry thepeoplesvoice is realrawnews rebranded I believe. It was a larpy as shit site then and I'm sure it is now as well.
Sorry, but I'm revoking your digital warrior ID.
Primary sources are a thing. Don't shoot the messenger.
https://www.c40.org/
Completely unlawful. The courts need to step in. Unfortunately the courts are as corrupt as the rest of the system...
Just because an article somewhere on the internet says something, remember it does not mean it is true. I merely skimmed the article myself, so I cannot attack it too much. I'm okay with banning diary, I barely use mine anyway.
That is comedic though... yes, I can totally see Los Angeles having ZERO private cars by 2030.
So you are ok with banning and taking away peoples freedom to use these products?
Sour cream
Cheese
Milk
Cream
Chocolate
Ice Cream
Yogurt
Butter
Cake
Pudding
Gravies and Sauces
Primary sources are your friend -
https://www.c40.org/
You're OK with a dairy ban just because you don't drink milk?
Hope you like those beetle burgers without cheese!
I said I'm okay with banning DIARY as I don't use mine. I was merely making light of your typo. =D